1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough

The Gawker Decade: How Gawker Media Defined The 2000s

the aughts
» 7 comments

challenger-approaching

Who will define the next decade in media?

Gawker Media is in a strong position going into the next decade, but online media is still so young, and the barriers to entry are still so low, that its dominance is hardly assured. 400 million pageviews in November is a remarkable, market-defining number, but the number of people on the Internet is growing at a wild rate: it’s not an unassailable moat.

Unless someone royally screws up, Gawker will probably continue to be quite profitable for the foreseeable future. But profitability and leadership are different things. The battle over the best model for a web media is far from over:

  • The snarky, bomb-throwing editorial voice on which Gawker prides itself could be its biggest liability. If the success of hackneyed puppet comedian Jeff Dunham has taught us anything, it’s that a New York/LA sensibility ≠ the pulse of America. People who read blogs right now aren’t the pulse of America either, but that’s changing. A more upbeat sensibility like OnSugar‘s, which the New York Times described as “short, light and sarcasm-free, with big photos and headlines,” could carry the day.

That said, Gawker broadened its focus and brightened its hues a few years ago to anticipate this; the snark factor has significantly dropped since the days of editors Jesse Oxfeld and Jessica Coen. The Nick Denton myth is occasionally overblown, but he does have a knack for foreseeing the big trends.

  • Older powers, which still have the most resources at their disposal, can reemerge. In Hearst’s early days, the New York Times was seen as a dusty old has-been, with a circulation of only 25,000; look at what happened. Given its bulk and age, the Times has done a remarkable job of evolving with the web. Most recently, it has built up a commanding presence in social media, thanks, in part, to digital partnership and social media whiz Soraya Darabi, who is soon to depart the paper for Drop.io. And the upward trending of its blogs — the more than seventy of which the Times is thankfully pruning this year — is further proof of the Times‘ willingness to experiment and innovate.

Ironically, Gawker has been moving in the opposite direction by hiring experienced reporters. Actual reporting, done in an opinionated but informed voice, may be the key to the successful blogging — or is it web publishing? — of the next decade.

  • Cheeky upstarts can materialize, seemingly from nowhere, and shake everything up in short order with new models previously undreamt. Old habits may die hard, but free habits — like which online publications you read — die easier and are reborn easier. Recall that Gawker was founded only in 2002.

Did you hear that Mediaite is launching some new sites, btw?

  • The biggest threat to Gawker — and to journalism — may well be the Demand Media/Associated Content model, which AOL has expressed interest in. That is: churning out thousands of posts a day which are poor on ‘information’ and ‘originality’ and ‘being something a human being would want to read,’ but which are search engine optimized the hell out of to get mountains of traffic from Google and Bing. Demand is expected to bring in $200 million of revenue this year, according to Wired. Search engines could always change up their algorithms in a more user-oriented direction and clean these companies’ clocks — 90% of Associated Content’s traffic comes from search — but these companies will try their darndest to game whatever new criteria emerge.

Update: responding to this article via Twitter, Nick Denton had this to say: “re article on Gawker decade: threat not from robots of Demand Media but charismatic sites like Huffpo and Finke’s.”

Of course, the next decade could still be Gawker’s. The challenges will be substantial, and the Gawker Media of 2019 may not look much like the Gawker Media of 2009. When’s the Chinese edition coming?

But as long as intelligence, snark, hard work, and the occasional character assassination continue to stir the human soul, they’re not a bad bet.

>>>Follow the author of this post on Twitter

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Pages: 1 2

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • abesauer

    Drudge must be fuming. (Or does he think himself above “blog?”)

    Anyway, I find it incredibly ironic that Gawker would receive this award from AdAge. It remains a mystery to me why an advertiser would pay to be on Gawker, a site whose user demographic largely disparages the kind of ad messages often found on the site. Sure the pageviews are there but… How is “snarky” an attractive psychographic to any advertiser? Gizmodo, Jalopnik, Jezebel have much more attractive readers…

  • Robert Quigley

    @abesauer: I read the Gawker award as a roundabout way to recognize Gawker Media as a brand. The techier/geekier blogs got way more votes from readers, Gawker traffic isn’t astonishing, compared to some of what’s out there, and there’s the resistance to advertisers thing you mentioned.

    But in terms of being an ‘influencer’ and coming up with the template by which people write on and for the Internet, Gawker is the pivot point, even as others pilfer and tweak what they’ve done. Hey look, the topic of this post!

  • abesauer

    @Robert. Maybe. I would hazard that part of why this seems true is that the media types who read/write Agweek and Gawker and such blogs THINK this is true because the media they consume has been so influenced. From the Gawker stable I would point to Deadspin being FAR more influential on its overall niche. It changed sports journalism completely and, unlike Gawker which snarks ON the media conversation, Deadspin actually drives and crafts the conversation.

  • abesauer

    *Adweek*

  • http://www.sailrabbits.com Magister

    @abesauer: I’m still weighing my potential comment on the post as a whole, but as an avid Gawker consumer, I have to say that out of all the blogs I read, I’m pretty confident that I click on Gawker ads more than those from any other source.

    If I were in charge of Denton’s ad department (or if I was otherwise employed by his empire), I might do a couple of things differently, but I think one of the true measures of internet advertising is the click-through rate and based on my own behavior, I’d think the Gawker conglomerate is doing well.

  • corvin81

    Hello,hi i celebrate your special article, I would be glad if you would want me to blog a bloomy review on this wordpress site in my little Blog Site would you grant me permission to?

    Sincerely, John Peds
    Author of how to cook salmon

  • jennielynsan

    This is wonderful of the greatest blogs in the area of educational activity. If I don’t came in for a couple of days, there are so many stakes that it’ll lead me a couple of hr just to go all over whatever I missed!! Congratulations.

    Thanks. wonderful great info. here keep up Culinary Skills Egg Salad Recipe French Onion Soup Recipe the great work. I cannot genuinely provide a more constructive commentary as i’m abit out of my deph but i will be checking back here for further updates.

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Self-Serve Advertising | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram