“A red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized,” Obama said in the summer of 2012.
“Now, the grey area there is translating what ‘a whole bunch’ means,” Limbaugh said. “And that’s where they’re going to play games here.”
Limbaugh cited some media reports which provided the government with a more ambiguous reading of Obama’s “red line.” He identified ABC News as one outlet which was actively trying “to get Obama out of this jam” by liberally interpreting what Obama’s “red line” meant.
RELATED: Before Striking Syria, Obama Should Follow Bush’s Lead
“So, even when Obama says he’s being very clear, he’s being too
“Now, how can we be sure that Obama isn’t trying to get us into yet another war?” the host asked. “Remember, Obama needs to distract people from his domestic agenda falling apart — well, falling apart from our perspective. From his perspective, it’s right on schedule.”
But he still needs people distracted from it. People don’t like what’s happening. They don’t yet associate Obama with it. You know that drill. But even, so Obama doesn’t want to run the risk that at some point people are going to associate what’s happening with him, so just keep people distracted. It’s exactly what he accused Bush of doing.
Listen to the clip below via The Rush Limbaugh Show:
h/t Daily Rushbo
—
> >Follow Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) on Twitter