Time to ditch that Ed Schultz workout video.

In his case, I don’t care if he’s an R or a D! He’s pretty!

This is embarrassing.

1. Aaron is a cutie.
2. The only two female magazines I subscribe to are Shape & Women’s Health. Both excellent reads.
3. Morning Joe has displayed its sexist commentary far too often. This was demonstrated when they spent segments discussing Palin on Time/Newsweek/wherever it was about her running.

Dang, those are some abs.

sarainitaly said:
Dang, those are some abs.

I thought he would say that he was doing the P90X program. :)

Yowza!

Come out of the closet Rep. Schock, stop your anti-gay legislating and be proud of who you are.

Edith Massey said:
Come out of the closet Rep. Schock, stop your anti-gay legislating and be proud of who you are.

Using being gay as a weapon. Classy. Why do you look down on gays and use it as a putdown?

Edith Massey said:
Come out of the closet Rep. Schock, stop your anti-gay legislating and be proud of who you are.

geez, you sure are obsessed with people being gay. sounds to me like you suffer from a bad case of homophobia.

you might want to get that looked at.

tatboy said:
Using being gay as a weapon. Classy. Why do you look down on gays and use it as a putdown?

sarainitaly said:
geez, you sure are obsessed with people being gay. sounds to me like you suffer from a bad case of homophobia.

you might want to get that looked at.

Not at all I am just tired of gay Republicans who are in the closet but pass anti gay bills vote no on same sex marriage etc. Believe it or not there are quite a few of them. Aaron Schock is at the top of the list.

tatboy said:
Using being gay as a weapon. Classy. Why do you look down on gays and use it as a putdown?

How can I look down on gay people I am gay.

Hello, sailor…

Edith Massey said:
Not at all I am just tired of gay Republicans who are in the closet but pass anti gay bills vote no on same sex marriage etc. Believe it or not there are quite a few of them. Aaron Schock is at the top of the list.

It’s interesting. That’s what they say about Republicans who are poor too. ‘How dare they vote against Democrats, it’s in their own best interest to support Dem initiatives’.

It’s as though no one can have principles (or be anything at all) that is outside the game of identity politics.

I’d suggest to you that while privacy might not be an absolute right, it’s certainly a precious consideration for civilized people.

We’d all do well to remember that.

“You know what? How dare Aaron Schock make us feel fat! We should all gang together and make a smear campaign calling him a fascist! That’s the American way!”

It seems that poor Aaron Schock is a veritable armory for liberals eager to take potshots.

Edith Massey said:
How can I look down on gay people I am gay.

So why would you use it as a weapon?

“Come out of the closet Rep. Schock, stop your anti-gay legislating and be proud of who you are.”

—Why you say that? Because he’s “fit”? Gee, by those standards Barney Frank must be the most heterosexual guy in the world.

http://libertarians4freedom.blogspot.com/

Cecelia said:
It’s interesting. That’s what they say about Republicans who are poor too. ‘How dare they vote against Democrats, it’s in their own best interest to support Dem initiatives’.

It’s as though no one can have principles (or be anything at all) that is outside the game of identity politics.

I’d suggest to you that while privacy might not be an absolute right, it’s certainly a precious consideration for civilized people.

We’d all do well to remember that.

I could care less about Aaron Shrock’s privacy, when he votes on anti gay bills and sides with the homophobes, as a public official who votes against his own interests he deserves no privacy.

It’s nice he has rippling abs but doesn’t this sort of make him a joke? This beefcake stuff is fine if you’re on the Jersey shore but you’re suppose to be a Representative, have some dignity and keep your shirt on, manbo. If Nancy Pelosi did bikini shots for a magazine she would be taken less seriously.

(and here it comes)

PoliticallyIncorrectLibertarian said:
“Come out of the closet Rep. Schock, stop your anti-gay legislating and be proud of who you are.”

—Why you say that? Because he’s “fit”? Gee, by those standards Barney Frank must be the most heterosexual guy in the world.

http://libertarians4freedom.blogspot.com/

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_UVRSmsDkeJI/TBLHgSHJuBI/AAAAAAAAAsE/4k7ktMcqDoM/s1600/Aaron+Schock+Is+Gay.PNG

Edith Massey said:
How can I look down on gay people I am gay.

There’s little more dehumanizing than the suggestion that one’s race, gender, sexuality, or ethnicity comes with its own set of uncompromising tenets.

RhapsodyinBlue said:
If Nancy Pelosi did bikini shots for a magazine she would be taken less seriously.

No . Just about the same .

Arghhhh .

Edith Massey said:
I could care less about Aaron Shrock’s privacy, when he votes on anti gay bills and sides with the homophobes, as a public official who votes against his own interests he deserves no privacy.

Then there’s little difference between you and any stereotypical corporate CEO who only cares about his own interest.

Cecelia said:
There’s little more dehumanizing than the suggestion that one’s race, gender, sexuality, or ethnicity comes with its own set of uncompromising tenets.

Who said it did? But if you are gay and you vote on anti gay bills and lie about being heterosexual, you obviously must have a problem that I am sure a good therapist could correct.. Which is fine go ahead and hate yourself but don’t legislate as a homophobe.

Cecelia said:
Then there’s little difference between you and any stereotypical corporate CEO who only cares about his own interest.

You make no sense. I care about a lot of things, the big one is not discriminating against someone based on their color, creed, religious affiliation, sex or class. Aaron Schrock doesn’t feel that way obviously and neither do his supporters.

Cecelia said:
There’s little more dehumanizing than the suggestion that one’s race, gender, sexuality, or ethnicity comes with its own set of uncompromising tenets.

Dehumanizing? Thanks for the hyperbole.

Edith Massey said:
Who said it did? But if you are gay and you vote on anti gay bills and lie about being heterosexual, you obviously must have a problem that I am sure a good therapist could correct.. Which is fine go ahead and hate yourself but don’t legislate as a homophobe.

Has he lied about being a heterosexual? Or has the guy just not said one way or another?

The inherent assumption in your argument is that there is only one for the guy to rationally think.

You can get more homophobic than that.

Cecelia said:
“You know what? How dare Aaron Schock make us feel fat! We should all gang together and make a smear campaign calling him a fascist! That’s the American way!”

It seems that poor Aaron Schock is a veritable armory for liberals eager to take potshots.

So I guess it’s okay for Aaron Shrock to wage a campaign against obesity but when the First Lady does it, it is some Muslim Communist/Socialst/Fascist/Nazi/FEMA camps plot.

Got it.

Cecelia said:
Has he lied about being a heterosexual? Or has the guy just not said one way or another?

The inherent assumption in your argument is that there is only one for the guy to rationally think.

You can get more homophobic than that.

No he has lied repeatedly about it, and trots around a fake girlfriend, Charlie Crist style.

Cecelia said:
Has he lied about being a heterosexual? Or has the guy just not said one way or another?

The inherent assumption in your argument is that there is only one for the guy to rationally think.

You can get more homophobic than that.

Feel free to call me, a gay man, homophobic if you wish. But when you do that you end up looking foolish, but somehow I am sure you are used to that.

Edith Massey said:
ehumanizing? Thanks for the hyperbole.

You wouldn’t call my characterizing such pigeon-holing as hyperbole if I were to state that all lesbians were self-loathing because they ignored the natural function of their uterus, ovaries, and breasts.

Why do you argue that a “mind” must come with a preset gamit of opinions based upon the sexuality of the owner? That it must come with it or ELSE?

Edith Massey said:
Feel free to call me, a gay man, homophobic if you wish. But when you do that you end up looking foolish, but somehow I am sure you are used to that.

Frankly, one can’t look more foolish than to advocate freedom for gays while at the same time arguing that they have no right to respect or to privacy if they hold opinions other than YOURS.

Edith Massey said:
No he has lied repeatedly about it, and trots around a fake girlfriend, Charlie Crist style.

Have you ever considered that if this is true, the man does it because he must because of people like you?

You’re the only Inquisitor demanding to know the guy’s sexuality.

Edith Massey said:
So I guess it’s okay for Aaron Shrock to wage a campaign against obesity but when the First Lady does it, it is some Muslim Communist/Socialst/Fascist/Nazi/FEMA camps plot.

Got it.

I didn’t say the First Lady was a fascist for her campaign on childhood obesity.

I didn’t use Shrock’s campaign as blog board means of essentially making the counterpoint either.

Poor Shrock, it seems he must become the GPS system for all liberal destinations….

The only thing I hate about Aaron Schrock is him telling America to lose weight. #1. Some people will never look like him no matter how much they exercise. In fact, some guys are getting abs implants, google it up, it exists. #2. How do we know if Schrock isn’t genetically blessed? Those abs look like they’ve been there a very long time, I will not admire someone that was lucky to be born pretty.

http://libertarians4freedom.blogspot.com/

Edith Massey said:
You make no sense. I care about a lot of things, the big one is not discriminating against someone based on their color, creed, religious affiliation, sex or class. Aaron Schrock doesn’t feel that way obviously and neither do his supporters.

Frankly, if you cared about not discriminating on the basis of these things, then you would have principles about privacy and respect for individual though that transcended your own politics.

You’d have a notion too that other people may feel differently from you about gay marriage or giving sexuality a minority status AND harbor the same notion that they were doing what’s best for society. You don’t have to believe that they are, but you SHOULD believe that you’re dealing with something less evil than Hitler and concentration camps when you’re dealing with people who harbor the same attitudes that American circa 1977, and the same attitudes the majority still harbors.

Good god, that is one fine looking man!

No big deal. He’s either on steroids or he’s gay. ;)

Edith Massey said:
Not at all I am just tired of gay Republicans who are in the closet but pass anti gay bills vote no on same sex marriage etc. Believe it or not there are quite a few of them. Aaron Schock is at the top of the list.

Hey Edith, why don’t you democrats focus on convincing Obama that gay marriage should be legalized, and let Republicans worry about their own. You wouldn’t vote for a pro gay marriage republican, nor a pro choice one, so why would they care what you think?

Aaron Schock ‘s district is partly in my county, so I can speak from knowledge, not crap-talk. Aaron’s a great guy and a strong Republican. It is probably going to stay that way too, as his Democratic opponent(already announced) is a guy from Peoria with two felony convictions and multiple traffic tickets. Only in Illinois…

People accusing him of homosexuality are likely confusing him with his cousin from Galesburg, a left winger who writes humorless 4-million word long letters to the local paper and compulsively insults anyone who disagrees with him.

As for “homophobe”: This slur-word is the last sign of gay desperation, like comparing a Republican–any Republican–to Adolf Hitler. “Homophobe” means “you disagree with me on homosexuality, so you’re mentally ill.”

I’ll take that bet. I AM MENTALLY ILL. I’m a hereditary bipolar; in other words, I really was ‘born that way’. And there’s more science on “psychological orientation” than there is on being ‘born gay’.

Liberal/left homosexuals, stop treading on my psychological orientation! If I want to believe that men having sex with men is wrong and the same for lesbians, I will do so, and you will put up with it. You have no choice. And insulting the way I was born is just bigoted.