not a fan of rick, but this dan savage is a piece of shit and hope  he  lives a long miserable life

Lol!! Poor Santorum, he loses again!! The lesson learned here: Rick is not popular enough to give Google a second thought!! Though, if Sponge Bob had the same problem… Google would remove the results immediately!!

I Googled it just or fun and the first result in came up “Butt Muncher”!! Go figure??

The political slant at Google is well known.  And it’s not just the search engine.  Go see what news stories they give top slots to at Google News.  And that’s why Obama administration gave Google a free pass on antitrust scrutiny for their Motorola acquisition.  Imagined what would happen if Murdoch tried to make a deal like that in the US.

Couldn’t happen to a better guy!

Well, since they previously refused to make changes on behalf of Samuel T. Sodomy …

so what word did Santorum replace? Savage?

Santorum deserves every search result he gets—buh bye—-collect your toys and go home now—nobody likes you anyway….

He’s not, actually. He’s a gay rights activist.  He’s the creator of the “It Gets Better” project to help gay people feel comfortable in their own skin. 

Santorum regularly belittled the lifestyle of Dan Savage and has said many reprehensible things regarding homosexuals and homosexuality.  Santorum is responsible, via his words, for Savage’s actions.  It’s just that Savage was significantly more intelligent than Santorum. 

And when all is said and done, Santorum has a Google problem.  And it couldn’t have happened to a nicer, more repressed POS than Santorum.

I say Savage completes the take-down and goes after “Rick”. 

santorum’s words are responsible for savages actions…….thanks but no thanks on that defense

Dan Savage is the hateful piece of shit that likes to spread his infectious bodily fluids all over door knobs and drinking vessels and everything else he thinks people will come into direct contact with so that he can make them sick with his illnesses.
 
He’s also an extremely hateful, vulgar person who says that he’d like to anally rape people he doesn’t like.

Of course, this makes him a leftist role model.

of course you don’t buy that defense.  let me explicate for you:

santorum demonized and vilified a population (LGBT). an activist of that population created a definition that gained relevance search-wise to the point it became #1 on Google.

it also appears if you use Yahoo! or Bing as a search engine.  (try it)

lesson: say what you want.  but be prepared to reap what you sow.

Waaaaah! Why won’t those mean ol’ libruls let us be bigoted and try to impose our religulousness on everyone else in peace?

ok i see…….i hope your wife doesn’t mouth off too you because we know she is responsible for your actions

see both are being assholes and are responsible for their own actions

well, i’m a straight female, so no wife. 

that said, you’re comparison is absurd.  Santorum demonized people he doesn’t even know because of what?  Personal experience.  Oh, no.  Just that supernatural thing people call “God”.  He demonized a population and wants to suppress any rights to equality for that population.  How is that LESS reprehensible then Savage’s “response”? 

And NOTHING Savage did is illegal.  Nothing Santorum did is illegal.  So Santorum has to suck it up.  And this can serve as a lesson to those who want to demonize a population – think before you speak.  Or be prepared for those who oppose your POV to take action against you. And like I said, couldn’t have happened to a more deserving POS.  Aside  from ego, has any harm come to Santorum? Nope.

Like this?
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-maher-panel-hits-new-low-with-talk-of-hard-fking-michele-bachmann-and-rick-santorum/

You defend the savage Maron, and the moron Savage as having free speech to say such disgusting things and some liberals even defined this vile attack as “comedy” on behalf of Maher! Yet Santorum voices an objection to homosexuality, (no matter what other unicorn titles you try calling it), and you condemn him! What about his free speech?

Santorum is responsible for Savage’s actions? REALLY? Bet you say the same thing about the woman who is raped because she wore a short skirt! Mary Jo Kopechne is dead today because she got into a car with Ted Kennedy! Monica Lewinsky is to blame for bringing the pizza and the cigars! The masseuse is responsible for Algore’s failed shakra release. Reille Hunter is responsible for the affair because Elizabeth had cancer…..

Google runs things in a way that is as close to a free market system as you can get. You guys are so quick to politicize everything when it something offends you.

Waaaaaah! Why won’t those evil republicans let us tolerant and diverse liberals be bigoted as we really are, and try to impose our Darwinism and unproven evolution theory on everyone else in peace?

Well said Bob, from a liberal, incompletely evolved ape! Get your damn dirty ape paws off that keyboard and stop throwing primordial goo at everyone!

So, in short

you, a conservative. don’t want to take any responsibility for your own words.

bing
http://www.bing.com/search?q=santorum&go=&qs=n&sk=&sc=8-8&form=QBLH
dogpile
http://www.dogpile.com/info.dogpl.t2.8/search/web?fcoid=417&fcop=topnav&fpid=27&q=santorum
lycos
http://search.lycos.com/?tab=w&searchForm=true&query=santorum&x=0&y=0&diktfc=48754D651D15DCAC83B4F46BB8CE0C30A5ED384F3DF8
yahoo
http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=AkAJI7Q6Ja_piTEggYniMASbvZx4?p=santorum&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-701
webcrawler
http://webcrawler.com/webcrawler/ws/results/Web/santorum/1/417/TopNavigation/Relevance/iq=true/zoom=off/_iceUrlFlag=7?_IceUrl=true

you are a  poosey with no balls

Oxycon are a hateful piece of shit that likes to spread infectious bodily fluids all over door knobs and drinking vessels and everything else he thinks people will come into direct contact with so he can make them sick with his illness

Thats how dumb you sound

why are you a poosey/

felix is too stupid to mention  that google is not getting a free pass on antitrust security

LOLZ

felix is STUUUUPID

Nobody? Now that is just fact-less! Using the liberal talking points, “Most Americans no longer agree with B. Hussein o’bama” Just look at the democrats jumping ship over the “jobs” bill! barry will be leaving the WH toys behind on his way out the door in 2012!

See Lightsquared. See Solyndra. See Fast and Furious. See NY-9. See NV. See Wisconsin recall election, FAILED by union thugs….

I agree with you

Again? Go away, retard. Hit spell check, pussy.

However, Google maintains that it is not in the business of removing or censoring search results with the exception of “very limited cases such as illegal content and violations of our webmaster guidelines.”

This is clearly a lie as we’ve all seen Google get punked on their trends lists and immediately move to “take corrective action.”  Google is siding politically with the gay activist and his gutter tactics.

Santorum replaced Slick Willey, who was leaving lube and jizz all over the place. Santorum has been replaced by Frank-bagger. The homosexual Barney that no one wants their male children anywhere near! He cannot even speak without that crap flying out of his mouth!

Anyone who spreads such filth in the culture, no matter the cause, is not a decent person, as you make Savage out to be in your argumentation above.  His actions should’ve been your first clue as to who was morally in the wrong here.  But then there’s this…

He’s not, actually. He’s a gay rights activist.

You state this as if the two were mutually exclusive.  Right from the get go, in the first sentence, there’s no reasoning with you.  He’s a gay rights activist and therefore, in your mind, can do no wrong.

Wow.

It would go down like google did in China…

Santorum is a member of the Catholic church – an instituion that has allowed the rape of children, has protected the rapists, moving them to a new population of victims.

Santorum got his free speech.  So did Savage.  But you’re just mad that Savage’s free speech and activism pwnd Santorum.  Why can’t you understand that Santorum brought this on himself time and time again?  Savage has done more for LGBT population than Santorum has done for *anyone*

I won’t even dignify your rape comments.  I’m not a member of a political party that attempted to redefine “rape” regarding Title X. I’m not a member of a political party that thinks the female’s uterus is of less value than a man’s penis (Viagra, etc.). 

Apparently, that would be YOU. 

“As close to the free market system you can get”? So it is just a little “socialist”, or just a little “censored”, or just a little “biased”?

You are so quick to defend something that you agree with, regardless of the arguments presented. How tolerant and diverse of you liberal whiner.

So you think that Google is “all liberal and stuff”?  Google images for Michelle Obama.  The offensive ones haven’t been removed.  Your argument goes out the window.

So it’s o.k. to voice an objection to homosexuality, but not to voice an opinion about an attack on homosexuality?

Impose Darwinism?  Unproven evolution theory?

You know the stork doesn’t really deliver babies, right?

New from Proctor and Gamble:
Santorum Away™ 

Santorum Away™ uses anti frothy action to clean away the Santorum.
Guaranteed to remove nasty Santorum stains or your money back!

Can be found in all major Adult Book Stores, Sex Toy Boutiques and WalMart.

Endorsed by the American Family Association!

By not “dignifying” rape comments, avoidswork(precise name for a liberal) means that the argument is insurmountable!

This is the opposite argument that liberals provide for the terrorist muslims! We cannot blame ALL muslims for the actions of a few “radical terrorist” muslims, yet avoidswork paints the ENTIRE CATHOLIC CHURCH and all of its MEMBERS with a broad brush and condemns them all because of a few rapist/homosexual/predatory priests!

Amazing how that works, huh? Savage is a homosexual activist. THe liberals never use the term “gay-o-phobia” do they? Call a homosexual activist what it is.

You are a liberal, avoidswork. Or a progressive. Or whatever term you warped democrats are calling yourself these days. A turd like you is still a turd, even if you call yourself a rose, and you still stink like a turd.

You know what ALL of you anti-Savage people fail to point out:

This began in 2003.  The Savage neologism of “Santorum” has been topping Google since 2006.

It’s now 2011. 

catholic church? the same catholic church that nancy pelosi is part of

I condemn an INSTITUTION that allows the rape of children to go unpunished. And I condemn any members that would tithe that same institution instead of raging against it.  I would use my money as my voice to disavow it.  That doesn’t mean one has to disavow God, but they should care about protecting children above all.  But you’re apparently cool with it since it’s only a few rogue priests… 

I didn’t dignify your assertion of stupid arguments for saying rape is okay.  It’s not (male or female).  But you tell me how our criminal justice system treats rape victims, child victims and the like. Your side likes to rage about a few false accusations against males as representative of how “women lie about rape”.

 It ain’t libs telling girls to not dress provocatively or you’re asking for it. It ain’t libs telling rape victims to have a baby because it’s God’s plan.  Nope, just RWers.

How’s that free market working for you?  You like it? 

No, I don’t believe Google ought to be in the business of cleansing or suppressing the internet of content and imagery to any applicant that happens along (BTW, how far down do I have to scroll to find those “offensive ones” of Michelle Obama?  My internet is a real dog right now, but there doesn’t seem to be a whole lot – far less than I would’ve supposed.).  But they can stop the clear abuse of their trend reporting as they do when matters directly affect themselves.  And that’s all this appears to be, a public campaign to manipulate Google trends so to besmirch the name of a public figure.  As opposed to reporting sites which happens to have offensive imagery of a political nature as part of its content and just so happens to be popular.  That’s the difference.

So you think that Google is “all liberal and stuff”?

I think a company that has to remind itself not to be evil in so public a fashion probably already knows it’s not to be trusted.  Their reputedly being a progressive friendly institution doesn’t at all help.  Their ‘playing ball’ with the Obama administration as felix_w points out above cements it.

@fishcook…
you consider a person voicing an objection to an “attack”, just like your dear leader does, as evidenced by attackwatch.com. You have thin skin like the big-eared donkey inhabiting the White House. Just like him, facts and the truth are hate speech to you clowns.

My example showed militant homosexuals practicing hate speech against Bachmann and Santorum. If any conservative heterosexual made those comments about any leftist raging homosexual, you and the liberal media would go insane!

“as we try to impose our Darwinism and unproven evolution theory on everyone else in peace?”

Is the bible proven?

Only you and General “the nature freak” Zod would know that! What did Santorum say in 2003?
A controversy arose following Santorum’s statements about homosexuality in an interview with the Associated Press that was published on April 20, 2003. In response to a question about how to prevent sexual abuse of children
by priests, Santorum said the priests were engaged in “a basic
homosexual relationship”, and went on to say that he had “[...] no
problem with homosexuality. I have a problem with homosexual acts”; that
the right to privacy, as detailed in Griswold v. Connecticut, “doesn’t exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution”; that, “whether it’s polygamy, whether it’s adultery, whether it’s sodomy, all of those things are antithetical to a healthy, stable, traditional family”; and that sodomy laws properly exist to prevent acts that “undermine the basic tenets of our society and the family”.

So he was AGAINST the sodomy of children by homosexuals that infiltrated the priesthood! What? He had no problem with homosexuality? What? There are US Laws against it? Did Santorum pass those laws?

I will take your word for it without conducting that search. Admit that it is a bullying tactic. You just happen to approve of it because Santorum’s a jerk. What about anyone else named Santorum? I take it the search engines don’t really differentiate on that. Plus there is something to be said of the fact that a gay rights advocate would use the product of a homosexual act to stigmatize his opponent.

Dude, you’re losing it. None of that made any sense whatsoever. Have you been tested for bipolar? I think you should consider seeing a therapist.

Typical General Zod post. How much Santorum Away do you have? I’ll bet it is a lot, to support that lifestyle of yours! How much stock in the company have you purchased? Why won’t Target, K-Mart, Costco, JC Penney, Macy’s, Sears, Sam’s Club, Overstock, Amazon, Bed, Bath and beyond, Nordstrom, L.L. Bean, Kohl’s, Dillards, Neiman Marcus, Filene’s, Gately’s department store, Marks and Spencer and others not sell this amazing product of which you support?

BTW… It is Wal-Mart, retard. Goo-Goo it.

How’s life on the racist mean streets of God’s waiting room where you witness so much “deep southern segregation?”

He didn’t “voice an objection to homosexuality” he demonized an entire group of
people. There is a difference.

Now Goo-Goo Sarah Palin images. First site…
http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalin/ig/Sarah-Palin-Pictures/

First Moochelle site…
http://www.zimbio.com/Michelle+Obama/pictures/pro

Nope… No bias here….

The ironic thing about Savage’s childish behavior is that he certainly makes the “aftermath” of an act inherent to gay male sexual partners to be rather putrid, no? 

I guess we can presume that many gay males (and straight males who engage in said behavior) have a bit of “Santorum” in them, or at least, on them. 

That’s what reaping what you sew is really all about.  So while some kiddies get their jollies over this pathetic exercise, they really don’t quite understand that they are really making themselves look bad in the process. 

Yeah, not sure if you want to go there.  That business that went unreported for so long regarding the Catholic Church and the rape of children was mostly owing to an undercurrent of homosexuality preexisting within Church borne from earlier times in which homosexuality was an anathema.  It’s was for the reason that gays could assume a position of authority over others that drew homosexuals to the priesthood.  There, they could occupy a strata of society in which their statuses as single, unattached males wouldn’t draw undue attention.  And from such unassailable positions, they could abuse their powers and younger, impressionable parishioners.

The central issue to the Catholic Church rape scandals is by far more a “gay” thing than it is a “Catholic” thing.

If the “Theory of Evolution” were proven, it would be a LAW, like the Law of Gravity and the Law of Relativity. The fossil record does not support evolution. We ought to find a colossal number of transitional organisms in the
fossil record — for example, a squirrel on its way to becoming a bat,
or a bear becoming a whale. (Those are actual Darwinian claims.) But that’s not what the fossil record shows. We don’t have fossils for
any intermediate creatures in the process of evolving into something
better. This is why the late Stephen Jay Gould of Harvard referred to
the absence of transitional fossils as the “trade secret” of
paleontology. (Lots of real scientific theories have “secrets.”)

If you get your news from the American news media, it will come as a
surprise to learn that when Darwin first published “On the Origin of
Species” in 1859, his most virulent opponents were not fundamentalist
Christians, but paleontologists.

Unlike high school biology teachers lying to your children
about evolution, Darwin was at least aware of what the fossil record
ought to show if his theory were correct. He said there should be
“interminable varieties, connecting together all the extinct and
existing forms of life by the finest graduated steps.”
And as he had admitted, these steps do not exist, and Darwin knew this was his fatal flaw in his theory.

Funny how our Gregorian calender is based on the life and death of a guy called Jesus, huh? Who according to Godless liberals, did not exist!

And babies are not evolving in trees with apes either, nor are they walking out of the sea as transformed tadpoles. Nor has anyone located the primordial goo spurring all creation. Nor are there new species evolving right before our eyes.

If Darwin is correct, why do liberals have an “endangered species list?” Shouldn’t liberals herald the death of an unfit for survival former primordial goo entity?

Who delivered the stork?

Wow, great liberal comeback. I only quoted your post. Goo-Goo bi-polar. Your insinuation makes no sense. Guess it is because you lost the argument with your own words.

As you wrote, you are quick to criticize everything (or anyone) when it something offends you. “When it something that offends you?” Spell much?

Why should Google change the definition of the word “Santorum”?  You can’t just go around changing definitions.

Why should Google change the definition of the word “Santorum”?  You can’t just go around changing definitions.

Calcat36,

Lifestyle? Only with the ladies.

Wal -Mart? OK!
Calcat36,
Are you grammar girl? Jesus H Christ!
http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/

Why did I use Wal-Mart?
This is one of the reasons.
http://www.peopleofwalmart.com/
Can I have permission to use your list?

Dude, The informal segregation is not as bad as it use to be, but it does still exist to a degree. There are still race relation problems but not as bad as they were 30 years ago.
I am 40 years old. The 80′s were bad regarding race relations down in the region I grew up. The high school I went to did not desegragate until 1971.

General Zod will be back. I promise!
Did I answer your questions?

Boo freaking hoo Rick.

Perhaps you should have thought about consequences before deciding to spout off about LGBT people and committing  to fight against our civil rights.

You can whine and moan and play the victim all you want, in reality you are the perfect example of the oppressor and certainly not the oppressed. You screw with my civil rights as a trans women.. you screw with countless gay and lesbian friends I’ve met both in my day to day life, as well as through the wonders of social media and I don’t have sympathy for your little dilemma, on the contrary I laugh about it.

Couldn’t have happened to a more deserving person. 

Not necessarily.  It say the frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter as a byproduct of anal sex.  Anal sex could take place between same sex partners as well.  

 You are a POOSEY, but you’re also right about that.  Google is getting charged for anti-trust.  Obama isn’t doing Google any favors at all. 

It doesn’t matter, the free market has spoken.  Don’t cry if it doesn’t favor you.  Now you’re playing class warfare.  

 Who Santorumed in your Cherios?

 LOL I would rather be a piece of shit than a Santorum.  A piece of shit is just one aspect of a Santorum that makes it nasty.  There’s also some lube involved, and some froth. 

Now I’m sad because you’re not going to get the help you need. DAMN YOU JESUS!!!!

Once again,

Piece of Shit > Santorum

By definition.  

Once again,

Piece of Shit > Santorum

By definition.  

Not being a rapist, or involved with rapists, I have no idea how the criminal justice system treats rape victims. But I have seen how Slick Willey called all of his trailer trash rape victims liars! Didn’t Hillary say it was a “vast right-wing conspiracy” against Slick Willey, abandoning her sisterhood? Santorum feels the same exact way you do about the homosexual, predatory, rapist, sodomite priests. Yet no one here realizes that. You liberals seem to agree that what Savage is doing to Santorum is ok based on your feelings and hatred for the right, when you displayed no hatred for Slick Willey!

Funny how you will not condemn islam, as an INSTITUTION that subjugates women, kills homosexuals like Savage, and is actively working to destroy Israel and America bu the use of terrorism!

Telling women how to dress? ow about women being responsible for their actions and their own safety? Maybe they should acquire a license to carry a firearm! It is their Constitutional right. Maybe you want to check those facts on rapists too. How many are let go to re-offend by liberals?

Have you been to any city public school system and paid attention to how the females dress themselves? Where are the parents? Babydaddy “ain’t” around, and babymomma “ain’t” interested! Have you seen the day care centers at the school for the kids of the girls who dress provocatively? It wasn’t God’s plan for them to spit out kids before marriage, which is better than killing an innocent and unborn victim of the “girl’s” actions. Why do liberals enjoy and justify killing the unborn?

Check this out…

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/file/2008-mug-shots-year?page=19

Depends if you “prepare” for the act.

Look it up!

I do give you credit. At least you admit straight men engage in anal sex with women. Quite common actually. Lots of gay bashers/haters refuse to acknowledge this fact.

Adult human beings are imaginative sexual creatures. Always have been, always will be.

For all those who feel sorry for Rick Santorum, please realize there is a reason Dan Savage named this byproduct “Santorum”.

Rick Santorum has said many hateful, ugly and bigoted things about GLBT people in his political career up to the present. Santorum shows absolutely no respect to GLBT people, so why should Rick expect to get respect back?

Exactly.
Santorum (to use his Bible) reaps what he sows.
Santorum has said many downright evil things about GLBT people. He deserves Dan Savage’s label.
People need to “fight back” against this sort of bigotry. Humor is an effective way.

Could be a byproduct of certain acts associated with “Femdom”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_dominance

A woman using a “device” on a man for example.

RUN ZOD RUN! A fast typist is an accurate typist. You are neither. Jesus’ proper name was “Jesus of Nazareth” or “Son of God”. No H in there, you blasphemous hater. Cnd Christ was not the last name, as Christ was the title. As in Jesus the Christ…

Now you admit to shopping at the evil Wal-Mart! I’m sending a copy of this post to attackwatch! You are a liberal, therefore you are a hypocrite, an elitist, and judgmental. Your desire to explain it proves it! Like the white guilt all liberals share and you seem to consistently affirm!

Dude? Seriously, segregation in the 80′s? The 1980′s or the 1880′s? In 1980 no one gave a shit about racism, themselves, or the past! Cocaine, Heroin, electric/techno/pop music and money! You talk shit like you lived in Watts during the 1965 race riots or that you were next to Rodney King in the 1992 LA riots! Does Mickey Mouse beat the crap out of you or what? I’ll bet that when your high school did desegregate, you were afraid for your life by being forced to live and learn among “those people!”

Only a Savage fanatic would require Santorum Away. Hope you get all of those stains off of yourself, retard. Self proclaimed weather-data geek.

When online you go, this post will be here for you.

Haha, I like how Santorum seems to think the google search results are the only thing stopping him from becoming president.

“The ironic thing about Savage’s childish behavior is that he certainly
makes the “aftermath” of an act inherent to gay male sexual partners to
be rather putrid, no? 

I guess we can presume that many gay
males (and straight males who engage in said behavior) have a bit of
“Santorum” in them, or at least, on them.”

Isn’t that what Heyitzme wrote? Further qualifying it as “putrid”, no?

And yes Heyitzme, I agree, they are making themselves look bad in the process. As are the liberal posters here….

Really? Guess that depends on what the definition of the word “is” is, huh liberal?

Homosexuality is NOT a civil right. And black people tend to agree, and are insulted by the comparison.

http://www.crrange.com/wall34.html

Note to every one else.  Don’t “spout off about LGBT” issues lest you wish for them to execute a public campaign of derision against you of such a vile nature as to force it to become a free-speech issue.  Consequences shall be had.  Don’t even think to get in the way of efforts to normalize a provably destructive alternative lifestyle in the interest of widening a net of easily accessible and obtainable lovers.

Bully behavior, these “activists” possess, to the bone.

What “rights” again, are you all up in a tizzy over?  Nobody is telling you who you can’t bugger, unless you have your eyes on kids.  The right to be loud and objectionable, if that’s it, isn’t exactly enumerated, but would probably fall under the 1st Amendment.  And nobody is screwing with that.  Except maybe college ‘liberals’ and their attacks on the free speech of college conservatives.  The rights to redefine a fundamental human social institution, then, for your personal convenience?  Redefine it for all people, that is, for equality under the law already exists for everybody.

I found my economy size bottle of Santorum Away. Awesome!

Stands for Jesus Holy Christ. My Grandmother used it a lot. Term has
been used for hundreds of years. I am not a Christian, so blasphemous
words do not bother me.

Regarding Racism, man you are naive. How old are you? Seriously. You are stereotyping the 1980′s. BTW I said 1971. I am 40 years old. Have you ever been to the deep South? Regarding music, where I grew up the most popular music was country music, not the music you mentioned (for Whites at least) I grew up in small town Florida, not St Marks Square NYC or Seattle WA. I was not in danger in my small town (Blacks unfortunatly were sometimes), but  riots did take place in Florida (Liberty City, multiple riots when R.K was shot, St Pete FL riot, etc) Interracial dating was taboo at my high school and fights would break out when it happened (changed rapidity at the school after graduation).

America is a diverse place. your experience was not mine. Considering we live in a country of 310 million people on half a continent this is to be expected.

That’s a matter of opinion, which you of course are entitled to.

I strongly disagree… as does a growing percentage of the population…. as does the younger 35 and below generation overwhelmingly.

Sexuality is every bit as innate as a person’s race and this is supported by every reputable health in mental health organization around.

I am aware of the a lot of The African American Community feeling that way and I find that sad, they don’t have a monopoly on civil rights and of all people should know what it feels like to be treated as second class citizens, that’s not to say that LGBT people have it as badly as they did… we clearly don’t, this however isn’t a contest and discrimination is discrimination and intolerance intolerance.

Also make no mistake, they don’t all feel that way.

“Gay and lesbian people have families, and their families should have
legal protection, whether by marriage or civil union,” she said. “A
constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriages is a form of
gay
bashing and it would do nothing at all to protect traditional
marriages.”

Coretta Scott King

For too long, our nation has tolerated the insidious form of
discrimination against this group of Americans, who have worked as hard
as any other group, paid their taxes like everyone else, and yet have
been denied equal protection under the law…I believe that freedom and
justice cannot be parceled out in pieces to suit political convenience.
My husband, Martin Luther King, Jr. said, “Injustice anywhere is a
threat to justice everywhere.” On another occasion he said, “I have
worked too long and hard against segregated public accommodations to end
up segregating my moral concern. Justice is indivisible.” Like Martin, I
don’t believe you can stand for freedom for one group of people and
deny it to others.

Coretta Scott King

Now three quotes from Julian Bond, former Chairman of The NAACP

That’s when I’m asked if gay rights are civil rights, my answer is always: “Of course they are.””Gay
and lesbian rights are not special rights in any way. It isn’t special
to be free from discrimination. It is an ordinary, universal entitlement
of citizenship. The right not to be discriminated against is a
commonplace claim we all expect to enjoy under our laws and our founding
document, the constitution. That many had to struggle to gain those
rights does make them precious, but it does not make them special. And
it does not reserve them only for me, or restrict them from others. And
they should never be subject to popular votes.”

“For
some people, comparisons between the African-American civil rights
movement and the movement for gay and lesbian rights seems to diminished
the long, black historical struggle with all its suffering, sacrifices,
and endless toil. However, people of color ought to be flattered that
our movement has provided so much inspiration for others, that has been
so widely imitated, that our tactics, our methods, our heroes, our
heroines, even our songs, have served as models for others.”

“No
parallel between movements is exact. African-Americans are the only
Americans who were enslaved for more than two centuries. And people of
color carry the badge of who we are on our faces. But we are far from
the only people suffering discrimination. Sadly, so do many others. They
deserve the law’s protection and civil rights, too.”

There are still many schools in the deep south that have segregated proms.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segregated_prom

If you dislike my link, Google the source documents for yourself.

Shut up Zod.
“A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee,” Cinton told the liberal lion, Ted “the Chappaquiddick Kid” Kennedy from Massachusetts.Kennedy was deeply offended and recounted the conversation to friends with fury. After Kennedy sided with Obama, Clinton reportedly griped, “the only reason you are endorsing him is because he’s black. Let’s just be clear.”

“Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada described in private then-Sen. Barack Obama as “light skinned” and “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.”

As for homosexuals:
Despite the fact that both the Senate and the House in Iowa failed in attempts to bring a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage up for a vote last week, four Democratic state senators have since signed on with anti-gay forces, the Iowa Independent reports:  “Four Democratic state senators — Dennis Black of Grinnell, Keith Kreiman of Bloomfield, Rich Olive of Story City and Joe Seng of Davenport — broke with their party and signed on to a Republican petition to force a vote on same-sex marriage.”

Jim “I am a homosexual American” McGreevey suggested that President Obama and the First Lady don’t share the same views on homosexual marriage and then said, “If he (the President) could only listen to Michelle more often” when it comes to his stance on same-sex marriage. The White House quickly shot down the suggestion and made clear that Michelle supports her husband’s position against homosexual marriage. —Politico

Hillary Clinton has the same stance on homosexual marriage as her predecessor Condi Rice and former Vice President Dick Cheney!

Laura Bush supports homosexual marriage!

These liberals hate filled too?

It is their 1st amendment right after all.  Are we going to take the 1st amendment away from gays as well? 

Santorum has said no downright evil thing about gay people.  Especially nothing such as to deserve Dan “Savage” Keenan’s conspicuously disgusting and obnoxious on-its-face attention.

the moral certitudes in your missive appears as nothing less than an attempt to promote anti-culture, to swap everything that is generally considered good and evil and turn it on it’s ear, as is in the interest of many pushers of the gay agenda.

 It sort of does.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is

Tiffany Marie,

Calcat36 is a troll. For some reason I feed him on occasion. Sometimes you can discuss things with him, other times it is like talking to a brick wall. Don’t take him too seriously.

He looks like Steve Carell in the above picture. If he’s so concerned about it, he should just change his name.  Or does he like the name recognition of “Santorum”?

http://spreadingsantorum.com/

Sorry but that’s sort of NASSSSSSSSSSSSSTYYYYYYYYYYYYYY.

“Rick Santorum keeps a framed photo of his son Gabriel Michael, the fourth of his
seven children. Named for two archangels, Gabriel Michael was born
prematurely, at 20 weeks, on Oct. 11, 1996, and lived two hours outside
the womb.

Upon their son’s death, Rick and Karen Santorum opted not to bring his body to a funeral home. Instead, they bundled him in a blanket and drove him to Karen’s
parents’ home in Pittsburgh. There, they spent several hours kissing and
cuddling Gabriel with his three siblings, ages 6, 4 and 1 1/2. They
took photos, sang lullabies in his ear and held a private Mass.

He and Karen brought Gabriel’s body home so their children could “absorb and understand that they had a brother,”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61804-2005Apr17.html

Santorum has said no hateful, ugly or bigoted things about gay people.  Especially nothing such as to deserve Dan “Savage” Keenan’s conspicuously disgusting and obnoxious on-its-face attention.

The moral certitudes in your missives appears as nothing less than an attempt to promote anti-culture, to swap everything that is generally considered good and evil and turn it on it’s ear, as is in the interest of many pushers of the gay agenda.  I’m not inclined to portray things in such polarized, black and white terms as good and evil, yet if I were – Respectful and principled opposition, supported (but by no means exclusively) as the are by appeals to biblical authority, to the agenda of those who push a provably destructive lifestyle (good) – “fighting back” with lack of respect and scatological imagery (evil). Standing strong for natural social institutions of normal familial relationships found in all cultures since antiquity (good) – the inveterate bigotry of those who would tear it down for their own convenience (evil).

Hey, Civil Rights were the cornerstone of the black community and instrumental in forcing southern democrats to accept blacks as humans, and we even fought a war over it. Homosexuality is NOT a civil right, no matter how you try to spin it in your defective liberal mind. Blacks were not considered to be fully human, and no one has made that claim against homosexuals. Homosexuals are free to marry. They are free to vote. They are free to drink from any bubbler they choose. They have never had to sit in the back of the bus. They have never been lynched by democrat klansmen. They have never been sold into slavery.

It is not a contest, nor is it the equivalent, yet homosexuals always attempt to equate personal sexual preferences to the struggle for civil rights, and that is wrong. Destroyng the religious implications of marriage institution is the homosexual agenda, as is the goal of destroying the military institution. Those institutions have capitulated to the agenda. What will homosexuals feel slighted about next?

The NAACP was started by white folks. Mary White Ovington, journalist William English Walling and Henry Moskowitz, a Jew, met in New York City in January 1909 and the NAACP was born. Again, “typical white folks” looking out for their brothers.

NO PARALLEL exists between civil rights and homosexual demands for marriage equality. And why is it that homosexuals have to throw their sexuality in everyone’s way? How about doing it in a mosque? There would be plenty of blacks there who would share your sensibilities… They may even want to stone you to death, as their religion of peace demands. I suggest that you take on the muslims and force them to “lean forward” on your homosexual agenda… But please, record it for us to see…

Thought it was off line time for you? Mommy is going to be upset.

Thought it was off line time for you? Mommy is going to be upset.

Deep southern Florida? Minnie can’t bring Pluto to the prom?

Go cry now Zod.

Deep southern Florida? Minnie can’t bring Pluto to the prom?

Go cry now Zod.

Only if you are a serial rapist democrat president. Put some ice on it Glutton.

Using Santorum’s bible to look up Sodom and Gomorrah… Oh here it is…
Sodom and Gomorrah have also been used as metaphors for vice and homosexuality viewed as a deviation. The story has therefore given rise to words in several languages, including the English word “sodomy”, used in so-called sodomy laws to describe a sexual “crime against nature” consisting of oral or anal sex, either homosexual or heterosexual.Guess God fought back against the deviant homosexuals, huh? In quite a funny way! Fire and brimstone!

Comparing GLBT people with pedophilia and bestiality is downright evil in my book.

Rick Santorum has the 1st Amendment right to say what he says. Dan
Savage also has the 1st Amendment right to use the word Santorum the way
he is using it.

I have no problem with the traditional family. I have no problem with Gay marriage either. Society can have both. And just because I support GLBT rights does not mean I believe everyone should “become” GLBT.

Homosexuals are free to say whatever they want. The Amendment does not guarantee the right to be heard or listened to! Why is it that all militant homosexuals have to wear their homosexuality on their sleeve, declare it to those of us who really don’t care, and then get angry when they are told to just go away because no one needs to hear about all of their imagined struggles?

How old are you dude?

BTW, Florida is more than Disney and South Florida. Florida does exist north of Tampa and Orlando. All the way to Georgia and Alabama. I guess Florida is one big stereotype to you.

Well, looked at the comments here, and most seem to be missing the point, or resorting to deplorable ad hominem attacks. The simple truth is that Google dominates the sector it competes in. It cannot and should not engage in censorship unless the speech is in violation o f the law. On a practical note, think of the precedent this would set, deleting offensive speech. It cannot do this practically, and it should not do it morally. Freedom of speech means tolerating speech that is offensive. Here, though, we have an individual (Santorum) who equated the recognition of gays rights to marry with a slippery slope argument that we would soon be forced to recognize marriages between people and goats. This is patently absurd as are most slippery slope arguments. Santorum chose to engage in a fight, and he is getting his fight. He has no more right to demand Google remove this post than any other person, celebrity, politician, or common man.  Welcome to America, one of the few countries to recognize unfettered free speech. We should applaud their actions, not because Dan Savage’s comments are desirable, but because we should not engage in censorship more generally. Dan Savage’s attack is disgusting, but it is free speech. I am thankful that the Google recognizes and protects free speech, but I also understand that the practicality of censoring this speech is simply impractical from a business standpoint. BTW, as to the Law of Gravity, no one, even Newton could prove it. We know it is there by implication derived from observations, but we have yet to find gravitons, or define precisely the force responsible for gravity. In science, there are rarely absolutes, or laws. What we have are the product of probabilities, i.e. something, a proposition, is more probable than not, defined within what are known as confidence intervals. We cannot say man is responsible for global warming conclusively. What we can say is that it is much, much more probable than not. This is about as good as it gets in science. I for one would prefer to live in a world that embraces science over mysticism. So, in short, flat-landers please shut up so we can try and make our world a better, safer place. I won’t name names, but you dummies know who I am referring to. 

Paleoconservatarian,

Tiffany Marie is 100 percent correct.

And no, I am not GLBT.

Excuse me liberal retard, but have we ever met? You sure do run your fingers over that keyboard as if you have the authority while making silly assumptions.

I call you a retard because the title fits. You are the self proclaimed weather geek crunching data. Why do you reach out for support? Can’t stand on your own? Grow a pair and address me personally. You don’t feed me, retard, you post stupid things you cannot backup, you play the role of psychoanalyst, and you beg posters to be on your side.

And as you have already posted, you have a lifetime supply of Santorum Away to help you remove all of those lubricated fecal stains all over yourself. The sky was red as the sun set this evening. It means we will have a warm day tomorrow and was spectacular. As any self respecting weather geek would tell you, a blue sky can give way to red! Sometimes even purple, you retard!

You cannot discuss anything with me. Your discussions and stupid posts are once again, just proven false. Crunch that data retard.

Unfortunately, you have lived outside the womb for over 40 years. Retard.

Liberals believe that they can pick up a turd by the “clean” end…

People like Calcat36 and a few other posters here make me think Rev.Jeremiah Wright was on the money with much of what he said. I see where Rev. Wright was coming from.

No, you are the stereotype, retard. Again, you talk like you are in Watts and down for da skruggle of yo’ peeps…. Segregated Proms… Ok. Big, Big problem facing society today. So why would the black folks not want to go to the prom with the typical white folks again? You talk like you were a victim of Misissippi Burning, then you come back with segregated proms in the south. You are a douchebag.

Homosexual priests were indeed, pedophiles. The liberal left did all they could to bury that fact.

Let me remind you that you are talking about a 22 year, combat decorated, former US Marine. You can take your “revered wright” (who was also a Marine) and shove him where your head is currently located. You assume too much you liberal retard, and you type shit that makes no sense. When did you serve?

I shudder to think how you would deal with sharia law if it takes hold down there in your deep, dark south.
Address me directly you liberal panty waste. People like you confirm the fact that the public school system is a failure and only indoctrinates the weak minded fools like you in the religion of liberalism.

Isn’t it past your log-on time? You typed that you were outta here hours ago….

I do not like to engage in ad hominem attacks, but I am curious which version of the bible did Calcat36 read? Your remarks are vile, and totally non-christian. Christ believed in turning the other cheek, and he advocated ideas which are far more liberal than conservative. I personally despise both parties, but I am sincerely confused at how the people who claim to be Christian so easily accept and engage in vile attacks. Do you really think the sick, twisted comments you have stated here would be acceptable to Jesus? He was a profound moral influence on our culture. His teachings were fascinating, and made more fascinating by the circumstances he found himself enduring. I cannot possibly think that such a profound, pacifist character such as Jesus would condone your vile commentary. I urge you to revisit the bible, to rethink the hate you engage in, and to accept Jesus into your heart. I assure you he would not look favorably upon the anger and hatred you so readily embrace. You are a hypocrite, and a Christian in name alone, not in practice. Please go back to church. You have failed to embrace Jesus’ thoughts and beliefs. Jesus preached against hatred, while you embrace it. How does your mind reconcile this obvious contradiction? I hate to engage in conjecture, but I suspect you have a high school education at best, and you probably didn’t do well there in any event. Please, find peace. Please listen to what Jesus really said. If you did so, you would be ashamed of yourself. Pour on the anonymous hate, I’m sure your god would approve.

I think it’s fair, to be honest. It’s one thing to disagree with people but what he’s said about homosexuals isn’t fact or logic-based it’s just hateful bullshit. So, if Santorum wants to publicaly slander these people, he shouldn’t be surprised if there is some retaliation..

I think the real problem he has is that he can’t just buy off google, if he could this news story wouldn’t exist.

Google “Santorum”

Nobody’s questioning Santorum’s right to be and asshole. Just because you have the right to free speech doesn’t mean we won’t call you out when you say stupid things. 

You’ve got too much time on your hands. Stop fantasizing and go for a walk !

Nobody wants to touch you

why? for what reason?

No, actually the Michelle Obama pictures were a concerted effort exactly like the Santorum google. And there were probably 16 of the first 30 pictures that made her look like a monkey.

So I think the point is made that they are indeed not ‘playing ball’ with any political group.

There isn’t really a debate about evolution. There are the facts and there are those who don’t believe the facts.

There’s a Christian site called ‘Proof of Evolution’ – maybe that’ll help you through:
http://www.proof-of-evolution.com/
I like their opening line:
I don’t believe there’s any reason to resort to lying, deceit, or intellectual dishonesty. God made everything! And his handiwork, according to the Bible, shows his glory; it doesn’t take away from it!

In other words, God doesn’t need us to protect him from proof of evolution. He certainly doesn’t want us to lie in his defense. He can take care of himself.

Only those “sensitive” liberals would get off on such filth.  Their immorality has no bounds.  Once they successfully push through their gay agenda, believe me, they’ll begin pushing for the legalization of pedophilia.

‘Once they successfully push through their gay agenda, believe me, they’ll begin pushing for the legalization of pedophilia.’

…You’re really going for the ‘push’ imagery aren’t you!

It doesn’t read like you really bothered to think that through to the conclusion. You’ve tail ended it with two unrelated fear mongering extreme suggestions. It’s probably your erroneous fear of anything gay or less than extreme macho. The choices are becoming difficult because they are free to express themselves is that it?

You could on one hand dress macho and ‘they may be attracted’ or you could dress ‘sportingly’, again they may be attracted or perhaps you will be and they won’t.

Should you embrace that fear with open arms? Apparently they’re just people ask Michele Bachmann’s husband…maybe not…

It’s a scary new world, but be brave.

Google is only interested in the money.  Anyone can have their website pushed to the front of the Search Engine if they pay enough. Contact them and they will tell you how much it will cost you.

“TMP”

GOOGLE,
I guess anything goes with you.   No class!!  Rick, ignore Savage and Google.
Delores Smith
Delores109@cox.net

The irony of the whole Santorum controversy, is that the man really, really doesn’t have a clue how primitive, simple, bigoted, hateful his reasoning is….. not only on homosexuality, but many other topics as well.  He’s like the loud-mouth garbage man on lunch break, shooting off his mouth on every imaginable topic while sitting in a local diner.  No smarts, no sophistication; just boorish stupid comments that offend people.  And he doesn’t have a clue why people don’t like him.

Santorum is allowed his free speech.. an individual cannot infringe on another’s free speech.. and there is no constitutional protection from someone giving you crap for your viewpoint.. the constitution only protects people from the government infringing on your right to speak how you feel.  But, if you open your mouth you better be prepared for someone doing something about it that you may not like.

No one is saying Santorum is responsible for Savage’s actions.  And it’s wasn’t Savage that created the definition that he popularized.. it was a reader that entered a contest on Savage’s online Savage Love web page.  The readers voted and that definition won the contest.  All Savage did was provide the web space for the new definition of Santorum.

And your comparisons have nothing in common with what happened in this case.

WOW! You just sold me Calcat. You are truly a freakin idiot! That’s what you resort to? We’re the bad guys because we believe in science? LMAO! Why don’t you go pray the stupid away and see how well that works out for you. Jesus Christ!!!

If by “class” you mean falsifying search results so that pissant Santorum’s feelings don’t get hurt, then I’m happy to have a classless Google on my desktop.

Santorum is the victim of his own big mouth, and if he doesn’t like the results his big mouth brings him, perhaps he should shut up.

What “sensitive” liberals get off on is watching sanctimony receiving its just reward.

Santorum is a deeply offensive prig who never figured out that his hateful views aren’t shared by everyone. Maybe he’s finally realizing it. He is pretty slow on the uptake, though.

And mentioning Santorum’s rather unusual (and illuminating) behavior is retarded how?

Well, that was a profoundly stupid post. Hmmm. What’s another term for profoundly stupid? I had it right on the tip of my tongue . . .

Do you use an online dweeb-o-meter to generate this gibberish or are you native gibberish-speaker?

Soooo… the negative Michelle Obama picture that are no longer returned in relation to Google’s refusal to do a similar thing in regards to Santorum is supportive evidence of your theory?   OhhhhK

“Militant homosexuals” presumably militate on purpose — to be heard. To do so probably requires wearing one’s concerns on one’s sleeve and declaring those concerns to the general populace (including those who don’t care).

And just because *you* think “no one needs to hear” doesn’t actually mean that no one needs to hear. It only means that you personally are deaf.

I don’t care if you are or not – not that I intoned that you were.

As to Tiffany Marie being 100% correct… I disagree.

Note to anyone: If you spout off about your hateful prejudices, you are likely to be scorned. If you have the profile of a sitting senator and a soi-disant saviour of public morals, then you’re likely letting yourself in for extra scorn.

Don’t like scorn? Don’t say hateful things. Don’t like same-sex marriage? Don’t marry someone of the same sex. We’re not talking rocket science here.

Gay people are oppressing poor widdle Ricky and poor widdle Micky? My heart fuckin’ bleeds.

Perhaps it would be helpful to their spiritual growth to experience genuine prejudice and denial of human rights. Might make ‘em both a bit more humble.

And less reluctant to demonize their fellow citizens.

Sadly, I think Santorum and Bachmann are unreachable.

Yes, the suppression of human rights experienced by gay people is somewhat different than the suppression of human rights experienced by black people in the United States over the last 400 years.

So?

Your opinion as to what is and isn’t a human right is meaningless. Stating that something is flatly wrong doesn’t lend your argument any strength. Your inability to find parallels tells us a lot about you but nothing about the issue.

Bottom line: you’ve bought into the fallacy that whatever you don’t like must be wrong.

But the world doesn’t work that way.

No one tried to bury the fact — outside of the church’s attempt (for decades) to pretend that the abuse was not happening at all.

Your statement is half a bald-faced lie and half irrelevant. That pretty much characterizes every post you’ve put up in this thread.

I think we’ve got you pegged: a meaningless liar.

You failed to provide any links in support of what Santorum said
that was “evil” – not even to a site that skewed the context for you.. 
Instead, you provided a characterization of your own construct, as well as repeating the allegation.  Try again.

“Normal familial relationships” has almost universally translated into the paired-gender, monogamous family.  Formed in every culture; even those in which natural geographic barriers prevented casual cultural contact.  And in any case, transsexualism is not ‘a familial relationship’ so much as it is a style of dress and gender roles that may or may not indicate sexual preferences, though I see a conference in 1990 (influenced by the modern pushers of the gay agenda?  Oh, I think maybe so) decided otherwise.  Have gays existed?  To have said otherwise was not a contention anyone made.  So were gay relationships in native cultures the norm?  No.  You are confusing your arguments.

Once more, there’s no such thing as “gay marriage” which can exist side by side with “hetero marriages.”  That’s double-think.  Marriage is a concept by itself, not something that can be divided at will.  Let’s try such out in regards to other “institutions.”  How about the institution of “gay slavery” and “hetero slavery.”  Is there a philosophical difference?  No.  Any person existing under bondage is a slave.  You may as well try to get away with “left-handed marriages” as a separate concept.  Its ridiculous.

expatpatriot,
Do you falsify search results?  I have no idea who you are, and could care less, because you are filled with jealousy and hate.  If I do not address you, consider yourself invisible.   My comment was to Google, and they should have the good judgment to avoid printing trash on their site.  I’m talking about what borders on Porn.  Stop attacking me, or I will slide out of my computer and punch you in the nose.
Delores Smith

You are not “people.”  You are “some people.”  I’m not for Santorum, but he was liked by enough people to send him to Washington for a a decade.

In any case, appeal to popularity refuted.  How about you bring something else next time – something other than to just call stances with which you disagree “hate?”

If by “attack” you mean point out when you spout nonsense, I’m afraid you’ll have to take your chances.

You’ll also have to take the chance that when you “comment to Google” they don’t actually pay attention to you.

Trust me, they don’t.

Especially when you — who if I’m not mistaken have not founded and are not running a multimultibillion-dollar enterprise — attempt to define “good judgment” for them. I’m pretty sure they trust their judgment over yours. I know I do.

I’m still trying to puzzle out “If I do not address you, consider yourself invisible.” Are you trying to wish me into nonexistence? You’ll find that type of magical thinking is about as effective as your threat to assault me from your keyboard.

Does your family know you have these sorts of fantasies? I think you might want to talk to someone about that.

If by “attack” you mean point out when you spout nonsense, I’m afraid you’ll have to take your chances.

You’ll also have to take the chance that when you “comment to Google” they don’t actually pay attention to you.

Trust me, they don’t.

Especially when you — who if I’m not mistaken have not founded and are not running a multimultibillion-dollar enterprise — attempt to define “good judgment” for them. I’m pretty sure they trust their judgment over yours. I know I do.

I’m still trying to puzzle out “If I do not address you, consider yourself invisible.” Are you trying to wish me into nonexistence? You’ll find that type of magical thinking is about as effective as your threat to assault me from your keyboard.

Does your family know you have these sorts of fantasies? I think you might want to talk to someone about that.

NOW I want to get the beeper number of your supplier.

I’d call it an act of defiance against a bully rather than bullying behavior. Santorum’s voice reached much further than Savage’s did. Rick was the bully.

With regard to the actual stigmatization of Santorum (random thought: I’d think someone of Santorum’s ilk would *luuuuve* stigmatization — what would prove his worthiness to lead better? But that’s just me.) … in any case, it’s perfectly apt to name the scorned person with something they scorn. That’s what makes the joke so perfect.

Being hoist by one’s own petard — in this case his own big-mouthed bigotry — is the ideal punishment for the crime.

It’s still there. There’s lots of them. Sooooo……..

It’s still there. There’s lots of them. Sooooo……..

expatpatriot
You are really sick.   What I meant is don’t address me and annoy me, but I can take care of this myself. I did not sign up for Disqus, and I’m wasting my time responding to people who are only here to insult people.   I was going to contact Disqus to ask them to remove me from Disqus, but I came up with a better idea….I am giving you full custody of http://www.mediate.com. I don’t evem want visitation rights.  I guarantee you I’m going to take America back in spite of people like you.  Count on it.
Delores Smith 

Mediaite Mods! Did you notice that Delores Smith (above) has granted me “full custody” of Mediaite?

This is great! How do I tell you where to send the money? (You do make *some* money, I trust.)

For all of you who support Savage’s clearly disturbed & devious behavior…what’s your last name?  How about your grandma’s?  So now by some people’s logic we can post websites that harass people in sexually vile ways if we disagree with them?  Can we post sexually explicit signs in front of their house?  It’s the world wide web and hundreds of people have the last name Santorum.  Please research Savage thoroughly before you elevate him to your idol.

Nice try, but not many are naive enough to buy this sort of demagoguery, I trust.

Quid pro quo does makes sense, but only when the actions in question are of the same sort: you punch me, I punch you back, it’s self defense. You yell at me, I punch you, it is not self defense.

This utterly simple fact immediately eliminates your nonsensical comparison to a woman raped because she wore a short skirt and a couple others. Santorum’s whining is more akin to a woman complaining because when she wore a short skirt, someone else wore an even shorter skirt. Or maybe an equally short one, but their legs were much more attractive.

You are also BSing about Lewisky; she was not a victim in any sense; she wanted something and got it. Granted, given that what she wanted was to do the president, and given who was president at the time, that was hardly a difficult task, but still, she succeeded.

Now my own two cents aimed at those who side with Santorum: Santorum says homosexuals are evil, he actively tries to deny them basic human rights, would, for example, deny them the right to get citizenship for their loved ones, visit them in hospital when they are dying, adopt a baby, and over a 1,000 more specific rights.

And Dan Savage is making fun of him. Oh boohoo.

And you and your ilk keep fussing about one of these two people being unsavory, and I don’t know what the hell kind of short circuit there must be in your brains that you somehow pick not the guy who would vilify and persecute innocent humans, but rather the one who talks back at him.