I guess those man-made disaster guys get a holiday too.. Joy

How could you and Obama side with Mexico against one of your own states ? Close the border and you will solve a lot of problems , and maybe save California and many other states . Mexican gangs , Mexican drunk drivers and Mexican criminals we don’t need . We have enough of our own . But , just keep lying , Janet , until Obama is thrown out or he throws you out .

Any way the media can blame Sarah Palin?

They protect all 57 states, 364 days a year.

Big Eddie said:
How could you and Obama side with Mexico against one of your own states ? Close the border and you will solve a lot of problems , and maybe save California and many other states . Mexican gangs , Mexican drunk drivers and Mexican criminals we don’t need . We have enough of our own . But , just keep lying , Janet , until Obama is thrown out or he throws you out .

Mexicans are least of our problems right now.

Don’t we have enough problems with Muslim extremists already??

Closing the border is a good idea.. But that won’t solve problems with immigrants coming to our side, because we know how walls always work. Take Berlin wall for example. Yes they tried their best to make it failproof, but people still kept coming to West Berlin. Unless Mexico gets stabilized, immigrant flow won’t stop. Mexican criminals are mostly related to drug trafficking, but not solely. FYI, US is one of the largest Marijuana producer.

The Fact remains that unless the Markup of illicit drugs that are sold in US(that come from or through Mexico) are lowered, either through legalization or through reduction in consumption(through massive drug programs), we won’t be able to reduce the funding for cartels, who with reduced funding, will be forced to ease their death grip on Mexico and its government, who in turn, might be able to slowly start recovering, and start addressing the needs of the people and probably fight the drug cartels( If they can reduce corruptions), and then and ONLY THEN, the flow of Mexicans to our side of the border be reduced. Stopping the flow of Mexicans isn’t just as easy as blocking them.

that’s totally logical…she’s takes 1 day a year off…Christmas…and, remember when Napolitano took last year’s off: http://tinyurl.com/26uoc4p

@PoliticalPAW

SHE takes 1 day a year off

YELLOW ALERT!!

Hide your kids, hide your wives, and hide your husbands.

PoliticalPAW said:
SHE takes 1 day a year off

Nobody should have to work Elvis’ birthday.

OMG what do we do on leap years with 2 unprotected days? We are doomed!

She and the entire Obama admin have been doing an excellent job.

Many arrests, much vigilance.

No attacks.

God bless them and god bless America.

@ Shoot

Um what about Fort Hood? What about the attempted Christmas day attack (which only failed as a result of quick thinking passengers, and faulty bomb equipment)?

No attacks? I think not.

shootfromthehip said:
She and the entire Obama admin have been doing an excellent job. Many arrests, much vigilance. No attacks. God bless them and god bless America.

The only thing they’ve stopped is the economy.

ImNotBlue said:
@ Shoot

Um what about Fort Hood? What about the attempted Christmas day attack (which only failed as a result of quick thinking passengers, and faulty bomb equipment)?

No attacks? I think not.

Are you really going to just blurt out an offensive word like “Christmas” without apologizing? Forgive me for saying that, btw. Merry Christmas.

What about Times Square? What about the Little Rock recruiting office shooting/murder?

Those who would like to consider bomber incompetence proof of the virtue of the federal government really ought to evaluate the wisdom of that attribution. It’s, well…bullshit.

timzank said:

shootfromthehip said:
She and the entire Obama admin have been doing an excellent job. Many arrests, much vigilance. No attacks. God bless them and god bless America.
The only thing they’ve stopped is the economy.

Actually, that would be W. Dead in its tracks. Inherit a booming economy, drive it into a chasm. Amazing to watch. Almost he same effect as a demolition derby.

ImNotBlue said:
@ Shoot Um what about Fort Hood? What about the attempted Christmas day attack (which only failed as a result of quick thinking passengers, and faulty bomb equipment)? No attacks? I think not.

You guys are really irritated that there hasn’t been a successful attack on America under President Obama, as there was under W? Sick. Perverse you are.

I’m symapthetic with Janet. Anyone who speaks in public makes gaffes like this from time-to-time.

Once as a lector, a reading from the Prophept Micah, I announced a reading from the Prophet Formica, and I stutttered that out three times.

In Court, I was arguing an arcane point about the Statute of Frauds, and I said Statue of Frogs.

The Real Rabid Kook said:
Actually, that would be W. Dead in its tracks. Inherit a booming economy, drive it into a chasm. Amazing to watch. Almost he same effect as a demolition derby.

You mean the boom of the Dot Com Bubble bursting, Kook? That’s OK, Bunky, you go ahead and pretend.

Socialist said:
Closing the border is a good idea.. But that won’t solve problems with immigrants coming to our side, because we know how walls always work.

Ever stop to think there have been more than just Hispanics coming across the border?

That said, one estimate is there are some 22 million criminal aliens in the US now. I guess we owe a debt of “graftitude” to the woman who informed us in the spring of this year that our “borders are more secure than they’ve ever been,” meanwhile, there have been 30,100 deaths along the borders this year and, most tragically, one of our Border Patrol was murdered by these cockroaches. To add insult to injury, Jannie refuses to meet with the sheriffs who are responsible for securing our borders, and the -0bama regime takes the side of Mexico against the state of Arizona.

Well, now we’ve got the DREAM Act, a tool designed by the progressives to provide blanket amnesty to the spawn of those cockroaches who snuck across our borders with their welfare sucking broods in tow.

{But, pyrope, you old meanie, they can either go to college or join the military.}

What will you bet that 99.999% will choose college–which will be paid for by US taxpayers.

DAMN IT PEOPLE–WHEN DOES ENOUGH BECOME ENOUGH?

I emigrated to this country from Greece in 1966. I learned the language AND served in the Air Force, and I never begged one penny off anyone while accomplishing this. Criminal aliens are an insult to everyone who has come to this country legally.

The Real Rabid Kook said:
In Court, I was arguing an arcane point about the Statute of Frauds, and I said Statue of Frogs.

I always thought this was just a joke, but I think we’ve discovered the kernel of truth in it.

An attorney, cross-examining the local coroner, queried, “Before you signed the death certificate had you taken the man’s pulse?”

“No,” the coroner replied.

“Well, then, did you listen for a heart beat?”

The coroner answered, “No.”

“Did you check for respiration? Breathing?”, asked the attorney.

Again the coroner replied, “No.”

“Ah,” the attorney said, “So when you signed the death certificate you had not taken any steps to make sure the man was dead, had you?”

The coroner rolled his eyes, and shot back “Counselor, at the time I signed the death certificate the man’s brain was sitting in a jar on my desk. But I can see your point. For all I know he could be out there practicing law somewhere.”

The Real Royal King said:
I’m symapthetic with Janet. Anyone who speaks in public makes gaffes like this from time-to-time. Once as a lector, a reading from the Prophept Micah, I announced a reading from the Prophet Formica, and I stutttered that out three times. In Court, I was arguing an arcane point about the Statute of Frauds, and I said Statue of Frogs.

Plausible… Thats the key here, you have to be plausible… Your failing…

The Real Royal King said:
Actually, that would be W. Dead in its tracks. Inherit a booming economy, drive it into a chasm. Amazing to watch. Almost he same effect as a demolition derby.

Factually, that’s incorrect. The economy wasn’t booming when Pres Bush took over, rather it was declining. The internet boom (which made Clinton’s economic policy look so successful) had burst, and things were on the down slide. However, Bush was able to maintain relatively low unemployment levels until late in his tenure, when the housing bubble burst.

The Real Royal King said:
You guys are really irritated that there hasn’t been a successful attack on America under President Obama, as there was under W? Sick. Perverse you are.

So Fort Hood wasn’t successful? I bet you think that brings a lot of comfort to the dead and their families.

Oh, and how to you define “successful attack?” The Christmas Day Bomber didn’t kill anyone… but he was the impetus behind massive changes in security screenings in the United States and abroad. In case you didn’t know (which you might, but chose to ignore because it doesn’t fit your spin), one of the states goals of AQ is disruption and confusion. As we’ve seen with the debate over the new security procedures, they’ve succeeded.

They take off your birthday Mark, because you’re so darn special!

Hint:

With this administration the magic day is during Ramadan

ImNotBlue said:
@ Shoot

Um what about Fort Hood? What about the attempted Christmas day attack (which only failed as a result of quick thinking passengers, and faulty bomb equipment)?

No attacks? I think not.

You fucking moron.

You used the word ATTEMPTED.

Like I said, NO ATTACKS UNDER OBAMA.

Quite unlike Bush and Cheney who have the blood of 3000 Americans on their hands for their ineptitude and failure to heed warning signs given to them by the FBI and CIA.

Bush took a month long vacation to Texas instead.

The first terrorism meeting on Al Queda didn’t even take place until 9/10/01.

Too late. Bush + Cheny had 9 months to take threats seriously, but they didn’t, because Clinton told both it was important and they brushed Bill’s advice off.

Ft. Hood has nothing to o with terrorism. The guy was a US soldier who snapped.

ImNotBlue said:
@ Shoot

Um what about Fort Hood? What about the attempted Christmas day attack (which only failed as a result of quick thinking passengers, and faulty bomb equipment)?

No attacks? I think not.

So by your metric, which seems to be any crazy brown person who tries to light things on fire in a plane, than Bush had TWO major “attacks” on his watch.

1. 9/11
2, Richard Reid

They need a day of on a regular year and then 2 days off every 4 yrs. Thanks Janet.

Whatever. For all you idiots on here who give her crap, it’s really easy when you’re sitting behind a computer screen rather than in her chair doing the job. I appreciate the job she’s doing for our country, even if I don’t agree with absolutely everything. That’s life.

shootfromthehip said:
Like I said, NO ATTACKS UNDER OBAMA

Fact:
http://hannity.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/06/15/in-case-you-missed-it-armed-mexicans-crossing-border/

U.S. Border Patrol agents were backed down this week by armed men, dressed in what appeared to be Mexican military uniforms and carrying military weapons, who seized a captured dump truck filled with marijuana from the U.S. agents and dragged it across the border into Mexico with a bulldozer.
The border incident occurred Thursday evening when Border Patrol agents attempted to pull over a dump truck on Interstate 10 in Hudspeth County, Texas. The driver fled from the agents, exiting the freeway and driving toward the Rio Grande which runs within 2 miles of the interstate in this portion of West Texas.

The driver abandoned the truck after it became stuck in the river bed, escaping into Mexico.

Agents called for reinforcement from the Texas state troopers and Hudspeth County sheriff and began unloading the haul – estimated to have been nearly 3 tons – when everything changed.

Officers “started to retrieve the bundles when the armed subjects appeared,” said Agent Ramiro Cordero, Border Patrol spokesman.

According to Hudspeth County Chief Deputy Mike Doyal, the dump truck driver returned with armed men, some of whom drove “official looking vehicles with overhead lights.” Some of those armed, Doyal told the El Paso Times, appeared to be Mexican soldiers in uniform with military weapons.

“It’s a very serious incident,” Doyal said. “We are very fortunate … no one got hurt. Everyone had the presence of mind not to cause an international incident, or start shooting.”

U.S.-trained Mexican commandos, called the Zetas, making cross-border runs into U.S. territory in military-style vehicles, armed with automatic weapons.

The Zetas were trained as elite commandos by U.S. forces to combat the drug cartels, but they have switched sides and are working for the drug smugglers in the border area posing a special hazard to American law enforcement and Border Patrol agents, according to a U.S. Justice Department memo. Under the control of reputed drug kingpin Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman, the Zetas are conducting a bloody war for control of the entire southern border in an effort to secure a monopoly on drug-smuggling and people-smuggling routes.

As both sides faced off, a bulldozer appeared from the Mexico side of the river and was used by the armed men to pull the dump truck – and the two-thirds of the marijuana that had not yet been unloaded – into Mexico. The bulldozer, Doyal said, is believed to be used regularly to make makeshift crossings over the Rio Grande.

The “armed encounter with drug smugglers,” as Cordero described it, is under investigation. No confirmation was made as to whether or not the “soldiers” belonged to the Mexican military.

Related stories:

Border sheriff warns: We’re overwhelmed

Mexican drug commandos expand ops in 6 U.S. states

It’s war between cops in Mexico

The threat from Mexico

‘It’s a war’ along Mexican border

Mexican commandos seek control of border Texas law enforcement officers and Border Patrol agents engaged in an armed standoff with Mexican military personnel and drug smugglers just inside the United States along the Rio Grande yesterday afternoon.
According to a report in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin of Ontario, Calif., both Texas law enforcement and the FBI stated nearly 30 American agents were part of the incident

Mexican commandos new threat on border

Just4thefax said:
Fact:
http://hannity.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/06/15/in-case-you-missed-it-armed-mexicans-crossing-border/

U.S. Border Patrol agents were backed down this week by armed men, dressed in what appeared to be Mexican military uniforms and carrying military weapons, who seized a captured dump truck filled with marijuana from the U.S. agents and dragged it across the border into Mexico with a bulldozer.
The border incident occurred Thursday evening when Border Patrol agents attempted to pull over a dump truck on Interstate 10 in Hudspeth County, Texas. The driver fled from the agents, exiting the freeway and driving toward the Rio Grande which runs within 2 miles of the interstate in this portion of West Texas.

The driver abandoned the truck after it became stuck in the river bed, escaping into Mexico.

Agents called for reinforcement from the Texas state troopers and Hudspeth County sheriff and began unloading the haul – estimated to have been nearly 3 tons – when everything changed.

Officers “started to retrieve the bundles when the armed subjects appeared,” said Agent Ramiro Cordero, Border Patrol spokesman.

According to Hudspeth County Chief Deputy Mike Doyal, the dump truck driver returned with armed men, some of whom drove “official looking vehicles with overhead lights.” Some of those armed, Doyal told the El Paso Times, appeared to be Mexican soldiers in uniform with military weapons.

“It’s a very serious incident,” Doyal said. “We are very fortunate … no one got hurt. Everyone had the presence of mind not to cause an international incident, or start shooting.”

U.S.-trained Mexican commandos, called the Zetas, making cross-border runs into U.S. territory in military-style vehicles, armed with automatic weapons.

The Zetas were trained as elite commandos by U.S. forces to combat the drug cartels, but they have switched sides and are working for the drug smugglers in the border area posing a special hazard to American law enforcement and Border Patrol agents, according to a U.S. Justice Department memo. Under the control of reputed drug kingpin Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman, the Zetas are conducting a bloody war for control of the entire southern border in an effort to secure a monopoly on drug-smuggling and people-smuggling routes.

As both sides faced off, a bulldozer appeared from the Mexico side of the river and was used by the armed men to pull the dump truck – and the two-thirds of the marijuana that had not yet been unloaded – into Mexico. The bulldozer, Doyal said, is believed to be used regularly to make makeshift crossings over the Rio Grande.

The “armed encounter with drug smugglers,” as Cordero described it, is under investigation. No confirmation was made as to whether or not the “soldiers” belonged to the Mexican military.

Related stories:

Border sheriff warns: We’re overwhelmed

Mexican drug commandos expand ops in 6 U.S. states

It’s war between cops in Mexico

The threat from Mexico

‘It’s a war’ along Mexican border

Mexican commandos seek control of border Texas law enforcement officers and Border Patrol agents engaged in an armed standoff with Mexican military personnel and drug smugglers just inside the United States along the Rio Grande yesterday afternoon.
According to a report in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin of Ontario, Calif., both Texas law enforcement and the FBI stated nearly 30 American agents were part of the incident

Mexican commandos new threat on border

I knew you can’t write something as long as that. Don’t you feel any shame by copying and quoting such large reference. I would never have finished higher education by doing something like this. Surely you could have summarised it and then referenced it to the source. What is the point of adding a comment (another article) to comment on a short post. This does not make any sense, your useless effort to quote another persons work is actually longer than the original post on mediaite.

What makes you think people want to read such crap (long article). Can’t you see the logic of the work going on around here. They make a lot of their post, because the longer it is, the less interested people would be. You Sir! a a Bore and needs to know how blogs and news sites work.

shootfromthehip said:
Clinton told both it was important and they brushed Bill’s advice off.

Fact: Here is one.
http://www.brookesnews.com/042903ecclewilkinson.html

I just wonder why Sandy Berger steals documents in his socks to cover up for Clinton?
http://neveryetmelted.com/2006/12/22/what-did-sandy-berger-steal/

Mr. Berger knows what transpired on his first two visits, when he reviewed collections of confidential memos, e-mails, and handwritten notes, including materials taken from counter-terrorism adviser Richard Clarke’s office – all of which were not catalogued at the individual item level.

Handwritten notes from Berger, the President, or some other official? Observations that would be embarrassing to them, evidence they missed an important threat or considered or recommended actions – or decisions not to act – they wouldn’t want to defend in public? Evidence, perhaps, that would have supported the Bush Administration?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/01/sandy_berger_what_did_he_take.html

I could paste this stuff here all day. Some people need to get their facts straight!

skyfet said:
What makes you think people want to read such crap

Fact: Most times links are skipped and sometimes people that know how to read will read but some are just lazy about both I see you fit the lazy category!

Just4thefax said:
Fact: Most times links are skipped and sometimes people that know how to read will read but some are just lazy about both I see you fit the lazy category!

Well the Lazy one might be you. If you were not lazy why couldn’t you summarize the darn thing and just add the reference at the end. This is shameful, you can’t get away with this kind of crap in the real world. It’s a disaster.

Fact: I will write it, like the way you write your post just for you and only you!

Clinton Sandy Berger steals. Bush terrorist. safer. all Americans.

skyfet said:
a disaster

Fact: Your a real dumb shit right!

skyfet said:
They need a day of on a regular year and then 2 days off every 4 yrs

Fact: Huh what?

Just4thefax said:
Fact: Huh what?

Let me break it down for ya.
Janet said they keep the American people safe for 364 days a year.
A regular year has 365 days a year.
Every four year it’s 366 days.
So if Janet and her team keeps America safe for 364 days.
That means in a regular year, they have a day off. 365-1=364days
While on a leap year (366 days), Janet and her team take two days off. 366-2=364 days

Hence, They need a day off on a regular year and then 2 days off every 4 yrs

Capiche? ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Classic.

Big Eddie said:
How could you and Obama side with Mexico against one of your own states ? Close the border and you will solve a lot of problems , and maybe save California and many other states . Mexican gangs , Mexican drunk drivers and Mexican criminals we don’t need . We have enough of our own . But , just keep lying , Janet , until Obama is thrown out or he throws you out .

I wish you had advised ‘W’ to follow the same process. The country wouldn’t be in this situation. As usual BO is just following W locksteps and barrel: Iraq and Afghanistan, Tax cuts, wiretaps, Guantanao, Border control, etc. You should be proud, criticising him on this issue shows your hypocrisy in you if you didn’t do the same for the past 10long years. Where have you been??????????????

Just4thefax said:
Fact: Your a real dumb shit right!

A real dumb shit making you look dumber. Thanks for the compliment., this means you complement me in the process of dumbing down the public.

Janet Incompetano was obviously referring to the day that border patrol agent Brian Terry got shot to death by a Mexican drug gang.

Just his misfortune to be working on the one day a year that Homeland Security was off the job.

We have a President who is working against us . He wants Hispanic votes . He won’t close the border , because then Democrats won’t get Hispanic votes . The millions of illegal aliens are choking the life out of this country . Napolitano is following Obama’s orders to let them alone .

skyfet . You may have wound your turban too tight this morning . Calm down and do a rewrap . You’ll feel better . Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh !

Big Eddie said:
We have a President who is working against us . He wants Hispanic votes . He won’t close the border , because then Democrats won’t get Hispanic votes . The millions of illegal aliens are choking the life out of this country . Napolitano is following Obama’s orders to let them alone .

skyfet . You may have wound your turban too tight this morning . Calm down and do a rewrap . You’ll feel better . Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh !

Ahhh avoiding my obvious point, lol. Why are you hiding from the fact that he is doing exactly what ‘W’ did. ah, hard to swallow obvious hypocrisy.

Talking about now .

Drat ! skyfet outsmarts Big Eddie . Must have been an eclipse .

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh !

Big Eddie said:
Talking about now .

Drat ! skyfet outsmarts Big Eddie . Must have been an eclipse .

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh !

Well, our present state is defined by our past. So ignoring the past especially a recent on is just lame. By the way an eclipse was observed on Oakland recently, you must have missed it, just as you missed the past 10yrs. ahhhhhhhh, another classic.

Big Eddie said:
We have a President who is working against us . He wants Hispanic votes . He won’t close the border , because then Democrats won’t get Hispanic votes . The millions of illegal aliens are choking the life out of this country . Napolitano is following Obama’s orders to let them alone . skyfet . You may have wound your turban too tight this morning . Calm down and do a rewrap . You’ll feel better . Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh !

Actually, Eddie, it seems like the only one against us is people like you, who hate the President and hope for our country to go down to justify your hatred. That’s just sick. Not to worry, everyone has the right to be sick if they want.

Yay! Wait. What about the party? I don’t want that kind of surprise party, you know?

We could all be safer if we just take things a little further to the left and incarcerate all newborns into padded cells where we keep them into old age when they die.

valkyrie101 said:
Actually, Eddie, it seems like the only one against us is people like you, who hate the President and hope for our country to go down to justify your hatred.

Acually, valkyrie, it is people like YOU who support a President who has intentionally destroyed all hope of ever resolving our national debt, and a President who uses dictatorial tactics to inflict fascist healthcare against America that forces our “country to go down to justify your hatred.”

Davo said:
We could all be safer if we just take things a little further to the left and incarcerate all newborns into padded cells where we keep them into old age when they die.

Democrats prefer to kill them just before they are born, it’s their favorite.

Davo said:
Acually, valkyrie, it is people like YOU who support a President who has intentionally destroyed all hope of ever resolving our national debt, and a President who uses dictatorial tactics to inflict fascist healthcare against America that forces our “country to go down to justify your hatred.”

Wow, so much hatred in someone’s head and mind is surely going to drive any one over the edge. By the way I wonder where you’ve been for the past 10yrs, when W turned a surplus into deficit, and implemented a Medicare extension that they never paid for. I bet those pass you by. I bet W is a big Fascists, by doing what his cousin BO did. ahhhh.

I, for one, hope that the people who spend their lives protecting our lives know that most Americans appreciate their efforts greatly. This is one whiny nation lately, it’s as though it’s everything has to be snarky and rude rather than respectful and courteous.

I didn’t think you could base an article on a mispoken word, turns out you can. How strange.

Thanks DHS, FBI, etc for your work to keep us safe!

I just hope she’s aware of that bearded border jumper in the funny robes who always invades America this time of year. Doing home invasions on good Americans, bringing suspicious ornately-wrapped packages; this fiend must be stopped!

ImNotBlue said:
@ Shoot Um what about Fort Hood? What about the attempted Christmas day attack (which only failed as a result of quick thinking passengers, and faulty bomb equipment)? No attacks? I think not.

NYC also, but that’s quibbling, besides all those, no attacks.

ImNotBlue said:
They protect all 57 states, 364 days a year.

Government education at it’s best.

Dave Richards said:
Government education at it’s best.

I blame “No child left behind.”.

I’m symapthetic with Janet. Anyone who speaks in public makes gaffes like this from time-to-time.

Editor’s Note: Yes. The King actually said this.

shootfromthehip said:
She and the entire Obama admin have been doing an excellent job.

Many arrests, much vigilance.

No attacks.

God bless them and god bless America.

Are you f&*^king insane!
What about our economic breakdown in California from illegals flooding the hospitals and costing us billions in welfare and social cost. or the billions in taxpayer money for illegals in our prison systems. We are BROKE out here because of the social entitlements this state gives out mainly from illegals.

The Obama administration main sheriff didnt even read the Arizona law which is the exact same as the federal governments one… but throws a law suit at his own people to please illegals.

This administration is the wost enemy to any working American taxpayer in history!

skyfet said:
Let me break it down for ya.

Fact: This fat woman only protects the plate of food she is eating off of! If you get in arms distance that is the only thing she sees! As far as the border goes she eats at Outback SteakHouse and protects her plate there too!

Mike McConnell (aka as Mitch to some) will be teaching our remaining states how to speak Austrian on day 365, so they’ll be able to detect any future, obscurely accented, lily-white terrorist types, like those seen in past Diehard and other PC Hollywood movies.

Meantime, this President will likely be practicing the correct pronunciation of words like fajita (Faheeta) in a WH mirror so he doesn’t F’k That up too, if TOTUS isn’t around. So guh’bye everybody, cus’ I’m late for, if you’ll forgive the expression, a Christmas Party, and Michelle’s still got my nads in a mason jar. But don’t anybody tell her that I already know what kinda gift she got me.

Alright then, take care Billy Jeff

Please GO!

Obfuscation, and outright lies are the mainstay of Napolitano & co. Last week another border patrol agent was murdered by Mexican thugs on the border and this bag of wind keeps telling us, it’s under control? Vast areas of American soil in southern Arizona have signs telling Americans not to enter because Mexican drug gangs are using that portion of the U.S. to move their drugs?…WHAT?!!… This president, and this women have turned their backs on the legal citizens of our border states, and country in favor of appeasing the illegal employer lobbyists. Money talks, and our rights walks!!

CAconservative said:
Obfuscation, and outright lies are the mainstay of Napolitano & co. Last week another border patrol agent was murdered by Mexican thugs on the border and this bag of wind keeps telling us, it’s under control? Vast areas of American soil in southern Arizona have signs telling Americans not to enter because Mexican drug gangs are using that portion of the U.S. to move their drugs?…WHAT?!!… This president, and this women have turned their backs on the legal citizens of our border states, and country in favor of appeasing the illegal employer lobbyists. Money talks, and our rights walks!!

You are really sad.

One border guard gets shot and suddenly it’s all Obama’s fault?

Fuck you.

The shit has been happening for decades.

Got a problem with it?

Go enlist and get your ass on the border, pussy.

shootfromthehip—-
Should rename himself–shotfromhismouthwithout engaging brain!!!!!

And of course–libs can’t carry on a conversation without using foul lanquage and calling people names!!

This is a non issue. This very competent caring woman goes on TV to help inform the american people about homeland security steps to keep us safe and the pundits take simple conversation error and turn it into the main topic of conversation. Did anyone really get the message??

CarmanK said:
This is a non issue. This very competent caring woman goes on TV to help inform the american people about homeland security steps to keep us safe and the pundits take simple conversation error and turn it into the main topic of conversation. Did anyone really get the message??

From the comments being said here, I doubt any of them are old enough to understand the word message.

CarmanK said:
This very competent caring woman goes on TV

…and makes a total ass of herself.

Competent? You’re out of your rabbit-assed mind.

lane said:
Thanks DHS, FBI, etc for your work to keep us safe!

Lane, it’s never been a complaint (with few exceptions) about labor, the complaint is about what is loosely referred to as “management.”

Janet Napolitano:
The Obama administration is working 364 days of every year to protect the American people.

Obama would confirm this with the assertion that this is being done in all in all 57 states.

“Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it.”
~ Barack Hussein Obama

Progressives are the malodorous, masturbatory discharges of mental instability.

Yet a majority of Americans voted this Marxist crapweasel into the White House. Now that the White House is up to its eyeballs in communists, we can confidently say that it’s now the Red House.

There should be a reasonable, minuscule requirement that U.S. voters possess the equivalent intelligence of a head of lettuce.

If this were done, progressives would lose at least half of their voters.

shootfromthehip said:
She and the entire Obama admin have been doing an excellent job. Many arrests, much vigilance. No attacks. God bless them and god bless America.

lmao! Every time shit happens it’s dumbasses like you (and the Prez) who are the first to say it was a rightwing nut job. Yeah, you and teh rest of your deluded ilk are doing a great job.

shootfromthehip said:
The first terrorism meeting on Al Queda didn’t even take place until 9/10/01.
Too late. Bush + Cheny had 9 months to take threats seriously, but they didn’t, because Clinton told both it was important and they brushed Bill’s advice off.

Unbelievable. Clinton had Osama in the crosshairs and didn’t pull the trigger cuz he knew his popularity (after soiling a cartain blue dress) would go further in the crapper….. and YOU wanna talk about how ‘important’ it was to him? Good grief you guys are twisted.

So, Bush gets the blame for 9-11 but Obama gets the credit for the present state of Homeland Security, right? That makes just as much sense as the rest of your BS.

And btw…. I really feel safe with you jokers preventing ‘man-made disasters’ by ‘freedom fighters’ in the Overseas Contingency Operation. lmfao!

Buncha jokers. Sad, pathetic jokers.

FearMonger said:
Unbelievable. Clinton had Osama in the crosshairs and didn’t pull the trigger cuz he knew his popularity (after soiling a cartain blue dress) would go further in the crapper

BINGO!