The minute I saw that headline, I thought of this:
Every few months or so, my Facebook newsfeed is electrified by people who are just discovering the treasure trove of blog posts insisting that the minister
While there’s no shame in a Millennial trying to make a career out of the table scraps that are thrown to the unfortunate j-school graduates of this day and age, there is something sort of embarrassing about established adults trafficking in this type of trash; grown-ups should try to think on a level above that of the average 20-year-old blogger. Somehow, though, the framework is the same in both posts: They found something dubious that could be scandalous. They typed up an emotional, anger-stoking post on some blog. Bored people who don’t know much about movie production or illustration — or, in this case, presidential campaigning and journalism — shared it
That’s all the story about President Barack Obama‘s supposed erection is. It is nonsense. If you shared it, you fell for it, you perpetuated it, and you should feel bad. There was no visible erection in The Little Mermaid and there was no visible erection on Obama’s campaign plane.
Yes, yes, it’s understandable that this happened. People are very, very basic. Sex sells. The outline of possible erections sells. At our core, we are all impulse-driven sex robots programmed to reproduce. Fine.
What makes humans different from other sex robots like rabbits or dogs, though, is that we can work past our phallic focus — or “dixation,” as I call it — using our ability to reason and function logically. We don’t actually have to fall for juvenile tricks. We could rise above it all if we tried.
I hear you now, shrieking at your iPad: “B-b-but Lindsey! If you think crass headlines about dicks are so cheap, why are you so scandalized by Donald Trump getting caught on a hot mic talking about grabbing women by the pussy?”
Good question!
The “Obama flaunted his pee-pee!” story relies on a false equivalency to Trump’s 2005 remarks, too. The article accompanying the video — which,
While there is certainly something to be said for the taboo feeling that comes with being able to say “pussy” on cable TV only four weeks ahead of an election, the reason that story caught on is because Trump was promoting sexual assault. We aren’t sharing and dissecting that old audio because of the word “pussy”; we are sharing and dissecting it because he told Billy Bush how easy it is to use a position of power to get away with doing “anything” to women. We are sharing and dissecting it because he admitted to kissing women without their consent. Those statements are not “randy comments.”
If Obama were truly flaunting his arousal in front of a bunch of female journalists, it, too, would be disgusting and worthy of outrage. What we have here, however, is actual footage of the entire scene. The journalists are laughing and telling one another to sit down, but there is no indication that anything vaguely inappropriate or sexual is happening.
With Trump’s comments, there is enough evidence that he said something truly abhorrent and wrong without the benefit of visual aid. With Obama’s “erection” video, there is bountiful evidence to the contrary.
Oh, and with The Little Mermaid, anyone who isn’t specifically looking for a cartoon
[image via screengrab]