What Perry either ignores or doesn’t know is how greatly Texas has benefited from the investments and regulations of the federal government he despises. He grew up, he tells all who will listen, on a small, hardscrabble Texas farm. But it was Franklin Roosevelt’s Rural Electrification Administration that brought electricity to those farms, which, left to the mercies of the market, would have remained dark for decades. The New Deal threw money at Texas, bringing it dams, highways and schoolhouses. The cumulative effect of policies such as the federal minimum wage has been to diminish the disparity that
long existed between the industrialized North and the more poverty-stricken South.
The panel pointed out that Perry inspires liberals to respond with an “incredible passion and anger” — a fact that can justify the frustration felt by Perry’s base and, thus, actually help him out. Al Sharpton weighed in on this phenomenon and what it might mean for Democrats and Independents:
He would energize the Democratic base — and a lot of Independents — like no other candidate because you’re talking about a guy that openly supported, at one point, talking about seceding from the Union, he goes around preaching states’ rights — which not only bothers those of us in civil rights, but those that believe immigration rights and gay rights and others should not be decided in a state-by-state. Education, health care. I mean, you couldn’t have had a better candidate to energize, if the President needs that, than Rick Perry. If he does win the primary, then I hope he is there as the candidate
Plus, an added benefit: Liberal news and opinion media outlets would never be at loss for things to talk about with Rick Perry as the Republican candidate. In fact, Sharpton said, talk show and radio hosts would have to be very sure to have enough peppermint on hand to “keep our throats well-oiled.”
Fellow panelist Pat Buchanan, meanwhile, felt Meyerson’s op-ed piece wouldn’
Have a look at the discussion, via MSNBC: