So says the left-wing whore.

F Ed Schultz!! Get lost you fat windbag.

The MSNBC crew are turning out to be a bunch of sore losers.

I could think of better words for her than slut, slut seems too nice for Laura, that would indicate all she does all day is have sex and has loose morals. What she does on air is far worse.

Liberal torchbearers… Thank you for showing Americans who you are…

Shame on Ed but greater shame on Comcast for keeping him employed.

Speaking of sluts…sorry, I meant to say Arianna:

NEW YORK (AP) — A judge on Tuesday refused to throw out a lawsuit by two Democratic political consultants who allege that The Huffington Post’s founders stole the idea for the online news website from them.

Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Charles E. Ramos denied a motion by lawyers for the media company to dismiss the lawsuit, meaning that the case will now likely move to the discovery phase of fact-finding by both sides.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_HUFFINGTON_POST_LAWSUIT?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-05-24-22-13-09

Azarkhan said:
So says the left-wing whore.

Democrats don’t really care how corrupt this healthcare “reform” is, how many payoffs it involves, how many people will be exempt from paying into it, how many generations will be paying dearly for it. They just want their “free” healthcare NOW!

Posted by: NoWayNotNow | January 23, 2011 8:09 PM

Posted by: Azarkhan | January 23, 2011 9:38 PM | Report abuse

“it’s very hard to deny people votes in the Senate”? Wow, the GOP has made a specialty of that so let them eat their own B.S.

Posted by: larry9 | January 23, 2011 9:19 PM | Report abuse

Democrats don’t really care how corrupt this healthcare “reform” is, how many payoffs it involves, how many people will be exempt from paying into it, how many generations will be paying dearly for it. They just want their “free” healthcare NOW!

Posted by: NoWayNotNow | January 23, 2011 8:09 PM

Posted by: Azarkhan | January 23, 2011 9:07 PM | Report abuse

Democrats don’t really care how corrupt this healthcare “reform” is, how many payoffs it involves, how many people will be exempt from paying into it, how many generations will be paying dearly for it. They just want their “free” healthcare NOW!

Posted by: NoWayNotNow | January 23, 2011 8:09 PM

Posted by: Azarkhan | January 23, 2011 9:07 PM | Report abuse

Democrats don’t really care how corrupt this healthcare “reform” is, how many payoffs it involves, how many people will be exempt from paying into it, how many generations will be paying dearly for it. They just want their “free” healthcare NOW!

Posted by: NoWayNotNow | January 23, 2011 8:09 PM

Posted by: Azarkhan | January 23, 2011 9:07 PM | Report abuse

Democrats don’t really care how corrupt this healthcare “reform” is, how many payoffs it involves, how many people will be exempt from paying into it, how many generations will be paying dearly for it. They just want their “free” healthcare NOW!

Posted by: NoWayNotNow | January 23, 2011 8:09 PM

Posted by: Azarkhan | January 23, 2011 9:07 PM | Report abuse

When did you learn to use the computer, sometime in February?

Amazing, considering last night on his TV show he did a piece on Limbaugh where he declared conservative talk “Hate radio”, or some such. He also had the temerity to blast Limbaugh because his ratings are down the past few months. Ed said the numbers show him “tanking’. Of course that is something that can never be said of Schultz, because his microscopic audience share shows he has begun in the tank, and never has been close to climbing out of it.

Fat Eddie is a disgrace- to himself, his party and, most especially, to MSNBC and Comcast.

Fat Ed just needs to calm down and have a few Twinkies!

RhapsodyinBlue said:
I could think of better words for her than slut, slut seems too nice for Laura, that would indicate all she does all day is have sex and has loose morals. What she does on air is far worse.

Like what? Tell the truth? Sorry if the canonballs of truth are tearing down the walls protecting your fantasy world, but truth can be painful to those who refuse to accept it.

Hate monger. Plain and simple.

And what Laura said wasn’t even bad!!

“I do think of the disconnect and maybe the tone-deafness, if you will, of that devastation from Missouri. Heart-breaking pictures and then President Obama lifting the glass of Guinness. There’s something about that, that I think hits people in the gut. . . . Maybe the Irish part of the trip could have been put off to another day.”

Ingraham did understand the President has to juggle a lot of balls at once, and seemed more annoyed by the media’s “crazy double standard,”

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/laura-ingraham-disturbed-by-obamas-tone-deafness-in-drinking-guinness-during-missouri-devastation/

The Real Radio Hatemongers
http://www.mrc.org/specialreports/2010/realradiohatemongers/ExecSumm.aspx

Tacky, Ed. You’re better than that. Apologize. Unconditionally.

This is hypocritical, how many times have I heard right wing freaks degrading women. Listen to Michael Savage calls females on news sluts, including Fox, bloody Rush always gives sexual reference about bend and take it in, raping all this bs. I didn’t see any freaking article from mediate about that. Even when they quote that little POS Maher, Mediate only quote the part where he insult Republicans, not his vulgar language or female body part.

At what point do these people stop with this junk. Not everything has to be so over the top and hateful.

sarainitaly said:
Hate monger. Plain and simple.

And what Laura said wasn’t even bad!!

Ingraham did understand the President has to juggle a lot of balls at once, and seemed more annoyed by the media’s “crazy double standard,”

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/laura-ingraham-disturbed-by-obamas-tone-deafness-in-drinking-guinness-during-missouri-devastation/

The Real Radio Hatemongers
http://www.mrc.org/specialreports/2010/realradiohatemongers/ExecSumm.aspx

What Ms. Ingraham said did not warrant that response, but it too was vile and tacky. Most of what she says is vile and tacky. Often crude. I know that appeals to you, with a good dose of coarse and dirty language added, but that does not make it acceptable.

skyfet said:
This is hypocritical, how many times have I heard right wing freaks degrading women. Listen to Michael Savage calls females on news sluts, including Fox, bloody Rush always gives sexual reference about bend and take it in, raping all this bs. I didn’t see any freaking article from mediate about that. Even when they quote that little POS Maher, Mediate only quote the part where he insult Republicans, not his vulgar language or female body part.

We need to be better than they.

RhapsodyinBlue said:
I could think of better words for her than slut, slut seems too nice for Laura, that would indicate all she does all day is have sex and has loose morals. What she does on air is far worse.

You are a complete loser! You are Someone who is wasting air on this earth.

This is why people like you and other moron liberals are jealous of Ingraham, Palin and Bachmann but mostly because any of these woman or woman like myself would never notice you or give you the time of day if we met on the street….you cant debate with facts or logic but resort to personal attacks and degrade them from a safe zone in your moms basement.

The King has seen the light! No more coarse talk about ‘Brisket’ Palin!

MartiniShark said:
Amazing, considering last night on his TV show he did a piece on Limbaugh where he declared conservative talk “Hate radio”, or some such. He also had the temerity to blast Limbaugh because his ratings are down the past few months. Ed said the numbers show him “tanking’. Of course that is something that can never be said of Schultz, because his microscopic audience share shows he has begun in the tank, and never has been close to climbing out of it.

Yeah, Limbaugh rates are down from 20 million to 19.5 million.

LIMBAUGH has MORE listeners in ONE DAY that SHULTZ has in ONE MONTH

What is it about Lefties that they can’t talk about conservative women without immediately going over the misogyny cliff? Is it that they’re unable to come up with substantive counterarguments and so resort to such vile comments, or are they really misogynists who get so worked up when you throw in conservatism that the mask falls off?

It’s not surprising that someone of Ed Schultz’s limited intelligence needs to resort to words like “slut”. It’s typical of him and everyone else on his side who argue emotion and not logic.

But I am starting to get sick of our culture of being “offended”. It’s faux outrage. Would anyone expect anything less from Schultz? These people are hack shock jock entertainers. They provide no information and add nothing to the debate.

Imagine Schultz, a college football meathead turned Fargo sportscaster turned liberal pundit trying to hold his own against Ingraham, an Ivy League graduate with a law degree. I think we all know how that would turn out.

The left has proved nothing is too far for them.

the rush limbaugh of the left. he’s even got the size going for him.

And ps, Laura could school Mr. Ed in a debate any day of the week with 9/10 of her brain tied behind her back.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Tacky, Ed. You’re better than that. Apologize. Unconditionally.

He’s not better than that. It’s expected.

The funniest all the right wingers freaking on Schultz were the same ones cheering on Beck last week “vomiting” over Meghan McCain.

Pathetic hypocrites…..

Think about the mentality of an Ed Schultz listener . Someone who seeks him on the radio dial . Someone who subjects the customers in his hair salon with this gobbledy -gook .
Alarming ,to be sure .

fenngibbon said:
What is it about Lefties that they can’t talk about conservative women without immediately going over the misogyny cliff? Is it that they’re unable to come up with substantive counterarguments and so resort to such vile comments, or are they really misogynists who get so worked up when you throw in conservatism that the mask falls off?

is that at all like insulting hillary clinton?

I dunno what all the fuss from the anti-American/conservative party is

its not like he called the president a “lyin african” or accused him of being a kenyan socialist without a birth certificate or accused him of drinking 40s and stuff….

Liberal Tormentor said:
The left has proved nothing is too far for them.

* the right.

I heard and though, rut-rho this isn’t going to go over well, even with the clarification. He needs to apologize and never use that word again, in any context.

Jackie_Treehorn said:
The funniest all the right wingers freaking on Schultz were the same ones cheering on Beck last week “vomiting” over Meghan McCain.

Pathetic hypocrites…..

or laughing at the obama the magic negro song.

Jackie_Treehorn said:
The funniest all the right wingers freaking on Schultz were the same ones cheering on Beck last week “vomiting” over Meghan McCain.

a very weak attempt at moral equivalency…

skyfet said:
This is hypocritical, how many times have I heard right wing freaks degrading women. Listen to Michael Savage calls females on news sluts, including Fox, bloody Rush always gives sexual reference about bend and take it in, raping all this bs. I didn’t see any freaking article from mediate about that. Even when they quote that little POS Maher, Mediate only quote the part where he insult Republicans, not his vulgar language or female body part.

Ding ding ding!

It’s quite hilarious just how the right wing brain works. Or actually it doesn’t work….

Nationman said:
or laughing at the obama the magic negro song.

LA Times… I know… pathetic…

skoorbekim said:
a very weak attempt at moral equivalency…

a very weak attempt at a counter argument.

She did date Keith Olbermann right? Just saying….

If she had a big zit on her face, it would be grossly inappropriate to call her a “big stupid poop face.” The PC police will really come down on you hard.

Let’s be honest, Schultz is the talk slut here. Why don’t people like him and all those MSNBC cronies try to focus on just doing good work? Maybe then they’ll actually get some meaningful ratings. It’s like the have-not’s constantly bitching about the have’s. Stop the whining… and figure out what you’re doing wrong!

skoorbekim said:
a very weak attempt at moral equivalency…

And an even weaker attempt at woman hate justification….

How is it any different? Both pin heads used disgusting language while describing a woman. Oh I know how it’s different….fat pin head is a liberal and drunk pin head is a rightie.

As I said hypocrites and you all prove me right daily.

conservatives crying when someone hits them back.

kinda like osama’s kids crying when the president took out daddy bin laden.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Tacky, Ed. You’re better than that. Apologize. Unconditionally.

No he isn’t. He has a well document history of such things.

“An ass is an ass,
And nobody can talk to an ass,
Unless, of course, the ass
Is the famous Mr Ed.”

skoorbekim said:
LA Times… I know… pathetic…

the song was recorded specifically for rush limbaugh’s show.

skyfet said:
This is hypocritical, how many times have I heard right wing freaks degrading women. Listen to Michael Savage calls females on news sluts, including Fox, bloody Rush always gives sexual reference about bend and take it in, raping all this bs. I didn’t see any freaking article from mediate about that. Even when they quote that little POS Maher, Mediate only quote the part where he insult Republicans, not his vulgar language or female body part.

So were you a hypocrite when you COMPLAINED about it when it came from the right.

Lib does it = OK

Conservetive does it = not OK

The world of skyfet…

the same conservatives whining here are over on the eric boling story defending him for insulting the Commander In Chief of The United States Of America

conservatism: lies, hate, and hypocrisy.

Ralph E. Vaughan said:
“An ass is an ass,And nobody can talk to an ass,Unless, of course, the assIs the famous Mr Ed.”

PSYCHO RAP !!!!

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
We need to be better than they.

A bit too late, dipsh1t.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
We need to be better than they.

You can only try!
Ugliness is in Lib DNA!

Jackie_Treehorn said:
And an even weaker attempt at woman hate justification….

How is it any different? Both pin heads used disgusting language while describing a woman. Oh I know how it’s different….fat pin head is a liberal and drunk pin head is a rightie.

As I said hypocrites and you all prove me right daily.

You’re not ingratiating yourself to either side. Either you have moral fibre or you don’t. Doesn’t much matter if there is a d or r regarding your opinion.

Thank you for the democrats on here who called Schultz out. We appreciate your civility.

Every once in awhile it’s fun to just say something totally partisan and nonconstructive. So here goes…..

You know why Ed is such a disgusting, loudmouth, blowhard? Because he’s really a Republican that cared only about money. He gained some semblance of a soul after his mom got Alzheimer’s and he got to see some of the realities that comfortable GOP voters rarely if ever have to deal with.

Thus, Ed is still just trying to make money. Laura probably appreciates this and called him to thank him. Now they both get their names in the headlines.

And we, the lemmings, get something to waste our lives away arguing about.

writer said:
The King has seen the light! No more coarse talk about ‘Brisket’ Palin!

In fairness, the Palin children’s tacky and self-absorbed mother gave them the most ridiculous names. “Bristol” because she wanted to work at ESPN in Bristol, Connecticut. I suppose we should all be thankful ESPN is not in Windsor Locks. An athletic facility, a tree, an airplane, a math abbreviation. I suppose we’re lucky we didn’t end up with Luge, Gum, Spitfire and Calc. Then, Brisket follows suit with a bodily mishap. Rupture? When did Christians stop Christening their children with saints’ names?

Nationman said:
or laughing at the obama the magic negro song.

Stop being an idiot. YOU KNOW that song was a response to an article by a LIBERAL, calling him Barack the Magic Negro. You libs have a hostile relationship with the truth.

msnbc is a very sick network.

Nationman said:
a very weak attempt at a counter argument.

we are talking Schultz here! should I employ the dialectic method of thought?

The libs/progs are really stepping up their hate filled rants and personal attacks on thoughtful and well informed commentators.  One wonders if this is a defense of, and response to, Baracks bad behaviour during his European vacation.  I keep asking the obvious question…Barack can’t remember what year it is, gets his car stuck exiting our embassy, interupts the British national anthem with a ‘speech’, refuses to take a sip from his glass after his ill advised toast, his consuming of alcohol in public, and his refusal to return home to deal with our national disasters…what will he do next?

Gaucho said:
the same conservatives whining here are over on the eric boling story defending him for insulting the Commander In Chief of The United States Of America

conservatism: lies, hate, and hypocrisy.

Would you please ‘splain to us, how in the hell talking about someone
chuggin a 40 is an insult!

Nationman said:
the song was recorded specifically for rush limbaugh’s show.

to make fun of the LA Times article…

posterchild said:
I heard and though, rut-rho this isn’t going to go over well, even with the clarification. He needs to apologize and never use that word again, in any context.

Big fat Ed used the N-word!!!

Now apologize for being caught, and continue lynching anyone who dare speak a word against KingBamster

Schultz played college football right? He has the air of a bitter, failed athlete. The kind of guy who treated people like shit when he was the quarterback in ’71 and never adjusted to the fact that people wouldn’t be kissing his ass forever.

King, my decoder ring isn’t working. So you’re saying you don’t intend to stop using coarse and vile language towards women?

“For the billionth time, when insulting someone in the media, don’t use a word that has negative connotations connected to their gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, of unchangeable physical features or handicaps. Why is this so damn difficult to understand? Ed, weren’t you just yelling at Eric Bolling for saying the President drank “forties?”’

Oh, yeah that’s right. Why go for crude and direct insults when there a million little landmine “code words” that can be used as proof of your racism.

What’s calling someone a “slut” when you can go for the gusto and accuse them of criticizing the president because he’s black.

Bad form, Ed… bad form…

skoorbekim said:
we are talking Schultz here! should I employ the dialectic method of thought?

we’re talking about degrading women, which has taken place on both sides of the aisle and should be called out.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Nationman said:
or laughing at the obama the magic negro song.

Stop being an idiot. YOU KNOW that song was a response to an article by a LIBERAL, calling him Barack the Magic Negro. You libs have a hostile relationship with the truth.

so it deserved a song? you conservatives have to deal with so much hypocrisy running through your brains I wonder how you keep it all straight.

Jackie_Treehorn said:
The funniest all the right wingers freaking on Schultz were the same ones cheering on Beck last week “vomiting” over Meghan McCain. Pathetic hypocrites…..

Nobody is “freaking out” about Ed, everyone is basically pointing out how he is the guy who rails against talk from the right being so “hateful”. Then he goes ahead and spews the very type of bile he is known to rage about. let’s remember, he even has a segment on his show titled “Psych Talk”.

He is like the guy at a party who lectures loudly about all the drunks around him, and while gesturing wildly he spills scotch on his own shirt.

Ed ‘The Sargent’ Shultz has imploded.  He is out of control and needs to resign.  There is no place for him in radio or tv.  If he refuses to resign, as we all know he will, then he must be fired.

Dem4Ever said:
The libs/progs are really stepping up their hate filled rants and personal attacks on thoughtful and well informed commentators.  One wonders if this is a defense of, and response to, Baracks bad behaviour during his European vacation.  I keep asking the obvious question…Barack can’t remember what year it is, gets his car stuck exiting our embassy, interupts the British national anthem with a ’speech’, refuses to take a sip from his glass after his ill advised toast, his consuming of alcohol in public, and his refusal to return home to deal with our national disasters…what will he do next?

And reps/Baggers call children names and vomit over the looks of females…..

Wow goes both ways doesn’t it looney?

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Tacky, Ed. You’re better than that. Apologize. Unconditionally.

OMG! I gave him a thumbs up.

Of course it deserved a song, Nationman. It was awesome! You libs deserve to be made fun of and Paul does a great job of it! But remember, every parody is based on something stupid said by one of you libs. Fortunately for Paul, you provide a ton of material.

Ingraham must in fact be a slut, because msnbc is a non-bias cable network, as opposed to Fox News, where they have a political bias. Why would someone on msnbc say something unless it’s completely true?

Moderate, if he didn’t said things equally offensive 100 times a day, I might have given him a thumbs up too.

Ed, weren’t you just yelling at Eric Bolling for saying the President drank “forties?”

Yes and so was Tommy…

But Tommy won’t be complaining about THIS any time soon.

skoorbekim said:
to make fun of the LA Times article…

so now moral equivlency is ok? When one guy writes an article it’s ok for someone else to state what he says?

I love all the Baggers and GOP’er jumping on this. Make sure you spell the N-word correctly on your next protest sign. Would you like some extra glue sticks for pasting those Monkey head on the Obama family?

Slut isn’t good enough for Laura Ingraham. I call Ann Coulter a @unt all the time and it is well deserved.

Jackie_Treehorn said:
You’re not ingratiating yourself to either side

So, How is the Smut Business, Jackie?

Liberal Tormentor said:
Of course it deserved a song, Nationman. It was awesome! You libs deserve to be made fun of and Paul does a great job of it! But remember, every parody is based on something stupid said by one of you libs. Fortunately for Paul, you provide a ton of material.

lol wut? some no name writer writes a shit ope-ed and suddenly it’s ok for limbaugh to use it? that must be like palin saying it’s ok for limbaugh to say retard but nobody else.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Of course it deserved a song, Nationman. It was awesome! You libs deserve to be made fun of and Paul does a great job of it! But remember, every parody is based on something stupid said by one of you libs. Fortunately for Paul, you provide a ton of material.

more moral equivelency.

MartiniShark said:
Nobody is “freaking out” about Ed, everyone is basically pointing out how he is the guy who rails against talk from the right being so “hateful”. Then he goes ahead and spews the very type of bile he is known to rage about. let’s remember, he even has a segment on his show titled “Psych Talk”.

He is like the guy at a party who lectures loudly about all the drunks around him, and while gesturing wildly he spills scotch on his own shirt.

Um have you read the comments on this story? Skyfet and yourself are the only ones who have brung up his hypocrisy. Don’t give me that crap. This whole thread has been nothing but weight insults (myself included) against him.

Michael Adam said:
I love all the Baggers and GOP’er jumping on this. Make sure you spell the N-word correctly on your next protest sign. Would you like some extra glue sticks for pasting those Monkey head on the Obama family? Slut isn’t good enough for Laura Ingraham. I call Ann Coulter a @unt all the time and it is well deserved.

That makes you a POS. :) Good Day…

GreyGoose said:
Like what? Tell the truth? Sorry if the canonballs of truth are tearing down the walls protecting your fantasy world, but truth can be painful to those who refuse to accept it.

wtf are you even talking about? We weren’t even talking about a political topic but rather how calling her slut is too good for this woman. Of course though, 8 thumbs 0 down… this site has been lurching to the right for some time now and the fact that you can have a 8-0 count on your nonsensical statement further proves that.

Since they have sister sites for Mediaite now when will they make Mediaite: Sane? Because this one has gone too far down the right winged rabbit hole

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
When did Christians stop Christening their children with saints’ names?

Better question– when did Christians start spewing venom like yours?

I fail to see the moral equivelency, Nationman (because is doesn’t exist). Rush was making fun of something stupid a lib said. How is that the same as calling someone a slut? I look forward to your liberal spin!

Jackie_Treehorn said:
Um have you read the comments on this story? Skyfet and yourself are the only ones who have brung up his hypocrisy. Don’t give me that crap. This whole thread has been nothing but weight insults (myself included) against him.

And weight insults constitute “freaking out”? The overall theme so far on the board is not distress over his misogyny, it is basically that Ed is a buffoon.

Lefty kids, you can’t defend this. RRK is right. Ed needs to apologize quickly and unconditionally. You know, she used to date KO. Maybe Ed was privy to some locker room talk. Ladies, stay away from liberals. They are not gentlemen. Apparently they kiss and tell.

Azarkhan said:
Speaking of sluts…sorry, I meant to say Arianna:

NEW YORK (AP) — A judge on Tuesday refused to throw out a lawsuit by two Democratic political consultants who allege that The Huffington Post’s founders stole the idea for the online news website from them.

Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Charles E. Ramos denied a motion by lawyers for the media company to dismiss the lawsuit, meaning that the case will now likely move to the discovery phase of fact-finding by both sides.

BTW for all the now apparent white knights of Mediaite offended by the usage of slut… this douche just called Huffington a slut and he’s at a 7 thumbs and 0 thumbs down mark right now. Funny how that works? Ridiculous site, infested by brainless, right winged boobs.

BatBoy said:
So, How is the Smut Business, Jackie?

Mr. Treehorn draws a lot of water in this town, BatBoy. You don’t draw sh*t!

Jackie_Treehorn said:
And reps/Baggers call children names and vomit over the looks of females…..

Wow goes both ways doesn’t it looney?

You are just mad because you’re embarrassed of Barack and what the world thinks of him.  You need to calm down.  Try to relax the presidential way…you know…with a couple of forties and a crack rock…LOL

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
In fairness, the Palin children’s tacky and self-absorbed mother gave them the most ridiculous names. “Bristol” because she wanted to work at ESPN in Bristol, Connecticut. I suppose we should all be thankful ESPN is not in Windsor Locks. An athletic facility, a tree, an airplane, a math abbreviation. I suppose we’re lucky we didn’t end up with Luge, Gum, Spitfire and Calc. Then, Brisket follows suit with a bodily mishap. Rupture? When did Christians stop Christening their children with saints’ names?

I don’t know. You like “Apple”?

MartiniShark said:
And weight insults constitute “freaking out”? The overall theme so far on the board is not distress over his misogyny, it is basically that Ed is a buffoon.

Um yes it does because the right all jumped in this thread to poke fun at Tubbo for doing the same exact thing they defended Drunkie for doing last week!

Totally out of line on his part. He should apologize.

Michael Adam said:
Slut isn’t good enough for Laura Ingraham. I call Ann Coulter a @unt all the time and it is well deserved.

But you’re a hateful little punk with a typewriter and a comment section read by tens, not a microphone heard by hundreds, so what you say just doesn’t matter.

He should be fired.

Dem4Ever said:
You are just mad because you’re embarrassed of Barack and what the world thinks of him.  You need to calm down.  Try to relax the presidential way…you know…with a couple of forties and a crack rock…LOL

Oh jesus christ ok again….

I DONT LIKE OBAMA
I DONT LIKE MSNBC
I DONT LIKE CNN

So when I make fun of you bagger morons and your hilariously shitty “News” network coming back at me with Obama or MSNBC insults just makes me laugh and makes you look foolish.

Right out of the Alinsky playbook. And like the good little drones they are, the lunatic lefty commenters here immediately try to point to statements made in the past by the other side. Never acknowledge anything. Deflect, Deny, Accuse. Leftists tactics in action. The American people are on to it.

RhapsodyinBlue said:
BTW for all the now apparent white knights of Mediaite offended by the usage of slut… this douche just called Huffington a slut and he’s at a 7 thumbs and 0 thumbs down mark right now. Funny how that works? Ridiculous site, infested by brainless, right winged boobs.

Because everyone with a conservative mindset is a hypocrite. Every single one of them. Expect nothing more from these people….

Hey, can I get a ruling from the Royal Spelling and Grammar Czar on this sentence of Jon’s

Here’s his comments:

Should it be “here’s his comment” or “here are his comments”. Sorry, I can’t rest until I get the official word on this.

Liberals sure are classy people.

Only a whacked out loon like Special Ed can get away with calling a woman a slut….double standards are rampant in the vile world of liberalism.

brownsound said:
Right out of the Alinsky playbook. And like the good little drones they are, the lunatic lefty commenters here immediately try to point to statements made in the past by the other side. Never acknowledge anything. Deflect, Deny, Accuse. Leftists tactics in action. The American people are on to it.

ALINSKY TACTICS!!!! AAARGGGHHHH!!!!!

God, you people are just completely out to lunch.

An aside: Ed Schultz is terrible. I wish he would be cancelled and go away forever.

Jackie_Treehorn said:
Oh jesus christ ok again….

I DONT LIKE OBAMA
I DONT LIKE MSNBC
I DONT LIKE CNN

So when I make fun of you bagger morons and your hilariously shitty “News” network coming back at me with Obama or MSNBC insults just makes me laugh and makes you look foolish.

There you go again.

Jackie_Treehorn said:
The funniest all the right wingers freaking on Schultz were the same ones cheering on Beck last week “vomiting” over Meghan McCain.

Pathetic hypocrites…..

not me.

sarainitaly said:
I am listening to the clip from the radio show, and that was gross, and rude.
Shame on him.
Megyn is a beautiful young woman.

funny, though, you don’t seem all that freaked when it is a lefty attacking Conservative women. Just months ago libtalker Mike Malloy called Sarah Palin a “whore,” a “streetwalker,” and a “crazy bitch.” We have seen worse here, about Palin and Bachmann. Where’s your freak out been?

Jackie_Treehorn said:
Because everyone with a conservative mindset is a hypocrite. Every single one of them. Expect nothing more from these people….

Those are interesting words coming from somebody who just expressed outrage at being labeled a CNN or MSNBC fan, while insulting “you bagger morons and your hilariously shitty “News” network ” in the very same sentence. So it is only wrong when they do it.

TheEagle said:
Totally out of line on his part. He should apologize.

I don’t agree. People shouldn’t apologize after the fact for things that they say. Schultz obviously hates Ingraham, had no problem calling her a slut, and at this point, an apology would be simply dishonest and would not transform him all of a sudden to a non-douchebag.

My respect and admiration for Ed Schultz has grown tremendously. Finally, left wing pundits are taking off the gloves and bashes conservatives mercilessly. Laura Ingraham is worse than a slut. Sluts actually make people happy an fulfill needs. Ingraham has BLOOD ON HER HANDS. Let me repeat that: LAURA INGRAHAM HAS BLOOD ON HER HANDS. Ingraham was the editor of the Dartmouth Review and took it upon herself to go to meetings of gay students, secretly tape them, and then out them to their parents, sending them the tapes. Who knows how many kids killed themselves for this C word’s actions. Kudos to Ed.

Well, I can’t say she’s a slut from personal experience, but Mr. Ed is entitled to his opinion. Personally I would put her in the “Harridan” category or maybe “Shrew”. I am sure that some of the CrazyCons think she is a goddess, but then they like their women horse-faced and bitchy.

Is that fat slob breakin’ wind again? Ed! You will always be a Punk Bitch in the eyes of America!

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
In fairness, the Palin children’s tacky and self-absorbed mother gave them the most ridiculous names. “Bristol” because she wanted to work at ESPN in Bristol, Connecticut. I suppose we should all be thankful ESPN is not in Windsor Locks. An athletic facility, a tree, an airplane, a math abbreviation. I suppose we’re lucky we didn’t end up with Luge, Gum, Spitfire and Calc. Then, Brisket follows suit with a bodily mishap. Rupture? When did Christians stop Christening their children with saints’ names?

Malia? Natasha?

MartiniShark said:
Those are interesting words coming from somebody who just expressed outrage at being labeled a CNN or MSNBC fan, while insulting “you bagger morons and your hilariously shitty “News” network ” in the very same sentence. So it is only wrong when they do it.

What sense does that make one bit? I mean seriously explain to me what you’re getting at here….

In all honesty Ed was operating on safe ground. He figures he can get away calling her a slut given his confidence no one is about to accuse him of being a skilled philanderer.

"Real" American said:
Well, I can’t say she’s a slut from personal experience, but Mr. Ed is entitled to his opinion. Personally I would put her in the “Harridan” category or maybe “Shrew”. I am sure that some of the CrazyCons think she is a goddess, but then they like their women horse-faced and bitchy.

So can i use your words for Ms. Maddow now???

Michael Adam said:
Slut isn’t good enough for Laura Ingraham. I call Ann Coulter a @unt all the time and it is well deserved.

That’s because you’re a classless dirtbag.

Pablo said:
That’s because you’re a classless dirtbag.

Says the guy who is supporting a malignant whore who bashes the widows of deceased firefighters?

Dem4Ever said:
There you go again.

She really likes that “bagger” stuff, and then calls conservatives hypocrites. What a tool.

Jackie_Treehorn said:
Oh jesus christ ok again….

I DONT LIKE OBAMA
I DONT LIKE MSNBC
I DONT LIKE CNN

So when I make fun of you bagger morons and your hilariously shitty “News” network coming back at me with Obama or MSNBC insults just makes me laugh and makes you look foolish.

For a guy who claims to hate Obama so much, you sure do get riled up over his goofs, gaffs and general idiocy  Me thinks you protest too much!

People like Ed Schultz and Keith Olbermann could learn something from Rachael Maddow – Stick to the issues and leave the cheap name calling out of it. While I am a libertarian and disagree with Maddow on a lot of things, I don’t often see her get into these childish name-calling rants.

"Real" American said:
Well, I can’t say she’s a slut from personal experience, but Mr. Ed is entitled to his opinion. Personally I would put her in the “Harridan” category or maybe “Shrew”. I am sure that some of the CrazyCons think she is a goddess, but then they like their women horse-faced and bitchy.

If this is horse faced, what on Earth is this?

Jackie_Treehorn said:
What sense does that make one bit? I mean seriously explain to me what you’re getting at here….

hahahahaha!

Pablo said:
If this is horse faced, what on Earth is this?

I’d take the sexy angry black woman over the skinny Tranny any day of the week.

Damn, Pablo. What are you trying to do to us?

Jackie_Treehorn said:
This whole thread has been nothing but weight insults (myself included) against him.

Michael Adam said:
I love all the Baggers and GOP’er jumping on this. Make sure you spell the N-word correctly on your next protest sign. Would you like some extra glue sticks for pasting those Monkey head on the Obama family?

Slut isn’t good enough for Laura Ingraham. I call Ann Coulter a @unt all the time and it is well deserved.

James Randal said:
My respect and admiration for Ed Schultz has grown tremendously. Finally, left wing pundits are taking off the gloves and bashes conservatives mercilessly. Laura Ingraham is worse than a slut. Sluts actually make people happy an fulfill needs. Ingraham has BLOOD ON HER HANDS. Let me repeat that: LAURA INGRAHAM HAS BLOOD ON HER HANDS. Ingraham was the editor of the Dartmouth Review and took it upon herself to go to meetings of gay students, secretly tape them, and then out them to their parents, sending them the tapes. Who knows how many kids killed themselves for this C word’s actions. Kudos to Ed.

"Real" American said:
Well, I can’t say she’s a slut from personal experience, but Mr. Ed is entitled to his opinion. Personally I would put her in the “Harridan” category or maybe “Shrew”. I am sure that some of the CrazyCons think she is a goddess, but then they like their women horse-faced and bitchy.

skyfet said:
This is hypocritical, how many times have I heard right wing freaks degrading women. Listen to Michael Savage calls females on news sluts, including Fox, bloody Rush always gives sexual reference about bend and take it in, raping all this bs. I didn’t see any freaking article from mediate about that. Even when they quote that little POS Maher, Mediate only quote the part where he insult Republicans, not his vulgar language or female body part.

what were you saying, jackie?

btimsah said:
People like Ed Schultz and Keith Olbermann could learn something from Rachael Maddow – Stick to the issues and leave the cheap name calling out of it. While I am a libertarian and disagree with Maddow on a lot of things, I don’t often see her get into these childish name-calling rants.

Ingraham was the editor of the Dartmouth Review and took it upon herself to go to meetings of gay students, secretly tape them, and then out them to their parents, sending them the tapes. Slut is too mild of a word for her.

Jackie_Treehorn said:
What sense does that make one bit? I mean seriously explain to me what you’re getting at here….

Ok, I’ll try. You labeled “everyone with a conservative mindset” a hypocrite. Yet, you were obviously bothered – based on your caps-lock typing – by the insunuation you were a CNN/MSNBC devotee. Then, within the context of your same defense, you turned right around and smeared conservatives as tea-baggers with a shitty news network. Therefore, you were angered for being grouped by a news network while grouping others by a news network.

In other words, you were hypocritical while accusing all conservatives of being hypocritical. Just like Ed charging the right as “hate radio” while calling a woman a slut, so you actually have come full circle while on this forum. Well done!

I just e-mailed MSNBC asking for a suspension. Here’s the link…
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10285339

No matter what political affiliation you have, calling someone a slut is pretty terrible, unless you have evidence that proves it. You have to draw a line somewhere.

RhapsodyinBlue said:
this insightful commenter just called Huffington a slut and he’s at a 7 thumbs and 0 thumbs down

Excuse me douche, but it’s at 10 thumbs up now. (PS: But I did apologize!)

James Randal said:
My respect and admiration for Ed Schultz has grown tremendously.

Because you’re a like-minded scumbag?

Dem4Ever said:
For a guy who claims to hate Obama so much, you sure do get riled up over his goofs, gaffs and general idiocy  Me thinks you protest too much!

Proof? Oh that’s right you’re pulling stuff out of your ass like the typical Bagger…..

James Randal said:
Ingraham was the editor of the Dartmouth Review and took it upon herself to go to meetings of gay students, secretly tape them, and then out them to their parents, sending them the tapes. Slut is too mild of a word for her.

That makes her a cold bitch, not a slut.

ProudCanadian said:
No matter what political affiliation you have, calling someone a slut is pretty terrible, unless you have evidence that proves it. You have to draw a line somewhere.

That is subjective.

I didn’t like Obama being called a racist by Glenn Beck. I don’t like Ed Schultz calling Laura Ingraham a slut.

Want to understand the STENCH OF DESPERATION oozing from the lunatic-left d-cRAT socialists and their stooges in the lamestream socialist media ? Here’s the reason:

“Any Republican over Obama
May 21, 2011

The results of a presidential balloting poll with a “generic” Republican pitted against Barack Obama can’t be making the incumbent president feel secure in his cushy Oval Office chair. The not yet named Republican is running two points ahead of Obama — cruising along at 45% to Obama’s 43%.”

These latest Rasmussen Reports survey results numbers (which AGREE with the results of similar Gallup survey) can’t be comforting to the lunatic-left, which is why the d-cRAT socialists are now in a state of total desperation.

Also, per the latest Zogby 2012 Presidential Election Poll (24May11): 52 Percent Say ‘Time for Someone New’

macombman said:
I just e-mailed MSNBC asking for a suspension. Here’s the link…
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10285339

I don’t think conservatives should go there, macombman. Leave the boycotts and the speech policing to the lefties.

The more these vitriolic mental midgets speak, the more they discredit themselves.

ProudCanadian said:
No matter what political affiliation you have, calling someone a slut is pretty terrible, unless you have evidence that proves it. You have to draw a line somewhere.

What’s interesting is that when it’s a matter of sexual immorality, some liberals argue that conservatives are particularly accountable for that sort of behavior, because they make an issue of “family values.

Now nevermind that liberals/ Democrats aren’t out there ENDORSING adultery, etc… so logically they are just as accountable as anyone….but I digest… So WHY aren’t liberals, who ostensibly CARE about feminism and sexism, MORE accountable for sexist remarks? Why aren’t they, by their own logic, MORE accountable than conservatives– who supposedly don’t care about those finer things at all?

Here’s the thing Mr. Bershad…

What’s amusing now is difficult to defend as you get older.

So when you gossip about someone…just remember that could be you.

I don’t see the “reporting” as a problem…I don’t think the story matters.

I think y’all “tattle-tale” innuendo based on other peoples’ research and add your own “mocking” editorialization of someone else’s work.

And dammit…you have sucked me in.

Write better.

TeaPartyPatriot said:
Want to understand the STENCH OF DESPERATION oozing from the lunatic-left d-cRAT socialists and their stooges in the lamestream socialist media ? Here’s the reason:

“Any Republican over Obama
May 21, 2011

The results of a presidential balloting poll with a “generic” Republican pitted against Barack Obama can’t be making the incumbent president feel secure in his cushy Oval Office chair. The not yet named Republican is running two points ahead of Obama — cruising along at 45% to Obama’s 43%.”

These latest Rasmussen Reports survey results numbers (which AGREE with the results of similar Gallup survey) can’t be comforting to the lunatic-left, which is why the d-cRAT socialists are now in a state of total desperation.

Also, per the latest Zogby 2012 Presidential Election Poll (24May11): 52 Percent Say ‘Time for Someone New’

Sigh

First off that poll shows 13% of Americans undecided, which means primary polling on the topic is kinda useless and the “Generic” candidate always does well in polling because generic is simply that, it is what anyone thinks the Republican candidate should be and has no flaws.

what a worthless pos. that messed up shultz.

never liked him, never will…especially after this.

Ed who?

I wonder when Tommy will weigh in and write an article with a headline like Ed Schultz as a misgynostic pig or something…oh wait, Ed works for msnbc not FNC, so I’m not really expecting one. Perhaps I’ll get the surprise of the day, but then again, Tommy is probably on the road or too busy or something to write an article calling msnbc anchor on the carpet.

James Randal said:
Ingraham was the editor of the Dartmouth Review and took it upon herself to go to meetings of gay students, secretly tape them, and then out them to their parents, sending them the tapes. Slut is too mild of a word for her.

Really ?… Can you prove that or are you just making chit up ?… I think you are a liar… Nothing worse than a liar !!

turk281 said:
I don’t think conservatives should go there, macombman. Leave the boycotts and the speech policing to the lefties. The more these vitriolic mental midgets speak, the more they discredit themselves.

hear, hear…

TeaPartyPatriot said:
Want to understand the STENCH OF DESPERATION oozing from the lunatic-left d-cRAT socialists and their stooges in the lamestream socialist media ? Here’s the reason:

“Any Republican over Obama
May 21, 2011

The results of a presidential balloting poll with a “generic” Republican pitted against Barack Obama can’t be making the incumbent president feel secure in his cushy Oval Office chair. The not yet named Republican is running two points ahead of Obama — cruising along at 45% to Obama’s 43%.”

These latest Rasmussen Reports survey results numbers (which AGREE with the results of similar Gallup survey) can’t be comforting to the lunatic-left, which is why the d-cRAT socialists are now in a state of total desperation.

Also, per the latest Zogby 2012 Presidential Election Poll (24May11): 52 Percent Say ‘Time for Someone New’

must have been a cut/paste job because, except from the first two lines, there is no childish name calling through it. you should cut and paste more often tp patriot.

sticks said:
Really ?… Can you prove that or are you just making chit up ?… I think you are a liar… Nothing worse than a liar !!

It’s actually true. But karma is a bitch, she later came to find out her own brother was gay. That’s what you homophobes always get. I absolutely despise this woman, but, I can never defend these words from Schultz. They are despicable and those words being said to Rachel Maddow or any other liberal from a con would have me irate.

who knew ingraham was so smart and accomplished.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1508496/posts

ChiliPeppersFan said:
who knew ingraham was so smart and accomplished.http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1508496/posts

Dartmouth Grad… Clerked for SCOTUS…

Gasket said:
It’s actually true. But karma is a bitch, she later came to find out her own brother was gay. That’s what you homophobes always get. I absolutely despise this woman, but, I can never defend these words from Schultz. They are despicable and those words being said to Rachel Maddow or any other liberal from a con would have me irate.

You didn’t provide a link because it might lead to her 1997 Washing Post editorial where she regrets her “callous rhetoric.” and said she changed her views after witnessing “the dignity, fidelity and courage” with which her gay brother Curtis and his partner coped with AIDS.

And by the way, “homophobes” deserve to have family members get AIDS? So we’re not just calling women sluts now, we’re wishing AIDS on conservatives family members?

You sound like NPR’s Nina Totenberg on Jesse Helms:

“If there is retributive justice, he’ll get AIDS from a transfusion, or one of his grandchildren will get it” – Nina Totenberg

There’s no way to install a filter on this pigs mouth. I hope Comcast pressures MSNBC to give him the boot.

Gasket said:
It’s actually true. But karma is a bitch, she later came to find out her own brother was gay. That’s what you homophobes always get. I absolutely despise this woman, but, I can never defend these words from Schultz. They are despicable and those words being said to Rachel Maddow or any other liberal from a con would have me irate.

You saying it’s true does’nt make it so, that is’nt proof… As for her own brother being gay, who cares ?!?!… As for me being a homophobe, now thats just you making chit up… I do agree with Shultz being a turd though… I don’t know how that guy even has a job… And just to enlighten you a little bit… Being gay or straight, has nothing to do with ones politics… Take me for instance… A dyed in the wool conservative, and I could’nt care less if you were gay…

Did NOW pipe up yet? Is Slut now added to acceptable words like Whore and Bitch due to NOWs silence and endorsement of Mr. Ed???

James Randal said:
My respect and admiration for Ed Schultz has grown tremendously. Finally, left wing pundits are taking off the gloves and bashes conservatives mercilessly. Laura Ingraham is worse than a slut. Sluts actually make people happy an fulfill needs. Ingraham has BLOOD ON HER HANDS. Let me repeat that: LAURA INGRAHAM HAS BLOOD ON HER HANDS. Ingraham was the editor of the Dartmouth Review and took it upon herself to go to meetings of gay students, secretly tape them, and then out them to their parents, sending them the tapes. Who knows how many kids killed themselves for this C word’s actions. Kudos to Ed.

You know that your little smear piece is crap – and not true? Started by Debbie the absolute dregs Schlussel.
She’s the same one who tried to smear Hannity. Debbie is dangerous beyond belief if anyone crosses her.

Lauran did not out anyone. I believe her Brother was gay.

next…..

Perhaps you should check and see that all the “stories” refer to Debbie as the source – nothing from Dartmouth
Review – doesn’t exist.

By now , Chris Matthews has noticed the attention Ed is getting and is planning to call Sarah Palin the same name tonight . And then Michelle Bachmann that the next night . And then it’s Palin’s turn the following night . And so on .

Gasket said:
sticks said:
Really ?… Can you prove that or are you just making chit up ?… I think you are a liar… Nothing worse than a liar !!
It’s actually true. But karma is a bitch, she later came to find out her own brother was gay. That’s what you homophobes always get. I absolutely despise this woman, but, I can never defend these words from Schultz. They are despicable and those words being said to Rachel Maddow or any other liberal from a con would have me irate.

why does it matter…why should it matter.

If you are intelligent there are so many ways you can insult someone other than by calling them a “right wing slut”

It does hurt.

LardAss EDDIE.. Someone else kicking your ASS in Talk Radio Ratings
and Triple your TV Show Ratings when she fills in for O’Reilly. 10 times your Book Sales,
and you call her names.
You can’t make this Shit up!!!
Plus you are ugly!!!
Just Sayin’

Just my Opinion said:
Plus you are ugly!!!
Just Sayin’

or there’s that….

im_lovin_it said:
Mr. Treehorn draws a lot of water in this town, BatBoy. You don’t draw sh*t!

Stay out of this DUDE…it is bigger than you!

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
In fairness, the Palin children’s tacky and self-absorbed mother gave them the most ridiculous names. “Bristol” because she wanted to work at ESPN in Bristol, Connecticut. I suppose we should all be thankful ESPN is not in Windsor Locks. An athletic facility, a tree, an airplane, a math abbreviation. I suppose we’re lucky we didn’t end up with Luge, Gum, Spitfire and Calc. Then, Brisket follows suit with a bodily mishap. Rupture? When did Christians stop Christening their children with saints’ names?

This is one sick hair stylist .

A wife beater calls an attractive intelligent woman a slut and we are surprised??

Really?

In happy glorious news, looks like that human trash that goes by the name of John Edwards is gonna get to know the other America he always bloviates about. Enjoy prison douchebag, I’ll pray for your motherless kids.

<blockquote
When did Christians stop Christening their children with saints’ names?

That’s an interesting comment.

Oregon Conservative said:
A wife beater calls an attractive intelligent woman a slut and we are surprised?? Really? In happy glorious news, looks like that human trash that goes by the name of John Edwards is gonna get to know the other America he always bloviates about. Enjoy prison douchebag, I’ll pray for your motherless kids.

I have a crush on you now after that post. A very hetero crush.

Ed should have said it differently. Just like Rush Limbaugh does.

skoorbekim said:
Dartmouth Grad… Clerked for SCOTUS…

Laura Ingraham believes that most people use these pages as opportunities to embellish their professional experience to lure in the unsuspecting site visitor. In that spirit … Miss Ingraham’s path to a career in the media took many unconventional turns. She completed high school in Connecticut at age 13, and at age 15 became the first person to ever win gold medals in both the winter and summer Olympics. After graduating at the top of her class at Dartmouth one year later, she decided to take time off to write her memoirs for which she won the Pulitzer in 1985. Miss Ingraham, recruited by various intelligence branches of the government, eventually signing on with the CIA, rising to the position of Director of the Agency’s Middle East operations. Later Miss Ingraham returned to academics at Oxford University, where she received a Ph.D. in Molecular Biology. At age 26, she became the youngest-ever recipient of the Nobel Prize in Biology for her work in isolating the key proteins involved in the breakdown of nerve cells in degenerative diseases.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1508496/posts

glenn113 said:
Ed should have said it differently. Just like Rush Limbaugh does.

Isn’t it funny that the same cons who are bashing Ed (deservedly so) are always defending Rush Blowhard when he makes misogynistic comments about Democrat or liberal women?

Oregon Conservative said:
A wife beater calls an attractive intelligent woman a slut and we are surprised?? Really? In happy glorious news, looks like that human trash that goes by the name of John Edwards is gonna get to know the other America he always bloviates about. Enjoy prison douchebag, I’ll pray for your motherless kids.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2666855/posts

Just my Opinion said:
LardAss EDDIE.. Someone else kicking your ASS in Talk Radio Ratings
and Triple your TV Show Ratings when she fills in for O’Reilly. 10 times your Book Sales,
and you call her names.
You can’t make this Shit up!!!
Plus you are ugly!!!
Just Sayin’

that’s right…that lardass shultz should stop calling people names.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/laura-ingraham-disturbed-by-obamas-tone-deafness-in-drinking-guinness-during-missouri-devastation/

The Real Radio Hatemongers
http://www.mrc.org/specialreports/2010/realradiohatemongers/ExecSumm.aspx

What Ms. Ingraham said did not warrant that response, but it too was vile and tacky. Most of what she says is vile and tacky. Often crude. I know that appeals to you, with a good dose of coarse and dirty language added, but that does not make it acceptable.

Vile and tacky?? Oh, PULEEEEEEEZE!!

Comcast, when are you going to step up and do the right thing? This guy Schultz is a mysogonist in the extreme and has no place in the lineup of any respectable cable entity. Surely your management has some standards of decency and can not in good conscience continue to condone such gutter behavior by one of your on-camera employees. You have given Schultz a chance, and in the past he has had warnings about his boorish bahavior. It’s time for him to go.

What the hell happend to civility? Tell me Liberals, where is it. Had this been Rush, Glenn Beck or Mark Levin it would be on every suckass show that’s on MessNBC. For that matter where the hell is NOW? Silence is deafening.

Eruptor75 said:
I have a crush on you now after that post. A very hetero crush.

Love your avatar of Gutfeld years gone by!

ChiliPeppersFan said:
Laura Ingraham believes that most people use these pages as opportunities to embellish their professional experience to lure in the unsuspecting site visitor. In that spirit … Miss Ingraham’s path to a career in the media took many unconventional turns. She completed high school in Connecticut at age 13, and at age 15 became the first person to ever win gold medals in both the winter and summer Olympics. After graduating at the top of her class at Dartmouth one year later, she decided to take time off to write her memoirs for which she won the Pulitzer in 1985. Miss Ingraham, recruited by various intelligence branches of the government, eventually signing on with the CIA, rising to the position of Director of the Agency’s Middle East operations. Later Miss Ingraham returned to academics at Oxford University, where she received a Ph.D. in Molecular Biology. At age 26, she became the youngest-ever recipient of the Nobel Prize in Biology for her work in isolating the key proteins involved in the breakdown of nerve cells in degenerative diseases.http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1508496/posts

Why then is she so jealous of Michelle Obama? She’s suppose to be this wear my religion on my sleeve Christian yet whenever I listen to her all she does is make fun of people and call people names. Isn’t there something in the Bible about jealousy?

lazzzlo said:
why does it matter…why should it matter.

If you are intelligent there are so many ways you can insult someone other than by calling them a “right wing slut”

It does hurt.

did you read the quote by gasket that you put in your post? the part where he says he can never defend shultz for calling her that?
to him, it doesn’t nor shouldn’t matter…it might have been easier to say you agree.

Gasket said:
Isn’t it funny that the same cons who are bashing Ed (deservedly so) are always defending Rush Blowhard when he makes misogynistic comments about Democrat or liberal women?

Limbaugh calls women sluts? Give examples.

Oregon Conservative said:
Love your avatar of Gutfeld years gone by!

Yeah, He is one my favorites. That pic always cracked me up. He has slimmed down recently though

glenn113 said:
Why then is she so jealous of Michelle Obama? She’s suppose to be this wear my religion on my sleeve Christian yet whenever I listen to her all she does is make fun of people and call people names. Isn’t there something in the Bible about jealousy?

i don’t know for sure, but my guess is that link is a gag. the first sentence says…

“Laura Ingraham believes that most people use these pages as opportunities to embellish their professional experience to lure in the unsuspecting site visitor. In that spirit …”

i’m just passing it on so take it how you want.

THE FAKE ROYAL KING said:

As opposed to Graeme? LOL!

Why is it all my posts have to be moderated? Come on Mediaite, I’m just trying to have fun. Don’t make me call you guys a bunch of C-Rags.

Jon writes, “”For the billionth time, when insulting someone in the media, don’t use a word that has negative connotations connected to their gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, of unchangeable physical features or handicaps. Why is this so damn difficult to understand?”

Exactly, well said. So simple too.

Good advice for pundits and mediaite commentators too!

ModerateMan said:
She did date Keith Olbermann right? Just saying….

That doesn’t prove she’s a slut, just that she has very bad taste.

Gasket said:
Isn’t it funny that the same cons who are bashing Ed (deservedly so) are always defending Rush Blowhard when he makes misogynistic comments about Democrat or liberal women?

agree.

fenngibbon said:
That doesn’t prove she’s a slut, just that she has very bad taste.

fill me in on that one!

This is too far. It’s something we’ve come to expect from Limbaugh and Beck and I think Ed should simply say it was satire and that would be the end of it.

ChiliPeppersFan said:
that’s right…that lardass shultz should stop calling people names.

I was pointing out the irony, Numbnuts.
But you must admit, Mr ED the Talking Horses ASS sure as hell
does not have a face and/or body for TV.
He makes Michael Moore look Thin and Handsome.
But these Idiots over at MSNBC are never going to get those Ratings
with these Stupid attacks on any and all competitors that just happen to
be kicking their collective Asses in all measurable categories.
Fun to watch at times, though!!!!!

Sam M. said:
This is too far. It’s something we’ve come to expect from Limbaugh and Beck and I think Ed should simply say it was satire and that would be the end of it.

Maybe he should just seal the records of the tapes. Like he sealed the records of him beating his wife.

Laura Ingraham is one of the most hateful pundits out there, if she can’t take the heat she needs to get out…She has said worse about other women…..BooHoo Ingraham!!

tatboy said:
Maybe he should just seal the records of the tapes. Like he sealed the records of him beating his wife.

That was satire as well. I thought you whack-a-loons understood satire. Huh.

This type of thing … though completely out of bounds …. is only OKIYAAR.

Sam M. said:
That was satire as well. I thought you whack-a-loons understood satire. Huh.

We do understand GOOD satire.

Well isn’t that special Ed Schultz, you are a typical male loser who, when he can’t win an argument with a women call her a slut in various forms.

It is not only a true sign of ignorance, boorish manners and low intellect that when you can’t debate or counter attack someone statement on its merit, you have to subject yourself to self-humiliation and vulgarity and that demonstrates Ed Schultz to the world what a pathetic sad person you truly are.

Liberals Nightmare said:
What the hell happend to civility? Tell me Liberals, where is it. Had this been Rush, Glenn Beck or Mark Levin it would be on every suckass show that’s on MessNBC. For that matter where the hell is NOW? Silence is deafening.

Wow that took all of 10 seconds….

http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-repeatedly-vomits-at-mention-of-meghan-mccains-naked-psa/

I didn’t know Ingraham was female as it’s hard to tell.

DonnaK said:
Laura Ingraham is one of the most hateful pundits out there, if she can’t take the heat she needs to get out…She has said worse about other women…..BooHoo Ingraham!!

Really Donna – you made that up and figure “what the hell”. Ingraham is very well educated as has never had to revert to ugly name calling.

So try another tactic – your lie is bs.

Alice67 said:
This type of thing … though completely out of bounds …. is only OKIYAAR.

You turn up like a bad penny and say something completely stupid – what a surprise! OSA!

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
You’re better than that

Nope. Don’t know why the suprise, this buffoon makes a habit of making an arse out of himself. Just another in the long line.

Boy, if they don’t fire this now…..

Ed Schultz smearing a conservative isn’t news. He does THAT every day. A news story needs to have some surprising element — like Ed Schultz debating a conservative, or Ed Schultz talking about the stories that CANNOT BE NAMED AT MSNBC (you know, unemployment, the economy, the border, the national debt, etc.). But Schultz engaging in vile smears is just Ed being Ed.

Liberals like Special Ed get away with degrading women, minorities, gays ect…..and then turn around and claim they are the ones who are fighting for their rights and equality…….and low informed ie: stupid people buy their BS and vote for them.

Ask Bachmann and Palin how the party of compassion treats conservative women!!

DonnaK said:
Laura Ingraham is one of the most hateful pundits out there, if she can’t take the heat she needs to get out…She has said worse about other women…..BooHoo Ingraham!!

Just out of curiosity, would you like to provide even a single example of hateful rhetoric?

I found a link to the godawful SPLC calling her the “Right-Wing Radio’s High Priestess of Hate”.

Funny thing is, that exact article seems to claim she’s dangerous because she doesn’t use hateful words. Typical. Read for yourself.

http://www.alternet.org/media/87236?page=entire

So until you provide a quote, I’ll assume that like most liberals you just repeat things that other people say. And that’s even more typical.

Rokker said:
I didn’t know Ingraham was female as it’s hard to tell.

Damn, what are you sleeping with?

Hmmm…okay, I’m beginning to understand.  Laura Ingram is a conservative, so if she criticizes someone it’s seen as vile hate speech.  And when Ed ‘The Sargent’ Shultz calls her a “slut” it’s her fault because she is alive.  Got it, thanks!

Colorado_Conservative said:
Liberals like Special Ed get away with degrading women, minorities, gays ect…..and then turn around and claim they are the ones who are fighting for their rights and equality…….and low informed ie: stupid people buy their BS and vote for them.

Or they tune in to watch them on HBO.

Rokker said:
I didn’t know Ingraham was female as it’s hard to tell.

laura ingram is a grumpy old lady, everytime i see her on fox, she is bitchin and whining about something….smile, get laid and have some fun sometimes and enjoy life…………………

Look, we can all agree that Ed is a donkey punchee, progressives are inherently stupid people, and they’ll never be more than whiny little bitches. Obama was the closest they’ll get for another couple of generations, and he blew it, big time, for those scumbags.

Why are left wing pundits so sexist?

ChiliPeppersFan said:
Laura Ingraham believes that most people use these pages as opportunities to embellish their professional experience to lure in the unsuspecting site visitor. In that spirit … Miss Ingraham’s path to a career in the media took many unconventional turns. She completed high school in Connecticut at age 13, and at age 15 became the first person to ever win gold medals in both the winter and summer Olympics. After graduating at the top of her class at Dartmouth one year later, she decided to take time off to write her memoirs for which she won the Pulitzer in 1985. Miss Ingraham, recruited by various intelligence branches of the government, eventually signing on with the CIA, rising to the position of Director of the Agency’s Middle East operations. Later Miss Ingraham returned to academics at Oxford University, where she received a Ph.D. in Molecular Biology. At age 26, she became the youngest-ever recipient of the Nobel Prize in Biology for her work in isolating the key proteins involved in the breakdown of nerve cells in degenerative diseases.http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1508496/posts

This was meant to be a joke.

Too Far: MSNBC’s Ed Schultz Calls Laura Ingraham A ‘Right-Wing Slut’

Too far?
I would argue that this is the typical behavior of most leftists in general.

Rokker said:
I didn’t know Ingraham was female as it’s hard to tell.

It’s hard to see with your head up your ass

mikey970 said:
laura ingram is a grumpy old lady, everytime i see her on fox, she is bitchin and whining about something….smile, get laid and have some fun sometimes and enjoy life…………………

She gave all that up when she became a lawyer.

fenngibbon said:
That doesn’t prove she’s a slut, just that she has very bad taste.

She also dated Lindsey Graham.

Rio said:
This was meant to be a joke.

thx…although she’s in pretty good shape, so the medals in the summer and winter olympics kinda threw me.

This just in:

“The feminist media watchdog group the Women’s Media Center (WMC) is calling on MSNBC to suspend television host Ed Schultz for calling conservative talker Laura Ingraham a “slut.””

Yeah, they do a TAX-CHEAT-olbermann-style JOKE suspension, if anything.

I think in the context that Schultz used the word, Ingraham is indeed a slut.

Well, I’ve been taking a spin around the web and I would not be a bit surprised if the statistics show that the number of people calling for Ed Schultz to be fire or suspended exceed the number of people in Ed’s ratings. That cannot be good for MSNBC statistics as a whole.

sarainitaly said:
Hate monger. Plain and simple.

Sara to Cobra when he calls out objectionable speech #1:

“Ignore it.”

Sara to Cobra when he calls out objectionable speech #2:

“Can’t you take a joke?”

Cobra to Sara about the Ed Schultz comments:

Is there a double standard at work here?

—Cobra

Too Far? The left doesn’t think so!

MSNBC will do nothing, they could care less what Ed does as long as he does it to conservatives; however, if he dare say anything mean about a democrat, he will be immediately suspended. Remember, Schuster got suspended for saying something about Hillary and “pimping Chelsea” or something like that. That earned him a suspension, even though he had slandered Sarah time and time again, that didn’t matter.

Ask NOW what they think. bwahahahaha

“Now I’m tempted to insert one additional zing–about men who preach civility but practice misogyny.”’

Welcome to our world….

mikey970 said:
laura ingram is a grumpy old lady, everytime i see her on fox, she is bitchin and whining about something….smile, get laid and have some fun sometimes and enjoy life…………………

Well, since it was Ed who was bitching and whining, shouldn’t you be addressing that comment towards him (or are you just hoping to get lucky)?

valkyrie101 said:
I think in the context that Schultz used the word, Ingraham is indeed a slut.

Please do the world a favor and leave it…..

If Schultz had any type of introspection he would drop his “Psycho Talk” segments, and drop his perpetual charge of right-wing talk radio speech. Of course, I would not say another word if his next “Psycho Talk” entry featured the audio of this particular outburst.

Ed Schultz SHOT his own hunting dog in a fit of anger not that many years ago.

Everybody in Fargo, ND where he spent years knows the story is accurate.

And that’s why Shuster countinues to enjoy his lofty MSNBC career… er, uh… hm. Maybe he’ll be a correspondent on Current.

Even Think Progress called out Ed on this. I don’t think they even cared when Olby called Scott Brown a racist, homophobic supporter of violence against women. Maybe it’s a baby step in what’s supposed to New Tone time.

Schultz: said Trump is A “12-Year-Old Who Just Learned How To Masturbate” on MSNBC and never got suspended either.

MSNBC is one sick network.

Wapo has this:

UPDATED 7 p.m.: Schultz suspended from MSNBC for a week. In a statement just released from the cable channel: “MSNBC management met with Ed Schultz this afternoon and accepted his offer to take one week of unpaid leave for the remarks he made yesterday on his radio program. Ed will address these remarks on his show tonight, and immediately following begin his leave. Remarks of this nature are unacceptable and will not be tolerated.”

joe7 said:
Why are left wing pundits so sexist?

You mean like Limbaugh today calling Mrs Hochul (winner of NY-26th district election) a “babe” today on his radio show?

valkyrie101 said:
I think in the context that Schultz used the word, Ingraham is indeed a slut.

Thanks for confirming that you are a fool.

Azarkhan said:
Thanks for confirming that you are a fool.

Would you be more comfortable if we just referred to her as wingnut Media whore?

I hate this woman I cannot stand her like I said before I think she is the worst the right has to offer. BUT Ed is a left wing hack as much as she is a right wing hack. If he calls her these names, then he better not get upset at anything anyone on the right says about lefties in the same vein.

Pablo said:
If this is horse faced, what on Earth is this?

I wish you could hear my chimp-like howls of laughter.

Your satisfaction is our eternal pursuit.

( http://www.overstockcn.net )

best running shoes

Gasket said:
You mean like Limbaugh today calling Mrs Hochul (winner of NY-26th district election) a “babe” today on his radio show?

Never said Limbaugh wasn’t in any way sexist. Thing is it seems to be revining up across the left.

Laura is a big time Christian. In the Bible, God uses the word “whore”, repeatedly, to denote those who take the money, but sell their soul. In that sense

Jeremiah 3:3
Therefore the showers have been withholden, and there hath been no latter rain; and thou hadst a whore’s forehead, thou refusedst to be ashamed.

Jeremiah 3:9
And it came to pass through the lightness of her whoredom, that she defiled the land, and committed adultery with stones and with stocks.

tatboy said:
Please do the world a favor and leave it…..

The expression “whore” is used 65 times in the KJV. Often the expression is used as a metaphor to denote those who compromise their integrity for personal gain. Isn’t that Laura?

Slut and whore are pretty much the same thing, just the slut is cheaper. Now Beck, he is a whore.

Cobra said:
Sara to Cobra when he calls out objectionable speech #1:

“Ignore it.”

Sara to Cobra when he calls out objectionable speech #2:

“Can’t you take a joke?”

Cobra to Sara about the Ed Schultz comments:

Is there a double standard at work here?

—Cobra

what are you talking about?

sarainitaly said:
Cobra said:
Sara to Cobra when he calls out objectionable speech #1:
“Ignore it.”
Sara to Cobra when he calls out objectionable speech #2:
“Can’t you take a joke?”
Cobra to Sara about the Ed Schultz comments:
Is there a double standard at work here?
—Cobra

oh, now i remember. I said I prefer to report the truly offensive posters, than to comment on them. I do call out some, and I do ignore some, because the truly offensive ones tend to get deleted. There is a difference on commenting on the post, and a TV host vs. an anonymous flame throwing troll in the comment section. I prefer not to *elevate* the truly deplorable comments with attention. I told you I prefer to report them to the moderators.

Can’t you take a joke? Really?

Like I said, sometimes a joke is a joke. Did TC write an article calling Justin Timberlakes skit on SNL racist or offensive? (I replied to you again in that thread.) Seems to be there was a double standard working there, if anything.

Do you want to limit free speech so much that no one can ever speak again, for fear of using a term that might offend someone? Do you want certain groups to be the only ones who can use certain words, own those words? Do black people own the term 40 ounces or something? No one can use that reference/slang? Really? White people can’t call a rapper a rapper? A house a hizouse? We already saw Imus get fired for using Ho, a term *owned* by black people?

Did you read what else I said about Ed? I find him offensive far and beyond using the word slut. I don’t recall ever calling for his job, or suspension – I prefer him where he is, making an ass of himself, his network and his ideology, daily. However, the Left works 24/7 to get FOX off the air. I despise Ed, so I don’t watch him. But I certainly have the freedom to express my opinion, or not, in a thread when I think something offensive was said.

I have also criticized right wingers for comments I didn’t approve of, including O’Reilly, Rush, Beck, and yes, Nugent (four years ago, when it happened – although he was attacking my candidate at the time). So please spare me the double standard bs.

I’m sure you posted a comment in this thread, which I haven’t yet found, expressing your disapproval over these remarks by Ed?

This is the same man, and the same station (MSNBC) who repeatedly call for ‘civility’ in political discussions – How’s THAT workin’ out for them?!?!? Not so good I see!

AND, the Liberals/Progressives/Democrats are ALWAYS proclaiming that THEY are the Party of tolerance, civility, inclusion, open-mindedness, acceptance, empowering women, and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah – How’s THAT workin’ out for them?!?!?!? Well, considering that the FIRST tact that the Left takes against ANYONE who disagrees with them, is calling them a ‘slut’ or a ‘racist,’ I’d say that that whole tolerance, acceptance and civility thing is not workin’ out so well!!!

And it ALWAYS seems to involve people on MSNBC! Olbermann had some doozies – just about EVERY night! And just a week or so ago, Chris Mattews was, once again, literally FOAMING from the mouth when in under 2 minutes time, he called the Tea Party people ‘haters’ TEN TIMES!!! TEN TIMES IN UNDER 2 MINUTES!!!

Yeah, more ‘civility’ and ‘tolerance’ and ‘acceptance’ – MSNBC-style!!!

Ed just get off the coffee and you will be fine.
I agree with whatever you say but less blustering even though you are mad at all the hypocracy and injustice of the GOP and the dangers they are for the people of america. How can all those ignorant people even think of voting for the party that does not care for them?? I get it . You are mad as can be. However let the bad words not be heard. Go to the dictionary and find word to describe people that sell themselves for money, people that lie and cheat to get their way, people who are indifferent to humanity . Please find some words aad have them ready for when you are angry and get off the coffee. We also have to contend with people that think the earth is flat and dinosauus roamed the earth with adam and eve, My god we have a problem in usa. There is a lot to get mad about and ignorace is the first thing on the agends. Perhps you should interview a few 16 year olds from china and russia and india and brazil and get some of our kids in the same group . That would be an eye opener for america.

“For the billionth time, when insulting someone in the media, don’t use a word that has negative connotations connected to their gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, of unchangeable physical features or handicaps.”

Do they mean like the woman who made reference to “swinging dicks” on Morning Joe today? Betcha nbody’s gonna be bothered by that.

valkyrie101 said:
Slut and whore are pretty much the same thing, just the slut is cheaper. Now Beck, he is a whore.

I am so pleased you folks have defined things for us, Boy the list of whores or sluts as one of you seems to think is the same thing, grows by leaps and bounds now we know what to look for. Mathews seems to me should occupy the number one slot and Im sure you folks can fill it a few yourself. Liberals are so great at slinging names but reallllly have a serious hard time when they are thrown back. Such petty little people.