When it rains it pours whenever something goes wrong in this country. Apparently this wasn’t even someone asleep at the controls, but it still made no difference.

Little do people realize this happens all the time.

I eagerly await what people have to say about this.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
I eagerly await what people have to say about this.

Yikes! Good thing everyone is alright. Even as political opposites (not “enemies” as some have said) should not want to see harm befoul their opponents.

How’s that “Reasonable?”

ImNotBlue said:
Yikes! Good thing everyone is alright. Even as political opposites (not “enemies” as some have said) should not want to see harm befoul their opponents.

How’s that “Reasonable?”

More bullshit from the Mediiate spin artist if you ask me.
“You’re seething with rage [ImNotBlue]”
-MicheleF

Barack Must Go said:
When it rains it pours whenever something goes wrong in this country. Apparently this wasn’t even someone asleep at the controls, but it still made no difference.

What?!

ImNotBlue said:
Yikes! Good thing everyone is alright. Even as political opposites (not “enemies” as some have said) should not want to see harm befoul their opponents. How’s that “Reasonable?”

for him it appears disappointing

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
More bullshit from the Mediiate spin artist if you ask me.“You’re seething with rage [ImNotBlue]”-MicheleF

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
More bullshit from the Mediiate spin artist if you ask me.“You’re seething with rage [ImNotBlue]”-MicheleF

Hehehe.

Aw, poor fella. Wants something nasty, so he can hypocritically whine and complain… and when it doesn’t happen, and his “enemy” doesn’t show the same nastiness… well, he gets upset anyway.

Once again, it’s not “reality” you’re looking for… it’s just your version of events.

ImNotBlue said:
Yikes! Good thing everyone is alright. Even as political opposites (not “enemies” as some have said) should not want to see harm befoul their opponents.

How’s that “Reasonable?”

I also hope you will criticize mcCain and Thrasher for calling democrats their enemies as well as all of the nazi/socialist/anti-christ/un-american accusations as well.

ImNotBlue said:
Hehehe.

Aw, poor fella. Wants something nasty, so he can hypocritically whine and complain… and when it doesn’t happen, and his “enemy” doesn’t show the same nastiness… well, he gets upset anyway.

Once again, it’s not “reality” you’re looking for… it’s just your version of events.

Spin as much as you like, it won’t change reality. Remember; facts have a liberal bias. I don’t want it, I just anticipate it. Unlike you i’m not hypocrite. I don’t try to pump the “enemy” bullshit while forgetting that John McCain and John Thrasher made the EXACT SAME comments about democrats. Nice try there. spinster. Aren’t you the same person who reads things that aren’t in plain black and white contrary to what is in front of their face. And then when i called you on it didn’t you say something along the lines of “I tire of this”. You’re the biggest bullshit artist here quite frankly. Still waiting on a plausible explanation of the difference between middle eastern dictators which conservatives support and latin american ones which they want out.

cjd ohio 1 said:
for him it appears disappointing

Not disappointing. I just don’t like this person’s continual bullshitting. He’s notorious for it.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
Not disappointing. I just don’t like this person’s continual bullshitting. He’s notorious for it.

*continuous

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
I also hope you will criticize mcCain and Thrasher for calling democrats their enemies as well as all of the nazi/socialist/anti-christ/un-american accusations as well.

I will criticize ANYONE who calls their political opponents “enemies,” as well as “Nazi/Anti-Christ/Un-American.” “Socialist,” I won’t, because -while it’s used negatively- it isn’t actually a slur or negative comment (some people are proud to be Socialists, and aren’t bad people for it).

Of course, Reasonable, you wouldn’t expect any of that… mostly because it’s not how YOU operate, and like so many others, to justify your own poor behavior (and those you support), you have to be able to say, “They do it too!” or “They did it first!”

But if you ask me, that doesn’t quite matter. Bad behavior deserves to be called out on both sides, and unlike some others, I have no qualms doing so… no matter what “your version” tells you is/will be true.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
The_Reasonable_Lib says:
April 19, 2011 at 5:40 pm The_Reasonable_Lib(Quote)

Hey, son, why not make this into a “racial” thing like you always do?

What? The air-traffic controller was white and he did it on purpose?

Come on son, spin it!

Republicans want to cut air traffic controller funding.

ellie said:
Republicans want to cut air traffic controller funding.

YEP YEP

ellie said:
Republicans want to cut air traffic controller funding.

Sorry, dear, they merely don’t want to buy them mattresses.

ImNotBlue said:
I will criticize ANYONE who calls their political opponents “enemies,” as well as “Nazi/Anti-Christ/Un-American.” “Socialist,” I won’t, because -while it’s used negatively- it isn’t actually a slur or negative comment (some people are proud to be Socialists, and aren’t bad people for it).

Of course, Reasonable, you wouldn’t expect any of that… mostly because it’s not how YOU operate, and like so many others, to justify your own poor behavior (and those you support), you have to be able to say, “They do it too!” or “They did it first!”

But if you ask me, that doesn’t quite matter. Bad behavior deserves to be called out on both sides, and unlike some others, I have no qualms doing so… no matter what “your version” tells you is/will be true.

You have yet to do ANY of that, people do it on here everyday and you do nothing of the sort. It passes you by and by your standards that means you’re condoning it, right? You have no idea how I operate. What you’re saying completely contradicts what I am on record of saying on these very boards about 2 wrongs not making a right. However, you may want to debate that fact with many of your own comrades who attempted to compare the e-mail of our President being presented as a member of family of monkeys to those with Bush and those who justify the nazi references. You’re lying again. You SAY that you have no qualms, but your actions say otherwise. During the Arizona shooting, i was particularly critical of those on the left and right who were making political leverage out of the situation. My point is that if you’re going to complain about something complain about it no matter who does it, not just your opponents, which you have not done. You are using one incident by a liberal to further your agenda. If you’re going to say something about me, at least back it up and make it something that I don’t know is blatantly false. Perhaps you’re projecting right now?

military or civilian controllers i wonder? glad everything turned out ok

ellie said:
Republicans want to cut air traffic controller funding.

money solves everything

cjd ohio 1 said:
money solves everything

well cutting doesn’t exactly improve performance

God, why do the libs wish Michelle’s plane had crashed.

That’s just sick.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
well cutting doesn’t exactly improve performance

either does throwing money at it ……..ie schools

That air traffic controller must be a racist…right all you libtards?

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
well cutting doesn’t exactly improve performance

if its wasted on silly sh*it it does, not talking about pay…………..but bullsh*t

cjd ohio 1 said:
either does throwing money at it ……..ie schools

The school problem stems from our culture as I’ve said before. There are other countries with higher graduation rates and lower spending per capita on education. However, that’s not cause to cut it because that reduces our number of college graduates & ultimately our competitiveness on the global stage. That’s part of the reason why we have such an unskilled labor force, culture i mean.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
The school problem stems from our culture as I’ve said before. There are other countries with higher graduation rates and lower spending per capita on education. However, that’s not cause to cut it because that reduces our number of college graduates & ultimately our competitiveness on the global stage. That’s part of the reason why we have such an unskilled labor force, culture i mean.

and how much money do you think is wasted?

Ellen Carey Rowe said:
Republicans want to cut air traffic controller funding.

If something bad or unfortunate happens (or thankfully doesn’t happen), who’s to blame? Well, it’s the Republicans of course!

Rule #1 for Left-Wing Ideologues: No matter the situation, Republicans are always to blame for anything negative.

This rule can be reversed for right-wing ideologues, and remains equally foolish and untrue.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
Spin as much as you like, it won’t change reality. Remember; facts have a liberal bias. I don’t want it, I just anticipate it.

And when it doesn’t happen, you get equally upset… as was demonstrated.

Unlike you i’m not hypocrite.

Do you honestly believe that? Do you really think anyone else does?

I don’t try to pump the “enemy” bullshit while forgetting that John McCain and John Thrasher made the EXACT SAME comments about democrats. Nice try there. spinster.

Except you then assumed what my commentary towards that would be… which was wrong.

Now what me not assume that you’d condemn McCain and anyone else, AS WELL AS Democrats (like Obama) for such language. Right? I’d like to see that in writing, please.

Aren’t you the same person who reads things that aren’t in plain black and white contrary to what is in front of their face. And then when i called you on it didn’t you say something along the lines of “I tire of this”.

Um, no. Please provide a link. Perhaps you’re thinking of someone else.

You’re the biggest bullshit artist here quite frankly. Still waiting on a plausible explanation of the difference between middle eastern dictators which conservatives support and latin american ones which they want out.

Huh? What context was that conversation? And for that matter (not to non-answer your question… but here goes), what is the difference among the same thing but for Democrats? What are you driving at, “Reasonable?”

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
You have yet to do ANY of that, people do it on here everyday and you do nothing of the sort. It passes you by and by your standards that means you’re condoning it, right?

I’m sorry, I didn’t realize I was a member of the Media Police Force, and here to comment and rule over everyone. I occasionally call out people on the left, and have occasionally called out folks on the right. You don’t have to believe it (because it doesn’t fit your reality… which we’ve already discussed), but it’s true.

You have no idea how I operate.

No? You’ve been around long enough that I’ve got a pretty firm grasp on your style.

What you’re saying completely contradicts what I am on record of saying on these very boards about 2 wrongs not making a right.

Does it?

However, you may want to debate that fact with many of your own comrades who attempted to compare the e-mail of our President being presented as a member of family of monkeys to those with Bush and those who justify the nazi references.

I didn’t participate in that thread. Honestly, it didn’t interest me because I knew the foolishness that would come out of the headline. My take on it was/is that some dope did something (either racist, or just really stupid) and should be fired for it. Their intentions don’t matter to me, only their decision making abilities… which clearly, aren’t good enough to be entrusted with any type of political position.

And for that, I would say the same of those who made Nazi references about Bush. Would you?

You’re lying again. You SAY that you have no qualms, but your actions say otherwise.

Like?

During the Arizona shooting, i was particularly critical of those on the left and right who were making political leverage out of the situation.

As well you should have been.

My point is that if you’re going to complain about something complain about it no matter who does it, not just your opponents, which you have not done.

Completely untrue.

You are using one incident by a liberal to further your agenda.

And what “incident” would that be? All I said was that I was glad Mrs. Obama and the rest of the crews (both planes) were safe. I also pointed that YOU were the one who was predicting nastiness and stupidity… and then got mad when it didn’t happen. How is that my fault, again?

If you’re going to say something about me, at least back it up and make it something that I don’t know is blatantly false. Perhaps you’re projecting right now?

I’d point out the irony and hypocrisy in this statement… but of course, you already said you’re “not a hypocrite,” so I doubt you’d listen. It’s not part of your “reality.”

I’m glad no one was hurt.

ImNotBlue said:
If something bad or unfortunate happens (or thankfully doesn’t happen), who’s to blame? Well, it’s the Republicans of course!

Rule #1 for Left-Wing Ideologues: No matter the situation, Republicans are always to blame for anything negative.

This rule can be reversed for right-wing ideologues, and remains equally foolish and untrue.

Quite a rant. Do the Republicans want to cut funding for ATC or not?

Ellen Carey Rowe said:
Quite a rant. Do the Republicans want to cut funding for ATC or not?

Would more funding (or current levels of funding) have prevented this?

Does “more money,” always mean “better services?”

Bottom line, and to answer your question, unless you can show that the funds would have stopped something like this from happening, the two situations aren’t exactly relevant or related to each other. If I get into a car accident in my Nissan, it doesn’t necessarily mean that had I spent more money and bought a BMW, I would have avoided the accident… now does it?

Get it?

ImNotBlue said:
unless you can show that the funds would have stopped something like this from happening, the two situations aren’t exactly relevant or related to each other.

Except that there’s been so many ATC incidents recently. Looks like Trump has got some splainin’ to do. What do you think?

GHOSTS OF VIETNAM CALLING DONALD TRUMP: SHOW US YOUR DRAFT CARD!
http://tinyurl.com/3qomhvn

Within a couple days there will be an article about someone mistakenly serving her children alcohol.

ellie said:
Except that there’s been so many ATC incidents recently.

And more money would fix it? What makes you believe that?

ImNotBlue said:
And more money would fix it? What makes you believe that?

Exactly. If the Air Traffic Controllers are doing a shitty job, YOU DON’T REWARD THEM FOR IT.

ImNotBlue says:
And more money would fix it? What makes you believe that?
……………………………………..
By all means cut the funding, that’s always the answer! True, money doesn’t fix everything, but anger and knee gerk reactions, never helps!

ImNotBlue said:
And more money would fix it? What makes you believe that?

And less money would? What makes you think THAT?

Kitsune said:
Exactly. If the Air Traffic Controllers are doing a shitty job, YOU DON’T REWARD THEM FOR IT.

Jeebus you guys are dense. Do you think more money only means pay them more and reward them??? How about this idea. Maybe they could hire and train more controllers so they aren’t so exhausted that they screw up on the job. Do you disagree with American pilot and hero “Sully” Sullenberger? http://tinyurl.com/3b8a6zq

timcajun said:
ImNotBlue says:And more money would fix it? What makes you believe that?……………………………………..By all means cut the funding, that’s always the answer! True, money doesn’t fix everything, but anger and knee gerk reactions, never helps!

What “anger and knee gerk [sic] reactions” are you talking about?

ellie said:
And less money would? What makes you think THAT?

I have no opinion on whether they need more or less funding. However, I do know that blindly saying that “cutting funds is a bad idea because they make mistakes,” or that “raising funds will fix things,” is foolish.

Ok now that everyones alive And well. Is it absolutely necessary for Michelle to take Air Force 2 simply for a trip to the mall?

ImNotBlue said:
I have no opinion on whether they need more or less funding. However, I do know that blindly saying that “cutting funds is a bad idea because they make mistakes,” or that “raising funds will fix things,” is foolish.

And I don’t recall anyone saying that. But I do agree with “Sully” Sullenberger. http://tinyurl.com/3b8a6zq Do you?

ImNotBlue said:
And when it doesn’t happen, you get equally upset… as was demonstrated.

Do you honestly believe that? Do you really think anyone else does?

Except you then assumed what my commentary towards that would be… which was wrong.

Now what me not assume that you’d condemn McCain and anyone else, AS WELL AS Democrats (like Obama) for such language. Right? I’d like to see that in writing, please.

Um, no. Please provide a link. Perhaps you’re thinking of someone else.

Huh? What context was that conversation? And for that matter (not to non-answer your question… but here goes), what is the difference among the same thing but for Democrats? What are you driving at, “Reasonable?”

I’m sorry, I didn’t realize I was a member of the Media Police Force, and here to comment and rule over everyone. I occasionally call out people on the left, and have occasionally called out folks on the right. You don’t have to believe it (because it doesn’t fit your reality… which we’ve already discussed), but it’s true.

No? You’ve been around long enough that I’ve got a pretty firm grasp on your style.

Does it?

I didn’t participate in that thread. Honestly, it didn’t interest me because I knew the foolishness that would come out of the headline. My take on it was/is that some dope did something (either racist, or just really stupid) and should be fired for it. Their intentions don’t matter to me, only their decision making abilities… which clearly, aren’t good enough to be entrusted with any type of political position.

And for that, I would say the same of those who made Nazi references about Bush. Would you?

Like?

As well you should have been.

Completely untrue.

And what “incident” would that be? All I said was that I was glad Mrs. Obama and the rest of the crews (both planes) were safe. I also pointed that YOU were the one who was predicting nastiness and stupidity… and then got mad when it didn’t happen. How is that my fault, again?

I’d point out the irony and hypocrisy in this statement… but of course, you already said you’re “not a hypocrite,” so I doubt you’d listen. It’s not part of your “reality.”

Wrong, I was “upset” at your predictable bullshitting and attempts to bash me. You’re just like the rest. You don’t come to debate, only to bash those who don’t agree with you. Then when proven wrong and backed into a corner you attempt to spin your way out of it like now, but I refuse to let you this time.

I’m not. It’s not about belief, it’s about fact. Can you prove that I am?

Did I call you out? No, i mentioned nobody by name, the wording was ambiguous. I simply said I await the response. Evidently you don’t think very highly of your fellow conservatives if you think that they would say something vile which I would anticipate.

The same could be said for you, Spin master. I know that you, like Pablo & Liberal Tormentor have tendency to zoom in on anything that you THINK you can attck and attempt to bullshit your way out when you get caught, but as I’ve already said; I won’t let you do that this time.

Yes, it does. If you’re insinuating it does I suggest that you support that.

Honestly? No. But that is my “style” as you put it. I don’t believe in stepping down to the lowest common denominator save extreme situations. Nazi references are pointless debates because arguing with those who make them is futile. I don’t believe that silence denotes acceptance or agreement which is something which I have also explained to Liberal tormentor before. However, you obviously do, and I have been judging you according to your own standards which you do not live up to. Like? The fact that you haven’t condemned any vile conservatives on here. you’re just like politicians who use the extremists to their advantage.

It’s not untrue. Please link to one post of you condemning a conservative.

I was referring to the “enemies” comment and you know that. I did predict that. I wasn’t “upset” that it didn’t happen as you continue to insist despite me already going over this. I was “upset” that you inject your typical attack, bullshit, spin, deflect maneuvers into the matter.

Yes, please do so. How is it hypocritical and ironic. please try not to spin this time. Read EXACTLY WHAT IS THERE. Not your own meaning.

“Plane Carrying First Lady Obama Forced To Abort Landing…”

What’s she bitch’n about?…aborted landings or aborted babies…it’s all the same to her.

Yep, real classy.

Why the hell does Queen Michelle need to be flying from Washington to New York on her own private 737 just for a propaganda appearance on The View? Did she take along 150 people with her? Talk about a giant waste of taxpayer dollars!

Maybe OBrainless ‘ll finally put his foot up these union goon’s backsides now.

ellie said:
Republicans want to cut air traffic controller funding.

Might as well, appears all they’re doing is sleeping and watching movies.

OxyCon said:
Why the hell does Queen Michelle need to be flying from Washington to New York on her own private 737 just for a propaganda appearance on The View? Did she take along 150 people with her? Talk about a giant waste of taxpayer dollars!

Just imagine what the lunch bill was.

ellie said:
And I don’t recall anyone saying that. But I do agree with “Sully” Sullenberger. http://tinyurl.com/3b8a6zq Do you?

Is it really so impossible for you to stay on topic? This is twice thus far that you’ve sought to co-opt a thread with what YOU want to talk about, instead of what the thread is about.

I don’t know if they need more money or not, and I’m not going to take the word of one guy (no matter how good a pilot he is) for anything. I know you’ll agree with him, because Think Progress and MSNBC told you to… but it’s going to take a little more than that to sell me. I don’t know, and that’s it.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
Wrong, I was “upset” at your predictable bullshitting and attempts to bash me.

To “bash” you? I pointed out that your prediction was wrong. That’s “bashing?” Wow… you’re very sensitive. I’ll have to remember that.

You’re just like the rest. You don’t come to debate, only to bash those who don’t agree with you.

If you believe that, you’re either not paying attention, or you’ve got me confused with someone else.

Or (a third option), even more sensitive than I previously thought.

Then when proven wrong and backed into a corner you attempt to spin your way out of it like now, but I refuse to let you this time.

What am I spinning? There’s nothing to be spun!

I’m not. It’s not about belief, it’s about fact. Can you prove that I am?

Honestly, I’m having trouble following you. Your answering a question or statement I made, but I’m not sure which one. So I can’t easily answer this one.

Did I call you out? No, i mentioned nobody by name, the wording was ambiguous. I simply said I await the response. Evidently you don’t think very highly of your fellow conservatives if you think that they would say something vile which I would anticipate.

So… I don’t think much of my fellow conservatives, because I pointed out that you expect them to say something rude? Or are you suggesting that your comment didn’t mean you were looking for what conservatives were going to say, only that you were particularly interested in everyone else’s comments?

Really? Is this some sort of Keith Olbermann defense? Some kind of, “That’s not what I meant, even though it’s clearly what I meant?” defense?

If I got it wrong, please do tell… what was the point of your first comment?

The same could be said for you, Spin master. I know that you, like Pablo & Liberal Tormentor have tendency to zoom in on anything that you THINK you can attck and attempt to bullshit your way out when you get caught, but as I’ve already said; I won’t let you do that this time.

I’m afraid I might have to call you a waaaa-mublance. You seem awfully worked up over getting called out, and being wrong.

Yes, it does. If you’re insinuating it does I suggest that you support that.

Huh?

Honestly? No. But that is my “style” as you put it.

Again, hard to follow… but if I’ve got it correct, you’re saying that your “style” is to attack people on the right, while defending or ignoring people on the left.

That’s not a “style” my friend… that’s just bias.

I don’t believe in stepping down to the lowest common denominator save extreme situations. Nazi references are pointless debates because arguing with those who make them is futile. I don’t believe that silence denotes acceptance or agreement which is something which I have also explained to Liberal tormentor before. However, you obviously do, and I have been judging you according to your own standards which you do not live up to. Like? The fact that you haven’t condemned any vile conservatives on here. you’re just like politicians who use the extremists to their advantage.

Oh, if only that were true, you’d have a leg to stand on. I’ve had it out with a number of the conservatives on here. Similarly, there are a number of people whom I just simply ignore. Find me in a conversation with “Garth” or “Gordon.” They’re not there. There are some people who are just so far out there, that I’m not interested in dealing with… but unlike you, they’re on both sides of the spectrum.

It’s not untrue. Please link to one post of you condemning a conservative.

I’ll do one better for you, I’ll condemn the party as a whole right now:

As a party, Republicans and Conservatives are on the wrong side of the gay marriage debate. For them to create reasons why the government should be interested in “protecting the family” by preventing gay marriage is foolish. Supporters (like Bill O’Reilly) are wrong when they suggest that the prevent gay marriage is in the interest of the children, or needed to help strengthen traditional marriage. Until the party changes its way on that issue, I refuse to call (or register myself) as a Republican.

How does that work for you? Now you try!

I was referring to the “enemies” comment and you know that. I did predict that. I wasn’t “upset” that it didn’t happen as you continue to insist despite me already going over this. I was “upset” that you inject your typical attack, bullshit, spin, deflect maneuvers into the matter.

Spin move! Deflect. Deflect. Special Attack! Falcon PUNCH!

But seriously, what are you talking about?

Yes, please do so. How is it hypocritical and ironic. please try not to spin this time. Read EXACTLY WHAT IS THERE. Not your own meaning.

Your original quote: “If you’re going to say something about me, at least back it up and make it something that I don’t know is blatantly false. Perhaps you’re projecting right now?”

The hypocrisy and the irony comes from the fact that what you’re doing to me, is exactly what you’re complaining I do. You have provided nothing to “back up” your comments about me, and you’ve made stuff up that I “know is blatantly false.” Do you see it now?

timzank said:
Might as well, appears all they’re doing is sleeping and watching movies.

LOL, you do have a point there.

There needs to be something done about this. I’m not necessarily for cutting funding unless there is an excess that really isn’t needed. Although instead of cutting funding perhaps the money could be spent on 5 Hour Energy Drink-infused coffee. Oh, and somebody could take the damn television out of there.

Good to know everyone is safe though.

stoogedudes said:
LOL, you do have a point there. There needs to be something done about this. I’m not necessarily for cutting funding unless there is an excess that really isn’t needed. Although instead of cutting funding perhaps the money could be spent on 5 Hour Energy Drink-infused coffee. Oh, and somebody could take the damn television out of there. Good to know everyone is safe though.

different shift work, i dont like their hours, 8 on ,8 off nah

Not to be totally offensive to Mediaite, but that is a horrible photo of the First Lady.

WCinWI said:
Not to be totally offensive to Mediaite, but that is a horrible photo of the First Lady.

It must be a “pre-botox” photo they used. They did make her up nice for her View propaganda appearence tho. It was the best and classiest look I’ve seen from her.

WCinWI said:
Not to be totally offensive to Mediaite, but that is a horrible photo of the First Lady.

she looks fine

WCinWI said:
Not to be totally offensive to Mediaite, but that is a horrible photo of the First Lady.

bad light glare ,but other than that

cjd ohio 1 said:
bad light glare ,but other than that

As a female and with the recent “racist monkey” post, I thought it just looked like an enlarged monkey photo. I am not trying to make this a racist point, but the grin just looked a lot like that email that was recently discussed. Perhaps it’s just the enlarged smile, but there are far better ones. That’s all I meant.

ImNotBlue said:
http://tinyurl.com/3b8a6zq Do you?
Is it really so impossible for you to stay on topic? This is twice thus far that you’ve sought to co-opt a thread with what YOU want to talk about, instead of what the thread is about.

Are you really this stupid? Yes, at this point I’m convinced you are. I AM ON TOPIC, DUNCE.
I’m done with you. Hopeless.

WCinWI said:
Not to be totally offensive to Mediaite, but that is a horrible photo of the First Lady.

What’s wrong with it?

WCinWI said:
As a female and with the recent “racist monkey” post, I thought it just looked like an enlarged monkey photo.

No surprise here I guess. Don’t bother to answer my other post.

WCinWI said:
As a female and with the recent “racist monkey” post, I thought it just looked like an enlarged monkey photo. I am not trying to make this a racist point, but the grin just looked a lot like that email that was recently discussed. Perhaps it’s just the enlarged smile, but there are far better ones. That’s all I meant.

well i am about the same age as the first lady, a pretty lady, and i think a fine picture……..WCinWI woman are their own worse critics lol

Dem4Ever says:
What’s she bitch’n about?…aborted landings or aborted babies…it’s all the same to her.
…………………………………………
I’ve got some puppies if you want to torture them?

ellie said:
Are you really this stupid? Yes, at this point I’m convinced you are. I AM ON TOPIC, DUNCE.I’m done with you. Hopeless.

You only think you’re on topic, because you don’t read the threads… as you admitted in the other one.

You’re basically just a copy/paste bot for whatever left-wing source your reading at the moment. You’ll tangentially connect topics, despite their non-relation, and try to refocus everyone onto what YOU want to talk about. Again, build your own site… stop trying to take over this one.

ImNotBlue said:
You only think you’re on topic, because you don’t read the threads… as you admitted in the other one

No I didn’t. That is your extremely thick-skulled interpretation of what I said. And I’m not taking any more of my time to try and slog through it with you. bah bye

ImNotBlue said:
You’re basically just a copy/paste bot for whatever left-wing source your reading at the moment. You’ll tangentially connect topics, despite their non-relation, and try to refocus everyone onto what YOU want to talk about. Again, build your own site… stop trying to take over this one.

Poor put upon whiny one. Get a life. No one made you hall monitor.

What, they came in heavy?

ellie said:
And I’m not taking any more of my time to try and slog through it with you.

Just do what you do best, Ellen.

Pablo said:
Just do what you do best, Ellen.

Nice , Pablo !

Poor misunderstood Ellie! The Republicans want to cut the # of air traffic controllers (where the hell she got this from only God and Ellie know).

I completely understand her logic – don’t fire the jerk who’s not doing his/her job – hire another jerk to watch the jerk not doing his/her job! It would lower the unemployed numbers and imagine, you’d have to build bigger spaces for them (maybe put in a small cot or 2) – more job creation!
Look at all the additional people who would get jobs – think people, just think! It’s time to forget that nonsense about being the best that you can be – time to be mediocre and become a job creator.

Pablo said:
Just do what you do best, Ellen.

No ……..I didn’t …….No………….All lies HA ! Bravo Pablo !

seek said:
Poor misunderstood Ellie! The Republicans want to cut the # of air traffic controllers (where the hell she got this from only God and Ellie know).

I completely understand her logic – don’t fire the jerk who’s not doing his/her job – hire another jerk to watch the jerk not doing his/her job! It would lower the unemployed numbers and imagine, you’d have to build bigger spaces for them (maybe put in a small cot or 2) – more job creation!
Look at all the additional people who would get jobs – think people, just think! It’s time to forget that nonsense about being the best that you can be – time to be mediocre and become a job creator.

I think you ought to tell this to “Sully” Sullenberger. http://tinyurl.com/3b8a6zq

WCinWI said:
As a female and with the recent “racist monkey” post, I thought it just looked like an enlarged monkey photo. I am not trying to make this a racist point, but the grin just looked a lot like that email that was recently discussed. Perhaps it’s just the enlarged smile, but there are far better ones. That’s all I meant.

WCinWI said:
I am not trying to make this a racist point

FAIL. This is probably the worst racist post I’ve read on this blog and I have been reading here for over a year. I wouldn’t even wipe my butt with your big old masters certificate. You’re disgusting.

Glad all turned out well. That would have been a disaster….

Perhaps this will help fix the ATC problem!

cjd ohio 1 said:
military or civilian controllers i wonder? glad everything turned out ok

.
According to the WP it was military:

“A White House plane carrying Michelle Obama came dangerously close to a 200-ton military cargo jet and had to abort its landing at Andrews Air Force Base on Monday as the result of an air traffic controller’s mistake, according to federal officials familiar with the incident.”

Of course that doesn’t slow the Libs down in blaming Repubs while screaming for more spending, does it.

So Planned Parenthood did NOT have anything
to do with this Aborted Landing?

Elle I accidentally clicked on your “link” and thank you very much I had freaking nightmares!

Your hero is Ed Schultzzzzzzz? The guy who has more malice in his heart and spits when he talks? Oh yes, sorry, you’ve never heard him spew “hate” – never!!! Oh and how is his “I want to kick Fox’s assssss” working for him?

You lie, you don’t listen and basically girlfriend it’s time for a retread.

Next time, warn us.

Yes. Having the day off is nice.

Love the fools who are giving the controllers excuses. You realize of course that they “fought” for their hours – they negotiated, they screamed, they yelled and now it’s everyone else’s fault that they work such horrible hours (so they have lots of time off).

This is a union at its best. Basically, they are now saying “it’s your fault you allowed us to be stupid; you were the adults and you didn’t stop us).

BTW Bright wonders, what happened to Michelle’s flight happens more times than any of us want to know – someone just spilled the beans on this one for media traction. Also, this was military – so although mediaite is flogging this story, it has nothing to do with “budget or no budget” changes (in other words Ellie, you’re wrong again – a perfect record).

seek said:
Elle I accidentally clicked on your “link” and thank you very much I had freaking nightmares!

Yer tough … you can handle it.

seek said:
Your hero is Ed Schultzzzzzzz? The guy who has more malice in his heart and spits when he talks? Oh yes, sorry, you’ve never heard him spew “hate” – never!!! Oh and how is his “I want to kick Fox’s assssss” working for him?

Have no idea what your talking about. My heroes are not TV hosts. My heroes would be Jesus, Buddha, Gandhi, Mother Teresa.

seek said:
You lie, you don’t listen and basically girlfriend it’s time for a retread.

Next time, warn us.

Yer fruit loops.

Have no idea Ellie? You truly have no idea and yet you have the gall to call me a fruit loop?
Did you even watch the “link” you posted? lol

Too funny (and profoundly sad) to think you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about.

seek said:
Have no idea Ellie? You truly have no idea and yet you have the gall to call me a fruit loop?
Did you even watch the “link” you posted? lol

Too funny (and profoundly sad) to think you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about.

I posted an interview of “Sully” Sullenberger talking about his feelings behind the defunding of Air Traffic Controllers which is pertinent to the topic of this thread. From that you took away that Ed Schultz is my hero. Do you disagree with what Sully had to say? Or do you agree? Or do you just dismiss what he had to say simply because he said it on the Ed Show?

Taking away from that interview that Schultz is my hero makes you a fruit loop. It also shows you are way too focused on personalities of the posters here rather than the substance of the topic at hand. That makes you quite shallow and a complete waste of my time. But have a nice day. :)

I am very thankful Ms. -0bama was not injured or killed.