1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser
Advertisement

Obama Takes On GOP; Angrily Defends ‘Working Stiffs’ Who Struggle Everyday

video
» 485 comments

President Obama took to the White House briefing room podium Friday afternoon to take questions regarding the earlier collapse of the debt crisis negotiations between the administration and the GOP. A rather pedestrian press briefing suddenly turned spirited with last question posed by Huffington Post’s Sam Stein, who asked about market reaction on Monday. Mr. Obama seemed passionate, if not…well, pissed, with Speaker Boehner and other GOP leadership for the stalled talks.

Perhaps most conspicuous in Obama’s response what that Stein’s question provided an opportunity for the president to calm the markets. And while he opened with his confidence that an extension of the debt limit would avoid default, its not exactly like went out of his way to appease potentially skittish investors on Wall Street.

A rough transcript of his comments follows the video embedded below, courtesy of CNN:

I remain confident that we will get an extension of the debt limit and not default. I am confident of that. I am less confident at this point that people are willing to step up to the plate and actually deal with the underlying problem of debt and deficits. That requires tough choices. That’s what we were sent here to do. I mean the debt ceiling… that’s a formality, historically its not even been an issue. Its an unpleasant vote, but its been a routine vote that congress does periodically.

It was raise 18 times when Ronald Reagan was president. Ronald Reagan said ‘default is not an option,’ that it would be hugely damaging to the prestige of the United States and we shouldn’t even consider it. So that’s the easy part – we should have done that six months ago.

The hard part is actually dealing with the underlying debt and deficits. And doing it in a way that’s fair. That’s all the American people are looking for, some fairness. I can’t tell you how many letters and emails I get, including from some Republican voters who say we know that neither party is blameless when it comes to how this debt and deficit developed.

There’s been a lot of blame to spread around, but we sure hope you don’t just balance the budget on the backs of seniors. We sure hope that we aren’t slashing our commitment to make sure that kids can go to college. We sure hope that you aren’t throwing a bunch of poor kids off the medicaid rolls so that can’t get basic preventative services that keep them out of the emergency room. That’s all they are looking for is some fairness.

Now what you are going to hear, I suspect, is well if the senate is prepared to pass the cap cut and balance — the Republican plan — that somehow we could solve this problem that’s serious debt reduction. Turns out that the plan that Speaker Boehner and were talking about was comparable in terms of deficit reduction.

The difference was that we didn’t put all the burden on the people who were least able to protect themselves, who don’t have lobbyists in this town, who don’t lawyers working on the tax code for them. Working stiffs out there, ordinary folks who are struggling everyday. And they know they are getting a raw deal and they are mad at everybody about it. They are mad at Democrats and they are mad at Republicans because they know that somehow no matter how hard they work they don’t be able to seem to keep up. And what they are looking for is somebody who is willing to look out for them. That’s all they are looking for.

And for us to not be keeping those in mind every single day when we are up here. For us to be more worried about what some funder says or what some talk radio show host or what some columnist said, or what pledge back when we were trying to run or worried about having a primary fight…for us to be thinking in those terms? Instead of thinking about those folks is inexcusable!

I mean the American people are just desperate for folks who are willing to put aside politics for just a minute and try and get some stuff done. So when Norah asked, or when somebody else asked “why was i willing to go a long with a deal that wasn’t optimal from my perspective?” Because even if I didn’t think the deal was perfect, at least it would show tat this place was serious. That we are willing to take on these responsibilities even when its tough. That we’re willing to step up even when the folks who got us elected may disagree.

And at some point, if you want to be a leader, you gotta lead.

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • Anonymous

    Too little too late. Primary him.

  • SteveCan

    The
    Speaker’s dilemma … How to answer our petulant little man-child’s
    petty rambling, finger pointing, self aggrandizing Bullshit.

  • South Park Conservatives

    Instead of defending the few working stiffs thats left,Obama should be doing more to help us and increase our numbers.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_VPOX7QKJCIVFGUSF5W2W4Z4LXE esther

    There he goes again, class warfare, thats all he knows, blame it on someone else, he is so mad because he didnt get his way, he must have talked about the jets four times, quit lying obama, tell the truth about how you gave money to the jets in your stimulus, you should’t have done that, what about your own democrats who are using this as yourself for political reasons, really looked bad for our president to come out looking like a spoiled crybaby, and then to summon them back in the morning, this is America not the banana republic, just imagine if President Bush had done this, everyone here and the press and media would have gone ballistic and would have been shouting qustions at Bush, how different his press treats him. Grow up obama

  • Cain

    House Republicans have the debt ceiling bomb strapped on and they’re willing to take collateral damage to prove their point. 

    The Tea Party Republicans in the house have put Boehner in a no win position. The only way he keeps his job is if he can get only what Tea Party House members want. Anything different he will be considered by them as giving in to the President.

  • Anonymous

     It’ll be fun to watch the American people decide how fair the two sides have been.
    The facts will speak for themselves.

  • Cain

    House Tea Party Republicans have the debt ceiling bomb strapped on and they’re willing to take collateral damage to prove their point.

  • Exgoper

    I used to belong to the Republican party, but they’re just not a serious political operation any more. You have to believe the impossible and vote for the unthinkable. 

  • Redleaf

    Wait, is Obama still a Muslim, sleeper terrorist with plans on destroying America?
    Or is he now just a Democrat whose policies you disagree with?

    I’m trying to figure out which narrative to follow.

  • Anonymous

    You sound like Rush (King of the Rednecks) Limbaugh.  Its Boener who spouts tears like a little girlie-boy.

  • Anonymous

    The ‘Real Facts’….will NEVER be seen by the American People…….simply the smoke that both sides will blow!

  • Anonymous

    I love it when the man I voted for shows up!  More please!

  • Nature Freak

    Republicans are more interested in buying 350 dollar bottles of wine (Rep. Paul Ryan) than helping the working class.

    Republicans hate Evolution, but they love social Darwinism.

  • paminwi

    Republicans not serious?  Who passed a budget?  Who passed a debt ceiling bill?  Whose budget director said, when asked if he could score Obama’s plan said ” I don’t score speeches”. Even his own chosen people know he has no plan.

     I don’t want to eat the freaking peas he wants me to eat (I actually like peas, just not his).

    He needs to stop being “present” and put his plan on the table and IN WRITING!  he does not know how to LEAD.  God, November can not come soon enough!

  • Cain

    The anti-tax Taliban ( House Tea Party) is ok with US catching on fire so they can say their fire extinguisher is better. It’s not.

  • Anonymous

    Now what would the Harvard elitist know about “working stiffs”? Answer: Nothing.

  • http://twitter.com/danielmchick Daniel M. Chick

    I’d rather sound correct than horridly petulant, rambling, and self aggrandizing.

  • Anonymous

    Very interesting that when Boehner spoke, he went quite quickly to “Americans I speak to when back in my district,” and then spoke ONLY about business.

    When will the Republic Party take the side of individual Americans? Why does the Republic party love corporatism and hate individualism?

    Why is the Republic Party endorsing a capitalized form of . . . COMMUNISM?????

  • Anonymous

    Talk to Sen John Kerry (D) about his $7,000,000 yacht.

  • Anonymous

    Well, it’s official. The entire US government – Congress and the White House – is just like junior high school.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GVWU6V6ORHYQ57UOHAEI52XTVU Dennis

    I would love to go back through history and look at every president’s briefings and see how many other presidents have referred to the middle class as “working stiffs”. My guess is the number would be zero. What an arrogant ass comment.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NUT75XKRMJZ2QZJUUWOYH7Y7TA Cincy

    Obama is a stupid, lazy, incompetent, petulant little man-child

  • Anonymous

    Well….just throw it all into the ‘Muslim, sleeper cell terrorist, Christian-Chiristian hate Christian church attending, late showing Birth Certificate because he liked the bs, White-hatered, Black-Hatred-do nothing for Blacks, not willing to bend-while bending, liar-to-all liars in Congress, etc’ Narrative to destoy America while everyone else is attempting to rebuild America(Sike)…….that way, it all can be followed at one time….that is, if its possible to follow that??!!!!

  • Anonymous

    Well….just throw it all into the ‘Muslim, sleeper cell terrorist, Christian-Chiristian hate Christian church attending, late showing Birth Certificate because he liked the bs, White-hatered, Black-Hatred-do nothing for Blacks, not willing to bend-while bending, liar-to-all liars in Congress, etc’ Narrative to destoy America while everyone else is attempting to rebuild America(Sike)…….that way, it all can be followed at one time….that is, if its possible to follow that??!!!!

  • Anonymous

    If Obama ever saw a working stiff, it was inside a Chicago brothel.

  • Anonymous

    If Obama ever saw a working stiff, it was inside a Chicago brothel.

  • Anonymous

    Why don’t you just call him Boy.

    You know you want to.

  • Anonymous

    Why don’t you just call him Boy.

    You know you want to.

  • guest

    Forget the GOPers.  Use the 14th Amendment and do whatever you feel like.  Make them spend years in court fighting you.  It is the only way to deal with them.

  • guest

    Forget the GOPers.  Use the 14th Amendment and do whatever you feel like.  Make them spend years in court fighting you.  It is the only way to deal with them.

  • Anonymous

    Great job of fixating on a turn of phrase and missing the susbtance, dummy.

  • Anonymous

    Great job of fixating on a turn of phrase and missing the susbtance, dummy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Amy-Miller/100001695816448 Amy Miller

    Republicans suck!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Amy-Miller/100001695816448 Amy Miller

    Republicans suck!

  • guest

    AAAAHHHH, the voice of experience on brothels!

  • guest

    AAAAHHHH, the voice of experience on brothels!

  • Anonymous

    Obama says one thing and than goes out and charges $38,000 to sing Happy Birthday to him.. WHat do you think he will say to them as they fly in on their private jets?…. Do you think hell say. “You people should pay more taxes and give up your outlandish possessions”?….. Or more likely ” Dont worry about what i say to the American people, they”ll believe what i tell them to believe. “I’ll make sure i take care of you”…………The latter i’m sure

  • Anonymous

    Obama says one thing and than goes out and charges $38,000 to sing Happy Birthday to him.. WHat do you think he will say to them as they fly in on their private jets?…. Do you think hell say. “You people should pay more taxes and give up your outlandish possessions”?….. Or more likely ” Dont worry about what i say to the American people, they”ll believe what i tell them to believe. “I’ll make sure i take care of you”…………The latter i’m sure

  • ceeza

    The “Harvard elitist” who literally came from NO money.. His family had nothing.. He had no money in elementary school.. no money high school, no money in college.. he’s  worked his whole life for everything he’s got.. When you have NO family money as a backup plan I think he’s qualified to know what a “working stiff’ is at the very least..

  • ceeza

    The “Harvard elitist” who literally came from NO money.. His family had nothing.. He had no money in elementary school.. no money high school, no money in college.. he’s  worked his whole life for everything he’s got.. When you have NO family money as a backup plan I think he’s qualified to know what a “working stiff’ is at the very least..

  • guest

    What budget?  It had no details.  Silly!

  • guest

    What budget?  It had no details.  Silly!

  • Nature Freak

    “Obama seemed passionate”
    President Obama needs to be more passionate. He needs to stand up to the troglodyte teabaggers.
    Obama needs to get medieval if necessary.

  • Nature Freak

    “Obama seemed passionate”
    President Obama needs to be more passionate. He needs to stand up to the troglodyte teabaggers.
    Obama needs to get medieval if necessary.

  • guest

    More con “class warfare”!

  • guest

    More con “class warfare”!

  • guest

    Like standing up to GOPers who eliminate government jobs and lower government wages and benefits?

  • Anonymous

    I know I already did the Dwayne Johnson voice in the other thread but Man! I want to do it again.

    Oh I know….HuffPo.    

  • Anonymous

    Really. You think average folks are offended by that and don’t consider themselves to be working stiffs?

    I knew exactly what he meant and I think other working stiffs will too.

  • Paul G

     That he wanted to evades taxes on…

  • Anonymous

    At this point he knows this speech by heart. He might even be able to give it without the teleprompters. He says the same thing every single time he preaches about this. He throws out all his poll tested buzz words like a pro.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NUT75XKRMJZ2QZJUUWOYH7Y7TA Cincy

    Why would I want to do that?

  • Anonymous

    Obama is a sock puppet of the marxists. And not a very good one at that. I’m glad that the Republicans are calling his bluff. I’m really tired of the excrement coming out of this presidents mouth, he’s a slick talker, but says nothing, and I think it’s the first time in his life that people are calling him out for the asshole that he is.

  • Paul G

     I’d go with the first one…….and the second one…

  • Anonymous

    We will leave that to lib racists such as yourself.

  • Anonymous

    Obama warned Cantor he would take his case the American people and he did.

    GOP got bitch-slapped and they will rue this day.

    RUE, I SAY!!

    THERE WILL BE RUEING!!!!

  • Anonymous

    wink wink right?

  • BR

    Ok,…..he’s a boy.  Happy?

  • Anonymous

    Paul Ryan paid for his own wine unlike Nasty Nan Pelosi.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NUT75XKRMJZ2QZJUUWOYH7Y7TA Cincy

    Don’t wink at me weirdo. I like women

  • Exgoper

    Why exactly is it class warfare to propose that those who’ve benefited the most from the lowest tax rates in half a century help their country out through difficult times? Obama didn’t start two obscenely expensive wars and didn’t hand out tax breaks to those who needed them the least. This was W’s doing, not Obama’s. He’s acted responsibly in trying to clean up the mess and for him to be called a class warrior is factual nonsense and downright deranged.

  • Anonymous

    Uh huh, sure you did.

  • Anonymous

    LOL

    Eliminate govt. jobs???

    It was reported yesterday that a govt. worker was much more likely to lose his job due to death than due to being fired or laid-off.

    I guess your talking point has expired and you didn’t know it, union boy!

  • Anonymous

    Lol I love how your name went from AmericaScuks to GOOD GOD AmericaSucks… lulz

  • TXarc

    Enough of these petulant teabagger schoolchildren. Let the adults solve this.

  • Anonymous

    In other words- you are waiting for another NBC/MSNBC poll to determine which position to take.

  • Anonymous

    That should be one of the first things we do. Eliminate government jobs, lower their pay and get rid of the platinum benefits. Government is bloated.

  • Anonymous

    Pres. Obama’s supposed budget plan was so vague, the CBO said they couldn’t score it because they don’t score speeches.  The President has done NOTHING to present anything tangible, the same no-leadership strategy he used on healthcare to pass the blame to democrats in congress.   Now he’s going to complain about the ONE branch that actually submitted and passed a budget.   I’m sure the media will pretend it’s all Boehner’s fault.  Problem is the senate still hasn’t passed a budget.  

    He still is excellent at speeches. Leadership and executing, still none.  Democratics will still love him, indepdents gave up.  He would be able it doesn’t work when unemployemnt is high and spending is out of control.  

  • Kelc

    Just do a google search,plenty of democrats are millionaires. But liberals like to pretend the republicans are the rich ones.

  • Anonymous

    nice poster name.  it fits.  blessings!

  • Anonymous

    What you said is a tautology.

  • Anonymous

    You are proof that Darwin was correct.

  • Anonymous

    sure you do…

  • Anonymous

    That is a lib convention and invention.

    Try again

  • Anonymous

    Republicans passed a bi-partisan bill. What have the Democrats done? Oh yeah, nothing. Exactlty what part don’t you like of the bill that was passed? You don’t want to cut government spending? You don’t want to cap the amount it can spend? You don’t want it to have a balanced budget?

  • Anonymous

    I see your name and so do you- big time, you POS.

  • Ready for slaughter

    This sounds like the NFL lockout…GOD i miss football….will somebody please sign something so we sheepish americans can get on with our obese lives!!!!

  • Anonymous

    Fact: Bush’s fault. Obama is over his head and will
    only be known best for being a community organizer.

  • Anonymous

    No-that would be Barry’s friend In Hawaii!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_VB4SOUKOAWZQWELB534S2DI2PQ realheadline

    Impeach this incompetent Marxist scumbag before he does any more damage.

  • Anonymous

    LOL

    Yeah, let’s bastardize the Constitution because Barry can’t stop spending other peoples’ money.

  • Kelc

    President doesn’t have a plan.The Senate hasn’t pass a budget  in 27- 28 months,no plan there.Yea i guess it must be Bush and that evil tea parties fault.

  • Anonymous

    The republicans only have a majority in the house. Passing a bill in the house doesn’t accomplish anything when they know it cannot get through the senate. So there Paul Ryan Budget which called for a complete overhaul of medicare, doesn’t mean anything. The Cut, gap, and pap bill means nothing, because a bill passing in the house doesn’t mean anything. They keep saying we passed a bill, but that is easy to do when you have a majority. You did not however get a bill passed in both houses and present it to the president. The tea baggers are simply unaware of how laws and legisdlation is done. You cannot get everything that you want when you only control one house. They have to learn how to govern, not just speak off the top of their heads.

  • Anonymous

    You are talking about that bitter child who wants more money to spend because he has spent it all?

  • Anonymous

    Fact: I still would rather not add to debt ceiling at any account but if spending cuts well out size the extra debt then little is better than none. Tea Party is correct on this issue and in 2012 we can return to sanity.

  • SteveCan

    Your messiah is trying … with all his petulant little man-child petty rambling, finger pointing, self aggrandizing Bullshit.  It isn’t working

  • Anonymous

    He’s a baby…an illegitimate one at that!!!

    Where is his detailed plan? ohh thats right, all he does is blame the GOP for his failures!!

  • Anonymous

    republicans are like that smelly homeless guy checking all the coin returns on the phone booths.  

    it’s when money is on the line that you see the real heart of a republican.  this jingoistic fantasy fighter would put his/her wallet before any love of country.  it was the same thing when they promised to never forget 9/11 responders until it came to dishing out money for health care.  pathetic.

    i’m gonna feel bad when boehner has to give up his gavel next year.

  • Anonymous

    That was the longest post ever to say what could have been said in one sentence.

  • Anonymous

    President Sharpton’s demagoguery has gotten very old .

    He get letters from ” folks “   .   Sure he does .

    CORPORATE  JETS !

    OIL AND GAS SUBSIDIES !

    MILLIONAIRES AND BILLIONAIRES !

    WHAT  A DISGRACE THIS RABBLE ROUSER IS TO AMERICA .

  • Exgoper

    Oh, is this a “fact” you learned from FoxNews? Or Michele Bachmann? The same people who gave us the phony price tag on his trip to India? 

  • insideguy

     Thank you e83talus but as much as you try and explain things to these people the refuse to understand

  • Anonymous

    The bill passed with bi-partisan support. The lowly Democrats wouldn’t even allow a debate on it. They could have changed some things and sent it back, but as usual they didn’t do jack crap.

  • Ajolily

    “Dealing with the White House is like dealing with Jell-O.” quote from Boehner. Says that basically he was about to or did accept the Presidents plan and the President changed the plan and asked for more money. Not the first time we have heard this from the WH. President wants the talks to fail or have everything his way. Never any intention of compromise.

  • SteveCan

    Must have been a different broadcast, I saw a man with NO PLAN exit stage right with his tail between his legs like a whipped dog.  That’s what happens when you move the goalposts. 

  • Dayo

    The fact that this country is 11 days away from default, with no resolution in sight, is proof that the President AND Congress lack the ability to lead. They are all a bunch of partisan fools.

  • insideguy

    bla bla bla you have no idea what a marxist is you goof

  • Anonymous

    The wingnuts can spin it any way they want. Agent Orange voted four times to raise the debt ceiling under Bush without any restrictions. Spare me the argument Obama voted against it. He now says the vote was wrong. I am waiting for Agent Orange to say he regrets raising the ceiling four times under Bush. 

  • Anonymous

    Fact:

    The insertion of one man’s sack into another person’s mouth. Used a practical joke or prank, when performed on someone who is asleep, or as a sexual act is the act of a democrat and they aren’t very adult. So I agree let the republicans correct it before the idiots tax us out of all the jobs left.

  • Anonymous

    Please do. Two things to keep in mind though, he would probably be impeached and if he can do it then every other President after him can do it. At that point we have no checks or balances and the sky is the limit on the amount of debt we can amass.

  • Anonymous

     Obama and his team of academic Marxists are beginning to make Jimmy Carter look competent.

  • Anonymous

    And how many times did Agent Orange vote to increase the debt ceiling without any restrictions under Bush?

  • SteveCan

    And those ‘jobs’ he worked at would be what???

  • Anonymous

    Seriously, Obama needs to simply rely on the 14th Amendment. Congress approved of the spending, now they want to welsh on it.

  • Anonymous

    Try this young man.. Type in Google… when you get to that page type in Obama Birthday Party..See all those things that come up. They are links. Click anyone.. CBS, MSNBC, FOX. LATimes. Wall Street Journal.. THose things are words. Read them if your able to….. Now go back and whine to someone else

  • Anonymous

    I could care less what a teabagger saw.
    The American people will decide who was willing to rise above politics and who shrank from that responsibility.

  • Darladoon

    they already did that

    and they keep doing that

  • SteveCan

    Mark Haperin and Joe Wilson were both right.

  • Anonymous

    Yea, What are those working stiff jobs he had?  Heck any job will do besides working for the goverment

  • Anonymous

    Barry’s debt cost $4.1 billion a DAY!

  • SteveCan

    Just dying to play that worn out race card aren’t you….

  • Anonymous

    Compared to Bush’s of $1.6 per day.

  • Anonymous

    Poor Barry- he looked so immature, trite, and contumacious. No good for a president.

  • Anonymous

    Who cares? The quantity of times makes no difference. It is the AMOUNT of the raise that matters. The Democrats including Obama voted NO on raising the debt ceiling under Bush. I am happy to post all their dire predictions if we raised the debt ceiling then. Amazing how they forget that now.

  • guest

    For what?  Your response is not reasoned.  As for every other POTUS able to do it, well W set the precedent on that one!

  • Anonymous

    Then remove Barry.

  • Ajolily

    If it is so easy why didn’t the Democrats even come up with a budget in the weeks before the election when they still had a majority? The bill the Republicans passed was not only passed but it was by-partisan.

  • Anonymous

    …can we just enjoy Obama for a moment? Before the policy choices have to
    be weighed and the hard decisions have to be made, can we just take a
    month or two to contemplate him the way we might contemplate a painting
    by Vermeer or a guitar lick by the early-seventies Rolling Stones or a
    Peyton Manning pass or any other astounding, ecstatic human achievement?
    Because twenty years from now, we’re going to look back on this time as
    a glorious idyll in American politics, with a confident, intelligent,
    fascinating president riding the surge of his prodigious talents from
    triumph to triumph. Whatever happens this fall or next, the summer of
    2011 is the summer of Obama. Read more: http://www.esquire.com/features/thousand-words-on-culture/loving-obama-0811#ixzz1SslqoNQ1
     
    Yeah, who doesn’t love the Messiah?

  • guest

    If you do not understand the 14th Amendment, that is your shortcoming!

  • Anonymous

    I see, and George Bush was? ROTFLMFAO

  • guest

    No, that would be you.  Run away, run away.

  • Anonymous

    Hey, 2012freedom, he didn’t leave the Republican party, the party left him. The Republican party is now an *official* Tea Bagger nut case emporium literally *hemorrhaging* rational conservatives and people who aren’t delusional.

    But your screen name says it all. In 2012 we *will* have freedom. Freedom from the right-wing jackal Republicans who are letting the American people get raped by millionaires and billionaires and the crooked corporations and special interests. And I would say you’re taking a reaming yourself, 2012freedom. Unlike you, some of us want justice in our society. Some of us want at least a chance to have some security.

  • SteveCan

    Ooooohhh I like that ‘name calling’ thing you do. I guess maybe that fecal impaction is still bothering you.

    BHO, better known as the man with NO Plan is the one that “shrank from that responsibility” as you put it. He has perfected the art of leading from the rear.

  • Anonymous

    McClanahan?    Oh hell No!

  • Anonymous

    Well…don’t worry because every single person who liked Bush has apparently dropped off the face of the Earth.

    It’s like Creed. Nobody will say they liked them. Yet somehow they sold over 30 million albums or so worldwide.

  • SteveCan

    And you sound kinda like a little girl. Are you?

  • John

    Obummer: Americans are ready for politicians to put politics aside and get stuff done. Yea like for you to just quit spending money you do not have. Read my lips no more taxes. We all know not give drug addict more of what they are addicted. The Obummer administration just wants to keep on spending as usual. Money that is not theirs and driving this country into an abyss of tremendous debt. What an idiot we have as Potus. You cannot continue to tax the very few who are are working or creating jobs. SOCIALISM never never has worked.

  • Anonymous

    Oh, well, as long as he says it was a mistake and all…he voted against it in 2006 and couldn’t bother to show up for a vote in 2007 and 2008.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, coming from you, your response is no surprise because you do not know what the word hypocrite is. I assure you, the American people know and they can remember who they blamed the last time the Federal government shuts down. You are talking a calamity and all the tea baggers are on the record saying there it will not be a big deal. Watch and learn, tool.

  • Anonymous

    He was none of what I said- but Barry is!

    Ouch!

  • Anonymous

    Bi Partisan support?!  Man that makes me laugh out loud!!

    Ron PAul and Michelle Bachman voted against it.  More republicans voted against it than  Dems for it. Is that you definition of bipartisan?

  • Anonymous

    His post was random gibberish.

  • Anonymous

    I’m not going to argue with a teabagger on the internet.  Complete waste of time.
    My point is the American people are ultimately going to make the call who acted in good faith and was willing to compromise and who wasn’t.

    I can understand how that proposition frightens the American Tealiban.

  • Anonymous

    Better to be the teabagger than the teaBAGGIE. Anyone for some hairy man sacks on their chin? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

  • Anonymous

    Says a confirmed racist and race-baiter.

  • Anonymous

    Are you defending the GOP political posturing by pointing out that the Dems did it back then? No Problem.  Obama said he was game for McConnell’s plan. Get out of the way, cover their asses, and let him raise it.

  • Anonymous

    You should- because you suck, too!

    LOL

  • Greg

    The right is so disinterested in governing that they are willing to huddle comfortably and tell fairytales of magical Laffer Curves, willing to launch attacks with twelve sided die on a dragon they call demand and convinced that all outsiders are sickened by their disbelief in similar mystery. They lack proper orientation to operate in a world of form and function… Happy in the shared fantasy that they are the heroes of history.

  • Anonymous

    Oh okay, so as long as someone else does something it is okay to continue to do it? Good reasoning there.

  • Anonymous

    Who employs individual Americans?

    DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • News Of The World

    Boehner has no balls. He has allowed the teabaggers to hijack his party. I’m surprised he didn’t start weeping during his non-response. He and his party will pay the price. At this point, the only adult in the room, Mr. Obama, should simply raise the debt ceiling through 2012, then when the Dems regain control of the House and retain the Senate in November 2012, just pass their own debt reduction plan. There is no dealing with children who don’t have the country’s best interest at heart.

  • Anonymous

    I wonder why Obama hasn’t blamed the collapse of talks on George Bush, the way he has blamed everything else on Bush. I guess even he got sick of that lie.

  • Maynard314

    He was sailing instructor at Kennebunkport at one of his families many vacation homes..

  • Anonymous

    Nope- he even got arrested- I bet you would like to be his cell mate!

  • SteveCan

    You’ve got that name calling thing down pat don’t you. Sure makes you look ‘smart’. LOL

    About making that call … The American people recently did just that (think House losses by Dims) they (the American people) will be doing it again in the near future.

    BOHICA Libs BOHICA

  • Anonymous

    No I do- you don’t and you showed it.

    Try again.

  • Anonymous

    Fact: Kool-aid

  • Anonymous

    *Very* nice :-)

  • Anonymous

    And how many times did the Republicans under Bush submit a balanced budget?

  • Anonymous

    Everyone rues January 20, 2009!

  • Anonymous

    Another lib racist arrives.

  • Anonymous

    Because the republicans filibustered every bill they did not like, including other budgets. Remember when the unemployment checks stopped last April till June. It was because the minority kept filibustering, which is simply continuously debating it so it never comes up for a vote. It was not because they never had a plan. They wanted the same spedning levels that existed in 2009. That was the bill they proposed, but never got to vote on.

  • Jcs528

    Amy miller sucks

  • Anonymous

    Fact: I’d love to end up like the people in Greece thanks to idiots like you! You are a mooch.

  • Anonymous

    Some of us want at least a chance to have some security”

    Yeah, and Barry’s record deficits and debt sure provide that.

    What YOU want is someone else’s money- hey , get a job.

  • http://twitter.com/LippyBroad lippybroad

    So….that guy Barry. He’s cracking up, right? Right in front of our very eyes. Wow. That was one of the saddest spectacles I’ve ever seen. Even the Dems in the room were left breathless by his petulance.

    Between his Op-Ed in USA Today this morning and this…what shall you call it….temper tantrum of Biblical proportions, I think today is the day that we can officially put the final nail in the coffin that is Affirmative Action.

  • Jayamerican1

    Actually, I think Americans are fed up with you Mr. Obama.

  • SteveCan

    “i’m gonna feel bad when boehner has to give up his gavel next year.”

    Bwahahahaha  Thanks I needed a good laugh!

  • Anonymous

    Obama friend arrested in Hawaii
    By: CNN Political Unit(CNN) – A friend of President Barack Obama was arrested Monday for allegedly soliciting sex from an undercover officer posing as a prostitute, according to CNN affiliate Hawaii News Now.Robert Richard Titcomb, 49, was arrested with three other men Monday night and released later that evening after posting $500 bail. He is scheduled to appear at the Honolulu District Court May 2.

  • Dayo

    I don’t see the dems putting a plan on paper. This country is going the way of Greece under this President.

  • Anonymous

    Fact: The leader is to blame and the one who isn’t leading with any plan himself is Obama.

  • Anonymous

    Republicans passed a bi-partisan bill. Democrats haven’t done jack shit. As a matter of fact, they wouldn’t even allow it to go to debate.

  • ceeza

    You jugheads seemed to miss the point.  I didn’t say jobs he worked, which i wont google because I don’t care… I said growing up in a lower middle class family, and once leaving Harvard moving back into lower middle class housing until making his OWN money I believe makes him qualifies to know about “working stiffs”. Rich people grow up around rich people… poor people grow up around poor people.. get it… and obama by no means grew up rich..thats all i was saying…

  • Anonymous

    Bi-partisan = both parties. What was confusing about that for you?

  • Anonymous

    How DARE a coequal branch of government not agree with the administration – OUTRAGE!!!     Seems a bit childish how he acts when he doesn’t get his way huh?  

  • SteveCan

    ” then when the Dems regain control of the House and retain the Senate in November 2012″

    Thanks … I needed a good laugh! Bwahahahahaha

  • Anonymous

    Sure. Let him go for it. I can’t wait for the fireworks.

  • Anonymous

    You mean like “Don’t retreat, reload”?

  • Anonymous

    You mean like “Don’t retreat, reload”?

  • Anonymous

    Fact: Terrorist attack a democrat uses the old duck
    and cover. Economy needs to be worked the democrat uses the old duck and cover.
    Issue after issue the democrat always plays possum.

  • Anonymous

    “Obama Takes On GOP; Angrily Defends ‘Working Stiffs’ Who Struggle Everyday”

    This coming from a guy who is the head of a party that ran unopposed for two years and did nothing, effectively making the economy worse. A guy who increased spending, grew our national debt and printed money on such a ridiculous and stupid scale causing the dollar to fall 11% in value. Which added even a greater burden to the unemployed and underemployed in the form of inflation. ( which is 3.6% btw)

    Obama, you useless, lying, incompetent fool. You may have the gullibly hubris animal known as “liberal” fooled, but not the rest of us free minds.

    By the way, Obama. For a politician, your lying abilities is subpar at best. But that is just one of many things you fail at.

  • Capoman

    Sure and Obama has the detonator and he is willing to take the whole country with it.

  • Anonymous

    I loved how he summoned the children back to school on a Saturday and insist they come up with a solution – where’s his?

  • Anonymous

    Sorry, but I am not a mooch. I have never taken one dime from the government. The problem is you can not understand the calamity this country is facing if the debt ceiling is not raised. It is going to be real fun to watch the tea bag Congressmen and women who said there will be no problem explain themselves to the American people. Good luck.

  • Chris

    It’s actually Bush’s record deficits and debt, not Obama’s. I’ve had MUCH more security with Obama as president rather than Bush. And no, economic security and better markets are NOT the same as wanting someone else’s money. 

  • Anonymous

    I see and of course those votes were highly contested. Epic fail.

  • Capoman

    There there Mr. President… dont’ let them get to you… perhaps you need some Voldimort’s hugs to console you….
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZW_dwd_WJY

  • Anonymous

    Yes, the last impeachment trial went so well, didn’t it. You seem to have a very poor memory. Typical for a bagger.

  • Anonymous

    Well, there will be a lot of openings in D.C. after the Republicans are tossed out on their sorry @sses in 2012. Maybe I can find a job there as a staffer for a Progressive legislator? There will be *several* new ones.

  • Resident of 0bomberVille

    Of course, thanks to 0bomber’s malfeasance in office, fewer and fewer stiffs are ACTUALLY WORKING.

    -0bama  – “Kind of a Dick”-

  • Capoman

    there there Mr. President… dont let them get to ya… perhaps you need some Voldimort Hugs to console you?

  • Anonymous

    Try again, son. Barry’s $1.6 trillion deficit is a RECORD.

    The $14.4 trillion debt is a RECORD!!!

    Barry has added $3.9 trillion to the debt in 2.5 years that’s $1.56 trillion  /year.

    Bush added $5 trillion in 8 years= $625 billion a year

  • Anonymous

    Try again, son. Barry’s $1.6 trillion deficit is a RECORD.

    The $14.4 trillion debt is a RECORD!!!

    Barry has added $3.9 trillion to the debt in 2.5 years that’s $1.56 trillion  /year.

    Bush added $5 trillion in 8 years= $625 billion a year

  • Anonymous

    Yep.  Obama knows the working stiff.  He was one, his wife was one and they both come from a family full of working stiffs. 

  • ProudConservative

    Hey, Libs,

    Obama is following Soros’ orders and this was all planned as part of the New World Order to try and place all of us on an even keel to become more like a third-world order!

    That’s why he and the DEMs have spent soooo very much and now want higher taxes! They just were not expecting nor prepared for the election results last November!

    But, now, they are hell-bent on continuing their goal to bring America down!

    We are on to ya and ain’t gonna let it happen!

  • Chris

    A budget that would destroy the working class and benefit only the rich. You sheep, it’s clear to see which party works for lobbyists by taking away programs and tax breaks that help the middle class while not taxing an extra cent on millionaires and billionaires. 

    Obama and Boehner DID make a bi-partisan plan which the radicals in congress quickly dismissed. The congressmen that YOU elected are acting like kids fighting over a toy, and Obama acting like the dad saying to share. The scary thing is that we, the people, entrusted these kids to pass new laws…

    You’re correct, we can’t wait for November to come.

  • Chris

    A budget that would destroy the working class and benefit only the rich. You sheep, it’s clear to see which party works for lobbyists by taking away programs and tax breaks that help the middle class while not taxing an extra cent on millionaires and billionaires. 

    Obama and Boehner DID make a bi-partisan plan which the radicals in congress quickly dismissed. The congressmen that YOU elected are acting like kids fighting over a toy, and Obama acting like the dad saying to share. The scary thing is that we, the people, entrusted these kids to pass new laws…

    You’re correct, we can’t wait for November to come.

  • Anonymous

    Oh okay. LOL

  • Anonymous

    Good.

  • Anonymous

    Is there a relevance to now?

  • Exgoper

    Why exactly is it “class warfare” to point out that those who benefited the most from thirty years of tax relief and who are enjoying the lowest tax rates in decades should also contribute to bridging the debt? If you have a party that’s pathologically (and dangerously) committed to protecting the tax breaks of millionaires and billionaires, that deserves to be called out by the president. That’s not being a “crybaby.” To the contrary, that’s being an actual adult.

  • Anonymous

    Why do you keep calling him man-child? What does that mean? I’ve never heard anyone called that before… it’s a strange insult.

  • Anonymous

    Why do you keep calling him man-child? What does that mean? I’ve never heard anyone called that before… it’s a strange insult.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NWVKX2P2QBPQ6FHQHCHVIC2ALQ Fedup in Florida

    Esther is right, the Jet Loophole that Obama demonizes so much was part of his own stimulus package..  Go Figure,   He trys so hard to come across as the only adult in the room, when he is anything but.

  • Anonymous

    damn thats funny

  • Anonymous

    Working stiffs will need to struggle even more….

    to pay for mandated health insurance

    to find another way of living in retirement after Social Security goes broke

    to find another way of paying for healthcare in retirement after Medicare goes broke

    to find a way to make a living after Obama has destroyed the private sector job base in the country

    to pay back the $14 trillion the government has borrowed and spent — leaving taxpayers on the hook to the tune of $100,000 for every worker in the workforce.

  • Anonymous

    As I said earlier, most Americans know what a hypocrite is. But more importantly, every tea bagger in Congress has stated it will not be a big deal if the debt ceiling is not raised. They are about to get an education and every education has a price.

  • John

    Deficit Spending : shouldnt that be all you have to know to understand. It’s self explanatory. These. Libturds think we have endless supply of cash. Yeah just keep on printing and printing until 1000 dollars won’t even buy a pack of gum.

  • Chris

    Quick quiz: 
    Who gives businesses money? Do businesses rely more on tax breaks or consumers to make money? Even after the bailouts, did business still fire people when corporate executives got bonuses? Who has the vast majority of American money yet represents only 2% of the population? 

    Do you really, truly believe that we DON’T need to raise taxes on these people? If you really do, I’m not exactly sure how to help you… 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GVWU6V6ORHYQ57UOHAEI52XTVU Dennis

    susbtance?? Yeah I guess since that’s not a word I probably missed it. Your name along with your ideological theories are so repulsive you really don’t even deserve my time for a reply. But if you read the HEADLINE of the story, I think “working stiffs” is well within the substance of this debate.

  • Anonymous

    gee what a stance – you realize the democrats could have done it all without 1 vote being required of the republicans.  They didn’t want to – because they knew they’d all be booted out on their asses so instead they did NOTHING!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GVWU6V6ORHYQ57UOHAEI52XTVU Dennis

    “average folks” = fine, “american working middle class” = fine, “working stiffs” = arrogance

  • Exgoper

    I left the GOP because it no longer shared my values. It used to be the party of fiscal responsibility and sound foreign policy. It’s hard to look at the Bush-Cheney years of reckless spending, magical tax cuts and badly mismanaged wars and see any of the old party still alive and kicking. 

    And the current crop of contenders – Bachmann, Pawlenty, Santorum, Perry, Gingrich, Palin — are doubling down on all the worst parts of W’s legacy. These people personify everything about the GOP that I came to loathe. 

  • Anonymous

    I thought you claimed to be bright, so why the silly “talking points” that make no sense, don’t mean anything and you know is a bunch of b.s.?  

    You wanted to be like Obama? lol

  • Chris

    Haha Stonepark3. There wasn’t ONE spending bill that Bush vetoed. Every bill put forward that would add money to the debt he signed. Many of these bills had annual reoccurring costs which add money to our debt and deficit at an exponential rate, since he passed them without considering the budget. If anything, Obama’s been saving money on small things, yet it makes little difference since big items (like the military, healthcare, entitlement) are the majority of our budget. Social security was prepared for the retirement of the baby boomers in 2000. Our country was experiencing a surplus. We weren’t at war and had favorable international relations. Our healthcare system wasn’t ridiculously inefficient. And once these things are ruined, it’s hard to fix them, especially with a congress which refuses to cooperate with anything.

    Numbers don’t tell the whole story, my friend. Try again, son.

  • Anonymous

    No sweets, the Congressmen are “acting” like they were elected to act like.  You don’t seem to get it do you?  

    Quit with the class warfare – it’s silly and disingenuous.  You’re the sheep because you either believe that bull shit or have serious issues understanding exactly what is happening.  The ludicrous statement about benefiting only the rich is just stupid, absolutely stupid.  
    Next….

  • Anonymous

    Try reading history, how do you think Kings and Queens came to be?

  • Anonymous

    When the final history of America is written, it will be told that the Tea Party brought this country to its knees with their selfishness and childish willingness to be duped by the wealthiest modern-day robber barons.

  • Anonymous

    I used to live on a Yacht docked in Monte Carlo.  Yup, sure did….

    Give it up.  You want to compare a party that came up with a plan to one that stuttered and stammered and came up empty?  Yup – very serious political operation Obama is running.  When is his next tee time?  Where does the lovely little Mrs. want to take the family to next?  

  • Anonymous

    really?  I’m sure you’re very secure flipping homes in Arizona.  Making a blinking fortune!

  • Anonymous

    He’s worked NEVER!  He paid diddlely for his education  NOTHING!  So try another sob story cause this one won’t fly.  

  • Anonymous

    Hmmmm…in my history class we learned that the Tea Party was an awesome thing.

  • TXarc

    The Republican refusal to countenance any way to raise revenues to tackle the massive debt incurred largely on their watch and from a recession which started under Obama’s predecessor makes one thing clear. They are not a political party in government; they are a radical faction that refuses to participate meaningfully in the give and take the Founders firmly believed should be at the center of American government. They are not conservatives in this sense. They are anarchists.

  • ProudConservative

    Too BAD you LIBs and the Liberal Obama Statist Media (his stenographers and lapdogs) gave us this anti-America and anti-Business Present-dent!

    America is wise to and frowning upon you!

  • Anonymous

    He hasn’t acted responsibly since he opened the front door of the White House.  He’s managed to create chaos in his wake – divide the Country like it’s never been divided and act like a freaking Emperor!  That’s what he’s managed to do.  

    So, your marvellous little “post” – into the circular file along with the Empty Suit’s latest tirade. 

  • ProudConservative

    Too BAD you LIBs and the Liberal Obama Statist Media (his stenographers and lapdogs) gave us this anti-America and anti-Business Present-dent!

    America is wise to and frowning upon you!

  • Anonymous

    Really? Everyone one of them has said it doesn’t matter? Every last one of them?

  • Anonymous

    Don’t you realize that the House has already approved this spending in appropriations bills, and that not acting to increase the limit is equivalent to your welching on all your debts and declaring bankruptcy? Most people call that being a deadbeat.

    So we have a Deadbeat House of Representatives majority. Yeah, that’s being “No 1! USA!”

  • ProudConservative

    You’re in the minority according to the polls!

    HehHehHeh

  • Anonymous

    Not a thing. I was thinking bi-partisan in some kind of real world meaningful way and obviously you aren’t.
     
    If one person from the opposing party votes with you you get to officially claim bi partisan. I’ll keep your definition in mind for future discussions.

  • Anonymous

    Okay, sure. If you say so.

  • Paul G

     Remember the few months ago he was ‘locked’ out of the WH? I wanna know who let him back in.

  • Anonymous

    She was a “working stiff”?  In a $300,000 job where she never showed up that was created just for her and hasn’t been filled since she left?  That working stiff?

    Oh and the hard working “Community Organizer” did what?  

  • Anonymous

    Uh, question. Did you listen to the speech? In particular the part where Obama labels himself as one of those well off people he is looking to tax?

  • Anonymous

    they should have damn well changed the locks! lol

  • Anonymous

    Could you explain the details in Cut Cap and Balance?

  • Paul G

     Hey Az…give him a couple more minutes….or the LSM will do it for him. Blame Bush, or Palin.

  • Anonymous

    you wingnuts fall all to pieces every time Obama smacks the crap out of you….cry cry cry…..you lil boehners are sickening

  • Anonymous

    Interesting that a Democrat failed to help a balanced budget pass in 1997. It failed by 1 vote. Imagine how much better off we would have been today had it passed then? Of course now, it is still the Democrats that are keeping us from a balanced budget. History does repeat.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t waste your time. That’s what they do. They make a claim or ask a question and when you respond with something they can’t refute, they change topics or try to change the original meaning of the question. If you played along and showed them evidence of Obama working, for instance, at a sanitation plant, they would just move on to their next deflection rather than concede the point. 

  • ceeza

     Obama was not born with a silver spoon in his mouth thats my only point.. his choice of emplowment and higher education matters not…growing up in a single mother home then raised by his grand parents isn’t a sob sorry .. its simply his story… thats it ..   ps Boehner wasnt born with a silver spoon either..  They happen to be in the minority though unfortunately… unlike you i understand that they try to trick us into black and white and Den v repub  …when it will always be rich v poor… now fixing this mess we may disagree on but best believe both sides are playing a messed up game and WE the country arent winning..     and dont give me the class warfare mumbo jumbo… both sides play it…  the fact is the gaps getting bigger and thats not a good thing for this country…

  • Anonymous

    Ah yes, the liberal media just eats his shit right up don’t they?

    Pathetic liar of a President, baby in chief, empty suit, can’t/won’t lead.  Threatens and throws the hate card, the fear card, and the race card….but they media will support, defend and protect him at all costs.

    pathetic bunch of mealy mouths who are nothing but whores for the dnc and hehimself.

    there is a bipartisan plan that has passed th ehouse, and Harry and his idiot dem followers REFUSE to allow it to come to a vote despite the overwhelming support from the american peopel.  the press don’t support it cus hehimself won’t support it, and the press cowtow to HIM.

    pathetic.

  • tired

    Wait a minute.  I just want to be certain. Was it Bush or Obama who pushed the 800 Billion dollar stimulus?  Was it Bush or Obama who pushed for the (un)Affordable Patient Protection Bill?  Was is Bush or Obama’s budget that added the stimulus money every year?  Well then I guess this is Obama’s debt that he needs the ceiling raised.  And by the way is it class warfare when you constantly assault business.  Just ask Steve Wynn!!

  • http://www.constitutionallibertarian.co.cc/ DavidKramer

    If you are afraid to say raise taxes, you are as much a liar as Obama.

  • Dik Gozinya

    “Working stiffs?” Heh, this pompous, class-baiting a@@hole talks about sh!t he knows nothing about and the fruitcakes on the left lap it up too. Total hypocrisy.

  • Anonymous

    I guess that’s your opinion. I’m a working stiff, my Dad was , and I’ve been around working stiffs all my life. Never saw it as an insult. It’s slang, but not derogatory.

  • Chris

    So, you’re saying that their doing their job and doing what they were elected to do? You think that their job is to bicker and fight and get nothing done? You’re one of the 19% of America that approves of their job? And you actually believe that republicans, and some democrats, are working for the people of the US? 
    If you do, I’m sorry…I can’t help you…

  • ceeza

    you are repeating yourself…

  • Exgoper

    Was it Bush or Obama who made these emergency efforts necessary? 

    Nice try.

  • Anonymous

    Here’s the thing that seems to be getting lost here: These plans have to be negotiated by both parties! I can come up with a list of everything I want too. It doesn’t mean I’m going to get it. No plan, dreamed up by just one of the parties, is going to get the support needed to serve as anything more than a symbolic gesture. That’s why the Republican’s waste of time failed, and I assure you that a Democrat attempt at the same thing will also fail. Both sides have to make a plan and COMPROMISE.

  • Anonymous

    Question: Why did you mention Kool-aid? I know you expressed in another post that you didn’t feel like you could say what you really want to say on Mediaite, but as then, I now fully encourage you to excercise your 1st Ammendment right.

  • Bankman3000

    Ouch!

  • The Real Royal Emperor

    The stench of racism does indeed hang heavily over Mediaite tonight.

  • The Real Royal Emperor

    Just call it Squat, Krap and Dump and it becomes pretty clear.

  • The Real Royal Emperor

    Right. The sure path to personal wealth is getting a government job.

  • tired

    These are emergency efforts??  This is a President who never made a budget yet along wrote a paycheck.  The stimulus did absolutely nothing.  Only 6% of that money went for construction the rest bailed out unions and state governments.  Everyone agrees even Obama that they weren’t really “shovel ready”.  Now he writes this $800 billion into his next budget.  Is that an emergency?  No I don’t think so!
    And was the Healthcare bill fiscally responsible or an emergency?  No I don’t think so!  So get off the Bush did it ticket.  Look I’m no fan, but I can also see what this guy is doing as well.  Wake up don’t fall for patent party lies.  Do your own research

  • The Real Royal Emperor

    And, I am not expecting the party of Boehner and Can’tor is going to be looking very good to hard-working Americans trying to support their families and themselves and do right by their nation.

  • Dayo

    Why has the President let this debt issue go on this long? Where is his leadership? Why didn’t he present a budget, oh, say, 2 YEARS ago? I hate to say it, but is this the grand plan? Bring America to its knees? A real leader would have addressed this issue long before now.

  • Greg

    You are a scholar of the first order.

  • The Real Royal Emperor

    And, that’s very sad. Throughout the 20th Century, the Republicans and the Democrats, through love of their country and a spirit of compromise, even congeniality, built a nation the envy of the world. The Republicans played an indispensible role in that. And, now, so much of the Republican party is nothing but self-serving, insular extremists singularly dedicated to tearing down everything it took a century to build. I have no doubt this type of Republican will be a short, ugly phase in the party’s history, and that once again the party will come to consist of good and decent men and women who love their country. My only fears are the damage they will do in the short time they share power and whether the good and decent Republicans still in office, and there are many, can carry on.

  • Greg

    You behave wonderfully in public.

  • Greg

    History is unequal to your reason.

  • Greg

    History is unequal to your reason.

  • The Real Royal Emperor

    Isn’t that the truth!

  • Greg

    You wear your independent thinking like a hard won badge.

  • The Real Royal Emperor

    Of course he didn’t listen. But, in all fairness, he is wonderful benevolent in sharing his utter ignorance with us.

  • Anonymous

    Here’s a little hint, junior, prog / libs are not nearly the intellectual giants that they think they are. Seriously, don’t you ever feel used? The political elitists are such because.. umm.. Oh, yeah, they went to Ivy League schools, so they’re smart as muthaf***rs, no? And you went, where? Bush got an MBA man, went to Yale, etc. so on an so forth. Fact is, that means shit.

    There’s two types of people who want change. Anarchists, and people who’re proud of where they are but recognize that we have to curb our appetite if we continue to exist.

    Recognize that Obama is an asshole and a tool, then come back.

  • Anonymous

    Here’s a little hint, junior, prog / libs are not nearly the intellectual giants that they think they are. Seriously, don’t you ever feel used? The political elitists are such because.. umm.. Oh, yeah, they went to Ivy League schools, so they’re smart as muthaf***rs, no? And you went, where? Bush got an MBA man, went to Yale, etc. so on an so forth. Fact is, that means shit.

    There’s two types of people who want change. Anarchists, and people who’re proud of where they are but recognize that we have to curb our appetite if we continue to exist.

    Recognize that Obama is an asshole and a tool, then come back.

  • The Real Royal Emperor

    Be careful. Science Denial is a key principle of modern Republicanism.

  • Greg

    The tea party is not even a party but a cohort of textual fanatics dedicated to a minimalism that correlates with their comprehension.

  • Greg

    Not true by any standard but easily a standard measure of your dedication to truth.

  • Etnrk

    The original Boston Tea Party was a rebellion against corroboration between corporation and state, to the detriment of the colonists.  Basically over tax cuts to a large corporation.  Today’s faux tea party has nothing in common with the original ‘awesome thing’.  Actually, the tea party of today was originated by, is sponsored by, and naively doing the bidding of large multinational corporations at the bequest of the Koch brothers, to the detriment of democracy and the rights and welfare of the individual hard working American citizen.  If you only watch Foxnews and listen to conservative talk media, your understanding of today’s events will be as lacking as that of your history.  
     

  • The Real Royal Emperor

    And, you think she started that way? Wow. Your hatred is deep.

  • Greg

    A wonderful inversion that distracts in a manner that serves illusion.

  • The Real Royal Emperor

    You are total filth.

  • The Real Royal Emperor

    Amen, I say, “Amen!”

  • Greg

    Factually false statement from one comfortable with casual attention to reality.

  • SteveCan

    Yes I’m sure you’re right … I guess that ‘change’ in the house was a direct response to his “petty rambling”. And I suspect we’re gonna see more of that response to his hackneyed sloganeering and $ 4.1 bill daily bill coming up pretty quick (think elections).

    So I guess you are in favor of bankrupting America rather than getting our spending habits under control? Is that it?

  • Nature Freak

    Dik is a Gentleman and a Scholar.
    Not really. Not even close.
    Antithesis comes to mind.

  • Greg

    You demonstrate a preternatural ability to identify categorical sums.

  • The Real Royal Emperor

    Extraordinarily well put. I do enjoy someone who can work with the English language. There are far too few of you.

  • Bankman3000

    You have to understand that Obama is a man because of his age and a child because of his behavior.  He can’t keep a job, uneducated, doesn’t take care of his kids, doesn’t take care of his wife, isn’t in a stable relationship and …. and….. a lot of other bad things that a man of 50 shouldn’t be doing.

  • The Real Royal Emperor

    I suspect Terri from Texarkan has been asked to leave many a restaurant. Even cafeterias.

  • Anonymous

    Do you get extra pennies if you use extra long words? Or, do you just really like to use dictionary.com?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GWUMDXSUYVXFOVKEDR7OG3SD7A John Doe

    Barack Obama is the most pathetic demagogue ever to walk the surface of
    the earth; anyone listening to him now and regrettably took what he says
    as facts would be left with the notion that the Republicans wants to
    punish those who “Who Struggle Everyday”, in favor of those “filthy
    rich” individuals like Jeffrey Immelt(Chairman and CEO of General Electric) amongst
    others, who actually worked tirelessly with the organized mainstream
    media which they control, and essentially bought him the presidency
    after a USD$650,000,000 campaign in 2007 & 2008.

    It is all these demagoguery with minority voters that Obama and the
    Democrats have done for the past 5 years to woo the Latino vote by
    simply “TALKING” about “immigration reform” and waiting until the lame
    duck session to bring forward the so called “dream act”. Frankly the
    demagoguery and mere “talking” has been sufficient enough to keep
    getting the Democrats the Hispanic vote after exploiting the ignorance
    of the Latinos who actually vote to keep them in office. After the 2006
    elections, the Democrats had TOTAL CONTROL of the Senate and House of
    Representatives, with an overwhelming majority for 4 full years: from
    January 3, 2007 to January 3, 2011. And for 2 years within those 4
    years, they also had control of the White house after Obama was elected
    in 2008. If majority of Latino voters are not so ignorant and look
    beyond the lip service, they should easily see that Democrats prefer to ”
    talk” about amnesty or push the Dream Act forward now that they can be
    opposed by the House, and tell the Latino people that
    Republicans are the obstacle to what Hispanics desire, therefore they
    should vote for democrats ONCE AGAIN as they usually do. Having total
    control f the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives gives
    you the privilege of doing whatever you want to do, if you actually
    wanted to do it and not the cheap demagoguery in play.

    This demagogue-in-chief and his party is now applying the same tactics
    with the debt crisis and exploiting the sentiments of Seniors and
    “Ordinary Americans Who Struggle Everyday” by using their now two most
    favorite catch phrases: “End Medicare As We Know It” and “For
    Millionaires And Billionaires”. Maybe the debt crisis will not come to
    this point if since January 20th 2009, he actually led a fiscally
    responsible government and created a business friendly atmosphere for
    small business to be confident in hiring/creating new jobs by investing
    more, thereby creating more tax payers that bring in revenue. The truth
    is always a bitter pill to swallow, but a true leader would have been
    honest like Chris Christie and admitted to the American people that the
    three biggest entitlement programs Social Security, Medicare and
    Medicaid will be totally bankrupt in several years, beginning 9 years
    from now, rather that using their catch phase that Republicans want to
    “End Medicare As We
    Know It” to stir up sentiments of the Seniors who are actually not
    affected by an overhaul of the programs which are a “necessity” if the
    programs are going to be available for future generations.The Democrat
    controlled congress did not pass a budget for almost 3 years, and now
    the freshman Republicans in the House are trying to make Government
    function as it should by bringing forth a budget, but all the Democrats
    and Obama does is demagoguery and pathetically doing so without a plan
    of their own as an alternative.

    It is a shame to have a President of this kind, rather than a true
    leader and uniter, but I hope that those who voted for him in 2008 will learn
    from their mistakes and never repeat them. If there are any mature folks
    here who have been following politics over the decades, you will
    probably realize that the phrases such as “Pay Their Fair Share” “Shared
    Sacrifice” and “For Millionaires And
    Billionaires” are only used by Socialists and Communists in South
    American countries and Asia. The tone of this president is so
    un-American and clearly not one of a Capitalist, and a fact to note is that the so called “filthy rich” who
    make up only 5%(leaving the remaining 95%) of the population already are
    responsible for “45% of the federal government’s total revenue”, while almost
    half of the entire population pay “NO federal income taxes at all”. Yet
    this demagogue-in-chief consistently tries to insinuate that the wealthy
    do no “Pay Their Fair Share”. A Communist will only be satisfied if the
    rich are allowed to keep only 10% of what they earn, while government
    retains 90 percent of it for their reckless spending on endless wars and
    food stamps for the voters who keep them in power.

  • Anonymous

    Obama hit that one out of the park! Nice job Mr. President.

  • Greg

    Ditto

  • Anonymous

    ooooooo good zinger

  • Anonymous

    Wow that is big news.   Was he in a bathroom stall at the airport?

  • Nature Freak

    Obama’s opponents have vastly underestimated the POTUS.
    Hubris will be the undoing of the Tea Party.

  • Greg

    Your struggles range from spacing to historiography, with nothing between not badly abused.

  • Dik Gozinya

    Obama never steps out from under the shadow of George W. Bush. LMFAO! heheheheheheheheheh.

  • Greg

    I write as I think, consequence of advanced levels of literacy.

  • Anonymous
  • Bankman3000

    Actually, the Republicans had a FREE way of getting the country out of a financial crisis and they also had a FREE way to get the economy going after a recession.

    In case you haven’t noticed George W. Bush did EVERYTHING right and Barack H. Obama has done EVERYTHING wrong.

    It’s just like how Ronald Reagan did EVERYTHING right and Jimmy Carter did EVERYTHING wrong. 

  • Nature Freak

    “exploiting the ignorance of the Latinos who actually vote to keep them in office.”
    You do not really care for Hispanics and Latinos do you?
    You sound rather prejudice to me.

  • http://twitter.com/RonCdeWeijze Ron C. de Weijze

    03:44 No those people are not mad at Democrats and those people are not mad at Republicans. They are mad at the elites, putting their own interests first by definition. http://crpa.co/CRPA-Philosophy-General.htm#elitism

  • Anonymous

    Look who Floriduhhh made Govenor!

  • Nature Freak

    Regarding your use of grammar, it is very obvious “rajahaan” did not go to an Ivy League school.

  • Anonymous
  • Etnrk

    Unopposed?!!!  Your ignorance of Congressional process and of how the GOP manipulated it by unprecedented and inappropriate use of the filibuster to smother any and everything our President tried to do to alleviate the suffering brought upon us by 30 years of middle class squashing Reagonomics, and 12 years of pandering to the wealthy and corporations causing our current debt and deficit is astounding. Unfortunately though, all too common in light of today’s fog of propagandist conservative media. 

  • Anonymous

    He’s a Marxist, Mowist, Socialist, Communist, Nazi,,,,hold on..I gotta go to World Nut Daily to find more.

  • Anonymous

    Hey Dikless, got a few questions for you. 

    Why do you call Obama a “pompous, race-baiting a@@hole”?  Based on what?
    Why do you think he “knows nothing about” the deficit?  Where’s he wrong?
    And how did you determine I’m a freaking “fruitcake”?  My being a progressive, and all.
    I think you’re talking out of your ass.

  • Bankman3000

    Yeah, why would anyone leave the GOP?  That doesn’t make any sense.  I mean so what they stand firmly for corporations over citizens and sure they stand for the rich over the poor but other than that….

  • Anonymous

    Sorry, Greg.  I clicked on the wrong reply button.

  • Anonymous

    I never seen him that pissed off before. That’s for sure.

  • The Real Royal Emperor

    Another Tea Partier who doesn’t know how to use a Thesaurus.

  • Greg

    :)

  • Nature Freak

    I live in the same state as Tina.
    Poor Tampa, they have enough troubles as it is.

  • Bankman3000

    Come on now… you know they didn’t listen to the speech.

    They probably barely read the headline before they started regurgitating their pre programmed messages.

    Think about it – Rush “the Republican Leader” Limbaugh tells his listeners to let him think for them and then he tells them “don’t doubt me.”

  • Anonymous

    Boehner to Brick Obamo: “I Won.”

    The bludgeoning Obamo is taking is so beautiful to see. Mr. ‘Pitchfork’ is now getting stabbed by one that the private sector and Conservatives are holding. Quick to deflect blame as only Brick Obamo can, we should all note that this is ‘Happening on Obamo’s Watch.’

    I LOVE this!

  • Anonymous

    Colby, how does having the Federal government borrow a couple trillion more dollars, and taxing themselves another trillion help the average Joe?

    Let’s say we remove the corporate jet tax break that Obama’s stimulus bill brought us. Does that solve our problems? Does that improve my life in any way, shape, or form?

  • Anonymous

    Very well stated.  Not an untrue word. 

  • http://www.constitutionallibertarian.co.cc/ DavidKramer

    Nice example of the concern troll. You should of said something like “I did not leave my party, my party left me” or some other form.

  • http://www.constitutionallibertarian.co.cc/ DavidKramer

    Since the leftists always like polls. Those that favor cut cap and balance was at 66%. I guess the leftists really do not care what the people think though.

    Huh?

  • Greg

    Well stomped out if by the common Equus Ferus.

  • http://www.constitutionallibertarian.co.cc/ DavidKramer

    Obama tells White House press corp what to go out and say.

    GEEZ! http://www.breitbart.tv/when-you-go-write-your-stories-obama-calls-out-wh-press-corps/

    Get out there members of the Ministry of Truth and spread your New Speak!

  • labman57

    Hey, the Republicans want to compromise on the federal debt issues as well.However, the Republican concept of compromise – a key component of any meaningful negotiation – is for the opposition to discard their own beliefs and completely embrace the conservative point of view.In short, their notion of negotiation involves capitulation by the opposition­.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NWVKX2P2QBPQ6FHQHCHVIC2ALQ Fedup in Florida

    You have to understand that Progressivism = Socialism, so really things are proceeding along nicely for the Pres and his crew…  maybe moments like the one we find ourselves in right now are not so comfortable, but still fit nicely into the plan.. How is it the the President and his friends in the Senate really think that this issue could be solved in a month….  They knew that it couldn’t. We are talking about a concern that spends $10,000,000,000,000 / day.  Something that large you do not write a budget for in a couple of weeks, but they need this final crisis moment to pass another POS legislation down America’s throat.  The reason Dems never bothered with budgets is that budgets really don’t fit their needs, in a country who ownes the world’s exchange currency, as well as some bad assed printing presses why should they concern themselves with pesky little things such as budgets..  This will not stop as long as progressives are in power, if you read up on the progressive movement you will see that they really don’t believe in the same natural rights that the founders did.  Back in the 1920′s the great thinkers of the day began to take a Darwinian approach to the constitution and we see the results today. ,They believe the constitution to be an evolving document, and they do not believe that you are born with natural rights rather it is their understanding that you have rights because the state has granted you those rights. They feel that there should be no limitation to the state in its persuit of a just and equal society.   If you are shocked by the amount of change that has occured in the last three years and are having a hard time taking it in..  This is the Progressive moment, they never have cared for capitalism, they have never trusted or understood industry, and they think that the government should be tasked in every aspect of your life.  And there is no mistaking that Obama, Reid, and Pelosi are all Progressives.

  • Greg

    And in a “related video”…

    http://www.everydaylifestyles.com/articles.php?t202id=93091&t202kw=ads_8b2_2ba

    Damn you Breitbart… you’ve been hiding the truth all this time… all this time!

  • Nature Freak

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43857267/ns/world_news-europe/
    http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/...

    “The suspect arrested for twin terror attacks in Norway Friday has been
    identified as Anders Behring Breivik, according to media reports in the
    U.K. and Norway.

    Norwegian media has linked Breivik to a Facebook account in which the poster described himself as a Christian conservative.

    Norwegian television said that Breivik belongs to right-wing circles in
    Oslo, and a Swedish newspaper has reported the Breivik has posted on
    right-wing forums in Norway”
     
    Nothing to do with Islam.

    A right wing Christian Conservative. Interesting.

  • Greg

    Revenue is added to the plus column which is next to the minus column.  When a minus is big, a plus makes it less big.  A less big minus is good.

  • Dik Gozinya

    It’s good you see things the way you’ve been schooled.

  • Dayo

    If the country goes into default it is on Obama’s watch. He should have been a leader instead of a partisan hack.

  • Greg

    Impossible… a range of credible trolls told me today that Islam would destroy me/ you/ us/ most all/ because of their dedication to madness and general misbehavior.  Must be the Norwegian “Lamestream” media… looked up the Norwegian translation for lame.. it’s the same…”lame”.

  • Anonymous

    I could, but that would be an utter waste of time.  I wish they had made the CBO score it, because it would have been hilarious.

  • Greg

    Yes… he should assume the collective authority of all three branches and impart his will… how sweet such leadership would be.  

  • Greg

    Yes… he should assume the collective authority of all three branches and impart his will… how sweet such leadership would be.  

  • Anonymous

    So, why hasn’t he written a check to the Treasury?

  • Anonymous

    What does the debt ceiling have to do with spending?

    The money is already spent and if Boehner wanted a fight he should have waited until the committees had passed their budgets and done this in September when they have to pass the budget for FY 2012.

  • Anonymous

    The debating skills of Greg.
    A wonderful inversion that distracts in a manner that serves illusion.
    Well stomped out if by the common Equus Ferus.
     They lack proper orientation to operate in a world of form and function… Happy in the shared fantasy that they are the heroes of history. History is unequal to your reason.This is what happens when you sit behind your desk in your tighty whities while the wife is out earning a living. Change to boxers, it will allow more brain flow to your head.

  • Anonymous

    lol…I’m not saying the Republican bill isn’t NAMED nicely, with pretty words and all, but when you start actually EXPLAINING what’s in it to the American people those numbers go way down.
    80% percent of Americans don’t want Medicare and SS touched.  Period.

    Just like most Americans didn’t think the debt limit should be raised until they found out exactly what that means.
    Then they did.

    Moral of the story:  Purdy Republican slogans poll real nice.

  • Anonymous

    It’s the surest way going at the moment.

  • Rio

    He has been referred to as a man-child since his days in the Illinois State Senate.  I first noticed it during the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act debate in blogs and local newspaper comments.  People were angered because he wouldn’t cast a vote without Planned Parenthood telling him whether to vote present, aye or nay.  He later lied about his voting record on that bill during his 08 campaign. 

  • Nature Freak

    LOL!
    Obama must secretly control Norway. Obama is framing Christian Conservatives. Obama is setting up a caliphate. Free Anders Behring Breivik! (mega sarcasm alert)

  • Anonymous

    Obama blew more money in his first year than both wars have cost us to date. And, he’s also decided that such spending is the new baseline.That people who already carry the majority of the load still have more is not reason enough to take more from them so that Obama can continue to blow the budget up.

    Do you understand why they don’t pass a budget?

  • Greg

    Thank’s Nature… horrible and sad news.  From the latin…Homo Homini Lupus.  From me… Fu*k the inhumane monsters to hell.  

  • Anonymous

    Why do you even bother posting something so nonsensical? Which do you think would have more of an impact on fixing this problem: A) Allowing Bush tax breaks for the rich to go away, or B) If President Obama liquidated all of his assests and donated his entire worth to the treasury?

    I have to ask, since you question his willingness to part with some of his money, do you think he is just pulling the Cons leg about raising taxes?

  • Anonymous

    It was Obama, Reid and Pelosi. If they’d dealt with the debt ceiling, or passed a budget, we wouldn’t be having this conversation. They didn’t.

  • Anonymous

    People want to pay more so that Obama can spend his ass off! He’s so good at it. What are these Rethuglicans thinking?

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, that’s why that last election went so badly for them. How do my balls taste?

  • Anonymous

    No, Bush never ran a trillion dollar deficit. Obama has never run anything but, and he’s up to three now, and planning 10 more.

  • Greg

    I have not engaged in proper debate… none on the right will have me as opposition.
    I pride myself in proper appointment… always properly clothed independent of location with an eye on function… from my smart wool socks to my watertight cap. 
    We both earn quite well and share with dedicated affection.  

  • John

    Obummer and the libturds have no plan. None. They prefer to keep on spending us into oblivion. The tea party backed congress are the only ones with a serious plan to cut cap and have a balanced budget amendment. Lack of leadership is to blame for this mess. People wake up, this country has no chance of improvement while the democRATS are in power. Come on 2012.

  • Anonymous

    You obviously are not that certain.

    1)  The stimulus was set out for 3 fiscal years, and if I remember it was roughly 1/3 tax cuts, 1/3 to aiding state budgets, and 1/3 is miscellaneous programs.

    2)  Since it has not been implemented and I read conflicting reports, this seems rather specious.

    3)  You are not certain, because it was set out for 3 fiscal years, as I pointed out in my first point.

    4)  Yes.  Constantly assaulting business, while they give him millions of dollars for his reelection campaign.  That’s logical.

  • Nature Freak

    I worry about this happening here. We are so polarized in America at the moment.
    It is so predictable. After every shooting or bombing, people immediately blame Islam. Americans need to grow up!
    The ones here who blamed Islam for this atrocity will never apologize. Take that to the bank!

  • Anonymous

    Yes, yes. We all realize this was the Republican plan. You don’t need to remind us.

  • Greg

    Dear Gar1956,

    I write to you tonight to notify you of a unique situation.  I have identified a kindred soul, a lighthouse for your wayward raft, a stable for your band of goats, a barrel for your stash of moonshine.  His name is John and he emotes in a manner you must admire, proclaims so that you might desire and describes with a burning fire that can only ignite your very soul.  Take care as you approach for he(r) is a gentle soul… easy to spook and quick to flee.  Woo he(r) with gentle words and soon you both shall join in eternal rhetorical bliss.  Your welcome.

    Greg

  • Anonymous

    You should really pay attention.

    1)  ”The stimulus did absolutely nothing.”  Seems that a majority of economists disagree with you on this point.  

    2)  1/3 was for relief of the states and we can quibble about the unions bit.

    3)  ”Do your own research”?  You obviously haven’t, because this whole “deal” was depending on the day either a 10 or 12 year timetable.

    But you knew that, right?  Because you “do your own research” (sic).

  • Anonymous

    Ah, the catch, Pablo, is that the American people see the ugliness and duplicity of the Republicans now. They ran on jobs. They gave us at last count 13 abortion bills. They ran on fiscal responsibility in the states and they ended up producing even more abortion bills and have attempted to destroy unions. Now with the debt ceiling debate, we see that the Republicans are willing to destroy the American economy and plunge the nation into the Second Great Depression because of a piece of paper they signed for that scumbag Grover Norquist. All the Republicans care about are making the rich richer and kowtowing for corporations. The Republicans have spit in the face of the poor/working class/middle class time and again. They are in *serious* trouble. Especially with the pathetic clowns they have as potential presidential nominees. Really, the only question now is if the Democrats will get enough seats to win the House, because the Senate and Presidency are secure.

  • Anonymous

    I do not think an addiction to polls is a sign of ideological allegiance, but rather a sign of a weak mind.

    Asking people that have no idea about the bill is like asking little girls if they like ponies.  It tells you absolutely nothing, because most little girls like ponies.

    As Homer said, “In theory.  In theory communism works.”

  • Greg

    The trolls were even claiming that Mediaite moved the headline to obscure the role of Islam in global disorder… fantasy is their black tar heroin, while meth remains their meth.  

  • http://www.constitutionallibertarian.co.cc/ DavidKramer

    100% of leftists asked if taxes should be raised on the other rich, said yes.

    .0001% of leftists asked if taxes should be raised on themselves, said yes.

    Now, if you asked if SS and Medicare bureaucracy should be cut to say 10% of what it is now, I bet everyone would agree with that, except those working in that bureaucracy. I wonder what it costs to run those bureaucracies? Why don’t you dig that up for me, I have tried, the government does not like to provide that though.

    How many 100s of thousands of employees does it take to implement these systems like the new Obama Care takeover bureaucracy being implemented now?

    Do you think if you asked medicare recipients if they like the FACT that $500 billion was stolen to implement Obama Care?

    I was making the point that people in the VAST majority want a balanced budget amendment. You can attempt to spin your polls all you want.

    We the taxpayer do not want a draconian government that soaks up all the money in the economy. We the taxpayer have had it with the communist style apparatchik being implemented in the US.

  • Anonymous

    Cut the deficit
    by ½ in a year

    Cap
    spending to 19% of GDP

    Balanced
    Budget Amendment to the Constitution

  • Anonymous

    The beautiful thing is that Brick Obamo is getting unhinged and very near bursting into flames. Libs were fattening themselves with caviar n 2008-2009, expecting ‘perpetual Democratic majorities’ and all sorts of other orgasmic outcomes to their ‘historic’ win.

    It is so terrific to see these Dim Libs in such a state of despair and rage. The pitchfork-holder-in-Chief is acting like the Devil we know he is.

  • http://www.constitutionallibertarian.co.cc/ DavidKramer

    Yep, only if they can get humans to completely quit being human, communism would be great…………for the party apparatchik.

  • http://www.constitutionallibertarian.co.cc/ DavidKramer

    Also, well maybe not ideological allegiance, it certainly corresponds to how much bull or propaganda one wants to push.

  • Rio

    Mediate’s very own Eddy Haskel. 

  • Anonymous

    Impeached?  What high crime and misdemeanor would they charge him with until the issue had been hashed out in court?

    How do we have no checks and balances?  The President is basically saying, “Well you wrote the checks (told the Executive to make contracts for X,Y, and Z) and now we have to pay for them.”  

    Invoking the 14th Amendment doesn’t change the fact that spending still originates in the House.  But you knew that, right?The very idea of a debt ceiling is highly dubious as far as its constitutionality.  

  • Anonymous

    Obama is against the America of the past and present. He wants to
    transform us into brundlefly.

  • Dayo

    Did you type that while in your satin smoking jacket, with your pipe loosely clamped between your teeth?

  • Anonymous

    SO, that’s as specific as it gets? Just cut , without naming the cuts?
    Isn’t that what Obama did that ya’ll keep complaining about?

  • Greg

    If we are aiming toward accuracy, I would suggest Higgins the dog… a loyal and faithful guardian.  

  • Greg
  • Greg

    Yes… a temporal anarchist who wishes to overlap space and time in such a manner as to generate a perverted overlap of man and fly… very astute analysis of our current predicament.  You deserve an award… as does your middle school social science instructor.  

  • Anonymous

    People really need to stop saying something is bi-partisan when a handful of people in the opposing party vote for it.  Problems?  Oh yeah.  

     1)  Cutting $112 billion out of discretionary spending for one fiscal year?  That’s a pretty tall order given the diversity of discretionary spending, even though it is only around 19% of the total budget.  Why not just do this through the normal budgeting process that is not due until October?

    2)   Congress passes a budget every year and this bill overlooks that fact in a huge way.  It’s vague wording about the “global war on terrorism” being exempted.  Wait.  It gets better.  They exempt Social Security, etc.

    3)  It caps spending overall spending as part of the GDP by a decreasing percentage every year.  Oh.  By the way, it also specifies that those exemptions for Social Security etc. disappear.  Do I have to spell it out?

    4)  The most asinine part is the balanced budget part, which if it ever was ratified by 3/4 of the states would require a 2/3 majority in both chambers to raise taxes.  I would think that the Founding Fathers would have written that into the Constitution in the first place.

    Any questions there 2012freedom?  I am more than happy to talk about any part of the Curious, Crap, and Bullshit bill if you like.

  • Anonymous

    I sure hope you got that right on your geography test, because you’d fail on every other count.

  • Anonymous

    You may laugh, but the numbers say that the best odds are a majority for the Dems in the House and a majority of Pubs in the Senate with Obama reelected.  

  • Anonymous

    Hard to decide which of these is the dumbest, but I’ll go with the last one.

    Yes.  $100,000.  If they just showed up and said, “Pay us now.”  I am sure you have a historical precedent for this scenario, right?

  • Anonymous

    S&P Raises State of Ohio’s Credit Rating, Cites GOP Governor Kasich’s Budget.
    Wisconsin adds half of all jobs created IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY for the month of June
    ====================
    The Republican’s policies are working and showing immediate results. Obama’s policies are failing. That’s why he’s so pissed off and acting like a d*ck.

  • Anonymous

    You’re stupid!!

  • Anonymous

    Agreed!!!! Everyone now wants to speak up and trash this President when Bush had PLENTY to do with this. Hasn’t anyone wondered why he lays so low…he even knows it. Blame Obama is what everyone wants to do. It is everyone’s responsibility. Sounds to me he is sticking up for the little ppl!!! Everyone is so damn greedy!!!

  • Anonymous

     Stonepark…well I suppose Obama RAN the whole bill up ALL BY HIMSELF!!! I dnt think he was in office during this tax cuts…the Bush tax cuts. OBAMA didn’t throw us into a SENSELESS war with IRAQ to find the “oh so vicious Saddam Hussein”. Obama got Bin LAden, yet no one even brings that up now…he11 ppl even have the GALL to give the credit to BUsh!! It’s disturbing. Seems there is a bitterness that ppl use against this president. It is sad and disrespectful!!! Get a life!!! Quit being so damn greedy

  • Anonymous

     Chris, you really know what u  r talking about

  • Anonymous

    Or a cautionary tail about unintended consequences.

    Obama intended to be spending his way to
    re-election.(Martin Brundle) Then
    the Tea Party (The Fly) came along and changes the debate to cuts. So Obama
    decides he will take the essence of the Tea Party (Cuts) into his agenda but
    only in appearance while he pursues spending (revenue and investments) What we
    are left with is a hot mess (Brundelfly)

    Ok…The truth of the matter is I just saw the
    deleted scene from The Fly and will never be the same.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QizX5msl-G0

  • Nature Freak

    Greg, ignore your attackers and detractors.
    Many if them, I suspect are addicted to Jenkem.
    Just say no to Jenkem.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-SB7kKwn1A
    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/new-drug-alert
    It is a big problem with Conservatives,

  • Anonymous

    Man, I think the temperature at the White House just spiked. “Lame Duck Obama”. “Leading from behind”. Ouch! You know that left a mark.

    After listening to the President’s press conference today, let’s keep in mind the following:This is the same president who proposed an absurdly irresponsible budget that would increase our debt by trillions of dollars, and whose party failed to even put forward a budget in over 800 days! This is the same president who is pushing our country to the brink because of his reckless spending on things like the nearly trillion dollar “stimulus” boondoggle. This is the same president who ignored his own debt commission’s recommendations and demonized the voices of fiscal sanity who proposed responsible plans to reform our entitlement programs and rein in our dangerous debt trajectory. This is the same president who wanted to push through an increase in the debt ceiling that didn’t include any cuts in government spending! This is the same president who wants to slam Americans with tax hikes to cover his reckless spending, but has threatened to veto a bill proposing a balanced budget amendment. This is the same president who hasn’t put forward a responsible plan himself, but has rejected reasonable proposals that would tackle our debt. This is the same president who still refuses to understand that the American electorate rejected his big government agenda last November. As I said in Madison, Wisconsin, at the Tax Day Tea Party rally, “We don’t want it. We can’t afford it. And we are unwilling to pay for it.”Now the President is outraged because the GOP House leadership called his bluff and ended discussions with him because they deemed him an obstruction to any real solution to the debt crisis.He has been deemed a lame duck president. And he is angry now because he is being treated as such.His foreign policy strategy has been described as “leading from behind.”Well, that’s his domestic policy strategy as well. Why should he be surprised that he’s been left behind in the negotiations when he’s been leading from behind on this debt crisis?Thank you, GOP House leaders. Please don’t get wobbly on us now.2012 can’t come soon enough.— Sarah Palin

  • Nature Freak

    Jeff Goldblum is a Democrat.
    http://www.newsmeat.com/celebrity_political_donations/Jeff_Goldblum.php
    So is Genna Davis.

  • Nature Freak

    I just watched most of your Youtube link.
    Very cool.
    Thanks for posting this. I may disagree with your politics, but I enjoyed the “deleted baboon” scene.
    Great movie. better than the Vincent Price original in my opinion.
    Cool!

  • Ted Joy

    How can Boehner give a serious response to someone as utterly frivolous and uninformed as the President?

  • Ted Joy

    How about this — we raise taxes on the upper income brackets immediately after we require the 47% of the population who pay no Federal taxes at all to pay their fair share — say about 10% of their gross income?

  • Anonymous

    this is America not the banana republic, just imagine if President Bush
    had done this, everyone here and the press and media would have gone
    ballistic and would have been shouting qustions at Bush, how different
    his press treats him. Grow up obama 

    you mean when republicans were calling anyone a terrorist sympathiser if they didn’t goose step to bush’s disasterous plans?  and bush and republicans DID do what obama is scolding them about: raising the debt ceiling.  the fact that conservatives are crying like little babies shows exactly that obama not only drew blood but is reflecting what polls keep showing: if america defaults, republicans are going to be destroyed in the elections.  you think 70 million people, veterans, social security recipients, contractors, etc are going to sit idly by while republicans destroy this country?  and to think just a few short months ago republicans thought they were going to retake the senate and white house in 2012.  after this fiasco, showing how republicans have no idea how to run a government or economy, they’ll be lucky to have over 100 members left in the house. 

    it takes more than bumper sticker slogans and reciting ayn rand to run a government.  its time for real americans to take their government back from conservative children.

  • Ted Joy

    Dik, does this mean that you know so much because you are unschooled?  Just curious.

  • Anonymous

    Bush didn’t put the wars on the books like Obama did. Bush left a huge mess!!  The bankers are stealing from the Taxpayers and the teabaggers are letting them get away with it.  I guess you like being bankers robbing you. 

  • Anonymous

    Obama hit that one out of the park!!  

  • Anonymous

    Obama is a delusional disgrace. He’s bankrupt the country by blocking the will of the people.
    Generations of prosperity pissed away by an unstable megalomaniac.

  • artizen_121

    What bullshit teabagger/gop site did you find that? Have you people no shame! Honestly, you kids sound like 12 year olds – so go out an play and leave the serious conversations about policy to the grown ups – Please you kids just embarrass yourselves with every keystroke.

  • artizen_121

    What bullshit teabagger/gop site did you find that? Have you people no shame! Honestly, you kids sound like 12 year olds – so go out an play and leave the serious conversations about policy to the grown ups – Please you kids just embarrass yourselves with every keystroke.

  • artizen_121

    America IS on it’s way to being a banana republic kiddo – and if you can’t see that then I guess you were born with a silver spoon up your ass huh. – TRY WORKING FOR A LIVING and maybe you’ll be a little pissed at the corporations and the wealthy who drove this country over a cliff with the help of little boy bush.

  • artizen_121

    You people are sick and twisted and horribly inexcusably misinformed – but hey, just keep watching that fox “news” bullshit you’re all so fond of – have fun in fantasy land.

  • artizen_121

    Ok you stupid little children I’ll use small words so you can understand – The dems could not do much of anything because the gop/teaBAGGERS would alway threaten a filibuster anytime a vote that mattered came up – the dems needed 61 fuking votes to be able to do ANYTHING – and this little ploy the little gop/teaBAGGERS decided to use is shameful and they obviously do not care if this country suffers as long as they can try to blame it on democrats who are trying to help WORKING PEOPLE – I know most of you kids haven’t heard of work – it’s what us real adults do – producing something at the end of the day that benefits society – we aren’t sitting on our fat asses living off of investments.

  • artizen_121

    Well that can’t work because the corporations don’t like paying living wages and most people are living paycheck to paycheck just one health problem, car repair bill, mortgage payment away from utter disaster and these working class americans NEED EVERY DIME THEY EARN in order to live to next week, I know people who live off of investments and don’t really contribute anything to society don’t tend to understand struggling paycheck to paycheck while working your ass off but just try to be empathetic – wage slavery is better for corporate america to exploit the desperate masses.

  • frankie

    Why do conversations always go this route…disappointing.

  • guest

    So you cannot defend your “impeached” comment.  Thanks for the verification!

  • guest

    Wow, you sure showed me:
    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/59331.html
    Oh, I guess you didn’t.

  • guest

    As opposed to your current cellmate?

  • Anonymous

    your manager wants you back at your french fry station you whiny little b*tch…

  • Dflojak

    Because 90% of the people here don’t have a clue, just talking points and hate

  • Anonymous

    and the other moral should be;  let’s stop screwing around with political distortion of the facts and lay them out there so we can deal with them.

  • Dflojak

    Always pointing, never answering the original question, where’s Obama’s plan besides raise taxes on the people that create the jobs. Why don’t people on the left understand this. Anyone remember the luxury tax of the early 90′s. Tax on yachts, cars over 50 k and jewelry. Yacht business went overseas, they had employees drive cars home for a week so they could be sold as used (no luxury tax), and jewelry went to cash to hide from the tax. Net loss of thousands of jobs and no increase in income, actual loss of income.

  • Anonymous

    f*ck the poor, you want them on your team? take em loser…

  • Anonymous

    We the taxpayer do not want a draconian government that soaks up all the money in the economy.

    That’s a great goal. The next step is to find out just where all that money is going. Nobody wants to touch our incredibly bloated military budget in any meaningful way.

    Maybe we need to look at how and why the money has been moving from the poor and middle class to the top few % for a few decades now. I’m all for simplifying the tax code but I’m betting the folks in DC will fight against it because the people that benefit the most are their largest contributors.

  • Dflojak

    And you keep reading the Huff and media matters, and don’t forget the WH talking points as provided by MSLSD.

  • Dflojak

    Maybe the people living off investment income were smart enough to put the money they EARNED into investments that pay for their lifestyle. Oh wait, we have to punish people that make money, pay taxes and save, those dirty bastards. Or maybe Obama can declare them mentally incompetent for not living off the government teet and we can just confiscate their assets, douchebag.

  • Anonymous

    Poor Obamo…poor Brick Obamo. He thought he held the pitchforks and now he sees them pointed at him instead of by him.

    As Libs liked to say while Bush was president, this is ‘All Happening On His Watch.’

  • Anonymous

    Dflojak

    The reason I asked is because Obama did make offers but the mantra that keeps coming back is “That doesn’t count because it wasn’t specific enough”
    Then when the GOP passes Cut Cap and Balance, and praises it as being leaders and wanting to seriously solve problems, guess what, No specifics. Doesn’t that means it doesn’t count?

    As to the rest, are you saying we shouldn’t tax the rich because they are better at gaming the system and avoiding taxes?
    I think the whole” job creators” mantra is misdirection. some small business do file as individuals but the % of potential jobs created that might be affected is much smaller than is being acknowledged and lots of small business are wealthy individuals and small companies such as law firms and investment bankers whose potential hiring is nil.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Ruschak/1383077413 Michael Ruschak

    Hey retardicans. 82 percent of our debt was spent by repukelicans on things like privatizing our military so contractors can get rich. Boner and can’toff voted to raise the debt ceiling 9 times under the chimp without a thought. Where is boners “laserlike focus on jobs”? People remember all the bs you guys spew. And we will remember in the voting booth.

  • Exgoper

    The fringe right desperately needs to delegitimize Obama because, in fact, he’s the only adult in the room. Hence, that’s why they call him a man-child. Typical fright wing tactic.

    I don’t agree with him on every issue and I think as a negotiator he tends to play a weaker hand than he actually holds. But any sane person can see that HE’S the one who’s acting responsibly, has the least hardened position and wants what’s best for the country, even if it means putting his reelection at risk. 

    That the Republicans are truly prepared to burn the house down to get what they want reveals that they’re the ones who are the petulant children, not the president. 

  • Exgoper

    Too bad most Americans couldn’t explain “cut cap and balance” to you. 

    Most Americans — by wide margins — favored the details of the Healthcare Reform plan, too, but because the GOP had tainted the process, HCR itself was unpopular, even though the specifics were not. 

    It’s all about messaging. Unfortunately, the Republican party — and their stooges at Fox News — have become masters of the scare tactic.

  • gordonbloyershow

    Obama is openly lying. Amazing.

    If the government could create jobs there would never be any unemployment.

  • Ted Joy

    Would it, then, be class warfare if Obama were to come out and say, hey, fellows, you know what, every study that’s been done for the past hundred years shows that the folks in the lower 10 per cent of incomes produce about 80 per cent of our problems with alcoholism and drugs, they commit about 90 per cent of our violent crimes and more than that of our property crimes, their children disrupt our schools turning them into cesspools of filth, violence, sexual misbehavior and lack of learning, they are involved in most of our traffic accidents, they destroy whatever public facilities exist in their neighborhoods, turn the homes they live in into sties, produce most of the children — and adults — with mental problems and low intelligence and then have absolutely no parenting skills or concerns.  Well, my fellow Americans, (Obama would go on to say), it’s about time we did something so that these folks would contribute their fair share to our nation. 

    Would that be class warfare?  And how would it be any different than going after the folks in the top ten per cent of the income brackets.

    I suspect that going after the top ten per cent isn’t class warfare and going after the bottom ten per cent is class warfare is due to the simple fact that most libs are envious of the folks at the top of the income bracket and want what they have whereas there’s no way in hell that they would want to change places with the folks at the bottom.

  • Anonymous

    You think making statements like “they stand for the rich over the poor” is a good debate question?
    Absolute nonsense such as that statement indicates you are ill equipped to have a debate with anyone other than your cat.

  • Anonymous

    Once again, a nonsensical response with no debating skills.  Perhaps once your graduate we can expect more, but I’m not holding my breath.  

  • Anonymous

    King of the Red Necks? LOL. You must be over 50. I haven’t heard that term used since the seventies.  He is more of an cubicle dwelling suit who never worked an honest days work. I assure you, he is not a “Red Neck”…

  • Ted Joy

    I don’t get your point.  Matter of fact, the last three or four lines of your post are incoherent.

    Are you saying that people shouldn’t be allowed to live off investments?  In that case, if you have a pension of any sort then you’ll have to give that up.Or are you saying that folks shouldn’t have to live from paycheck-to-paycheck?  Well, yeah, I agree it would be nice not to live paycheck to paycheck and if I were willing to give up some of the small luxuries in my life I could.  But that’s a matter of what would be nice not what’s a moral imperative. 

    And, one other thing, if folks weren’t living paycheck-to-paycheck, what should they do with the extra money?  Invest  it, probably?  And live off those investments? 

    One other thing, most of the folks I know who have a considerable income from investments put a lot more back into society than most of the folks I know who don’t.  The only middle- and low-income people I know who do a lot for their fellow citizens are the church-going conservative ones.

  • B9johnson

    What this country needs is more tax cuts for the rich and less benefits for main street. Main street doesn’t deserve the entitlement welfare checks! We should tax poor people more! They have x-boxes! Outrageous! If they can afford to buy games, they can afford to pay more taxes! Rich people are paying too much. Go Boehner!

  • Greg

    And if medical research could produce vaccines then no one would ever get sick.

  • http://games-survival.com Justplaythegame

    Bitch Bitch bitch, all about a credit rating.. well guess what, when you don’t have money you shouldn’t have a great credit rating. CREDIT RATING: Score to allow you to BORROW even more money!!

    When will D.C. understand the American people are tired of our country BORROWING money!

    Who cares about the damn Credit Score if your not paying your bills anyway!
    Welcome to the real world every American lives under! You can’t keep spending and paying Interest!!

    how does that work in the “real” world? You end up living off what you actually earn!
    it’s about time Washington understands you must live within your means!

    It’s not the end of the world..it’s the end of Washington D. C. from BORROWING!!!

  • Anonymous

    How many more people has Obama, his Czar’s and administration put out of work this week.

    The is the only number in Washingtion that gets higher every week.

  • Anonymous

    You will pay cash for your next car? You (or your son or daughter) will buy a house without a loan?
    Corporations borrow even when they have enough cash to buy. The way that works is the money they have in the bank earns interest, while the money they borrow is at only slightly higher interest. The interest spread between what is earned and what is owed is the best deal. Plus, the interest paid is a tax deduction. That is one way corporations pay ridiculously low taxes.
    One reason the debt interest cost is low is the fact that the cash is collateral.
    All of that gets turned upside down when borrowing costs more for everybody.
    This is another reason why corporations will not let Republicans cause a default.

    As soon as they know there will be no more accounting tricks for the government to pull, the Republicans will fold and the debt limit will go up.

  • Anonymous

    You will pay cash for your next car? You (or your son or daughter) will buy a house without a loan?
    Corporations borrow even when they have enough cash to buy. The way that works is the money they have in the bank earns interest, while the money they borrow is at only slightly higher interest. The interest spread between what is earned and what is owed is the best deal. Plus, the interest paid is a tax deduction. That is one way corporations pay ridiculously low taxes.
    One reason the debt interest cost is low is the fact that the cash is collateral.
    All of that gets turned upside down when borrowing costs more for everybody.
    This is another reason why corporations will not let Republicans cause a default.

    As soon as they know there will be no more accounting tricks for the government to pull, the Republicans will fold and the debt limit will go up.

  • Anonymous

    All governments create jobs. President is a job. Senator and Representative are jobs. Military jobs. Administrative jobs. Hitler got Germany out of depression by creating jobs, and they weren’t all military jobs. (Hitler blew it in other ways, but he did know how to super-charge the German economy.) Greece created too many government jobs. A balance is necessary.

    A good government created job is making roads by hiring private contractors to do the work. The contractors hire the workers and buy or rent the equipment. The roads then serve public needs. That is how government creates jobs, but the Republicans won’t let it get done.
     

  • http://games-survival.com Justplaythegame

    your not guaranteed credit in America.. you earn it. You don’t just pay your interest and get another card, you pay it off. Obviously we have allowed Banks and institutions rape the American people on Interest rates. It’s the Americans fault here. How do you solve this? Quit Borrowing!! The rates will come down if they don’t have “Idiots” getting and accepting these loans they cannot afford.

    You should not be living outside your means. Sure get a loan on a car under rates you can afford for your means and record. Can’t afford that Continental but you can get the F150..then buy the F150.. save for the Continental. Can’t afford that Million dollar home you want..then buy that nice little ranch home and save and put equity into your home. Homes are not meant to be turned into a quick flip cash cow, they are meant to be lived in. OUR government has no credibility to lendors, they just pay interest and continue to spend. Enough is enough.

  • Anonymous

    Foul language does not convince.

  • Anonymous

    Suggestion. Any foul use of foul language deserves only one comment. Click on Reply and type: “Foul Language.” Click on Post as …
    Do not click Like on the Foul Language comment. Add your own Foul Language reply.
    It might work. 

  • Anonymous

    You mean how many government jobs, which are jobs after all, have the Republicans destroyed?
    Even if you assume that a particular government job can be done without, you have to recognize that the employee who got laid off is now competing with the rest of the jobless, and there is one less job available.
    Joblessness gets worse, not better, even if the long term effect is good.

  • Socratease

    Wait, that’s not fair, no one has even produced a budget for the Dems in like 700 days or something ridiculous like that. 

  • Anonymous

    I am in absolute agreement on your basic statement that the key is self-control. Unfortunately, if the government defaults, interest rates will probably go so high that “you” can’t afford to borrow for the F150, either. My point is that what was affordable before won’t be affordable after.
    On the corporate scale, it could tip the decision to not upgrading or adding to capability, and that would make even more sense because a default by the government will not in any way CREATE JOBS! (Sorry for the caps. Would prefer some other way of emphasizing.)

    What we really, really need to look at is what effect would a government default have on jobs, and I think the answer is clear. It would destroy many jobs.

  • Anonymous

    Unfortunately, many local governments are also spending out of control, “improving” roads and buildings instead of maintaining so that they can justify big contracts to their private corporate contractor buddies. Unfortunately, the government doesn’t promote fair competition, it guarantees the side that pays it the most money and favors the win, and it only has itself to hold it accountable. This makes me less inclined to put more money into the government coffers. Almost no one trusts politicians, why trust the organization comprised of them?

    And president, senator and representative are jobs created for the government, not by it.

  • http://games-survival.com Justplaythegame

    What we really, really need to look at is what effect would a government default have on jobs, and I think the answer is clear. It would destroy many jobs.

    I think from our Government learning they cannot keep spending and keep Foreign countries in their pocket and interest and quit wasting OUR money overseas, they might see how all these “American?” companies, now with factories based off shore and importing back into the American economy may find out it would be cheaper to have those jobs here if they gained more taxes from imports to balance an even trade. So much coulda woulda shoulda to happen.. what we need is change to make it happen and see the outcome.. obviously we see what the present brings.

  • Anonymous

    The only problem with your scenario is that the price of goods isn’t fixed. If interest rates go up on F-150s and no one can afford them, Ford will have to drop the price of it’s F-150. It balances out, because chances are that they raised the price when loans were easy to obtain. A truer measure of this would be the housing market. Home prices skyrocketed, loans were very easy to obtain, fannie & freddie became an easy way for banks to dump bad debt and banking regulations were relaxed in the sub-prime market. These things all happened more or less simultaneously and the justification given by the government was that it was needed because it’s only right that more people with less money be able to afford homes and renting was somehow inhumane. All these changes happen and it’s supposedly coincidence. The only positive result of these changes is that the property value of owned homes has to increase in order to justify new home prices.
    We all know how the next part goes, the bubble artificially created and maintained by the government (I attribute this all to the government because no part of the scenario is feasible without the government deregulation and other legislation that preceded it) bursts because people couldn’t afford the homes they bought. We all know that banks never would have lent the money in such large quantities to such bad risks if they knew they would be left on the hook for it. Luckily, they could sell that bad debt to fannie & freddie (private entities that in turn deferred all the risk onto the government by government design). After the inevitable crash (that many economists that are still considered prominent never foresaw), the government foots almost the whole bill. Home prices barely fall, lending practices and standards only really get changed on refinances, corporations are bailed out, fannie & freddie are given blank checks to buy bad debt, home credits are paid by the government to keep people buying new homes. Oh, and property values on owned homes plummet, making it almost impossible for people to sell their too expensive homes and break even. What should have happened is that new home prices should have plummeted as well, but they barely dropped because the government propped them up.

    And this isn’t an argument for default, just an example of how I believe it’s all the government’s fault that we’re in this mess yet they continue to exacerbate the problem and keep the economy from truly recovering.

  • caconservative

    The only group Obimbo is looking out for are the “entitlement-parasites” who make up the voting base of the Democratic Party.

  • Republicans are Liars

    The Republican Party and its Tea Party wing are going to destroy the American economic system as we know it. These Tea Party people are exactly the same kind demographic that was drawn to National Socialism. (Please for those with weak intellects don’t get wound up over the term socialism. In this case it has nothing to do with left leanings.) Tea Party followers are economically disenfranchised. They are individuals trying to find some group or organization they can be a apart of which they feel gives them some type of power and dignity. The Tea Party people are easily manipulated by their leaders for the leaders speak to them in glittering generalities they can easily grasp. Except for the leadership, the rank and file of the Tea Party lack advanced educations and are more than likely to be students who ranked in the middle to lower part of their academic classes. Tea Party people are more than likely more religious than most. Again they find comfort in ideology that excuses how their life is in reality with a promise of a better life to come. All-in-all these misinformed individuals will listen to their leaders, who are truly master manipulators for big business. These leaders will shape a message that resonates supremacy of white, anglo-saxon protestants which resonates with the rank and file Tea Party person. However, it is truly a message which allows the corporate oligarchy to cling to its power.

  • Republicans are Liars

    The Republican Party and its Tea Party wing are going to destroy the American economic system as we know it. These Tea Party people are exactly the same kind demographic that was drawn to National Socialism. (Please for those with weak intellects don’t get wound up over the term socialism. In this case it has nothing to do with left leanings.) Tea Party followers are economically disenfranchised. They are individuals trying to find some group or organization they can be a apart of which they feel gives them some type of power and dignity. The Tea Party people are easily manipulated by their leaders for the leaders speak to them in glittering generalities they can easily grasp. Except for the leadership, the rank and file of the Tea Party lack advanced educations and are more than likely to be students who ranked in the middle to lower part of their academic classes. Tea Party people are more than likely more religious than most. Again they find comfort in ideology that excuses how their life is in reality with a promise of a better life to come. All-in-all these misinformed individuals will listen to their leaders, who are truly master manipulators for big business. These leaders will shape a message that resonates supremacy of white, anglo-saxon protestants which resonates with the rank and file Tea Party person. However, it is truly a message which allows the corporate oligarchy to cling to its power.

  • Morgan_Said

    I’m surprised no one has figured out what the Republicans are really trying to do. THEY WANT TO RAISE TAXES ON THE UNEMPLOYED! That way they can bring a lot more money into the Treasury.

    Of course, the only way that could happen would be to get them jobs–which I guess they would rather have anyway.

  • PabIo

    That’s a lovely fantasy you’ve spun for yourself. Enjoy it while you can.

  • Anonymous

    You make solid economic arguments. I definitely respect them. As the saying goes, economists can’t agree on anything, so I respectfully disagree on only minor points.

    There does come a point when Ford can not bring the price any lower, and that stops the whole process, just like when the consumer runs out of credit. Full stop. (Note here: the current debt limit is an artificial limit in that it is imposed by politicians, not the banks. More on that at the end of this post.)

    I absolutely agree that the government went overboard on “the American Dream” of home ownership, and that is not the fault of a single political party. In fact, it is probably more the fault of the entire housing industry and its lobby, from the contractors who built houses to the Real Estate agents (they insist on the capital R and E), to the mortgage lenders who knowingly made bad loans (not forced to, wanted to) because they could bundle them and pass them on. Countrywide and other mortgage-only companies knew they were making bad loans but would not be stuck with them because they could sell them to banks who didn’t bother to evaluate them.

    All kinds of people make a living off of fees and commissions when a house is sold. Mortgage salespersons get commissions for convincing people to borrow, and once they got the commission there was no penalty to the salesman if the borrower defaulted. His boss didn’t care because his boss sold the mortgage to an unsuspecting bank so he and the salesman were protected. The temptation to lie about the borrower’s credit, even when the borrower was not willing to, was too great for the salesperson to ignore.

    Did you see that Bank of America paid heavy fines and penalties for bait-and-switch mortgage interest rates?
     
    In short, most or all of the corruption did not exist withing the
    government. The problem was that the government did not monitor or even
    spot-check what was going on. It is no wonder the economists were caught
    by surprise, since nobody was telling them just how corrupt the system
    had become.

    Back to the self-imposed government spending limit. The current situation works out to be just like this:
    (Good Guy scenario first)

    My wife and I agree that we won’t borrow any more, no matter what. My car breaks down and I can’t afford to get it fixed, so I use the credit card. My wife is angry, but agrees it was necessary. Debt limit raised, and we will have to give up something else for a while to get back in financial shape.

    Bad Guy scenario: I break the credit limit to buy a 52″ 3-D TV on a store brand credit card. Wife won’t pay the bill. She is morally correct, but the store will repossess and our credit is ruined, to boot.

    Are we in a Good Guy scenario or a Bad Guy scenario? Let’s fix the problem first, and argue about who is evil later.

  • Anonymous

    Lmao. You are throwing out so much crap here. I hope it makes you feel better. You can easily swap Tea Party with Democrat and no one would be able to tell the difference with all the baseless claims you’ve made.

    Tea Party followers are economically disenfranchised.

    Unlike the poor that are supposedly championed by the Democratic Party?

    They are individuals trying to find some group or organization they can
    be a apart of which they feel gives them some type of power and dignity.
    The Tea Party people are easily manipulated by their leaders for the
    leaders speak to them in glittering generalities they can easily grasp.

    And this is completely different from Dems & Repubs as a whole? The glittering generalities in your post about the Tea Party is enough to prove my point. See:

    Except for the leadership, the rank and file of the Tea Party lack
    advanced educations and are more than likely to be students who ranked
    in the middle to lower part of their academic classes.

    Tea Party people are more than likely more religious than most. Again
    they find comfort in ideology that excuses how their life is in reality
    with a promise of a better life to come.

    And progressives find comfort in a ideology that excuses what they’ve made of their lives in reality with a promise that those who have earned more have to give their earnings to those who haven’t. Somehow progressives think they can argue there is no God and that progressivism is in keeping with Jesus’ teachings without any conflict. Newsflash, divorcing ideology from the concept of the divine doesn’t make your ideology for correct or valid. It just makes it a different ideology. You just believe in taxing instead of tithing.

    All-in-all these misinformed individuals will listen to their leaders,
    who are truly master manipulators for big business. These leaders will
    shape a message that resonates supremacy of white, anglo-saxon
    protestants which resonates with the rank and file Tea Party person.
    However, it is truly a message which allows the corporate oligarchy to
    cling to its power.

    Every major bill passed by Obama and the Democrat-run congress has directly benefited the corporate oligarchy. None of it has improved the economy. Your leaders have shaped a message that resonates with the feelings of self-hatred of the white, anglo-saxon
    protestant-raised people which form the rank and file of the Democratic ranks. You know those same people who disparage Tea Party members for being mostly religious without realizing that same charge applies to almost all of the minority groups they claim to challenge. That’s not surprising to me, though. I don’t think most Democrats like you think you’re the same as the minorities. They’re pet projects you champion because of your strong moral fiber. The same type of person probably thinks “I’m so evolved because I voted for one of them!” and “Some of my best friends are Black!”. Of course, if you happen to be a minority and still spew this tripe, that just makes you amazingly thick-headed for failing to see the hypocrisy in your post. I guess your leaders should be commended for doing such an awesome job with their glittering generalities.

  • http://games-survival.com Justplaythegame

    From what I seen in the last 20 years or longer our economy is already destroyed..
    we push credit cards like candy.. our whole system has no values..
    Nothing more than a Debt and Credit society..not work and save.
    You get what you breed.. You want more? ask for a raise!
    Start a company or quit letting the rich get richer off your back. You know you can speak up right?
    As a nation founded on freedom and self preservation we have led America into “debt and demand’ of rights? supplied Freely? from Government? I don’t want a damn thing from the Government. They want to cut SS and medicare fine, Quit taking it out of the checks and Just give me every penny I paid in tax free with interest over the years and I will be on my way. Can’t hold up to your commitments to the people, fine, Just pay me back make a flat tax for everyone and leave me alone. More could be done for the poverish in the private sector than Government could ever do. I say Bullshit, let it fall and get it’s house back in order. pathetic from BOTH PARTIES!!

    And take those damn invasion of privacy over paid and over priced sections of government out of my FREE Society! Enough is enough!! TSA and Homeland security be damned!! There’s a nice tax cut for ya!!

    “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” – Benjamin Franklin

  • Anonymous

    What’s fantasy are the jobs the Republican Tea Baggers promised. What is reality are 13 abortion bills and coming close to throwing the nation into the Second Great Depression. Oh, and protecting the filthy rich “job creators” when they haven’t produced any damn jobs, but then again there have been no jobs bills because all the House can produce are abortion bills and Republican governors produce abortion bills AND anti-union bills! It’s a *wonderful* platform for right-wingers to run on. I’m sure you’ll be successful with it ;-)

  • Morgan_Said

    This is the standard grudge of not wanting someone to make a profit off of someone else’s labor. Well, it they are manufacturing a product, it’s going to take a lot of laborers to skim off enough profit and remain competitive. That says the Leech is going to have to hire a lot of laborers to make it worthwhile. The last time I looked, that was creating jobs!
     
    The alternative is for everyone to make and sell trinkets–talk about competition and a rat race.

  • Anonymous

    There does come a point when Ford can not bring the price any lower, and
    that stops the whole process, just like when the consumer runs out of
    credit. Full stop.

    It stops the whole process of buying a new car with ford. Maybe you end up with more Kias on the streets or more people buying used instead of new. Neither one of these things hurts the economy as a whole, even if it’s not so great for Ford.

    I absolutely agree that the government went overboard on “the American
    Dream” of home ownership, and that is not the fault of a single
    political party. In fact, it is probably more the fault of the entire
    housing industry and its lobby, etc.

    None of the things you talk about here would have happened without the government enabling it. The domino that starts everything else is the government creating the situation with fannie & freddie so that every institution knows bad debt can eventually be paid by the taxpayer. Otherwise, no smart bank every takes the risk that they may be stuck with the hot potato. I don’t believe for a second that politicians in both parties and economists didn’t know that going in. I’m not saying that only the government was corrupt. I’m saying that the government is complicit and was required for everything else to work. It had to knowingly create the opportunity. Unless you believe it was a randomly created perfect storm.

    I am a proponent of a self-imposed balanced budget. That’s the only way to ensure that scenario B never happens (again) and it’s the only way you can realistically create an environment for scenario A to be successful. There had to be a point before scenario A where the couple realized that they were borrowing too much and decided to be more responsible. So requiring that the budget be made and balanced every year is the first step to fixing the problem.

    For scenario B, ruined credit is the best thing that can happen to someone whose spending is out of control. The rub comes in figuring out what is going to be repossessed, so of course the debt ceiling should be raised. Btu has the government done a good job of taking care of other problems (like spending) later? Obama insisted in that press conference that the ceiling much be raised now through the next election cycle. If that’s not trying to avoid having to deal with the bigger issue, then I don’t know what is.

  • Anonymous

    Obama is such a tool. I can’t stand listening to his out right likes and distortions anymore. The only thing he knows is class warfare and scare tactic rhetoric.

  • Anonymous

    A healthy cynicism is essential, but in my opinion, you go way overboard. Just remember that so long as you live in a civilized world, there will be a government, so you had better keep an eye on it if you can. If you believe your government is corrupt at all levels, start with the local level.

    Don’t just blindly accuse. Investigate. You have the power and the responsibility to do that.

  • Anonymous

    The debt problem has been growing for years.  It’s been greatly exacerbated by the current administration. 

    To hear blame from so many on the left cast on to the “Tea Party” is with little merit  That group has been around for only a few years.  If anything, it’s a reaction to the expanding debt problem. 

    But, it’s easier to cast blame and name call then it is to deal with the problem, and Obama is all about pointing a finger (yes, that finger) at someone or some group to deflect his own failure to even address the many problems of this nation.

    Obama is in over his head; problem is, we’re all drowning with him as he “sinks” the nation.

  • Dart Rt

    The NLRB is stocked with Obama appointees and take their orders from him. The NLRB has kept Boeing from opening it’s new 1 billion dollar plant in N. Charleston effectly keeping Boeing from hiring 1,000 new employees. And how about the shovel ready jobs that were supposed to be funded, never happened. Where did that money go ?  Obama is smiling as he picks your pockets. He won’t secure the borders and prosecutes those states that try to. Bush spent 7 trillion in 8 years, Obama spent 4 1/2  trillion in 2 1/2  years and wants another 2 1/2 trillion. So Obama will spend in 2 1/2 years what Bush spent in 8. It almost seems like Bush was a real bargain.   

  • Anonymous

    The HOUSE has done it’s job – several times, in fact – in passing legislation to solve the BIG GOVERNMENT debt and spending problem. But the d-cRAT socialist controlled senate and WH REFUSE to do anything constructive or specific. THERE IS STILL NO PLAN FROM OBOZO – just his usual vague platitudes and BS !!!!!!

    Cut, Cap and Balance remains as the only REAL solution to America’s BIG GOVERNMENT spending and debt problem, which is why it was passed by the HOUSE with bi-partisan support.
    Cut, Cap and Balance is to a lunatic-left d-cRAT socialist’s cherished BIG GOVERNMENT as a wooden stake is to a vampire.

    The irresponsible defeat of Cut, Cap and Balance by the Senate d-cRAT socialists shows, once again, that these lunatic-left extremists want only to SPEND, SPEND, SPEND and TAX, TAX, TAX America into another high-tax, low-growth, no jobs, failed socialist entitlement state like Greece.

    One can be certain that “YOU LIE!” obozo will do the worst possible things to inflict a petulant, spiteful, petty, mean-spirited revenge against those who won’t give him his beloved MASSIVE JOB-KILLING and ECONOMIC-GROWTH-STIFFLING TAX INCREASES, like stopping payments to the elderly, the poor and the sick and even defaulting on the debt – all without any real need to do so. Why? Because, as leftist TOOL mark halperin so aptly described him, he’s a “D-I-*-K”. I feel sorry for Speaker Boehner who has to try get this sanctimonious, demagogic, self-righteous and arrogant clown to do something constructive and beneficial for the country, which is clearly a thankless and horrifically difficult task.

  • Rogan

    Knee-jerk partisans tend to make one or more of the following assumptions:

    1. Since I’m a knee-jerk partisan, everyone else must be one, too.

    2. Since I believe whatever I believe, anyone who doesn’t believe it must have “drunk the kool-aid” of the “other side.”

    3. Since I see myself as a reasonable and reasoning person, anyone who disagrees with me must be unreasonable or unreasoning.

    4. Anyone who claims to have arrived at a different position than my own through a reasoned process is lying.

    5. People who disagree with me do so because they are either stupid or duplicitous.

  • Anonymous

    How do you create the box around the quote? I want to do that.

    “I’m saying that the government is complicit and was required for
    everything else to work. It had to knowingly create the opportunity.
    Unless you believe it was a randomly created perfect storm.”

    There have been many random perfect storms commonly known as economic bubbles that had nothing to do with government interference. this has happened throughout history. There was even a time when a single tulip bulb would cost thousands of dollars (equivalent) in Holland in 1593. http://www.investopedia.com/features/crashes/crashes2.asp

    People need to be aware that governments actually have far LESS control over basic economic conditions than is commonly believed. Geography and nature make many decisions for us. Technology makes it possible to import things cheaply and deliver them quickly over vast distances. It would not matter that a Chinese worker can make a computer more cheaply than an American can if the transportation of that computer doubled the price and took three months to deliver. Did “government” create the cargo plane and know it would change where computers were made?

    Mostly governments scramble to keep up with a changing world, not the other way around. When the politicians refuse to scramble, everybody falls behind.

  • Anonymous

    Please see my reply to atreyue, above. I combine some ideas for both of you. And, I continue to say this is good debate. Thanks.

  • Anonymous

    And if I changed Obama to McConnell or Cantor?

  • Anonymous

    Since you seem to believe that the tax cuts are “job killers”, just where are all those JOBS that resulted from the 3 huge tax cuts for the rich that Bush did?

    If they are anywhere, they are in China.  Because they sure as hell aren’t here.  The tax cuts have been in place for 10 fricking years and we don’t have an increase in jobs.

    On the other hand, Clinton RAISED taxes and created 23 Million jobs.

    Think about it weirdos.  You don’t have any common sense and too much allegiance to the tea party and self-destructing GOP.

  • Anonymous

    hmtl tag blockquote, /blockquote

    perfect storms can randomly happen. But this was not one such event. You acknowledge that it’s the fault of the housing industry and its lobby. I’m sure we would both agree that the lobby makes the first move by begging the government to make changes in order to create the environment that would allow the housing industry to pull off the scheme. I’m simply asserting that I don’t believe that the politicians were unwitting pawns or even that they’re greedy and didn’t know what the result would be. I think they were fully complicit, deregulating to start the ball rolling and making sure fannie & freddie would be there (in addition to the more commonly recognized bailouts) as a backstop when it all fell apart, which they knew was inevitable.

    And I agree, government has little control over basic economic conditions. But the U.S. government has asserted control over the more complicated ones through regulation. Thus, the government can regulate the use of cargo planes and set taxes on them, while making cargo trains and trucking more attractive through the same means. Pretending that they are just trying to play catch up and are not in point of fact the architects of the economic situation is one of their most effective tools. If it was so hard for the government to affect the economy, then the stimulus bill would have been a huge waste of money, from the get-go since it’s all a crap shoot. So would cash for clunkers, the new homebuyers credit, etc. So either the government is stupid to not realize that their intervention can be useless or the government knows exactly what the outcome of their intervention will be. I submit it’s the second and the reason why is simple. No matter which party is in power, every decision leads to the same corporations raking in huge profits. If it really were a crap shoot, it wouldn’t always have the same result.

  • Etnrk

    ‘fright wing’.  I LOVE that.  So appropriate.  Thanks, hope you don’t mind if I use it…

  • Etnrk

    ‘fright wing’.  I LOVE that.  So appropriate.  Thanks, hope you don’t mind if I use it…

  • SteveCan

    Was that a KOS poll or one fro MSDNC?

  • SteveCan

    “What does the debt ceiling have to do with spending?”

    Economics 101.

  • SteveCan

    “What does the debt ceiling have to do with spending?”

    Economics 101.

  • http://games-survival.com Justplaythegame

    The NLRB has kept Boeing from opening it’s new 1 billion dollar plant in N. Charleston effectly keeping Boeing from hiring 1,000 new employees.

    Umm your forgeting the 1000 that would be laid off in their current plant. it’s called union busting. google it, shouldn’t be that far reaching for you.

    the rest of your story…im right there drooling with ya..

  • Anonymous

    I suggest that many “Government jobs that were created  the Obama Administration’s policies are NOT jobs “after all.”

    When does the job become a form of welfare?  Answer: When it cost more money to create the job, than the Jobs merit.

    That is the theory and beauty of Capitalism and free enterprise.  Properly applied, without political baggage as a hindrance, “trickle economics” and the “Laffer Curve” are peerless.  

    Unless, of course, you’d prefer a Politburo?  Then theory and philosophy are meaningless.

    PURVEYOR OF RHETORIC 

  • Etnrk

    When I read idiotic responses like this, I’m SOOOO glad I’m on the side of the debate that uses independent research, rational thought and facts in making conclusions and presenting arguments.  For those who are incapable of that, there is Foxnews to tell you what to think…  And remember their repeated mantra, and I paraphrase: don’t listen to, watch or read from any other media or resources because they are all ‘liberal biased’!  That should be the first red flag that Fox and conservative media are just propagandist institutions wouldn’t you think?

  • Anonymous

    Did anyone else find it ironic that man who penned the song “Revolution” was in a White House comprised of revolutionaries?

    “You say you want a Revolution, well ya know, 

    when you go talkin about destruction, 

    Don’t ya know that you can count me out.”

    LOL,  Ouch!

  • Anonymous

    Sounds more like a pathology: “Paranoid delusional”…  Ouch!

  • http://games-survival.com Justplaythegame

    have to give it to ya gurl… right on the money about tax cuts..

    the rich have the lowest tax they have had in a long long time.. no jobs to show..why? let’s look back at God old mighty REAGAN halo be his name. This free trade bullshit that opened the borders to Foreign countries bringing in products without fair taxation on those products to equal the American economy. “American?” Companies exploiting this and moving the jobs offshore! While you praise God old mighty REAGAN halo be his name for the money raked in with debt high as hell, hand over fist “at” first… reap the benefits it has brought to our shores..Im sure Big Business has and continues to.

  • Etnrk

    I’m no bible thumper, but your words would have made Jesus cry…  You are one sick puppy…

  • Anonymous

    html tag blockquote, So either the government is stupid to not realize that their
    intervention can be useless or the government knows exactly what the
    outcome of their intervention will be /blockquote

     I have told my two sons as one of the primary lessons of life:

    What looks like evil in this world is most often nothing more than gross stupidity. It is the rule of unintended consequences. That especially applies to governments. I am sure we can all agree that politicians can be stupid.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NFZ2ZUNCTTU43MXBWF22T3TQUU Chip

    Try reading a book called ‘Man child in the Promised Land’. That should clear things up a bit for ya.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NFZ2ZUNCTTU43MXBWF22T3TQUU Chip

    The country became divided the second Obama decided to run for president. He had little to do with it. You immediately wanted your country back… from whom???

  • Etnrk

    I too despise the ridiculous right wing assault on English grammar and campaign to change the established and proper name of the Democratic Party…  The only good thing, is when you hear someone say Democrat Party, or democrat bill etc, you can instantly and safely assume their ‘talking point’ based argument and agenda.

  • Anonymous

    “And progressives find comfort in a ideology that excuses what they’ve made of their lives”

    What exactly have “they” made of their lives that they need excuses for?  All the wealthy states are blue.  All the poor states, red.  Now tell me, what have they made of their lives that they need excuses for?

  • Etnrk

    Another good one!  The effects of the teabagger movement in Congress surely can be likened to terrorism.

  • Anonymous

    what are you talking about?  You racist bigot!  

  • Anonymous

    I don’t know where you get your data, but it is so far off it is funny.  Clinton not only left a budget surplus when he left office, but he was able to dwindle some off the national debt left by Reagan and Bush sr.  The national debt when Bush took office was $5.6 Trillion.  When he left office, it was $10.7 Trillion PLUS he had saddled the incoming administration with a $1.3 Trillion in debt from the bailouts etc, PLUS he had encumbered them to pay for the Medicare Part D, 2 wars and exttreme tax cuts.  Don’t forget – he didn’t include the 2 wars in any of his budget not to mention the HUGE INTEREST his tax cuts and debt put on the backs of future generations.
    So in all honesty, he left us owing a minimum of $12.5 Trillion when he left office.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t you find it rather strange that there was no complaint from the Tea Party when Bush and his republican congress were spending like drunk sailors?

  • Anonymous

    That’s okay – they won’t have any bridges or roads that are decent to drive that F`150 on anyway.  So, you think you will fly instead?  think again.  The air traffic controllers will be one of the first jobs furloughed as will all those security people at the airport.

    You want less government?  Well, the less will be NONE.

    So, what is the difference between a democracy and a fascist government?  In a democracy, they compromise.  A fascist isn’t willing to compromise. 

  • Anonymous

    Maybe you need to check out history as to Fannie and freddie.  They were doing just fine until May 17,2002 when George W Bush made a deal with them to lower their lending standards to allow “buyers with bad credit or no down payment” to purchase a home.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sc4KprmcYnU

  • Anonymous

    So what you’re saying is that there are no poor progressives? If all the wealth is concentrated in a very few, then that would mean that the majority of people in wealthy states are democrat? Each person only gets one vote, no matter how wealthy they are. Those states being blue would seem to indicate that the not wealthy want more of a cut of the money when they get to see the fruits of it. Or did I miss something?

  • Anonymous

    So what you’re saying is that there are no poor progressives? If all the wealth is concentrated in a very few, then that would mean that the majority of people in wealthy states are democrat? Each person only gets one vote, no matter how wealthy they are. Those states being blue would seem to indicate that the not wealthy want more of a cut of the money when they get to see the fruits of it. Or did I miss something?

  • Anonymous

    the Tea party didn’t exist. Unfortunately, people usually only start to pay attention when things get really bad. Hopefully they don’t stop once a republican gets elected. You know, kinda like so many democrats raging over Bush’s wars and Guantanamo stopped once Obama got in office…

  • Anonymous

    Not totally true, check history…it was the large spending at the end of the Bush era that helped to create the Tea Party.  As I said, the record spending of Bush has been well surpased by the Obama administration and even more so when “Nancy” and “Harry” were in charge of both houses of the congress even before and after Obama came into office.  The last congresional election altered that with the GOP taking the House.

    There were “complaint[s]” about Bush’s spending in the early stages (still are) from many in the almost three-year-old Tea Party, also it really is not a political party it the truest sense.

  • Anonymous

    Right. Because so many bridges and roads are in disrepair. Someone should check and see what the local governments with those problems are actually spending their money on instead. When I see someone who’s losing their home to foreclosure because they can’t pay their mortgage and they’ve got flat panel TVs, full cable & internet and a car purchased new in the last 5 model years, I don’t feel so bad for them anymore. Not to mention the fact that they shouldn’t be stupid enough to buy something they can’t realistically afford just because someone was willing to loan them the money for it. I don’t look at that person and say “Oh, the evil banks!” They should be responsible for their own budgeting and accept the consequences of their mistakes. Does that mean I think the government shouldn’t exist or have no money? No. But they should always be held accountable, not just on your partisan schedule.

  • Anonymous

    The point I want to make is that equally qualified economists can and do
    recommend totally opposite solutions to social problems and never be
    certain about the result until 18 months later. It is a well known
    principle of economics called a J curve. And, then the economists will
    argue about whether government should have done more or less to get a
    better result.

    I never mentioned economists because they pretend to be a science yet can’t accurately predict the market, only attempt to explain what happened after the fact, as you said. Do you think that the lobbyists and the housing industry knew what the outcome of what they were lobbying for would be? Or what they would do once their lobby was successful. I do. I don’t think it was an unintended result. So I’m trying to figure out where you think the stupidity started, with the housing industry or the politicians. Because I’m having real trouble seeing the stupidity of the whole thing, since all the complicit parties got away with it. Bush served all 8 years, the people behind fannie & freddie in congress are still there for the most part, only Chris Dodd was scapegoated, and that wasn’t only for this, the corporations got bailed out and continue to get bailed out by fannie & freddie, who got blank checks from the government. Those are all the most fortuitous coincidences ever. And I just can’t believe that the same politicians who are geniuses when they are doing what we want are just stupid when they do what we don’t. At what point do we consider that just maybe they’re dishonest? Do you think that you would have been able to reasonably predict what was going to happen if you we aware of the things the lobby was asking for?

  • Anonymous

    Maybe you need to check out history as to Fannie and freddie.  They were
    doing just fine until May 17,2002 when George W Bush made a deal with
    them to lower their lending standards to allow “buyers with bad credit
    or no down payment” to purchase a home.

    Maybe you need to check out history as to my posts just here in this topic and find where I say “Democrats bad, Republicans good!” If you want to play partisan games, play with yourself. Just one question: what did Bush do? Sounds from your clip like he made a propsal to congress that congress passed. The executive can’t make laws or give fanny & freddie money or make fanny & freddie do what he wants. That’s under congress’ jurisdiction. Should Bush share in the blame? Of course. Should everyone else who signed off on it or gave fanny & freddie additional funds in after 9/17/2002? Yes. Does this have anything to do with what we’re talking about? No. Thanks for playing.

  • Anonymous

    Unfortunately, I don’t have the time to investigate all over the country, I can only speak to the places I’ve lived, where this is true. I urge you to investigate in your area and those near you to see which is true. If your local government shows these same signs of corruption, vote them out. You also have the power and responsibility to investigate instead of blindly accepting.

  • Anonymous

    This is a long thread and getting jumbled. I will try to cover several items.

    Sorry for any implication that you are liberal or conservative. That was a one-time failure to use the full phrase “conservative or liberal,” as I usually do.

    It is my opinion that lobbyists are generally more prone to be “evil” than politicians are. If I must say “Here is the bad guy!” I will look at the lobbyist first on two grounds. First, he/she is paid to concentrate on the benefit of a single group and use whatever wiles he/she has to be convincing. Second, the lobbyist has only one issue and plenty of time to concentrate on it, while the elected politician is expected to be expert on every issue before the congress, if only enough to make a reasoned vote on each and every item. Thus, for any political “crime” a lobbyist has the means, motive, and opportunity.

    This does not mean that politicians are all good (on every issue). It does mean that an honest politician can be fooled or distracted, but a lobbyist is paid not to be fooled or distracted. On the other hand, I am sure that many a politician is every bit as complicit as the lobbyist. Either way, perfect results require perfect honest and perfect planning. Is it any wonder that there is no perfection in government?

    Note: Many lobbyists are honest. Many politicians are honest. One can no more ban lobbyists than one can ban politicians. Whatever your race, religion, sex, age, occupation, or interest, there is a paid lobbyist working for you! (Even if you don’t authorize it and don’t know it.)

  • Anonymous

    I’m sure you are right about lobbyists. I just don’t blame them more than politicians. A lobbyist is supposed to be focused on their narrow agenda. Whether they are honest or try to bribe, it’s the politician’s job to research before acting and it should be the job of congress to ensure honest debate and deliberation before taking action. The congress needs to be far more transparent to the people so that things don’t sneak up on the public. When politicians start saying things like “You’ll find out what’s in the bill after it’s passed”, that politician should never be re-elected to any office again. I honestly believe that the system can work when dialogue is open and issues are addressed in a timely fashion to promote open dialogue and careful thought in full view of the public.

  • Anonymous

    That quote about not knowing what is in the bill until it is passed was a very clumsy thing for Pelosi to say. Very clumsy and very bad politically.

    Here is what she should have said:
    The bill is still in negotiations. We know we will get it passed because the main points are resolved, but there are many details still being ironed out. As soon as they are resolved, we will bring the bill to a full vote. Then I will be able to give you all the details.

    I believe that was what she meant to say. Make sense to you?

  • Anonymous

    Take for example, military jobs. All are prima facie economic waste. They produce no products and when they are actually “working,” they produce death and destruction. The only good thing about paying a soldier is that the money circulates when he buys food for his family and an iPod for himself.

    A tank is a pure waste of money since it generally sits around doing nothing. When it is used in training it consumes vast amounts of fuel. Its only purpose is more death and destruction. When it fires its ammunition in training or in combat, the ammunition is destroyed and another economic loss. The same goes for bombs dropped from airplanes and rockets fried from helicopters. All loss and no economic gain. A modern tank costs more than 100 commercial trucks, and then some.

    A commercial truck, on the other hand, produces tremendous economic value as it is used day in and day out to transport goods from factories to stores or from farms to graininess, etc. A truck can produce thousands of times more economic value than the cost of making it does.

    A capitalist knows there is more profit in making tanks. An economist knows that too, but he also knows that trucks are better overall. If he works for a government contractor, he will recommend building tanks. In any other situation, he will recommend building trucks. 

  • Anonymous

    You mean the Beatles song?

  • Anonymous

    YES… The irony is as thick as 20 W50

  • Anonymous

    YES… The irony is as thick as 20 W50

  • Anonymous

    Where is the White House connection? John Lennon was in the White House, or was it George or Paul who wrote it?

  • Anonymous

    Paul and John are credited with the song. The event I am referring to was the Gala Affair when McCartney suggested that Bush hardly ever read books? I have always loved the Beatles, but that moment, indeed, contained “irony.” LOL

    As you may be aware, I like to insert poems, lyrics and quotes into the fray? Sometimes trivia questions, usually easily Googled. Here is one you may not have noticed and given your background…

    What does Bob Dole and a ski run a Vail Colorado have in common? (The run’s name is “Riva Ridge”)

  • Anonymous

    Thanks. I  see the connection now.
    The sum of the song is I’m all for change, but no violence. More suited to Obama, no?

  • Anonymous

    I don’t have a problem with the phrasing of Pelosi’s statement, since both are the same thing even if what she said doesn’t sound as nice, it’s more honest. But it does not make sense to me. What I am saying is that the public should know well in advance of a vote. Not even 24 hours. More like a week. There’s no reason that this couldn’t have happened. Plans could have been put on the table and made public in advance of Town Hall summer (as I like to call it). Then every congressman could have discussed specifics with their constituents instead of their talking points.

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram