The Awl Ironically Plays The Twitter Race Card, Goes Bust
For those of you not ‘in the know,’ The Awl is a Gawker Alumni Blog/Pirate Ship run by former Gawkerers Choire Sicha and Alex Balk. For the most part, I like the site, and read it every day. In particular, I think that contributors Natasha Vargas-Cooper and Abe Sauer should get medals for the thoughtful, long-form work that they frequently turn out.
But I was offended — unironically, actually offended — by an Awl post this morning titled “What Were Black People Talking About On Twitter Last Night?”
At the risk of getting randomly harshed on by Tumblr: it was kind of racist.
Here is the post in 5 bullet points:
- Choire Sicha, like “some of you other white people,” is obsessed with “Late Night Black People Twitter.”
- On older social networks, white people did not know what was going on outside of their “stupid little bubble[s],” but now, thanks to Twitter, they are privy to the conversations of others, including the conversations of black people.
- A confusing, seemingly random conflict and reversal:
A friend and I were talking the other day about why, in particular, Black People Twitter happens at night. In fact, it’s the other way around: White People Twitter for the most part happens during the American daytime. Black People Twitter happens all the time.
Aha!
- Nick Douglas has an unnamed friend — a “poor dumb friend” — who had the overtly offensive (ironic?) straw man theory that “[black] people don’t have real Twitter friends. So they all respond to trending topics.” But not in a bad way! That was just different from what he was used to. Nick shot him down with something that sounded like Bullet Point #2.
- Conclusion: “So really the question is: why does Twitter get so white and boring during the day? Don’t white people do anything at work?”
Here’s the ‘illustration:’
I don’t know Choire personally, though I enjoy his movie criticism. I don’t think that he is a racist — or, really, that it’s fair to brand most people as “racists” in the noun form of the word.
But for all of its casual chumminess, his post was lazy and, well, casually racist. But not that kind of racist. The standard Sociology Class lexicon would use words like “fetishize” and “tokenize” to describe what Sicha is up to; at the very least, the Awl post reeks with fascination about the otherness of these black Twitterers.
The coy “race is a social construct” tag was belied by the great pains to which he went to show that see, he is down with black people. Late Night Black People Twitter is “awesome!” Last night’s #uainthittinthatright was a “very funny” example of a “hilarious chat meme!” Nick Douglas’s “poor dumb friend” is “so obviously wrong” with his bad racist theory! Daytime Twitter is “white and boring!”
To the extent that Sicha drops science in his post, it’s the statistic that 26% of African-Americans online use Twitter while only 19% of Caucasians online do. It might have served him better to bone up on danah boyd, the social media researcher whose work has explored the class and race segregation that plague online communities. Most recently, boyd (she likes lowercase letters) has been focused on the “white flight” from MySpace to Facebook; what’s most pernicious about it, she told The Observer, is the way in which white Facebook users don’t explicitly acknowledge the class and racial divides, but vaguely see the more nonwhite MySpace as trashy and uncultured.
Twitter may break down the barriers to hearing other people’s conversations, but the Awl post inadvertently shows that mutual understanding may be a long way off. If the post had to be boiled down to a single sentence, it would be Bullet Point #2 all over again: “On older social networks, white people did not know what was going on outside of their “stupid little bubble[s],” but now, thanks to Twitter, they are privy to the conversations of others, including the conversations of black people.”
That may be true, and it’s worth pointing out (and, as boyd has shown, it’s a fascinating field of study). But it’s a little rude to be so totally slack-jawed when confronted with people who you think aren’t like you.
The Awl is typically a place I go to find thoughtful and nuanced observations and insights. This was neither.
9 comments
I’m really honored to have my theory on race and technology quoted from my personal blog, but I stress that this is a blog where I write *half-baked scraps of ideas*. I also stress that I totally misrepresented my friend’s observation if I at all implied it was a serious theory. He simply made the mistake of IMing it to me.
Seriously guys, this was not anyone’s thesis. I wrote this theory on my blog. You know what else I put on my blog? A PICTURE OF A FART. http://toomuchnick.com/post/237345037/bullshit-chumblespuzz-proving-that-science
What is offensive is the idea that a person can’t make observations about what they see around them if the people involved are a “minority.” Talk about fetishistic and othering. “You can’t make *that* joke! It’s about a (whisper) black person!”
I hope you can see that there is a big difference between your example of a joke about a “black person,” and theawl’s post that dissects the Twitter feeds of “black people.”
So! Are you telling us how offended you got so we can all see how, uh, down with black people you are?
White people tweet like this.
Black people tweet like this.
That’s all I got. I’m really lazy today. Like a ______! (How you fill in that blank reflects your own personal racism, which I welcome you to share with the club so we can all learn more about each other.)
The post just struck me as classic Choire verbal masturbation. He can be a surpassingly good writer. But like many surpassingly good writers, he likes the sound of the words buzzing about in his brain a little too much, and reveals it with semi-stoned dumbassery like the post in question.
And I keep telling myself that one day I’ll understand why anyone other than Nick Douglas thinks Nick Douglas is funny. So far, I’m up against a wall, though. Still, he is a helluva huckster – would that I could earn all that scratch from cutting and pasting tweets that actually are funny by other people into a book. He may be perplexingly unfunny for someone who seems to define himself in part as a humorist, but Nick is damn sure a good salesman.
How could anyone possibly conclude that Twitter gets “so white and boring during the day” when, during that time, I’m concocting some of my best damn Tweets?
Danah Boyd (I like uppercase letters) sounds like she is on the cutting edge of things people noticed a few years ago.
I can’t wait for her to discover scene kids, uncultured trashy white middleclass suburban naïfs that they are.
That wasn’t Choire’s movie review. Read the byline.
Bill O’Reilly Defends Fox News News VP Who Gave His Tea Party Opinion

Bill O'Reilly spent several segments last night discussing the tea party movement and attempting to defend Fox News VP of News and Washington managing editor Bill Sammon for his blanket statement about the mainstream media's 'hatred' of the partying. It included a contentious interview with Politico executive editor Jim VandeHei, a talk with Brit Hume (who previously held Sammon's job) and a "Talking Points" opening (including some 'original reporting').
Inside the White House Press Corps: CNN’s Ed Henry
CNN Chief White House Correspondent Ed Henry exclusively reveals to Mediaite how to stay on top as a reporter, the effects of the blogosphere on his reporting, the usefulness of his Twitter feed, and he attacks the idea of a liberal media bias.
More Online headlines:
»President Obama’s Nobel Prize Money? It’s Still Waiting For Him To Claim
»Enraged, Rachel Maddow Explains ‘Racist History’ Tea Party Is Embracing »21
»Welcome, @CraigyFerg! Craig Ferguson Joins Twitter »3
»Glenn Beck: Obama Is Like ‘A Real Housewife…At A Louis Vuitton Sample Sale’ »15
»NBC Anticipates Olympian Loss Of Cash In Vancouver »3
© 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives |
RSS






















