Slam!!  I love it!  

Obama’s new slogan:
I may suck at economics, but I got Osama.

Who knew a Nobel Peace Prize was a license to kill .

It is never a good idea to believe your own BS. Republicans are on a hiding to nothing attacking Obama on war mongering and killing without trials. They are in serious risk of believing their own sh!t.

I can hear the soldiers who were directly involved with capturing or killing these Al Qaeda leaders and killing Osama bin Laden getting annoyed by President Obama taking credit for what they did.

Appease that teabaggers!!! 

 Boom Goes the dynamite. Your ass just got served.

More like, “I’m a Marxist but I got the bad guy!”

This joker’s re election campaign actually created a bumper sticker that says “My President killed bin Laden”

This clown thinks he’s every beloved figure reincarnated and he takes credit for the SEALS’
deed.

I’d rather ask Mark Kirk on his attempt to water down the legislation to sanction Iran.  Or, or, now stay with me here, I’d rather a reporter follow up with “How did you get the intel that led to his death?”  No reporter will?

Obama should be careful when he boasts about killing terrorists.  Conservatives loved tough talking Bush because he reminded them of a cowboy.  Tough talking Obama might remind them of gangsta rap.

Yeah if only he would have been spending his free time clearing a fake ranch of brush

hey remember when Bush pranced around in that flight suit after we “won”? Didn’t think so.

It’s fairly common for the Commander in Chief to not only lead on military matters, but to make note of success.  At least Obama is pointing to something real in response to political attack rather than spending time and money weaving a public fantasy.

http://www.famouspictures.org/mag/index.php?title=Bush_-_Mission_Accomplished

Desperation from a juvenile delinquent head of the Dem party.

A leader would not say that, but Barry is no leader, just a campaigner.

Once again this man child idiot gives an answer that was totally out of context and gets away with it!!
Could someone please tell our community organizer the difference between Governments and terrorists???

If we had a strong President the people of Iran very well could have overthrown Ackmanutjob…..but we don’t so were not able to!!!

Good answer

I don’t believe that the home, convicted criminal Antoin “Tony” Rezko , bought for the President has any brush .

Yeah!  Why should Obama take ANY credit for the actions of the soldiers under his command?!?!?!  Cause we ALL know that if any of their missions failed, nthisrain would be first to blame the soldiers for their mistakes. 

Remember when Bush came out announcing a major action against a terrorist immediately following the event destroying a plethora of intelligence that could’ve led to more terrorists being killed or captured?  Didn’t think so.

Yeah, except that Bush wanted to be thought of as a cowboy and Obama is about as gangsta as Carlton Banks. 

the OBAMANATOR!!!

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-egrG6qP5UQs/TcWYbC_76cI/AAAAAAAAD34/hio6xuJnpiA/s1600/barack+obama+killing+machine+rambo.jpg

Rezko bought Obama’s home?  Do tell!

HAHAHAHA
Don’t have a come back, change the subject.

Yeah, because news of Osama’s death NEVER would have leaked out.

Henry Kissinger.

^^^ Desperation.

I feel I have to ask this question to some of the posters on this site.

Is it difficult to move from your alternate universe to reality and back?

The word “appeasement” shall now disappear from American political discourse for the next 11 months.

Good job, O. You just might get another dollar from me after all.

“Obama wanted to purchase a home that the seller had a specific condition on: the adjacent empty lot to the house had to be purchased at the same time, ABC News reported. In the house deal, Rezko’s wife paid the full asking price for that parcel, $625,000.Obama shelled out $300,000 under the house’s asking price, paying $1.65 million, according to ABC News. Obama then purchased a part of Rezko’s lot for $104,500. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/68935.html#ixzz1fybqnt1u

Hate on him all you want, crazy people.

That was a hell of a line.

I like how not of that is true.  Good stuff.  Nice work!

keep spinning your fairy tales, it will probably take the sting out the fact that it took Obama less than 2 1/2 years to do what Bush couldn’t in nearly 7 1/2 years (despite using torture). Or are you one of those people who thinks Bush deserves all the credit? So hard to keep up with what wingnuts believe from week to week

The funny thing is this was dealing with a question about Israel. What does killing these terrorists have to do with the situation with Israel?  Wow odd response to say the least. Playing the Bin Laden card is nice and all but what does that have to do with the question asked?

“If we had a strong President the people of Iran very well could have overthrown Ackmanutjob…..but we don’t so were not able to!!!”How? My guess is Newt would put on an oversize Iron Man suit and go assassinate the Iranian government himself? 

The preparation beforehand didn’t leak.  The knowledge of where he was didn’t leak.  The specifics of how we got that information didn’t leak until a while afterwards.  Ya know what else didn’t leak?  That SEALs were involved, ya know, until Biden saw that as something else to leak.

Thinking about it, there’s a lot that Biden and Obama leaked that didn’t come from other people.  Huh…When’s the last time the President and Vice President having access to intelligence was a liability?

“No proof Rezko saved Obama money on home”
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/jun/17/republican-national-committee-republican/no-proof-rezko-saved-obama-money-on-home/

Your exclamation points really drive your excellent points home.  Maybe you could seal the deal with some ALL CAPS?!?!?!!

BAM! 

That was one of the best POTUS bitch-slaps to the press since Ronnie.

That’s because there was no “major action against a terrorist” under Bush. Well… except for the Patriot Act…but well… that makes us all terrorist.

Uh, actually, they waterboarded the delivery guy  to get information on where Osama was, so I’m not sure what you’re talking about.  But why listen to me?  Let’s just look to, I don’t know, the head of the CIA at the time, Leon Panetta http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/al-qaeda/8491509/Osama-bin-Laden-killed-CIA-admits-waterboarding-yielded-vital-information.html

Let’s face facts: without waterboarding, Osama would be alive.  That’s not opinion, that’s fact.

“Boneheaded” was the word Mr. Obama used then to describe his part in a real estate transaction made with Mr. Rezko in 2005, when the developer bought a lot next to the Obamas’ house here and sold them a strip of land to expand their yard.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/23/us/antoin-rezko-is-sentenced-to-over-10-years.html

President Obama seems to think that it is true , and that it did in fact happen Greg .

Politifact addressed the issue well.

Obama has repeatedly thanked the Seals and given them credit. Everyone but the Right has given the president credit for ordering a risky and highly dangerous operation that could’ve ended up getting no one or being the sort of military operation disasters we saw under Reagan, Clinton, Carter, and JFK. Given the political climate of the country, he was putting his presidency on the line so I think that deserves some credit even if the Seals deserve more.  

It looks as if Hillary lent Obama one of her balls.

“By asking if Obama knew about it, the question presumes the claim is true: that Rezko did, in fact, save Obama $300,000 on the purchase of his home.
Now it’s true that Obama paid $300,000 less than the asking price for a century-old mansion that he and his wife, Michelle, purchased from a Chicago doctor in 2005 for $1.65-million.
And on the same day the Obamas closed on their house, Rezko’s wife, Rita Rezko, bought a vacant lot next door from the same seller for $625,000, the full asking price. Obama said it was his understanding that there was another offer besides the Rezkos’ for the vacant lot at or near the asking price, thereby setting the market. ”

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/jun/17/republican-national-committee-republican/no-proof-rezko-saved-obama-money-on-home/

Pure coincidence I’m sure Greg . 

I do remember some intelligence not being read in August of 2001 because someone didn’t want to interrupt a vacation.  I also remember someone sitting stoned face for nine minutes, finishing a children’s book no less, after being told our country was under an attack.

Oh damn!
Well this is the music playing as he burns out of there on a Harley:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9SMXkpowo0

Context was appropriate. The question included “the middle east.” Unless you know who runs the government of “the middle east?”

No, a “leader” would fly in on a Lockheed S-3 Viking and declare “Mission Accomplished” mere months into the decade-long illegal war he chose to start for no reason, right?

Like he really runs Iran

The question was about the GOP talking points about Obama and his approach to foreign policy as it concerns Israel and the middle east.

The funnier thing is your selective hearing.

Man-child? why dont you just come out and call him boy? know your place boy !!!
So you want war with Iran, why? were they responsible for 911 like Iraq was?
keep talking, we need ignorant people like you, so we can point and laugh. 

And yet YOUR PRESIDENT chose to invade a country that posed no risk to the United States, utterly neutering any ability to successfully mobilize the military when the need actually arose, when he damn well knew that Iran was pursuing nuclear technology. 

Actually, YOUR PRESIDENT also chose to empower Iran by invading its two most ferocious enemies in the region, Iraq and Afghanistan, single-handedly paving the way for Iran to grossly expand its influence in the region, as it is now doing in Iraq.

Obviously the incompetent community organizer if flustered……maybe he should display his photo-shopped birth certificate again!!

Um, that Obama never has and never will pursue a strategy of “appeasement” in the Middle East?  

Did you even read the article? The synchronicity is explained and supported.

Donna Schwan, with MetroPro Realty, which listed both the house and the vacant lot, recalled that there were several offers on both the house and the lot, though she could not remember the amount of those other offers and said she has since discarded the offer sheets.

“The most important thing to the sellers was to close on the same day,” Schwan said, as they did not want one of the properties to sit unsold, alone.

Bush, Cheney, and ALL Republicans appeased Osama Bin Laden (and the rest of the Saudis who attacked us on 9/11) for eight years.  They continue to do so today.  Facts are facts.

Yes, it is actually, so they save the energy and stay in the alternate universe.

Jupiter, stop using facts! we all know facts have a liberal bias. We all know bush kept ‘murika safe, except for the largest attack on US soil. LEAVE HIM ALONE ! ! ! ! !

Remember when Bush had bin Laden in his sights months after 9/11, and chose to allow him to escape into Pakistan instead?  

“One could certainly argue that the Rezkos’ purchase, and their flexibility on the closing date, helped assure that the Obamas’ offer was accepted. The real estate agent made clear that getting the two properties sold at the same time was a priority for the seller. ”
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/jun/17/republican-national-committee-republican/no-proof-rezko-saved-obama-money-on-home/

Pure coincidence . “Coincidence” , I say , Greg .

Taking credit for the work of those that came before him is not a dismissal of the charge that he is an appeaser in the Middle East. It means he was forced to pull the trigger on UBL because not to do so would have been catastrophic to his administration. Taking the lesson from Bill Clinton, when he failed to take out UBL, is part and parcel to his decision to take out UBL. Plain and simple. In every other case, he has been an appeaser, especially where it concerns Israel’s enemies. This president has failed miserably on foreign policy and he has chosen to support the wrong people in the Middle East, time and time again. We had the opportunity to help the poeple of Iran throw down their government and end the rule of the religious zealots that control that country and that are the cornerstone of nearly all violence in that region. Obama is an appeaser, an apologizer and has repeatedly taken the wrong stance on foreign policy around the world.

Thank GOD!  A conversation about Obama whooping terrorist a$$ has turned into another birther discussion.

Ba-freakin-COCK!

I hope all Coloradans aren’t this stupid.

That’s funny!  Ya know, that sorta jogs my memory a bit.  Sorta like how a President didn’t take a wanted terrorist when Sudan was offering to extradite him here http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/9/10/181819.shtml  That terrorist, of course, being Osama bin Laden and the event he was related to was the 1993 WTC bombing.

I vaguely remember a former terrorist being interviewed and saying that the inaction of a President was what caused 9/11 http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2010/March/Ex-Terrorist-Gives-CBN-Glimpse-Inside-Al-Qaeda/  Of course, that President being Clinton.

I, more or less, remember the former head of the CIA’s bin Laden unit stating “”The former president seems to be able to deny facts with impugnity. Bin Laden is alive today because Mr. Clinton, Mr. Sandy Berger, and Mr. Richard Clarke refused to kill him” http://newsbusters.org/node/7871

I also vaguely remember the “Mistress of Disaster,” Jamie Gorelick, having a thing or two to do with intelligence communities not being able to share intelligence to stop 9/11.  I remember that from a documentary on NGC.

And I do remember Bush waiting to leave.  I do remember the children he was with that he didn’t want to scare.  Indeed, I do remember that.

My hearing is fine, it still doesn’t answer the question about dealing with Israel & Palestine conflict. I understand it was a good line and thats all that biased people look for. Sorry I was looking for a real answer not just the typical talking points. My bad for expecting so much from a sitting President instead of the typical biased junk.

Flustered? Incompetent? You didn’t watch the clip, colorado, did you?

The question was about GOP accusations of appeasement, so there’s that. 

Barack, Barack, Barack, who are you trying to fool?   You are an appeaser of the highest order. Appeaser-in-chief, in fact!!!!

Just remind me, was that before or after Clinton allowed him to live to commit 9/11?

Spin?? You’re a carousel about to rotate off it’s axis…

First of all it was the intelligence community (that it took a decade to rebuild after Clinton all but dismantled it) found him.

Secondly it was the US Navy seal team who prosecuted the assault on bin Laden.

President Obama gave the order to engage, which resulted in Osama’s death and for that Obama can rightly take credit.

A true leader would ride in the back of a fighter jet and land on a carrier and declare mission accomplished. right Gloves?

please, enlighten us as to how you would have preffered a leader defend himself from charges of appeasement?

Does Walt know that you are in here? -Muhahaha!!

In Fact Greg , I read very well.

“The fact that the Rezkos agreed to purchase the vacant lot on that date in mid June, “could have been to their (the Obamas’) advantage, absolutely,” Schwan said.
“Each was contingent on the other selling,” she said.”

 http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/jun/17/republican-national-committee-republican/no-proof-rezko-saved-obama-money-on-home/

Pure coincidence I’m sure Greg .

Oh, snow soul?  So the Bush administration, which stopped using waterboarding almost TEN YEARS AGO (in 2003), chose to sit on that actionable intelligence for years and years but do nothing about it?  

I mean, we all know that George W. Bush didn’t give two shits about catching bin Laden (he said so himself), but you really think he had that little respect for the victims of 9/11?

I love watching conservatives go batcrap random when they get owned. Name-calling and issue deflecting rules their day today!

I imagine it’s pretty easy to fool you.  In fact, in my experiences, folks who punctuate their rantings with 4 exclamation points are particularly susceptible to being fooled.

“Taking credit for the work of those that came before him…”

We’re all laughing at you.

OBAMO’s just bitter because he’s clinging to the notion that he’s in charge of his own narrative (which, of course, he’s not). The Angry OBAMO is surfacing, and it’s good to see. He’s one Leftist who’s not going to build respect by getting more bitter. Paul Krugman’s the same way. Bitter, clinging Leftists.

. . . you do not know me so don’t be making any personal remarks about who or what I am. I am easily not fooled!!!!!!!!!!!!! And I cannot be fooled by a light weight like you!!!!!!!

Hey snowsoul!  I think Bush allowed him to escape after he murdered 3,000 people during Bush’s presidency.

“In every other case, he has been an appeaser, especially where it concerns Israel’s enemies.”

That’s funny, because Israelis seem to see it differently. 

http://www.mediaite.com/online/happy-new-year-president-obama-sees-dramatic-jump-in-poll-of-israeli-citizens/

And YOUR PRESIDENT along with his warped ideology has destroyed the country and trampled all over the Constitution.  

Birthers…gotta love them, while theyre preoccupied with the Presidents birth certificate, Obama was readying Osama’s death certificate. Orly Taitz, where you??

snow soul;

You mean when the Bush administration utterly ignored the plan to combat terrorism crafted by Richard Clarke on behalf of Clinton right before Bush took office?  You know, the plan that a senior Bush administration official described as “everything we’ve done since 9/11″?

Or perhaps you mean the assassination authorization that Clinton issued directly after the embassy bombings?

Or perhaps you’re referring to the two former Reagan counterterrorism officials, Robert Oakley and Paul Bremer, who, in praising the Clinton administration’s unprecedented focus on terrorism, merely disagreed over whether or not Clinton had focused TOO MUCH on bin Laden:

“Overall, I give [the Clinton administration] very high marks [on counterterrorism].  The only major criticism I have is the obsession with Osama…”  [Robert Oakley] (whereas Bremer thought Clinton “correctly focused on bin Laden.”)

Going into Pakistan to kill Bin Laden without fear of war with Pakistan or making concessions to the Pakistani gov’t…that is certainly not a policy of appeasement on a nation-state (Pakistan) level dummy.  Get you head out of the snow.

I’d say killing the terrorists Clinton let live freely would qualify you and your statement as moronic.

Seek help.

Don’t feed the trolls.

New conservative slogan: It on’t matter w-hat dat n****r does I’s hate’s em!

If the best you can do is implicate wrongdoing without evidence, then you are completely par for the right wing course while falling far short of proving the case. Great work.

If the best you can do is implicate wrongdoing without evidence, then you are completely par for the right wing course while falling far short of proving the case. Great work.

From that very story, those polls were taken after Obama decided that he had to stop the UN from takng action that would destabilize the region…
“US President Barack Obama succeeded in reaching out to Israelis with his speech last Friday to the General Assembly and his efforts to block the UN from unilaterally declaring a Palestinian state, according to a Keevoon Research poll sponsored by The Jerusalem Post this week.”

That also does not dismiss his appeasement. Polls in Israel do not equate to world opinion, and of course conservative thinking, which is that Obama is an appeaser.

And for the record, COB, Bill Clinton TRIPLED the counterterrorism budget for the FBI, and DOUBLED counterterrorism funding overall.

Beyond that, Richard Clarke crafted a counterterrorism plan for the Clinton administration directly before Bush took office, a plan that the Bush administration did NOTHING with for the nine months before 9/11.  What did that plan contain?  ”[E]verything that we’ve done since 9/11,” according to a senior Bush administration official.

hahahahaha!  That is great comedy!  Kudos

u need to check in a mental ward asap…

Wow, you’re a crazy person.  Do you know that?

Now that is the Chicago way.

Your “America is afraid of an angry black man” theory of GOP victory in 2012 won’t work on a person America voted to be the freakin’ president of the United States.

He is a child idiot? They said, ‘you apease our enemies’, he said, ‘no I shoot them in the head’, which is true. I don’t like it but that is what the man has been doing for the last three years. Your fantasies don’t change the reality.

Right?  I see birthers on this thread, unbelievable….really top shelf stupidity.

If the best you can do is absolve wrongdoing without evidence Greg, then you are completely par for the left wing course while falling far short of proving the case. Great work.

“light weight?”

Now, I’m curious as to how much misdirection is applied in wrestling.

And yet finds himself in frequent agreement with the most aggressive right wingers on the site.

Right, because everyone knows that reversing the economy from losing 700,000+ jobs per month to creating 100,000+ jobs per month is “destroying” the country.

As for your Constitution bit, having actually studied the Constitution quite a bit in law school, I can assure you that the only Constitution the President has trampled is the imaginary one that Tea Partiers claim to love and yet want to amend 6 ways to Sunday.  

You sound like as big a dumbass as the hack that got bitch slapped in the press room this morning…..LOL

May be the best statement he’s made all year.   Now,  this link is for my fellow libs and you Dems out there.   It is NOT for the teabagger loons around here so do not click it.

Libs Only, or authors of this site

loon–can’t fix someone stuck on stupid!!!

Not all, just losers like you that still think obama is a Saint and do not have the moral or fundamental facility to decern the truth from fiction. I am sure that if obama were President when the 9/11 attack occured he would have merely dismissed it as a pesky workplace act of violence.

. . . down to your last brain cell it seems.

You mean George W?  Did you vote for him?

“Taking credit for the work of those that came before him.”

Assuming those who came before were not robots, the word should be “who,” not “that.” Tell Tex that between your giggles.

Also, such credit is why we’re all blaming Reagan for our current economy now, and not Bush. Bush was just a babysitter. This economy is Reagan’s baby.

Took time to build up the proper intelligence.  Hell, it took what, 8 months of solid training to prepare the SEALs for this mission?

Additionally, Scheuer said Clarke was the reason bin Laden was alive.  I’m just missing why the guy who seems to have sat on his ass and did nothing the entirety of his tenure in his position would be an authority on anything of significance.  Perhaps he could show us what Sandy Berger shoved down his pants and stole from the National Archives, but I won’t hold my breath.  Oh, yeah, also, there’s this from Scheuer “Scheuer thinks Clarke is a risk-averse poseur who didn’t do enough to fight bin Laden prior to September 11, 2001. At his breakfast with reporters, Scheuer said that on 10 separate occasions his unit, codename “Alec,” provided key policymakers with information that could’ve led to the killing or capture of Osama bin Laden. “In each of those 10 instances, the senior policymaker in charge, whether it was Sandy Berger, Richard Clarke, or George Tenet,” resisted taking action, afraid it would result in collateral damage or a backlash on the Arab street. According to Scheuer, Clarke’s story has changed in the time since.” http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/954cfheq.asp?pg  If you’re looking to extol the virtues of a coward, I would see no better fit than to say Clarke should’ve been listened to.

Assassination orders are just dandy!  I just step back and wonder where they were after the first WTC bombing.  Or when he was in the scope of the American officer, as shown in The Path to 9/11.  Also, those 10 times prior speak volumes more than the order.  No one remembers the actions of a failure, they remember the actions of success.

That’s great for them to praise him.  Now just gotta wonder…What would the 2,996 people who died say?

Barry, it’s refreshing to see a liberal boast about the murder of someone who could have been brought to trial. Let’s hear ya boast about the American citizen you also murdered without  due process.

Little Caesar doing an impressive imitation of Little ‘Dirty Rat!’

Poor thing- Anne is nailing you libs!

She is striking multiple nerves!

The burden of proof is on the prosecution… at least in America. This is still America right?

He didn’t have a license to “kill”; the peacemaker had a license to MURDER! He murdered a US citizen without due process also.

3  dead Somalian pirates that shared  the same fate as Osama bin Laden in 2009,soon after Obama took office would concur. Obama is not an appeaser.

The appeasement demagoguery appeals to the Republican base. Let Romney try and win the general election using that rhetoric.

They had just photoshopped it by then! LOL

LOL

“If the best you can do is absolve wrongdoing without evidence Greg, then you are completely par for the left wing course while falling far short of disproving the case. Great work.”

Good choice but also consider this for exit music. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Djj7jW6ny2M

Son, let Barry try to win on his economic accomplishments!

So let’s see:  George W. Bush chose not to get bin Laden AFTER 9/11 – with all the benefits of hindsight and the blood of 3,000 Americans flooding the streets of New York – and yet it is Clinton who owes an explanation to the victims of 9/11?

I must say, I find it outright bizarre that you would even bring  up the first WTC attack:  it took place 38 DAYS after Clinton took office, whereas 9/11 took place 9 MONTHS after Bush took office.  And yet BOTH are Clinton’s fault?

Logic’s not your strong point, is it?

Haha – with that comment CC, we’re all going to start taking you seriously! (LMAO).

Another moron Birther. 

Just what the world needs…

…another idiot!

Obama is an appeaser, an apologizer and has repeatedly taken the wrong stance on foreign policy around the world.

…Of course!

Tell that to Osama, when you can dig him up…

Killing a terrorist does not equate to Obama’s not being an Appeaser.

The really funny thing is you don’t even know what you’re talking about in making your insane post…you mean “Photoshopped” right?  As in using the Adobe program Photoshop to make changes to a graphic image?  Not photo-shopped, as in you went to the mall shopping for photos, right?

You are simply dumb as dirt.

Can you just imagine if Corzine the crook was in any way shape or form tied to The Tea party? Tommy and his crack staff of one? would be putting up a post every 10 minutes. Instead, it’s just ignored by the regressives. Classy.

Obama brags about killining someone and the left cheers. Note how brave and manly the left has gotten.

It hurts right now to be a Teabagging/Republican. 

Michele, Sarah, Rick, Herman, Rick are not cutting it right now, so what’s left…

…Mitt, Newt and maybe Donald ‘Birther’ Trump.

That’s nonsense!  He could fire Holder for wasting resources for investigating the CIA officers who were given permission by lawyers to perform the waterboarding, he could fire him for allowing guns to walk across the border in Fast & Furious which resulted in hundreds of innocent Mexicans dying, in addition to an American border agent and marine.  He could quit blaming Israel for everything and portraying terrorists as misunderstood(What was Nidal Hassan’s actions classified as again?).

Now move along child and quit using race as a scapegoat.

Wow, look at the hysterical irrational ignorant anger because there’s a black family in the White House.

So funny to watch.

“killining”? “has”?

LOL

Obama appeased the environmental whackos by not deciding on the pipeline till after the election.

After next Nov., he’ll okay it, unless Canada goes west with it , selling the oil to China first.

He’s probably already cleared it with his bosses, Trumka and Hoffa.

Do you make up these things off the top of your head, or does somebody actually convince you of their validity?

See response to Anne

Still waiting for you to explain STEP BY STEP how an illegal alien becomes president.

‘Want the real story on why Cain and Palin are out of the race?’

…Incompetence!

If your a GOP candidate you just got bitch slapped by Obama.

Of course this is America , and of course this isn’t a court or court room , so the burden , then ,appropriately falls on our politicians not to enter into shady land deals with their largest contributors .

Or are you still of the mindset that it was a coincidence that the President , and one of his largest contributors closed on adjoining properties on the same day unbeknownst to each other .

Had I killed Osama with a rusty teaspoon I’d brag about it.

Maybe you forgot what he did. Stoner, always coming through like a moron.

I’m sure Colorado_Conservative will pretend to not know why language like that, and the continued association of community organizers with something negative, will only result in the continued problems Repubs have with the minorities they complain don’t vote for them.

Here’s a picture…

http://blog.nj.com/njv_auditor/2009/09/large_obama-corzine.jpg

he did it to shut up the crackpots and wingnuts and Donald Trump: pity it didn’t work.

You morons were more concerned with renaming french fries than with bringing the terrorists to justice. The facts will never go away.

…On the other hand, the world desperately needs another Conspiracy Theorist.

But don’t ask Bashar al-Assad, cuz we’z cool wit dat 

…which is evidence of…

Umm…. it was entirely legal. Perhaps this will refresh your memory:
AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ243/content-detail.html

Seems to me like the 14 million unemployed have been “bitch slapped” by Obama for almost two years now. -Just saying…

…Of course.

It’s genius….

Well, you mad some great points. Thanks for breaking it down for us.

You have a problem with that comment, but not the Birther nonsense? Telling.

Yup. Stopped reading after that line.

Yeah, you’d think our Republican-led House would be doing everything in its power to fulfill those 2010 campaign promises of…ya know…creating jobs. Right?

You f’ing hypocrite .. and if he hadn’t gotten bin Laden you’d be complaining. 

You’re a parody, right?

Overheard in a Honolulu, Hawaii delivery room on August 4, 1961:

The head nurse spoke up and said “leave this one alone, I can tell by the way… that he’s bad to the bone, bad to the bone,ba..ba..ba..ba..ba BAD,ba..ba..ba..ba..ba..BAD,ba..ba..ba..ba..ba..BAD,Bad To The Bone…”

There’s a few birthers, right here on this site, whose existence supports his Rouge’s argument.

And yet, 10 years after the President under whom IT DID occur didn’t get him, Obama somehow managed to pull it off. Funny that…

Well… If Clinton had a DETAILED memo telling him that there was going be a terrorist attack that would involve planes, at least he would have prevented that from happening. That’s right, 9/11 HAPPENED ON BUSH’S WATCH AND HE FAILED TO KEEP AMERICANS SAFE. 

You’re smarter than that. Anyone can read the House record and read the bills passed by the House and subsequently tabled or defeated in the Democratic controlled Senate.

Here is a link: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/crecord/

Geee…I guess next week…Obammy will do the ol’ penis comparison…mine is bigger than yours…

“The birther thing isn’t nonsense”

Telling. Nice talking to you. Moving on.

You really do believe everything the chosen one tells you!! Good grief!!
I bet you also believe that unemployment went down to 8.6% from 9.1% !!

WOW!! Paid bloggers coming out of the woodwork. You are the 4th one or may you are one with 4 or 5 or 6 names. ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nice analogy, but the Repubs should learn that if you’re the guy in the room who can’t find his knob with a magnifying glass you shouldn’t be calling for a penis measuring contest. It’s just not smart.

Ooooo….and I was SO hoping he would get a good opportunity to remind everyone exactly who took out bin Laden. Now…where’s that cigarette…

Wow, did you need a Thesaurus (that’s a book containing synonyms and sometimes antonyms genius) to change my insult ever so slightly?  Hahaha -gold jerry, pure gold.

you are related to that orly taitz right, you share her insanity.

LMAO. What makes it so funny is that Mouse is serious.

http://ObamasDirtyLittleSecret.blogspot.com

how do you know this???  Have you examined it and held it in your hands, used a black light on it, searched for the age of the paper fibers, you have no personal experience about this, you are a racist hater!!

Again, you need to “prove” that the land deal was “shady” with “evidence” and not “implication” unsupported by “facts” because the “rule of law” is an American “ideal” and not just a legal “formality

Impropriety,  Greg , is self-evident.

poor conservatives – still upset that Bin Laden is dead.

another fake scandal the GOP loves to obsess on, despite the fact that nothing has, or ever will come of it.

No matter when it goes …China will have it any way.

Must be some FOX NATION strays!!!

do you even know what a Marxist is??, or a communist?  or a facist?  or a nazi?  or a socialist.  Why don’t the right wing crazies make up their mind, they use these terms interchangeably and are ignorant of the meaning of all.

Yeah….a jobs bill that doesn’t actually do anything to create jobs doesn’t really help the people, especially when the people can easily see that the Republican-sponsored jobs bill does nothing to actually create jobs. Now…does it?

Hey Anne, is that all ya got? Lame…

Join Al-Q expect a drone missile coming down on you……….

Like Reagan was with Iran in the 80′s?

____________________!!!

you might want to upgrade tin foil brands. that generic store brand doesn’t block out the crazy waves as well.

way to misspell his typo…feel stupid? you should.

Listen, there’s no need to deal in such dishonest tactics. The Republicans provide plenty enough ammunition without you trying to embarrass them with your parody routine. Besides, it’s just too over the top. No one is buying it.

When did Bush, Bush Sr., Reagan, Clinton, Nixon or any of the other 43 previous Presidents have to “release their birth certificates”…and what is different about Barack Obama?

–Cobra

Who died and made you king and did you inform O??

and proof he didn’t read it: when the first plane struck, he joked “that’s an awfully bad pilot.”
You’d think if he read the PDB that specifically cited planes, he might have realized what was happening.

Killing someone who was sitting around in his underwear watching porn really isn’t something to brag about…unless you’re really desperate to get re-elected.

Have you compared it to Ronald Reagan’s birth certificate?

–Cobra

That’s funny too because I remember Bush’s Dad, his boss, and future secretary of defense all using tax payer money to help train and arm the same guy in the 70′s and 80′s. I also remember Bush and his dad having some big business deals with the family of they guy too. They also helped arm and stood behind a second axis of evil guy because he was at war with the third axis of evil guy (who we were secretively giving arms too)

As for your last point, didn’t want to scare children??? Only if he jumped up screaming and rushed out the door. A simple “excuse me, I have some business to attend too”
would have done the job and not scared the children. Nine minutes. Let me put it this way, if he had to go to the bathroom, or if Laura called, or he heard news that one of his daughters were hurt, would he have sat there for nine minutes?

you are truly insane.

please provide a link this supposed official Obama bumper sticker – or admit that you’re just making shit up.

Here are some more personal attacks:

You’re not very smart.
You didn’t graduate high school.
You’re not good looking.
You make people around you uncomfortable.

Yes.

Right Wingers would’ve demanded that Bush’s image be immediately carved into Mt. Rushmore if Bin Laden was killed during his administration.

 Who are you kidding?

–Cobra

It’s not a Nobel Appease Price

lol!
Mr. Tough guy?
lol!

Let’s ask Syria
Iran
Israel
Egyptian “Brotherhood”

And remember the Worldwide Grovelling Tour!

We’re:
Ignored by Europe
Ignored by N. Korea
Ignored by China

He’s yet to even visit the nation-state hated most by Democrats – Israel.

Hey buddy!

http://www.itgetsbetter.org

Yawn.

http://www.itgetsbetter.org

So close to staying on topic.

Ready to graduate Kindergarten now aren’t you. Or you could be graduating with a PHD from loon school. Or you are a master taster for Kool-Aide.

Way to defend a moron.  You feel like an idiot?  You should.

Is Gloves having a sad? :(

All men (women) are created equal… that’s in the self evident category. Obama benefited improperly on a land deal… that needs support outside of classical liberal philosophy.

Should all African-Americans be required to show “papers”, or just the first Black President?

–Cobra

Operation Wide Receiver under Bush and Gonzales didn’t make your list, did  it?  Now why is that?

–Cobra

I think we have a winner for the Best GOP Comeback to the Fact that Obama Got Osama!

“It’s not that big of a deal.  I could have done it.  But I didn’t want to.”

Yes.  George W. Bush–the Ivy League, Connecticut Cowboy.

–Cobra

No, but repealing punitive regulations that are thwarting business expansion and job creation will.

another sock puppet wielding regressive that despises the constitution…nice.

Well that term simply does not apply to your drinking prowess.
:OP

Excuse me…you’re not saying that the Israel-Palestine conflict should be settled by an American President and not the Israelis and Palestinians are you?

–Cobra

COB, meet international law.  International law, meet COB.

look up “defend” and get back to me, mark.

“For the impropriety is self-evident and obvious to anyone who possesses even the slightest capacity for reason.”- ~ orrologion

Obama benefited improperly on a land deal… that needs support outside of classical liberal philosophy.

Or , a sense of morality .

way to defend the crooks in washington

For the life of me, I have no clue what you are talking about.  Shouldn’t you be ranting about a birth certificate or something?

That tin-foil hat of yours is on a bit too tight, isn’t it?

–Cobra

And we should believe you? What expertise do you have? Any connection to world net daily? 

And ARE YOU KIDDING ME????????? Pains dirty little secret blog spot on your profile????? Really………….do you believe all that??? Get a life.

I’m pretty sure Jamie Gorelick saw to it that memo wasn’t created.  There was a NGC special and a CIA agent said he was running around trying to connect the dots but couldn’t because of the wall of separation his administration set up.

…Of Course.

Osama BIn Laden was a nobody, that represented nothing to this country. President Obama certainly appeased him.

Of Course…

Yaaaawn.  Did you say something?

Your comments make me sleepy, Stan.

“Osama, sleeps wit da fishes” -Obama Corleone.

LMFAO. The mouse continues to expose just how batty it is.

A bit of advice:  don’t imply someone is childish and then immediately ask if they have a “PHD from loon school.”  That, and don’t be a hayseed.  It’s unbecoming.

Way to defend child rapists.

Well, that’s a flawed comparison, which I’m sure even you know.  Because as I’m sure you know, the governments of America and Mexico were in agreement with this to track them, unlike Fast & Furious.  Additionally, as I’m sure you know, the guns sold were fitted with RFID tracking units to watch and see where they go to trace their movements and see all the hot spots.  There’s more and you can read it here http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/282606/fast-furious-was-bushs-fault-andrew-c-mccarthy

I would say, to your list of what you are, you should add “Moron.”  That would seem to fit quite nicely as you just demonstrated here.

A poster’s use of “lol” is inversely proportional to the intelligence and maturity of that poster.

It would make a good movie……try selling the rights to Hollywood…… I am REALLY impressed you think I am a plant by “BIG BROTHER………lets meet for a drink?;)

Please take your mouse someplace else.

I don’t take advice from left-wing, Kool-aide drinking radical ______________. Not even a BIT.

yes, please tell the poster sometimes known as “grafx” that, please.

BTW did you read your previous reply to me???

_______?!?!?!  The suspense is killing me!!!!

Of course you were there on the ground and saw all of this first hand right?

but yours is?????

Bush seems to have done a lot more in response to one terrorist attack than Clinton did to a lot.  Well, ya know, until a certain blue dress with a certain stain appeared which I’m sure had nothing at all to do with it and was purely a coincidence.

Both are Clinton’s fault.  He did nothing to respond to make AQ think there’d be consequences for their actions, as a former member of AQ stated.  He did nothing to stop the Mistress of Disaster.

Oh yeah, and then there’s the whole crippling the intelligence community and military.  The commander of one of the largest military bases in the country told my dad when we went for an air show that it’d be 8 years before we were to where we should be in military R&D because of Clinton’s destruction of the forces, but I’m sure that also wasn’t Clinton’s fault either.  And that was back in 2007 or so.  With all the cuts now, wonder how far back we are now.

Thanks, I got that over an hour ago. They go by many names and never have an avatar.

If that terrorist was the mastermind of 9/11, then yes it does.
Nyah  nyah  nyuh  NYYAAHH  nyah!

The very same reason why the current occupant of the WH will be out of office at the completion of his first term.

How in the hell are they able to jump to Rezko bought Obama’s house from the appeasement issue in this story.  Obama Derangement Syndrome in full effect with Anne and the other righty loonies.

George W Bush failed miserably over 8 years to get Bin Laden. Case closed.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. 

Why don’t you go away?

Have you ever said anything interesting?

And only YOU know the truth.  A true sign of psychosis.  Seek therapy.  Or just go get laid.

…Sure!

Exactly around the same time Herman Cain, Sarah Palin or Donald Trump get back in the race…

..Maybe Mitt or Newt or maybe not!

After all you should know right? You were there in Afghanistan hunting for him.

Hey mouse, what’s up with that blog site “Dirty Little Secrets…” I was lmao reading some of that stuff. ;)

You are meaningless. dip shit.

Corn??

Barack kicks ass and conservatives pretend he doesn’t. hilarious.

Spot on!

Way to deflect there Prezzy,just lead with guys you had killed,always shuts em up huh?

Libs, for all their presumed intelligence & haughtiness, really only know two words:

THASS RAYCESS!

Booyah!  The Baller’s back.  Those turds are all DEAD and with their respective virgins of course.  What a stupid question.

Bashar al Assad not so much….

This thread should be a celebration about the President smacking down the silly teabagger appeasement meme. Buck_Down you failed.  Not because you aren’t 100% right but because you fed the troll and let Anne 1 and other teabaggers get this thread off topic with irrelevant lies to the point where you have to go down about 25-30 messages to get back on topic.

Get on topic bonehead or get off the pot.

What do you propose or would like to see the president of the USA to do about these?

Close of business?

Oh, SNAP! Obama: 1  Republicans 0

Big Brother knows where you live. Please go hid under your bed, and save yourself.

You mean the Republican governor and senator from Nebraska who were strongly opposed to the pipeline in its current form, you mean those environmental wackos. I guess republicans are only for states rights when it suits them huh?!? Way to buy into the propaganda.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-22/heineman-s-nebraska-pipeline-showdown-hints-at-red-state-environmentalism.html

While at the same time corporate profits are at an all-time-high 
http://tinyurl.com/4rvrxdm 

Brilliant.

On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Foil Helmets:An Empirical Study

http://berkeley.intel-research.net/arahimi/helmet/ 

”
The helmets amplify frequency bands that coincide with those allocated to the US government between 1.2 Ghz and 1.4 Ghz. According to the FCC, These bands are supposedly reserved for ”radio location” (ie, GPS), and other communications with satellites (see, for example, [3]). The 2.6 Ghz band coincides with mobile phone technology. Though not affiliated by government, these bands are at the hands of multinational corporations.It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC. We hope this report will encourage the paranoid community to develop improved helmet designs to avoid falling prey to these shortcomings”

Yeah, I’ll definitely give that one to Obama. 

SORTED.

This Yankee has a mighty big ego. Our military forces did the work.

Braggin’ ain’t becomin’.

If Mr. Obama got bin Laden, then he also killed 25 Paki soldiers recently and just lost our Republic’s newest spy drone.  Nice job, n’est-ce pas?

You’re right…Moochelle castrated Barry years ago…explains his penchant for drugged up gay guys…thanks for reminding me…

He was such a phony today. He loves giving credit to Bush for everything but forgot to credit Bush with the kills saying comments like we got Bin Laden and # 2,3,4,2 2,5 2, dddd…

Bush went into Iraq…. and forgot all about Osama.

4,500 us soliders died in Iraq…

If that’s the rule, why was President Bush strutting around on the Abraham Lincoln in a flight suit back in 2003 declaring “Mission Accomplished” in Iraq?

Whatever…

Next question: Okay, OTHER THAN Bin Laden, what has he done other than appease radical islam in the middle east?

This folks, is what you used to call a Chickenhawk.

Bush had 8yrs to bring him to trial

For all the jokes among conservatives that Obama is a teleprompter president, Obama can be very quick on his feet and sharp with his responses.

Newt shouldn’t get too cocky.  If by some disaster of history he actually became the GOP nominee, he’ll have an uphill fight against Obama in a presidential debate.

figures put the US death toll at 575 during Bush’s era in Afghanistan, but with repeated escalations by Mr. Obama 1,153 troops died in just 33 months, with no end in sight. See definition of “kakistocracy.”

That answer is priceless. Period!

It’s hilarious when you hear all the chickenhawks on the right how they would do this and do that and Obama is weak on terror…. I can guarantee you this answer will be in the back of their head on any foreign policy questions. As it should be…

Obama: ” As a Constitutional lawyer, I am most concerned about civil rights; that is why I am opposed to pouring water down an enemy combatant’s  nose and instead prefer sending troops to murder  him or in the case of a US citizen, murdering him with a hell-fire missile.

son, too bad his debt isn’t!

That ranks right up there with ……..”give me a waterboard, Dick Cheney and one hour and I’ll have him confess to the Sharon Tate murders”    

say, are you one of those “anti-war” nuts turned war monger?

…wonder which way Eric Holder’s appeasement will go???? HMMMMM?

Osama bin Laden was the victim of workplace violence.

Neither. sorry. I wish Bush would have done it when he had a chance but we all know what happened with that.

What does that have to do with the price of apples?

Lady don’t get me started. I can give you a laundry list of crap on many from the GOP including Bush, Cheney, Good old Newt, Good old  what his name that just drop out of the GOP race. On and On and On. Don’t bring up media innuendo.

Neither? LOL!

Well, how would you rank “I will never stand for a national anthem again. I will turn my back and I will raise a fist” on your chart?  Same ex-pro wrestler said both.  Just asking…

lmao you tea baggers are still upset that osama is dead?

Fixing Bush’s mess

It’s not Obamas fault troops went into Iraq… thank God they are on their way home

OBAMA 2012

“The list of senior terrorists killed during the Obama presidency is fairly extensive.

In June 2010 in Pakistan, al Qaeda commander Hamza al-Jawfi was killed.”

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/the-terrorist-notches-on-obamas-belt/
 
 I understand that many right wingers in here would rather ghoulishly dig up the remains of all these dead terrorists, refrigerate them, and hold them for a future White Republican President to prop up and “re-kill” them live on Fox News and Hate Radio, proving their toughness on national defense.

   Much easier than giving the Obama Administration credit for anything, right?

–Cobra

*hic*

Try going through life without so much anger and resentment. Give that dog in your avatar a hug or something. They say pets reduce stress.

I detect a note of desperation, denial and a lot of evasion in the rightwing responses to this thread. We are still a warmongering nation, but Obama has cut down on that considerably, especially with the Libyan caper, and his killing of bin Laden was daring and masterful. Yes, it would have been great to get bin Laden and bring him to the Hague, not Guantanamo, for a show trial, but that wasn’t going to happen. I really think the jig is up for the Republican/Tea Party troublemakers, and they could be heading towards a total collapse in Nov 2012. The public is beginning to catch on that the rightwingers have absolutely nothing to offer the American people but more misery, negativity and unsuccessful manipulation. One party rule by a reenergized Democrat Party for the next four years may be the way we have to go until the Republicans come to their senses.

Name any White Presidents you asked to see a birth certificate from.

–Cobra

Who’s talking about him.. I’m talking about the statement… classic..

I don’t care who said it. The line is a classic…   So is “Corportations are people my friend.”

Let me get this Straight.  The “SCANDAL” is that Obama bought a 1.9 Million Dollar home for 1.65?  Well then I Scandled too as I got a 400K house for 200K……

DAMNNNNN!
BOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!

as i said before==we ain’t seen nothin’ yet~

obama ain’t no shrinking violet—

LETS ROLL~

now you know…
now you will witness the LICENSE TO THRILL..
in the 2012–gop massacre..
be careful not to trip over the entrails~

Is your guarantee as good as Mr. Obama’s when his kakistocracy promised unemployment wouldn’t get above 8%?

because you believe in stupid shit..
try reading..
and stop ‘believing’ dumb crap..ok?

ah—you miss bin laden…
ok..

make sure to buy the T-shirt that you support Bin Laden over our president..

and he also spanked Donnie thump while he was at it..

and that is nuttin’
he got rid of prejudice against gays in the military..
got insurance for millions..
save the economy..
saved the auto industry..
and on and on and on..

how about this..
Santa=Satan?????

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH…
are you stupid?

omg—did you find big foot too????

LOSER FREAKS~
HAHAHAHAHAHA

SANTA-SATAN….OHHHHHHHHHHHHHH~

Something about swearing to protect the constitution against ALL enemies, foreign and domestic.  Nobody is exempt.  If you take your rump to Yemen and engage in terrorist activity, you do so at your own peril. 

It’s damn sure his fault they’re in Afghanistan.  Contortionist Libs trying to make this washrag into a commander-in-chief break me up!  Of course, I’ll give you, he has killed more folks than any other Nobel Prize winner.

Cannot wait for the debates.  I shall have my popcorn ready for that….

Actually, GOP Congress sucks at economics.  They apply economics by studying history….

He blasted those cats with a shot gun.  Go ahead Mr. President!

Is that a question?  If not, why the question mark?  If it’s a question you were trying to ask that answer is easy.  The people with whom I drink tea were quite happy Mr. Obama continued President Bush’s practices…in fact, increased them…and the SEALs got bin Laden.  And you’ve got us confused with Anderson Cooper, CaptPooP, we’re the ones who kicked the crap outta the Libs last November election

From the ultra right-wing Huffington Post in March of this year:  WASHINGTON — There is no consensus about what good has been achieved in the two-plus years that President Barack Obama has waged war in Afghanistan. But one negative result is indisputable: the war has grown deadlier for Afghan civilians.
Newly released data on civilian casualties compiled by the U.S.-led NATO forces confirm what the UN reported on Wednesday: That even as Obama has doubled the number of U.S. troops in the country, the insurgency has only gotten more brutal and life for ordinary Afghans has become more perilous.           Oh yeah we’ll give Mr. Obama all the credit he deserves.

Imagine a Palin/Obama debate.  Seriously, think about that one for a sec.  She would simply refuse to answer the questions and just say American uh ey things. Just like she did with Biden.

So if Obama got Bin Laden, Bush killed 4500 soldiers. 

I say yup….this is what happendend.

Aww, sounds like Mousey is getting angry.   Use your big boy words Mousey – you can do it…lol.

Oh yeah, well except for 9/11, he kept us safe! 

:)

how do you appease terrorists???  You do appease nation states.  Once again Obama proves hes lost and clueless. 

Ok, sweetie, I’ll try really hard to explain this, ok? I doubt it will do any good, but I’ll give it a shot.

When you lose your birth certificate and you have to get a new one, you call the state. Here is what doesn’t happen: The state does not go to the hospital in which you were born and root through the filing cabinets. They do not sent you the original copy. What they do is check their computer records, see that you were in fact born, and then print out that information on an official piece of stationary. This is a birth certificate. If you order a birth certificate from your state office, you will not get the original copy. You will in fact get a birth certificate that looks very much like the one Obama released. (Modern fonts, new paper stock, etc.)

I know in my heart of hearts that you understand this. I think the problem is that you desperately want the birth certificate thing to be true. But wanting something to be true does not make it true. Pat Robertson wants the earth to be 6000 years old, but it is not. You want Obama to be a Kenyan, but he is not. Please let it go.

unlike the others there mothers didn’t just travel outside the United States right before they were born. ;)

Oh yes warrior Obama took 18 months to make a decision on Osama – even then he did not want to move forward – he did not have the stomach for it – now it appears that much of what was reported did not happen as Obama said – the picture of Obama, Biden and Hillary Clinton tell it all – Obama was trying to get under his chair.

Osama was in Pakistan before the first bombs was dropped. It took Bush 3 months to get his ass moving.

‘Ask Osama Bin Laden Whether I Engage In Appeasement’

Show of hands:  How many formerly anti-war progressives have put this quote on an audio loop so they can listen to it while they furiously masturbate?

There you libs go with the violence!  We all may need a Navy CORPSEMAN!!  lol  Clue:  Mr. Obama can’t bring the TOTUS with him to the debate.  He may not even know which of the 57 states he in, then.  But we will.  Same state as he’s always in: Oblivion.

Republicans think he’s an appeaser.  Once again you’re lost.  

Oh..and you have the travel records for all 43 Presidential mothers to reproduce for us here online?

–Cobra

What, pray tell us all, is a “Corportations?” 

… and if you keep on reading:

[...]

“That’s more or less in line with the U.N. data, which showed a 15 percent increase during that same period — after a 14 percent increase between 2008 and 2009.
The scale of the two databases is not identical. Critics have long accused U.S. military officials of undercounting civilian casualties, particularly those they cause. The military data show that 2,537 civilians were killed and 5,594 were wounded over the past two years, attributing 88 percent of those casualties to insurgents.
The U.N. report, by contrast, finds twice as many casualties overall, and it attributes nearly three times as many to pro-government forces. For instance, according to Science correspondent John Bohannon, the military database doesn’t include hundreds of deaths by airstrikes that the U.N. counted.
Nevertheless, both sets of data indicate that there was a spike in civilian casualties in 2010. Both reports find that the spike was the result of a stepped-up anti-government insurgency, not NATO action. And both conclude the U.S.-led forces were actually responsible for fewer casualties in 2010 than the prior year, despite the dramatically increased tempo of their operations.”

http://tinyurl.com/4sr9oxg 

Oh, now I get it.  “Corporations are people, my friend” you meant.  Yes, they are!

So your claim is that NO weapons moved under Operation Wide Receiver went unaccounted for?

”

Seems the confidential nature of the investigation was no better run than the rest of the operation.”

http://www.theoutdoorwire.com/features/224570

Shall we dance some more on this, or do you want to go back to cheering for the dozens of dead terrorists the Obama Administration put down?

–Cobra

I did, of course.  I liked the part that reads: The scale of the two databases is not identical. Critics have long accused U.S. military officials of undercounting civilian casualties, particularly those they cause.                

Wait…you actually believe that Obama started the war in Afghanistan?

 –Cobra

There’s a difference in being anti-war and anti-unnecessary war.

–Cobra

This is in reply to Cobra’s post below since site won’t let me reply directly.  WAIT  do you actually believe I believe that? No, Mr. Obama didn’t start the war in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan…Obama’s just killed many fold more Afghan civilians in his 3 years than President Bush did in 7.  But you knew that, didn’t you?

That’s great!

Keep on going … you’ll eventually stumble over the important bits :-)

I think you’re 100% correct.  So when Obama lost our newest top secret drone and then was presented 3 plans by our military/cia how to destroy it before it could get into Chinese or Russian hands and yet he did nothing, is that the anti-war war or the anti-unnecessary war war?

you are meaningless, again.

You knocked the angel off the Christmas tree, so that proves you hate the tree. Even though we can see you hugging it.

You’re like my son and have to be told something 2-3 times to get it.  As I’ve written, I did read it.  But I was able to discern the important part.  Did you miss “But one negative result is indisputable: the war has grown deadlier for Afghan civilians.”  HuffPo’s words….not mine.

What’s the most important criteria required for a war to qualify as “necessary” in your, er, “mind”, Mr. MacArthur Jr.?

I guess the most important one is whether the president who started it is gonna give you free medical marijuana from the taxpayer.

Used to get blood boiling in my head every time Limbaugh called him a ‘man child’

Hate to admit it, Rush is right

1) “[...] there was a spike in civilian casualties in 2010. Both reports find that the spike was the result of a stepped-up anti-government insurgency, not NATO action.”

2) ”
And both conclude the U.S.-led forces were actually responsible for fewer casualties in 2010 than the prior year, despite the dramatically increased tempo of their operations”
What’s your conclusion?

Thanks.

1) “[...] there was a spike in civilian casualties in 2010. Both reports find that the spike was the result of a stepped-up anti-government insurgency, not NATO action.”

2) ”
And both conclude the U.S.-led forces were actually responsible for fewer casualties in 2010 than the prior year, despite the dramatically increased tempo of their operations”

What’s your conclusion?Thanks.

This paper came from the Twlight Zone.  If you believe this crap I have a Iceberg in Fairbanks I’ll sell you. 

Wow this article really brought out the luns

Patriot why shouldn’t I call you a bald faced liar?

Candidate Obama on Hunting Bin Laden in Pakistan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFK0uqhe598&feature=related

–Cobra

he should have asked for his advice on the economy to

actually both:

“U.S. officials considered conducting a covert mission inside Iran to retrieve or destroy a stealth drone that crashed late last week, but ultimately concluded such a secret operation wasn’t worth the risk of provoking a more explosive clash with Tehran, a U.S. official said.

[...]

Under one plan, a team would be sent to retrieve the aircraft. U.S. officials considered both sending in a team of American commandos based in Afghanistan as well as using allied agents inside Iran to hunt down the downed aircraft.

Another option would have had a team sneak in to blow up the remaining pieces of the drone. A third option would have been to destroy the wreckage with an airstrike.

However, the officials worried that any option for retrieving or destroying the drone would have risked discovery by Iran”

more at Wallstreet Journal:
http://tinyurl.com/AntiWarIran 

Your assessment of President Bush must be ferocious.

I believe that Americans are tired of all the WARS and LIES.
Ron Paul has been speaking TRUTH to POWER for 35 years.
It is time for this Great Nation to Change Course!
Please do the right thing…
Vote for PEACE, LIBERTY and PROSPERITY.
Vote for RON PAUL 2012

Here you go Plutey. I hope it’s not too much over your head. Thanks for trying though.
http://www.loompanics.com/Articles/whycorporations.html       and one more just in case.
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/12/corporations-people-and-truth/ 
Have a nice day.

Nothing to lie about – Obama knew where he was for 18 months – he only moved due to an election coming up – he would not have done anything had it not been for an election – FACTS speak for themselves.

It is amazing how trolls can take over a thread and extinguish all other conversation. It is effectively self-censorship carried out via spectacular diversion.

;-)

I do not feel comfortable when the President of the United States bragging about the taking of a life. He was and enemy and the job had to be done but one does not have to revel in the man’s blood. This is equal to the Iranian  judge holding and playing with the bones of our boys that was killed in the failed hostage rescue attempt under Carter. 

He did his job now let it go. 

I love seeing OBAMO in a snooty, angry way. Look at that picture of him.

We’re getting to him, folks. He’s ready to Go Postal.

This will be put to bed in January. Professional law enforcement have been looking into the issue. The truth will be known and to discuss it as if one side or the other knows the truth is fruitless. 

We do know that he used a false social security card. This is a documented fact. 

We also know that he is a liar. This is a documented fact. 

We do know that under him the justice department supplied  guns to the drug cartels and then Holder lied and cover it up. CBS has documented that Holder is a liar. 

We do know that he funneled money to Nancy brother in law and other donors. 

What we do know is disgraceful for a President. 

He was right on that one. He saved thousands of lives by snuffing this guy.

Obama,

I’d prefer to ask the now, popular Muslim Brotherhood in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya.

What a stupid comment – just like he himself; manchild indeed.

You didn’t do anything you lying POS, the military did, scumbag.

Good one!  I love a sense of humor.

It was Panetta that was acting the proper role as CIC, Valerie Jarrett was trying to block it from happening and was interfering with the mission, Obama was leaning toward agreeing with her.  Panetta tricked them, planned the mission down to the point of the execution, got Hillary and Gates in on it and they confronted the bamster.  Mission Accomplished no thanks to Obama, per, the White House Insider.

Bringing the incident up to sidetrack the public on his Iran appeasement is a bridge way to far.  From the beginning of his term he has been appeasing Iran, first by allowing the Iranian thug government to slaughter the protesters without lifting a finger, their nuclear weapons progress, Ahmadinejad/Chavez tete a tete and weapons sharing.  All of it stinks of appeasement and wonder of wonders, Valerie Jarrett hails from Iran.

Coincidences, coincidences:

http://www.iranian.com/main/singlepage/2008/valerie-jarrett

http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/the-ulsterman-report-valerie-jarrett-and-the-muslim-brotherhood/

lillyluminatus, meet the Coalition of the Willing.  45 countries supported Operation Iraqi Freedom, 30 openly with boots on the ground, 15 behind the scenes. 

Tell us, which country has ever been prosecuted and found guilty by the International Court of Justice for engaging in an illegal Iraq war?

Apparently little lilly doesn’t believe the current unemployment rate as tauted by this administration.  So, she dodged the question allowing her to not admit the CIC to be a liar.  If he’s going to lie about the unemployment rate, even though anyone with a modicum of common sense can figure out, even what our own districts are suffering through, what else will he lie about?

Yeah… under the direction of the Commander in Chief. Good try though.

How else is he supposed to answer such a stupid question about appeasement?

Had he answered with the nuance of a professor, everyone would be bitching. had George Dubs said the same thing, it’d be a conservative circle jerk. Partisan hacks are just pissed that Obama was the one to clean up Bush’s mess and complete Bush’s failed missions.

President commands the military.

Herpadurp.

i knw, right?  What’s up with all these neocons becoming apologists for Bin Laden?

Seems like after Bush they either became hippies or pro- Al Qaeda… at least it sounds like it reading through this whole thread!

Dear conservatives (not the idiots, but the pro terrorist ones): I did a little dance when I found out Osama gox nix’d.

You mad, bros? Bin Laden got what he deserved. Good on the SEAL team and the President they served under.

Ask “The Cameleon”. According to him you can marry one.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPk4NTp-Lmk

Where in his speech did he say Mission Accomplished?  He did not, he was there to declare “major combat operations were over.”  Meaning, the big stuff such as the USS Abraham Lincoln got to go home.  We “aquired” real estate with which to launch our planes, helos & drones in Iraq.  He went on to tell the “American people” that we were then entering a phase of the war that would be difficult and long.  The banner the ignorant associate with President Bush was for the sailors aboard that ship for the outstanding mission they accomplished.  To this day there will be clods out there that choose to deny these sailors their day due to political hackery.  shame, shame!

Actually, it took less than a month for Operation Enduring Freedom to begin, Oct, 7, 2001.  With OBL, our intel services debated on where he was, the Generals decided they would rather not risk mass casualties of our troops in the early stages of the war on something they were not positive of….being, whether OBL was at Tora Bora or not.

If you don’t know that this had plenty of time to be written and rehearsed, I’ve got a bridge to sell you, any color, shape or size you want.

the GOP wingnuts are desperate to get “anything” on Obama….

More like under the direction of Petreaous and Panetta using the tools provided by the previous administration, the manchild has been trying to make par.

Chain.
Of.
Command.

I wouldn’t say that Bush forgot about Osama, he just stopped caring about him.

I mean, if we’re to believe the former President…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPTwsMEiI0g

Good thing we were able to move so many troops out of harm’s way and into Iraq, yeah?

Chief of the Boat.

the reporters response should have been, MR. PRESIDENT, EVEN A BROKEN CLOCK IS RIGHT TWICE A DAY

So you disagree with Republican demands for MORE troops in Afghanistan, and an open ended war beyond the 2014 withdrawal outline from Obama?

“75 percent of Republicans want more troops in Afghanistan. Case in point, Palin:
“Now is not the time for cold feet, second thoughts, or indecision – it
is the time to act as commander-in-chief and approve the troops so
clearly needed in Afghanistan.”
http://mydd.com/2009/10/8/more-troops-into-afghanistan

”
When it comes to the war that has dragged on for nearly a decade, John McCain has been one of the staunchest supporters of the man who defeated him.

But his tone was markedly different Wednesday as the GOP’s leading voice on military matters ripped President Obama’s plans to withdraw 33,000 troops
from Afghanistan by next summer, reversing the surge that the White
House launched earlier in Obama’s term. This, the Arizona Republican
said, was needlessly dangerous.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/06/22/afghanistan-war-causes-growing-isolationist-rift-in-gop.html

Really?

–Cobra

Uh-huh.  Do you have any evidence to support this claim?

–Cobra

Cobra – the US intelligence agency stated this days after he was killed – it is public knowledge – much of the same of Clinton turning down Bin Laden multiple times.

Read about it – Obama did not want to go forward – he wanted to hide.

You find it ok for the President to revel in a man’s blood. Obama did his job, he had his people track down a mass murder and eliminated him. To bathe in the man’s blood is beneath a President. Apparently you see nothing wrong with this. Did you pull wings off of grasshoppers when you were a kid?

________________________________
From: Disqus
To: without_hate@yahoo.com
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 12:31 AM
Subject: [mediaite] Re: President Obama: ‘Ask Osama Bin Laden Whether I Engage In Appeasement’

Disqus generic email template

Neal Boyd wrote, in response to without_hate:
How else is he supposed to answer such a stupid question about appeasement?
Had he answered with the nuance of a professor, everyone would be bitching. had George Dubs said the same thing, it’d be a conservative circle jerk. Partisan hacks are just pissed that Obama was the one to clean up Bush’s mess and complete Bush’s failed missions. Link to comment

The Race Card is all you
Fools have the brain capacity to use!  How Pathetic!  Now, get off your knees and your hands off Hussein pants zipper, son!

That’s one hell of an answer!

Like many Dims, Norm Dicks, Ranking Member Armed Services Comm. for one, are against more troops. And, I am too!!  With this CIC we shouldn’t be in ANY wars!

That’s not “evidence.”  There’s no such thing as the “US intelligence agency.”  Name the Agency–CIA, NSA, FBI…and give the attributed quotation to support your position. You obviously CANNOT, because you’re LYING.

“Prisoners in American custody told stories of a trusted courier. When
the Americans ran the man’s pseudonym past two top-level detainees — the
chief planner of the Sept. 11 attacks, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed; and Al Qaeda’s
operational chief, Abu Faraj al-Libi — the men claimed never to have
heard his name. That raised suspicions among interrogators that the two
detainees were lying and that the courier probably was an important
figure…

In February, Mr. Panetta called Vice Adm. William H. McRaven, commander of the Pentagon’s Joint Special Operations Command,
to C.I.A. headquarters in Langley, Va., to give him details about the
compound and to begin planning a military strike.
  
Admiral McRaven, a veteran of the covert world who had written a book on
American Special Operations, spent weeks working with the C.I.A. on the
operation, and came up with three options: a helicopter assault using
American commandos, a strike with B-2 bombers that would obliterate the
compound, or a joint raid with Pakistani intelligence operatives who
would be told about the mission hours before the launch…”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/03/world/asia/03intel.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

 What also complicated the matter was that Pakistanis were holding an American during the same period:

“The discussions about what to do took place as American relations with
Pakistan were severely strained over the arrest of Raymond A. Davis, the
C.I.A. contractor imprisoned for shooting two Pakistanis on a crowded
street in Lahore in January. Some of Mr. Obama’s top aides worried that
any military assault to capture or kill Bin Laden might provoke an angry
response from Pakistan’s government, and that Mr. Davis could end up
dead in his jail cell. Mr. Davis was ultimately released on March 16,
giving a freer hand to his colleagues.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/03/world/asia/03intel.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all 

 What happened 6 days later, after Davis’ release?

”

A helicopter assault emerged as the favored option. The Navy Seals team
that would hit the ground began holding dry runs at training facilities
on both American coasts, which were made up to resemble the compound.
But they were not told who their target might be until later.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/03/world/asia/03intel.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all 

  I am eternally happy that I voted for, and will vote again for the deliberate, thoughtful, Commander-in-Chief, President Barack Obama.

–Cobra

Right, because a reporter’s job is to be a hostile advocate for the opposition party at a Presidential press conference.

SMH.

–Cobra

This post are getting more popular these days so nice to know about this one. thanks for sharing and  we can get lot of information thought this site. Good luck…!!!

Good luck with that – look someone is hiding in the weeds.

…which began when dat no good white boy George Bush was president.

Aunty Unnecessary?? Do you have and Uncle Fester also?

Reality sucks for Conservatives. It really does.

–Cobra

David, actually, it is well-documented that President Barack Obama greatly increased the resources toward getting bin Laden over Bush levels.  Which is why President Obama was able to get Obama in a FRACTION of the time it took George Bush to NOT get him!  President Bush promised to get Obama and failed to do so over a period of SEVEN  long YEARS. Maybe it had something to do with Osama bin Laden’s BROTHER having bailed out one of Bush’s bad business situations with a loan! That is the God’s honest truth.  Enter (much smarter) President Obama who also promised to get Bin Laden and DID it!

Republican candidates have only joined the wide-spread criticism (which includes Democrats) of Obama’s handling of Israel and Palestine. The AP reporter conflates this with Obama’s excellent handling of al Qaeda to create an ignorant (bigoted even) question, saying Republicans take issue with his handling of middle east and Israel and allege appeasement. Media malpractice at its best. Does the reporter really expect us to consider the two issues as one, or is it more likely he couldn’t resist an attempt to set up his own 2012 presidential choice with a nice sound bite?

Bingo.  That was pricless.

Don’t forget your membership to the flat-earther society. I heard they jacked up the yearly membership  another $ 5.00.

Really?  So which previous President, since 1947, handled the Israeli-Palestine issue to the extent that there is “no longer a problem”, since there is still a “problem” today in 2011?

  Second…why is it the sole responsibility of the American President in general, regardless of who’s in office?

–Cobra

Ask Ahmadinejad, better question. Or Hu Jintao.

I think Obimbo personally hit him with his Nobel prize from the 8th or 9th hole. Move over Tiger!