(JPost)
— Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood (the guys the Obama administration supports) will not recognize Israel “under any
circumstance,” the party’s deputy leader Dr Rashad Bayoumi told Arabic
daily al-Hayat in an interview publish Sunday.
In recent Egyptian elections the party list led by the Brotherhood’s
Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) won 36.3 percent of the list vote, while
the ultra-conservative Salafi al-Nour Party took 28.8%.
When asked whether it is a requirement for the government in Egypt to
recognize Israel, Bayoumi responded by saying: “This is not an option,
whatever the circumstances, we do not recognize Israel at all. Its
[Israel] an occupying criminal enemy.”
The deputy leader stressed during the interview that no Muslim
Brotherhood members would ever meet with Israelis for negotiations. “I
will not allow myself to sit down with criminals.”
Bayoumi went on to say that The Muslim Brotherhood would take legal
procedures towards cancelling the peace treaty between Egypt and Israel
that was signed in 1979. “The Brotherhood respects international
conventions, but we will take legal action against the peace treaty with
the Zionist entity,” he told the paper.

http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=251732&R=R3

And somewhere, Tim Russert is retching.

Is that Santorum on Crugnale’s lips?

Why, yes it is.

Challenging the frothy mixture on his lies is not advoacy journalism.  Crugnale apparently prefers the “interview” fellatio of Tim Russert, who kept silent when Cheney said Iraq had nukes.

Santorum is right.  Iran has already annexed the Sudetenland and the invasion of Poland is imminent.

WASHINGTON - The United States would be “satisfied” if fair
parliamentary elections in Egypt produced a Muslim Brotherhood victory,
President Barack Obama’s pointman for democratic transitions in the
Middle East said late Friday. “I think the answer is yes, I think we
will be satisfied, if it is a free and fair election,” the newly
appointed special
coordinator for Middle East transitions, William
Taylor, said when asked about what the US reaction would be if the
Islamist party comes out ahead in elections starting this month.

The Obama administration said for the first time that it supports a role
for groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood, a banned Islamist
organization, in a reformed Egyptian government.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-fg-us-egypt-20110201,0,2958266.story

Sucking on Dick Cheney will cause that reaction.

WASHINGTON - The United States would be “satisfied” if fair parliamentary elections in Egypt produced a Muslim Brotherhood victory, President Barack Obama’s pointman for democratic transitions in the Middle East said late Friday. “I think the answer is yes, I think we will be satisfied, if it is a free and fair election,” the newly
appointed special coordinator for Middle East transitions, William Taylor, said when asked about what the US reaction would be if the Islamist party comes out ahead in elections starting this month.

If Gregory is going to advocate for the Obama administration, he should at the very least have a freaking clue about what he is talking about. Santorum ate his lunch.

The real story will be when Gregory doesn’t defend Obama.  The media will go farther and farther out there as the election draws closer.  They didn’t learn their lesson in 2008 when the american people knew that the media was owned by Obama. Look to see Fox news ratings skyrocket while the MSM rat pack goes on the Obama re election offensive.  The public won’t be fooled this time.

Facts are of no use to Gregory. He’s an Obama salad tosser from the very beginning. Santorum kicked his ass.

Gregory has a long history of being an Obama apologist and a notorious rumpswab.
Did he actually call the overthrow of Mubarak and the riots in Tahrir square “democracy”…..?
Honest to god…..I get more reliable information on Twitter than I can on NBC.
Gregory is a friggin’ joke.
Iran has been emboldened by the treachery and treason of Democrats and that is a fact.

“While Santorum did not protest Gregory’s aggressive questioning, the heavy-handed way in which the Meet The Press
host continued to persistently hammer him will most likely will spur
accusations of bias in his defense of the Obama Administration.”

And it will completely justified. Gregory’s only real talent is impersonating Tom Brokow. Oh, and as an advocate for the Democrat Party. he’s VERY good at that.

You call that “defending”?
He even let him get in a “he comes from Chicago” plate of B.S….
I think James is still hungover..

David works for the National Barak Channel – he will probably get a nice big bonus for his defense and advocacy of Team Obama today.

How utterly pathetic, this is the same network that pushed “Bush is a war criminal” and now praises Obama for carrying on Bush’s policies, to a large degree.

Anyone who trusts a word said on NBC and out of the mouth of David, the bower or anyone else on the network needs to have their head examined.  These guys will continue to campaign for Obama and will openly support him, vote for him, praise him, etc., and demean and diminish any conservative/republican.

NBC must be so proud of the Sunday host….good boy David, Obama loves his lapdoggies.

hey who cares? even the MSM lunkheads like gragory cant drag that dead stinking administration of obama accross the finish line in Nov. he’s toast. and gone and we can begin to have econ growth again. finally. they, the MSM are on display for all to see as laughable shills. everyone wins. big deal. none of them (the gregorys) matter to anyone anymore. sheesh.

What a bunch of conservative morons on this thread.  On an actual network, a journalist asks actual probing questions of a conservative and that’s called “advocacy”.  Poll after poll documents that viewers of FAUX News are dumber about current events than people who watch no TV at all.  Whether Obama deserves reelection is one thing.  But he will win reelection in no small part due to the fact that the GOP couldn’t field anything beyond its crop of mental midgets.  You heard it here first. The next Republican to serve as POTUS is someone who’s not currently running …

David Gregory Defends President Obama…

Yeah, that’s pretty much what this hack has done for the past three years. NBC’s finest indeed.

From you own link
LIAR

The organization must reject violence and recognize democratic goals if
the U.S. is to be comfortable with it taking part in the government, the
White House said.

http://spreadingsantorum.com/

The irritating thing about democracies is that elections sometimes do not go the way you would like them to. That does not make the result void.

You cannot, on one hand, advocate for democratic elections, then on the other hand reject them.
Gregory is taking Santorum to task for this glaring inconsistency. 
Taking this to its logical conclusion, I reject the results of the 2010 election here because it did not come out the way I wanted it to, even though it was democratic.

He is going to say some foreign scientist is an ‘enemy combatant’? What a twat.

 Typical liberal trash no doubt spouted by  a double digit IQ welfare case.

 What lies?

But you just rather have Santorum throw out lies without any objection like they do over at FOX.

 Oh please. That poll was from freaking Farleigh Dickinson: average SAT score of incoming freshman 1100/2400.

Moreover, there’s more to democracy than elections.    We’re talking about constitutions and core beliefs of people.       These things can’t be changed overnight.   

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

Poor, dear Roger385, you need to catch up already. Most conservatives are a ‘live-and-let-live’ bunch – and even we (those you stereotype as “Faux News viewers”) understand polls.

Here’s a suggestion for you to ponder: Read up on the devastating effects of a nuclear attack on Israel or the U.S., introduce yourself to actual quotes from the insane, radical president of Iran, and come back soon and remind us again of why you’re so much more clever than the majority of Americans who are a bit tired of carrying your dead weight and propping up your intellectual laziness in the grand scheme of natural selection.

As your smug, pretentious self seems to be a bit behind the curve, the rest of the healthy gene pool recognizes the risks involved with a nuclear Iran, so perhaps you should steer clear of serious political discourse in the future. If I wanted to hear an Ed Schultz promo, I’d actually hook up my cable and watch cable news.

Signed,

Another “FAUX News” minion, who is actively boycotting my cable provider for 2 yrs. and counting

BREAKING: Fox News is only on cable   

Yeah, you neocons who decided to bomb Iraq into the 14th Century, sacrificing thousands of American lives, tens of thousands of Iraqi civilian lives, and trillions of dollars … for sure, a live and let live bunch. And yet even your boy Dubya didn’t take any more aggressive actions toward Iran than has Obama. Wonder why that is.

________________________________
From: Disqus
To: dallas.dunn@prodigy.net
Sent: Sunday, January 1, 2012 3:02 PM
Subject: [mediaite] Re: David Gregory Defends President Obama Against Rick Santorum’s Accusation Of Appeasement

Disqus generic email template

MuddleVanHeck wrote, in response to roger385:
Poor, dear Roger385, you need to catch up already. Most conservatives are a ‘live-and-let-live’ bunch – and even we (those you stereotype as “Faux News viewers”) understand polls.
Here’s a suggestion for you to ponder: Read up on the devastating effects of a nuclear attack on Israel or the U.S., introduce yourself to actual quotes from the insane, radical president of Iran, and come back soon and remind us again of why you’re so much more clever than the majority of Americans who are a bit tired of carrying your dead weight and propping up your intellectual laziness in the grand scheme of natural selection.
As your smug, pretentious self seems to be a bit behind the curve, the rest of the healthy gene pool recognizes the risks involved with a nuclear Iran, so perhaps you should steer clear of serious political discourse in the future. If I wanted to hear an Ed Schultz promo, I’d actually hook up my cable and watch cable news.
Signed,

Another “FAUX News” minion, who is actively boycotting my cable provider for 2 yrs. and counting
BREAKING: Fox News is only on cable

   Link to comment

Yeah, we literally appease people to death.

I was really struck with how Bin Laden was appeased in the head.

Oh Tiny.  You do not know how to do anything aside from BS.

Have you ever contributed to any conversation in your life?  

Gregory asked a fair question about Iran.  You just went ape-poopy stupid as you usually do and didn’t give it a second thought.

You live in a world so Manichean that the definition is above your head.

Apparently Neville Chamerlain is more popular dead than he is alive.

Wish I had his umbrella though.  That looks great.

The parts where Santorum’s froth-covered lips moved.

I agree with the plan.Let the bunker busters fly!

I was struck by how George W. Bush killed bin Laden.

When George said, “dead or alive,” bin Laden said “alive,” and George said, “yes, sir.”

Yeah, nice try. I love how you keep trying to stereotype everyone who disagrees with you. Meanwhile, let’s focus on Obama, shall we? 

Why did he refuse to support the Iranian uprising? Why has he refused to implement the recommended sanctions? What warnings were issued by the UNs nuclear inspectors a few months ago?

Like I said, if I wanted to hear propaganda, I’d actually waste my time watching cable news or David Gregory.

David Gregory gets tingles when he sees Obama.

What sanctions have not been implemented? You mean sanctions that primarily devastate the Iranian citizenry? And I realize you’re allergic to actual journalism, which explains your reaction to David Gregory. But at least you’ve got those intellectual giants Hannity, Limbaugh and O’Reilly to keep feeding you nonsense.

________________________________
From: Disqus
To: dallas.dunn@prodigy.net
Sent: Sunday, January 1, 2012 3:29 PM
Subject: [mediaite] Re: David Gregory Defends President Obama Against Rick Santorum’s Accusation Of Appeasement

Disqus generic email template

MuddleVanHeck wrote, in response to roger385:
Yeah, nice try. I love how you keep trying to stereotype everyone who disagrees with you. Meanwhile, let’s focus on Obama, shall we?
Why did he refuse to support the Iranian uprising? Why has he refused to implement the recommended sanctions? What warnings were issued by the UNs nuclear inspectors a few months ago?
Like I said, if I wanted to hear propaganda, I’d actually waste my time watching cable news or David Gregory. Link to comment

Wow, so when there is a push back on GOP talking points, it must be the “liberal media”?  The fact is no one challenges anyone (Dems or Republicans) any more they just let them spew their talking points and move on.  When are we going to see a journalist question those running and not let up until they give an answer??  It will never happen because the media is corporately owned and they have interests which they want to continue to enjoy.  One more thing, no such thing as a ‘liberal media” this is a GOP talking point that they have tried to pound into everyone’s head.

This is exactly why we’re beginning to mock people like you, and we should at every opportunity. There’s no reason to actually ‘debate’ you at all. Your responses are always incoherent and usually end with you mumbling something about Hannity, Fox, Limbaugh, et al.

I’ll be so sorry to see you take your pacifier and go home. I mean, you making such brilliant points about conservatives being “live and let live types” and all. Hilarious.

________________________________
From: Disqus
To: dallas.dunn@prodigy.net
Sent: Sunday, January 1, 2012 3:44 PM
Subject: [mediaite] Re: David Gregory Defends President Obama Against Rick Santorum’s Accusation Of Appeasement

Disqus generic email template

MuddleVanHeck wrote, in response to roger385:
This is exactly why we’re beginning to mock people like you, and we should at every opportunity. There’s no reason to actually ‘debate’ you at all. Your responses are always incoherent and usually end with you mumbling something about Hannity, Fox, Limbaugh, et al.

Link to comment

Oh,roger,roger,how droll you are…clever too.
haven’t been called a moron before,at least not to my face.
probing questions,okay,defending the president against someone of the opposite party who is speaking the truth is not advocacy,its more like ass-kissing,wouldn’t you say?
Don’t take any bets on the new Potus….

Isabel is just upset because she will soon be deported.  Adios Isabel.

What we have just witnessed here is a classical case of psychological projection. Roger has demonstrated that his hostility lies with media hackery, but only because he actually relies on it himself.

What a tool.

Well, here’s your problem, ol’ Eagle Eye. Obama’s approval numbers are going up, unemployment is coming down. Your party was just exposed for what they are: anti-tax ONLY for the wealthy. They could give a crap about the middle class. As for journalist ass-kissing … maybe you should take a look at the PEW study from October that shows Obama — by far — has received the harshest coverage of any candidate running for president.

________________________________
From: Disqus
To: dallas.dunn@prodigy.net
Sent: Sunday, January 1, 2012 3:50 PM
Subject: [mediaite] Re: David Gregory Defends President Obama Against Rick Santorum’s Accusation Of Appeasement

Disqus generic email template

eagle67 wrote, in response to roger385:
Oh,roger,roger,how droll you are…clever too.
haven’t been called a moron before,at least not to my face.
probing questions,okay,defending the president against someone of the opposite party who is speaking the truth is not advocacy,its more like ass-kissing,wouldn’t you say? Don’t take any bets on the new Potus….
Link to comment

See, it isn’t the job of the press in a DEMOCRACY to be impartial. It is the press’ job, in a DEMOCRACY, to INFORM the people of the truth/facts so that the people can make the best decision, via elections, regarding THEIR governance. The notion that the press should be impartial was created so that lies could be told to the American people, about Iraq for instance, and the people telling would never have to worry about the press challenging their lies. This notion of an impartial press allows there to exist a rigged press, like in China and Russia, without having a need for direct control. Impartiality creates the rigged, propaganda press by default. By the insane notion that everyone is entitled to their own set of facts and that spin is equal to truth. This is nuts! And people, like this author, who peddle this rubbish, should be ashamed!

Please. If you have something to say that would challenge anyone with higher than a fourth grade education, please do so. Otherwise, please stop wasting my time.

________________________________
From: Disqus
To: dallas.dunn@prodigy.net
Sent: Sunday, January 1, 2012 3:57 PM
Subject: [mediaite] Re: David Gregory Defends President Obama Against Rick Santorum’s Accusation Of Appeasement

Disqus generic email template

MuddleVanHeck wrote, in response to roger385:
What we have just witnessed here is a classical case of psychological projection. Roger has demonstrated that his hostility lies with media hackery, but only because he actually relies on it himself.
What a tool.
Link to comment

You’re ignorant and probably a FOX viewer so I guess you get a pass for being mis-informed.

ROTFLMAO!!

Roger, you’d believe absolutely anything, wouldn’t you! Hey, ask your icon, David Gregory, why he hasn’t covered this president’s involvement with Operation Fast and Furious. Better yet, where’s Gregory’s breaking piece on Solyndra and Obama’s bundlers? What about Light Squared?

This president stinks to high heaven, and the David Gregorys who carry his water will be criticized accordingly.

Are you aware of “Operation Wide Receiver”? I mean you must be, right? Because the Bush administration’s gun running in Mexico program drew so much scrutiny, right? Look at the PEW research I cited early and tell me Obama doesn’t get tough coverage. No, seriously. Yes, I know that facts have a way of geting in the way of the conservative narrative, but check it out.

________________________________
From: Disqus
To: dallas.dunn@prodigy.net
Sent: Sunday, January 1, 2012 4:15 PM
Subject: [mediaite] Re: David Gregory Defends President Obama Against Rick Santorum’s Accusation Of Appeasement

Disqus generic email template

MuddleVanHeck wrote, in response to roger385:
ROTFLMAO!!

Roger, you’d believe absolutely anything, wouldn’t you! Hey, ask your icon, David Gregory, why he hasn’t covered this president’s involvement with Operation Fast and Furious. Better yet, where’s Gregory’s breaking piece on Solyndra and Obama’s bundlers? What about Light Squared?
This president stinks to high heaven, and the David Gregorys who carry his water will be criticized accordingly. Link to comment

Really? You credit Obama for that?  

It’s far more likely that he didn’t want to be democrat #2 that let him get away.

Like you wrong-wingers have some abundance of intelligence in your corner?
Get real. The only reason that you have any power at all, is that you harnessed the power of as many morons as you could, by telling them what they, and you, want to hear.
If the shoe fits, wear it.
You people disdain intellectuals and intelligence, and revel in ignorance and stupidity.
Except for the operators at the top, who are using the rest of you to serve their purposes.

You have all strayed from the basic issue, Rick Santorum is an asshole. That’s why we voted him out. He wants a government that operates based on his religous views in spite of the fact that his personal views conflict with his church’s teaching (death penalty). This “small government” conservative sought to inject the government in a family’s medical decision (Terry Schiavo).
Talks a lot of nonsense re: defense policy but can’t point out a single thing he’d do differently if he were President. You idiots defend him.

We weren’t fooled last time, which is why Sarah Palin’s chances THIS time, are in the toilet, where they, and she, belongs.

Obama had three advantages when he ran for the Democrat nomination and the presidency in 2007/2008. 

He is half African-American, and therefore, his candidacy and election was historic. In this election, while he will receive 85-95 % of African-American votes, his candidacy is no longer a novelty and his administration, especially Eric Holder, have played “the race card” until it no longer holds the power that it did when they accused Bill Clinton of being “racist” in 2007.

Obama had no record (or records) in 2007. Now he does and it’s not pretty.

The “mainstream media” abandoned the Clintons and covered up for any flaw in Obama in 2007/2008. They have exposed themselves as dishonest brokers of the “news” and most of the public does not trust the media to report fairly or accurately. Thus, it is no surprise to see David Gregory or any other talking head from the alphabet media propagandize on behalf of Obama.

The election will hinge upon David Axelrod’s ability to destroy Obama’s opposition. Take a look at Axelrod’s record- it’s pretty disgusting. He makes the late Lee Atwater look like a choir boy. I hope Mr. Axelrod remembers that, at some point, he will have to “defend his life” and that “what goes around, comes around.” I feel absolutely no compassion for this man, no matter how challenging his personal story. He is an evil force in the political process. 

If overthrowing a dictator, after almost 40 years, isn’t democracy, what is it? A commie plot?
How it winds up is another story, but the people are still demonstrating against the military regime, and dying in the process.

Rick Santorum got a hiding by David Gregory. 

How can Rick Santorum support pro-democracy groups in Iran but not in Egypt? Has he not been following the news this past 12 months. 

Its the military of Egypt that is trying to suppress democracy in Egypt, not the Muslim Brotherhood.

Thank goodness, Rick Santorum is not going to win the nomination :)

And he wants to send the American military to fight in Iran. Yet out of the hundreds of thousands of americas military people and veterans, Rick Santorum got the least donation for his combination from the military than any other presidential candidate. A pathetic $250.

The whole point of these Sunday shows is to subject the interviewees to tough questions. You’re just upset that he didn’t toss him softballs, and help your lunatic with a leg up.

Which of these assholes can win in November? The only one who has a chance is the one that you slobs have been trying to beat, and threatening to boycott, or run a 3rd party candidate against.

That moronic response pretty much proves the point.
How does that refute anything? Undoubtedly, it’s the conservaslobs who are dragging the average down.

Do you lefties never stop projecting?  Honestly, give it up.

Sure, right – yup, thats it.  uh huh.  Those tough questions that david and his liberal pals throw at all democrats (can I get you a pillow?  what is your favorite colour, etc.).  Yup, that is it – you are spot on.  Even leftiesare alarmed at david’s defending POTUS, it is not his job to advocate for one party or the other, it’s just that the national barak channel anchors can’t help themselves.

“…someone of the opposite party who is speaking the truth..”

Try not to confuse the truth with what you say it is.
And try not to think that your saying that it’s the truth, will convince anyone but the already convinced.

Bush wasn’t a D.

No, it’s his job to boost repulsivans.

“Even leftiesare alarmed at david’s defending POTUS,..”
Really? Maybe you could cite an example or two, while you take a break from running off at the mouth.

Unless I’m mistaken, I don’t think Meet The Press is supposed to be a partisan, opinion-injected news program. 

I would expect agenda-driven questioning like this from a show like Hardball or Hannity, but not Meet The Press. Just my opinion.

Clinton was. ;-)

Santorum’s foreign policy stance is a frothy mix of neocon mumble jumble and opposing anything Obama supports.  It has as much substance as a bowl of santorum and smells as bad too.

Someone like you posts about ignorance and stupidity when with pretty much every liberal post proves their ignorance and stupidity. I guess we are suppose to get in line and listen to “intelectuals” who make their money by people blindly following their spoutings (Al Gore and other “intelectuals”). Libs get their talking points from their idols and spout it and then shout about how dumb us backwoods, backwards conservatives are, what a joke.

Can you libs not understand that pretty much every intelligence agency around the world said they had nukes and W.M.D.s? It wasnt just Cheney/Bush. You dont have enough critical thinking to realize they had plenty enough time to hide them. He used some on his own people so he showed he had them. Oh,but wait,i guess he used them all on them so he wouldnt have them anymore. Wow i just came to understand how smart sadam was.

Hmmmm,,,was that maybe because the msm attacked her so much. Think maybe if they attacked obama that much the same would happen to him?

What lie did gregory bring out?

Did you not read the story? There isnt gonna be any democracy, the muslim brotherhood (who the obama administration supports) will never let there be any democracy.

Leftys live in their own world of make believe. They throw out childish name calling like “ape poopy” if you dont agree with them.

Post those polls please.

If  liberal has a double digit IQ no right winger breaks out of single digit.

By the way,obama voted to start aggresive actions against iraq while he was in congress.

If the number of people looking for jobs were the same as in 2008 the unemployment number would be right at 11% but because of some juggling by the o administration there are several million less people looking. That number doesnt reflect that all those people found jobs, they just somehow dissapeared. They got tired of looking because they found it useless during the obama years apparently.

try to deceive the decievable to convince the convincible that the remarkable isnt too remarkable when you cant befuddle the befuddlable

Dear God, can the wing nuts not send one person after me with an actual, you know, functioning brain? They calculate the unemployment numbers now with the exact same formula that they did under GWB and GHWB and Saint Ronnie. Get it? Do you not think your attack dogs in the House would have launched an all-out investigation if the Obama administration was cooking the books. Buy a clue, since you don’t seem to possess one.

________________________________
From: Disqus
To: dallas.dunn@prodigy.net
Sent: Sunday, January 1, 2012 8:04 PM
Subject: [mediaite] Re: David Gregory Defends President Obama Against Rick Santorum’s Accusation Of Appeasement

Disqus generic email template

libs_are_clueless wrote, in response to roger385:
If the number of people looking for jobs were the same as in 2008 the unemployment number would be right at 11% but because of some juggling by the o administration there are several million less people looking. That number doesnt reflect that all those people found jobs, they just somehow dissapeared. They got tired of looking because they found it useless during the obama years apparently. Link to comment

You need to look up your facts before you post. He opposed letting companies like haliburton (who all you libs hate because of cheney ties) do backdoor business in iran. He also says that iran is a big contributor to terrorism but he opposes military action there.

Anyone with much sense apposes pretty much anything obama supports.

but you are by and large dumb, backwards and backwoods. 

crawl bag under your trailer stupid bagger.

I wonder why Gregory never bothered to ask if the current Iran policy, irrespective of provenance, is actually, you know, working? Probably because that’s precisely the question his Obama-is-the-same-as-Bush tactic was employed to deflect. Bush is not an option, even if his Iran policy was exactly the same as Obama’s as Gregory would have us believe, so the choice is not between Obama or Bush policy, but between the policies of Obama and some other candidate. Gregory knows this, and he knows that the policies of his dreamboat Obama have been abysmal, so he sets up the (incorrect) strawman of Obama = Bush on Iran. The most embarrassing part is that Gregory is so ham handed and obvious that he leaves himself no room to claim even “devil’s advocate” in the clumsy exchange, and it’s clear that he hardly cares. So long as the focus of discussion is somewhere other than Obama, Gregory (like his employer, NBC News) couldn’t care less about something as insignificant journalistic integrity.

Now, THIS is really racist:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=as2Z5K-eN4s

My god can you lefties not for a minute use your brain, if it does function? You can use the same formula but use different numbers to make it look better genius. So with your thinking either the population has reduced tremendously or there are so many people on welfare not wanting to get off of it that we dont have a problem anymore. If these numbers had been used by bush his unemployment rate would have been 2-3%  so i guess there was no recession under him.You really need to check your ego because noone is being sent after you,,your not that important. And if your so smart why is it you have to re-post everyones post so it takes up so much space? Most of us can see who you are responding to and read their posts.

True lib,,dont debate ,show ignorance by your liberal compassion.

Wow,,why is everything racist? Did you even watch and listen to it? What he was saying was that black people fought to be considered people during the civil right marches. Thats why there is such a problem with race issues, white people cant discuss racial issues.

Why is it that when a “tea” loon candidate makes a  moronic statement or gaffe, the adults have to suffer through the hypocrisy of the “teas” crying “That’s not what they said”,…. “They didn’t mean that”,….. “They weren’t wrong” (the whole time the tape says different) then when Obama makes a general generic diplomatic statement (not a love letter, such as a “tea” liar would have you believe) every hate filled lying crack pot floats to the top of the bowl.

How does watching the clown show of the “tea” hates mean you have an idol. The “tea” jokes are going to lose the election for normal adult conservatives with half a brain!

The vomit of Obama’s appeasement or laying down which have never happened!

You don’t see a journolist crossing the line from reporting to advocacy? So then, the next time Gregory talks to Obama, do you think Gregory will be asking him the “tough questions” based on GOP “talking points”? Just to be challenging, remember.

Calling out a lie is not an agenda!

Hopeful bag thinking!

He nailed him. Gregory was on point!

Facts mean “defend” to a “tea”!

This is all the fallout from 2007. If you recall, Bush’s sanctions regime was destroying the Iranian government… gas lines in the streets, riots, an impending election… then you libs had to fabricate a 2007 NIE that essentially said, “Iran is no threat”. And remember what a collective sigh of relief you all had that Big Bad Bush was put in his place and all those Dreaded Neocons weren’t allowed to do to Iran what they did to Iraq? And the entire sanctions regime collapsed, and all our European consenus on the matter evaporated. It turns out later that – oops – the NIE was a lie, and Germany’s Intel Ops had to even testify to that in a german court. So we lost our last, best chance to end this relatively peacefully just to appease the far Left who hated George Bush and wanted his head no matter what the price. And in this case, the price may very well be the Second Holocaust. Since then, Obama passed up two moments the intervene: 2008 and 2010. It’s the appeasement of the Left in general and Obama specifically that lead us to this point precisely where there “are no good options”.

I’ve read 5 posts from you tonight and all of them have mentioned oral sex and / or masturbation. I’m thinking you belong on a different web site….

Santorum is another GOP moron, played here by Andy Kaufmann. And he’s not going to win crap.

 Then why did Team Bush lie?

 The FOX/AM radio tools that comprise the majority of Republicans are the biggest victims on the planet — they scream for Obama’s birth certificate then whine that the media asks mean ol’ questions to the folks who accuse this president of treason.

The GOP is loathsome, led by that racist junkie, Rush Limbaugh.

…and Gregory is just an apologist for an even bigger moron.You can’t pretend that was anything even approaching serous journo-lism.

Pivotal was actually the Katie Couric interview (CBS Evening News) with the “gotcha” question: “And when it comes to establishing your world view, I was curious, what newspapers and magazines did you regularly read before you were tapped for this — to stay informed and to understand the world?”

What are you babbling about?

You and the truth are strangers. 

That is what we were waiting for– the typical liberal response. Thanks for stopping by.

Everything Santorum said was true. Everything. Gregory was unable to refute any of it, except to argue that Bush did it, too.Then, Gregory changed the subject, saying “I asked you about…”

Listen to it again, fools. Then come back and point out the lies you claim. Then come back and point out exactly what the buttlicker Gregory said that refuted anything that Santorum said– there was nothing except the usual “Bush did it, too.”

When he had no facts, Gregory changed the subject. When he had nothing to refute Santorum, Gregory said “Bush did it, too.”

Yet we have dishonest liberals (redundant, I know) who refuse to see the truth, but post here as if they have a special relationship with the truth. It is disgusting that decent, honest people are always defending themselves from lies put forth by the liberals. Truth and facts mean nothing to liberals– it is all about getting what they want at any costs to the rest of us.

It isn’t democracy. Just because a dictator gets overthrown and there is something resembling elections does not mean that it really was a fair election. The Muslim Brotherhood was the only party that could have won. There was never enough time for any other movement to get up and running. The MB has been well organized for a very long time. You are too ignorant to be commenting on this.

Santorum should be thankful someone is actually taking him seriously.

I don’t get the fuss.

I stopped watching Gregory a long time ago NOT because he is partisan, per se, but because he leans to the right on pro-rich tax policy and thinks the Paul Ryan plan is courageous.

Just listening to Santorum babbling about the Holy War he wants to start in Iran just puts me to sleep.

That is not tough questioning– it is an anchor arguing his own political viewpoint and bias, without regard for facts. get a clue.

You do not know what Operation Wide receiver was. You need to go get some facts in order to know the difference. There is no comparison by any objective measure. None. 

Wow. You really are clueless. They are not using the same standards as Bush or Reagan or anybody else. Do you know anything? No other president ever had millions of people just not counted like this.It did not happen before. The unemployed did not get jobs, but you are pretending they did.

Your asinine argument that the “rules” were the same is not the same as the truth of the situation. We are not talking about “rules” here. We are talking about the truth. The truth is a stranger to you.. 

You do not know what democracy is. Just because a country has a “vote” does not mean it has embraced democracy. A vote is not democracy. Democracy is not the same as voting.

It does matter if the candidates are chosen by certain powerful interests or by the people. It does matter if other groups are given time to form a political party that might have a chance instead of one that gets run over by the powerful interests.

Before you run off at the mouth about democracy, you need to understand what it is– and what it is not. Nothing that went on in Egypt was about democracy. It was a sham. Get some knowledge.

 The fact that you think a corporate stooge like Gregory is a liberal is more evidence of how deluded Republicans are. Santorum is a classic GOP know-nothing clod. Look at that simpering smile. As if America will elect this Glee Club Creep.

 So Obama did what Clinton could not: Health Care; DADT; and the end of Bin Laden Gaddafi. And this who;e “Obama Must Destroy The Competition” meme: the GOP has destroyed itself by placing fools like Trump and Cain in top polling positions.

Amazing how the GOP have become Terrorist Apologists now that Democratic president is in the house – doing what Bush could not.

 ”Everything” – there’s the absolute FOX/AM radio worldview in a nutshell. And I do mean “nutshell.” Maybe Santorum should announce what kind of jail should hold those raped women who choose to not carry that seed.

Santorum is a dishonest creep. And let’s see if he wants a WAR TAX to start another? See how quick his traitorous hide runs to protect his corporate gods.

Fool, we are talking about Gregory’s defense of Obama. If there was something Santorum said that was not true, state it. Otherwise, shut up.

You are a simpleton. You do not even know what you are saying. Do you know anything about the political situation in Egypt? I didn’t think so.

Enlighten me oh great sage. I await your wisdom. You have explained what it is not. Now pray tell me what it is.

 Where’s your birth certificate?

 That’s not Obama’s fault. But it is Bush’s fault for torturing people in the name of freedom.

David Gregory has lovely ‘Leftist’ hair like John Edwards and John Kerry. In fact, his name really should be ‘John.’

Talk about hypocrisy and lies…you certainly have no qualms about using the.

Then why didn’t they wait before giving their approval?  Why didn’t they admit what most of us knew…the Muslim Brotherhood had no intention of allowing anyone but themselves to take over in Egypt?

You are so right.  Any pretense of unbiased reporting or interviewing was totally exposed with this interview by David Gregory…an Obama apologist.  We always knew it, and now Gregory confirmed it.

Actually we do have an abundance of intelligence and we are disdainful of Harvard intellectual eiites who PRETEND they stand for free speech while doing everything they can to squelch it.  They are no smarter than the gutter snipes with megaphones in Zicotti Park.

Read and learn what those so-called intellectuals are really like.

http://bostonglobe.com/metro/2012/01/02/pushed-out-harvard-professor-returns-fire/t1MYsAhTM3JCJ7SZ96paXL/story.html

You are so right.  And the dumb fools like John Doe, below, think they are the smart ones.  You’ve got to laugh at them, the poor ignorant dummies.

Why don’t you enlighten us about the “Cheney lies”?   What, you can’t?  Of course you can’t because there were no “Cheney lies”, nor Bush lies.  Just a lot of actual lies from Pelosi and friends standing on the Capitol steps crying foul when their fellow Democrats agreed with Bush and the Intelligence agencies they got their information from.

You are correct, and it was not when run by Russert.  He had facts and confronted people with their own words, but tried his best not to be partisan even though he was a Democrat.  He earned the respect of many on the right for that reason.

What lie?  Santorum was correct and there are Congressional records to prove it.  Can’t say the same for Gregory.  If Gregory had done his homework as Russert would have done, he would not look the partisan tool for Obama that he looks today.

Big mistake made by Gregory yesterday.

They really know it, but hate to admit it because it does not fit the DNC lies and attacks made against Bush/Cheney.  They would prefer to believe the talking points rather than the facts.

You are funny…you fall right into the hands of us Conservatives with your intellectually empty remarks.  LOL!!!!!

Substitute Iraq for Sudentenland and Saudi Arabia for Poland.  When Assad falls in Syria, and he will, Iran and Hezbolla will be right there to take over.

Go back and read it again.  Gregory didn’t move a hair on Santorum’s head.  Santorum came back at him with verifiable facts and shook up Gregory to the point where he had no retort.

You just described yourself..to a “tea”.

What lies?  Tell us…show us.  Can you?

preminger68; now let me guess your user name means you are one of the protesters in the 1968 Chicago Democratic Convention that helped give Richard Nixon the election. Much like the OWS morons will help defeat the greatest moron ever to OWH. Are you still smoking the weedddd from the sixties lefty?

Santorum as a presidential candidate is mediocre in a field of mediocrity that is the GOP field.

Read or don’t post.

No point of reference. What was a lie?

Correct the lie!

There was no record that stated the same! If you wish to change, spin, and add a few words here and there,… ok!

Gregory corrected your zealot! Obama has not shown appeasement at all, there were no verifiable facts to that charge. Just an unproven opinion “teas” try to cling to when the clowns are put in their place!

Spin and opinion are not facts!

Your vomit is based on “opinion”! Check the facts, Santorum had to spin this like a record, but that doesn’t matter to you, “lies” are good enough!

I dont rely on any particular news or website to get my news. Unlike libs i actually read, watch and use my head to get my news and come to realistic conclusions. Why is it that you have to ask why i was “tapped”, am i not like everyone else on here stating my opinion?

Wait a few years and i can come up with one.

Racist Rush Limbaugh. Have you ever listened to him or do you just get your opinion by how his haters give you what he says?

I have asked every single European and Indian person I have met since Obama took office, how their country feels about President Obama.  Unanimously, I have heard the same three observations: they hated and had no respect for Bush, they all love President Obama, and they are all so bewildered how anybody in this country can hate Obama so much.  I’m a computer person so I meet a lot of people from India and I work for a company who is headquartered in Germany so I get to meet a lot of Europeans from the various different countries.  In addition, they think the teabaggers are a bunch of idiots manipulated by the wealthy, the Koch brothers and they hate them all.

GRBSPR:  That was a really inane comment which added absolutely nothing to the conversation.  Idiot…..

Which one of you clutch-at-straws Cons made up the fake John Doe profile?

BS

‘…pretty much every liberal post proves their ignorance and stupidity. ‘

Clearly, you’re not only stupid, but crazy, as well, if you think that conservaslobs prevail with their lame posts on this site. They get dumped on so consistently that you’d think they were auditioning for the role of a toilet bowl.

As proof of that, all you said here was a rewrite of what I said, a slightly altered version of the Pee Wee Herman favorite, “I know you are, but what am I?”

We get our talking points from our own minds, an asset you people clearly lack. Which explains your resentment of your intellectual betters. And your pathetic slate of candidates.

Of course not. Unlike Obama, Palin was a target-rich environment. Her stupidity was on full display, and the press was doing its job in exposing it for all to see. Mostly by quoting her own words or showing her speeches. The fact that she impresssed you with her intelligence, and that Obama didn’t, says far more about you than anyone else. And pretty much disqualifies you from commenting on the intelligence of others.

“…we do have an abundance of intelligence…”
You do?
Any idea when we’ll be seeing it?
Or was Rick Perry’s debate performance your finest hour?

As for “..the gutter snipes with megaphones in Zicotti Park.”
They’re undoubtedly smarter than you are, to a person.
You’re talking about college grads, saddled with ridiculous debt, who can’t find jobs because of Wall St run amok, with no accountability. No wonder they’re protesting.
Your approval of them is so unnecessary.

Really?? Because it seems your comments and even your screen name make you seem like a typical  ignorant, narrowminded talk radio drone

Did you not read my post? I said,”How it winds up is another story..”
But the fact that we don’t like the result of an election doesn’t mean that it isn’t democracy.
Your statement,”. the muslim brotherhood (who the obama administration supports)..” is a complete lie. Right on schedule. The administration said that they would support the results of a free election, even if they win. That’s not the same as supporting them, and you either know it, or should know it. Nor, is it a foregone conclusion that they will win. But what was the alternative, suporting a 40 year dictator against the people he was oppressing? Right. You have great instincts for foreign policy.

It seems like most of these cons are still stuck in 1938. How is Obama appeasing anyone? Even W signed on to the two state solution. The Palestinians and the rest of the Arab world are not poised to over run Israel. So sad that most the dittoheads here still live in some time warp.

The fact that they have to switch topics means they have nothing to say. Anyone who doesn’t sound like Hannity is “part of the Obama media” to a dittohead.

You have such a grasp on history and current events.

“…and there is something resembling elections does not mean that it really was a fair election.”

Are you for real? You’re questioning the legitimacy of elections that haven’t happened yet? Nor even been scheduled. Because you don’t like what you project as the outcome? Because it’s unfair for one group to be better organized than their adversaries?
And YOU, a proven asshole, are calling ME ignorant.
You’re too stupid to be in the company of people of intellect.

So basically this fascist greaseball is threatening to murder any scientist who even visits Iran. Even Ron Paul makes more sense than this mafioso hypocrite.

Chicago?  Oh please, I lived in Pittsburgh too, Ricky is a dreamer.

Sniff that oba’mao’ jock gregory, you liberal shoe shine boy

Your comment’s lack of wit does justice to your screen name

Dittohead Reality Check Time:
If you go around the world, especially to Islamic countries like Iran. they think Obama is maybe a hair better than Bush but still consider him a Zionist pawn, same with the Ron Paul contingent here. So hearing this slimeball babble a bunch of nonsense about how Obama is appeasing (whom) is laughable. Obama is a slight bit more accommodating than Bush. After all half these lunkheads’s immediate response to any situation in the Arab/Muslim world is to send in troops, spend money, drop bombs(all done with someone else paying for, risking and suffering of course) and attack any possible threat to our status quo.

LOL!!…you lefties are a hoot!  But what can one expect for someone with an IQ of 60.

You are funny, timmy…you continue to defend the indefensible.

They cant even read a post and have a clue as in who the subject is of a comment. The cajun above is soincapable he couldnt even decipher that al gore was the subject of their idolation i was talking about. So funny,,and then talk about intellect. Steve thinks just because he mentions intellect noone else can talka bout it,,it belongs to the libs then. I was giving you an example of your intellectual leaders to show just how “intelectual” you are. Too bad you cant read and understand debate.

There you go cajun, show that you cant read or listen. obama spokesmen ,who usually say what they are told and if not need fired, are who has said that he is backing the muslim brotherhood and other muslim zealots. All you have to be able to do is read and understand.

And if you have never heard the mistake prone and misinformed speeches that obama has made you wouldnt know about him either. Wait i bet you havent because you actually have to listen to conservative news to hear them. Just imagine how much we would all know about him if they actually went after him. But your right, i shouldnt speak of intelligence because it pretty much shows up when people dont know or better yet care to know.

But facts that you wont listen to doesnt mean that it is opinion.

Translated,…. I can’t give him an example of appeasement, sooo I’ll act like he’s wrong!   Thank you!

He didnt spin anything,you like other libs will not listen to truth, you have to deny it and call it spin no matter how much proof you are shown. Actually read what obama and his people say. You will have to actually go somewhere besides msm and msnbc though.

This is why i decided on my name, because yall are clueless. All you have to do is read and watch something besides lib stuff and actually be open minded and you will see that he does support them. I have already said it but his people have said he supported them. His spokespeople are there to talk for him. They either are saying what he tells them to or they should be fired. If they arent listening to him and giving their own opinions then i am sorry for posting what i have read and heard them say, but i only talk about things i have heard and read that were directly said by HIS people.

Clueless, how many nonmuslim parties are in that country? What  % of population is muslim? How many other choices would there have been, that he could have controlled? I guess bigots don’t know that most muslims avoid violence. “All you have to do is read and understand”,…. show me where his spokesmen (fired) said the word     “zealot”    ! You won’t because it’s a lie. This is your spin, your vomit, opinion (not facts) on something “not” true. Your hate is blinding you!

No, overthrowing a dictator isnt democracy,its called overthrowing a dictator. Democracy is then having free, fair elections. Early results have shown that there will be no democracy.

Sorry i said pretty much what you said,,i replied before i read yours.

What facts, you keep saying that but don’t support it! Show an example or just move on.

No, I didn’t hear Obama’s misinforned speeches. Nor did you quote any. But I did hear Palin’s moronic pronouncements. So just to be clear, are you asserting that palin is more intelligent than Obama?
That was my point which you avoided addressing.

Very fancy.
But it doesn’t change the fact that just because you say something is true, that doesn’t mean that it is,
Or anything else.

You get a clue.
Sanitorium is an extreme candidate whose positions demand clarification. It’s one thing to disagree, quite another to call it appeasement. So he got called on it. So what? I guess you’re afraid that your candidate will melt under the heat of intense scrutiny. Too bad.
This is someone who opposes birth control.

So? Then that’s their problem. Wtf am I supposed to do?
Seriously, dude. get a grip. You’re really starting to lose it. And I use the term ‘starting’, charitably.

Why any serious Republican candidate bothers with the likes of David Gregory is beyond me. You cant argue facts with a liberal- its like trying to teach a pig how to dance. Pigs cant dance. You just get covered in mud, by a pissed off pig.

Sorry i have to spell it out for you cajun. I thought maybe with a little thinking you could come to realize that we are all talking about the muslim brotherhood here, a proven RADICAL  muslim organization. Also understood to be “zealots”. There you go showing your true colors again, everytime conservatives talk about someone other than a white person they are instantly bigots. I know you and your ilk dont want to say what is the truth, radical muslims exist and want to destroy US. I dont keep a list of every time i read where things are said because i do it a lot. I just remember it kinda like you  remember all you do. Do you have documentation for all you say on here or do you just remember a lot of it? It sure is funny how everything we believe in is “spin” but all you believe is the truth. Its like that because it makes libs arguments easier to bring out your chosen words. RESPONCE TO CAJUN BELOW.

Yep,,Palin is more intelligent than obama. And as i said you only listen to news that wont show you his miscues. I did see hers,it was easy to,,she was pretty much on display for all to see, unlike your obama that was never shown. Lets see,,he said there was 57 states, said it was marine (c)orpsmen.He thinks austrian is a language, says “uh” constantly (conservatives get ripped for pauses),said “my muslim faith” which wouldnt be bad except he claims to be christian,said there was 10,000 dead in tornado in kansas,said he was in texas when he was in kansas (I think it was that way around,,cant exactly remember the details) which again wouldnt be so bad if it werent for a repub candidate would get ripped for the same thing. There are several more but thats just off the top of my head.

Do you watch fox yoda? They can show you facts, show you details,show you video and its still spin to people like you.

Lol..funny coming from you. I didnt say you were suppose to do anything did i? What did i say that was losing my grip? Do you actually think that overthrowing a dictator is democracy? ,,,really???? Or was it when i just said what has been reported by everyone from cbs to fox to newsweek to rush limbaugh to chris matthews, early signs are that the muslim brotherhood is taking control.

True, but you can then shoot that pig and have some good sausage.

I watch “Faux” News. The question is, do you watch FOX NEWS??  They don’t deal with Facts on that network. Have you heard of Politifact?   It would take you all night to count the lies they spew out on a dailyy basis.

Okay, you done it.
Your belief in the intellectual superiority of a backwater college dropout over a Harvard Law Review editor and graduate, says pretty much all that needs be said.
You’ve lost any and every possibility of credibily with that one.

No. You were saying that Obama supported the Muslim Brotherhood, not that they were taking control.
And an overthrow of a dictator by the people is the first step toward creating and establishing a democracy.
Wtf else?

And the problem is that Mr James Crugnale, the *wink wink*, the “reporter” who wrote this piece, NEVER at any time asks himself exactly what was David Gregory doing  DEFENDING  the President! So pervasive is the bias that it goes unnoticed, like values at a Democrat convention!

Please look at some random youtube videos of Palin and Obama – those gaffes during campaigning might be good to have a joke with but simply cannot be compared with the ignorance and inanity of Palin – those were not gaffes, it was the display of her ‘Weltanschauung’.

Chew on this idiot:

Overtures to Egypt’s Islamists Reverse Longtime U.S. Policy

(NY Times)
— CAIRO — With the Muslim Brotherhood pulling within reach of an outright majority in Egypt’s new Parliament, the Obama administration has begun to reverse decades of mistrust and hostility as it seeks to forge closer ties with an organization once viewed as irreconcilably opposed to United States interests.

The administration’s overtures — including high-level meetings in recent weeks — constitute a historic shift in a foreign policy held by successive American administrations that steadfastly supported the autocratic government of President Hosni Mubarak in part out of concern for the Brotherhood’s Islamist ideology and historic ties to militants.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/04/world/middleeast/us-reverses-policy-in-reaching-out-to-muslim-brotherhood.html?pagewanted=2&_r=2

Embracing the Muslim Brotherhood is an Obama administration policy decision, just as overthrowing Mubarak was. This is failed Jimmy Carter foreign policy on steroids.

Why should David sit there and let Rick Santorum lie. He may not believe in birth control, but he sure can lie

hint …he tried to change washington and the color of his skin

I don’t understand your hint.  Please clarify.

Oh go F your ignorant self.

F ing is somthing a dy ke like you knows nothing about; are you getting any wussy lately. you F N ugly dy ke.