On May 20th, 2008, Bush’s Press Secretary Dana Perino fielded a question from Fox News about “the back-and-forth between you guys [the White House] and NBC News” about the semantic issue of calling battles in Iraq a “civil war.” Perino, in proto-Robert Gibbs fashion, responded by
Perino also spoke about NBC News unfairly editing the president’s comments, referring to segments airing a few days prior about Iraq. The day before Perino’s answer, Counselor to the President Ed Gillespie sent a letter to NBC News President Steve Capus insisting the network air the president’s full remarks. He wrote:
This deceitful editing to further a media-manufactured storyline is utterly misleading and irresponsible and I hereby request in the interest of fairness and accuracy that the network air the President’s responses to both initial questions in full on the two programs that used the excerpts.
Gillespie continued with a more pointed attack: “Mr. Capus, I’m sure you don’t want people to conclude that there is really no distinction between the ‘news’ as reported on NBC and the ‘opinion’ as reported on MSNBC, despite the increasing blurring of those lines.”
Hm… “deceitful,” “fairness,” “accuracy,” “news” and “opinion” — it all sounds very familiar. This, of course, is only one example of eight years worth of jockeying. And then there’s the response — we’
MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann was livid at the idea of the White House attacking the media, which he saw as an attack on Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press and Freedom of Dissent. Check out a vintage Olbermann special comment on the issue, below: