1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser
Advertisement

Whoops! New York Times And Washington Post Use Same Front Page Image

» 10 comments

Man, so many east coast elites are going to be so confused today!

It doesn’t happen all too often, but, whenever news outlets accidentally use the same picture on their cover, it’s always pretty funny. Today, The New York Times and the Washington Post both decided to fill their front page with that the exact photo of a flooded New Jersey street. This kind of thing (which happens every once in a while) must suck for the papers. It really sucks for whomever owns the truck.

The only person it doesn’t suck for? The photographer. Ka-ching!

(h/t Patrick W. Gavin, images via Newseum)

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • http://twitter.com/DrivelLady Laurie B.

    People still buy newspapers?

  • Anonymous

    How gauche! Someone has to change their outfits!

  • Anonymous

    To be fair, one’s more orange than the other.

  • Anonymous

    Wow, Jon! There’s so much misinformation in your short post, I don’t even know where to begin.

    First of all, newspapers don’t have “covers” … they have front pages.

    Secondly, it’s not an “accident” – as you put it – when two newspapers…or 5 or 25 newspapers use the same photo. It’s called photo editing. Photo editors decide to use a photo over another based on the merits of the photo. The possibility that another newspaper may use it doesn’t factor into the decision.

    Lastly, you imply that the photographer made more money because it was used in both papers.  Do you know ANYTHING about the media? The image was supplied by the Reuters wire service which pays photographers a day rate. The photographer gets the same rate no matter how many newspapers use the image.

  • L_Salazar

    Now that is a B.F.Deal (quoting the VP)

  • Anonymous

    …and there is absolutely, positively 100% NO COLLUSION OR CONSPIRACY BETWEEN THE lamestream socialist fake-news media. None, Zip, Nada, Zero, Zilch.

  • Anonymous

    If you are offering this as proof that there is some sort of collusion in the mainstream media, you are 1) Incredibly stupid, and/or  2) sadly misinformed. I’m guessing from your comment that you watch nothing but FOX news, which would explain everything. Idiot.

  • Anonymous

    The two top left wing rags are constantly caught spooning, just now we’ve got irrefutable proof.

  • http://twitter.com/Darr247 Darr Darr

    If they were colluding, why is the Post’s version cropped more?

    Anyway, why hasn’t faux newz caught onto how mother nature keeps sheeting on states with republican governors…  wild fires, droughts, earthquakes, hurricanes… all happening in states with repugnantone control of the executive branch. Nice of her to downgrade Irene to tropical storm just as it hit NY. You guys need your paranoid loon and his chalkboard back to keep you up-to-speed on why god does these things.

  • Gnusart

    Why do you think this is so unusual? It happens all the time, and even more frequently now that news organizations have pared down their photo staffs. 

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram