It has always been my personal policy to do my best to refrain from speaking ill of the dead, even on a substantive basis, for at least a day or two following an untimely death, and if possible, to find something nice to say. In Justice Scalia’s case, I recounted my lone meeting with him, at 2013’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner, where he was gracious, generous with his time, and a personally delightful person. He was probably the nicest of the hundreds of people I met that night.
As for his record and legacy, those were better
Similarly, Hillary Clinton said that Scalia was “a dedicated public servant who brought energy and passion to the bench,” which could also partially describe Bill Buckner.
Then there was Bernie Sanders, who, in an interview on this week’s Fox News Sunday, told Chris Wallace that he had “respect” for Scalia’s service to his country:
WALLACE: You disagreed with Justice Scalia on a judicial basis, not a personal basis, on almost every issue. What do you think his legacy is, sir?SANDERS: Well, clearly, he was a brilliant man. A very colorful man. Aa very outspoken man. And I happen to respect people who are willing to come under public scrutiny and serve their country. So you’re right, Chris, he and I had very different points of view, but I respect people who are willing and prepared to serve their country.
There are many things to respect about Justice Scalia. As President Obama said, the man had a stellar intellect, and it would be impossible to deny his skill in an argument. The
But to respect his service to our country is to acknowledge that Justice Scalia ever did a service to his country, when his actual record as a Supreme Court justice is toxic to anyone who cares about the things that make this country great. Did Sanders respect the service Scalia did when he argued that black students might be better off going to a “slower-track school where they do well,” a remark that even shocked Donald Trump?
Was it the great service Scalia did when he helped the court gut the Voting Rights Act, which he chalked up to “perpetuation of racial entitlement?” Was it his inconsistent dissent on the Defense of Marriage Act, in which he railed against overturning the will of the duly-elected legislature just days after overturning the Voting Rights Act that was passed by the duly-elected legislature?
I wish that Antonin Scalia were still alive today. I wish he’d continued to live a long life, long enough to perhaps learn how wrong he had been, or long enough to retire from the bench and live out his days entertaining white people at cocktail parties with “provocative” conversation and impish charm. Either of those things would have been a service