Because he is black AND LIBERAL.  Hermain Cain gets no such treatment.  Atleast Walsh has the balls to be honest.

Wash is just an ordinary average guy…..who spent the last year; rocky mountain way.  Can’t get much higher than that.

Liberal media and liberals is correct.  Race is smoke and mirrors.

The national media almost always aids dishonesty that comes from any part of the political spectrum. They only care about ratings. 

Actually it is because he is liberal and BLACK.  Walsh is such a good guy. 

Earlier this year, Walsh said President Obama was only elected because be he was an “articulate black man” and “liberal guilt.”

Joe Biden and Harry Reid said similar things. Why don’t you post those quotes?

“I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,” Biden said. “I mean, that’s a storybook, man.”

“He (Reid) was wowed by Obama’s oratorical gifts and believed that the country was ready to embrace a black presidential candidate, especially one such as Obama – a ‘light-skinned’ African American ‘with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one,’ as he said privately. Reid was convinced, in fact, that Obama’s race would help him more than hurt him in a bid for the Democratic nomination,”

…said the deadbeat dad.

So very True!  As conservatives, let’s keep talking about how Obama is Black!  Many more will vote for our party!

How else do you explain the MSM not just looking the other way while he forceably rapes our children and grandchildren, but themselves joining him as willing participants in the debauchery?

I wonder if Reid still calls Obama a Negro?

He’s right and everybody knows it. Not exactly an outrageous observation, it’s been brought up by Hillary, Geraldine Ferraro, Bill Clinton, Harry Reid, Biden, and scores more Dems and liberals. Facts are nothing to hide from.

Well…Walsh IS right. You may not like him, but no one can argue with that.

His child support issues don’t discount the fact that he’s right about this.

Come on folks, if Obama was named Joe Smith and he was white, with the background and non-experience Obama had, there is no way Joe Smith would have been elected even in the primary over Hillary Clinton. Joe Smith wouldnt have gotten 99% of the black vote in record turnouts. Mr Walsh speaks the truth.

When he’s at home I’m sure he does. Harry is of an age and upbringing that he probably calls him our “colored president” when not near  microphone or any “colored” folks…

If it
were only a matter of race and left-leaning policies, why didn’t Carol Moseley Braun, Jesse Jackson, or Al Sharpton ever win the Democrat Party Nomination? 

Let’s take a look back at 2008.  It was not a good election year for
Republicans/Conservatives.  McCain didn’t run a good race, and was not sufficiently conservative (so says popular conservative Rush Limbaugh).  I think those were the top reasons why Obama won. 

As a black professional, I find it undesirable to complain about discrimination in the workplace.  If I saw a less qualified white co-worker being promoted over a black one, I wouldn’t question aloud if it was because of race.  If I had, everyone would probably complain that I was playing the race card. 

Now, white people are all too eager to label any occasion when a white man fails and a black man succeeds as a classic case of reverse-discrimination.  It is pathetic.

Mr. Dead beat Dad needs to start worrying about paying his child support.  

Gotta love Mediaite… We’ll offer our opinion/condemnation on Mike Tyson, Keith Olbermann, Alec Baldwin and any other liberal/anyone that says anything about a conservative.  But some loser congressman, Trump, Limbaugh or Beck that spew this crap on a daily basis… we’ll happily reprint it with some lame line at at end like “well there are two sides to everything, what do you think readers?” – (an Alex Alvarez special!!)

Now if a Democratic congressman said Mrs. Palin was put on the 2008 ticket because she has tits… me thinks Mediaite would weigh in with some opinion, probably getting “liberal” Tommy Christopher to rant about how over the top it was.

Thanks again Mediaite… anything for page views!!!

To answer the question in your first sentence, because they are idiots. Well Sharpton & Jackson anyway, Moseley-Braun isn’t an idiot but she was never on the radar screen with voters nationally.

To answer the question in your first sentence, because they are idiots. Well Sharpton & Jackson anyway, Moseley-Braun isn’t an idiot but she was never on the radar screen with voters nationally.

Go pay your child support, asshole.

Still doesn’t negate his observation. He’s right about Obama and you know it.

Does the fact that he didn’t pay his child support somehow invalidate his observation? It’s not like one has anything to do with the other, you know like ahhhh not paying taxes and being the treasury secretary.

And you are consistent on these matters right or left.

I don’t think you democrats want to get into a debate about deadbeat dads. Remember who your base consists of, stupid.

Speaking of “potpourri”, there’s not enough potpourri in the world to cover up the stink on this piece of shit Walsh. 

So it isn’t just a matter of race?  Someone actually has to be smart and campaign well?  From reading Joe Walsh’s comments, I thought you just had to walk in with a college degree and proof of at least one black parent to get the democratic nomination.

Well, you’re mostly correct, however Obama is also an idiot. His idiocy is only apparent when you he’s asked to a job outside of reading a teleprompter, though.  

Again, you liberals need to know your base. Quit while you’re ahead, champ.

Rape? You are a joke, not so fast.

And here we have a lunatic so far left that they think mediaite is rightwing.

You really can’t make this shit up. Truly astonishing ignorance.

That’s your interpretation, it’s not what he said, go back and re-read it.

How about the fact he walked away from his mortage, and then 6 months later found 30,000 to contribute to his campaign.

because cain is spewing old white dude talking points that were given to him with a fat campaign donation.

john can’t think for himself. much like cain.

i’m calling you a coward for hiding under anonymous names. meh

barack_must_go hates americans.

Doesn’t have a thing to do with his observation on Obama being correct. Ted Kennedy walked away from an Oldsmobile in the water but it doesn’t mean he wasn’t right about Jimmy Carter.

Yeah, but you are the guy who has defended every vile race-related thing that has been said by a teabagger, including things that they later apologized for. It is pretty transparent where you stand on race.

Yeah, but you are the guy who has defended every vile race-related thing that has been said by a teabagger, including things that they later apologized for. It is pretty transparent where you stand on race.

In the America I grew up in, being a deadbeat dad is shameful.  If there is one job that a man can’t fail or quit, it is taking care of your kids.  The fact that Rep. Walsh would rather run around raising money and campaigning so he could have a platform to complain about reverse-discrimination shows that he has no idea what is important in life. 

His 3 children’s well being should be on his mind, not the 2008 electorate discrimination of Caucasian politicians in the US. 

Being a deadbeat dad is shameful, but it’s got nothing to do with his observation. If he was commenting on Obama’s parenting skills or capability you would have a valid point, but he isn’t.

So, by “traveling to france” you mean punching out, going home and watching the travel channel, right?

You must have me confused with someone else.

Joe Walsh got it part right: The Media Will Protect Obama Because He Is Black AND A LIBERAL!

Hermain Cain wouldn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell in being protected by the media.

I guess Walsh never watches Fox to see how Obama is treated. I think that stories about Walsh should end until he pays his back child support. He loses credibility on almost all issues. I agree Obama has not done a great job but I have not seen any Republican in the current field who would get my vote.

Joe Walsh is right. Obama has gooten the most positive  press coverage of any president in history.The media covers up all the gaffes and bad

Of course, Republicans NEVER race bait…

That explains how Rethuglican Faux Bots keep getting re-elected?

You wanna explain the fact that only conservaligious Barking Bagger Dogs, seem to be addicted to Shouting BLACK every time they refer to the President, I don’t remember people saying the WHITE President Bush.

If Sarah Palin was 60 and overweight, would she have been the VP nominee??

If Sarah Palin was 60 and overweight, would she have been the VP nominee??

If Sarah Palin was 60 and overweight, would Republicans still support her??  Hmmm..

I mean, after all, they love to brag about how their women are more attractive. (But notice how they never say their women are more qualified)

If Sarah Palin was 60 and overweight, would Republicans still support her??  Hmmm..

I mean, after all, they love to brag about how their women are more attractive. (But notice how they never say their women are more qualified)

Everything Walsh said was true. The media is vested in Obama and they will ratchet up the race card soon. Just wait and see.  It will happen and then mediate can replay this clip to prove it.  

Republicans attack Dems for supporting an “inexperienced, unqualified” candidate for president…..yet they did exactly the same by supporting Sarah Palin for VP.

Sarah Palin is a joke and nobody would be talking about her if she wasn’t every Republican male’s wet dream.

Are you kidding?  Hermain Cain has been largely left alone, despite his kooky views on a whole host of issues.

Sarah was the most glaring affirmative action hire in history…promoted to a league far outside of her capacity in the hopes that she would energize those easily persuaded by attraction to the dull.

Obama’s bush meat in 2012.

Don’t think that’s the case now.   The media is more than willing to give a microphone to every crackpot teabagger who wants to say something nasty about the president.

…not paying child support does not necessarily equate to being a deadbeat dad. There are various reasons for a person to not have paid child support, or not to be up-to-date on his/her payments.

Some down-on-their-luck fathers raise their kids while living with the childrens’ mother (on the down-low), even though (by court order) they owe child support (because the mother had to file certain papers in order to get welfare).

But, I don’t suspect this kind of stuff exists in YOUR neighborHOOD.

Rethuglican Faux Bots !!!

Conservaligious !!!

Barking Bagger Dogs !!!

*Triple drink* 
*1 extra drink for new entries*

If it’s SOOOOOOOOOOO easy for a Black man like Obama to be elected President, how come he was the first?  I mean, it’s only took 232 years to happen right?

–Cobra

Anonymous Name !!!

*drink*

Your on a roll tonight bud…….I am SO CONVINCED by your Eloquence…..
Rethuglican Faux Bots ………Barking Bagger Dogs……conservaligious……These people MUST BE The Devils Spawn!!!
I’m gonna start supportin’ Obama’s re -election RIGHT NOW!
aiight…..peace out my man….hang tight….and try to throw down so more wisdom to your peeps!

Teabagger !!!

Racism !!!

*drink up*

at least HE MARRIED his baby momma before leaving her high n dry!

Palin Derangement Syndrome !!!

*drink*

It’s fairly easy to answer that question, but doing so requires a brutal honesty that Democrats can’t hear without going into fits of name calling and poop flinging stupidity the likes of which none of us care to see.

You can answer your own question if you just abandon all the brainwashing pc crap you’ve ever bought into and look at the facts.  

He’s right but he’s still a douchebag.

This guy does not pay his child support. why are we listening to anything that he has to say?

If obama was white he would still be smokin pot on some  beach somewhere…

RACIST!

Hey retard, Walsh is a United States Congressman, he should have the money to pay his child support.  If Obama owed child support I’m sure you would be defending him.  RIGHT.  BTW Obama doesn’t get a pass from the media because he is black.  That is ridiculous. The right wing media attacks Obama every day on the radio, on T.V., in newspapers, and in their books.  The left wing media, including Keith Olberman has also been extremely critical of Obama.

The truth is bothersome to liberals.

The truth is bothersome to liberals.

Did anyone see that stone that just flew by? I think it came from that glass house.

Did anyone see that stone that just flew by? I think it came from that glass house.

coward!

Paying child support is bothersome to Joe Walsh

  If it’s SOOOOOOOOOOO “fairly easy to answer that question”, why didn’t you answer it?

–Cobra

Exactly. There was a time when nuts like the “birthers” weren’t given the time of day. Now they are not only given a platform by the media but manage to get people like Trump to echo their nonsense. What Walsh said isn’t true, but you’ll never convince certain people of that. Now that Walsh has dropped any pretense, coming out and attacking the president on race, the only refuge they have is to pretend that he is right and therefore his remarks weren’t racist.
It takes a special sort to live in a country where, for hundreds of years, 43 presidents all had a certain something in common, and only now when the 44th breaks the mold do they complain of a racist agenda, not concerning the 43 presidents who were all white, but the one and only black president.

Like all liberals, people in the media have a deep hatred of America and are extremely guilt ridden.  They feel that white people are evil and and the cause everything that has ever been wrong.  To make up for that they have fallen in love with Obama.

Das racist.  Are you saying black people can’t think for themselves?  They have to get their “talking points from white dudes”?  Jesus.

Race warfare,……. “Walsh”

“Drink”

 Watch the liberal media play the race card on Joe Walsh….because he dared to say that the liberal media plays the race card on critics of Obama.  

You weren’t called a racist every time that you disagreed with Bush either.  So what’s your point?

The only way you can describe Walsh’s stupidity is to say he is a Tea Bagger.  He wasn’t thinking down the road when he signed Norquest pledge, and he was stupid enough not to recongnize the damage he created to our country by holding the country hostage and causing our credit rating to be lowered.  Norquest’s narrow mind thinks he can eliminate all tax increases and prevent tax loopholes from being closed.  In doing so he is strangling our country of needed taxes which only causes our Natuional debt to increase in order to meet our obligations.  He wants to either eliminate Social Security, or at least severly decrease its benefits along with Medicare and Mediaide which the majority of the country are in favor of.  He and his Tea Bagger followers are nothing more than idealist with no thought or understanding of what inflation and other factors will do to our economy without any means to counter increase costs due to inflation and other increases.  They would rather see our country default on our loans and go bankrupt, than to allow reasonable cost measures to be implemented that could both decrease the National debt or help retirees who have contributed to Social Security every working year of their life.  

Yes… “I don’t think you have a heart”- Parry

Weak, over-used sctick!!!

new material

*Drink*

Who?

Don’t you ever get bored of saying that?

Keep the hate ,spin and lies alive!    “Rape”?

The same argument can be used that blacks don’t mind discrimination as long as they are not the one’s being discriminated against.  And there is no such thing as “reverse” discrimination.  Discrimination is discrimination just as racism is racism.   

Not so much, actually facts and truth typically have a liberal slant.  It’s kind of something we have that you all don’t.

Here we go again, of course, when a black man succeeds someone always needs to question his qualifications, because its so hard to image he can actually raise to level of a white man….Oh the plight of the white man’s REVERSE RACISM!

“Brainwashing crap” ,…….. from a “tea”???!!!

No!

Walsh is like a reverse Al Sharpton.

THis guy cracks me up… doesn’t he owe his wife like 100,000 in child support?…. you are disgrace Walsh

“Extremely” critical?   Your kidding……..right?

Palin deragement syndrome???!!!

left field leap

*drink*

Where’s the real royal court jester,… when you need him?

*drink*

Don’t know about timzank, but aren’t you the guy to takes to every thread to call most everybody on the other side of the aisle racist?

I could’ve sworn that was you.

Succinctly put.

And the media is going to ignore the fact that he’s a deadbeat dad because he’s white.

Our credit rating was lowered due to enormous debt which a typical Washington style kick-the-can-down the-road deal did little to address.  Tea Party types voted against this deal.  Don’t believe me (I know you won’t, since you didn’t read it on a leftist talking point regurgitating site), read the report.

Standard & Poor’s takes no position on the mix of spending and revenue
measures that Congress and the Administration might conclude is appropriate
for putting the U.S.’s finances on a sustainable footing.

Once more, to “default” would be to not pay bond holders.  Nobody advocated for default.

Progressive narratives – sustained by progressive lies.

Hes right

it is not my fault that the talking points came from old white dudes

thats where they came from.

john, i’m saying that herman cain can’t think for himself. all of his talking points and proposals were written by special interest groups. (not unlike democratic ones either)

john is a poosey

texan is anti pot and therefore anti progress and anti america

They haven’t ignored it at all, where have you been? What they DO ignore is 70% of black kids born out of wedlock, THAT they ignore. 

They haven’t ignored it at all, where have you been? What they DO ignore is 70% of black kids born out of wedlock, THAT they ignore. 

obama is attacked by the right  because he is black.. nothing he does is right  or he’s critized for everything. mr walsh should put his hood back on his head so his ex wife will not recogize him when she’s try to collect the the back child support for his 3 kids

Next shocker from Joe Walsh:  the sun rises in the east.

I’ve been watching and reading a lot of things lately trying to figure out where the Obama administration went wrong.  Here’s where it went wrong:  right at the beginning.  And why was that?  Because so many people, especially in the media, were so caught up in the “historic” nature of Obama that they either forgot or chose to ignore a basic, very simple fact:  historic is not a synonym for good or competent.  

He’s saying that black conservatives can’t think for themselves – especially successful black conservatives. Blacks who think for themselves vote for Democrats because things work out much better for them that way. Don’t believe me? Just ask Detroit. 

Yeah, that crazy Liberty idea! Old white dudes!

You know what though? Marx was an old white dude too. As was Alinsky.

Life’s been good, but he might just walk away.

The CBC is conservaligious Barking Bagger Dogs? http://tinyurl.com/4ysbd8q

Sounds familiar.  Leftists must have looked at Bush and seen a black man.

So, your Momma was an idiot and named you after a nonexistent Marx Brother? She couldn’t spell “Karl”, right?

Because he was the first one to run that wasn’t an obvious jackass. It took a while for him to demonstrate it.

Joe Walsh is out of touch, here is an update on economics.

Divide Wall
Street into two separate entities. The Gamblers in one entity and the sound
investors in the other entity and watch the world economy improve. No more blood
sucking with excess profits and free market forces down our throat.

Price Inflation and Excess Profit Inflation from Wall
Street have sucked the life out of our economy. The Casino part of Wall Street’s
Profits have caused prices to rise so high, it went into a  free fall which we are still in and until the
general public has money to purchase again we will float around like the
homeless. Wall Street should probably be divided into two parts, the real
growth producers and the Gambling part which should be an entity unto it’s
self. Then they can compete with Las Vegas without disrupting real businesses
and national growth.

Per person Social Security is the most worthy
productive program on the face of the earth. It supports millions upon
millions, these people support the economy by re-circulating this money
continually growing and supporting the economy and it was actually money form
an insurance program. Compare this to your tax dollars paying $60,000 per year
to keep prisoners in prison, which is $5,000 per month, 5 times what Social
Security recipients’ receive per month. Republicans have nothing to compare
Social Security to when it comes to any program which benefits our economy
coming and going, it is a good and decent recirculation of money moving in
every direction.
Wall Street falls short of being decent, sound, steady and non-inflationary as
Wall Street is in its present form. They say workers wages are INFLATIONARY and
they moderately are inflationary and were recognized it as such when John
Maynard Keynes, the Father of Keynesian Economics, explained how Capitalism
could not survive without moderate inflation from time, use and the elements.
To understand this time, use and the elements situation better; “Line up 5,000
empty 6 oz. glasses in a single row, now take the first glass and fill it with
water, now take the first glass which is filled with water and continually dump
it into the nest glass and keep doing that until you run out of water. That is
where we are in our economy today. We need more water like our economy needs
more money. Those who say printing money is inflationary are wrong. Loss of
money through radical profits like Wall Street produces , theft, graft and
corruption through which many business push deals onto our Government Treasury
and it is criminal and proving John Maynard Keynes to be right on target with
accuracy.
Wall Street’s radical ups and downs trading for the sake of making profits on
money produces one thing and that is Profits and profits are highly
inflationary to the rest of our economy, look at the housing bubble and that is
the results. Inflation from moderate wage increases support and prop up our
economy by allotting more money to be plowed back into our economy and this
hardly impacts Inflation. Rapid Inflation from huge unrealistic Profits is no
different than theft, graft and corruption. It is so excessively upside down
that it actually smothers the remainder of the same system we all need to
survive and prosper.
The profits in Wall Street have been so enormous an unrealistic it has been
sucking the life out of our economy for a long time. It’s appetite for money is
more than our system can process.
Our Government needs to print enough money to get us out from under this
predicament and study, identify and correct all inflationary factors and who
and what is causing Inflation and legislate to see it never gets us to where we
are today ever again. We owe this to all of our kids.
People with personal agendas should not be allowed to participate in correcting
this problem.

Disaster Aid is the highest form of INFLATION next to
today’s High Stakes Casino in Wall Street.

Our Fore Fathers would not only honor the debt, they
would be there bodily to help with repairs.

Per person Social Security is the most worthy
productive program on the face of the earth. It supports millions upon millions,
these people support the economy by re-circulating this money continually
growing and supporting the economy and it was actually money form an insurance
program. Compare this to your tax dollars paying $60,000 per year to keep
prisoners in prison, which is $5,000 per month, 5 times what Social Security
recipients’ receive per month. Republicans have nothing to compare Social
Security to when it comes to any program which benefits our economy coming and
going, it is a good and decent recirculation of money moving in every
direction.

Wall Street falls short of being decent, sound, steady
and non-inflationary as Wall Street is in its present form. They say workers
wages are INFLATIONARY and they moderately are inflationary and were recognized
it as such when John Maynard Keynes, the Father of Keynesian Economics,
explained how Capitalism could not survive without moderate inflation from time,
use and the elements. To understand this time, use and the elements situation
better; “Line up 5,000 empty 6 oz. glasses in a single row, now take the first
glass and fill it with water, now take the first glass which is filled with
water and continually dump it into the nest glass and keep doing that until you
run out of water. That is where we are in our economy today.  We need more water like our economy needs
more money. Those who say printing money is inflationary are wrong. Loss of
money through radical profits like Wall Street produces , theft, graft and
corruption through which many business push deals onto our Government Treasury
and it is criminal and proving John Maynard Keynes to be right on target with
accuracy.

Wall Street’s
radical ups and downs trading for the sake of making profits on money produces
one thing and that is Profits and profits are highly inflationary to the rest
of our economy, look at the housing bubble and that is the results. Inflation
from moderate wage increases support and prop up our economy by allotting more money
to be plowed back into our economy and this hardly impacts Inflation. Rapid
Inflation from huge unrealistic Profits is no different than theft, graft and
corruption. It is so excessively upside down that it actually smothers the
remainder of the same system we all need to survive and prosper.

If Obama was 60 and overweight, would he have been the nominee?

Whether Walsh is a deadbeat or not is for the judge in his divorce to decide. When we hear from the bench, be sure to let us know. Until then, we have the word of his wife’s lawyer. Which is about as credible as Larry Sinclair, IYKWIMAITYD.

Palin was immensely more qualified than this Community Organizer. Which, I guess the joke is on America now.

Says who?

Walsh’s kids know their father. Which puts them one up on Obama.

Nope. I’m a Herman Cain donor. Obama is SCOAMF.

Perhaps you have not been glancing Mediaite — his “kooky” views get plenty of play there, and elsewhere.

In any event, the point of the story dealt with a black president being protected by the media because he was black. So, along that vein, my point is “Hermain Cain wouldn’t have a snowball’s chance” because of his non-liberal views (“kooky” or otherwise). Capice?

AssSap, my point was and is “…not paying child support does not necessarily equate to being a deadbeat dad.”… I make no defense of Joe Walsh and his PERSONAL matters.

Because he is black and because his name is Hussein and his other name is Obama, which perfectly reminded us of Osama. I imagine there was a day that Nancy Pelosi went through all names in boxes of all races, with these postmodernly correct preferences.

You’re saying that many Whites have to make excuses when a Black person achieves something?  Why don’t you state something Blacks DON’T know about America?

–Cobra

Personally, I have a lot of respect for community organizers because I actually know what the job entails (unlike most of the people who attack Obama). 

Meanwhile, what did Sarah Palin accomplish?  She was the mayor of a tiny town in Alaska (I’ve been there, it’s very small)….and what did she accomplish (other than picking a fight with the local library about books)?

Oh yeah, and she was governor of a state with more caribou in it than people…for just over 2 years.

Meanwhile, Obama was both a state senator (for 8 years) and a US Senator (for the same amount of time that Palin was governor.)…winning statewide office in one of the largest states in the country.  

In both cases, Obama represented more people than Sarah Palin did in all of her offices combined.

Your dog doesn’t hunt.  

You can critcize Obama for many things…but saying he’s less experienced than Sarah Palin is ludicrous.

You’re suggesting that Obama memorize talking points and repeat them on cue like the Republican Candidates do?

FACT:  Every WHITE President since Eisenhower have used teleprompters–which means ALL of them, since every President before Obama was a WHITE man.

–Cobra

What’s the excuse for Alan Keyes and Herman Cain?  Why couldn’t Alan Keyes win ONE primary?  Why have there been so FEW Black Republican Presidential Candidates, and why don’t WHITE VOTERS support them, since the Republican Party is OVERWHELMINGLY White?

–Cobra

Just light your cross and be done with it. 

–Cobra

I don’t agree.  If Herman Cain had been the first major black nominee for president, the media would done the same thing.  He’s charismatic, likeable, good on TV, etc.  The story of the “first” anything for president is pretty compelling, regardless of party.

It’s not about whether Cain is conservative.  For example, George W Bush got lots of positive coverage during his first campaign….while the media was mocking Al Gore for his clothes, his “stiffness”, the internet, etc.   But, simply put, Bush was more entertaining to cover. You could “have a beer with him”.

The media’s main bias is for sensationalism and entertaining stories.

First, you need a precedent to say that the media protects Black President since we’re only 21/2 years into the first one in history.  Second, Conservatives on this blog seem to have a limited view of what “media” is.

Television & Cable–Fox News “protects” Obama? 
Radio–Are you kidding me? Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, Ingraham, Savage, Levin, and damn near every right wing talk show host “protects” Obama?
Newspapers & Magazines–Wall Street Journal, Washington Times, NY Post, Boston Herald, Weekly Standard, National Review…”protects” Obama?  Hell, even the professional left at “The Nation” criticizes him.

 This is just more whining from a White Male Power Structure that feels emasculated when somebody non-White and sworn to the RNC gets somewhere.

Pathetic.

–Cobra

So…you supported the economic strategies employed by the Clinton Administration, which left the nation with a budget SURPLUS in 2000, and a course to pay down the national debt?

–Cobra

How do YOU know about that statistic if the media ignores it? What–the Department of Health and Human Services sends you daily briefings?

–Cobra

finally someone’s got the guts to say it !

I’m not sure who Representative Joe Walsh despises more… the media or black people??

?? You do know Obama’s kids live in the White House along with the President??

A disgraceful deadbeat dad, who has the audacity to criticize ANYBODY….he only makes himself look more ignorant.!

A disgraceful deadbeat dad, who has the audacity to criticize ANYBODY….he only makes himself look more ignorant.!

Earlier this year, Walsh said President Obama was only elected because be he was an “articulate black man” and “liberal guilt.”

Yeah and he’s right.  A white man with the exact same resume as Ozero would NEVER have gotten the nom over Hillary.  You liberals know that’s true.  Affirmative Action baby!

Cobra, it’s hard to take anything you say seriously since you cried RACIST for me using the term, “the little boy who cried wolf”.  The hatred you have for white people is sad and unhealthy. 

YES because he is black remember!

I wouldn’t blame him if he was “smokin pot” on some beach now!

Damn, Joe. And you used to be my favorite Eagle.

Walsh is one of the reasons why the tea party gets a bad name. This clown won his district by a mere 200 votes. He wants to get as much publicity as possible before he gets voted out in 2012. How about a reality show to help pay for the $117,000 he owes in child support.

Really?  So Blacks should’ve voted for John “I was against the Martin Luther King Day Holiday” McCain because…..?

 Or George H. W. Bush who was against the Civil Rights Act of 1964….
 Or Ronald Reagan who was also against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Voting Rights Act of 1965, and Fair Housing Act of 1966.

  Right, Travis. Blacks should always vote for White Conservatives, because White Conservatives have always had the best interests of African-Americans in mind.

ROTFLMBAO!!!!

–Cobra

Michelle,
 
1.  Why do you think it’s NOT racist to call a FIFTY YEAR OLD Black man “boy?”

2.  Have you decided whether Obama and I bear the mark of Cain, or are cursed sons of Ham?

–Cobra

How unfortunate the what Mr. Walsh says is so tru, its easily found on here daily.

M.S.N.B.C.works for Obama and the Democratic party as a propaganda network to attack anything that is said against Obama.The A.B.C. show ‘The View’also works for Obama.Many so/called journalist toady the Obama party line.

No excuse for un-Godly racism.  Anyone who has to mention someone’s color while making some complaint about a person introduces racism into the statement.  Of course, nothing new for Joe.  Further, this dolt would do well to keep his big mouth shut till he pays his child support.  He is robbing his children and he thinks he has the moral authority to comment on any person’s character.  Joe, you give our party a horrible name and you need to first pay up on your child support obligation and then you MIGHT have some right to worry about others.  But you will be forever known as the deadbeat dad!

Actually Obama IS a negro and is proudly so.  No insult to say it.  Whether you say it depends on your culture and your age. Reid made a factual statement.  dated for sure but no insult at all.  But nice try to muddy the discussion waters.

Actually Obama IS a negro and is proudly so.  No insult to say it.  Whether you say it depends on your culture and your age. Reid made a factual statement.  dated for sure but no insult at all.  But nice try to muddy the discussion waters.

My comment goes to Reid and not the president.  Negro is an dated word and pretty much considered to be unacceptable in conversation today.  I absolutely understand your comment about culture and age as my mother in her 80′s does not understand that these words are appropriate in today’s world.  Having said that Harry Reid is a world leader and cannot be excused as easily as can be my mother.  

The words negro and colored are conduits back to the sixties and a time that the black community was fighting for equal respect which honestly they were not afforded in this country.  So no…  Obama is not a proud Negro, but rather he is a proud Black man, and in his case African American may be even more fitting, but he is not a Negro, nor is he colored..  If you don’t see my reasoning in this just ask a young to middle aged black person for their perspective.

Standard’s and Poor released three statements and you appear not to read or head the third.  To paraphrase what they wrote, Whenever there are congressmen willing to let the country go into default on their loans instead of meeting their obligations, there is a higher risk for default.  I think it is pretty clear who they are refering to.

Look up their third statement for yourself and I believe there will be no misunderstanding on your part for who is responsible.

See?  The Tea Party being willing to go so far as to allow our country to go into default on our loans has a cost,

Joe Walsh should shut his mouth and pay his child support, instead of talking shit and spending the money his kids should get on political campaigns.

not because he is black,  it is because he is black and liberal and invested in him for they got him elected with their lack of vettting.  He has nothing going for hm,  the economy sucks, his policies are partisan and he spends all his time in campaign mode…. he is not a leader nor a CINC he is a joke …  but he gives good speeches and they are his guy so he will get re elected again 

Nobody advocated for default.  Period.  Its been explained too many times for you not to get the difference between “default” and other things for your statement to be anything but a bald-faced, progressive lie.

If it were anything but another progressive lie, you’d be able to do more than “paraphrase” things and make unfounded assertions in a debate in which another provides links.

A triangulating, Democrat president willing to compromise to salvage his presidency after being reigned in for the last 6 years of his administration (the first two of which were typical hands-over-fist spending – look it up) by a congress controlled by a dedicated opposition of fiscally-disciplined Republicans is far, FAR preferable to what we have today

Paleoconservatarian, your totally wrong or misinformed and I’ll stick 100% to what I said.  I asked you to go back and look up the third statement Standard’s and Poor sent out since you seemed not to know anything about it.  I found out a long time ago there is no reason in arguing with an ignorant individual, especially who refuses to look up with the facts.  Again, why do you think the Tea Party got what they got at the last minute. Are you also not familiar with Norquest and his pledge?  If they weren’t advocating for default, they wouldn’t have had the power or the recognition they had.  You may falsely believe I’m a liar, but your just plain ignorant, don’t know the history like you think you do, and not worth anymore of my time.

I see to support your case you use the adjective “totally,” yet provide no link.

Nor will you next time you try to push your lies.  See you then.

http://www.black-and-right.com/the-democrat-race-lie/

GO TAKE CARE OF YOUR KIDS, JOE!
BE A MAN FOR ONCE!

Why anyone listens to a hillbilly is beyond comprehension. 

The civil rights act was first brought before President Eisenhower and was stopped in the Senate by a Lyndon Johnson. Wonder if that was the same Lyndon Johnson who first vetoed it when it came across his desk as President. Nah! That’s probably just a coincidence. That same civil rights act was opposed by Al Gore Sr. and filibustered by Robert Byrd. We can play this game all day.

I think the best way to judge whose ideas are best for is to judge them by the results once they have been implemented. Beginning in the ’60s, Democrats chose to implement massive social programs which included housing, welfare and health care. The city has been run by Democrats now for 50 years. What are the results? Many houses there cost only a few hundred dollars. Nearly 80% of the commercial real estate is vacant. Much of the city has been bulldozed and reclaimed by nature and they now have a problem with urban bears. The population of the city has decreased by about 60%. This is not evidence that blacks should vote only for conservatives (although I believe everyone should since conservative ideas actually work). It is, however, evidence that Democrats take the black vote for granted and that they would be better represented if they had a presence in both parties so every candidate had to compete for their votes. 

As it stands now, if an outside, objective observer with no skin in the game had to make a judgment over which was the party of racists – if he looked at which party was paying black people to stay poor and uneducated, living in crappy, violent neighborhoods and raising their children without fathers and compared that to which party supports small business entrepreneurship, the nuclear family, independence, law enforcement and personal responsibility and wants these things for all people – I think the choice would be clear. 

The civil rights act was first brought before President Eisenhower and was stopped in the Senate by a Lyndon Johnson. Wonder if that was the same Lyndon Johnson who first vetoed it when it came across his desk as President. Nah! That’s probably just a coincidence. That same civil rights act was opposed by Al Gore Sr. and filibustered by Robert Byrd. We can play this game all day.

I think the best way to judge whose ideas are best for is to judge them by the results once they have been implemented. Beginning in the ’60s, Democrats chose to implement massive social programs which included housing, welfare and health care. The city has been run by Democrats now for 50 years. What are the results? Many houses there cost only a few hundred dollars. Nearly 80% of the commercial real estate is vacant. Much of the city has been bulldozed and reclaimed by nature and they now have a problem with urban bears. The population of the city has decreased by about 60%. This is not evidence that blacks should vote only for conservatives (although I believe everyone should since conservative ideas actually work). It is, however, evidence that Democrats take the black vote for granted and that they would be better represented if they had a presence in both parties so every candidate had to compete for their votes. 

As it stands now, if an outside, objective observer with no skin in the game had to make a judgment over which was the party of racists – if he looked at which party was paying black people to stay poor and uneducated, living in crappy, violent neighborhoods and raising their children without fathers and compared that to which party supports small business entrepreneurship, the nuclear family, independence, law enforcement and personal responsibility and wants these things for all people – I think the choice would be clear. 

Travis Pierson writes:

“The civil rights act was first brought before President Eisenhower and
was stopped in the Senate by a Lyndon Johnson. Wonder if that was the
same Lyndon Johnson who first vetoed it when it came across his desk as
President.”

 Dwight Eisenhower was a MODERATE Republican who had a 90% tax rate on the rich, integrated the US Military, warned against the industrial-military complex and spent money on infrastructure so much that the Interstate Highway system bears his name.  Dwight Eisenhower was NOT a “White Conservative.”  NOT.

  That you and many of your friends online here conflate the terms so often in some effort to confuse people is a joke.

–Cobra

“Salvage his Presidency?”  He smoked Bob Dole in 96 and left office with the highest approval ratings of any President since WW2.

  Turn off Fox News and read a book for once.

–Cobra

False.  Ron Paul not only advocated for default, he published articles in favor of it.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-22/default-now-or-suffer-a-more-expensive-crisis-later-ron-paul.html

–Cobra

At least that’s a link.  Unfortunately, it’s one to Ron Paul, gold bug that he is, making one of his points about how the country needs to go back to the gold standard – or “sound financial footing” as he puts it here – regardless of consequences.  One big reason why such an otherwise decent guy with some good, principled views on the constitution won’t pull more than a few percentage points.  It’s not happening.

One thing your link fails to do, however, is lend credence to M_Baker’s characterizations and statements.

I should have been more clear. President Eisenhower never GOT the Civil Rights Act precisely because Lyndon Johnson stopped it in the Senate. Ike said he would have signed it. In ’62, it was passed with massive, bipartisan support but President Johnson vetoed it once and threatened to veto it the second time. It wasn’t until the massive buyoff of “uppity negro” (his words, not mine) votes (known as the Great Society) was passed that he signed the Civil Rights legislation into law. 

If Eisenhower was a moderate (I’d call him a leftist) Republican, Kennedy was a conservative Democrat. JFK, after all, governed to the right of that neo-con wingnut, George W Bush. Again, we could play this game all day long. In the end, it’s the results that matter.

During the Eisenhower administration, federal tax revenues were about 18% of GDP, same as under every administration for as long as anyone has kept track. Kennedy cut taxes and the economy grew at a greater pace than it did during the prior 2 decades. 

In answering you last comment after this one, your grammer makes it appear that you must have been drunk when you wrote that last comment.  It makes very liitle sense and again would waste my time trying to explain it to you since you.  I guess hearing reality must hurt you inside, huh? Now just stop writting comments to me because I will no longer reply to nonsense.