Carney acknowledges the implications of this question, but makes some serious points giving some legitimacy to the claim.
If the life of an elderly wealthy family member extends into 2013, the tax bills will be substantially higher. An estate that could bequest $3
million this year will leave just $1.9 million after taxes next year. Shifting a death from January to December could produce $1.1 million in tax savings.It may seem incredible to contemplate pulling the plug on grandma to save tax dollars. While we know that investors will sell stocks to avoid rising capital gains taxes, accelerating the death of a loved one seems at least a bit morbid—perhaps even evil. Will people really make life and death decisions based on taxes? Do we don our green eye shades when it comes to something this serious?
He cites examples of people purposefully delaying their deaths in order to live through significant dates, and of parents deliberately making sure children were born on a certain date to be eligible for a government-offered bonus. In particular, he brings up death elasticity, an actual term used to describe the act of changing the timing of death to coincide with changes in estate tax rates.
But lest you think it’s all greedy heirs and beneficiaries trying to pull the plug, Carney highlights a 2008 paper finding that the patients themselves will voluntarily decide to end their own lives early in order in exchange for “large financial implications for their kin.”
Carney acknowledges a lack of formal academic work on the issue of death elasticity, but it’s still an interesting phenomenon to contemplate, the idea of settling on your time of death in order to give
You can read Carney’s full piece here.
[Image via]
—–
Follow Josh Feldman on Twitter: @feldmaniac