lmao didn’t he just endorse Ron Paul?

Huh? Last I heard, he supported Ron Paul.

Supporting Newt Gingrich?

…Well that makes sense?!?

The Republican nominee better endorses Chuck Norris!

Or else …

I’ve always argued for patrick swayze. Ever seen Road House? He would of ripped this texas ranger punk ass’s…. well ass. R.I.P. who cares about Norris only gets money from advertising for different companys and endorsing jabba the hut,

Two bad actors. Fine

* In a debate with Newt Gingrich, the only issue up for debate is whether or not he’ll let you live.
* Newt Gingrich doesn’t make contracts with America anymore. America makes contracts with him.
* Newt Gingrich doesn’t spin in the post-debate spin room. Everyone else spins around him.
* Newt Gingrich doesn’t need your endorsement. You need his.
* Newt Gingrich once saw someone make a turn to the left while driving on the highway. The body was never identified.
* There is only one key demographic that matters in TV news ratings and his name is Newt Gingrich.
* In a Newt Gingrich interview, there are no “gotcha questions,” only suicide attempts.

He’s just pandering to his Walker Texas Ranger fan base… All 6 of them.

Humility?
Gingrich?
I would never put those two words in the same sentence.
Skeletons in the closet? That is an understatement.

the funny thing is conservatives have no sense of irony and don’t get the Norris jokes. They think “Walker” was actually a quality show.

Let’s shoot all of them and start over, enough of this.

Flip-flopper!

Chuck Norris supports Newt Gingrich because he is the only one strong enough to lift him.

“Skeletons in the closet?”

Nah I’d say they’re pretty much out and dancing now.  It’s like a Grateful Dead concert. 

* Newt Gingrich does not eat food, he inhales it. 

He’s a pussyhawk, like Grinch.

Chick Norris was vocally supporting Ron Paul but then found out that (unlike his endorsement of Huckabee in ’08) there are no perks that come with endorsing true liberty (no Faux News interviews, no hobnobbing with VIPs over cocktail… etc

In what I think was his first movie, Chuck Norris lost to Bruce Lee.

He, Norris, was called Cobra, and he fought to the death, even knowing that he would lose. He lost “with great honor,” which is something Newt will never be able to do.

Life has never been fair to Gingrich in Gingrich’s opinion.

Chuck Norris Wears Jester Pajamas !!

Most disturbing Mediaite photo since the Jason Jones nut image. Shiver.

There are entire web sites dedicated to Chuck Norris jokes, bottom line you don’t f**k around with Chuck Norris.. I like the annology to Newt Gingrich, Newt OWNED Juan Williams and John King in the last 2 debates, the leftys threw down the frayed race card with Juan, are they now going to throw down the bully card for what Newt did to John King? Are they willing to OUT the girlie man that is John King? Such a dilemma.

Gingrich is assembling a rogues gallery of endorsements by the nation’s nuttiest celebrities!

Do you think there will designer plates and trading cards?

I can see an oil painting on black felt hanging in my living room!
You go Newt!

you obviously no nothing about Chuck Norris.

go over the Netflicks and buy yourself a clue

he’s fought in just about every war there’s been

he’s a true patriot

and his endorsement means quite a bit to our nation

the only reason his Texas Walker Ranger show was canceled is because the libs control CBS

Official Chuck Norris page – http://www.facebook.com/officialchucknorrispage

how many pushups can Chuck Norris do???
all of them

We “Lefties” are happy to see Gingrich win now. He will be destroyed in the general election. He is like the Roman Emperors, thinking he is god-like and infallible. His ego and his appetite for power, money, and sex will be his undoing.

Chuck Has a lot of accomplishments other than Walker, but nothing that should make anyone care  who he likes for POTUS.

It was cancelled because ge’s a terrible actor, it was a terrible show and it didn’t have an audience. That’s the thing about the entertainment industry. As long as a show is making money the producers don’t care. Need I remind you a the show Full House? Your Lib conspiracy theory is just plain nuts.

He writes for the world net daily. That says it ALL. I am embarrassed for him. 

I don’t care for his politics but I loved him in Lone Wolf McQuade! One of the all time bad movies I love.

Ahaha, Chuck Norris became really popular now, but still I think he’s great!

Chuck Norris is a deadly weapon.

And that scares the skirts off you libs.

There exists a stark simplicity to all their answers & positions which is very appealing to the common mind of the rancid masses.  Idealogically ignorant & confused.

so what? By the way, Chuck, bad dye job in your commercials for whatever exercise equipment you are hawking.

Yeah….Janine Garofalo is ugly and knows more than him…..and Rosie is fatter and dumber.
They’re the ones to listen to.

To “Bob”, how nice of you to identify yourself as someone who needs to label people, and somehow able to read minds.  Do you know what I am thinking right now?  If your mom’s basement walls are blocking the signal, you could always call me at 1-800-STFU

I am sure Chuck will be labeled a racist before it’s all over.
Maybe Piers Morgan will ask him what he would do if a queer grabbed his crotch….LOL!!
(We all know the answer)

I am sure Chuck will be labeled a racist before it’s all over.
Maybe Piers Morgan will ask him what he would do if a queer grabbed his crotch….LOL!!
(We all know the answer)

Compared to the “transparent” past of Barry?  Let’s be sure to be fair to both eventual candidates running in November.

A television tough guy named Chuck

Whose endorsement made us say “What The #uck?”

Comes off like a punk bitch

When he supports Newt Gingrich…

His good sense has obviously run amok!

_____________________________

Charles Ulysses Feney

At least he doesn’t have to resort to making an anonymous comment on mediaite to make his point.  I think he might be embarrassed for you. That is, if you were anyone of any consequence, which you aren’t since you don’t even use your own name. Just like Barry/Barack, using aliases for some unknown reason.

Look, Norris had a career as an actor and he was successful.  He has a career as a writer/editorialist, and he is successful.  Liberals hate him for both jobs.  The common piece to this is that they hate anyone who is successful based on their own works.  There is that word “work” again.  Liberals are afraid of that one!

Sorry Burt, 
It is obvious from your posts that ANY criticism of your hero, Chuck Norris, really gets under your skin. (Oh, sorry about that Avatar)
Chuck  wouldn’t be embarrassed of me, he doesn’t even know me.  because I am no one of consequence. Just a person commenting on a wed-site.

Thanks,
Will Godbout

You are correct, Chuck Norris has had a very, very successful acting career! Made lots of money. But, most people would argue that writing an editorial column for a fringe website “world net daily” doesn’t not make him a SUCCESSFUL writer/editorialist.

When Chuck does pushups he pushes the world down….

Thanks,
Will Godbout

Chuck Noriss is an idot and I’d say it to his face. Here are the numbers when Democrats control congress.

Reagan (1981-1988)      14.8 million Jobs created when we had a manufacturing sector.Bush 41   (1989-1992)      3.4 millionJobs Clinton  (1993-2000)      23.4 millionJobs, raised taxes on wealthy and passed NAFTABush 43 (2001-2005)       1.7 millionJobs, results from NAFTA and tax breaks for the rich.Totals:  Democrats 23.4 in 8 years and Republicans 19.9 for 20 years, per the Bureau Of Labor Statistics, of free market politics and no results. Now you make the decision about Americas trade policies and tax polices.Bush created 1 million jobs by his third year in office and Obama has created 1.6 million jobs. When democrats control the Congress and presidency we will prosper, but when Republicans take powere. the 1% thrive, and we go into debt every time. When Reagan took office in 1980, the National Debt stood at about $1 trillion. Here’s what happened over the next 18 years:1980-88– Reagan total debt increase 3 trillion [300% -- 40% per year]1988-92– Bush 1 total debt increase 2 trillion [200%] — 50% per year]1992-2000– Clinton total debt increase 1.5 trillion — [150% -- 20% per year]2000-08– Bush 2 — total debt increase 4 trillion [400% -- 50% per year]

What a load that is. I love Chuck for his action flicks and admire the discipline and didication it takes to be a world class athelete. I even like and agree with a lot of the sentiment presented in Walker. Hell, I owned a total gym.

None of those things I admire about Norris make his poltical opinion 1 tiny speck more valuable and informed than mine or anyones. So he Supports Gingrich? BFD!  So what, and who cares other than the media and a few with celebrity fixation.

ain’t it the truth. And the template for Walker don’t you think?

i was about to say “it’s like a grateful dead concert”! lol

Exactly….an aging action movie star makes expresses his political opinion. Yawn and Shrug!

it was only so transparent cause he can out toke anyone. the rooms always full of smoke when it’s my main mayne Obama.

sorry maybe in chucks prime, but he’s too old to lift much anymore. 

or because we were so damn done with a show that has Texas in the title.

that’s why they are jokes. cause he can’t really do those things. 

how many men can Chuck Norris suck off?
All of them.

Chuck should go back to playing WoW.

Eighty-four ethics charges were filed against Speaker
Gingrich during his term, including claiming tax-exempt status for a college
course run for political purposes. However we say it, Mr. Gingrich is all about
the money(ask wife number three).  In a
recent story, “Gingrich was ask to return the estimated $1.6 million he
received for providing strategic advice to Freddie Mac, the quasi-government
agency (an agency that has lost millions) that guarantees home mortgages.
Gingrich has said he acted as a historian, not a lobbyist”.  A “historian”, is that the history of
greed?  He may just sell you a book on
it!

without a doubt ranger!

Most committed to the constitution = Ron Paul. The one who has polled better at beating Obama is Ron Paul, he would get more independent votes, if he were the Republican nominee he would get most of the republican votes and Ron Paul is supported more by the military and young voters.

the only irony i see is to describe Obama’s presidency as successful.