Man, it looks like they stomped on her face!

This should be interesting.

It is, indeed, a horrifying video.

A “fictional, satirical comgolomeration” used as an example?

That doesn’t sell well in KY. Lexington, Franfurt and Louisville. Horses, government and business…in that order.

Whoever “disagreed” with her probably doesn’t know KY any better than her.

What about clear-topping mountains?

Patrick Henry said:
Man, it looks like they stomped on her face!

Damn, I hate to say it Patrick, but it looks like they stomped on your face too! Is that really RRK?

Keith usually just verbally stomps women.

Patrick Henry said:
Man, it looks like they stomped on her face!

I wouldn’t put up a picture of myself when making a comment like that.

It isn’t quite “a horrifying video.” But it should never have happened.

At the same time, what she did was antagonize people. If she had any clue of where she was she would have known better. Which is probably why she did it there.

You poke a stick in a fire…you will get a blaze.

And Kudos for your Halloween avatar, Patrick. It’s grotesque.

The Real Royal King said:
It is, indeed, a horrifying video.

I agree. Here’s another one:

http://biggovernment.com/sright/2009/11/30/anatomy-of-a-beat-down-part-1-why-kenneth-gladney-was-beaten-and-by-whom/

Neither one has any excuse.

I do honestly believe that the actions reflect on the people not the politician.
Neither one paints a shining example of compassion.

Finch, I would think that you are smarter than playing tit for tat. Please tell me (I didn’t click on the link) that was not what you are doing!!

Shawn Soya said:
I wouldn’t put up a picture of myself when making a comment like that.

Good point.

The Kentucky Head Stomper requests equal time !

Patrick Henry said:
Man, it looks like they stomped on her face!

I hope someone stomps on yours.

AnonymousFinch said:
I agree. Here’s another one: http://biggovernment.com/sright/2009/11/30/anatomy-of-a-beat-down-part-1-why-kenneth-gladney-was-beaten-and-by-whom/

Is there a video?

BlackWidow said:
Finch, I would think that you are smarter than playing tit for tat. Please tell me (I didn’t click on the link) that was not what you are doing!!

Why? For God’s sake why? Why is is probative when conservatives act like thugs and irrelevant when liberals do the same thing? Why? Why? Why?

SmartAlec said:
Damn, I hate to say it Patrick, but it looks like they stomped on your face too! Is that really RRK?

SmartAlec, be nice. I’m not sure, I’m just using it as my Halloween avatar.

BlackWidow said:
I hope someone stomps on yours.

Don’t be a hater!

The Real Royal King said:
Is there a video?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTXBOgPCh9w&feature=player_embedded#!

AnonymousFinch said:
Why? For God’s sake why? Why is is probative when conservatives act like thugs and irrelevant when liberals do the same thing? Why? Why? Why?

Because it is childish that is why. Oh well maybe you need to mirror your inner child here.

writer said:
Keith usually just verbally stomps women.

Even a dimwit like you would have to admit that is not as horrifying as the Attack of the Tea Partiers, Kumquat. I think it reasonable to assume the Tea Partiers are attempting to bring Phillipine style politics to America. Such assaults will become the routine. Tea Partiers – the New Terrorists!

AnonymousFinch said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTXBOgPCh9w&feature=player_embedded#!

My favorite quote from this video:

Witness: Two of you guys attacked this guy.

SEIU Thug: He attacked America, so we attacked him.

That’s just plain-old, all-American “dissent,” right TRRK?

To the contrary, King. I think this turnaround in Olbermann is long overdue. He usually shows as much respect for women as a drunken pirate. Also, King, I’m glad you’re not doing your usual on the topic of assaults, and joking that the victim was being ‘chased’. You may be turning human after all, King.

(Nah, who am I kidding?)

Attention all. KO is doing a special comment tomorrow. Now I am letting you know so you can mark your calendars and get to the store for beer and chips for the show. Don’t forget.

Contrast this troublemaker at the rally with Jindal’s aide just trying to make it to her car. But the libs are OK with that beatdown. Anyway, the party line is that there’s no proof it was the act of their protesters, even though Jindal’s aide said they followed her from Brennan’s cursing her every step of the way. The libs say that’s not enough proof. How about the steel rod in her leg? A bit worse than the little bump our protester darling got from Paul’s supporters.

BW, I put that comment on here with tongue in cheek. Do you see any injuries or marks? I think she was trying to start something to make Paul look bad. I think she most likely received much less than she deserved.

Next time she sould lean foward.

Memo to Tea Partiers.

Not all Progressives would just take the curb stomping. Some have Concealed Carry Licenses. (Allow me to look around. yep no one else in the room except the dogs.) What has has two thumbs wears an Alan Grayson shirt, and has a Concealed Weapons Permit. This Guy.

I welcome someone to try and take me out.

BlackWidow said:
Attention all. KO is doing a special comment tomorrow. Now I am letting you know so you can mark your calendars and get to the store for beer and chips for the show. Don’t forget.

I threw up a little in my mouth when I read this.

AnonymousFinch said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTXBOgPCh9w&feature=player_embedded#!

Thanks for the link. I remember this now. Very bad, indeed.

Michael A. Wojtowicz said:
I welcome someone to try and take me out.

Where in the hell did this come from?

The Real Royal King said:
Thanks for the link. I remember this now. Very bad, indeed.

Very bad, but this was just an anomaly, right? I mean, this doesn’t make SEIU “the New Terrorists!”, right?

Michael A. Wojtowicz said:
I welcome someone to try and take me out.

One . One progressive loon , Ah Ah Ah Ah Ah !

Watch the video. At least the segment on the Ed Show. When the five guys surrounded the Moveon.org girl. The quote from one of them was “We may have to take someone out”

Michael A. Wojtowicz said:
Memo to Tea Partiers. Not all Progressives would just take the curb stomping. Some have Concealed Carry Licenses. (Allow me to look around. yep no one else in the room except the dogs.) What has has two thumbs wears an Alan Grayson shirt, and has a Concealed Weapons Permit. This Guy. I welcome someone to try and take me out.

Wojtowicz belongs to a special Old Country Car Pool Group . They meet every day at work .

She’s a professional Leftist. She does that for a living – if you call it a living. One of the more colorful descriptions:
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2010/10/paid-moonbat-activist-who-lunged-at.html

So it’s all just another Liberal Lie. Funny how the media keeps not asking questions.

Michael A. Wojtowicz said:
I welcome someone to try and take me out.

I don’t think anyone is concerned enough about you to make the effort.

writer said:
To the contrary, King. I think this turnaround in Olbermann is long overdue. He usually shows as much respect for women as a drunken pirate. Also, King, I’m glad you’re not doing your usual on the topic of assaults, and joking that the victim was being ‘chased’. You may be turning human after all, King. (Nah, who am I kidding?)

Real assaults are never funny, Kumquat. Your paranoia about roving bands of African-Americans chasing you is not funny either. Now, do us all a favor and sign off. Or, sign on under one of your other personae. I am sure no one is interested in your usual trio of bleats, kvetches, moans and whines tonight. Be a good little bugger and let the grown up talk tonight.

But a 110lb. pound girl wearing a wig is?
I know it’s the Tea Party way. Free Speech and The Constitution. Unless you disagree with me, then i’ll stomp your head into to curb or mysteriously handcuff and detain you.

AnonymousFinch said:
Very bad, but this was just an anomaly, right? I mean, this doesn’t make SEIU “the New Terrorists!”, right?

Your silliness aside, have you read an update when this is actually going to trial? Why the long delay?

And since you went to all white private schools and weren’t at my school, King, how did you arrive at this conclusion? Why didn’t you go to public schools? Didn’t want to be around all those blacks that you claim to love? And not only did you go to all white schools, you named your cat after FDR, who locked up American citizens only because of their race. King, your racism is off the charts.

I think it is clear at least one man went too far but I have a couple of problems with how this is being portrayed already. The guy taking her down may have also been a bit overzealous as well but he fell, I can understand that. Foot to the shoulder guy – out of line, kudos to the man in the crowd pointing it out to him.

First, it’s guys who were trying to hold back people from getting to Paul who are involved, certain the atmosphere was rather chaotic.

Second, she bolted for Paul carrying something and wearing a disguise. Now at that point a reasonable person could be confused that this was someone who meant to harm Paul. Need I mention RFK or Wallace as examples of this very thing?

Finally, if this isn’t a honey pot set up I don’t know what is. Are we surprised she’s front and center on Olbermann? Of course not.

Michael A. Wojtowicz said:
Memo to Tea Partiers. Not all Progressives would just take the curb stomping. Some have Concealed Carry Licenses. (Allow me to look around. yep no one else in the room except the dogs.) What has has two thumbs wears an Alan Grayson shirt, and has a Concealed Weapons Permit. This Guy. I welcome someone to try and take me out.

Wojtowicz belongs to the Old Country Union . Their motto ? Every man for himself .

I’m sick of these liberal thugs. Why did she need to ram his poor defenseless boot with her head?

I am going to log off, AF. My patience with the idiot trool Kumquat is spent for the evening. I’ve always found chronic bleaters, kvetchers, moaners and whiners particularly irritting and odious. Thanks for some very thought-provoking comments. I’d like to continue our discussion in the future.

W. Guy Finley said:
I think it is clear at least one man went too far but I have a couple of problems with how this is being portrayed already. The guy taking her down may have also been a bit overzealous as well but he fell, I can understand that. Foot to the shoulder guy – out of line, kudos to the man in the crowd pointing it out to him.

First, it’s guys who were trying to hold back people from getting to Paul who are involved, certain the atmosphere was rather chaotic.

Second, she bolted for Paul carrying something and wearing a disguise. Now at that point a reasonable person could be confused that this was someone who meant to harm Paul. Need I mention RFK or Wallace as examples of this very thing?

Finally, if this isn’t a honey pot set up I don’t know what is. Are we surprised she’s front and center on Olbermann? Of course not.

The whole thing was a setup. She’s a PAID professional activist. This is what she does for a living.

The story is now about her.

You know what people, this is not about right versus left, and it’s not about MSNBC versus FOX. This is about 3 men taking down a young woman, restraining her, and stomping on her. There was nothing threatening going on other than her carrying a sign. This was an act of absolute and unequivocal cowardice. Where I come from if a man, or men hit a woman they pay for it with a shot from someone their own size.

Anyone on here supporting what happened, or making a joke about it, deserves a shot from someone their own size. It’s not a joke. Rand Paul should have apologized for the actions of anyone from his campaign who does this. He should not have walked around an apology. Anything short of an apology from Paul, or anything short of anyone suggesting that there is no apology necessary is absolutely reprehensible.

Both Old Country jokes were complete and total fails. But hey if you wanna try a third time go ahead.

I don’t know if it was a attempt at a joke using the out of business buffet chain for seniors or the ethnicity of my name. Either way, keep em coming. They are comedic genius.

The Real Royal King said:
Real assaults are never funny, Kumquat. Your paranoia about roving bands of African-Americans chasing you is not funny either. Now, do us all a favor and sign off. Or, sign on under one of your other personae. I am sure no one is interested in your usual trio of bleats, kvetches, moans and whines tonight. Be a good little bugger and let the grown up talk tonight

Three . Three grammatical errors . AH , AH , AH ,AH ,AH ,AH !

I’ve apparently driven the King off again. He wants to claim he’s streetwise, while saying he grew up like Shirley Temple. And he expects us to buy it. Aggravating, but also pathetic.

Hawk11 said:
You know what people, this is not about right versus left, and it’s not about MSNBC versus FOX. This is about 3 men taking down a young woman, restraining her, and stomping on her. There was nothing threatening going on other than her carrying a sign. This was an act of absolute and unequivocal cowardice. Where I come from if a man, or men hit a woman they pay for it with a shot from someone their own size.

Anyone on here supporting what happened, or making a joke about it, deserves a shot from someone their own size. It’s not a joke. Rand Paul should have apologized for the actions of anyone from his campaign who does this. He should not have walked around an apology. Anything short of an apology from Paul, or anything short of anyone suggesting that there is no apology necessary is absolutely reprehensible.

Read up on her, it was a setup. You and the media are falling for it.

Michael A. Wojtowicz said:
Memo to Tea Partiers. Not all Progressives would just take the curb stomping. Some have Concealed Carry Licenses. (Allow me to look around. yep no one else in the room except the dogs.) What has has two thumbs wears an Alan Grayson shirt, and has a Concealed Weapons Permit. This Guy. I welcome someone to try and take me out.

Shocking that a Grayson supporting , gun toting , dog kennel working , Tea Party threatening little man doesn’t get jokes .

Did I miss the show Olbermann did with the black tea-party member given a good-old fashioned beat-down by the Taxpayer-Funded SEIU thugs?

When Obama gave his interview on Univision did he say conservative blacks & hispanics were “enemies” also?
————————————————————–

Alert:

Progressive cities trying to “vote” to allow non-citizens to actually vote in American elections…If the lefties try that, it’s no longer a sovereign nation, and anarchy will rule.

Swing and a miss Big Eddie. Strike three. Have seat rookie.

Alz said:
Read up on her, it was a setup. You and the media are falling for it.

Understand something, this is not about anything other than the fact that this is a young woman carrying a sign who is on a mission… A political mission. I’m not denying that. This is about 3 men assaulting a defenseless woman. She was not trying to hurt anyone, she was not trying to assault anyone, she was not attempting to do anything other than get a picture with Paul with a sign.

To try and defend this in any way, shape or form shows that you condone men assaulting a defenseless woman.

Patrick Henry said:
Man, it looks like they stomped on her face!

Holy fuck look whose talking you look like an extra in Deliverance or Dale Earnhart’s retarded cousin.

Lauren Valle is another unattractive, miserable liberal female with no boyfriend or husband who will spend the rest of her lonely life fighting for the right to abort babies. She doesn’t count in the battle for what really matters in life.
She’ll probably move to some small Wyoming town some day, run for the school board and hope to spread the liberal virus.

I thought he was going to interview a woman. Who is that man?

LIbs! You magnificent sons of bitches!

Paul read your book!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Real Royal King said:
Even a dimwit like you would have to admit that is not as horrifying as the Attack of the Tea Partiers, Kumquat. I think it reasonable to assume the Tea Partiers are attempting to bring Phillipine style politics to America. Such assaults will become the routine. Tea Partiers – the New Terrorists!

King, I think KO has a new woman. She played the violin (3 million dollar) violin for him tonight. I swear I saw a twinkle in his eyes for her.

I know all of you on here just wait with bated breath for my KO updates.

notsofast said:
LIbs! You magnificent sons of bitches!

Paul read your book!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Very nice Patton allusion!

disenlightened said:
Lauren Valle is another unattractive, miserable liberal female with no boyfriend or husband who will spend the rest of her lonely life fighting for the right to abort babies. She doesn’t count in the battle for what really matters in life.She’ll probably move to some small Wyoming town some day, run for the school board and hope to spread the liberal virus.

And your point is???? None of that is any of your business.

Michael A. Wojtowicz said:
I welcome someone to try and take me out.

Can you really get out of the asylum, you rancid libby?

AnonymousFinch said:
Very nice Patton allusion!

Thank God we have some intelligent people here!

Black Widow, that wasn’t a twinkle. It’s psychosis.

KO , ed schultz ,chris matthews are all the same talking points from the white house lol ,it would be the comedy channel if they were even funny

BlackWidow said:
King, I think KO has a new woman. She played the violin (3 million dollar) violin for him tonight. I swear I saw a twinkle in his eyes for her.

I know all of you on here just wait with bated breath for my KO updates.

I think you’re right. She looks just boyish enough to grab KO’s attention. But, too bad for him, she’d probably be more interested in Maddow.

notsofast said:
I thought he was going to interview a woman. Who is that man?

You Phil have no room to talk about anyone with that head of hair you have. Talk about ugly.

notsofast said:
Can you really get out of the asylum, you rancid libby?

I so love being hated by you. Makes my day!

BlackWidow said:
And your point is???? None of that is any of your business.

Everything is my business if I decide it is. You know that.

BlackWidow said:
You Phil have no room to talk about anyone with that head of hair you have. Talk about ugly.

Is that how you show your love, BW?

Tsk, tsk, tsk!

Even if you think it was a set up the three men had no right to take her down,touch her or stomp on her head.I wonder what the story would have been if 3 big woman had did this to a little 110lb. man?

Hawk11 said:
Understand something, this is not about anything other than the fact that this is a young woman carrying a sign who is on a mission… A political mission. I’m not denying that. This is about 3 men assaulting a defenseless woman. She was not trying to hurt anyone, she was not trying to assault anyone, she was not attempting to do anything other than get a picture with Paul with a sign. To try and defend this in any way, shape or form shows that you condone men assaulting a defenseless woman.

Thank you Hawk. A sane person.

BlackWidow said:
I so love being hated by you. Makes my day!

I love you, man!

Patrick Henry said:
Man, it looks like they stomped on her face!

Asshole

Patrick Henry said:
Don’t be a hater!

Yeah Mr perfect
ASSHOLE

Hawk11 said:
She was not trying to hurt anyone, she was not trying to assault anyone,

And you know this how?

disenlightened said:
Everything is my business if I decide it is. You know that.

Oh my a “real” man thing you got going here.

nutsofast said:

OMG- It’s that pathetic lib, back again!

LMAO

notsofast said:
And you know this how?

She weights 110 lbs??? Good god!

defenseless woman, bullshit, it was wrong yes totally, be hey equal rights right

Michael A. Wojtowicz said:
Memo to Tea Partiers.

Not all Progressives would just take the curb stomping. Some have Concealed Carry Licenses. (Allow me to look around. yep no one else in the room except the dogs.) What has has two thumbs wears an Alan Grayson shirt, and has a Concealed Weapons Permit. This Guy.

I welcome someone to try and take me out.

I am a liberal and i own firearms, I can say that if that had been me I would have gone to jail.

BlackWidow said:
She played the violin (3 million dollar) violin

It was beautiful.

BlackWidow said:
She weights 110 lbs??? Good god!

I guess you have never seen Code Pink in action?

Try again, dear! Also, do you remember Squeaky Fromm? She was 110 lbs. too.

notsofast said:
I love you, man!

Hey just because I take up for Rachel doesn’[t make me a man!!!!! ;-)

ROCKSTEADY said:
It was beautiful.

I know I loved it.

notsofast said:
I guess you have never seen Code Pink in action? Try again, dear! Also, do you remember Squeaky Fromm? She was 110 lbs. too.

Hey if you would have seen her on KO you would have seen a wimp of a young girl. Three huge men to take her down!!!

BlackWidow said:
Hey if you would have seen her on KO you would have seen a wimp of a young girl. Three huge men to take her down!!!

Makes no difference how many it took. She was in disguise and who knew what she was going to do.

lazzzlo said:
It isn’t quite “a horrifying video.” But it should never have happened.

At the same time, what she did was antagonize people. If she had any clue of where she was she would have known better. Which is probably why she did it there.

You poke a stick in a fire…you will get a blaze.

Yes, the “they forced me to attack them” defense is a well established legal precedent. (Larry, Moe and Curly Joe vs. John Doe and unnamed bit part players, SCOTUS 47hUS.2t-bis, 1936)

disenlightened said:
I think you’re right. She looks just boyish enough to grab KO’s attention. But, too bad for him, she’d probably be more interested in Maddow.

Oh well that is fine with me but Maddow was in Alaska with Joe Miller.

Call_Me_Ishmael said:
Yes, the “they forced me to attack them” defense is a well established legal precedent. (Larry, Moe and Curly Joe vs. John Doe and unnamed bit part players, SCOTUS 47hUS.2t-bis, 1936)

Sorry, your lib fanatic gotten taken down.

Tooooooooooooooooooo bad!

Call_Me_Ishmael said:
Yes, the “they forced me to attack them” defense is a well established legal precedent. (Larry, Moe and Curly Joe vs. John Doe and unnamed bit part players, SCOTUS 47hUS.2t-bis, 1936)

Oh no there is NEVER NEVER an excuse to hit a woman.

Patrick Henry said:
BW, I put that comment on here with tongue in cheek. Do you see any injuries or marks? I think she was trying to start something to make Paul look bad. I think she most likely received much less than she deserved.

Patric Henry = condoning violence to women
Big F-ing JERK

BlackWidow said:
Oh no there is NEVER NEVER an excuse to hit a woman.

No one hit her.

Why do you libs always take something to the lying stage?

notsofast said:
Makes no difference how many it took. She was in disguise and who knew what she was going to do.

Come on she had a wig on like your and that was it. That was a disguise. Don’t tell me you are a woman beater. Please

nutsofast said:
Patric Henry = condoning violence to women
Big F-ing JERK

You prove what losers libs are.

You are so sad , you can’t even have your own identity!

LMAO!

notsofast said:
No one hit her. Why do you libs always take something to the lying stage?

OK put their foot on her.

BlackWidow said:
Don’t tell me you are a woman beater. Please

Ahhhhhhhhhhh, she wasn’t beaten and she was lucky she wasn’t.

BTW, Sirhan Sirhan weighed about 110 lbs.

bullshit black widow i thought equal rights was you style, why is there never a excuse

notsofast said:
I guess you have never seen Code Pink in action? Try again, dear! Also, do you remember Squeaky Fromm? She was 110 lbs. too.

I love code pink. But they were nothing compared to Hillary’s women in the 2008 camapaign. Remember druken Harriet? She was a scream.

Oh my reading my last comment I believe that I have had one two many myself. LOL

cd ohio said:
bullshit black widow i thought equal rights was you style, why is there never a excuse

I believe in equal rights. But I see women everyday that have been beat by men. Yes, some women can be a little nutty but never enough to get beat.

so if she is armed with say a gun or knife it is wrong, i will alert the secret service

no not beaten hit

cd ohio said:
why is there never a excuse

I agree with this.If someone is hittin on me no matter who i would defend myself.But just to wallup on someone smaller is always wronge no matter what the sex.

BlackWidow said:
Yes, some women can be a little nutty but never enough to get beat.

Well, when Mediaite posts an article about a woman being beaten , you can bring that up.

just playing the devil’s advocate, yes things are wrong but not everything fits a absolute

Is this what the tea partiers mean by “Man Up”? Real manly men there, ganging up and stomping on a little girl because her sign makes fun of your candidate. Family values all the way. Know how they could tell her sign was anti tea party? It didn’t have any spelling errors..

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh, poor libs, she fell!

“The first involved a woman who is a member of http://www.moveon.org and who was determined to pose in front of Rand Paul holding a sign that read “Rand Paul Republicore: Employee of the Month.” According to police, the woman, identified by The Associated Press as Lauren Valle, said she tripped and fell on the ground after someone grabbed her blonde wig off her head.”

The second occurred after a Conway supporter stepped on the foot of a female Rand supporter, who recently had foot surgery, according to police.

The woman was wearing a surgical boot, but after the injury, her incision was cut open. Police say she refused medical treatment and also filed an assault report.

Hey KO- why was the second woman not on your show?

ProgLib said:
Is this what the tea partiers mean by “Man Up”?

Well, apparently this woman took the term “man -up” literally!!

Hawk11 said:
Understand something, this is not about anything other than the fact that this is a young woman carrying a sign who is on a mission… A political mission. I’m not denying that. This is about 3 men assaulting a defenseless woman. She was not trying to hurt anyone, she was not trying to assault anyone, she was not attempting to do anything other than get a picture with Paul with a sign.

To try and defend this in any way, shape or form shows that you condone men assaulting a defenseless woman.

FALSE! The whole thing was premeditated. She did her JOB and she did it to get on TV/internet and to rile people up.

The story is about her. Who paid her? Who was behind it? Were there other accomplices there?

It was a bit distracting that Valle was being interviewed by a man who regularly refers to any woman disagreeing with him as an ‘idiot’, a ‘bimbo’, or a ‘lip sticked bag of meat.’

notsofast said:
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh, poor libs, she fell!

AHHHH! That C&P came right from NewsBusters. Such a credible source. It’s no wonder you never give a link to your C&Ps. You don’t want people to know the BS propaganda you lap up as truth.

She didn’t deserve it, but is probably getting free drinks from KOS kids for a year. She got what she wanted, what the team needed. Expect her on the Today show tomorrow, the guy beaten by SEIU, not so much.

King says:

It is, indeed, a horrifying video.

I assume you mean the olbermann interview. You’re right, that was horrifying!

That avatar showing the King’s face is also horrifying.

david r says:
Contrast this troublemaker at the rally with Jindal’s aide just trying to make it to her car. But the libs are OK with that beatdown.

I posed that earilier David, along with the Gladney beatdown and the obamacare protester who got his finger bitten off by a rabid lib. The libs actually told me not to believe my lyin eyes. That’s how they roll!

The real danger of a liberal bite is not the size of the wound, but the bacterial infection afterward. Like a Komodo dragon.

BlackWidow says:

Oh no there is NEVER NEVER an excuse to hit a woman.

Speaking as a woman, i disagree. If you hit a guy for no reason, you should expect to get hit back. If you want equality for women, take all of it.

Seeing November From My Window said:
Speaking as a woman, i disagree. If you hit a guy for no reason, you should expect to get hit back.

Where did you see this woman hit any of those men? I don’t condone any violence at any event no matter what party it comes from. It amazes me how you RWers will make excuse after excuse for those men that put her down and stomped on her.

What happened to this woman was a disgrace and the guys who touched her should be arrested. I also believe that black man who was beaten at a tea party rally by union thugs should also have his day in court. The media never covered that attack which was much, much worse than this event. I wish the media was fair and reported all bad behavior, not just the behavior of people they disagree with. Another strike against the dying journalism the USA has today.

Seeing November From My Window said: If you hit a guy for no reason, you should expect to get hit back. If you want equality for women, take all of it.

the real john t said:
Where did you see this woman hit any of those men? I don’t condone any violence at any event no matter what party it comes from. It amazes me how you RWers will make excuse after excuse for those men that put her down and stomped on her.

wow, she was obviously talking about equal rights for women in general and not referring to the incident.

Yes I was Kird. John often speaks without thinking first. If’s a reflex.

Seeing November From My Window said:
Yes I was Kird. John often speaks without thinking first. If’s a reflex.

been to another comment section here where the same thing happened.

Another SET-UP from the SCUM @ Moveon!!!

Here’s the loathsome, contemptible character of the Democratic Left (from move.on’s site):

” Here’s some tips to help you earn the best media coverage possible:

Be flexible. You’ll want to have a plan, but be ready to adapt and make quick decisions on-the-fly.

Find the Republican candidate. Our interaction with the Republican candidate will be the most media-worthy part of the event. Don’t expect to get very close while carrying signs or an over-sized certificate, but instead get a pair of people (the RepubliCorp spokesperon and a videographer or photographer) to join the greeting line, and present a small version of the award to the candidate.

Find the media and go to them. Your action is for the media. Our goal is to reach undecided or swing voters with a message about the RepubliCorps takeover of Congress. For that reason, everything you do should be for the media, or for taking our own video and pictures that we then share. You don’t need to engage or persuade anyone at Republican events, and you should avoid spending time talking to them.

Stage a scene for Republican candidate’s supporters. The reactions of a candidate’s supporters to the RepubliCorp brand is a compelling part of the event. Try to position at least one scene near or in the crowd of supporters, and try to capture their response to your action on video. ”

You can’t reason with DECEITFUL people, you must DEFEAT them!

————————————————————– 11-02-10 —————————————————————–

I believe the story that they thought the person was a threat to Rand. The are yelling for the police the entire time, they pull the wig off, and it reveals what appears to be a man from the back – which is where the two were that went after her. The guy that went down with her fell, and took her down with him. The guy that stepped on her shoulder was behind her, and might have thought she was a dude, too.

She doesn’t offer any proof that they knew who she was – she even said they heard someone say they were doing crowd control, and might have to take someone out. That sounds to me like they knew that people might get out of control, and it might be an unsafe environment. The people calling for police are because of her actions – not because of what is happening to her, in my opinion. They are calling for police before she goes down.

I think the crowd was concerned about the actions of a wig wearing person lunging at a candidate. This is what they do. Of course it looks bad to see what happened, but as an activist she knew what she was doing, and she went in there looking for trouble. Conservatives know that the left is capable of violence – they attacked Kenneth Gladney, they attacked Allee Bautsch and her boyfriend – it isn’t any surprise that it might happen again. If this woman didn’t want to get involved in a violent tussle, she shouldn’t have lunged at a candidate, wearing a wig, in the middle of a crowd.

The guy was wrong to step on her, but I don’t fault the guy who took her down.

Obama Supporters Attack Sarah Palin Motorcade

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeVBaM2lQsg

And the cops take ‘em out. Granted, Rand’s supporters aren’t cops, but they did call for the cops, and they did the same thing the police did here.

NORBIT said:
Stage a scene for Republican candidate’s supporters. The reactions of a candidate’s supporters to the RepubliCorp brand is a compelling part of the event. Try to position at least one scene near or in the crowd of supporters, and try to capture their response to your action on video.

That’s exactly what she did….

sarainitaly said:
I believe the story that they thought the person was a threat to Rand. The are yelling for the police the entire time, they pull the wig off, and it reveals what appears to be a man from the back – which is where the two were that went after her. The guy that went down with her fell, and took her down with him. The guy that stepped on her shoulder was behind her, and might have thought she was a dude, too. She doesn’t offer any proof that they knew who she was – she even said they heard someone say they were doing crowd control, and might have to take someone out. That sounds to me like they knew that people might get out of control, and it might be an unsafe environment. The people calling for police are because of her actions – not because of what is happening to her, in my opinion. They are calling for police before she goes down. I think the crowd was concerned about the actions of a wig wearing person lunging at a candidate. This is what they do. Of course it looks bad to see what happened, but as an activist she knew what she was doing, and she went in there looking for trouble. Conservatives know that the left is capable of violence – they attacked Kenneth Gladney, they attacked Allee Bautsch and her boyfriend – it isn’t any surprise that it might happen again. If this woman didn’t want to get involved in a violent tussle, she shouldn’t have lunged at a candidate, wearing a wig, in the middle of a crowd. The guy was wrong to step on her, but I don’t fault the guy who took her down.

There’s more accuracy & truth in your summation and analyses than you’re ever going to see on any of the Democratic networks!! – CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS NPR (if I haven’t said so today, THANK YOU NPR!), and the fully-owned subsidiary of msnbc.

http://www.breitbart.tv/okeefe-teachers-gone-wild/
———————————————————————-
TEACHERS GONE WILD! (video, cut/paste above)

Wanna’ see what the NJ Teachers Union thinks of YOU, the taxpayer?

…and the Democratic networks in Philly – local affiliates – are trying to discredit the filmaker!

You simply can’t trust the network media anymore. They CONSTANTLY attempt to mislead and manipulate public opinion to promote a left-wing ’social justice’ agenda that has failed wherever it’s been tried!
—————————————————————-

Don’t take my word; watch the actual, unedited footage, then watch the news coverage!

It exposes the news-media charlatans for just what they are!!!

They knew who she was, which is why they attempted to prevent her from speaking with Paul.

Shameful, people, defending grown men assaulting a woman.

It all comes down to this. She disagrees with Paul by displaying a sign saying so, his supporters respond by using violence. Regardless who is behind her message those are the facts. That so many of you think it’s defensible to react to someone who disagrees with you in this way speaks volumes.

He should go to jail.

sarainitaly said:
I believe the story that they thought the person was a threat to Rand. The are yelling for the police the entire time, they pull the wig off, and it reveals what appears to be a man from the back – which is where the two were that went after her. The guy that went down with her fell, and took her down with him. The guy that stepped on her shoulder was behind her, and might have thought she was a dude, too.

She doesn’t offer any proof that they knew who she was – she even said they heard someone say they were doing crowd control, and might have to take someone out. That sounds to me like they knew that people might get out of control, and it might be an unsafe environment. The people calling for police are because of her actions – not because of what is happening to her, in my opinion. They are calling for police before she goes down.

I think the crowd was concerned about the actions of a wig wearing person lunging at a candidate. This is what they do. Of course it looks bad to see what happened, but as an activist she knew what she was doing, and she went in there looking for trouble. Conservatives know that the left is capable of violence – they attacked Kenneth Gladney, they attacked Allee Bautsch and her boyfriend – it isn’t any surprise that it might happen again. If this woman didn’t want to get involved in a violent tussle, she shouldn’t have lunged at a candidate, wearing a wig, in the middle of a crowd.

The guy was wrong to step on her, but I don’t fault the guy who took her down.

So, Tumbleweed, would it quench your bloodthirst if the Paul campaign had tied Ms. Valle to the bumper and pulled her down the street for several blocks, or do you think the Paul thugs should have simply shot her dead on the spot? I want to make sure we get the level of political violence you and Michelle-in-Utah are advocating correct. As a basically peaceful person not accustomed to the type of political violence you desire, I don’t think I can come up with this myself.

I once read about elections in Manila. People ad to pick grocery stores in which the grocer was supporting their candidate lest shoppers be shot while checking out an barbers of the same political persuasion lest your throat be slashed. In moving into this system you seem to be advocating, should we perhaps have official party colours so that we might not be mistaken. Normally, I wouldn’t ask for a foreigner’s input in these matters, but since you have interjected yourself into American politics, I assume you regard these as fair questions?

BR said:
He should go to jail.

You are mistaken. Tumbleweed thinks he should get a Kennedy Center Award.

Some_Dude said:
They knew who she was, which is why they attempted to prevent her from speaking with Paul.

Shameful, people, defending grown men assaulting a woman.

That is the essence of this story. It needs no embellishment.

ProgLib said:
It all comes down to this. She disagrees with Paul by displaying a sign saying so, his supporters respond by using violence. Regardless who is behind her message those are the facts. That so many of you think it’s defensible to react to someone who disagrees with you in this way speaks volumes.

What if it was Biden or Hillary? What would the Secret Service have done?

The story is Lauren Valle and not Rand Paul. Lauren Valle perpetrated this to divert attention from the issues. She is a professional and it was premeditated.

Alz said:
What if it was Biden or Hillary? What would the Secret Service have done?

The story is Lauren Valle and not Rand Paul. Lauren Valle perpetrated this to divert attention from the issues. She is a professional and it was premeditated.

Then Paul’s jack-booted thugs stomping her wasn’t sufficient. She ought to be crucified.

The Real Royal King said:
Such assaults will become the routine.

Prove it, or is just another in a long line of BS that spews from the queen’s piehole? My guess is the latter, cumquat.

I wonder where all these libbies were when this was happening? Sending in their SEIU donations?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wr_4ZWEFOjQ

Prove something that you predict is going to happen based upon current trends. But that I could do that, Peacock60.

By the way, the fact that you can come up with other deplorable incidents of political violence doesn’t excuse the vicious, malicious assault on this young woman. You’re not suggesting that, are you? You’re not taking the Tumbleweed/Michelle-in-Utah line that political violence can always be excused, are you?

The Real Royal King said:
Even a dimwit like you would have to admit that is not as horrifying as the Attack of the Tea Partiers, Kumquat. I think it reasonable to assume the Tea Partiers are attempting to bring Phillipine style politics to America. Such assaults will become the routine. Tea Partiers – the New Terrorists!

Nice blanket throw, fool.

The Real Royal King said:
By the way, the fact that you can come up with other deplorable incidents of political violence doesn’t excuse the vicious, malicious assault on this young woman. You’re not suggesting that, are you? You’re not taking the Tumbleweed/Michelle-in-Utah line that political violence can always be excused, are you?

Only the royal queen of absurd projection would think of that. Did I utter anything that would excuse it?,no. Another projection. By your logic, I guess I can say the same thing about all dems now can’t I? Prove?, wrong question to ask the queen, didn’t we go down this road before? Remember?, I know it’s tough you have so many absurd and ridiculous comments posted, but it had something with you muslims and Japanese internment. I believe you ran away on that one.

any of you asshats actually watch the video?? pretty sad that this is how 3rd world and backwards our country is goin.. Fuck, who said the stone age arabs treat their women badly. Look no further than the yokels in Kentucky who love their bullshit constitution!! Since when did it become ok to tackle a woman half your size and then pput your foot on her head? And I thought Rand Paul and his crew were something close to Ron Paul.. I suppose this apple fell waaaay far off.. or did it really?

Penguin60 said:
Only the royal queen of absurd projection would think of that. Did I utter anything that would excuse it?,no. Another projection. By your logic, I guess I can say the same thing about all dems now can’t I? Prove?, wrong question to ask the queen, didn’t we go down this road before? Remember?, I know it’s tough you have so many absurd and ridiculous comments posted, but it had something with you muslims and Japanese internment. I believe you ran away on that one.

Your diversions are usually slicker than this. Early, I suppose.

I’ve been stomped before, and if this qualifies as a stomp…I’m a pickled sardine. These lads,actually showed considerably more restraint, then the police would have in a similar situation. Fraudcasters, like Olbermann and his cronies in liberal media (and there are certainly a few in conservative media), sustain their fraudcasting careers with such embellishments. Mr Olbermann, I’d love to have you and that Michael Moore parasite, join me at a stomping fest anywhere…anytime. You are a disgrace to your profession, and a disgrace as a human being.

The Real Royal King said:
Your diversions are usually slicker than this. Early, I suppose.

Truth = diversion in the royal world of absurdia.

goldmind said:
I’ve been stomped before, and if this qualifies as a stomp…I’m a pickled sardine. These lads,actually showed considerably more restraint, then the police would have in a similar situation. Fraudcasters, like Olbermann and his cronies in liberal media (and there are certainly a few in conservative media), sustain their fraudcasting careers with such embellishments. Mr Olbermann, I’d love to have you and that Michael Moore parasite, join me at a stomping fest anywhere…anytime. You are a disgrace to your profession, and a disgrace as a human being.

Olbermann should be a poster child for mental disorders. Maybe some drug company can use his shows in their ads? Can you imagine the outtakes?

Seeing November From My Window said:
BlackWidow says: Oh no there is NEVER NEVER an excuse to hit a woman. Speaking as a woman, i disagree. If you hit a guy for no reason, you should expect to get hit back. If you want equality for women, take all of it.

You Michele=in-Utah are one sick woman.

BlackWidow said:
Finch, I would think that you are smarter than playing tit for tat. Please tell me (I didn’t click on the link) that was not what you are doing!!

Haven’t you figured out yet that he is the bizarro world Atticus Finch. Where Atticus Finch fought for truth and the little guy, Anonymous fights for the opposite.

sarainitaly said:
I believe the story that they thought the person was a threat to Rand. The are yelling for the police the entire time, they pull the wig off, and it reveals what appears to be a man from the back – which is where the two were that went after her. The guy that went down with her fell, and took her down with him. The guy that stepped on her shoulder was behind her, and might have thought she was a dude, too. She doesn’t offer any proof that they knew who she was – she even said they heard someone say they were doing crowd control, and might have to take someone out. That sounds to me like they knew that people might get out of control, and it might be an unsafe environment. The people calling for police are because of her actions – not because of what is happening to her, in my opinion. They are calling for police before she goes down. I think the crowd was concerned about the actions of a wig wearing person lunging at a candidate. This is what they do. Of course it looks bad to see what happened, but as an activist she knew what she was doing, and she went in there looking for trouble. Conservatives know that the left is capable of violence – they attacked Kenneth Gladney, they attacked Allee Bautsch and her boyfriend – it isn’t any surprise that it might happen again. If this woman didn’t want to get involved in a violent tussle, she shouldn’t have lunged at a candidate, wearing a wig, in the middle of a crowd. The guy was wrong to step on her, but I don’t fault the guy who took her down.

Sara (who loves America so much she lives in a foreign country where she benefits from government healthcare) is so blinded by her hatred for the other side that she makes excuses for thugs beating up a woman.

Seeing November From My Window said:
Speaking as a woman, i disagree. If you hit a guy for no reason, you should expect to get hit back. If you want equality for women, take all of it.

I would never hit a woman, even a woman as hateful as you.

Jonathan Scott said:
Holy fuck look whose talking you look like an extra in Deliverance or Dale Earnhart’s retarded cousin.

Is my avatar that bad?

JamesA1102 said:
I would never hit a woman, even a woman as hateful as you.

Good for you. You were raised right! Rather frightening Michelle-in-Utah is raising a son.

Seeing November From My Window said:
BlackWidow says:

Oh no there is NEVER NEVER an excuse to hit a woman.

Speaking as a woman, i disagree. If you hit a guy for no reason, you should expect to get hit back. If you want equality for women, take all of it.

http://www.archive.org/details/Bull.Busters.Violent.Women

Lauren Valle, while we didn’t see her hit anyone, she did act in an aggressive manner, lunging at a candidate, wearing a disguise. Like I said above, they thought her a threat. She is not an innocent delicate flower who was minding her own business and assaulted out of the blue. People need to take ownership of their actions – she is a paid activist, and set out on a mission, as outlined by Norbit above.

The left didn’t give a rats ass about Kenneth Gladney who WAS minding his own business, and they didn’t care AT ALL about Allee who did NOTHING and was violently assaulted and brutally injured. It’s funny they are now *outraged*.

This incident appears almost identical to the McCain protester that rushed him, and was taken down by a bodyguard. It looks like they both tripped and took the women down with them. The only difference is the man that stepped on Lauren, which I said he shouldn’t have done.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/anti-protester-tackled-to-the-ground-in-front-of-john-mccain/

Same actions though – rush a candidate (or pol) and get tackled. Women are quite capable of committing violent acts.

sarainitaly said:
http://www.archive.org/details/Bull.Busters.Violent.Women

Lauren Valle, while we didn’t see her hit anyone, she did act in an aggressive manner, lunging at a candidate, wearing a disguise. Like I said above, they thought her a threat. She is not an innocent delicate flower who was minding her own business and assaulted out of the blue. People need to take ownership of their actions – she is a paid activist, and set out on a mission, as outlined by Norbit above.

The left didn’t give a rats ass about Kenneth Gladney who WAS minding his own business, and they didn’t care AT ALL about Allee who did NOTHING and was violently assaulted and brutally injured. It’s funny they are now *outraged*.

This incident appears almost identical to the McCain protester that rushed him, and was taken down by a bodyguard. It looks like they both tripped and took the women down with them. The only difference is the man that stepped on Lauren, which I said he shouldn’t have done.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/anti-protester-tackled-to-the-ground-in-front-of-john-mccain/

Same actions though – rush a candidate (or pol) and get tackled. Women are quite capable of committing violent acts.

So, you still haven’t addressed the question, Tumbleweed. Do you favor merely tying the young, petite Ms. Valle to a bumper and dragging her around the blog, or should we go for something with more finality like a stoning or crucifixion? W would satisfy your sense of justice?

blog = block
W = what

sarainitaly said:
Same actions though – rush a candidate (or pol) and get tackled. Women are quite capable of committing violent acts.

http://crime.about.com/od/murder/p/squeaky.htm

Or do we lament that more should have been done? Is that what you want queen of absurdia?

Unlike Royal King, I would never make light of someone being assaulted just because I disagree with them politically.

QUESTION: Has Keith Olbermann ever interviewed William Rice or Kenneth Gladney?

The Real Royal King said:
So, you still haven’t addressed the question, Tumbleweed. Do you favor merely tying the young, petite Ms. Valle to a bumper and dragging her around the blog, or should we go for something with more finality like a stoning or crucifixion? W would satisfy your sense of justice?

Given the information we know about this Leftist, your question doesn’t make sense. If this Lauren Valle (the terrible Leftist) was just an innocent player, then you might have some ground to stand on.

But we know she acted in a premeditated fashion, disguised herself and hid her intentions. Surely, you have the intelligence to distinguish the issues.

the real john t said:
AHHHH! That C&P came right from NewsBusters. Such a credible source. It’s no wonder you never give a link to your C&Ps. You don’t want people to know the BS propaganda you lap up as truth.

It came from WCPO on-line, you cretin.

Alz said:
Given the information we know about this Leftist, your question doesn’t make sense. If this Lauren Valle (the terrible Leftist) was just an innocent player, then you might have some ground to stand on.

But we know she acted in a premeditated fashion, disguised herself and hid her intentions. Surely, you have the intelligence to distinguish the issues.

So, answer the question. Tie her up to the car bumper and drag her about? Stone her? Crucify her?

Alz said:
What if it was Biden or Hillary? What would the Secret Service have done?

The story is Lauren Valle and not Rand Paul. Lauren Valle perpetrated this to divert attention from the issues. She is a professional and it was premeditated.

You are holding her responsible for getting stomped on. She went there to protest Rand Paul, she was assaulted in return. Do you blame rape victims too? Also should trained professional Secret Service people be compared to volunteer thugs who take the law in their own hands? Is she threatening anyone in any way while she’s already lying on the asphalt? Who she is is totally irrelevant, you don’t do this to people.

Thou shalt not criticize any action of the Tea Party.
They are noble patriots being infiltrated by insidious malcontents.

AnonymousFinch says:
“Why? For God’s sake why? Why is is probative when conservatives act like thugs and irrelevant when liberals do the same thing?”

I’ve only heard that expressed once in my life: right here when Finch wrote it.

Alz said:
“Lauren Valle perpetrated this to divert attention from the issues.”

I didn’t believe anyone would be so stupid and sick as to try to make this claim, but then I often underestimate the mendacity of reactionaries like Alz.

It’s interesting to note that they started this clip from the moment Mr.Paul exited his vehicle instead of showing the entire video where you would have seen this idiot-women run up to the vehicle and try to shove a sign in the open window and into Mr.Paul’s face. Of course, that wouldn’t fit the scenario Mr.Olbermann was looking for. The man that stomped on her head should be arrested for assault and battery but, this women also should be investigated for an attempted physical assault on Mr.Paul.

CAconservative says:
“It’s interesting to note that they started this clip from the moment Mr.Paul exited his vehicle instead of showing the entire video where you would have seen this idiot-women run up to the vehicle and try to shove a sign in the open window and into Mr.Paul’s face. ”

Why would she have tried that? (She didn’t.) She wanted to be video taped holding her sign near Paul, with him in the shot. You’re allegation is baseless, but we have come to expect that from conservatives for where ever.

Two men should be arrested; the thug who wrestled her to the ground and the thug who stepped on her head. The guy who was with her needs to get a couple of balls installed. He should have had his fist implanted in someones face for assaulting his friend.

CAconservative, you should be investigated for an attempted written attempt on the truth.

ProgLib said:
You are holding her responsible for getting stomped on. She went there to protest Rand Paul, she was assaulted in return. Do you blame rape victims too? Also should trained professional Secret Service people be compared to volunteer thugs who take the law in their own hands? Is she threatening anyone in any way while she’s already lying on the asphalt? Who she is is totally irrelevant, you don’t do this to people.

You liberals are dense (and hypocritical). IT WAS A SETUP. We don’t know exactly what happened, but we do know a) that she practiced it and b) she INTENDED to evoke a response.

You are acting like she is innocent. She was in disguise, too. Wake up.

If she did that to Obama, Biden or Hillary, she would have been shot., It’s amazing how idiotic you liberals are.

CAconservative said:
It’s interesting to note that they started this clip from the moment Mr.Paul exited his vehicle instead of showing the entire video where you would have seen this idiot-women run up to the vehicle and try to shove a sign in the open window and into Mr.Paul’s face. Of course, that wouldn’t fit the scenario Mr.Olbermann was looking for. The man that stomped on her head should be arrested for assault and battery but, this women also should be investigated for an attempted physical assault on Mr.Paul.

The deep-down Liberals are not interested in the truth. All they know is that Rand must be evil so they will do anything to stop him. They are not civil people. (The regular liberals out there seem unaware and unintersted in this information.)

This Lauren has a mental disorder. Normally, people debate civilly and use the voting booth to make a point. These people don’t like to follow the rules.

ProgLib said:
You are holding her responsible for getting stomped on. She went there to protest Rand Paul, she was assaulted in return. Do you blame rape victims too? Also should trained professional Secret Service people be compared to volunteer thugs who take the law in their own hands? Is she threatening anyone in any way while she’s already lying on the asphalt? Who she is is totally irrelevant, you don’t do this to people.

GlennBeckReview said:
CAconservative says:
“It’s interesting to note that they started this clip from the moment Mr.Paul exited his vehicle instead of showing the entire video where you would have seen this idiot-women run up to the vehicle and try to shove a sign in the open window and into Mr.Paul’s face. ”

Why would she have tried that? (She didn’t.) She wanted to be video taped holding her sign near Paul, with him in the shot. You’re allegation is baseless, but we have come to expect that from conservatives for where ever.

She shoved her sign into the passenger side of his car, hitting him in the face or head – the allegation is not baseless – it is on video for all to see.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiLeud-sxrM

She instigated the violence and posed a threat.

Alz says:
“This Lauren has a mental disorder. Normally, people debate civilly and use the voting booth to make a point. These people don’t like to follow the rules.”

You’ve never heard of street theater? The only people who didn’t follow the rules (laws) were the thugs who took her down and stepped on her head.

So EXTREMISTS like Alz (Are you sure you’re not Gordon Blowhard?) are now finding ways to rationalize thuggery. When Beck kept showing the clip of the union people going after the anti-health care reform guy in the street from two summers ago, I never once tried to rationalize their behavior. It was wrong then; it was wrong Monday night. If there’s a mental disorder to be called out, it is in people who rationalize criminal assault and battery. Alz, that be you.

GlennBeckReview said:
The only people who didn’t follow the rules (laws) were the thugs who took her down and stepped on her head.

wrong again.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiLeud-sxrM

GlennBeckReview said:
“The only people who didn’t follow the rules (laws) were the thugs who took her down and stepped on her head.”

sarainitaly says:
“wrong again.”

I know that different people can watch the same thing and see different things. I saw her going up to his car door window and showing him the sign. How is that breaking the rules or the law?

In other words, Sara in LaLaLand, what do you see when you look at that video? How is Lauren breaking the law there?

you see her showing the sign ,others see her shoving in his face and hit him in the head

GlennBeckReview said:
I saw her going up to his car door window and showing him the sign. How is that breaking the rules or the law?

Of course you do. Sane people see her shove the sign through the window, smacking him in the face or head – which is assault.

cd ohio says: “others see her shoving in his face and hit him in the head”

She was trying to turn the sign around. Paul didn’t say anything about being hit AND those who attacked her were well aware of who she was and what they were going to do. The attack on her was premeditated.

Sara in LaLaLand, at least you have company.

GlennBeckReview said:
She was trying to turn the sign around. Paul didn’t say anything about being hit AND those who attacked her were well aware of who she was and what they were going to do. The attack on her was premeditated.

and your proof is where, exactly?

i’ll save you the trouble – you don’t have any. She assaulted him, shoving something through his window. The only premeditation was on her part.

how did they know, mindreaders, no mshe told them lol, what they did to her was wrong not doubt, but look at everything, just was watching chris matthews do you think he showed both videos? And according to ed schultz Rand paul didnt say anything just a statement. you can argue little shit all day long

GlennBeckReview said:
“She was trying to turn the sign around. Paul didn’t say anything about being hit AND those who attacked her were well aware of who she was and what they were going to do. The attack on her was premeditated.”

sarainitaly says:
“and your proof is where, exactly?
I’ll save you the trouble – you don’t have any. She assaulted him, shoving something through his window. The only premeditation was on her part.”

I take it that you didn’t listen to this video clip. My proof is what Lauren said. Try listening to this Olbermann clip. Did you hear Paul say anything about getting hit in the face? He’s talking in this and said nothing about getting hit in the face. She assaulted Paul? How come Paul didn’t acknowledge it. He could have said something. No one had a gun to Paul’s head when he spoke in this clip.

So you “see” something in this video that Paul, who was there, didn’t see. And Lauren describes how the assault on her was mentioned in advance. LISTEN TO THE DAMN CLIP: there’s my proof.

Biased assimilation: it will make a fool out of you.

GBR only sees what he want , my proof is what she says lol

bias, look in the mirror

ed schultz is a fool, this show is funny

GlennBeckReview said:
Alz says:
“This Lauren has a mental disorder. Normally, people debate civilly and use the voting booth to make a point. These people don’t like to follow the rules.”

You’ve never heard of street theater? The only people who didn’t follow the rules (laws) were the thugs who took her down and stepped on her head.

So EXTREMISTS like Alz (Are you sure you’re not Gordon Blowhard?) are now finding ways to rationalize thuggery. When Beck kept showing the clip of the union people going after the anti-health care reform guy in the street from two summers ago, I never once tried to rationalize their behavior. It was wrong then; it was wrong Monday night. If there’s a mental disorder to be called out, it is in people who rationalize criminal assault and battery. Alz, that be you.

This wacko Lauren is the thug. Did she apologize for her behavior? Of course not. It was very uncivil behavior.

It’s really funny watching liberal defend her.

…almost as funny as watching liberals defend Islam in relation to the Victory Mosque in NYC. I can’t wait for Christmas to see the very same liberals defend nativity scenes, etc.

You have zero credibility.

Remember, Smart * Wrong = Wrong.

GlennBeckReview said:
LISTEN TO THE DAMN CLIP: there’s my proof.

nope, you’re wrong.

sarainitaly says:
“nope, you’re wrong.”

Look Sara in LaLaLand, she was not tackled after the clip you link to. If she has assaulted Paul then, as you assert, Paul’s thugs would have tackled her right then, but they didn’t .

She then went on around the back of the vehicle, around the front and approached Paul after he’d gotten out of the car, just as she claimed in the clip above. That was when Paul’s thugs assaulted her.

There is no bias in this assessment. If you were right in your bumpkin, always reactionary analysis, then Valle would not have been allowed to go on around his vehicle and approach him again.

How do you liars sleep at night? Heavy drugs?

Right wing media watchdogs, MRC, refers to brutal attack of political activist as “restraining.”

Are there no adults on the right besides Klinghoffer?

http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2010/08/conservative-david-klinghoffer-takes.html

GlennBeckReview said:
Look Sara in LaLaLand, she was not tackled after the clip you link to. If she has assaulted Paul then, as you assert, Paul’s thugs would have tackled her right then, but they didn’t .

She then went on around the back of the vehicle, around the front and approached Paul after he’d gotten out of the car, just as she claimed in the clip above. That was when Paul’s thugs assaulted her.

There is no bias in this assessment. If you were right in your bumpkin, always reactionary analysis, then Valle would not have been allowed to go on around his vehicle and approach him again.

How do you liars sleep at night? Heavy drugs?

She omitted the fact that she thrust her sign through his car window, portrayed herself as an innocent bystander, and was proved anything but. The fact that she managed to escape when security pulled her away from the car window, and that she managed to run around the front of the car, and run towards Rand doesn’t do anything to help her, and doesn’t prove anything in her favor. If anything, it shows they were remarkably restrained when she first went to lunge at him, and thrust a sign at his head.

She made the first move – a threatening one, thrusting a wooden pole through the window of a moving vehicle, and was pulled off. She managed to get away, and ran around the car, making another threatening move towards a candidate. She was wearing a wig, and had a hoodie pulled over her head, and was running towards a candidate – she was a threat. And her repeated efforts and actions only made her seem more so.

Her story is BS, and she was acting like a deranged and dangerous loon.

“always reactionary analysis” –
http://www.mediaite.com/online/president-obama-has-book-thrown-at-him-during-campaign-stop/#comment-172576

GlennBeckReview said:
How do you liars sleep at night? Heavy drugs?

who’s lying? besides you, that is.

sarainitaly says:
“She omitted the fact that she thrust her sign through his car window, portrayed herself as an innocent bystander, and was proved anything but. ”

She didn’t do either of these things. She was turning her sign around so Paul could see it, not “thrust her sign through is car window.” Again, Paul himself, said nothing about her, had not noticed her “thrust.”

Your bigger lie is how she portrayed herself. She told Olbermann (you still haven’t bothered listening to this video clip) exactly what she was doing.

So I ask you again, liar from LaLaLand, how the hell do you sleep at night? How do you rationalize this brutality?

You want to go back to 19th Century government and let the transnational corporations buy our Congress, outsource your job and despoil the environment? Fine; you’re a tool. But there is no honest way you can rationalized Valle being stomped on by a thug who then wants her to apologize to him. If you think you should make that rationalization, then welcome to Germany, circa 1938.

sarainitaly says:
“who’s lying? besides you, that is.”

Lying about what? You say she was thrusting her sign through the window. I see her turning the sign around so Paul can see it.

Apparently you’ve never gotten up off the couch to do any real political activism. I have. I understand what she was trying to do, and what you’re accusing her of makes no sense.

More to the point, how do you rationalize the brutality after the sign-through-the-window (as you see it) was over? The thugs didn’t respond to her for that; they didn’t want her to succeed with her objective, to get video taped showing Paul that sign. Paul is clearly supporting 19th Century political-economics, and what she was doing was trying to expose the Republicorp connection. Beck is in on the Republicorp take-over that Valle is trying to draw attention to. Someone that Sarah from LaLaLand is part of.

http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2010/10/becks-fake-populism-exposed-he-sides.html

you don’t see the sign fully inside the vehicle? you’re insane!

if Rand was your father or brother would you want some disguised lunatic shoving crap in his car, and running towards him? She was acting in a threatening manner and you are being completely utterly dishonest to say that she was *only turning the sign around so he could see it*. That is laughable!

I DID watch the clip, and I heard her lie. You are completely insane and full of BS.

I said the guy was wrong to step on her. I do not fault them at all for pulling her away.

“Apparently you’ve never gotten up off the couch to do any real political activism.” Not in like her, in a violent threatening manner, no. Nor do I have a felony arrest record, like her, either. I absolutely am against that type of in your face, aggressive, hostile behavior. There are too many crazy people, and no one should have sticks of wood shoved at their heads, through their car windows. And I don’t agree with riot type behavior or stepping on her, but if you lunge and run at candidates, wearing disguises, and thrusting crap in their car, you are going to be detained.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeVBaM2lQsg

sarainitaly said:
Not in like her, in a violent threatening manner, no. Nor do I have a felony arrest record, like her, either. I absolutely am against that type of in your face, aggressive, hostile behavior.

Apparently you’ve never gotten up off the couch to do any real political activism

How can you argue with that kind of convoluted logic? Attack a candidate is “real political activism”? More like psychosis. It’s a shame that there weren’t cops around, how would they handled the situation? It’s too bad what happened to her, but to defend her actions is lunacy. My guess if she just stood there and held her sign she wouldn’t have been tackled.

sarainitaly says:

you don’t see the sign fully inside the vehicle? you’re insane! ???

By all the tea party standards: don’t questions our people! We have the right to down play our mistakes and to spin others actions that differ from us! Just another reason to not let these power hungry hate filled, one track minded, goose step,1950′s throw back to McCarthyism get into office! Keep your hate alive and your eyes closed! Long live the tea part! Heil Paul!

sarainitaly says:
“you don’t see the sign fully inside the vehicle? you’re insane!”

Well, if you saw the sign “fully inside” the vehicle, I would not say you’re “insane,” I would argue that you’re either blind or you see everything that has a political flavor with such biased assimilation, such extremely biased assimilation, that for all practical purposes you’re blinded.

You “think” that Valle was “assaulting” Paul? Then you have no idea what she was doing…which is pretty obvious actually.

Paul’s people violently attack a harmless woman and all you can do is to defend the violence of the thugs. I always suspected that you lacked any human decency; not I’m sure that you lack basic human decency.

Sarah from LaLaLand sides with the violent thugs head stomping a woman being held down on the ground. I hope to hell people wake up the the extremism of you tea party whack jobs before next Tuesday.

Hey, Sarah in LaLaLand, see: http://www.mediaite.com/online/head-stomp-victim-lauren-valles-story-doesnt-jibe-with-newly-released-video/