The example in D.C. is not the only one of its kind. Several states are reportedly using stimulus-funded signs to promote stimulus-funded projects that are “putting America to work” – Illinois has put up 950 of them for $650,000, and Pennsylvania has bought 70 at an average cost of $2,000 per sign. And although Jill Zuckerman of the Department of Transportation says the signs count for under .02 percent of total project spending, a handful Republicans are less than pleased with how the money is being spent.
Congressman Aaron Schock of Illinois is one of them, claiming that around $20 million in
Darrell Issa, Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, wants to take it a step further with an investigation to “determine the scope and impact of the Obama administration’s guidance” in relation to the signage.
In all of the fuss about the signs, no one seems to have asked the most important question of all: what, exactly, are road signs made out of that makes them so expensive? Does their shimmery green hue come from crushed Peruvian emeralds? Are they crafted from titanium to withstand a blow from a runaway 18-wheeler? Surely there is some way to cut the cost of these signs. May we recommend switching to poster board and construction paper, with generously applied glitter glue for reflective purposes.