Maher: When it comes to the police, there is never any excuse for what happened. For shooting a policeman? Of course, we all condemn that. There is no ands, ifs, or buts. I don’t condone it, but I do understand it.Matthews: You understand that guy?Maher: Well, I understand the motivation, yes. How many videos can you see? How many years can go by when this is going on when black people are brutally
assault? The last guy, right on the ground, and he put a slug in him. I’m surprised somebody did not fire back sooner.
The flashing red headline here is, of course, that the Dallas shooter wasn’t firing “back” at anyone, he was just firing. The police officers he attacked were, in fact, engaged in protecting and serving black people at that very moment. Maher may want some slack on the semantics in service of his broader point, but words matter.
Beyond that obvious flaw, though, Bill Maher doesn’t “understand” the black experience any more than Donald Trump does. Maher is filtering white perceptions of black life through how a white person would feel about that already-wrong perception. First of all, black people don’t experience police aggression by accumulating video views, they are immersed in it firsthand, almost from birth. A white person cannot know what that’s like. If a white person decides to accept the version of this reality that they can now see thanks to these videos, then they empathize from the point of view of someone who has always expected to feel safe and protected by the police.
What’s ironic is that in trying to empathize with black people, Maher is actually arousing a visceral anxiety in white people, the idea that black people have been treated so poorly (or “treated” so “poorly” because the “media&