USA Today to Charge for Content; Expects Increase in Revenue and Readership!
America’s largest circulation newspaper, USA Today, is to introduce a paid-for digital version in August in an attempt to boost flagging revenue, compensate for a decline in advertising income and stem falling readership.
The new publisher of the Gannett-owned title, David Hunke, said the digital edition would be emailed daily to subscribers for $10 per month, dropping the price from the existing $13.95 per month and introducing new features.
The move is part of a drive to increase revenues and readership, with Hunke also pledging to take on the Wall Street Journal plan of targeting business readers in hotel rooms.
Final plans have clearly not yet been finalized, because Hunke couldn’t say whether the digital edition would be free to existing print subscribers or extra. But he did say that he regrets not charging for the paper’s iPhone app. While the site is likely to remain free, services that add value, like a digital edition or iPhone and Android mobile products could be charged for.
“I’m not sure we realized what we had,” said Burke. “I think that’s a value readers will be willing to pay for.”
USA Today’s ad revenues fell 36% in the first quarter of this year, while circulation was down 7% to 2.11m for October to March.
Tiger’s Interview Charade Reveals More About “Sports Journalism”

Let's get some things straight -- Tiger Woods five-minute interviews on Sunday with ESPN's Tom Rinaldi and the Golf Channel's Kelly Tilghman were just the next phase of the carefully planned PR charade to prepare for his return to golf at The Masters. But more important, it was another step to regain control of the situation. While apparently there were no restrictions set on the questions, the interviewers were confined to five minutes with Woods. That's right, five measly minutes. What a joke. At this point, five hours wouldn't suffice.
Glenn Beck Puts The ‘SanFran Radicals’ Responsible For HCR On Notice
It's likely no one will benefit more immediately from yesterday's HCR vote than Glenn Beck. Beck tweeted out earlier this morning what I can only assume is a preview of what's to come on his show between now and November. I'm not entirely clear on who the "60's sanfran radicals" are...I'm guessing Nancy Pelosi?
More Online headlines:
»David Axelrod: Health Care Vote More Meaningful Than Election Night »9
»President Obama On Health Care: “This Is What Change Looks Like” »19
»Charles Krauthammer On Health Care Bill: ‘It Will Never Be Repealed’ »29
»Rahm Emanuel Thinks Washington Is Working Just Fine »1
»Expect To See A Lot More Hugh Grant Love On Fox News »1
© 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives
| Dan Abrams, Founder
| Hosting by Datagram
|
RSS






















» Login » Register