The intermarriage and criminal justice questions suffer from the same assumption that other recent polls have, which is that the demarcation line on these questions must necessarily be race. Gallup didn’t even bother to crosstab these questions by party or ideology, which severely hampers their usefulness.
For example, on intermarriage, they break it down by race, but
However, other polls on racially-charged issues show a sharp partisan divide, which would be a useful thing to know about on this question. If 16% of whites disapprove of black-white intermarriage, but most of them are of one party or ideology, that would be a significant finding that would suggest there’s more work to be done, and how it can get done.
Similarly, Gallup doesn’t crosstab its criminal justice question by party or ideology, leaving the reader to conclude that either black people are too sensitive, or white people are dicks, or some combination of the two. But if the problem isn’t really a racial one, but one of political belief, then the solution is quite different. Black-white “chasms” feed narratives that are attractive
For example, Gallup did crosstab its affirmative action poll by party, and while there was a 24-point split in support for affirmative action between white (51%) and black (76%) respondents, the partisan divide was just a wee bit chasm-y, at 80% support for affirmative action by Democrats, and just 40% for Republicans. Overall, a large majority of Americans, 58%, support affirmative action, but another seemingly confounding result in Gallup’s poll illustrates an important point. Although 58% of Americans support affirmative action, just 42% support using it in college admissions. That seems really weird, until you see how Gallup asked the question. Instead of just asking if race or ethnicity should or should not be considered as part of the admissions process, the choices given were between considering race, and considering applicants based “solely on merit.”
I normally hate complaints of question bias in polls, but this is pretty glaring, an explicit framing of racial diversity as being without merit, and it suggests that perhaps Gallup ought to work on having a more diverse array of viewpoints in the room when they’re thinking up their questions.
Finally, before we start breaking our arms patting ourselves