Keith Olbermann’s Afghanistan Special Comment Missing Something
On last night’s Countdown, Keith Olbermann laid out a pretty stark prescription for President Obama on the war in Afghanistan: Get out now. He makes a lot of excellent points, and some less so, but Olbermann glosses over an 800 lb fact. Both he and the moderate left spent the bulk of the Bush administration using Afghanistan to play “good war, bad war” with Iraq, and elected President Obama on a promise to do exactly what he is about to do: send more troops to Afghanistan.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Whether you agree with the idea that we should leave Afghanistan now is somewhat beside the point. For years, Democrats pointed to Afghanistan as the “right fight,” in contrast to the ill-advised-and-executed Iraq war. In doing so, they ceded the issue of whether invading Afghanistan was the best way to respond to the Taliban, and built the argument that the Iraq War was depriving the US of troops that should have been in Afghanistan. It is that dissonance that Olbermann fails to address. During the campaign, Olbermann made the case for Obama by saying that he was more ready to commit additional troops than McCain was.
Now, Olbermann says Afghanistan is a quagmire that we can’t afford. True or not, what has changed in the interval? The geographical and military challenges posed by Afghanistan have been well known for a very long time.Are the stakes in Afghanistan suddenly lower? As the President reminded us during the campaign, Afghanistan (not Iraq) is “the central front in the war on terrorism,” so how can its conduct be measured in dollars and cents?
In the aftermath of 9/11, it was damn near impossible to question, let alone oppose, the invasion of Afghanistan. It’s disingenuous now, though, to send all of that support for escalation in Afghanistan down the memory hole.
4 comments
Olbermann is a screaming, lying hypocrite, just like his mirror image Hannity. When it was convenient to support the effort in Afghanistan, they did. Now, neither of these 2 princely morons finds it convenient anymore, so let the unmitigated trashing begin. Olbermann wouldn’t know the truth if it ran him over on 6th Avenue. Neither would Hannity.
What changed for Olbermann? The need to feed his audience whatever it takes to make them happy. Truth and reality be damned. Olby needs ratings. And Sean needs ratings. And Glenn needs ratings. And Rachel needs ratings. Say whatever it takes to get those numbers up. Paddy Chayevsky would be proud.
I have a “special comment” for all of the hypocritical, lying, manipulative pundocracy: “Shut up! Shut up! Shut up!”
Does this mean that Obama will be a WPITW???? If so, Obama’s ratings might go up.
You know what they say: When you’ve lost Keith Olbermann, you’ve lost Keith Olbermann.
Well T, it appears that Olberman has gone off the deep end. Fox at least has prettier prostitutes.
- » This Exists: Doggie Butt Covers
- » Joe Biden At The Radio & Television Dinner: As Entertaining As You'd Hope
- » FAMU Sex Tape Link - Real Or Hoax?
- » Bret Baier Keeps Pres. Obama On Track In Combative Fox News Exclusive Interview
- » Oh It's On! Miley Cyrus Calls Out Mika For Pole-Dance Criticism
AFP’s Tim Phillips Defends Protest Where Sick Man Was Heckled

After disturbing video emerged earlier this week from an anti-health reform rally where angry protesters screamed in the face of a sitting man who wore a sign identifying that he had Parkinson's disease (and supported the reform bill) MSNBC's Hardball brought on Tim Phillips, head of the grassroots organization Americans For Prosperity, which held the event. While Phillips condemned the actions of those individuals who berated the apparently disabled man, but said that it did not reflect most of his party's "civil" attitude during the Columbus protest.
Scott Brown On House Health Care Bill: “The Biggest Problem…Is Its Lack Of Transparency”
Last night when Chris Matthews discussed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's idea of a "Deem and Pass" to get the health reform bill pushed through Congress, his main concern was that it would open up Democrats to criticism of using evasive tactics. And he wasn't wrong: Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown was on The Situation Room tonight, already chomping at the bit to discuss the "backroom deals....political chicanery and parliamentary maneuvers" that the House majority was using to "ram this bill through."
More TV headlines:
»Betty White Charms The Pants Off Of Nation, Larry King »3
»Obama Interview Brings Big Ratings For Baier »2
»Michael Steele On CBO Report: “That’s A Lie” »12
»Lt. Dan Choi Chains Himself To White House Gate To Protest DADT, Kathy Griffin »4
»It’s Official! Christiane Amanpour To Anchor This Week »19
© 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives
| Dan Abrams, Founder
| Hosting by Datagram
|
RSS





















