Fact: Lame street media as a whole roled a gutterball on this one. Here’s pie in your eye! Hahahahahaha…….

How about “Water is wet,” or “The sky is blue” for a headline?

Paranoia and victimization. Victimization and paranoia. The persistent themes of the GOP! No one was disappointed. Everyone was predicting a snooze fest. Palin proves you can shine Krap, but it holds its luster for mere moments. The luster is long gone.

The level to which the corrupt liberal media and the liberal minions that follow them hate Palin is disgusting and humorous at the same time.

Pretty phenominal how in your face biased all this is. How in the world do you do this to a former governor not even running for president or currently involved with politics and simultaneously not ask a thing about our unknown president with the shady connnection and backround?

Simply impossible to carry on like this and not be seen as biased.

Any libs want to try?

I feel sorry for all of the disappointed people of the Lib/Prog Party.  They were duped into believing that they were on some sort of righteous mission that would finally confirm their “feelings”…you know that Sarah Palin is satan incarnate.  

Maybe if they scavange through another 24k emails?  

Palin’s alarm clock is probably programmed to wake her up to Lady Gaga’s “Paparazzi” every morning.

It is amazing. They don’t want to learn anything about our president and label anyone who does a racist. Yet, they suddenly become sleuths again when they’re trying to attack a woman who holds no office what so ever.

It reminds me of this retarded interview between Tom Brokaw and Charlie Gibson. Neither of them knows “much about Obama” and neither seems all that interested in just asking the tough questions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzMas1bVidw

It is quite amazing how the whole thing with the emails turned out. They hyped them to a ridiculous level and we all learned…that Sarah Palin was an effective and conscientious governor (at least before the liberals began their scorched earth tactics), articulate and unconcerned with partisanship. It’s almost as if she had deputized those that hated her the most to campaign for her. She’s come a long way since 2008, when it was obvious she was shellshocked by the media’s hatefest.

Poor leftist swine. They really can’t get over their hatred and obsession with Ms. Palin.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Paranoia and victimization. Victimization and paranoia. The persistent themes of the GOP! No one was disappointed. Everyone was predicting a snooze fest. Palin proves you can shine Krap, but it holds its luster for mere moments. The luster is long gone.

You truly are the most delusion idiot here. Paranoia and especially victimization are liberal traits. Was it supposed to make you feel good to spew some clearly backwards liberal talking point then scurry along? Were you hoping you could post your nonsense and not get called out on it?

Thats why they drafted and hired people in a massive rush to go over 20 something thousand emails, because they knew there was nothing there and it would be a “snooze fest?” You are to dumb to believe. On top of years of unjust and wrong attacks, no one was disapointed to not find MORE nonsense to attack her on? Again, you are to dumb to believe.

Fourth Estate influence is on a downward spiral…
bad “news” for Team Obama in 2012…

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Paranoia and victimization. Victimization and paranoia. The persistent themes of the GOP! No one was disappointed. Everyone was predicting a snooze fest. Palin proves you can shine Krap, but it holds its luster for mere moments. The luster is long gone.

You have to admit… they are her go-to whipping girl. Olbermann made a career out of it. Not that she doesn’t invite most of it.

tatboy said:
Not that she doesn’t invite most of it.

Yep, I hear she uses it to buy real estate in the 48.

Liberal media seems amazed at the disconnect between what the emails represent, a sensible and engaged governer (compared to say a certain resident of a certain house painted white that is a no show on most issues until other’s have done all the work and negotiating) and their caraciture of her as a ditzy moron. They don’t seem to get they built Obama up to be a god and build Palin up to be the ditzy glamour loving moron. They are wrong on both counts.

Why rely on emails for that when you can just listen to her talk?

Thelonious Funk said:
Why rely on emails for that when you can just listen to her talk?

That, my friend, is the great mystery.

perceptorii said:
They hyped them to a ridiculous level and we all learned…that Sarah Palin was an effective and conscientious governor

There was little if any hype.

And, don’t forget we learned the extent to which the Palins went to get the citizens of Alaska to pay for her children’s personal travel. That was in there as well.

Thelonious Funk said:
Why rely on emails for that when you can just listen to her talk?

Indeed. And, her babbling is far more revealing than her e-mails.

tatboy said:
THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Paranoia and victimization. Victimization and paranoia. The persistent themes of the GOP! No one was disappointed. Everyone was predicting a snooze fest. Palin proves you can shine Krap, but it holds its luster for mere moments. The luster is long gone.

You have to admit… they are her go-to whipping girl. Olbermann made a career out of it. Not that she doesn’t invite most of it.

“Whipping girl.”? I would disagree with that term. Source of ridicule? Clearly.

No, the emails don’t prove Palin is stupid. It’s the things she says that prove it.

They sure were. The biggest revelation? SP recommended low carb diets for school children.

Now the MSM media are trying to get scientists to do a study that shows massive sugar intake is actually GOOD for kids.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
They’s the facts, madam.

Learn to use the quote function better. And what’s wrong with using state/federal funds on your children’s travel if you are a ranking government official? If the Obama children are not under secret service protection at all times, let me be the first to cry foul.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
No one was disappointed. Everyone was predicting a snooze fest

LOL

Now I won’t have to go out for lunch- you just gave us a whopper!

W.I.S.C said:
THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
They’s the facts, madam.

Learn to use the quote function better. And what’s wrong with using state/federal funds on your children’s travel if you are a ranking government official? If the Obama children are not under secret service protection at all times, let me be the first to cry foul.

I was illegal under Alaska law. And, the e-mails show that Palin and her staff knew that.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Indeed. And, her babbling is far more revealing than her e-mails.

As Obama would say; “Uh Uh Uh Umm Umm Uh Uh Uh Uh… Let me be clear, Uh, Umm, Uh Uh Uh Uh Uh”

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
I was illegal under Alaska law. And, the e-mails show that Palin and her staff knew that.

Reminder #2 to learn to use the quote function better. Does your illegal Alaskan status really bother you THAT much, and did you really pour through all those emails to pull THAT little nugget out?

teccec said:
As Obama would say; “Uh Uh Uh Umm Umm Uh Uh Uh Uh… Let me be clear, Uh, Umm, Uh Uh Uh Uh Uh”

Do you really want to compare Obama’s diction to Palin’s?

Like a third grade boy who keeps talking about a girl he doesn’t like. You can bet that’s the one he has a crush on.

W.I.S.C said:
Do you really want to compare Obama’s diction to Palin’s?

I’d compare Palins message to Obama’s any day. She speaks honestly and consistantly and with a positive outlook on America and its dominant values. She hasn’t spent her entire adult life talking instead of doing, she’s spent a heck of a lot more time doing instead of talking. Our leaders need to be more than just teleprompter reading mouthpieces, they need to make decisions and should be leading from the front not the back of issues.

W.I.S.C said:
THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
I was illegal under Alaska law. And, the e-mails show that Palin and her staff knew that.

Reminder #2 to learn to use the quote function better. Does your illegal Alaskan status really bother you THAT much, and did you really pour through all those emails to pull THAT little nugget out?

No, if you’d ever listened to the news, you would have known about this tawdry episode with Oak. The e-mails merely confirmed Palin was am ethically-challenged crook.

This massive media appeal for the public’s help has got the most UNself-conscious, let-it-all-hang-out action since the media fell all over itself laughing over Pres. Obama’s joke that he turned over in bed to ask NBC’s Brian Williams his opinion on matters.

Eight posts and counting.

Jaurez said:
Phonies are illegal, everywhere.

Well, not illegal, but UTTERLY bemusing in their hard-to-fathom shamelessness.

I’m hoping the emails will make the GOP establishment will turn around and support Sarah Palin for 2012 too. Ya, wishful thinking ;p

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
No, if you’d ever listened to the news, you would have known about this tawdry episode with Oak. The e-mails merely confirmed Palin was am ethically-challenged crook.

You really are a weiner when it comes to quoting, aren’t you . . . who REALLY cares about tawdry partisan points regarding the Palin emails? I bet you were a “volunteer” and a supporter of a certain NY Congressman because of nothing more than a “letter.”

“(s)he’s a (D)(R) so I’ll support no matter what” – That’s you, big guy.

Hamilton said:
Looks like Mediate is banishing conservative posters again!

That’s how they roll. What was objectionable about that comment? Oh I know, it came from a conservative. You’re doin a great job, LIzzie!!

When Palin’s e-mails requested during campaign , the media heard about this :

Obama’s friend Ayers wrote ” Dreams ” .
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/06/why_uks_daily_mail_got_cold_feet_on_dreams_fraud.html
Obama attended Jew hating Farrakhan’s march .
Obama praising Jew hating Rashid Khalidi at farewell dinner .
Obama attends Jew hating Wright’s church for 20 years.
Obama’s shady deals with Tony Rezko .
Obama belonged to Dem. Socialist party in Chicago .

Investigate Obama ? No !

Get Palin !

And they haven’t stopped.

It is a shame those e mails didn’t reveal anything. The left already had the streets cleared for dancing.

Attention all ‘Palin Haters’ !
Why dont you check out some of the emails sent by Sarah Palin. Click on the following link to read one of the emails.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2002688/Sarah-Palin-plays-God-touching-email-unborn-son-Trigs-Downs-Syndrome.html

Guys– I’ve had to beat back a lot of infighting in threads this morning. Keep it on topic and polite.

Eddie Upchurch said:
Guys– I’ve had to beat back a lot of infighting in threads this morning. Keep it on topic and polite.

Does constructive criticism count as on topic and polite?

teccec said:
I’d compare Palins message to Obama’s any day. She speaks honestly and consistantly and with a positive outlook on America and its dominant values. She hasn’t spent her entire adult life talking instead of doing, she’s spent a heck of a lot more time doing instead of talking. Our leaders need to be more than just teleprompter reading mouthpieces, they need to make decisions and should be leading from the front not the back of issues.

Okay, but who’s been talking instead of doing (for OUR benefit) for the past two years, B-Rock or Sar-A? Like him or not, the President has been “doing” what he thinks is in America’s best interests since he got sworn in. Palin’s been on book tours. Both fight bottom feeder mediaites. So, what?

W.I.S.C said:
Okay, but who’s been talking instead of doing (for OUR benefit) for the past two years, B-Rock or Sar-A? Like him or not, the President has been “doing” what he thinks is in America’s best interests since he got sworn in. Palin’s been on book tours. Both fight bottom feeder mediaites. So, what?

Like Jimmy Carter (and Joe Biden as vp) the President is President just by waking up and going golfing every few days. Has he made some decisions? Comparing anyone to a sitting President isnt a fair comparison. Compare Palin (while out of office) to Obama when he was Senator is more realistic, and I’d argue Palin has been far more influential to both sides of the aisle than Obama was, until he became the nominee front runner anyways, and remember, Palin isn’t even running, she;s positioning herself to dominate the convention, which she’ll almost certainly be successful at doing.

Dana is spot on accurate; the media HATE Palin with a passion for the sole reason that she birthed Trig; they all would have aborted him or supported his abortion.

Sarah is a smart woman who has been slandered by the US Media because of their hatred for her Christian beliefs and because they adore the manchild for some odd reason.

Funny how they never submitted a FOIA for HIS records, oh no, he is to be protected at all costs. The media have turned themselves into propagandists for the DNC and team Obama…they are NOT to be trusted on anything anymore; you have anchors that bow to hehimself, those who bat their eyelashses and hehimself, and then those who claim tingles and “it is my responsibility to ensure he succeeds”. that is today’s media – propagandists by their own admission

sry, had started to say has he made decisions, yes, has Palin said silly things, yes, but neither of them spends most of their time doing that – but that’s a weak and dumb argument. The President makes decisions every day, its part of the job, and Palin haters would argue most of what comes out of her mouth is silly. I agree with the former, disagree with the latter, but it still isn’t a useful argument to use as a comparison of the two.

What? The scavengers didn’t find anything of importance?

In that case they better work on burying this story as fast as possible because it shows Sarah in a positive spotlight…haha

How do you say “back fire in your face” in Liberalese?

Colorado_Conservative said:
What? The scavengers didn’t find anything of importance?

In that case they better work on burying this story as fast as possible because it shows Sarah in a positive spotlight…haha

How do you say “back fire in your face” in Liberalese?

Maybe they’d say Don’t Retreat, Reload! Though not in so ‘few’ words…

W.I.S.C said:
Does constructive criticism count as on topic and polite?

No it’s not, those comments get deleted.

Who is more disappointed this morning, Sarah Palin haters, or LeBron’s #1 fanboy in the White House?
Bwahahahahahaha!
You just know Obama was day dreaming about how great it would have been to have his buddy LeBron over at the White House as NBA champion, but now he’s going to have to settle for Dirk Nowitzki

“Media Was ‘Disappointed’ Palin’s Emails Did Not Prove She Was Stupid Or Evil” – word.

Fact: They said that we would never see anything like Geraldo Rivera went underground in Chicago to dig up Al Capone’s vault? But they were wrong. Hahahahahahaha…………..

THE REAL RABID KOOK said:
Paranoia and victimization. Victimization and paranoia. The persistent themes of the GOP! No one was disappointed. Everyone was predicting a snooze fest.

Everyone, Kook?

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Anybody else find it odd that Sarah shoved Brisket, Oak and Cessna into her campaign bus and propelled herself inside, zooming off into some late Spring hibernation event as the release of these e-mails neared?

You lie, boy.

I think he had to catch a plane or go to the pool or something.

writer said:
I think he had to catch a plane or go to the pool or something.

Oh man, your comment reminded me of an apartment I lived in back in the day. It was right next to the pool and EVERY SINGLE day, this guy greased himself up with baby oil and laid out by the pool in his THONG!! People, thongs are a privedge, not a right!

THE REAL RABID KOOK said:
I was illegal under Alaska law.

Alaskans are pretty wise, huh Kook?

LT, it’s all in how one accessorizes. An Obama cap and earrings go with almost anything. Casual or formal.

At this point it looks like Palin will walk away from the “e-mail dump” without any major lasting damage.

Where the fireworks begin is when Palin decides to runs for POTUS (which I believe she will). The battle between Democrats and Palin will take second fiddle to the battle within the Republican party.

Despite claims by the far right, Mitt Romney is a strong candidate, can attract centrists, and has support from the establishment. Romney supporters are also less sensitive to attacks on him by members of his own party and have the advantage of “been there done that”. They are reality based enough to realize conflict is part and parcel of a nominating system for becoming the Republican nominee.

Sarah Palin’s supporters are far more sensitive to criticism levied against her by members of her own party. She has never ran in a presidential primary before. The Democrats versus Palin battle will tend to fade away and the action will explode within the republican party with Romney, Palin, and a possible third person in a battle royale . Sarah Palin’s supporters (and they are dedicated and loyal, I will give them that) expect a coronation by her party and take any criticism towards her by republicans as unforgivable heresy. They hold grudges and are poor at compromising.

I expect total war, and Romney will most likely win but nothing is certain. While Hillary’s supporters had their issues with Obama, a large majority of them still voted and voted for Obama. Many Palin supporters will refuse to vote for Romney. A spoiler third party run by Palin or a similar candidate materializes.

For us that lean towards the left it will all be entertaining if nothing else.

Perino doubted the media would ever be as interested in all documents that might actually matter to the nation, like emails related to recent National Labor Relations hearings. Good luck finding readers who would eagerly volunteer to help newspapers read those emails.

AMEN!!!!

But, but… Palin’s stupid and vindictive, how can all those emails not support that proggie notion of her?

Hahaha….. Sort of like Al Copone’s secret vault, isn’t it? :)

Just4thefax said: ..
Geraldo Rivera went underground in Chicago to dig up Al Capone’s vault?

I guess I’m not surprised that other people thought of that one. :)

writer said:
LT, it’s all in how one accessorizes. An Obama cap and earrings go with almost anything. Casual or formal.

That’s an image I won’t be able to get rid of anytime soon! Thanks alot!

Just think of it, if dana perino and the fox sewer friends study really, really hard, they might rise to palin’s intellectual level — something to shoot for, I would think.

Nature Freak said:
At this point it looks like Palin will walk away from the “e-mail dump” without any major lasting damage.

Where the fireworks begin is when Palin decides to runs for POTUS (which I believe she will). The battle between Democrats and Palin will take second fiddle to the battle within the Republican party.

Despite claims by the far right, Mitt Romney is a strong candidate, can attract centrists, and has support from the establishment. Romney supporters are also less sensitive to attacks on him by members of his own party and have the advantage of “been there done that”. They are reality based enough to realize conflict is part and parcel of a nominating system for becoming the Republican nominee.

Sarah Palin’s supporters are far more sensitive to criticism levied against her by members of her own party. She has never ran in a presidential primary before. The Democrats versus Palin battle will tend to fade away and the action will explode within the republican party with Romney, Palin, and a possible third person in a battle royale . Sarah Palin’s supporters (and they are dedicated and loyal, I will give them that) expect a coronation by her party and take any criticism towards her by republicans as unforgivable heresy. They hold grudges and are poor at compromising.

I expect total war, and Romney will most likely win but nothing is certain. While Hillary’s supporters had their issues with Obama, a large majority of them still voted and voted for Obama. Many Palin supporters will refuse to vote for Romney. A spoiler third party run by Palin or a similar candidate materializes.

For us that lean towards the left it will all be entertaining if nothing else.

Gee, I take it you are left of center? McCain ran as a centrest (and part time old angry dude), Romney was out-centered by McCain but otherwise is attractive to the left precisely because he is a centrist. Hate to break the news to you, but most Republicans are conservative. Romney is attractive for his financial qualitifications only. If a viable conservative gets in the race (Palin, Christie, Perry) Romney will likely be an also ran this time too. To his advanatage is the positive media he’ll get compared to conservative candidates, the ‘its your turn’ mentality since like Hilary he came in 2nd last time, and his leftover campaign workers from the prior effort. He’s definately one to watch, but isn’t likely to be the candidate selected at the convention.

I frankly hope Bachman does well, I’d like to see her as a VP if not President. I think she’d do a good job but I’m not yet convinced she’d put together a team of allstars to support her administration – only because I don’t know that she has the ear of enough high-level players in the party. If she has party support and gets a good staff, I would be very proud to have her as a P or VP.

teccec said:
Gee, I take it you are left of center? McCain ran as a centrest (and part time old angry dude), Romney was out-centered by McCain but otherwise is attractive to the left precisely because he is a centrist. Hate to break the news to you, but most Republicans are conservative. Romney is attractive for his financial qualitifications only. If a viable conservative gets in the race (Palin, Christie, Perry) Romney will likely be an also ran this time too. To his advanatage is the positive media he’ll get compared to conservative candidates, the ‘its your turn’ mentality since like Hilary he came in 2nd last time, and his leftover campaign workers from the prior effort. He’s definately one to watch, but isn’t likely to be the candidate selected at the convention.

Most Republicans are conservative but not all, and the word “conservative” means so many things in this day and age and is so mushy new descriptive words need to be used. BTW, Romney was socially moderate in Massachusetts and while this could hurt him in the primaries and caucuses, it could help him in the general as people are rapidly becoming more supportive of issues such as gay rights (check out new Gallup results). Perry has his own problems and many Americans do not want another Texan in the White house anytime soon, though I do not count him out. Christie could be a considerable threat to Romney but I doubt he runs.

BTW, do not underestimate the Rep. establishment’s dislike of Palin or the power they still hold. And also remember, the Republicans still has many voting “RINO’s as the far right likes to say. You may not like them, but their vote counts too and they are turned of by the Christian right and Palin.

And as Woody Allen said “Eighty percent of success is showing up.” Mitt Romney is campaigning and showing up. Mitt has been doing this for a long time. From my own life experience, this fact counts for something.

N.F

Everyone understands the behavior of drug addicts who don’t get their drug fix – they become uncontrollably violent, resort to insane acts that destroy property and kill and injure innocent people and do whatever they can to get money for their next dose.

Remember that while thinking about the fact that the massively PDS (Palin Derangement Syndrome) – inflicted lunatic-left d-cRAT socialists, whose hatred for one of America’s most effective and accomplished political leaders knows no bounds, have totally, utterly and completely FAILED in their latest effort to find the slightest bit of dirt on the distinguished former governor after pouring through thousands and thousands of her e-mails. They wound up with Zilch, Zero, Nada, Nothing, Zip – and they didn’t get their drug FIX !!!!!

Like the drug addicts they so resemble, the PDS lunatic-left d-cRAT socialists are now likely to explode into even further uncontrollable fits of anger and violence against NORMAL, SANE, PATRIOTIC American citizens. They will make their follow lunatics, the GOONS and THUGS of public-sector unions, look like tame pets in comparison. The burning of Greece by their fellow socialists will probably serve as a guide to the actions of the d-cRAT socialists.

Please prepare to protect yourself and your family from the predictable behavior of these out-of-control d-cRAT socialist extremists and their stooges in the lamestream socialist fake-news media.

TeaPartyNation said:
Everyone understands the behavior of drug addicts who don’t get their drug fix – they become uncontrollably violent, resort to insane acts that destroy property and kill and injure innocent people and do whatever they can to get money for their next dose.

Remember that while thinking about the fact that the massively PDS (Palin Derangement Syndrome) – inflicted lunatic-left d-cRAT socialists, whose hatred for one of America’s most effective and accomplished political leaders knows no bounds, have totally, utterly and completely FAILED in their latest effort to find the slightest bit of dirt on the distinguished former governor after pouring through thousands and thousands of her e-mails. They wound up with Zilch, Zero, Nada, Nothing, Zip – and they didn’t get their drug FIX !!!!!

Like the drug addicts they so resemble, the PDS lunatic-left d-cRAT socialists are now likely to explode into even further uncontrollable fits of anger and violence against NORMAL, SANE, PATRIOTIC American citizens. They will make their follow lunatics, the GOONS and THUGS of public-sector unions, look like tame pets in comparison. The burning of Greece by their fellow socialists will probably serve as a guide to the actions of the d-cRAT socialists.

Please prepare to protect yourself and your family from the predictable behavior of these out-of-control d-cRAT socialist extremists and their stooges in the lamestream socialist fake-news media.

You are not helping your cause. This article sounds like something from the John Birch Society. You talk about “uncontrollable fits of anger” but your whole article is an example of an “uncontrollable fit of anger”.

teccec said:
I think she’d do a good job but I’m not yet convinced she’d put together a team of allstars to support her administration –

Her hiring Ed Rollins is creeping me out a little.

Right. Her everyday life proves that quite sufficiently.

Pablo said:
Her hiring Ed Rollins is creeping me out a little.

Oh my. Indeed,Rollins is a very creepy character w a crawly background. He latches on to the most bizarre of hustlers.

Nachi said:
Oh my. Indeed,Rollins is a very creepy character w a crawly background. He latches on to the most bizarre of hustlers.

Ed Rollins was one of the masterminds behind Reagan’s reelection over Walter Mondale in 1984. In 1984 Ed was strategically brilliant . He is quirky and runs his mouth, but is another one not to underestimate.

Q. How does the media’s coverage of this compare with instances in which they have scrutinized a Democrat politician’s emails?

A. You can’t answer that because the mainstream media has never scrutinized a Democrat politician’s emails.

DonnySilver said:
Washington is making up all the ridiculous news stories for the media to report on. Do you really care which reporter called which reporter stupid? Who threw glitter at Newt Gingrich, or who farted on The View?

Here’s what the feds don’t want you to know.

http://illuminaticonspiracy.blogspot.com/p/coming-soon-media-site-comment.html

I went to your “Bin Laden is code” web page. The fact remains that you have a web page plus comments all over the internet at various news sites. This negates the entire premise of your article about you being suppressed. If what you said in the article was true you would right now be at Gitmo.

Paranoia is not always a higher state of awareness.

Palin is too stupid and brainless to say anything interesting in an e-mail.

The e-mails reveal a governor of limited intelligence. That’s why intelligence agencies such as the CIA refused to waterboard Sarah Palin.

Eddie Upchurch said:
Guys– I’ve had to beat back a lot of infighting in threads this morning. Keep it on topic and polite.

Thanks, Eddie, for trying to keep things civil here. And thanks for deleting comments that are obscene, insulting, etc. These really have no place here, and Mediaite is better without them on its pages.

felixw said:
Q. How does the media’s coverage of this compare with instances in which they have scrutinized a Democrat politician’s emails? A. You can’t answer that because the mainstream media has never scrutinized a Democrat politician’s emails.

Wonder why they wouldn’t want fo foia the e-mail of Rod Blagojevich. What’s that arguement the libs use for Weiner and Vitter?

Colorado_Conservative said:
How do you say “back fire in your face” in Liberalese?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWBUl7oT9sA

Ladies and gentlemen,Hello everybody,
input this URL: === http://globalsell.org/ ===
shirts, bags, hat and the decorations.
you can find many cheap and fashion stuff (jor dan shoes)
(NBA NFL NHL MLB jersey)
( lv handbag)
(cha nel wallet)
(D&G sunglasses)
(ed har dy jacket)
(UGG boot)
and so on..welcome to our website:
( http://globalsell.org/)
we sincerely hope to establish the business relation with you.
Looking forward your visit.

sarainitaly said:
“Media Was ‘Disappointed’ Palin’s Emails Did Not Prove She Was Stupid Or Evil” – word.

Hey girlfriend, mind if I stalk you from afar…ok..really.. I’m joking…promise no Weiner pics here.

Maybe someone out there in this thread has ask this question or answered this question already. But with all the news about not finding anything negative or damning as somehow being news, has anyone released the “good stuff”?… and I don’t mean the “good stuff” as in bad for Sarah, I mean the good stuff that actually does show us she was doing a good job.

By the way, as to not being news..The only news here is that the media and left again need to be ashamed of themselves.

Nature Freak said:
And as Woody Allen said “Eighty percent of success is showing up.” Mitt Romney is campaigning and showing up. Mitt has been doing this for a long time. From my own life experience, this fact counts for something.

N.F

NATUREFREAK,

On another Post I asked if you were the same “Nature Freak” only with a different picture?

I’ve read your Posts and don’t believe so. You express yourself better and seem more thoughtful.

So, the mystery is—What have YOU done with the other NATURE FREAK? Hmm. I see through your clever ploy!