1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough

Bill Kristol Wary Of Low Turnout In NH: ‘I Think That’s Worrisome For Republicans’

video
» 51 comments

Following Mitt Romney‘s decisive victory in New Hampshire, Fox News political contributor Bill Kristol poured cold water on the Republican hopeful’s win, noting that turnout was remarkably low.

RELATED: Mitt Romney Clinches NH Win: ‘Tonight We Celebrate, Tomorrow We Go Back To Work’

“Look, Romney underperformed among late deciders, people who decided the last week only gave Romney 52% and people who decided before the last week gave him almost 50% and remains a question mark how effective Romney is the more he’s campaigning,” Kristol noted. “But he won and it’s a reasonable victory. 36% is not huge and he will, I think, end up with fewer votes or almost about the exact number of votes he got four years ago and turnout is down! That’s a surprise. Turnout is going to be down this year with no Democratic contest. I think that’s worrisome to Republicans.”

Bret Baier was incredulous of the negative reaction to Romney’s win.

“Many people would say (he) couldn’t have written a better script!” Baier exclaimed. “A call at eight o’clock, a speech in the eight o’clock hour. Everyone is watching, he wins Iowa, he wins New Hampshire and bounces on to South Carolina — and that’s not a great night?!”

“It really doesn’t seem to me to be a great night for him,” analyst Juan Williams observed, noting that expectations were considerably higher for him.

Watch Kristol’s analysis that Romney’s low-turnout win should send shockwaves to Republicans:

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • Anonymous

    It’s Obama’s fault.

  • Jonathan Cantor

    How does this make any sense. CNN is reporting that New Hampshire is turning out a record number of voters. 

    http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/10/politics/new-hampshire-main/index.html?hpt=hp_t1 

  • Centrist79

    Romney with finsh at 37-38% , which is where most people thought he would be at the end of the night. Kristol is right that turnout is a bad sign. There does not seem to be the excitement of Republicans with their candidates.

  • Anonymous

    The fallacy of your argument is that you said Kristol was right about anything.

  • http://mediamatters.org/ Leedog

    Bill Kristol being “worried” is a good sign for Liberals!!  =)

  • Anonymous

    It’s CNN. They’re always wrong.

    Turnout looks down a bit from the 234,851 who voted in 2008, but not by much.

  • Jonathan Cantor

    Really cause the story says:

    “A record 250,000 voters were expected to turn out for the GOP primary on an unseasonably warm winter day, Deputy Secretary of State David Scanlan told CNN. With no competitive challenger to President Barack Obama on the Democratic side, more “undeclared” voters could weigh in on the Republican race, he said. ”

    And where is your observation coming from?

  • Anonymous

    Mitt Romney’s polling average in New Hampshire, according to RealClearPolitics, was 37.5%. He’s now at 38.3%. Juan Williams is ignorant, as usual.

  • TVNewsViewer

    Don’t be popping the champagne just yet Dog. ;oP

    I get the feeling that as the dead wood drifts away and republicans realize Romney is the only one who has the potential to beat Obama, they will get in line.

    Put it to you this way, if I lived in NH, I would not bother voting in the primary, but I would vote for him on election day.

  • Anonymous

    With about 80% reporting there have been about 180,000 votes recorded so far. Not exactly rocket science.

  • Henry Wood

    Good point.  I don’t recall this ever happening before. 

    First time for everything, maybe?

  • Jonathan Cantor

    Oh so your an expert? Let me see your CV.

  • Anonymous

    Republicans are not excited about any of their candidates and they don’t really care; they are just excited to vote against Obama.  The R populous have been trained on what to hate, not what to like.

  • Anonymous

    This angle (complete with smarmy smile) was being pushed early on in the Iowa coverage before the numbers were counted up and it turned out to be a record.  It seems turnout was slightly off in NH (though not by a worrisome amount as depicted by the ever wrong “the Arab spring is 1776 all over again” Kristol in a race that was all but an assured Romney victory).  What’s the play here?  He’s already in the silly camp of establishment insiders pushing the notion of an Obama re-election.  Gingrich is no longer a viable alternative, if he ever was one.  So… fear mongering the results of early contests to spur a conventional (from the neo-con wing), Washington establishment-approved, late entry?  Or just sour grapes that there is no neo-con savior over the horizon?

  • DoNotMindMe

    You’re just looking to cause trouble tonight aren’t you? 

  • Anonymous

    Let me be the first to call low voter turnout a RINO.

  • Anonymous

    Yea the turnout sucks. But what really has the media pissed is this primary is boring and not a horse race. They want a horse race for their ratings and are trying to gin up anything that makes it look interesting when in actuality it aint. What isn’t being talked about it Romney has all the money he’s gonna roll over these clowns. Its like the US Army attacking Grenada.

  • 12voltman1

    Lack of interest it seems.

  • http://twitter.com/DolefulLions Doleful Lions

    Yeah low turn out but, 57 STATES CORPSEMEN!

  • Henry Wood

    Solyndra!  Golf!  Apology tour!

  • Чёрт Возьми

    You make a lot of sense, and it is inevitable that Romney will be the Republican nominee. That is not because of some subversive conspiracy within the Republican party or any other group. This is democracy in action.
    Most of all, it is proof that Mr. Krystal should be worried about the chances of a Republican win of the presidency. They are looking pretty slim right now.

  • Чёрт Возьми

    Everybody, even the craziest person, is right once in a while about something.

  • Henry Wood

    Interesting that the Iowa turnout was also pretty low, only about half of what the Dems managed there in 2008.

  • Anonymous

    No, most likely his parents

  • Anonymous

    Lack of qualified candidates.

  • Hout Bosques

    The problem isn’t with one or the other of you two – the problem is with the way CNN has written this.   

    The words:”A record 250,000 voters were expected”   could mean:   1. at the rate folks are coming in to vote, the combined number voting in these NH primaries will be the highest ever,  or, they could mean:  2. based on our expectations of warm weather, plus our hopes at CNN that this GOP clown show just keeps going & building & turning into something AWESOME … or at least something we can use to keep our ad rates up — because, really, we at CNN got nothing, we truly suck as an organization; we got one guy, a gay guy who gets all giggly when anyone says “poop” and he’s OUR BIGGEST TALENT — plus campaign hype we were fed & digested & regurgitated — because, again, We. Are. CNN. & this is how low we’ve sunk — WE AT CNN expected (& by “expected” we mean “hoped”) to sell this as AWESOME.

  • Hout Bosques

    May we take it that by using the words “There does not seem to be the”, when you actually meant ‘There is no”, you’ve capitulated, are preparing for the formal surrender ceremony & have gone over to the CNN Dark Force?

  • Hout Bosques

    I don’t know about that. The only reactions that I’m aware of liberals having to Kristol are:  

    A) deep dread when he starts ginning up enthusiasm for some prohibitively expensive foreign murder expedition (because for some reason conservatives actually listen this ghoul), and  

    B) delighted awe when the GOP establishment goes brain dead in giving up to him their choice of VP.  

    But “worried”, whoa: that’s a new one – Bill Kristol having an actual human-range response within the parameters of reality orientation … we don’t know have any experience to rely on in trying what to make something out of that. 

  • Hout Bosques

    Can we all play?

    WHAT’S THAT SPELL? WHAT’S THAT SPELL? WHAT’S THAT SPELL?

    Uh … four more years.

  • Anonymous

    Come on Mediaite. If you can’t run the whole segment to allow us to see the comments in context, then at least do a clean cut! You’re so amateurish with your edits a lot of time.

  • steph862715

    The 2012 Repubs are just like the 2004 Dems: they don’t particularly like their own guys, but they hate the President.  And just like in 2004, that won’t be enough to defeat the incumbent. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Arthur-Clark/100000610136790 Arthur Clark

    He’s ignorant for less then a point error? Your desperate for even mentioning the difference…

  • Anonymous

    Not Bill Kristol.

  • Anonymous

    Socialism! Muslim!  Anti-colonialism!  Kenyan Mau Mau!  And don’t forget, Saul Alinsky!

    It’s good to always repeat that last one.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3XCPJMKVTQIWMTFZHANRX5IIHQ Allen

    Bill Kristol can go to hell…….this weak-knee so-called Conservative needs to retire.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3XCPJMKVTQIWMTFZHANRX5IIHQ Allen

    Ron willams is a flaming pro-Obama supporter who trashes Mitt Romney ever chance he gets.

    Bill and Ron………….Mitt Romney won with 40% of the vote last night and with just Republicans won with 50% of the vote……..

  • Anonymous

    How do you back a vulture capitalist with no core principals?

  • Anonymous

    Mr. Kristol – knock off the baloney.  (can I say that here?)

    You talking heads moaned that Romney could not break 25%, and last night he hit 37%.  And still you moan.  He is still running against 5 other candidates, and Obama. 

    That sir – is quite a heavy load – for anyone.

    Keep watching Romney.  I know I will.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WH3ZLMM7CUKUHUIMK4TKXW6SQE John

    IT WAS A RECORD TURNOUT.  WTF?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R36YDQSOLOYJNXDOZTA44Y2CDQ delisha

    @Pug:disqus …recunoastemm….Would you like to work from home? Read more here: LazyCash4.com and you will find out how to get a nice income every month.

  • Anonymous

    Poor Bill.  He sees the opportunity to kill Arabs and Persians slipping through his fingers.

  • Anonymous

    The bottom line is If you don’t like how the party of “NO” has held the Congress hostage, vote. If
    you are not registered – get registered­. If you didn’t vote last cycle, get
    involved and vote. Take part in local and state level politics, because the
    Toxic Erratic Activist(T­EA) Party has taken over local and state politics. Others have said it, so I’ll say it again! It’s the
    economy stupid! The TEA party squandered a golden opportunity post their
    smashing win in 2010. Rather they passed numerous anti-abortion laws nationwide.
    Now there three segments fighting each other. It
    has been very entertaining since they started dancing. And Judson Phillips
    boldly declared, “The Tea Party will never rally behind Mitt Romney.” The
    “Anyone but Romney” crowd have help splinter the once proud party of Lincoln.
    Then there is the GOP, the party of Teddy Roosevelt, which was once progressive
    to the point of “Trust Busting” and increased regulation of business. Now this
    portion has squandered their opportunity to effect great legislation. Then there
    is the Republican section, once proud Reagan-ites whom have been seriously
    compromised by the other radical divisions and therefore failed to produce any
    jobs legislation they ran on in the 2010 election. Once proud, now split and
    leader-less they wander the Iowan countryside seeking solace from those just as
    split. It has been one very entertaining primary
    season.

  • Anonymous

    the little chicken hawk warmongering zionist Kristolnacht gave us Sarah Palin and knows he will have zero input and influence in a romney admin. he would rather sit outside and throw rocks at Obama than see a republican who ignores him take power. what a loser.

  • Gloves Van Donahue

    As it turned out, the turnout was higher than last time.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FCBD4BOJC6GF25ZKGSA42LKXN4 Criddic

    Yeah 25% of the party overall for the nomination.  He won 37% of New Hamsphire’s vote.  There is a big difference.  Ron Paul got 24% of the New Hampshire vote, but only garners about 10% of the overall party vote.  Get it?

  • Anonymous

    Yes it was. With 99% reporting, 244,229 votes have been counted thus far which is well above the voter turnout in 2008.

  • Anonymous

    Yes Kristol it is true, Conservatives do not like your candidate Romney.

  • Anonymous

    No enthusiasm problem for Paul supporters

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jose-Farias/100000591902730 Jose Farias

    Sure, but Ron Paul will never win with libertarians alone. I think Kristol had a great point. Now, in both Iowa and NH the turnout was low. And I thought Tea Partiers and GOPers were on fire this election! And, by the way, if Romney or Ron Paul win, I am one voter will not be excited about voting. Well, I will not vote for Ron Paul. As for Romney, maybe I will hold my nose, I don’t know. But I am extremely disappointed, not with Romney or Ron Paul. I am disappointed with the voters. No wonder we have Obama in the WH.

  • Anonymous

    The turnout was low because everyone assumed a Romney victory.  Kristol appears to want Obama re-elected.  Obama has pleased him by overthrowing more right wing governments than Bush did.

  • Anonymous

    245,373  another MSM propaganda hit debunked

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Self-Serve Advertising | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram