The Washington Post reported the story as “BREAKING” – but it wasn’t a surprise. What it means is Stephanopoulos has to take the job.
Every reporter on the TV news beat has their sources for stories, and this lengthy GMA decision is no exception. We reported Stephanopoulos was the leading contender for the job on October 19, had more details on November 18 and still more earlier this week. There are likely a dozen or so people in this same situation. For months, ABC News has been especially tight-lipped about all movement even as some leaks have gotten out. But now we hear Stephanopoulos was offered the job in the middle of “intensive negotiations”? Something doesn’t add up.
There are a couple reasons why “sources familiar with the situation” would tell this to the
It doesn’t help Stephanopoulos’ side to put this out there, because the only reason he would is if he, essentially, was going to turn down the offer. Having it on record that he was offered the job, and turned it down, allows him to stay in his role (in D.C., talking politics) while making clear he was not passed over for the big opportunity. Still, this doesn’t help in keeping the succession low-key.
Instead, we need to look at the one thing that is most important to GMA: beating the long-time morning news leader, NBC’s Today show. It is clear ABC believes Stephanopoulos gives them the best chance to do that, and they want him in Sawyer’s seat. To pull back now – to give the job to Chris
We’ll know the answer in one week – and the way things are going, we’ll probably know it before that through another leak. But for Stephanopoulos to say no now would hurt him, hurt ABC News and, most importantly, turn this major series of anchor succession at ABC News from low-key to highly dramatic.
—–
» Follow Steve Krakauer on Twitter