Since Sajak is in the apologetic mood, are there any other “bitter-sounding, hate-mongering name-caller(s)” that he regrets giving the “Sajak Bump?” After the jump, check out the boost Sajak gave to up-and-coming radio star Rush Limbaugh, and the near-riot that ensued.
First of all, if Keith Olbermann qualifies as a “bitter-sounding, hate-mongering name-caller”, then surely the man whose latest, greatest hits include calling President
In another Olbermann parallel, while the Countdown host denies that his recent suspension was a ratings conspiracy, Limbaugh sees the wheels a-turning in that CBS audience:
LIMBAUGH: …they had a series of producers that had nothing do with your show that were assigned to this one, and the audience was totally stacked against me, it was…SAJAK: Studio audience.LIMBAUGH: Studio audience was entirely stacked against me, and I — to this day, I don’t know, and I’m being very charitable here — I don’t know if it was done on purpose, with the intent to sabotage my effort, or if it was done on purpose as a result of a misunderstanding during production meetings about some of the things I said I might find challenging and eager to do.
Sajak seems like a reasonable, if a bit clueless, guy. In that earlier Rush appearance, he actually debated Limbaugh about sensible gun regulation, and aside from dubbing him a bitter hate-monger, Sajak was actually quite
As such, it only seems fair that Sajak issue a similar mea culpa where Limbaugh is concerned. How about it, Mr. Sajak? Want to buy a vowel? “I’m S_rry.”