had a joke for the first line in the headline, but nnaaaaaaaa

“I don’t know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don’t care. It’s not that important. It’s not our priority.”
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

And all 10 of his viewers cared.

HTML5 Evangelist said:
“I don’t know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don’t care. It’s not that important. It’s not our priority.”
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2011/05/10/bush-twice-sent-special-ops-into-pakistan-to-hunt-top-terrorists/

Chris Matthews: ‘I’m Not A Bush Hater’

Oh shit, I think I gave myself a hernia by laughing too hard.

” I mean this is the rich kid…”

Says the rich kid who makes $5 million per year and lives in the bougie Cleveland Park section of DC.

Good job! Here’s a suggestion for a Republican debate…

Republican Debate of my dreams:

Give participants a video of their choosing and two minutes to respond.

Sarah Palin: Thanksgiving Message: http://www.facebook.com/notes/sarah-palin/a-thanksgiving-message-to-all-57-states/463364218434

Obama Video: Obama Gaffe video: http://www.blinkx.com/watch-video/obama-gaffe-hall-of-fame/nohkt-yI2H90jf94QE9umA

Please!!!!!!!!!

why would i listen to a left-wing hack like chris matthews

Wise ass ? King Barry mocks US citizens on a daily basis .

Just today in El Paso .

Obama ‘s Alinski tactics don’t work anymore since they’ve been exposed .

Matthews is just stating something that is a matter of fact. Bush wasn’t serious about bin Laden and wanted to invade Iraq – which had nothing to do with 9/11. Sad, but true. This is undeniable.

Whenever someone says “I’m not a” or “I don’t wanna be”… They are about to “be” exactly “that”.

In retrospect, Republican Senator John McCain looked particularly foolish saying it would be naive for then presidential candidate Barack Obama to say he would go into Pakistan to get Bin Laden.

No. It isn’t naive to do it, it’s naive to say you’re going to do it.

tatboy said:
Whenever someone says “I’m not a” or “I don’t wanna be”… They are about to “be” exactly “that”.

I’m not the smartest and best-looking person in the world but I agree with you.

The Lantern of Truth said:
Wise ass ? King Barry mocks US citizens on a daily basis .

Just today in El Paso .

Obama ’s Alinski tactics don’t work anymore since they’ve been exposed .

He never used them in the first place.

Exactly, tatboy. Been my experience that when someone says “I’m a people person”, the translation is “I’m one mean son of a bitch.”

tatboy said:
Whenever someone says “I’m not a” or “I don’t wanna be”… They are about to “be” exactly “that”.

Are you a liberal?

Nice to see Matthews has his usual diversity of views..

Sam M. said:
Matthews is just stating something that is a matter of fact. Bush wasn’t serious about bin Laden and wanted to invade Iraq – which had nothing to do with 9/11. Sad, but true. This is undeniable.

i think the question now is why did he lie about iraq. he could have did it for purely idealogical reasons to bring democracy to the region or he could have lied to make his presidency seem larger than he thought he was. my guess is the latter. (he also told the argentine pm that war is good for the economy…boy, was he wrong about that)

I’m not surprised Mediaite skipped this Tingles story:

Chris Matthews: Last Week Was ‘Best Week Ever For The Country’

Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/05/09/chris-matthews-last-week-was-best-week-ever-country#ixzz1Lzc7T6Mm

Complete lunatic! He fits right in with you libs.

Who is Chris Matthews? LoL

BeckFinallyDemoted said:
I’m not the smartest and best-looking person in the world but I agree with you.

OK… that was a good one. :)

tatboy said:
Whenever someone says “I’m not a” or “I don’t wanna be”… They are about to “be” exactly “that”.

the best one is “i don’t wanna be a hater…”

ChiliPeppersFan said:
i think the question now is why did he lie about iraq. he could have did it for purely idealogical reasons to bring democracy to the region or he could have lied to make his presidency seem larger than he thought he was. my guess is the latter. (he also told the argentine pm that war is good for the economy…boy, was he wrong about that)

If Obama wanted to bounce back the economy, then why are we in Libya?

Sam M. said:
Are you a liberal?

I’m an atheist libertarian objectivist.

WCinWI said:
If Obama wanted to bounce back the economy, then why are we in Libya?

Or rather, if he wanted the economy to bounce back…. :)

Sam M. said:
1 2
The Lantern of Truth said:
Wise ass ? King Barry mocks US citizens on a daily basis .
Just today in El Paso .
Obama ’s Alinski tactics don’t work anymore since they’ve been exposed .
He never used them in the first place.

That’s all he uses!

He taugh it at Harvard!

ChiliPeppersFan said:
he could have did it

wow…that’s sad.

ChiliPeppersFan said:
the best one is “i don’t wanna be a hater…”

I like… “I’m not trying to be a bitch or anything!” Classic…

tatboy said:
I’m an atheist libertarian objectivist.

Hmmm so what does an objectivist believe or not believe? I’ve never really heard the term before.

Jeez. This fat, slobbering turd ,Tingles, is not worth the obvious insult
tonight.
Keep him around COMCAST.
He is at least good for some laughs!

ChiliPeppersFan said:
i think the question now is why did he lie about iraq. he could have did it for purely idealogical reasons to bring democracy to the region or he could have lied to make his presidency seem larger than he thought he was. my guess is the latter. (he also told the argentine pm that war is good for the economy…boy, was he wrong about that)

I guess he lied about it for the same reason Clinton, Blair, the Dems in Congress, Nancy Pelosi, and 90% of the civilized world did, huh? You don’t have much of a memory. There was overwhelming support worldwide to invade Iraq, and every intelligence agency of ours and Britain & everywhere else concurred, Saddam had to go. I believe Hillary AND Bill liked that term John Kerry used about Iraq and “regime change”.

Yeah, one guy was the only one behind it all. Jesus you people are ridiculous.

timzank said:
I guess he lied about it for the same reason Clinton, Blair, the Dems in Congress, Nancy Pelosi, and 90% of the civilized world did, huh? You don’t have much of a memory. There was overwhelming support worldwide to invade Iraq, and every intelligence agency of ours and Britain & everywhere else concurred, Saddam had to go. I believe Hillary AND Bill liked that term John Kerry used about Iraq and “regime change”.

Yeah, one guy was the only one behind it all. Jesus you people are ridiculous.

Nonetheless it was a lie and Bush took his eye off the ball. And you tea-baggers will swallow anything you are fed. You in particular.

A-MESS-NBC – Your place for liberal lunacy.

MSNBC’s Bashir Asks Tancredo: ‘Would You Have Preferred Obama’s Death Over Bin Laden’s?’

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/05/10/msnbcs-bashir-asks-tancredo-would-you-have-preferred-obamas-death-ove#ixzz1LzeImiQD

jdubbellu said:
“The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait under Saddam Hussein on August 2, 1990 put the Saudi kingdom and the House of Saud at risk, with Iraqi forces on the Saudi border and Saddam’s appeal to pan-Arabism potentially inciting internal dissent. Bin Laden met with King Fahd, and Saudi Defense Minister Sultan, telling them not to depend on non-Muslim assistance from the United States and others, offering to help defend Saudi Arabia with his mujahideen. Bin Laden’s offer was rebuffed, and after the Saudi monarchy invited the deployment of U.S. troops in Saudi territory,[68] Bin Laden publicly denounced Saudi Arabia’s dependence on the U.S. military. Bin Laden believed the presence of foreign troops in the “land of the two mosques” (Mecca and Medina) profaned sacred soil. Bin Laden’s criticism of the Saudi monarchy led that government to attempt to silence him.

Shortly after Saudi Arabia invited U.S. troops into Saudi Arabia, bin Laden turned his attention to attacks on the West. On November 8, 1990, the FBI raided the New Jersey home of El Sayyid Nosair, an associate of al-Qaeda operative Ali Mohamed, discovering copious evidence of terrorist plots, including plans to blow up New York City skyscrapers. This marked the earliest discovery of al-Qaeda terrorist plans outside of Muslim countries.[69] Nosair was eventually convicted in connection to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and later admitted guilt for the murder of Rabbi Meir Kahane in New York on November 5, 1990.

Bin Laden continued to speak publicly against the Saudi government for harboring American troops, for which the Saudis banished him. He went to live in exile in Sudan, in 1992, in a deal brokered by Ali Mohamed.[70]”

US troops were NEVER going to leave saudi arabia as long as saddam was in power. osama would continue to use that as motivation for al qaeda. you are either ignorant or an idiot. probably both…

And this is a cut and paste job from what publication?

WCinWI said:
Hmmm so what does an objectivist believe or not believe? I’ve never really heard the term before.

Watch a couple of episodes of BULL*HIT w/ Penn & Teller. They do a better job explaining than I do.

Got that one right. W always had the air of a petulant child who never gets picked by the recess teams. Perhaps, that is why he became a cheerleader.

tatboy said:
I’m an atheist libertarian objectivist.

So in other words you are say you are not a liberal and therefore you are. Check please.

Sam M. said:
So in other words you are say you are not a liberal and therefore you are. Check please.

I say what I am… no more, no less.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Got that one right. W always had the air of a petulant child who never gets picked by the recess teams. Perhaps, that is why he became a cheerleader.

Have you seen where those guys get to put their hands??? HELL… I wanted to be a cheerleader… :).

HTML5 Evangelist said:
“I don’t know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don’t care. It’s not that important. It’s not our priority.”
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

Video: Bush says he’ll send troops into Pakistan if Osama’s spotted – 9/20/06

Interesting how Blitzer interrupts Bush, and he asks that Blitzer let him finish his answer…and CNN cuts the clip and goes to another.

“My preference obviously would be to capture or kill him,” he said. “But if we have so tightened the noose that he’s in a cave somewhere and can’t even communicate with his operatives then we will meet our goal of protecting America.” – Barack Obama, 1/14/09

And, last but not least, your favoritest Bush quote seems to be fake. Do you have a credible source for it?

It’s listed at dkosopedia with a dead link to the official White House transcript for Bush’s March 13, 2002 presser, which…wait for it…doesn’t contain the quote.

When and where did he utter that quote, Mr. HTML5?

I’m not a Bush hater, nor a hater of anyone. I am, however, along with a lot of people including Chris Matthews not especially appreciative of the crummy job he did while trying to be a grown-up President. Even a lot of Conservative rightwing type of people know this to be the truth. You might say that Bush had a poor understanding of the way the world works and the mess he created in the Mideast is the prime example of his incompetance followed closely by the unprecedented, greed driven blow-up of our economy. Also, you have to admit, the negativity directed at Obama is the epitomy of stupidity and overkill. He’s not Jesus walking on water but he is a ‘slight’ improvement over his predecessor. The Democrats aren’t much better as we all know, but there’s no way this country is going to let the current rightwing loonies run the show. Why on earth would the majority, and, in an honest count we are definitely the majority – we have all the demographics on our side – why would we want our own demise? And, yes, get over the very real fact that Obama, as President, was responsible for the delivering what is probably a mortal blow to Al Queda.

tatboy said:
I say what I am… no more, no less.

A liberal.

Let me be clear: Matthews is nothing but an A$$hole. The seeds of Bin Laden’s demise were put in place by the Bush administration. ANY reading of history that suggests otherwise is patently false. Matthews of all people should be able to tell the difference between what is said by presidents for “public consumption” and what’s actually going on behind the scenes. The fact that he intentionally ignores this shows what a pathetic A$$hole he really is.

For all the Fox haters out there, take one look at MSNBC’s prime time lineup and tell me how this lineup isn’t an order of magnitude more partisan than anything Fox has on air. You can’t. The entire prime time lineup at MSNBC is based on “What stories can we contrive to make the right look bad and the left look good”. Then, contrast that with Shep Smith, Bret Baier, O’Reilly, and Van Susteren. Yeah, O’Reilly. He’s much, much more likely to be supportive of something Obama’s done than anyone on MSNBC would be toward a Republican.

I’ll give you Beck and Hannity. But MSNBC has just as partisan people on-air during those time slots. The rest? MSNBC is far, far, FAR more partisan during prime time than Fox.

Here’s the text of that exchange which also, oddly enough, does not contain that quote:

Q Mr. President, in your speeches now you rarely talk or mention Osama bin Laden. Why is that? Also, can you tell the American people if you have any more information, if you know if he is dead or alive? Final part — deep in your heart, don’t you truly believe that until you find out if he is dead or alive, you won’t really eliminate the threat of –

THE PRESIDENT: Deep in my heart I know the man is on the run, if he’s alive at all. Who knows if he’s hiding in some cave or not; we haven’t heard from him in a long time. And the idea of focusing on one person is — really indicates to me people don’t understand the scope of the mission.

Terror is bigger than one person. And he’s just — he’s a person who’s now been marginalized. His network, his host government has been destroyed. He’s the ultimate parasite who found weakness, exploited it, and met his match. He is — as I mentioned in my speech, I do mention the fact that this is a fellow who is willing to commit youngsters to their death and he, himself, tries to hide — if, in fact, he’s hiding at all.

So I don’t know where he is. You know, I just don’t spend that much time on him, Kelly, to be honest with you. I’m more worried about making sure that our soldiers are well-supplied; that the strategy is clear; that the coalition is strong; that when we find enemy bunched up like we did in Shahikot Mountains, that the military has all the support it needs to go in and do the job, which they did.

And there will be other battles in Afghanistan. There’s going to be other struggles like Shahikot, and I’m just as confident about the outcome of those future battles as I was about Shahikot, where our soldiers are performing brilliantly. We’re tough, we’re strong, they’re well-equipped. We have a good strategy. We are showing the world we know how to fight a guerrilla war with conventional means.

Q But don’t you believe that the threat that bin Laden posed won’t truly be eliminated until he is found either dead or alive?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, as I say, we haven’t heard much from him. And I wouldn’t necessarily say he’s at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don’t know where he is. I — I’ll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him. I know he is on the run. I was concerned about him, when he had taken over a country. I was concerned about the fact that he was basically running Afghanistan and calling the shots for the Taliban.

But once we set out the policy and started executing the plan, he became — we shoved him out more and more on the margins. He has no place to train his al Qaeda killers anymore. And if we — excuse me for a minute — and if we find a training camp, we’ll take care of it. Either we will or our friends will. That’s one of the things — part of the new phase that’s becoming apparent to the American people is that we’re working closely with other governments to deny sanctuary, or training, or a place to hide, or a place to raise money.

And we’ve got more work to do. See, that’s the thing the American people have got to understand, that we’ve only been at this six months. This is going to be a long struggle. I keep saying that; I don’t know whether you all believe me or not. But time will show you that it’s going to take a long time to achieve this objective. And I can assure you, I am not going to blink. And I’m not going to get tired. Because I know what is at stake. And history has called us to action, and I am going to seize this moment for the good of the world, for peace in the world and for freedom.

Great catch, Pablo, but you don’t really believe they care, right? Right now, they are rocking back and forth with their hands over their ears saying, “I can’t hear you”.

Sam M. said:
A liberal.

No one who knows me would describe me that way.

DaTruth said:
Let me be clear: Matthews is nothing but an A$$hole. The seeds of Bin Laden’s demise were put in place by the Bush administration. ANY reading of history that suggests otherwise is patently false. Matthews of all people should be able to tell the difference between what is said by presidents for “public consumption” and what’s actually going on behind the scenes. The fact that he intentionally ignores this shows what a pathetic A$$hole he really is.

For all the Fox haters out there, take one look at MSNBC’s prime time lineup and tell me how this lineup isn’t an order of magnitude more partisan than anything Fox has on air. You can’t. The entire prime time lineup at MSNBC is based on “What stories can we contrive to make the right look bad and the left look good”. Then, contrast that with Shep Smith, Bret Baier, O’Reilly, and Van Susteren. Yeah, O’Reilly. He’s much, much more likely to be supportive of something Obama’s done than anyone on MSNBC would be toward a Republican.

I’ll give you Beck and Hannity. But MSNBC has just as partisan people on-air during those time slots. The rest? MSNBC is far, far, FAR more partisan during prime time than Fox.

You’re high on meth. This is total bs.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Great catch, Pablo, but you don’t really believe they care, right? Right now, they are rocking back and forth with their hands over their ears saying, “I can’t hear you”.

Well, we’ll just have to keep smacking them in the head with it, won’t we? For the readers, naturally.

tatboy said:
Have you seen where those guys get to put their hands??? HELL… I wanted to be a cheerleader… :).

It was an all male school. Besides, it’s a tassel loafer kind of thing.

tatboy said:
No one who knows me would describe me that way.

You described yourself that way.

Cable TV’s Village Idiot, Chrissy Matthews, is at it again. Anything to try to raise his pitiful ratings (next to last @ PMSnbc) but, as usual it always fails. When you have daily as your guests the likes of David Corn, Joan Walsh, Eugene Robinson, and their ilk, there just isn’t any credibility for the viewer to grab hold of. Chrissy ‘Tingles & Thrills’ Matthews Softball show is worthless. Nobody ever gets to answer Chrissy’s stupid questions. However, Chrissy does give his 6 or 7 viewers a mouthful of spittle. Chrissy really needs to get that under control. I’d sure hate to be the guest across the table from old Chrissy.

jdubbellu said:
come on chicken shit, do you dispute it? afraid it might be a “gotcha”? stand up and quit being a pussy…

Sure, it’s just a high school cut and paste job that you most likely haven’t read and don’t understand, Nothing here as usual. Anything else?

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Itassel loafer kind of thing.

Tassel loafers… sooooo 80′s.

What a G damn liar this guy is. He hates Bush so much he hasn’t banged his wife in 10 years.

Mediaite, please stop assaulting my computer screen with those stupid MSNBC vignettes! You just throw them up there without even giving me an option.

Pablo said:
Well, we’ll just have to keep smacking them in the head with it, won’t we? For the readers, naturally.

Keep Smacking, Slapping and Jacking!

Obama Got OBL!

Barack Must Go said:
What a G damn liar this guy is. He hates Bush so much he hasn’t banged his wife in 10 years.

Maybe you can let him borrow your stuffed duck.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Got that one right. W always had the air of a petulant child who never gets picked by the recess teams. Perhaps, that is why he became a cheerleader.

Back in the early forties , Robert was critical of the females doing the jitterbug at the canteen in Austin . He vowed then and there he would imprint his style on their makeup and especially their hairdos and one day have his own salon . Today he has realized that dream with a special friend of his , BFD , who , while uncouth and creepy , does giggle at Robert’s nicknames for the Palin children and his catty remarks when each customer leaves . Meow .

Sam M. said:
You described yourself that way.

Tatboy is a liberatrian or a classic/true liberal.
Nothing like the “liberals” of today who want powerful and therefore most likely oppressive government.
we want small government with maximum individual and economic freedom.
Modern “liberalism” is down right authoritarian when compared to classic liberalism.

illusive man said:
Chris Matthews: ‘I’m Not A Bush Hater’

Oh shit, I think I gave myself a hernia by laughing too hard.

And the idiot actually thinks that people believe him!

jdubbellu said:
this is how you take down libpussies folks. without a source that they can go after and hide the fact they dont know how to read or debate, they fail for all the world to see. dude you should just go kill yourself.

You take down right wing pussies, like you of course, a giant cavernous pussy by stating the facts and then big smelly pussies like you have no answer because you sit on your brain all day.

By the way, you cut and paste because it doesn’t require you to think. Pussy. I think I just smacked you down which must be a horrible embarrassment.

Liberal Tormentor said:
A-MESS-NBC – Your place for liberal lunacy.

MSNBC’s Bashir Asks Tancredo: ‘Would You Have Preferred Obama’s Death Over Bin Laden’s?’

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/05/10/msnbcs-bashir-asks-tancredo-would-you-have-preferred-obamas-death-ove#ixzz1LzeImiQD

Tancredo had said, “Obama is more dangerous to the US than bin Laden.”
Bashir was asking if he really meant that.

illusive man said:
Tatboy is a liberatrian or a classic/true liberal.
Nothing like the “liberals” of today who want powerful and therefore most likely oppressive government.
we want small government with maximum individual and economic freedom.
Modern “liberalism” is down right authoritarian when compared to classic liberalism.

No you don’t. You want fascism.

jdubbellu said:
something ……………………………smells…………………………like…..

chicken shit

oh its just sam…

Then take your head out of your crotch you big pussy.

grafxmail7 said:
Keep Smacking, Slapping and Jacking!

Obama Got OBL!

Obama got nuthin is more like it. Unless he shoots a fellow muslim in the back of the head once a month for the next eighteen months it’s the curb for him. So spank away, but it’s over for B.

tatboy said:
THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Itassel loafer kind of thing.
Tassel loafers… sooooo 80’s.

Unfortunately his brain is stuck in the 60′s.

jdubbellu said:
try again twatwaffle. dispute the points i made or go kill yourself, loser.

The only point you have is the one on top of your head you big chicken shit pussy.

Sam M. said:
No you don’t. You want fascism.

No, that would be modern “liberals” who would use government to force their policies onto the rest of us.

How does wanting small government with maximum individual and economic freedom = fascism exactly?

And why do I have a feeling your answer will not make sence.

illusive man said:
No, that would be modern “liberals” who would use government to force their policies onto the rest of us.

How does wanting small government with maximum individual and economic freedom = fascism exactly?

And why do I have a feeling your answer will not make sence.

No that’s the modern tea-baggers. Obviously a graduate of Beck University. Something to tell your grandchildren.

jdubbellu said:
does mommy know you are on the computer?

Does your dog know you are a chicken shit with a large pussy? Dog’s preference night. Uh-oh.

George Bush gets credit for $3 T spent invading Iraq, the wrong Country in 2003.

Sam M. said:
jdubbellu

Sam M. said:
Sam M.

Both of you are f%$$% idiots….. lol.

jdubbellu said:
wtf, loser are you 12? no you big poo poo head!!

when you bring the fail, you really bring it…

I don’t bring anywhere near what the dog is going to bring. I’d suggest you bring treats.

HTML5 Evangelist said:
Both of you are f%$$% idiots….. lol.

Well, I can see that you are clearly a brainiac. LOL.

jdubbellu said:
u mad? must make you crazy you cant dispute anything. your melt down has been entertaining…

You’re just upset because I made you look like an idiot. Which in all honesty was not that difficult. You did most of the work. You’re a buffoon and a laugh a minute.

Sam M. said:
Well, I can see that you are clearly a brainiac. LOL.

Your idiocy is rubbing off on me.Next thing you know I’ll be saying “chicken shit dog doo-doo pussy!” LOL

Sam M. said:
Well, I can see that you are clearly a brainiac. LOL.

Glad to see ya back Garth.

HTML5 Evangelist said:
Your idiocy is rubbing off on me.Next thing you know I’ll be saying “chicken shit dog doo-doo pussy!” LOL

Actually, you do say that.

timzank said:
Glad to see ya back Garth.

Always fun to stir things up with you whack-a-loons.

I wondered if that was Garth, Tim, but he hadn’t used the words anal cyst, so I wasn’t sure. Same stupidity though,

HTML5 Evangelist said:
George Bush gets credit for $3 T spent invading Iraq, the wrong Country in 2003.

Hey, are you going to tell us where that fake Bush quote you were selling came from?

Oh, and we still haven’t spent $1 Trillion on Iraq, let alone $3 Trillion. Also, that’s where we found Saddam Hussein, which is what we went in there after. Mr. HTML5. you lie.

timzank said:
Glad to see ya back Garth.

Yup .

Liberal Tormentor said:
I wondered if that was Garth, Tim, but he hadn’t used the words anal cyst, so I wasn’t sure. Same stupidity though,

Maybe you tools should form a committee and come up with something really dumb.

jdubbellu said:
so you are mad and delusional…keep going! maybe youll have an aneurism, and wont have to kill yourself…

Would you feel better if I apologized for making you look like an idiot?

The Lantern of Truth said:
Yup .

Thanks!

Sam M. said:
Maybe you tools should form a committee and come up with something really dumb.

Who needs a committee to come up with something really dumb? You’re here.

Sam M. said:
Maybe you tools should form a committee and come up with something really dumb.

I don’t think Eliane B. can be topped. Those were your glory days.

No, Chris Matthews hates George W. Bush, he always has and always has had made it public.

Pablo said:
Oh, and we still haven’t spent $1 Trillion on Iraq, let alone $3 Trillion

Thanks for pointing that out Pablo. I read a CBO report from last year that put the cost of the Iraq war at around $740 billion. I think when HTML referenced $3 trillion, he was confusing Obama’s budget deficits with the cost of the Iraq war.

Zandandido said:
No, Chris Matthews hates George W. Bush, he always has and always has had made it public.

Matthews was Bush’s lapdog until the WMD turned up vapor in 2003. You don’y know sh*t about what you’re talking about, and neither did wise-ass Bush. He invaded the wrong f*ckin country and blew off the the guy he claimed he was after.

please get this guy off the airwaves….

Glackin, don’t be a victim. The Royal Dimwit hates that.

Pablo said:
Here’s the text of that exchange

Thanks for posting that. George Bush knew what he was doing.

Glackin said:
THOUGHT YOU SHOULD KNOW I JUST FILED A COMPLAINT ABOUT YOU POSTING MY PERSONAL INFORMATION.
I would do the same for you if I didn’t have scruples, or if Google had cameras in the sewers.

Unless I’m mistaken–and I don’t believe I am–haven’t you made “trailer park” comments on here before in an effort to belittle your ideological opponents? And yet you live in an effing shack. BTW, how could you be so stupid as to reveal enough information about yourself to allow anyone to find out where you live? Smarten up.

Pablo said:
I don’t think Eliane B. can be topped. Those were your glory days.

Who is a Elaine B? Your wife?

Sean68 said:
Unless I’m mistaken–and I don’t believe I am–haven’t you made “trailer park” comments on here before in an effort to belittle your ideological opponents? And yet you live in an effing shack. BTW, how could you be so stupid as to reveal enough information about yourself to allow anyone to find out where you live? Smarten up.

he used facebook to log in, not to smart

Rio said:
Who needs a committee to come up with something really dumb? You’re here.

Can always count on you to make my point. Don’t even have to try with you baggers.

Azarkhan said:
Thanks for pointing that out Pablo. I read a CBO report from last year that put the cost of the Iraq war at around $740 billion. I think when HTML referenced $3 trillion, he was confusing Obama’s budget deficits with the cost of the Iraq war.

Bush deficits. Republicans get us into messes, Democrats clean it up as they always have.

Sam M. said:
Bush deficits. Republicans get us into messes, Democrats clean it up as they always have.

yeah, i remember korea and vietnam, oops never mind

for those confused about the costs of the iraq war (alone):

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/03/AR2010090302200.html

cjd ohio 1 said:
yeah, i remember korea and vietnam, oops never mind

I remember Nixon (Vietnam) Raygun (high deficits which didn’t matter at the time), Bush 1 and 2 (deficits on top of deficits and near economic meltdown).

Oops. Never mind. Democrats clean up the messes Republicans make. Always have, always will.

nixon, vietnam lol are you for real?

darladoon said:
for those confused about the costs of the iraq war (alone): http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/03/AR2010090302200.html

two liberal writers(both work for democrats) add all kinds of phony costs lol

cjd ohio 1 said:
nixon, vietnam lol are you for real?

Were you in a coma?

Sam M. said:
Were you in a coma?

LBJ , dummy

darladoon said:
for those confused about the costs of the iraq war (alone):

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/03/AR2010090302200.html

That’s GWB;s mess, a big R.

cjd ohio 1 said:
LBJ , dummy

Yes numb nuts, LBJ escalated, Nixon promised to get us out but instead escalated the war and committed criminal acts, a Republican. It was Gerald Ford, GERALD FORD who finally said let’s get the hell out. Republicans handled that just beautifully.

Pablo said:
Oh, and we still haven’t spent $1 Trillion on Iraq, let alone $3 Trillion. Also, that’s where we found Saddam Hussein, which is what we went in there after. Mr. HTML5. you lie.

YOU lie.HTML5 is usually a smart guy.He should put down the bottle and stop spending so much time debugging open-source video software.*wink*wink*HTML5*wink*wink*. W/Cheney, Gonzo, Yoo, PNAC et al, tortured against Geneva & UCMJ while spending $4.3 T! (CBO) in Iraq’s faux peak-oil wars, because OBL was 120 miles away from his last known December 2001 location at Tora Bora, Afghanistan.That’s “Wrong country invaded by W, Iraq”, unless your a faux peak oil war beneficiary like Dick’s then nearly bankrupt Halliburton, W’s #1 Donor Enron, RNC #1 Donor Eric Prince’s BlackWater/Xe.Talk about incompetence……..

Sam M. said:
Yes numb nuts, LBJ escalated, Nixon promised to get us out but instead escalated the war and committed criminal acts, a Republican. It was Gerald Ford, GERALD FORD who finally said let’s get the hell out. Republicans handled that just beautifully.

highest troop level 1968, 536,000………..declined every year after…..but i know facts are yor enemy sam lol, and causualties declined each year, but go on sam

Darwisll said:
YOU lie.HTML5 is usually a smart guy.He should put down the bottle and stop spending so much time debugging open-source video software.*wink*wink*HTML5*wink*wink*. W/Cheney, Gonzo, Yoo, PNAC et al, tortured against Geneva & UCMJ while spending $4.3 T! (CBO) in Iraq’s faux peak-oil wars, because OBL was 120 miles away from his last known December 2001 location at Tora Bora, Afghanistan.That’s “Wrong country invaded by W, Iraq”, unless your a faux peak oil war beneficiary like Dick’s then nearly bankrupt Halliburton, W’s #1 Donor Enron, RNC #1 Donor Eric Prince’s BlackWater/Xe.Talk about incompetence……..

Wow. That was a logical, intelligent explanation of…something. Don’t call us – we’ll call you.

Sam M. said:
Who is a Elaine B? Your wife?

Not Elaine B, brainstem, Eliane B. You remember, right Ted?

OK, you probably don’t, what with the brain damage and all. But I had a great laugh.

cjd ohio 1 said:
highest troop level 1968, 536,000………..declined every year after…..but i know facts are yor enemy sam lol, and causualties declined each year, but go on sam

Pure bs. Facts can be your friend but not in your case. Nixon escalated the war in every way but there are always some who refuse to see facts. You are one of those. Does Cambodia mean anything to you? No? Go figure and go educate yourself.

Pablo said:
Not Elaine B, brainstem, Eliane B. You remember, right Ted?

OK, you probably don’t, what with the brain damage and all. But I had a great laugh.

Oh sure, that slut you used to date. Very nice!!

Sam M. said:
Pure bs. Facts can be your friend but not in your case. Nixon escalated the war in every way but there are always some who refuse to see facts. You are one of those. Does Cambodia mean anything to you? No? Go figure and go educate yourself.

lol, read history, look it up, i dont care…………

Let’s stop feeding the troll. He’s getting morbidly obese.

cjd ohio 1 said:
lol, read history, look it up, i dont care…………

Apparently you don’t care enough to get your facts straight.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Let’s stop feeding the troll. He’s getting morbidly obese.

And you need three seat in coach?

Azarkhan said:
Wow. That was a logical, intelligent explanation of…something. Don’t call us – we’ll call you.

I’ll put it in simpler terms for you to understand.Bush.Iraq invade.Osama bin Laden.Tora Bora.Failed.Incompetent. $4.3 T! (CBO).Obama.Pakistan.Osama bin Laden.Dead.Success.Competent.Beep,beep,beep! lolololol

Sam M. said:
Apparently you don’t care enough to get your facts straight.

i got my facts straight, you are just too stupid, you are the child left behind

Darwisll said:
I’ll put it in simpler terms for you to understand.Bush.Iraq invade.Osama bin Laden.Tora Bora.Failed.Incompetent. $4.3 T! (CBO).Obama.Pakistan.Osama bin Laden.Dead.Success.Competent.Beep,beep,beep! lolololol

This is far too factual and simple. He won’t get it.

cjd ohio 1 said:
i got my facts straight, you are just too stupid, you are the child left behind

You got your facts exactly wrong because like all you right wingers are either too intellectually lazy or too stupid to understand what you are reading (or not reading), That’s you, obviously.

Sam M. said:
Apparently you don’t care enough to get your facts straight.

troop levels by year 1968…536100, 1969….475200, 1970…..334600, 1971…..156800, 1972………24200, 1973….50, but dont let the facts get in the way sam, lol

Darwisll said:
I’ll put it in simpler terms for you to understand.Bush.Iraq invade.Osama bin Laden.Tora Bora.Failed.Incompetent. $4.3 T! (CBO).Obama.Pakistan.Osama bin Laden.Dead.Success.Competent.Beep,beep,beep! lolololol

I.e., you jerk off to a picture of Obama. Got it!

Sam M. said:
This is far too factual and simple. He won’t get it.

They get it.We had a clumsy “president” of limited intelligence, full of bravado and bluster, who eventually slunk away in disgrace, universally considered a failure and one of the worst presidents ever to hold the office.His name was George W. Bush/$4.3 T! (CBO)/That’s “Wrong country invaded by W, Iraq”.Talk about incompetence………

Sam M. said:
You got your facts exactly wrong because like all you right wingers are either too intellectually lazy or too stupid to understand what you are reading (or not reading), That’s you, obviously.

cjd ohio 1 said:
troop levels by year 1968…536100, 1969….475200, 1970…..334600, 1971…..156800, 1972………24200, 1973….50, but dont let the facts get in the way sam, lol

really, where?

cjd ohio 1 said:
troop levels by year 1968…536100, 1969….475200, 1970…..334600, 1971…..156800, 1972………24200, 1973….50, but dont let the facts get in the way sam, lol

Cambodia numb nuts. Ever hear of it? Nixon escalating the bombing in the north. Jesus, I learned this in high school. Get a book and read it. It was not Nixon, the crook, who got us out of Vietnam. it was GERALD FORD. Nixon, the Republican promised to get us out of VN – never did, but was one hell of a criminal.

Conservatives forget reality.Presidential scholars: W is the worst president of the modern era, bottom five of all time.

Since 1982, the Siena Research Institute has polled presidential scholars on whom they view to be best and worst presidents in American history, based on a variety of issues from “integrity” to economic stewardship.

This year’s poll of 238 scholars found that President Franklin Roosevelt was once again ranked on top, joined by Presidents Lincoln, Jefferson, Washington, and Teddy Roosevelt to complete the top five.

However, President George W. Bush did not fare well since the last poll was conducted in 2002.

He dropped 16 places to 39th, making him the worst president since Warren Harding died in office in 1923, and one of the bottom five of all time, according to the experts.”Mr. Tingles” is right on the money! lolololol

cjd ohio 1 said:
really, where?

I see the mistake you are making. You think because there were fewer US casualties that somehow this means that Nixon was winding things down. That’s your mistake and an easy one to point out. Nixon was pressing the war, end of story.

Let me put it in simpler terms for our Conservative friends; WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!

baby bush lost his pacifier! lololololol

Sam M. said:
Cambodia numb nuts. Ever hear of it?

Kerry did.

Off topic: That “Power Grid” is the most irrelevant sh*t I’ve seen in a long time. That sh*t could be random and zero people would know the difference.

Rio said:
Kerry did.

Thank you for that informative update. No one will ever accuse you of making irrelevant comments.

Rio said:
Kerry did.

Kerry was on the Mekong. W was on Padre Island.

lower troop levels, lower causualties, more bombing……………paris Jan 1973 end of ground troops, Aug 1973 end of bombing

Sam M. said:
I see the mistake you are making. You think because there were fewer US casualties that somehow this means that Nixon was winding things down. That’s your mistake and an easy one to point out. Nixon was pressing the war, end of story.

Glackin said:
Kerry was on the Mekong. W was on Padre Island.

Snorting coke and figuring out ways to squander a surplus and tank our economy.

cjd ohio 1 said:
lower troop levels, lower causualties, more bombing……………paris Jan 1973 end of ground troops, Aug 1973 end of bombing

So, are you suggesting that Nixon was actually winding things down in VN?

Sam M. said:
I see the mistake you are making. You think because there were fewer US casualties that somehow this means that Nixon was winding things down. That’s your mistake and an easy one to point out. Nixon was pressing the war, end of story.

nixon served till aug 9, 1974…….ford abandoned south vietman allies in april 1975

cjd ohio 1 said:
nixon served till aug 9, 1974…….ford abandoned south vietman allies in april 1975

And…

Sam M. said:
So, are you suggesting that Nixon was actually winding things down in VN?

i am stating facts, you believe what you want

Darwisll said:
Conservatives forget reality.Presidential scholars: W is the worst president of the modern era, bottom five of all time.

You wouldn’t know reality if it walked up to you and introduced itself. There are a lot of academic Presidential ranking polls out there. Siena is waaaay leftist. It’s actually amazing that they choked back enough bile to refrain from making Bush the eleventy millionth worst President as well as Satan’s little brother.

Sam M. said:
Cambodia numb nuts. Ever hear of it? Nixon escalating the bombing in the north. Jesus, I learned this in high school. Get a book and read it. It was not Nixon, the crook, who got us out of Vietnam. it was GERALD FORD. Nixon, the Republican promised to get us out of VN – never did, but was one hell of a criminal.

cjd ohio 1 said:
lower troop levels, lower causualties, more bombing……………paris Jan 1973 end of ground troops, Aug 1973 end of bombing

cjd ohio 1 said:
nixon served till aug 9, 1974…….ford abandoned south vietman allies in april 1975

the dates are clear

cjd ohio 1 said:
i am stating facts, you believe what you want

You are not stating facts. You are suggesting that Nixon was actually getting us out of VN when in fact he ramped it up a notch.

Sam M. said:
You are not stating facts. You are suggesting that Nixon was actually getting us out of VN when in fact he ramped it up a notch.

bullshit, those numbers and dates are facts……..just because you dont like it, i dont care

jdubbelIu said:
thread hijacked

i did it jdubbellu, sorry

cjd ohio 1 said:
bullshit, those numbers and dates are facts……..just because you dont like it, i dont care

The dates are completely irrelevant to your “argument.” The fact is that Nixon escalated the war in in VN. That’s a fact. You seem to be suggesting that he was winding things down. That is inaccurate as a matter of fact.

cjd ohio 1 said:
i did it jdubbellu, sorry

Hay seed comments.

Sam M. said:
The dates are completely irrelevant to your “argument.” The fact is that Nixon escalated the war in in VN. That’s a fact. You seem to be suggesting that he was winding things down. That is inaccurate as a matter of fact.

nope, escalate no, expand i will give you, but with less troops and less causualties

That’s just one of many Pablo.The majority of the polls that I’ve studied always show Dubya in the top #5 or #15 of worst presidents ever.Amazingly, on that list form historians, even Nixon and Hoover scored higher. Nixon had foreign policy successes to help his score, I guess, but Hoover?

The only Presidents to score lower were Franklin Pierce and James Buchanan, who were incompetent in the lead-up to the Civil War; Andrew Johnson, who put roadblocks in front of Reconstruction; and Harding, who was probably the most corrupt crook ever to set foot in the Oval Office.

Dubya was a all-around failure in foreign policy, domestic policy, and economic policy.All hat,no cattle……

cjd ohio 1 said:
nope, escalate no, expand i will give you, but with less troops and less causualties

When you increase the number of sorties in the north and commit to a secret (actually not so secret) war in Cambodia, that is escalation. He was trying to wear the North down and he failed. I don’t think there is much difference between expand and escalate. If you do, well, God bless ya man.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/chilling-footage-syrian-forces-arrest-hundreds-of-activists-in-house-to-house-raids/

Sam M. said:
When you increase the number of sorties in the north and commit to a secret (actually not so secret) war in Cambodia, that is escalation. He was trying to wear the North down and he failed. I don’t think there is much difference between expand and escalate. If you do, well, God bless ya man.

and the mess was started by a …………., its ok, say it, a democrat

Sam M. said:
When you increase the number of sorties in the north and commit to a secret (actually not so secret) war in Cambodia, that is escalation. He was trying to wear the North down and he failed. I don’t think there is much difference between expand and escalate. If you do, well, God bless ya man.

and by you logic, obama escalated and expanded the war in afghanistan, correct

cjd ohio 1 said:
and the mess was started by a …………., its ok, say it, a democrat

The mess was started by………John Foster Dulles and Dwight David Eisenhower.(R)
With a whole lot of encouragement by Francis, Cardinal Spellman.

Glackin said:
The mess was started by………John Foster Dulles and Dwight David Eisenhower.(R)With a whole lot of encouragement by Francis, Cardinal Spellman.

really when did combat troops arrive in vietnam?

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/osama-bin-laden-raid-pakistan-hints-china-peak/story?id=13570573

Those clips of Bush just show how poorly he was prepared. Bush’s military adventures were an unmitigated disaster. Now Obama has UBL’s head on a pole. It reminds of what Reagan said when Jesse Jackson flew to Libya and got those pilots released. Someone in the press asked if he thought the Libyans were trying to sway American politics. Ronnie said “You can’t knock results.” That is the bottom line. I generally don’t like Obama, but I like the fact that he had UBL shot and dumped in the ocean. He was certainly my president on that one. Let Bush keep trying to get that chainsaw started.

jdubbelIu said:
your house is the size of my garage lol talk about trailer trash…

You never saw a two story , 3br, 2bth trailer on a 1/4 acre lot before?

My money is on “Mr .Tingles” doctor! I bid you all a very good night……

Sam M. said:
No one will ever accuse you of making irrelevant comments.

Good, now if you would just follow suit.

cjd ohio 1 said:
really when did combat troops arrive in vietnam?

Dip, Dulles and Ike refused to allow the 1956 vote on unification to take place. Ngo Dinh Diem was their puppet, a good Catholic boy supported by Spellman. Advisors went into the South in 1954, when the French left after Dien Bien Phu. There were “advisors” there from the beginning. The “combat” vs. “advisor” status was a joke from the beginning. It was like calling Korea a “police action”.

Glackin said:
Dip, Dulles and Ike refused to allow the 1956 vote on unification to take place. Ngo Dinh Diem was their puppet, a good Catholic boy supported by Spellman. Advisors went into the South in 1954, when the French left after Dien Bien Phu. There were “advisors” there from the beginning. The “combat” vs. “advisor” status was a joke from the beginning. It was like calling Korea a “police action”.

korea, damn another democrat

HTML5 Evangelist said:
“I don’t know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don’t care. It’s not that important. It’s not our priority.”
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

” I think that we have to so weaken his infrastructure that, whether he is technically alive or not, he is so pinned down that he cannot function. My preference obviously would be to capture or kill him. But if we have so tightened the noose that he’s in a cave somewhere and can’t even communicate with his operatives, then we will meet our goal of protecting America.”

Barack Obama 1 / 14 09

That thrill up his legs is obviously active again. Chris is having another O-gasm. Pitiful.

George C said:
” I think that we have to so weaken his infrastructure that, whether he is technically alive or not, he is so pinned down that he cannot function. My preference obviously would be to capture or kill him. But if we have so tightened the noose that he’s in a cave somewhere and can’t even communicate with his operatives, then we will meet our goal of protecting America.”

Barack Obama 1 / 14 09

He sounds just like George Bush. I can’t believe I didn’t vote for this guy!

cjd ohio 1 said:
korea, damn another democrat

Lebanon, 1958?
Lebanon, 1983?

cjd ohio 1 said:
korea, damn another democrat

BTW, you non sequiter is showing. When you got nothing, you’re a right-wingnut.

Glackin said:
Lebanon, 1958?Lebanon, 1983?

lol, same changed the subject and after the facts ran away, now you are trying to change it again, lol

Sam M. said:
. Republicans get us into messes, Democrats clean it up as they always have.

hey talk to sam, he is the one that did it lol

I thought Matthews nailed it. Bush is the biggest, spoiled rich kid in American politics. Oh, well. Something doesn’t go your way. Just forget about it. Bush is eating major crow right now over not catching Bin Laden. His failure was Obama’s opportunity.

cjd ohio 1 said:
lol, same changed the subject and after the facts ran away, now you are trying to change it again, lol

I do things besides hopscotching through Mediaite like you. We were talking about Viet Nam. You tried to segue to Korea when I mentioned it as an example of “govspeak”. You blamed the Dems, although the biggest Cold Warriors were R’s. So, I listed two (R) military adventures.
Want to return to the topic, or just run and hide? Or non seq your way to you’re lol?
You should seek help, or you may find yourself LMAO ‘ing. Then what will you do?

WillP said:
I thought Matthews nailed it. Bush is the biggest, spoiled rich kid in American politics. Oh, well. Something doesn’t go your way. Just forget about it. Bush is eating major crow right now over not catching Bin Laden. His failure was Obama’s opportunity.

You are the biggest moron on this board.

Chris is delusional. Not a Bush hater? He needs to review transcripts from his old shows.

cjd ohio 1 said:
lol, same changed the subject and after the facts ran away, now you are trying to change it again, lol

BTW When did you last have a fact?

Glackin said:
BTW When did you last have a fact?

There have been many , Glackin . You may have missed some while you were banned . : (

Glackin said:
BTW When did you last have a fact?

all the stats posted on vietnam were facts, but not hard facts like my mom was drafted, so you wont understand them

And Hitler didn’t hate the Jews, but……….

cjd ohio 1 said:
all the stats posted on vietnam were facts, but not hard facts like my mom was drafted, so you wont understand them

Those were stats. “There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.” Mark Twain
If all you know about Viet Nam is stats, sue whatever schools you attended.
I thought you capable of actual discussion. I’ll put you in the bin with nutsofast and Garth and let you play and lol your assets off.

Glackin said:
Those were stats. “There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.” Mark TwainIf all you know about Viet Nam is stats, sue whatever schools you attended.I thought you capable of actual discussion. I’ll put you in the bin with nutsofast and Garth and let you play and lol your assets off.

and what facts and statistics were i wrong about then?

Sam M. said:
I remember Nixon (Vietnam) Raygun (high deficits which didn’t matter at the time), Bush 1 and 2 (deficits on top of deficits and near economic meltdown). Oops. Never mind. Democrats clean up the messes Republicans make. Always have, always will.

you want to play the nixon, vietnam thing too now

cjd ohio 1 said:
and what facts and statistics were i wrong about then?

thats what i thought glackin

cjd ohio 1 said:
thats what i thought glackin

You’re in the bin LOL!

Glackin said:
You’re in the bin LOL!

not one, lol, thats what i thought, now run along with your tail between you legs just like sam, facts are like kryptonite too folks like you two lol

**** {{w w w }} {{ happyshopping100 }} {{ com }} *****
The website whol esale for many kinds of fas hion sho es,
like the nik e,jord an,pr ada, also including the jea ns,shirts,bags,hat and the decorations.
All the products are free ship ping, and the the price is com petitive,
and also can accept the pay pal pay ment.
,after the paym ent, can ship within short time.
**** {{w w w }} {{ happyshopping100 }} {{ com }} ****
^^^^^wanna get more details , please enter our web^^^^^^^
PS.We are committed to providing high quality commodities at a reasonable price,
I believe that we have something for you. Please be assured that your choice and vision.

LOL!!

!!! – Not a Bush hater? !!!
That whole network advocates on behalf of Democrats, and propagandizes against Republicans.
LMAO!!!

OBAMA IS MEDIA CREATED & PROTECTED!
OBAMA IS MEDIA CREATED & PROTECTED!
OBAMA IS MEDIA CREATED & PROTECTED!

Joan Walsh (yuk!), Michael Ishakoff, Chris Matthews, and they get
more people making comments here on Mediaite than viewers!

cjd ohio 1 said:
you want to play the nixon, vietnam thing too now

I remember it as Nixon getting us out of a war the Dens got us into . And Reagan cleaning up the mess Carter left behind,

sponge bob said:
I remember it as Nixon getting us out of a war the Dens got us into . And Reagan cleaning up the mess Carter left behind,

…and did it all with a “Mainstream Media” manipulating the “news” to support and elect Democrats!

OBAMA IS MEDIA CREATED & PROTECTED!

OBAMA IS MEDIA CREATED & PROTECTED!

Leave BushDrunk alone. The poor mental midget is still trying to comprehend “My Pet Goat.” So he can explain it to other GOPsters. While sitting in his Ghillie Suit.

Wow, I have no clue what Mathews is smoking but it must cost him a fortune. He has shown to be a hater of anything conservative and that would INCLUDE Bush. He is old school Media and still believes if he says it, everyone will believe it. Sorry Libs, there are now very good alternatives to Liberal Media which tells it like it is. Your cover is blown, the lights are shinning alllll over you and your spin.

It is strange to me that the MSM can’t give Bush credit for what his administration did. His administration got the info on where Osama might be. They had troops all over the Afgan border and looked in caves. Obama wouldn’t make a decision for almost 2 years, then he drug his feet for 5 months. His administration made the decision, they gave the vice-president the intel. They pulled Obama off the golf course and let him watch. He is taking credit for things he didn’t do. This is normal for him. Bush did more to find Osama than Obama ever did.
Obama was too busy listening to Valerie to make a decision for himself. He just wanted to campaign and this is the only way he knew how. Why won’t the MSM report the real facts, not what the White House tells them to report?

As Bill Maher said Obama ate the Republicans for lunch and they can’t take it. They just hate that he is a lot smarter than they are, Too Bad.

butchbarb said:
It is strange to me that the MSM can’t give Bush credit for what his administration did. His administration got the info on where Osama might be. They had troops all over the Afgan border and looked in caves. Obama wouldn’t make a decision for almost 2 years, then he drug his feet for 5 months. His administration made the decision, they gave the vice-president the intel. They pulled Obama off the golf course and let him watch. He is taking credit for things he didn’t do. This is normal for him. Bush did more to find Osama than Obama ever did.
Obama was too busy listening to Valerie to make a decision for himself. He just wanted to campaign and this is the only way he knew how. Why won’t the MSM report the real facts, not what the White House tells them to report?

What a bunch of outright lies . You should be ashamed of yourself fabricating false information. You know that the Bush administration refused to send troops to the Tora Bora Mountains when Bin Laden was there. They hired Afghan mercenaries instead. It amazes me to see the level of out right dishonestly peddled on this blog. Have you no shame!

Why are oil companies charging so much for their oil? Main reason is, because they can. Why can they? Because all the oil companies formed a CARTEL, a Cartel is a group of companies joined together and cooperates to STOP COMPETETION, a sort of clever method of PRICE FIXING. There is abundance of Crude Oil and they continue to raise the price until a large number of buyers stop buying, they then lower the price again until they start buying again. “They call this what the market will bear”. The people using these barrels of oil are (captive customers) which makes the business men suppliers look like greedy hard core profiteers. This does maximize their profits but they are killing the bees that make the Honey. Do they also think; “there are plenty more bees where they came from”?
The Gasoline prices are pretty much the same. They raise the price of a gallon of gasoline until a large number of people quit buying, then they lower the price until everyone starts buying again. This is a sensible way of arriving at a price for products not related to the necessities of life. Price gouging on products produced for the necessities of life and economic stability and progress should be classed as a heinous act and unethical in all business. On the necessities of Life, people will buy till they go broke or die. That is no civilized way of setting prices.
The only thing greedy business men understand is legislation. Legislation is like a contract. Every business man will tell you, when doing business never work without a contract. New Legislation should be implemented and adjusted frequently to keep business fair and running smoother.