I find Kagan’s decision to restrict military recruiters’ access to Harvard campus based on her opposition to DADT, a policy instituted by Bill Clinton, to have been deplorable, but I want to hear her address it .

Considering the other liberal losers BHO could have nominated, Kagan seems fairly unremarkable.

Gingrich doesn’t care. He’s all about just hating Obama and every single decision he makes. Gingrich would oppose the Obama’s nomination of himself to the Supreme Court.

Gingrich would oppose the Obama’s nomination of himself to the Supreme Court.”

I sure would and BHO said himself that he wouldn’t be able to be confirmed.

Thank God!!!

Why in the world are idiots still support the Commie? You really have to be a complete fickin moron’. His 1st term has been a to desaster. Obama has quadrupled the deficit (2009 Budget Deficit) and will double the national debt (Collective Budget Deficits). This idiot Obama has done more harm to America than Bin Laden.

Obama – Fiscally molesting the children of America

…‹(•¿•)›…‹(•¿•)›…‹(•¿•)›..Support “Legal Only” Immigration..‹(•¿•)›…‹(•¿•)›…‹(•¿•)›…

“Buycott” not Boycutt…Buycott Arizona. Visit the Great State of Arizona this year. I have planned a trip to Scottsdale for June. Scottsdale has some amazing resorts, great restaurants and shopping, a wild nightlife and some of the greatest golf courses on earth. They also have the Grand Canyon and the Colorado River. Let’s support the Great State by spending money there. Vote out politicians who don’t support legal immigration and want to boycott this state. Business owners buy Arizona products!!!!

It appears the “American Cowboy” is is a few marbles short to be speaking on political issues. He obviously doesn’t know socialism, communism, are in no way related to Obama. Obama has made certain that Capitalism is strong and healthy in the United States, including the criminal banks, oil companies, automobile manufacturers, etc. “American Cowboy” is molesting our senses with his FOX News lies.

murphy0071 says:
May 16, 2010 at 2:30 pm

It appears the “American Cowboy” is is a few marbles short to be speaking on political issues. He obviously doesn’t know socialism, communism, are in no way related to Obama. ”

Yes, another attempt by a liberal to redefine the meanings of words.

Let’s see just what some of Barry’s close friends say about Socialism and Communism.

This is from a great post by Michelle F who found these quotes:

Van J ones told the East Bay Express in 2005:
I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th [1992], and then the verdicts came down on April 29th. By August, I was a communist. (…)

I met all these young radical people of color – I mean really radical: communists and anarchists. And it was, like, ‘This is what I need to be a part of.’ I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary.

Jones was the leader and founder of a radical group, the communist revolutionary organization Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement, or STORM.

Last week, Fox News Channel’s Glenn Beck drew attention to a section of STORM’s manual that describes Jones’ organization as having a “commitment to the fundamental ideas of Marxism-Leninism.”

“We agreed with Lenin’s analysis of the state and the party,” reads the manifesto. “And we found inspiration in the revolutionary strategies developed by Third World revolutionaries like Mao Zedong and Amilcar Cabral.”

STORM’s newsletter boasted “we also saw our brand of Marxism as, in some ways, a reclamation.”

Anita Dunn –
And then the third lesson and tip actually come from two of my favorite political philosophers, Mao Tse-Tung and Mother Teresa — not often coupled with each together, but the two people that I turn to most to basically deliver a simple point, which is, you’re going to make choices. You’re going to challenge. You’re going to say, “Why not?” You’re going to figure out how to do things that have never been done before. But here’s the deal: These are your choices. They are no one else’s.

In 1947, when Mao Tse-Tung was being challenged within his own party on his plan to basically take China over, Chiang Kai-shek and the Nationalist Chinese held the cities, they had the army, they had the air force, they had everything on their side. And people said, “How can you win? How can you do this? How can you do this against all of the odds against you?” And Mao Tse-Tung said, you know, “You fight your war, and I’ll fight mine.” And think about that for a second.

You know, you don’t have to accept the definition of how to do things, and you don’t have to follow other people’s choices and paths, OK? It is about your choices and your path. You fight your own war. You lay out your own path. You figure out what’s right for you. You don’t let external definition define how good you are internally. You fight your war. You let them fight theirs. Everybody has their own path.”

Ron Bloom is the Manufacturing Czar.-
“We kind of agree with Mao that power comes largely from the barrel of a gun.”
“Any health care funding plan that is just equitable civilized and humane must, must redistribute wealth from the richer among us to the poorer and the less fortunate. Excellent health care is by definition re distributional,” Donald Berwick said.

Berwick is Obama’s nominee to run the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (sounds a little like socialism to me)

And of course , the famous quote from our Comrade -In-Chief.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoqI5PSRcXM

Newt is wasting his time. He should realize that Obama could withdraw the Kagan nominee, but his replacement choice won’t be any better. There are two types of judge: those who base their judgments on the law and those who base their judgments on their personal opinions. Obama is clearly aligned with the second group, so even without Kagan we will still get an appointee who will try to legislate from the bench.

Newt wants to get back in the game.

As far as Kagan goes….I’m cool with seeing how she responds to the Judicial Committee questions. It’s an appointment for life and there are a lot of questions that need to be asked.

Personally, I’d like to ask if she would be willing to write her own opinions rather than a group of law clerks writing for an octogenarion whose time has passed by. She’s a blank slate…that’s not necessarily a bad thing.

A justice should be bound by the rules of existing law. The Supreme Court is the Court of final appeals. A Legislature can always craft new law…it works for both sides.

What an utter fool the slimey adulterer and dead beat dad has become. The Soon-to-Be Justice Kagan was upholding university policy, and when the legality of that policy was put to question, Kagan made the appropriate change. The fact that she shows respect for law and policy, unlike Justices Alito, Scalia and Thomas merely undrescores her suoitability.

LOL… Newt Gingrich is irrelevant.

The Real Royal King says:
May 16, 2010 at 3:47 pm

…and when the legality of that policy was put to question, Kagan made the appropriate change.

Which is why the Supreme Court UNANIMOUSLY agreed with her. Oh wait. Never mind.

Newsjunky says:
May 16, 2010 at 4:08 pm

LOL… Newt Gingrich is irrelevant.

Which is why we’re talking about him… hmmm?

________

Newt is playing a little political strategy here. Yes, Kagan will most likely be confirmed, and as far as potential justices go, she’s (apparently) isn’t the most ideological person Obama could have picked. By Newt bringing up the DADT decision by Kagan, he can attack her philosophy, but more aptly, attack Obama’s. While DADT is fairly evenly split, the support for the military is still very high… and when framed as “an attack on our military in a time of war,” Newt can attack Obama’s military record.

It’s strategy. Not necessarily dishonest… but certainly opportunistic (if Newt was in Congress, he probably wouldn’t have said this).

The Soon-to-Be Justice Kagan was upholding university policy, and when the legality of that policy was put to question, Kagan made the appropriate change. ”

What a joke you are. The policy wasn’t “put to question”, she signed on to an amicus brief that went to the SCOTUS and there the court found unanimously against that brief and ruled that the Solomon Amendment was constitutional and that schools had to allow recruiters on campus.

Stop your lying liberal ass now!

And show just where Justices Alito, Scalia and Thomas have not shown respect for the law and policy.

”
felixw felixw says:
May 16, 2010 at 3:30 pm

Newt is wasting his time. He should realize that Obama could withdraw the Kagan nominee, but his replacement choice won’t be any better. There are two types of judge: those who base their judgments on the law and those who base their judgments on their personal opinions. Obama is clearly aligned with the second group, so even without Kagan we will still get an appointee who will try to legislate from the bench.”

What a load of nonsense. Of course your opinion determines how you VIEW the law. Even Scalia and Thomas have personal opinions that shape how they view and interpret the constitution. There is no intellectually neutral person on this earth. I totally agree with Supreme Court Justice Kennedy when he says an activist court is one that makes a decision you do not agree with. Liberals will call conservative judges “activist” and vice versa.

The activism of the Supreme Court is based upon what appeals they listen to and then their rendering of a judgement.

Other options exist. I “think” they can render judgements without it being adjucated….in other words, I think, they can send an appeal back to the appelate court with an opinion.

That “response” can provide a foundation for a future appelate appeal.

Or an appeal can be dismissed without any argument.

My point is…I do believe the checks and balnces work. Good sign of democracy.

Democracy is a dangerous thing!

lazzzlo says:
May 16, 2010 at 5:00 pm

Democracy is a dangerous thing!”

Thank God we don’t have a democracy; we have a republic.

murphy0071 says:
May 16, 2010 at 2:30 pm
It appears the “American Cowboy” is is a few marbles short to be speaking on political issues. He obviously doesn’t know socialism, communism, are in no way related to Obama.

It appears murphy0071 is a head in the sand, Obama zombie, who has ignored the mountain of evidence that has built up proving Obama’s allegiance to communism, from his relationship with Ayres (admitted Communist) to his own book were he talks about his admiration for his Marxist professors to his childhood mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, who was a member of the communist to Obama’s Karl Marx “Spread the wealth” philosophy.

If you keep igoning the facts like Obama quadrupling the deficit (2009 Budget Deficit) and will double the national debt (Collective Budget Deficits) and just allow him to fiscally molest the children of America.

THEN YOU ARE AS QUILTY AS OBAMA IS!!!!!! YOU CAN GO TO HELL!!!!!!!!!!!

It is one thing to be fooled into voting for the scum bag, but it is something else to continue to support this moron. Even my most liberal friends have denounced him, but they are educated people; doctors, lawyers etc. I think the only folks left supporting the Commie are those who cash a welfare check.

Sad commentary on the Left that they don’t even understand the difference between judgments based on the Constitution and judgments based on personal opinion. But that is part of the lack of symmetry between Right and Left. If the Right controlled the court, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights would rule the day. If the Left controlled the court, their personal opinions would be substituted for the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. And the Left is so corrupted that they don’t even recognize the difference any more.

Obama word is “empathy”. Obama wants Judges with “empathy”

Empathy does not belong in the Supiem Court

It is a judge’s “empathy” the judges use as an excuse for murder. They have ruled in favor of the slut who gets knocked over the innocent baby

Empathy favors the whore over the baby

The devil smiles every time a baby is murdered by abortion because he gets two more souls, the mothers and the doctors.

AmericanCowpoke – you are indeed a credit to tea-baggers everywhere!

Hello,everybody,the good shoping place,the new season approaching, click in. Let’s facelift bar!
===== http://www.fashionclothe.com ====

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33

UGG BOOT $50

Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $33

Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $33

Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16

Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30

Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $12

New era cap $9

Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $18

FREE SHIPPING

Ted says:
May 16, 2010 at 9:06 pm
AmericanCowpoke – you are indeed a credit to tea-baggers everywhere!
________________________________________________________

So if we are the Teabaggers I guess that makes you the Tea Bagees

I bet you had a mouth full of man balls as you typed the crap you spew

and when framed as “an attack on our military in a time of war,” Newt can attack Obama’s military record.

—

Given credibility, no doubt, by Newt’s own sterling record of service.

The Real Royal King says:
May 16, 2010 at 11:35 pm

Given credibility, no doubt, by Newt’s own sterling record of service.

Oh, that’s right… I forgot. To talk about war, the military, or international actions… you need to have served yourself!

Silly me! It’s a good thing Obama has all that experience! I mean, he’s the Commander in Chief… just think how embarrassing it would be to complain that Gingrich doesn’t have the right or credibility to give his opinion because he never served… all the while knowing Obama never served either! You’d have to be pretty hypocritical to go with that line of “logic,” and expect nobody to see right through it.

Oh… wait…

Sorry, INB, but one of your own ilk raised the issue with regard to service. I decry not the lack thereof as a prerequsite to speaking, but the ribald hypocrisy of those who support every war which comes along, with or without, merit, and who proclaim their tremendous support for the troops. You know the hypocrites of whom I speak, the panty-waisted draft-dodging W, Cheney, Gingrich, Kristol & al. As usual, you purposely miss perfectly valid points. Intentionally. Sorry you have so many gutless creeps on your side, but you chose it.

You know the hypocrites, of which I speak, to life panty draft-dodging W, Cheney, Gingrich, and Kristol. As usual, you are fully qualified to intentionally lose. Intentionally. Unfortunately, you have so many lovely stealthily on your side, but he has chosen.
micro sd

jackypond says:
May 17, 2010 at 6:53 am

You know the hypocrites, of which I speak, to life panty draft-dodging W, Cheney, Gingrich, and Kristol. ”

Oh, but dbag, you left out Joe Biden!

Tsk,tsk!

When reading anything written by trrk I’m reminded of that guy we all avoid at work and social gatherings. You know the one I’m talking about. He has a twitch over his eye, has trouble looking people in the eye, can never clearly and concisely state his point, is always “dripping” slimy inuendo, and you don’t want to shake his hand because its always moist with sweat. You know that guy, right. I have a friend who taught psychology in Austin, Texas. He says that Austin has its share of those types. trrk says he is from Austin, I believe.

No, Snacker, I left out the obese, shrieking pantywaist Limbaugh. Biden was a 1-Y and couldn’t be drafted absent a declared national emergenc. There was none. Limbaugh had a boil on his bum.

Tell me, trrk, were you the boil you referred to on Rush’s butt?

The Real Royal King says:
May 17, 2010 at 6:27 am

Sorry, INB, but one of your own ilk raised the issue with regard to service.

As far as I can see… nobody here. What you misinterpreted was this statement from me:

While DADT is fairly evenly split, the support for the military is still very high… and when framed as “an attack on our military in a time of war,” Newt can attack Obama’s military record.

As in, Newt can attack Obama’s military positions (support, etc.)… not his service.

You did not interpret the statement correctly. You simply saw, “military service,” and argued something off topic.

I decry not the lack thereof as a prerequsite [sic] to speaking, but the ribald hypocrisy of those who support every war which comes along, with or without, merit, and who proclaim their tremendous support for the troops.

So you believe that if you support a war effort… you should have served? Wow.

You know the hypocrites of whom I speak, the panty-waisted [sic] draft-dodging W, Cheney, Gingrich, Kristol & al.

Right… you don’t like those on the right who support war efforts because they didn’t serve. To you, unless you’ve served, you shouldn’t be able to support, speak, or debate the merits of a military action. That is… unless you’re a Democrat, in which case you can speak about not going to war, or (rarely) going to war effectively… service is not required.

How exactly is that any different than what I said you said before?

As usual, you purposely miss perfectly valid points. Intentionally. Sorry you have so many gutless creeps on your side, but you chose it.

Tell me this… is Obama “gutless” because he didn’t serve? He sent a bunch more troops to Afghanistan… but never put on a uniform himself. Is he gutless too?

It’s statements like that which show you’re a worthless political hack, willing to cross the bounds of decency and hypocrisy to achieve a political victory. Once again, you must be proud.

The Real Royal King says:
May 17, 2010 at 9:38 am

I’m pretty sure the military accepts members even if there’s not a current conflict (or high-profile war effort). And how old was Obama during Gulf War I… I’m sure they would have been happy to have his help. What’s his excuse?

newt WHO????????????? OOOHH….. MR “ETHICS” HIMSELF.

Speaking of long-term REPUGTER intellectuals! Monomanic Newt. A trypical REPug minimalist.

Geesussah! From what psychic black hole did this hate-dribbling, transmogrified CowClod arise?? A blue-collar Repug dream come true!! With his “educated, professional” friends. Eating out of the back of a pickup truck. At the local Klavern. Yippie Yi Ya Cayo!