1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough

The President Wants The Power To Turn Off Your Internet

» 5 comments

big-brother-posterTruth be told, more than once, particularly during the last two weeks of deadly slow news days, I have fantasized that someone would turn off the Internet. That said, I would probably prefer the President didn’t actually have this sort of control over my lifeline to the world. There is, however, a bill making its way through the Senate that aims to give the President just that power, and a revised version sponsored by Sen. Jay Rockefeller is making even more waves. Here’s the gist of the controversy:

The new version would allow the president to “declare a cybersecurity emergency” relating to “non-governmental” computer networks and do what’s necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for “cybersecurity professionals,” and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.
*
Probably the most controversial language begins in Section 201, which permits the president to “direct the national response to the cyber threat” if necessary for “the national defense and security.” The White House is supposed to engage in “periodic mapping” of private networks deemed to be critical, and those companies “shall share” requested information with the federal government.

Of course, the official aim of the bill is to protect the nation’s cyber-security case of attack: “A Senate source familiar with the bill compared the president’s power to take control of portions of the Internet to what President Bush did when grounding all aircraft on Sept. 11, 2001.” An analogy which doesn’t necessarily instill confidence. Moreover, the severity of government enforced travel restrictions, while frightening in their own right, is somehow less frightening than the idea of the government preventing us from obtaining information. One imagines that by the time a bill such as this wends its way through Congress the amount of people in this country who actually own, say, an emergency radio, will be slim, indeed, making our dependence on an accessible Internet all the more important during an emergency. Remember the panic that followed last month’s Twitter outage? That is a drop in the bucket to what would happen if someone shut off the Internet nationwide. So arguably not the best plan of action.

Still, the real problem, which the President acknowledges, is that the government is currently unprepared to fend off a cyber attack. So in the end, better to have the government possess the ability to shut things down, rather than say, angry Georgian rebels? Don’t throw out your radio yet.

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • JimW

    Glynnis MacNicol once again proves how important it is to keep fools away from computer keyboards.

  • http://mediaite.com Steve Krakauer

    Hey JimW – do you have something constructive, worthwhile or on-topic to say?

    Because if you do, you should probably say it in the comments, instead of irrelevant crap like this. We wouldn’t want to keep fools away from our comment section through banning…

  • JimW

    “Still, the real problem, which the President acknowledges, is that the government is currently unprepared to fend of a cyber attack. So in the end, better to have the government possess the ability to shut things down, rather than say, angry Georgian rebels? Don’t throw out your radio yet.”

    Glynnis MacNicol once again proves how important it is to keep fools away from computer keyboards.

    Ban me, I truly don’t care.

  • ChrisNH

    Imagine if this bill does go through, there will be certain events that will magically be called ‘cybersecurity threats.’ What this bill apparently doesn’t describe (or, maybe it does) is what constitutes a ‘cybersecurity threat?’ Remember that silly faux-rumor that the U.S. Post Office was going to start taxing e-mails? I’m thinking that this guy wants to find a way to do just that.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Joe-Callan/100000200979966 Joe Callan

    Mr. Obama has already made it clear, however indirectly, that domestic spying is going to remain on the Federal Government’s To-Do list in the name of National Security. The Internet isn’t safe from either political party–and regardless of which is in power, American society classically errs in the direction of control.

    Instead of whining about the constitution like I always do, I gotta ask–if we’re okay with stomping all over our right to expression, why don’t rewrite our bill of rights? Obviously people today believe that (at least) the first, second, and fourth amendments go too far.

    If we’re so convinced that freedom of speech and that freedom against unreasonable search and seizure are too dangerous for our people to be responsible with, why aren’t we removing them from the bill of rights? It sounds heavy-handed, but it’s better than being clear and open hypocrites to our nation’s founding documents.

    If that plan sounds disgusting to you, thank goodness I’m not alone.

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Self-Serve Advertising | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram