1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser
Advertisement

News Networks Grappling With Budget-Busting Costs Of International Coverage

» 7 comments

The huge resources required to cover the disaster in Japan, uprisings in Egypt and war in Libya have drained budgets at American news networks, according to an analysis by TheWrap. “We’ve already had a year’s worth of breaking news coverage, and it’s not even the end of March,” David Verdi, NBC News VP of worldwide newsgathering, told TheWrap.

Brent Lang and Dylan Stableford ran the numbers, adding up all the airfare to shuttle correspondents around the world, plus the costs of keeping them on scene and the satellite costs of getting their stories on television, and concluded a continued big news year could be a problem:

NBC spent $1.5 million on its first day covering the Japanese tsunami, according to one knowledgeable individual. That’s roughly the total amount it spent reporting on earthquake ravaged Haiti over a period of several months.

But that’s hardly the only international disaster crying out for coverage.

In the Middle East, networks are spending on the level of $2 million to cover each fresh political upheaval, according to an individual with knowledge of those budgets.

“The first day of a catastrophe the costs spike — you have to fly your crew and your anchors in, and broadcasting equipment. That’s a million-dollar hit right there,” Verdi told TheWrap.

TheWrap’s story has a cool graphic of various news coverage and burning dollars–but note to TheWrap’s graphics team: ABC’s Charlie Gibson retired about a year ago, and was replaced in the World News anchor chair by Diane Sawyer.

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • THE REAL ROYAL KING

    Indeed, much money could be saved by going to 100% commentary. If some news façade, some networks seem to be adept at having their “reporters” watch Al Jazeera, BBC or CNN International then “reporting” what they watched.

  • Thelonious Funk

    Luckily, opinions are free.

  • THE REAL ROYAL KING

    Thelonious Funk said:
    Luckily, opinions are free.

    And even at that price, often a poor value.

  • Rush Gingrich

    Maybe pay on-air personalities what they’re really worth, and put some money into “NEWS”

  • RoughAcres

    awww… poor giant media corporations, having to actually do JOURNALISM in their news programs… I’m sure their ratings and advertising dollars aren’t suffering. Unless they’re one of the giant media corporations that airs really, really awful ‘entertainment’ programming or misleading ‘news’; in which case, they deserve to lose money.

  • TfT

    Right – that is why the broadcast networks are spending a fortune to send their top level personality/celebrities off to England for the Royal wedding, because they busted their budget with breaking news. Makes sense.

    Huh?

  • BOMBSHELL

    OK morons, listen up!

    GBR (whom the family lovingly refers to as “Goober-Brained Retard) put our son, BOMBSHELL JR. on a bus to Thule, Greenland. He told our boy there would be a kitten waiting for him when he got to Greenland, and you know how our son is ALWAYS asking everyone he meets to buy him a kitten.

    Well, the kid is sort of dimwitted just like his ol’ man, and so I’m stepping in until we get him back to provide moral support for my ol’ man, and you’d danged well better NOT mess with me! Just know that I am GBR’s ol’ lady, and give me the respect I demand.

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram