Michelle provides proof for Debbie and fails to notice. Priceless.

Malkin defends the Tea Party fully knowing they have become irrelevant, while they just sit back allow Mitt to win the Republican nomination!!

The Tea Party has no power, no candidate, no crowds… they have nothing!!

“October 9, 2011- American Flags were prominent last Saturday, October 1, as a small but boisterous group of T.E.A. (Taxed  Enough Already) Party members congregated at Kit Carson Park in Escondido for some “October Tea.” Compared to the thousands who turned out for this weekend’s Occupy San Diego demonstrations, the crowd size numbered only about 60 people.  But participants were equally passionate about their dissatisfaction with the status quo in America.”

http://eastcountymagazine.org/node/7509

It should be noted this isn’t the first time Debbie has made the suggestion, even if indirectly, that the Tea Party was linked to the shooting.  She’s been saying it since about a day after the shooting.  The Dems didn’t know how to respond to millions of Americans resisting massive government takeover in so many areas – everything from TSA groping you and your children to decimating healthcare (shortage of drugs, doctors going out of business, businesses cutting back on offering health coverage options), the gifting of GM to the unions while stiffing retirees and investors (making it oh so attractive for investors and companies to invest money in the future).  The Dems response was the same Chicago-style response to politicians who disagreed with them – to demagogue them and try to redirect attention from the wrongdoers to those who are calling out the wrongdoing.

Jared Loughner  was a liberal Debbie.

As a woman, aged 40, possibly due to age, divorce, children,
family and other reasons, I do not believe in the idea of “fall in love
again”. But my friend introduced me to a fantastic website,

RichFlirt.org…where I not only found a rich “him”, but
also lived a better life. So try this site, never be alone any more, and
believe in yourself. cute guys and pretty girls are all in here online
chatting. come join us.

But Michelle Malkin is so much hotter than Camerota. Ooooooh, she so neat & petite!

ahhh your special glasses?  Where can I buy a pair?  You see what you want to see – that’s a good thing cause look at all the things you don’t have to bother looking at!

Lars ?

Good morning, Nutsofast. I look forward to a number of enlightening comments today.

I certainly don’t care for Malkin, but I have actually seen her form rational thoughts. Not today, apparently.

Camerota attempts to be a fair-and-balanced journalist and points out DWS doesn’t say what Malkin claims she said and gets shouted down…you can see, Malkin is like ‘nice try’

It is funny that you choose to berate Malkin in this segment when DWS is so far out of bounds…  she is again trying to suggest some sort of link between Loughner and the Tea Party? Really?  It would seem to me that you would be more likely to find a Loughner type at an OWS rally than a Tea Party rally.

DWS is a disgrace and she represents the most bitter of partisan politics which she attempts to decry but she does so only in a partisan manner and at the expense of republicans and the Tea Party.  American’s are not that easily fooled, her appeal only extends to the far left of her party.

Well… His comment is as enlightening as anything DWS or Sherrif Dubnik had to say.

But the problem is Malkin could’ve argued that DWS is off-base to say the tea party is coarsening political discourse, but saying that DWS blamed the tea party for the shootings is a complete fabrication of what she said!

Question… Why did DWS even bring up Tucson if not to make a connection? She is still trying to mention Tucson and Tea Party in the same speach to perpetuate the lie and smear that began minutes after the shooting. Dupnik (D) started the lie for his party and DWS perpetuate this myth.

lol……..you’re the one with special glasses. Anyone with a brain could see that Malkin was wrongly attacking Wasserman!

Little Debbie clearly was trying to connect the two.

Time to recruit the male version of Deb, Anthony Weiner, to take over her job.

How does she serve her constituents and do this too?

White chick totally set up the Asian chick and PWNED her for her ignorance.  They sure are catty over there at Fox.

$6.95 Glasses – Save 70%+ | EyeBuyDirect.com

Wait.

Oh Please! Then why does she even mention to Gifford incident?  She did so to make the psychological association between the Tea Party and the Giffords shooting.  DWS is disgraceful.  

Because she’s friends with Gabby Giffords! Is it bad to try to temper a heated political climate? I don’t see where this is something other than people trying to pretend she said something she didn’t say.

I’m glad I’m not the only one who thought Malkin was off-base here.

She’s friends with Gabby Giffords! That’s why she brought it up!

Hell, it’s never wrong to attack Wasserman.  The woman is such a partisan fool and blames republicans for the dumbest things that any attack on her is welcome. 

Ugly woman inside and out.  

Asia Carrera has really let herself go.  Oh wait.  Malkin is not exactly Mensa material.

You take what Romney said, spin it, and then Wasserman denies it? Your in need of far more than glasses.  

Boy, I loved her in Kill Bill: Vol 1 and Charlies Angels: Full Throttle.

Anyone who doesn’t think the DWS was trying to tie the shooting to the tea party is nuts. Its what they did in the immediate aftermath of the tragedy, its what they are doing now, and its what they will do in the future. Never mind that it is a slap in the face to the people to died to be used as a political anvil, its the height of having no shame. Quite frankly what the left has done with this event is almost worse than the nut who did the actual shooting. He is obviously deranged and had no or little rational for what he did. The democrats are consciously using this for political means-when they KNOW there was no connection at all to the Tea Party, its disgusting. It really is so disgusting it makes my head hurt.

What they do have is a voting majority. Why, because Conservatives and Independents will join together to rid ourselves of another corrupt administration. I think we are coming dangerously close to open physical hostility. The economic, and unemployment numbers have been posted and it’s another downturn. If this continues through 2012, we may be seeing the political European unrest and fighting in our own streets.

What about when you’re lying??

Irony?

Just because they’re friends doesn’t mean she isn’t taking advantage of the story. DWS is indirectly connecting the two by bringing them up in that way. The issue is what she implied, which is the nature of everything political these days.

Selective approval of the obvious? Malkin was directly on point.

Wasserman Schultz is the GOP’s MVP. This has got to be the dumbest female to ever hold any kind of office (For taking the DNC Job), But Warning my Lib friends, Wasserman Schultz was given the DNC job for one reason, as a scape goat when Obama loses by a landslide.

Then watch how much of the blame goes to this lady

Did you see the video? What part of directly indicting the Tea-Party with incivility that may have caused the shooting, didn’t you get.

Pretend? She said it!! There’s no pretending!

Are you really so influenced by your ideology that you can not see what is clearly evident in her words, like I said, she only brings up the Giffords tragedy when speaking of the Tea Party to try and establish a subliminal link in the minds of the audience. It is disingenuous and exploitative.

Hey, you probably buy into her message and have a very low opinion of the Tea Party… I on the other hand do not… I think that what they have done is on the balance good for the country, I do not think that they have properly calculated what is necessary to fix this country, our economy, and what can be done to address our national debt, but they sure stand against further governmental intervention, and I very much agree with that, but that also makes them public enemy #1 for the likes of Debbie Washerman Schultz and progressives in general.

The Tea Party opened a whole new dialog which has caused many on both sides to take a new look at issues from perspectives that were missing from the national debate. Who would have thought a few years back that you would have republicans agreeing with progressives that Bush made horrible budgetary decisions which have cost this country dearly? The Tea Party has not been nearly as bad as the progressive side of the democratic party or the press would paint them, nor have they disappeared, they are still out there and still very active, those who think that they have somehow lost influence will again see their influence emerge once again in both congressional and senatorial elections.

It was more like throwing her a loaded question she knew Malkin would knock out of the park.

She makes as much sense as you caconservative, and that’s not a compliment.  She does sometimes cite her sources, though, something I know you’re working on :-(

Please seek medical attention. The pain you describe is likely a fusiform dilation located in the frontal lobe. It is nothing to be ignored.

And this is, of course, exactly what any “conservative” wants to happen. You’re giving up the goat, teabagger!

Great example seek… I knew you could come through!

who cares

That makes no sense. What does her friendship have to do with facts or logic?

Can you quote where DWS said this?

I’d call you a doucebag, but anyone reading your comment already knows that.

My glasses?
http://www.visionsource-lakevieweye.com/
I did’t need to see a thing in this case. The evidence was audible.

Um, you bring it up when you’re friends with the Congresswoman who got shot — and it’s near the anniversary of the shooting. Point to the quote where she blames the tea party for Tucson??

Why would anyone in their right mind engage Michelle Malkin in a discussion on civility and expect it to be civil?  She is the very picture of what’s wrong with the current level of discourse in this country.  And to top it off, she appears regularly on the network which exemplifies the lack of civility we’ve all come to know in the last decade, Fox.

And you are proving to be very civil… A perfect advocate for your cause.

Considering Michelle Malkin has never brought civility to any kind of political discussion what puts her in any kind of position to judge others on civility?  She just full of hypocritical hot air.  (That’s just another way of saying she is full b.s.)     

no one cares
http://www.hackers4ever.com

Hell, it’s never wrong to attack Malkin.  The woman is such a
partisan fool and blames democrats for the dumbest things that any
attack on her is welcome. 

Ugly woman inside and out.

The two have no connection. Why bring up the Tea Party at all? It would make just as much sense to bring up Willard Scott.

Geez – the guy was just trying to help you…why so hateful?

“We’ll see !”, said the Zen Master.

So where is this “war zone” country you are from? What war was raging on where you are from?

“Wasserman Schultz was given the DNC job for one reason, as a scape goat when Obama loses by a landslide.”

Just like how former GOP chairman Michael Steele got all the praise and credit for the 2010 Republican election majority in the House.

Oh, wait …

STFU

(you can thank Rudeboy11 and Mediaite for allowing people to use this uncivil and vulgar salutation)

Trolling again? 

trololololololololololololol

You are very eager to prove the incivility of the right.  Almost unnaturally so.  

Just want to hear about your interesting past, living in a war zone where you had to fight with your fists, and why it is that you hate America.

STFU, you never seem to criticize your own side Greg.

No, that’s why we intend to rid ourselves of Obimbo to head off just such a thing happening here. I believe if people know there will soon be an end to Obimbos administration, people will rely on that and civility may be held.

Yep, she’s so creepy that she makes my hair stand on end. Listening to her is like hearing fingernails on a chalkboard, only more painful. And she’s EVERYWHERE. Whenever she comes on, I try to change the channel as fast as I can. However, she’s yakking up her bile on most every political show now.

She is a huge gift to the GOP.

“Little Debbie”? Could you imagine that face on Little Debbie snack cakes? That would turn me off snacks forever.

>> Michelle Malkin: “There’s a line that just really made me snort out loud where she said “I hesitate to place blame,” and then a half second of hesitation, “But I will anyway. I blame it all on the Tea Party movement.”

I’m with Malkin on that one. I swear, the first time I saw the Wasserman-Schultz clip — no kidding — it actually did make me laugh out loud given how funny it was. Because Schultz starts off saying one thing…but, a second later, she just can’t hold back. So her brain flips a switch, and then she’s off to the races and is just vomiting up yet another DNC talking point.

And what makes it so funny is that Wasserman Schultz ALWAYS comes off as a comedic buffoon. Seriously, making her the DNC chair was one of the WORST decisions ever. Every time she’s on the air — and I do mean EVERY — she talks in a droning, nasally tone… she looks dour and sour… and worst of all, she just projects and personifies that classic Liberal snotty air of “know it all-ness.”

But what puts the icing on the cake is that she then lacks any kind of actual personality, as well as any ability to think fast on her feet. The result being that whenever she’s on TV, you can always tell — from the moment she opens her mouth — that she rehearsed her talking points to death. And as she drones on, you can tell she’s determined to say nothing BUT her rehearsed talking points. However, the second that anything goes awry or off-script (for example, she gets challenged the way Chris Wallace did last weekend) she suddenly has the wide-eyed look of a deer caught in the headlights.

At which point, she always turns into a babbling simpleton, where you can just SEE how desperate she is to get BACK to her rehearsed script because it’s all she knows. I swear, watching Wasserman-Schultz in action is a textbook example of “Bad Improv 101.”

Asking Malkin about civility is liking asking Roger Ailes about balance or Romney about being poor

Funny, a backhanded compliment, fallowing an ignorant rant. How about you work on the facts? Fact is, Malkin was on point. Wasserman’s an idiot!

I see what you did there.

Actually I am proving the incivility of the left and how Mediaite allows them to get away with it.

I have criticized liberal posters when they go over the top.  STFU is far from the worst.  From my perspective (imagine if you can) I provided a very unjerky response to a post claiming democrats are as bad as an insane killer (isn’t the inverse what made he/she angry to the point of pain?).  Since then I have been called a “doucebag”… which must be worse than a douchebag and told to STFU by you… All of this in response to an article where a right wing blogger called a Congresswomen a name for expressing her opinion on the tone of political discussion.  And now you want me to police liberals… sigh.

No – your belief Malikin is “on point” is just your opinion (a subjective belief – the result of emotion or interpretation of facts).  Try again – this is fun.

Well, now you can emphasize with the conservative female commenter who was told to STFU by a liberal (who also hates America btw, and probably isn’t even a US citizen based on his own comments) and also didn’t think she deserved the incivility which Mediaite allows.

DWS wasn’t blaming the Tea Party, except for the part where she blamed the Tea Party.

malkin is nothing but a person who makes up her own terminology because she thinks its cute, most of her assertions are baseless, and drools when she is on hannity.. . . what a snippy little broad, full of sound and fury signifying nothing

Some friend. Friends don’t use friends’ pain and suffering for cheap, dishonest partisan rhetoric.

Of course Wasserman-Shultz was blaming the Tea Party. She said they created a “climate of civility” that led to the Giffords shooting. It’s splitting the hair to fine to say she was *actually* blaming the Tea Party.

Isn’t Mediaite a little embarrassed to be covering the reaction to a media event that they chose not to cover at all?

DWS learned how to make points at the John Kerry School of Speech.
“You know, I was for that before I was against it…”

My thoughts exactly…..

So you like her because she represents Democrats badly…isn’t that what you want?  If you dislike her so much and find it necessary to write an essay about her for our benefit, is it that maybe she makes her points too well?  No, of course not.  That couldn’t be it.  You just dislike her because of her nasally voice and curly hair.

Why do the tea partiers carry guns to their own meetings?  Are they afraid of their own members?  Why did that guy use a gun to take down a Democrat?

Malkin is an unhinged crackpot who only gets media face time because she is a dependable lunatic when that is needed to spice up a piece.

You got that confused with the Romney ‘Flip Flop School’.

“We need to make sure that we tone things down, particularly in light of the Tucson tragedy from a year ago, where my very good friend, Gabby Giffords — who is doing really well, by the way, — [was shot]. The discourse in America, the discourse in Congress in particular . . . has really changed, I’ll tell you. I hesitate to place blame, but I have noticed it take a very precipitous turn towards edginess and lack of civility with the growth of the Tea Party movement.”

Mediaite is full of admiration for Fox and obsessed by all the angry pissy Fox chicks foaming on air. Today, only the rapport on Megyn Kelly is missing ;)

Shame requires introspection. So: No.

Because they believe that slightly higher taxes for the richest, investment in education/ environmental health and the use of federal power to protect minority communities equals a madness that will result in gulags and death camps… they are here to protect us from ourselves and dream dark dreams.

So you don’t know the difference between “like” and “dislike.”

Then yey!

Unelected officials have taken over Washington and are orchestrating the daily news. 99% of the comments and replies you’re reading online come from an NSA software program spamming the internet. Comments are created before the stories are ever reported. The oldest, first, highest, best, and most popular rated comments are all propaganda. They are conducting Psy-ops (psychological operations) for domestic spying. They have 1000′s of handles and are determined to bury the truth and attack anyone leaking it.

The next election is shaping up to be as big of a sham as the last. Do you know why Sarah Palin’s bus tour was really canceled? Do you know why she stayed 30 miles away from the second debate and chose the death of Steve Jobs to announce that she’s not running? Know what leaked out? Sarah Palin and Cain aren’t in the race for the same reason, the truth leaked out.
 

great irony, becoming totally uncivil to protest being called uncivil

There are hundreds of photos of Tea Baggers holding up vile, bigoted and racists signs.

There are numerous videos of Tea Baggers saying vile, bigoted and racist things

There are many documented cases of elected Tea Baggers officials sending out vile, bigoted and racist emails.

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it is a duck, the whining of low IQ Conservatives/Tea Baggers/Republicans not withstanding.

your intentions are not necessarily going to cause the end of Obama, and let’s face it, limbaugh, hannity and this malkin freak have been going at it long before we even heard of Obama.

“We need…. tragedy …by the way…America… in particular… I’ll tell you…place blame…towards…the… Tea Party movement.”
Oh my God your right!

“We need…by the way… in particular… I’ll tell you…the…Tea Party movement.”
Wait, no your not.

“We need… in part(xxxxxx)…the…Tea”
Looks like she was just ordering a drink.

Oh, please. Jared Loughner is an unstable schizophrenic. 

His politics are all over the place. 

Please place links to your “hundreds” or show some humility and STFU.

No, she made mention of the Gifford incident because it’s been used to bash Democrats and Republicans and because the signal to noise ratio has gone completely off the charts and it has been a big part of that. 

It’s pretty sad when someone gets attacked for urging people to be more civil.

What’s your IQ again? You failed to answer the last time I asked.

They do when that friend’s pain and suffering is being flung around the media in order to make political points at that person’s expense.

Wasserman-Schultz….the “femme-agogue” is waaayyyyy out of her class with Malkin.
Michelle eats little tidbits like her for a midnight snack

No, your view is much too black and white. Some tea partiers perhaps fit your stereotype, but most likely do not. Thus, its unfair to dismiss the entire tea party just because you object.to the actions of a relative few of its otherwise well meaning, and well intending membership. Of course there really is no “membership” in the tea party, yet. That is why we need a third party, a “Family Tea Party”, with Ron Paul and Donald Trump as our candidates.(and featuring Rand Paul, Secretary of Education,,Sarah Palin as Secretary of the Interior, Rudy Guiliani, Attorney General, with Cain, Bachmann, and a cast of others, gathered in one place for the first time),  Let the tea party have a voice to speak. If not this election, when?

Paul/Trump 2012
Family Tea Party, “Family Values, freedom from government taxes and regulation.”

That’s caca the Gifford incident was A-political, it was caused not by the level of political rhetoric in this country but by the sick inner workings of a demented mind. Again, I restate DWS is unabashedly using this tragedy for political gain

Nice to see Michelle featured here again.  She’s cute alright, but watch those fingernails. This time she gets a five, at best. 

For dumbest female to hold elected office (so far), choose from the following:  the Grifter (don’t claim to not know who she is) formerly of AK, Brewer of AZ., Fox of NC., Haley of SC. I could go on but if it isn’t obvious to you by now the absurdity of your comment, I’ve already wasted too much time on you.

Oh I forgot, Trump called Paul a nut. Then let’s put Guiliani as our VP.

Paul/Guiliani 2012, Family Tea Party

The contraction of “you are” is “you’re.” Hope that helps!

She’s the one doing the flinging.

AOB? Shouldn’t “Anybody But Obama” be ABO?

You prove my point about the low IQ Conservatives/Tea Baggers/Republicans. 

Haha, you are a riot!

An error in haste is still an error.  Recognition of my error your opportunity to distract from your much larger failure.  Cheers Jim!

No more comprehensible, but otherwise well done.

A request for simplicity? You excise with malice.

Well, in all honesty, Little Debbie snack cakes are cheap and horrible.

But I prefer Debbie Downer for DWS because she sure as hell is one giant downer of a person, constantly spewing nothing but vitriol.

Your right, you’re not the only one, there are others equally as unintelligent, liberal progressive democrats, willing to line up alongside you and tell us BLACK IS WHITE and DEBBIE WASSERMAN is RIGHT.

Wasserman Schultz repeats over and over and over and over the same Obama and the Democratic party propaganda lies attacking all Republicans and Conservatives.Schultz never answers a question because her head is full of cement.Wasserman Schultz is a lying disgraceful piece of leftist trash.

Oh, come on. ALL the yelling, sniping and swearing has been from Wasserman-Schultz and her ilk. I’m not hearing anything from tea party people. They are silent in the media because the media won’t let them speak. 

lol……..like heck it is, this time they didn’t blame Palin, that’s the only difference..

how come we don’t get to see these sign’s Hmnnnnnnnnnn

ok…….so what can you say now that you exposed yourself, as a jerk..

BINGO ………. You nailed this Lefty 100 %

lol…………..so she is that good……. you get gas pain’s….

you robotonics really like bodily systems. . . what does that have to do with anything?  Probably talking about what you get when you see her. . .

“;… when Obama loses by a landslide”

And when will that be, when Sarah Palin gets a brain?
Or when Mitt gets his foot out of his mouth?

Great reply!
Do you teach creative writing?
Seriously, dude–that was soo stupid.
You weren’t even in the same ballpark. Or any ballpark.

“She just full of hypocritical hot air.”

Which is another way of saying that she makes a perfect ambassador for the entire wrong-wing.

“…she gets challenged the way Chris Wallace did last weekend) she suddenly has the wide-eyed look of a deer caught in the headlights.”

Total crap, I just watched it. At no time was she at a loss for words. Chris Wallace was pushing hard, but never stumped her, and when saw that he couldn’t, he tossed it to Rance Preibus.

You don’t like her, that’s your thing.. But the rest is crap. She handles herself just fine.

“The economic, and unemployment numbers have been posted and it’s another downturn.”

Which numbers would those be? Not the ones I saw.

I  know Nancy Pelosi & that old mono-tone voice of Harry Reid which just gives me the CREEPS, these people I thought were DUMBER THAN DUMBER & LOONIER THAN LOON, but wait there is this Debbie W Schultz who is LOONIER than them if that possible, she is an amutuer attack dog

Could I just send you all my money now, and avoid the details?

Yeah, and she likes you, too.
But you have to keep agreeing with her, or she won’t let you get any.
So, now you know what to do.

(Trust me, she told me that she thinks you’re cute.)

They’re also big at LOLing themselves. Probably on the correct theory that if they don’t, no one will.

“It’s splitting the hair too fine to say she wasn’t *actually* blaming the Tea Party.”

Not in the least. She was blaming them for the climate they created, not the act itself.

“….her appeal only extends to the far left of her party… ”

This from a wrong-wing drooler, who claims an understanding of the liberal mindset.
Yeah, we’ll call you in to lead us throught a self-examination.

“, I wonder if she as taken the time to ask Rep Giffords how she feels about DWS exploiting her tragedy for political gain. ”

Yeah, get on your moral high horse and you’re just gold.
Right, Gabby Giffords wouldn’t want to help the campaign in every way she could.

DWS meant that the teabaggers were significant in creating the ugly atmosphere that led a susceptible, mentally disturbed individual to target a Democrat.
Because it was a way to get it done, although a haphazard way. It didn’t matter which Democrat, nor which individual. Nor how much collateral damage.
With denialbilty all around.
No? Too paranoid?
Then they just created the ugly atmosphere because they got a bunch of ugly, nasty people together, got them talking, and that’s what happened.
Either way, she practically died, and most of you wouldn’t have felt too bad if she had.
Although you may have felt bad about the others who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Or not.

Alisyn Cametora is perhaps the dumbest of the dumb on any news station.  She needs to just read the news and not be allowed to speak on any issue since she clearly is out of her league.  She just made a fool of herself again this morning on Fox and Friends. She tried to dominate the Bain Capital discussion with Eric Bolding who had to correct her.  She speaks only from what she thinks and not what she knows.  Frankly she is a disgrace to all of media.  Her unqualified opinions make her a rambling, annoying commentator who is always wrong.  Honestly, send her back to a small news station in the east or anywhere.  She has no talent, no knowledge and no value.

Have you considered seeing a shrink? It would probably be money well spent.

Sums up Gretchen, or Dooshe also.
At least Gretchen won a beauty pageant once.

stuttering jackass

That all you can come up with?
You ought to consider staying in the sandbox, you inept clown.

Yeah, Kerry couldn’t speak nearly as well as Dubya.
Apparently, speaking ability wasn’t all that important in 04.
Hence, the result.

It’s not my intentions alone, the majority of American voters know this clown has failed and we must find new competent leadership.

What sort of climate has OWS created? Do you blame them for all the crime that follows them around?

Well put.

Seriously?
Well, at least we know what conservatives do for fun on Saturday night.
I would blame OWS for the crime that supposedly follows them around if: a) they weren’t the victims of these crimes, not the perpertrators; b) if they were constantly discussing violence, as Palin was (Don’t retreat, reload), and Bachmann was (Second Amendment soliutons); and c) if Wall St bankers were being shot, instead of a Democrat.

It’s interesting that you would try this Orwellian reversal of the facts. Interesting in that it’s both a pathetic, and an ideal, example of what passes for the wrong-wing mind at work.
Just because you agree upon this idiocy amongst yourselves, don’t think that you can sell this to people of intelligence.

Or do you actually believe it yourself?

Ladies and gentlemen: The “No True Occupier” fallacy.

Try breathing into a paper bag, Steve. Count to 10. Enjoy a nice cup of soothing herbal tea.

It took you this long to come up with that?
Like I said, pathetic.
How is that the least bit responsive to what I said?
Why do you even bother? You’re so out of your league.
Take a deep breath yourself. Then admit that you can’t cut it.

Or don’t, just a suggestion.

Again, nothing responsive.
And, “Just a suggestion”? Thanks, I thought that it was mandatory.
Btw, what, exactly, is  “The “No True Occupier” fallacy”?
Or do you just throw crap against the wall, and hope that something sticks?

So, what’s got you so agitated, Steve?

Hey, if you’re not up for the verbal joust, why are you here?
But whatever the reason, I’m not the one to blame for your lack of ability or preparedness.
That would be you.
Instead of projecting your shortcomings onto others, you might try some self-awareness.
 

Look, everyone. Steve thinks he’s jousting.

Well, I would be jousting, if I had an opponent who could joust. As it is, I’m just burying you.

Btw, there is no ‘everyone’. Just you and me. Look around; there’s no one here. The posts are 5 days old. This thread is dead.
Like you.
It appears that you not only lack self-awareness, but the more ordinary type, as well.
Why am I not surprised?
Perhaps you have another passive-aggressive piece of psychobabble to employ, in another lame attempt to cover your lack of wit, talent, or knowledge.
With an ad hominem attack.

Please tell us more, Steve.

That’s your last word?
And who is ‘us’?
We’re here alone.
That’s all that’s saving you from a public humilliation.

Eh?

Shh.

Nah.

What’s with all the hostility, Steve? You can tell me.

 Your statement is right on.