1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough

Welcome To 20-10

» 5 comments

ny1-patonset-2007-cropped-21I’m trying really hard this week to say “Twenty Ten.”

When we do a story looking back at 2009, I typically say “Two Thousand Nine.” And when 2010 comes up in a script my first instinct is to continue the pattern and say “Two Thousand Ten.” But it’s time for a format change.

There is, of course, no governing body to make this decision for the world. And it’s not like “Two Thousand Ten” is horrible. But we’ve got to think ahead on this so we can get back into the pattern that leaves us with easy historical references like the “Summer of ’69.” The example set by the media in the next few days will be a critical one. Whether it’s Ryan Seacrest and Dick Clark on “Rockin’ New Year’s Eve” or Anderson Cooper on CNN, anybody who’s on the air this week will have to figure out how to react to the number 2010.

I’ve been watching my colleagues to try to get some affirmation of my choice. There is little consistency. Carson Daly was on the Today Show this morning saying “Two Thousand Ten.” We’ll see if he sticks with that when he hosts NBC’s countdown tonight. I listened to some of NBC Nightly News to see what direction Brian Wiliams was taking and didn’t find a reference to 2010, but I did hear him say “Twenty Twenty-Five.”

I checked with friends at CNN and there’s been no clear directive to the network’s anchors and reporters. But the promo announcer on the tease for the midnight coverage didn’t fall in line with me. He says “countdown to two thousand ten.”

I looked to the Brits for some affirmation. ITN’s reporter said “Twenty Ten” in a lookahead to London’s fireworks celebration. That definitely seems to be the pronunciation favored by my counterparts in Canada — likely driven by the fact that they’ve been talking about “Vancouver Twenty Ten” for years in their pre-Olympic coverage.

I crowd-sourced the question on Twitter and got dozens of responses and a clear consensus in favor of Twenty-Ten. Two followers led me to the TwentyNot2000.com website, which weighs in with this: “If we don’t fix this now, we’ll be stuck saying years the long way for the next 99 years. Don’t let that happen!”

Cleveland Plain-Dealer reporter Tony Brown wrote about the topic last week. An expert at the Oxford English Dictionary told him it’s obvious why we started the decade with “Two Thousand” instead of “Twenty Hundred.” From there, we were led to “Two Thousand and One” by the iconic science fiction movie. But with 2010 we are in a position to make a clean break.

So join me in the transition to “Twenty Ten.” As my interim reminder, I changed 2010 to “20-10″ in broadcast copy. I’m betting I’ll only need to do that for a few weeks, because a month from now “Twenty Ten” will be comfortably routine.

TV newsman Pat Kiernan picks his favorite stories from the morning papers each weekday on NY1 News and PatsPapers.com. He’s known to VH1 fans as the host of World Series of Pop Culture. Twitter: @patkiernan

Related:
The Aughts: A Decade of “Huh?” [Mediaite]

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • JoeSomebody

    “Twenty Ten” sounds great. So slick, modern and futuristic.

    My local news weather guy here in Austin has been saying “twenty ten”. Rachel Maddow has been saying “two thousand ten” on her show.

    But really, the issue has already been decided for us by the Vancouver Olympic Committee. Since they have settled on the “twenty ten” branding for the games, and since those games are broadcast all over the world and accompanied by a year-long advertising blitz that is completely unavoidable, by the end of 2010, very, very few people will still be sticking with “two thousand ten” after hearing “the twenty ten winter olympic games” so many thousands of times.

  • JunkJunk

    Or how about Y2K-10? Or Two Aught Ten?

    Yeah…

    I vote for Twenty Ten.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Sherman/1491106971 David Sherman

    OF COURSE it should be read as “twenty-ten!” We don’t refer to the year 1910 as “one thousand nine hundred and ten,” do we? And we don’t refer to 1776 as “one thousand seven hundred seventy six,” right? So why should 2010 be any different?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/James-Guo/100000649950349 James Guo
  • jennielynsan

    This is tremendous of the better blogs in the area of education. If I don’t came in for a couple of days, there are so many stakes that it’ll need me a couple of hours just to go over whatsoever I missed!! Praise.

    Thanks. wonderful wonderful infos. here keep up Culinary Skills Egg Salad Recipe French Onion Soup Recipe the versatile work. I cannot actually lead a more creative comment as i’m abit out of my deph but i will be checking back here for further updates.

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Self-Serve Advertising | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram