A fat, unwashed, in the closet joke of a human being.

Never go full Breitbart

Breitbart must have been as drunk as he was in college when he blew through $23,000 inheritance on booze.

I can’t for the life of me figure out why any news organisation would give a man who is essentially a glorified internet troll the time of day. Is he really what people in the left wing media consider to be a moderate republican because he doesn’t consider homosexuality to be on the same level as man on dog? Are they that desperate to find quotable talking heads that aren’t employed full time by Fox news?

He gave OWS a dose of their own medicine.  Someone needs to stand up to the OWS slime.

Yeah, yelling “stop raping people” to people practicing their first amendment rights is really adding to the debate.

I’m just confused on how people fighting corporate greed would all be rapists? What does fighting against money being used to bribe congress, have to do with forcing people to have sex? I don’t see how these ideas correlate.

Can someone explain? Who at the OWS rally at CPAC has raped anyone? How can anyone support Breitbart? It’s like watching an insane person. lol.

No wonder this guy was a keynote speaker at Crazy-Pac!!!!!!! 

Where was Planned Parenthhod when this guy was born?????

 I know, would be so much nicer without the First Ammendment. God you republicans are stupid.

Yeah, yelling “racist ignorant teabaggers” to people practicing their first amendment rights is really adding to the debate.

I’m just confused on how people fighting out of control spending and debt would all be racists? 

Can you tell me why OWS feels that CPAC needs to be shut down? They were chanting “hey hey ho ho CPAC must go” and “racist, sexist, anti-gay; right wing bigots, go away.”

Paid astroturf OWSers marched on CPAC to disrupt and scream down the CPAC attendees. 

Does that add to the debate? Why are they even trying to shut CPAC down?

There have been numerous incidents of rape at OWS camps (so many that they have started to set up women only tents). Hundreds of arrests, some are rat infested, with streams of urine running through them, there are photos of people crapping on cop cars, using the parks as toilets, reports of racism, drug overdoses, and deaths.

Tea Party rallies have been, since day one, painted as a violent racist organization, dismissed as an organization only angered over a black president. Why? Because of a handful of racist signs 3 years ago… No violence. No arrests. No filth.

  Is THAT really an appropriate
word to use in this instance? The Radical Religious Right employs all sorts of unfortunate
rhetoric in their push toward establishing a theocracy in the U.S.
Before “Will” was sacked at this site, he had posts equating abortion to
the Jewish Holocaust! Such over-the-top nonsense only serves to exploit
a very dark, soulless era in world history for a brief, self-serving
moment, and that is the epitome of the boorishness commonly experienced
by adults discussing public policy in today’s society.

If the entire Left has the right to scream RACIST TEABAGGERS at the Tea Party (and now even the entire Right), for a handful of racist signs from 3 years ago, then it’s seems appropriate for Breitbart to tell OWSers to quit raping people, considering there have been many incidents of rape at OWS camps. 

Not to mention their chant of “racist, sexist, anti-gay; right wing bigots, go away.” at CPAC.

I wouldn’t want to be Andrews’ head this morning.

Tequila Sunrise
Take another shot of courage;

Then the right-wing words ‘ll come.
You just are dumb.

“and telling them what many people have written and said in the safety of their homes: that many Occupy “camps” have serious problems with sexual harassment and unreported rape, that it is often entirely unclear what they are protesting; that ambiguous protests are annoying; that their image is sometimes aesthetically unappealing.”

All the videos and reports I have seen about these problems have been written and filmed by reporters and bloggers at the OWS camps.

CPAC = Crazy People And Clowns

“ telling them what many people have written and said in the safety of their homes: that many Occupy “camps” have serious problems with sexual harassment and unreported rape, that it is often entirely unclear what they are protesting; that ambiguous protests are annoying; that their image is sometimes aesthetically unappealing”

LOL

Really?

You got all this from him shouting “you are animals and rapists!” over and over again?

I think you are giving his rhetorical skills in this instance a bit too much credit.  

Too bad you weren’t around to translate for us back when Dick Cheney was so fond of telling members of the senate to go f*&k themselves.  Your unpacking of that little rhetorical flourish would no doubt demonstrate it to be a cogent and well reasoned argument outlining in stark terms why the government must make no bid contracts in times of national crises.

Out killing black babies, of course!

Videos and reports? Have you ever been to an OWS camp or protest?

Like “hey, hey, ho, ho” is poetry? lol

Your party’s platform is racist, sexist, anti-gay, of course you’re going to get called those things.

The Tea Party promotes a platform that is against helping blacks/minorities/poor people in need, they want to reduce women’s rights, they don’t want gay marriage or gays in the military. Not only that, they want to give all the money to the rich, literally take from the middle class and give to the rich. The Tea Party/GOP debate audience cheered when they heard about people dying with healthcare…

On the other hand, OWS has never been about raping people EVER… where is that in the party platform? YOU ARE WHAT WE ARE CALLING YOU.. that’s the difference, and Breitbart looks insane because he’s just like you and so blind to his own side he doesn’t realize he’s lost it completely.

If you aren’t racist, sexist, homophobic.. stop supporting legislation that supports those warped ideals. Then maybe you won’t be called the very thing you’re acting like.

no, but I have read reports and videos written and filmed by people who were AT the OWS camps, not reporting “from the safety of their homes”, as Francis wrote. See the difference?

Indeed.

Not 45 minutes ago Snowspot said :

I think both sides generalize about their opponent… liberals calling Republicans all racist hicks, and Republicans calling all Liberals hippies on welfare.

Over generalize much ?
OW8, I guess you do.

I don’t know.  I don’t think anyone comes off well in this particular exchange. So arguing that either Breitbart or these particular protesters have the higher moral ground in this instance is kind of an exercise in futility.  They are all acting like idiots.

These are not the sorts of political exchanges we should have in this country, I think.  They accomplish nothing other than just making each side even more hateful and angry towards the other.

I don’t understand the interest in the Tea Party by radical rightists like you or by moderates like me. They’re pretty much off the radar these days. The few rallies and covens they’re attending in this part of Texas these days are very poorly attended and attracting the sort of people who clog the aisles of WalMart late on Saturday afternoon looking for beef jerky, Slim Jims, squirt cheese and Mountain Dew.

 It is pretty lame. Sorta like Gary Glitters Rock n Roll Part 2 at ballgames.

“Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time”

The only time I have ever used the term “teabagger” is the time I used it to explain that the “members” first called themselves that. And, that may have actually been several times. I know many on the Left who do not use this term. Your broad label “Entire Left” is most certainly overly dramatic and inherently false.

You might as well have stopped with “no”. all else was superfluous.

Hey, weird, embarrassing drunk nights happen. Let’s move on.

Is this what Willard calls “Severely Conservative”?

Many of those signs attributed to the Tea Party were actually Lyndon LaRouche supporters infiltrating Tea Party events.  Lyndon LaRouche folks are extreme left wing socialist Democrats, they are the ones who had the Obama/Hitler signs at the events…  Not that it matters much as those who oppose the Tea Party are not interested in the truth behind the signs and are more than content to falsely paint the Tea Party as a racist organization, the left is only interested in truth when it serves their political purpose.  

OWS…oddballs, washouts and @#$heads!

planning its eugenics to wipe out those physically and mentally “unfit” to live among us

Margaret Sanger…Planned Parenthood founder and the female Adolph Hitler of the 20th century….

You know,when I watched this,I had a a completely, entirely different take on what I was seeing with my eyes than Frances does….that’s weird.
Then again,I’m not a Breitbart fan.

isn’t Brightfart quoting Hitler?  What a douche… without security (the police) Breitfart would have gotten his face stomped in. 

Why should that be appropriate, though?

Using a “what’s good for the goose” type strategy just pulls everyone down into the muck together.

If you find certain actions of some people on the “left” (whatever that is) despicable for whatever reason, then the best response is to instead rise above that sort of behavior and not act like them.  Similarly, if liberals find certain actions of some people on the “Right” (again, whatever that is–we throw around the terms “right” and “left” like they are unified identities, when in actuallity they are anything but) despicable than the same applies.

Again, by screaming invective at a crowd of people, who in turn just scream invective back, both Breitbart and these particular protesters just show themselves to be cut from exactly the same cloth.  They are all boorish idiotis who are hurting civility and poisoning discourse in this country–regardless of if they identify as “Right” “left” or anything in between.

Which isn’t to dismiss the roll of protest (which I think can be an important part the political health of a nation–whether it be OWS or Tea PArty), but I’m not talking about protest here.  I’m talking about the way that people talk to eachother.  When it comes to that I think that many on both the “left” and the “right” could stand to improve DRASTICALLY.

Yup and the violent, property destroying OWS ..these are you model citizens. Time for you wacko libs to go home.. the country has turned against you and your 1% BS.  

And those rapes Andrew was ranting about… they did occur.. ask the woman at OWS NYC!!

 i think it was only once that Dick Cheney told one member of the senate to go f*** himself, so it seems weird that you phrased that as if it were a common occurrence. were you not aware that it was a once time occurrence and it happened because this very rude, disrespectful Dem got up in the man’s face and confronted him as if they were thugs on a street corner? Cheney isnt a wimp or a ‘sensitive man.’ when confronted in such a manner, he doesnt hold his tongue. good for him. we’ve seen what wimpy, limp-wristed Democrats do when they have power… they ruin nations.

cherish andrew like an old west show. he is the last of a dying breed of right wing,homophobic,racist fools!!!! we should show empathy for his type as an example of the perils of inbreeding! 

I like how Frances describes “a somewhat bewildered crowd” as if they were just walking by and minding their own business and suddenly for no reason someone started yelling at them.  They are there to intentionally disrupt CPAC with their moldy little OWS tactics. Many are paid fat slob union hacks and ACORN activists who were bussed in and have no clue who is inside except that they be rich white folk.

Breitbart was right.
A bunch of filthy animals and freaks.

The Conservative platform is no more for racism, sexism or bigotry than the OWS platform is for rape. 
And the Tea Party platform isn’t any of the things you listed.

Perhaps if you quit posting those kinds of hysterical falsehoods, which do nothing but shut down debate, you would actually learn what Conservatives believe, and stand for.

“YOU ARE WHAT WE ARE CALLING YOU.”

Well, then I guess Breitbart was right, and OWSers are a bunch of filthy, violent, rat infested rapists and drug addicts…

(my original reply got sucked into moderation because of an URL)

 You’re right about one thing, Matthew; he probably would have got his face stomped in. The reason being, the OWS crowd are sub-human, oppressive, disrespectful and out of control. They’ve been on the liberal plantation so long that they’ve forgotten how to behave as respectful human beings. They would [and have] lost any ability to maintain decency and self-control. Society needs to be protected from them.

It is a little of the “they started it!” here, but when you have over one hundred people, PAID organized protesters, marching on a conference, chanting ”hey hey ho ho CPAC must go” and “racist, sexist, anti-gay; right wing bigots, go away.” you’ve lost any claim to a moral high ground or indignation.

Oh, I know. I have it all well documented. I concede the point there were a handful of racially insensitive signs in the very beginning, but the majority of the ones the Left deemed racist were virtually identical to ones we saw during the Bush years. No way did any of those warrant the three year long *they’re racists!* war we have seen. Not to mention the lies about spitgate, and the n-words. 

Let’s try again. I know sometimes it takes a while for things to sink in.

no, but I have read reports and videos written and filmed by people who were AT the OWS camps, not reporting “from the safety of their homes”, as Francis wrote. See the difference? 

Comparing anyone to Hilter is just plain wrong!

there is nothing about Breitbart that is racist or homophobic. Don’t suppose you have any proof to back up your fibs?

Rapes happen in every community including at the OWS community. This is not a partisan issue. Republican don’t rape people? Give me break.

The Tea Party and or GOP, support racist,sexist,homophobic legislation, so it’s not really generalizing.. plus, I didn’t call them hicks, and I don’t think every person is racist, homophobic, or sexist…

but if you support the people that are passing that kind of legislation, you’re really just as bad as them… and you accept their racism/sexism/homophobia/biggotry.

So sorry for lumping you with the people on your team, lol.

All this video shows is some nut lurking behind a bush come out screaming insanely at a bunch of kids and daring them to take a swing at his protruding chin, until he’s dragged away by the police, still screaming wildly and hoping to provoke somethin’. (And right there at the end, his body posture almost looks like he’s been placed in a straight jacket, adding to the overall “crazy man” effect.)

I’m sure this video makes him a hero to the CPACers inside, but out here in the real world, disgraced conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart just comes off like he’s lost control of his faculties…

No,people need to stand up to the Wall Street slime!!!

I think there are many on the Right who are sick and tired of always rising above it. 

The OWCPAC group isn’t there to protest. They are there to disrupt. They were paid to be there, many didn’t know why they were even there. And they were chanting to shut down free speech and the freedom to assemble peacefully, and they were chanting “racist, sexist, anti-gay; right wing bigots, go away.”

So one guy went out and screamed back at them. Good for him. 

If you want to be treated with respect, treat others respectfully. Golden Rule. More people need to learn it.

Thank You Rita.You are so nice.
XXX OOO

Shirley Sherrod

Cheney should rot in hell.

radical rightist? looky that, more name calling for attention. 

…”sub-human”?  How very “super-human” of you.

Rapes happen in every community including at the OWS community.

So it’s cool then ? Things happen ? Boys will be boys ?
You obviously don’t get it 12voltman1 , which makes YOU part of the problem.

Yeah, I was aware he only said it once.

I wasn’t bringing it up to score points against conservatives, though, or raise the specter of “evil Dick Cheney” or anything.  I just thought Martel’s elaborate unpacking of Breitbart’s statements to be a bit silly.  She seemed to be stretching to give them  way more credit ( in terms of content and delivery) than they deserve, so I was suggesting, in a tongue in cheek fashion, that she would make a similarly elaborate reading of Cheney’s “F&ck yourself” as being an example of an argument that contains actual rhetorical content and weight.

Obviously, I don’t think she actually would (or I hope she wouldn’t anyway, lol).  I only mention the “go F$%k Yourself” because it’s the most hyperbolic example of contentless  ”political rhetoric” that I could think of–so the suggestion that anyone could see it as an actual argument with real rhetorical content was meant to be deliberately absurd/humorous (see: satire). 

Of course, a joke isn’t really funny if you have to explain it in elaborate detail, so I guess I fail as a comedian.  But yeah, the point I was making had nothing to do with Cheney.

Society needs to be protected from Wall Street!

And yet, Susan, it’s disgraced conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart who’s being restrained and forcibly led away by the police… 

There’s a lesson in that somewhere, I think… 

That not the point I was trying to make.
You are trying to make rape a partisan issue. It is not!
Rape is not cool under any condition or maybe you don’t understand that?

So, posting a video of her, in her own exact words, where she describes her own actions, and her come to Jesus realization that her racist actions were wrong, makes Breitbart a racist?

FAIL, try again. 

You have to watch the trailer called *Hating Breitbart*. it has it’s own web site. Go view. Can’t wait to see the flick!

Your summary is incomplete, either by mistake or the same devious intent that animates Big Drew’s efforts.

Ummm…I just generally read this blog and only occasionally comment so you wouldn’t really know me or me beliefs.

Thanks though. For confirming that you do, infact overgeneralize , and are prone to overblown fits of histrionics born of your own imagination and fears.

That’s why they chant in rhythm with admirable discipline, seem to be getting along in complete harmony with each other, and use their strongest weapon — shame — to subdue a shrieking crazy man.

Because they’re subhuman.

Do you even read what you right before you post it?

Having some loon leap out of the bushes would bewilder anyone, at least for a moment or two.

“Bunch of kids”???  You’re delusional if you think a bunch of paid union thugs can be described as “kids”.

 Stop talking about Micheal Moore that way.

Breitbart- a true American hero!

 Society needs to be protected from losers like OWS and you.

right! Yeah, a real dose of their own medicine there David. I guess that’s the issue right there, somehow in your twisted minds, AB rambling something about “stop raping people” over and over is comparable to young people exercising their 1st amendment rights. I bet you really do think its the same thing, that’s the sad part. You guys have been so mind f’d you really believe this crap, and applaud some angry, fat, gruff, white man for spewing hatred . SAD!

disgraced? haha 
not so.

he’s being led away to protect him from the ~150 hired people, and union members, posing as OWSers.

KIds? There have been over 6000 arrests of those miscreant OWSers.

Tell “the kids” to stop raping people.

The obscenely edited video was crafted and released along with associated commentary by Breitbart and his little friends explicitly to convey the impression that she was announcing her hate of white people when she was actually sharing a moment of personal growth.

For deliberately twisting an attempt to increase racial harmony into a bogus representation of racial hatred, Breitbart is despicable.

Breitbart is a peddler of blatant propaganda and lies, as you well know. Your support of him leads people to make assumptions about your moral fitness.

Obviously you don’t “get it.” The point here is over the last 30 years 1% of the populations income has grown 240% while the rest of the 99%’s income has remained flat. This has occurred because these people have rigged the system. Took laws off the books to protect everyone. They stopped paying taxes. The real problem is, idiots like yourself are ‘OK” with this. Well OWS and the rest of the informed people in this country have had enough. OWS has the ability to get out and make a statement in the streets because the loudmouth louts like your hero Dullbart (there is nothing bright about him) get all the media attention.

Why does all the ignorance roll to the right side of the table? It must be someing inherent. Hmmmm.

Look out! I’ll sic Margaret Sanger on you!

 You obviously want to join OWS so you can participate in the “rape” culture it engenders.

Have we met,dipshit?

nope, don’t think so. you are more than welcome to clear up any confusion you think I have, though. 

Sherrod was wronged when her employers fired her. Breitbart didn’t do anything wrong. 

She said those things, and she realized they were wrong, and he included the moment when she explained how she realized she had been wrong. The crowd she was speaking to, however, loved her story when she was explaining her racially motivated inaction.

The support is still massively incomplete in explaining how Breitbart is racist and homophobic.

As a  WOMAN, and a rape counsellor Mr.12voltman1, I am well aware of and fully understand the dangers that women face.
Careless and flipant statements that border on apology like yours do not help.
That makes you part of the problem.

“Radical Rightist” is a pinpoint on the ideological spectrum. It is not name calling, dear.

 They’re pretty much off the radar these days.”

That’s because they are now in the House and senate. BTW, OWS now has over 6000 arrests- talk about radicals.

And you’re delusional if you think OWS is made up of paid union thugs.

Of course, the entire point is that the T-Partee is as much social conservatism as it is anything else. In my opinio n, but just opinion here, even more so. Denying what the T-Partee is hardly serves as a justification of its validity, dear.

Obviously you don’t “get it.” The point here is over the last 30 years 1% of the populations income has grown 240% while the rest of the 99%’s income has remained flat. This has occurred because these people have rigged the system. Took laws off the books to protect everyone. They stopped paying taxes. The real problem is, idiots like yourself are ‘OK” with this. Well OWS and the rest of the informed people in this country have had enough. OWS has the ability to get out and make a statement in the streets because the loudmouth louts like your hero Dullbart (there is nothing bright about him) get attention.

The Radical Religious Right employs all sorts of unfortunate rhetoric”….

Did they tell the leftists to “go to hell” or say the liberals  wanted to hang people or did they urge urge people to “wipe those SOBs out” like the peaceful people on the left did?

A correction: In actual fact, the police shielded the crowd from Breitbart.

That’s been the value of OWS. Concerns about Wall Street needed to be vocalized. OWS started the dialogue.

Yelling is bad except when Occupiers do it.

You seem to have some unhealthy obsession with labor unions, to the point that you lie about them constantly.

What’s that about?

What makes you so stupid?

 You already have and your comments prove it.

 Why bring up that racist and her racist husband?

 I have seen your comments and you are a racist, bigot and hater and a massive loser.

“Limp-wristed”

You’ve got issues. You should deal with them elsewhere. Primal shriek therapy via online posting doesn’t seem to be working for you.

 Police have a new effective tool to use on OWSers: it’s called soap.

You lefties are an interesting bunch. You’ve come a long way from preaching how accepting and tolerant you are of everyone. Knew it was a lie then and you just continue to expose yourselves for the haters you really are. Not attractive. Carry on with your bong hits. 

Paragraph 1 contributed nothing and ought to have been omitted.

In Paragraph 2, you might as well have stopped with “no”. Everything else was superfluous.

What you are writing is certainly consistent with your radical rightist political views, but the value is even less than the FOX “News” reporter who gave reports of what was happening on the streets from his hotel balcony. As an expression of mere opinion by you, I have little problem with what you wrote even as I have little interest in it.

This from a slime monster.

WTF are you blithering on about?

Where’s the lie? Where’s the unhealthy obsession? 

Such strong evidence you needed only state the name, and everyone knows exactly what Blightphart thinks, says and does. Well done, my friend.

This is all leading to a civil war. Fortunately, we on the right do not suffer the pathological fear and hatred of firearms that the left does, so let the shooting begin. I cannot wait. I even bought a larger TV so I won’t miss any of the action. The put down of the left will be televised.

Reading is not your strength  I see.

Proof?

You must work on Wall Street.

 lol..total gut buster

I love it.  He’s trying to give those union-paid drones a more appropriate slogan to chant.

 patsy has no proof.

Yes, because we all know that CPACers are, on the whole, fans of multiculturalism; completely comfortable with men and women exploring new roles for themselves outside traditional male-dominated hierarchies; strongly in favor of marriage equality; committed centrists; and not at all bigoted (most of the posters on this thread not being representative of CPAC thought).

I guess you’re right, that was terribly unfair of the crowd to have chanted that.

Yup, good video.

Read much?  Those “protesters” were paid by the AFL-CIO yesterday to protest at CPAC.  

Occupiers were paid to protest CPAC
by College Fix Staff on February 10, 2012

The Conservative Political Action conference–a yearly gathering of conservative leaders, activists, and students–has been made a target of the Occupy movement, which is protesting the event. But according to The Daily Caller, labor unions are paying the occupiers to show up for the protest:

Protesters at Friday’s “Occupy CPAC” event, organized by
AFL-CIO and the Occupy DC movement, told The Daily Caller that they were paid “sixty bucks a head” to protest outside the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C.
One protester told TheDC that all the “Occupy” activists were being paid to protest, and that his union, Sheet Metal Workers Local 100, approached him about the money-making opportunity.

“I have nothing nice to say about Local 100. … They just told me ‘you wanna make sixty bucks? So c’mon,’” the protester said.
Other “Occupy CPAC” protesters were unwilling to speak on camera because they were unaware what they were protesting and what the CPAC event was about.”

No, YOU’RE a racist, sexist, anti-gay bigot. Yay, I win!

But see, already you instinctively place “the right” as being somehow better and more apt to “Rise above” in your response. Not that I blame you for this, as I have no doubt that many liberals would also try to claim that it’s actually the “left” that is more apt to “rise above.”  Which I personally think is kind of wrong headed as in my experience I really don’t think any side is better when it comes to this sort of thing.  Each has their share of idiots (and, again, I think the fact that there really are no “sides” at all–or at least in a neat an easy way–has a lot to do with this.  As a group liberals are individually just as diverse in their actions, beliefs, temperaments, as conservatives.  They don’t all act alike).

I think we are going to have to get past this childish “my team is better than your team!” attitude if we want to get anywhere, as not only does it destroy any chance at reasonable discourse, but it also is just kind of silly and futile because all it does is INEVITABLY turn everyone who adopts such an attitude into a hypocrite.

I can’t help but be amused when, for example, a conservative politician has a sex scandal (or any scandal, really) and liberals who take such a simplistic view of politics immediately gloat as if this is finally the evidence needed to prove that those conservatives (all of them) are terrible people.  Mainly because all you will have to do is wait a month or so and a “liberal” politician will have a sex scandal, and then the conservatives will gloat in a similar fashion, and so on and so on.

Personally, I try not to group people in terms of “liberal” or “conservative” when it comes to things like basic etiquette and personal demeanor, intelligence, etc, etc.  Just because the categories are ultimately kind of meaningless for judging such things.  I identify as politically liberal, for example, but I’ve known just as many dumb, a$$hole, liberals as I have known dumb, a$$hole conservatives, just as I’ve also known alot of  thoughtful people and everything in  between from both sides.

Which is all a very, very long winded way of just reiterating my original point that when I see this particular exchange between Breitbart and these individual OWS protestors, I don’t think the best way of characterizing it is as an exchange between “liberals” and “conservatives”–or “our team vs your team.”  I just see a bunch of intellectually and socially stunted individuals behaving in a very similar manner.  Breitbart and these particular protesters are just 2 sides of the exact same coin–the only difference is in the equally overly simplified and naive slogans they choose to shout.

 No, I just have a job unlike the OWSers.

 lol

Not only print stories and interviews but also TV news interviews with some of the “protesters” who had no idea what CPAC was about or why they were there other than the AFL-CIO paid them $60 to show up and follow instructions.   Google it.

LaRoucheists are extremists, plain and simple. They are rejected by all genuinely left-wing organizations and, of course, the Democratic Party.

They are to politics what Westboro Baptist Church is to religion: an abomination.

Please leave that poor dog alone. It won’t hunt.

I don’t doubt for a moment that they are capable of having crashed Tea Party gatherings to sabotage them, but no one that I’ve run across has confirmed that to be the case.

Well I have been and you don’t know what you’re talking about.

How dare those evil Republican fatcats exploit the fear of The Other?

”
The Tea Party promotes a platform that is against helping minorities, foreigners and the poor, they want to reduce women’s rights, they don’t want gay marriage or gays in the military. Not only that, they want to give all the money to the rich, literally take from the middle class and give to the rich”

Please explain…

Showing a clip of someone’s actual comments, including the portion where they explained they realized they were wrong, “is not obscenely edited”. It was a clip of her comments. 

Explain how that makes him racist, please? 

“Moderate.” You’re a pip!

Her radical rightist leaders have told her to think this, and she obeys.

reading comments from people like you, perhaps. 

Why can’t you control your anger?

You’re behaving like Breitbart. 

Unless & until there’s some evidence – some reliable objective measurement – that Occupy encourages rate, or at least facilitates it, on some level beyond that at which it occurs across American society, you can’t even rationally begin to use the accusation as a judgment about Occupy that has any meaning.  

I’ve thought a lot about this accusation, right from when I first saw, on a lede post to a thread at one of the leading winger blogs, a form of ‘prediction’ that it would happen, before any ever happened. I checked with other associated blogs. 

(For example, did you know that Hot Air is owned by Michele Malkin, & that Ace of Spades HQ & Verum Serum are connected as if by umbilical chord to each other, AND to Hot Air? It’s like all these iterations of the Gloves character that appear on THIS site. It’s deliberate, to give the impression of crowd sourcing, no different from what propagandists have done ever since newspapers started publishing letters to the editor.) 

I expect that at some time, maybe even this year, we’re going to see ‘published’ efforts to present incidents of violence said to be associated with Occupy events, including rape, presented ‘as’ objective. Such presentation would seem to be a natural extension of the meme. But there’s lots & lots of problems with such an exercise, including a huge initial flaw: the most logical, obvious place to look to for objective reporting on such phenomena is ‘official’ statistics, in this instance from the police. But, both by the nature of Occupy & by choice of police management political interests, police reports on this are inherently suspect because the police forces cannot be, & have not been, objective observers in Occupy events, but rather active players, or props, or both.  

It actually goes deeper than even that: we have to start with whether we have reliable objective evidence of the rate of commission of rape in society as a whole, in the first place, which itself could take up a lot of time & space discussing. Then we have to have some means to deal with the individuals & groups that have been acting in & around Occupy events who are not actually organic parts of those events, for whatever reasons (such as opportunism), determine what they’ve been responsible for or associated with, & then carve them out of the numbers.  

I don’t know that it can’t be done, because we have lots & lots of big population grouping events (sports watching crowds, Mardi Gras, New Years Eve, other political demonstrations), & there are ways to condition the stats from all these to at least arrive at roughly reliable at least indicative measures of how Occupy events differ from those. But the main difference that occurs right off the top of my pointy head is that, categorically, Occupy events aim to engage & disrupt social order, to gain the attention of society, which, again, turns the official arms of ordered society into players in those events, rather than reliable objective observers.  

But we haven’t even yet seen EFFORTS at such measurements; & unless & until we do, raising them as you do here is also, just as much, a categorical tactic that confuses rather than illuminates. 

Footage of Occupy camps doesn’t count because it just doesn’t so shut up.

I love the end, *war*. 

OWS = Odious Wastes of Space

patsy has no proof.

Have you noticed, they never do!

When your Occupy camp needs a Rape-Free Zone, you might have a problem.

Religious leaders to Obama: “The president acted stupidly.”

 Next the OWSers will chant: “All we are saying, is give violence a chance.”

uh huh… sure. I’m sure none of those arrests were real, either. 

Well now we know what fat chicks in Italy “Think.”

We can only hope your absentee ballot is lost in the mail.

There are no paid union thugs in OWS except for the thugs who are paid by unions to be there.

All those words to say nothing.

On a different day perhaps. My time is almost completely occupied by tasks different than reasoning you out of a position you were never reasoned into. Cheers!

 I have little problem with what you wrote even as I have little interest in it. ~rrk
If you have such little interest, can you explain to me why you insist on commenting (irrelevantly, and off topic, mind you) on every single solitary thing I write? 

Thanks for the help.

As the father of two daughters. I feel I have a pretty good woman’s perspective on most issues because we are not only father & daughters but friends all well. I do not promote this type of horrid behavior by anyone! So don’t lay that shit on me!

Just because you are a rape counselor this does not give you the right to point your finger at anyone or any group of people.

BTW- You must suck at your job because you’re about as open minded as a Beagle driving (chasing) a rabbit.

FYI- And if you actually are a rape counselor you should at least be able to spell your work title correctly. The word “counselor” only has one L.

Righties hate OWS because they changed the entire debate in politics from austerity and the deficit to tax unfairness and job creation.  By doing so, the movement marginalized Mitt Romney and ensured the coming Obama landslide.  That has people like Breitbart on the verge of a total meltdown, which we are seeing here.

What’s disgusting is that this fool will still be given a prominent place on cable news next time he trumps up some edited hit piece.  Could you imagine if someone on the left like Markos went around trolling Tea Party rallies, screaming like a lunatic?  I’m sure Ms. Martel wouldn’t be vomiting out one of her patented, “look how fair I am”, “both sides do it” posts.

I know who I saw the crazy man yelling at in the video, and they were kids… The gal who actually shot the video is a college student and writer for CampusProgress…

There are union folks involved with OWS too, but in this video, it’s kids the man is fleckin’ spittle into the faces of, until being forcibly led away by the police…

Keep hawkin’ that meme, though… Some folks’ll be fool enough to buy it, regardless of what their eyes tell ‘em…

I’m not sure these exercises are futile. OWS was born out of intense frustration with a system that seems to be gamed for the guys at the top with everybody else hoping for crumbs to fall off the table.

In some ways, that frustration mirrors the Tea Party’s with what they apparently consider a system that is deaf to their wishes.

Admittedly, I’m simplifying (a lot) to make a point.

But the first amendment isn’t a convenience, it’s a necessity. And sometimes the usual channels (which we need to admit are controlled by the usual suspects) just aren’t good enough for deeply held and urgent beliefs.

Hence Tea Party rallies and OWS encampments.

OWS involved many thousands of people living rough for weeks and months. No one should be surprised (or was, I think) that there were incidents of antisocial behavior and unpleasant consequences from temporary accommodation where there was no infrastructure. That is, after all, one of the points OWS protestors are trying to make: business as usual is neither possible nor acceptable.

Being I’m a liberal and all, I tend to think of the Tea Party as a product of phony outrage, whipped up by political consultants among people suffering from a bad economy and looking for simple targets for their rage. I also disagree with just about every proposal for fixing our economic situation that’s come out of the Tea Party, because they strike me as wildly wrong in every particular and guaranteed to make things worse.

But that’s just me. And my opinion doesn’t make that rage go away.

What else happened on Bizarro World today?

BTW-youmust suck at your job because you’re about as open minded as

The word “counselor” only has one L.

You’re a child . Nothing more. Simple.

 Righties hate OWS because they changed the entire debate in politics
from austerity and the deficit to tax unfairness and job creation.”

Yes, the deficit surely is not an important issue is it, not now that Obama is running trillion + deficits a year and will run up as much debt in 4 years as bush did in 8.

And speaking about tax unfairness, Romney paid 14% in taxes while Obama’s friend and advisor  Jefferey Immelt’s multibillion dollar company, GE, paid no taxes.

is there an open bar at this cpac thing? cause breitbart looks like he should’ve been cut off hours ago.

You took a census survey did ya?

According to you OWS protestors are (I’m paraphrasing) “paid, fat, union, thugs.”

You say that, or something like it over and over and over and over and over. Hence obsession.

And, please try to be a little less ridiculous: yes, there are union members among the OWS protestors because a lot of union members have been laid off since the recession began to bite over three years ago, and many union members are acutely aware of the unhealthy influence of big money on our government.

But to characterize the whole movement as being paid union members is flatly untrue and just plain obnoxious.

I personally am convinced you know better and yet you still trot out the lies.

 As the father of two daughters”

Don’t let them go to a OWS protest- they might get raped.

I was an Independent who voted Democrat until 2008. I witnessed first hand the unhinged Liberals for 8 years under Bush. The vitriol, and hate, the anger. Then I witnessed it again from Dems, when I was a Hillary supporter, and was called racist from day one, simply for preferring her to Obama. And I have witnessed it every day since. Sure, there are loons on both sides of the aisle, but I have never experienced such hatred and close mindedness as I have as that coming from Liberals and Democrats. And the media makes it even worse. 

I side with the Right on certain things now, because it is what I am seeing, and experiencing and I can’t stand it. So many people who felt free to forward me their anti-Republican or Bush material under his 8 years now recoil in horror if someone speaks out against Obama. It’s a joke. The race card, for disagreeing with Obama, it’s a JOKE. It’s like Liberals conveniently forgot the atmosphere that existed for 8 years under Bush, and now it is all just racism, racism, racism. I know so many friends that are just pissed off and not going to take it anymore. 

I consider myself more socially liberal, but fiscally conservative, yet to hear people attack me on here… Just further proves to me why I don’t want to be associated with a “liberal” group like that. I do place the Right as more able and willing to rise above because it is what I see, first hand, in my own experience, every day.

 proof?

My Gibberish is a little rusty, I’ll admit. Can you translate into Blather and try again?

Planned Parenthood has killed way more people than Hitler so there really is no comparison, If he had used Sanger’s plan and had her patience you guys would be wearing his face on your t-shirts along with Che.

 More liberal hate.

The MSM and online media used LaRouch images of Obama as Hitler to smear the Tea Party as racist. repeatedly. The posters even say LaRouche on them, but it didn’t stop the media from blaming them on the Tea Party. It’s a fact. 

Don’t hold your breath…

 pos is a more accurate description of fake emperor

Whatever you say, Teddy.

Project much?

such liberal love. 

Not acceptable from a liberal or a conservative!

Schizophrenic liberal philosophy 101: Just because there were innumerable instances of sexual assault at OWS that doesn’t mean you should go around saying OWS “rapes” people! No fair!

But one guy showing up at a tea party rally with a goofy “Obama as witch doctor” sign is justification for me to go through the rest of my life automatically assuming that anyone who has political positions that are to the right of Mao is a “racist”.

According to you OWS protestors are (I’m paraphrasing) “paid, fat, union, thugs.”

And you accuse me of lying? 

I said the OWCPAC group were paid to be there. They were, and many didn’t even know why they were there. Google it.

 People also need to stand up to DC….Lobbyists, special interest groups, corrupt politicians in both parties etc.

The STOCK Act is one example of ineptness. Has this legislation really been designed to stop insider trading by congress? Or is it a ‘crumb’ thrown to the public to stop the outrage?

How many citizens know what the STOCK Act is? How many people follow our government all year long, instead of 2 months before an election?

On a different day perhaps. My time is almost completely occupied by tasks different than reasoning you out of a position you were never reasoned into. Cheers!
***
Uh huh. That’s what happens when you falsely claim someone is a racist or homophobe. You can’t back it up.

HA HA HA HA HA HA JHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

LOL!

If you don’t see the casualness with which you offer cover as wrong , then yes, you are part of the problem.

 We can’t forget George Bernard Shaw. On video ( You Tube) he explains the need for a “humane gas” for those in society who don’t “produce more than they consume.”

Mommy, make scary man stop !

I agree 100%.

Breibart – a true American Jackass !

He’s technically is losing it. These tweets he keeps retweeting don’t seem to not bother him as he pretends they don’t, he puts OWS as the face on these tweets

weren’t you banned for this type of crap, before? 

Some of these tweets are quite vile and vicious one must admit but not incommensurate with Brietbart vileness and viciousness

 Saying your comment got sucked into “moderation” is ironic. As if. In one paragraph you call someone else hysterical and in the next you launch into a nasty tirade. I would bet 20 bucks that you also constantly talk of the Constitution and about how great it is (and it is; we agree on that) and then in the next breath you support people who want to silence free speech. Breitbart’s actions in the above video are nothing more than a veiled attempt to use filthy language to demonize OWS in order to (A) intimidate them and (B) to dissuade others from joining. At one point early in OWS I thought the Tea party might join since both groups have common agendas: the elimination of the control of big banks on our aconomy and economic policy. What do you think End The Fed means? But I guess, as it turns out, the Tea Party is nothing more than a front for the GOP and could care less about monetary policy. It’s one thing not to join its quite another to actively oppose it. Again ironic. You’re now serving the group you say you hate.

Why do minorities need to be helped? Why can’t they help themselves? Is it because America is a racist country, even though it’s the only country in the world where immigrants of all colors can come here illegeally and be given free money, food, housing, education and medical care? And why is it that Asians do much better than latinos and blacks? Is it racism or differences in average intelligence between the races? And what happens if you go to Mexico illegally? 

Thank you for that thought provoking post.

The lefties brought their bongos, lol. 

Casualness? What are you talking about? The only thing I see is others who point their finger and insult others. Just like you are right now.

Nah…he’s just a bit misguided is all.

I think you know the answer to your own question fatso. Now why don’t you give it a rest-your moronic opinions are cluttering up the blog.

Go eat a cheesecake or something…LOL

He does that a lot.

LOL

Breitbart rocks!

Well, they must play dumb and blame Brietbart for those sites that didn’t most the entire video (as HE did).

Seventy-five percent of liberal outrage and liberal argumentation is predicated upon their playing dumb.

How is her spelling ?

…bottom.

The Emperor Wouldn’t Call Anyone Names !!
Half-Baked Alaskan !
Brisket !
Toolbooth !
O’Van Susteran !
Il Douchey !
O’Van Karlsen !

 Just like how the young faces at the CPAC are there on “scholarships,” including expenses and travel costs.

Paid is paid, and bussed in is bussed in.

Yes, it was you… Well, hopefully you will be banned again. 

As opposed to the OWS encampments that were full of homeless people? At least the Tea Party people can afford to shop and dont need free handouts because they have no job, home or money. 

Apparently Mediaite is not allowing links to be posted anymore… If you really interested there are videos on Youtube that document LaRouchhe people being expelled from Tea Party rallies or you can simply do an image search on google and you will see the Hitler signs with the LaRouche logos imprinted…  The press ran with the story that these were racist Tea Party supporters…

The truth is that Tea Party and the left are often diametrically opposed in how they see the solutions to the country’s problems…  Personally, I would characterize the  Tea Party movement as more of a libertarian movement than anything else, small government and free markets…  I really don’t think that they strongly advocate for the religious right although many 912ers will join and co-mingle with the Tea Party I am not sure that it can be said that their goals are the same.  

There is no need to paint the Tea Party as racist fascists any more than there is a need to promote progressives as pinko communist totalitarians…  I would think that neither description is any less fair than the other..  They are simply two different groups who have different views and philosophies.  Keynesian vs Von Mises..  there is no need to disparage each other the way that we do, in fact if you really consider who the Tea Party is and what they advocate for, they are hardly asking for government intervention on their behalf, which should suggest that they act more out of their principles than for their self interest, no matter that you may or may not agree with them.

So why are the tea partiers trying to kick out the minority immigrants who are getting this free money, food, housing, education and medical care?

Seriously?!
The occupy folks/Rapists don’t even have a rational viewpoint. All I’ve heard is “We’re the 99%” Yes that is very well thought out. Most can’t put 2 sentences together as they are drunk/high.
It’s not a movement, it’s made up of people,not hust out of work,but who have no desire to ever work.

What is wrong with you?

Well now. After reading through the comments, this went exactly about as well as anyone could have expected.

Roman: “Saying your comment got sucked into “moderation” is ironic. As if”

It’s not ironic, it’s fact. Mediaite moderates comments with urls now. I tried posting one, sans the w w w and it still got sucked up. I didn’t reply exactly the same way, because I lost my original comment. So… sorry. You’re wrong. 

“In one paragraph you call someone else hysterical and in the next you launch into a nasty tirade.”

It’s called *making a point*.

As for the rest of your comment, it’s quite *ironic* that you don’t realize the irony of your comments. The actions you accuse Breitbart of engaging in are the very ones that have been used against him, and Tea Partiers for three years.

He waddles a bit too. 

Her spelling is better than your is Lurker.
 
BTW- You and your conservative nut wing friends seem to like to attack others personally. So WTF is up with that?.I don’t attack unless provoked first.I rather discuss facts.
You are starting to provoke me.
.
What other user names or Id’s have you used here before? Just wondering because of the number of post on your profile (very few).

The righties would use bongos if they could figure out the instructions.

OMG you can’t make this stuff up, you really can’t. 

Last night, Breitbart walked outside the hotel hosting the conference to attempt a chat with irate Occupy protesters, demanding they “behave yourselves” and “stop raping people.”
(Yeah, a chat, that’s all he wanted to do. That’s how I always start a nice friendly chat with someone. I tell them to behave and stop raping people.)

While there is a great deal of yelling going on in this video, Breitbart sticks to a few main sentences: “behave yourselves,” “you are freaks and animals,” and “stop raping people.” Meanwhile, some of the protesters can be clearly heard launching profanity at him until someone starts a chant of “racist, sexist, anti-gay; right wing bigots, go away.” Finally, the police show up and shield Breitbart from the crowd.
(So he’s calling them freaks and rapists and they’re supposed to treat him with the utmost respect? Or any respect at all? I also didn’t see anybody attacking him when the police pushed him back. Pushing him back not quite the same as shielding him.)

Finally, this site has a video of the incident. So I checked it out thinking that maybe I’d at least see the attempting to “chat” part. Nope, starts with him screaming “behave yourselves” Also the police who pushed him back, not “shielded him” were there all along, they didn’t “finally show up”

OMG you can’t make this stuff up, you really can’t. 

Last night, Breitbart walked outside the hotel hosting the conference to attempt a chat with irate Occupy protesters, demanding they “behave yourselves” and “stop raping people.”
(Yeah, a chat, that’s all he wanted to do. That’s how I always start a nice friendly chat with someone. I tell them to behave and stop raping people.)

While there is a great deal of yelling going on in this video, Breitbart sticks to a few main sentences: “behave yourselves,” “you are freaks and animals,” and “stop raping people.” Meanwhile, some of the protesters can be clearly heard launching profanity at him until someone starts a chant of “racist, sexist, anti-gay; right wing bigots, go away.” Finally, the police show up and shield Breitbart from the crowd.
(So he’s calling them freaks and rapists and they’re supposed to treat him with the utmost respect? Or any respect at all? I also didn’t see anybody attacking him when the police pushed him back. Pushing him back not quite the same as shielding him.)

Finally, this site has a video of the incident. So I checked it out thinking that maybe I’d at least see the attempting to “chat” part. Nope, starts with him screaming “behave yourselves” Also the police who pushed him back, not “shielded him” were there all along, they didn’t “finally show up”

Why is the edit window half an inch high???

Alcoholic rage. 

I’ve come to see that it’s a predictable trait of socialists (democratic and otherwise), to innately despise and to be ashamed of the proletariat. 

That fact is just as relentlessly evident in their cynicism toward the individual prospects of “proles” as it is in their typical allusions to a tightly disciplined and actualized enlightened man.

You can see that in living color here in this elitist’s particular moniker and in his multitudinous class-based aspersions, just as floridly as you can see it in the old term “bourgeois”. 

I think democracies are going to have to eternally battle these totalitarians who wish nothing more than to harness the errant energies of  fat cats and ‘icky’ Walmart shoppers alike.

not unlike the 100% of Conservative outrage of always playing dumb….That is why they are so good at it, Britefart and Limpballs are 2 prime examples

 Maybe because those on the right are NOT “useful idiots?”

Low tollerance for fat morons. Sarah-fatty and Breifbart are fat birds of a feather.

Well, I exclude you in that summation, JeffyBovineKoldyChimeriGraham.

You obviously aren’t pretending, you actually are dumb… as a brick.

 Sara: I meant it was ironic in that you are not moderate. It was a bit subtle, my apologies. See how I did that? It’s called being polite. You can, in fact, make a point without yelling or throwing lies and falsehoods around. If you can’t see that saying the OWS protest movement is populated by  rapists and drug addicts is wrong then I don’t know what to say. Moreover, you say that TPers do it because it was done to them? I feel this is all part of your movement’s basic psyche: victims. Everytime I hear a tea partier speak they cry that they are being victimized: by Obama, by the media, by liberals, by everyone and anyone. The truth is this: far from being victimized your movement is in fact only the victim of being treated more fairly than it deserves. You guys are the ones who use intmidation, as evidenced in the video, as a tactic. You guys are the ones who call people nasty names. And yet you guys are the ones who get airtime in the media to a far greater degree than your naumbers call for.

The OWS movement is not just the people on the street; there are large numbers of people who are fed up with trickle down economics and sick of surviving off the crumbs the 1 percent swipe of the table. You should join. You are one of us whether you like it or not as I doubt you are part of the one percent and you are just as much entitled to your birthright as an American which is sharing in the wealth our country has. A fair deal for everyone. The days of the rich stealing all our resources and dividing thme amongst themselves is over. That is what is socialism. Socialism for the rich. It’s time for a return to capitalism and the allocation of resources in a market place that everyone has access to not just those with rich daddies. Also, I’d like to see one instance of a high-ranking member of someone who opposes the TP screaming and yelling slurs at a TP gathering. I’d like to see just one instance of anyone even saying anything nasty. Good luck with that. It doesn’t exist cause contrary to your thoughts the TP is nothing more than a front group for the GOP and the establisment masked in a grassroots flag. You are entirely funded by corporate money and there is nothing populist about the TOP.

Truth about you and your OWS thugs hurts doesn’t it?  You creeps will never make it into the dust bin of history, for there is nothing to sweep but the disgusting dregs of humanity.

Memo to fools, bombastic verbiage does not overcome a few words of truth.

Maybe because the ones who are here illegally are costing us trillions of dollars. 

 Lol.

its not a generalization if its true! dispute what she said! are you guys not homophobic? I am sure you want to think your not, but lets be honest here among friends, you guys cant stand “the gays”. and lets not get started on “the blacks”. right? according to one of the  guys running for president under your ticket, (NEWT)they have poor work ethic, no role models and are always waiting for hand outs.and what about the “illegals”, according to FOX they just come here to take our jobs, and chop peoples heads off at the border?  so, you can get off your high horse now, and start dealing with reality, And reality is, the GOP is a bunch of racist, homophobic whack jobs. 

I blew some Diet Coke with Lime out of my nose from laughing.

Maybe he was talking about the damage they did in Oakland, plus the Molotov cocktails they threw at Police and on and on.  Just saying.  The OWSers are scum. 

Amen, this little pip-squip mouth of puk is obviously itching for an old fashion ass whipping
and clearly he needs it badly

You’re welcome RRE.

There are some posters on this board who should never be taken seriously and the Bovine Queen in Italy is up there.

Jack not only do you stutter…you just flat lie.  Typical Leftist/Liberal/Loon.

@sanders_youth:disqus , I could care less what you are. Your posts do nothing to defend your position..From my point of view, you’re just evading the real point… defending the horrible actions of the people you support. How do you defend people at the GOP debates booing gay soldiers? Or cheering the deaths of those without healthcare.Like I said a few days ago, many GOP’ers seem enamored with nicknames and one-liners, thanks for proving my point with your nonsense, no-fact post. You didn’t disprove anyone.

What other user names or Id’s have you used here before? Just wondering because of the number of post on your profile (very few).

You’re a child . Nothing more. Simple.

Thanks though. For again  confirming that you do, infact overgeneralize , and are prone to overblown fits of histrionics born of your own imagination and fears

The real villians here are the personalities in the mainstream media who actively engage in downplaying, ignoring the sociopath behavior at these events.

Want proof?

Just ask yourself how NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN , AP & the NY Times would be reporting this story, and the amount of coverage they’d be giving it, if it were the Tea Party instead of OWS! 

Please follow the thread, those are not my words, I am asking the original poster to please explain their comment as I too disagree with what I see as pure vitriol.

“The OWSers are scum.” 

You’re the only scum I’ve seen around here lately :)

Saw his mom making out with an occupier.

Breitbart isn’t on “my” side.  He’s too political for me.  In that he thinks your political view inherently means you’re to be demonized.  Those people he was yelling at had nothing to do with that rape allegation.  Yet he uses it to demonize an entire group of people.  It’d be the same if a Tea Partier was an actual racist and the MSM used it to suggest ALL TEA PARTIERS were racist.  That would be wrong and stupid and so is this.  

That was awesome!  Andrew is crazy but in a good way! 

Europe is plagued with immigration problems like the US and they do offer financial help in some cases.  It’s easily checked (I just did so).  We are’nt the only ones.

I would offer up the URL if it were’nt for the “moderation” problem.  Why are all URL’s being moderated?

Roman: Sara: I meant it was ironic in that you are not moderate. It was a bit subtle, my apologies
Yes, sorry, didn’t get that at all, since I am a moderate, but was making a point, using the example/tactics that have been used against me and Conservatives for years. 

Roman: You can, in fact, make a point without yelling or throwing lies and falsehoods around.

I agree, and I think if you will read my comments, and then those who reply to me, you will see who is being polite, and who is replying with personal insults, and lies. I admit I sometimes get sucked down in the mire, and when insulted and attacked (there are 1 or 2 who tend to attack me constantly) reply rudely. I’m human. I can only take so many personal insults before I lash out.

Roman:  If you can’t see that saying the OWS protest movement is populated by  rapists and drug addicts is wrong then I don’t know what to say. 

If you can’t see that I am making a point that a handful of racially insensitive signs do not make an entire movement racist, either. Which was also the point Breitbart, I believe, was making. 

Roman: Moreover, you say that TPers do it because it was done to them? I feel this is all part of your movement’s basic psyche: victims. 

I said Breitbart was doing it, because it has been done to him. 

I am not a tea partier. It is not my movement. And if you can’t see that they have been unfairly smeared for three years, as “violent and racists” and the media coverage has been negative, and the OWS media coverage, in the beginning, was positive, I don’t know what to tell you. The media stopped covering OWS because they realized there was a lot of violence, arrests, drugs, etc.

The Tea Party was a grass roots movement. The inception is traceable, and I have many friends who were involved from the beginning. The Occupy Wall Street movement, however, is astroturf, and it’s inception has been traced as well. Sorry to tell you, but OWS is NOT grassroots.

“trumps up some edited hit piece”. Is Breitbart serving in the Obaaamaaa administration?

Having watched her full 45 min presentation to the NAACP from which that clip originated I still find it pretty disturbing in a number of ways….  One is that she did express a racial bias that did effect her work…  she gives a very compelling life history as to why this was the case…  but even so she shows herself to be effected in the discharge of her responsibilities…  in the end she goes out of her way to do more than the right thing..  the video does bring to question though if she was properly performing her job prior to her transformation.  

Let me ask you, I certainly do understand your animosity towards Breitbart, I don’t quite agree with your assessment, but, how would you describe Rev. Al Sharpton, is he any less honest of a broker than Breitbart?  He has been shown in many more cases to use less than complete facts or outright falsehoods to stir communities into racially motivated commotion, but yet many on the left still view him as an honest broker of information..  

So Breitbart is a democrat?

7.62 x 39mm – Stock up! And no, that’s not a Wall Street reference, brainiacs.

His intellect and temper are as short as his other attributes?

val smithCollapse
There are some posters on this board who should never be taken seriously and the Bovine Queen in Italy is up there.

val’s contribution to the thread: 
val smithLow tollerance for fat morons. Sarah-fatty and Breifbart are fat birds of a feather.val smithCollapseI think you know the answer to your own question fatso. Now why don’t you give it a rest-your moronic opinions are cluttering up the blog.Go eat a cheesecake or something…LOLval smithCollapseWell now we know what fat chicks in Italy “Think.”We can only hope your absentee ballot is lost in the mail.Yea…I think we can see who should be taken seriously here. 

So that’s where you hang out – with your dip shit crowd.

Spoken like a true racist.  Nobody brought up race until you decided to go there.  Another stereotype used by a “non-racist” conservative.

Well, I suppose in his case that he must go with what he hasn’t got.

What? Are you taking notes? Keeping a record are you?

Anything out your nose does Val justice.

Huh?

It claims to be a woman. She did this a couple of months ago. Just popped up and started calling me fat over and over again. I suspect however it is a 12 year old, rrk’s alter ego, or someone very, very, very sad. Never has anything to contribute to the site, except to call me fat. 

“Physically and mentally unfit”  You just described Breitbart perfectly!!!  Thank you! 

 Strong emotions do need release, but catharsis can lead to pointless chaos.  I’ve always found it wise to pick my battles.  We just watched two sides accomplish very little more than screaming and being merely visible.  I think both sides were feeding off  each others anger in a careless way.  Each side is going to have to be more discerning of how they channel their energy if they hope to ever get anywhere.

 Sara: I guess we will have to agree to disagree on the origins of both movements. Sorry to say you are a TPer when you’re not and I agree you are right with the TPers being unfairly called racist. They aren’t racist as a whole, at all. I don’t believe they are against Obama for his skin color they are against him for his beliefs. Oh, and I was never speaking of you personally but in general about the TP. You seem like a very nice person who can argue without being resorting to insults. I was referring to Mr. Brietbart.

it’s easy, when you see them over and over and over again.

So a woman at a protest gets raped and in your tiny little brain that speaks for the entire movement? Listen, you’re on the wrong side of history. Breitbart sounded like a blathering drunk and so do you.

Sorta like your sense of perspective.

How nice! Another personal attack from the right from a person (user name) that I am not familiar with. WTF are you?

…ahem, but that’s what the occupiers were doing; they were slandering the entire rightwing as bigots.

Truth? Yelling “behave yourself” and “stop raping people” just speaks to the incompetence of my counterparts more than anything. So you keep drinking Roger Ailes Kool Aid. Taste good? Yes that’s nice.

The righties would use bongos if they were effective. You’re just a stupid liberal who avoids all discussion about the violence and rapes at OWS, and thinks you’re clever by calling your political opponents stupid – especially when they clearly aren’t.

right… they changed the entire debate from one of logic, economics, and math… and turned it into one of socialist greed and envy.

As for people on the Left trolling tea parties… they do. I’ve seen it personally. Been there, done that. The fact that this is quite literally the first time you’ve seen this from the Right should make you think.

You speak the truth, keymosabbe.

really? The police had to remove one man as a threat to dozens? Wow, he is my hero!

Andrew Breitbart is such a pig molesting loser.  What an idiot.  Like with all republicans, the truth is not in this idiot asshole.   

Awesome how only he is allowed to ignore the police. Try that in NYC, Andy… you’ll leave in handcuffs.

“it is a 12 year old, rrk’s alter ego, or someone very, very, very sad.”

That’s all the same thing.

Typical lib; you think we seek your approval to believe the truth.

If you ever wanted to know what a drunk yeti looked like, well today’s your day! 

Wow, and you proved it. Liberal groupthink on display.

“bovine queen” lol

No biggy! Mister Provocateur protected by the police performs in front of the cameras.

The righties are busy working.

Unhinged extremist scum like Breitbart could drag the GOP down for a generation which is a good thing.

But enough about your afternoon.

In general, republicans have been responsible for diluting the bill, specifically Eric Cantor.  He would’nt support the acts IPC, or political intelligence provision, which basically would require those who deal in political information which would effect the stock market to register like lobbyists.  In theory, they could then be monitored.

You’re funny.

A lot of large cities have these disturbed street people like Andrew Breitbart shouting out randomly at buildings and passing cars.

I suppose Val would appeal to mo fokkers..

none of the rethuglickers will ever blow up about the trillions of
corporate kickbacks and welfare, to bush and cheneys haliburton. nor
with the righwing ever realize the fleecing of america by bushy from his
deregs of the banks by his crony banking buddys.  or the billions going
to bush’s pal chertoff for his gaterape TSA mega government agency. or
the billions spent on the for profit jail industry that is fed by the
DEA war on a plant…. you will never hear this from the rightwing
dolts.   god, gays and guns are all they know… 

Radical liberals like Fart has already dragged down the democrat party.

Tucker didn’t send you to CPAC?

 You are not Barry Hu.

 Unless they are just like Hitler.

 Without rape, all OWS has is TB and theft.  Pretty small repertoire.

 Yes, occasionally a lone Republican will rape someone, and then they are arrested, tried, and jailed.  When a Democrat rapes someone, they are excused as a victim, applauded for their sexual liberation, and given a taxpayer-funded rehab vacation.  And re-elected.

As Sarah-fatty proves-Plus sized people are ultra-sensitive-hence her identification with Breitbart fat head.  

No need to reprint all the garbage she spewed this morning from her oversized pie hole.

I think this blog has had quite enough of her near endless nonsense.

Roman - 

If we could still post links, I could show you the origins of the OWS movement. They are connected to SEIU, Acorn and Tides. It’s all been documented. 

I think I am actually quite nice. :O) A lot of my posts I make in a joking sarcastic way, but they most likely don’t come across that way. I do get pissy when people respond in a really ugly or personal way. (I can tell when I need to walk away!) I like to debate with people, because i think it is a great way to hear other sides, grow, etc. Unfortunately, don’t get too  much of that here… I try though. :O)

I was just watching CPAC, and they had a panel with a bunch of tea partiers, and I was like, “maybe I am a tea partier, after all….” I don’t like aligning myself with any group after the Dems pissed me off so badly, and I am kind of all over the map politically. but I will never, ever vote Democrat again. They lost me for ever. 

Anyhoo, thanks for the reply. See what happens when two people are civil? We can discuss!! Power to the people!! 

Buonanotte!

“Europe is plagued with immigration problems like the US ”
Yep, western europe and America being flooded with non-white illegals, no other countries are. But whites are the racists. 

OWS is all about rape.  They want what they want, when they want it, no matter how the person they are taking it from feels about it.
And the OWStards always parrot that “You’re on the wrong side of history”, as if being on the side of manufactured envy and sloth is somehow desirable.

Breitbart should stop hanging out with white nationalists, who were invited to be panel members at CPAC. 

 Those are called “Working people”.  Being a leftist parrot, you wouldn’t know that.

Some people consider him a war criminal.  Certainly, he dominated the president he “served”.  His last book raised a few eyebrows and some felt it was revisionist history.  At best, he’s controversial, at worst, he’s the closest thing we have to “Darth Vader”.

and wtf does stop raping people, mean?  that clown needs serious meds. and a dose of LSD.

Breitbart is making Glenn Beck seem sane. His mother needs to tell him to get back home before he gets himself hurt.    

I just feel sorry for Breitbart’s family when I see these bouts of public intoxication.

Breitbart puts the ‘loose’ in loose canon.

 Prove it!

I think they make it a millimeter smaller every day.  My bifocals, bifocals, need bifocals!

You are right, just “idiots”!

 And yes those that watch Fox are our most vulnerable citizens.  We take care of our dumb.

 Ha!  That is such an ignorant statement.  LOL@U!

 
Try reading a little about Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood.   Black babies were at the top of the list for extermination for her policies.

 The Nazis gleaned much information and tactics from early 20th Century eugenics by American Progressives like Margaret Sanger.  Educate yourself.

I anticipate his edited videos of the president, portraying him in a way that is sure to make Breibart’s fans foam at the mouth.

Classic misunderstanding of the movement using preconceived blanket statements. 

We’re pissed because we have been raped. The distribution of wealth in this country is disgusting. Wall Street is running our country. On both sides of the aisle pockets are being stuffed with special interest money. It’s a gross distortion of what our representative democracy was designed to be.

Take it easy 12voltman1, those of us who read your posts everyday knew exactly what you meant in your first post. This person is obviously a troll trying to get a rise out of you. And I doubt very seriously that she is any type of counselor at all, or she wouldn’t be making these idiotic posts.

Now, carry on.

Breitbart is nothing more than “Right Wing” scum.

I think Jesus would totally back Brightfart…  cause he came with such peace, love, and understanding :) 

Oh, gee, Timmy, maybe it’s because they’ve been harrassed, intimidated and discriminated against for hundreds of years. But I’m sure your little white butt had no problem as long as they were kept down on the farm.  Who gives a crp if you go to Mexico illegally. We are the United States of America. Surely even you can see how that’s a stupid question.

Screw you Andrew Breitbart. How dare you even use the word “rape” in such a frivolous manner.  If you want to know what it feels like to be raped, I’ll be happy to tell you. Pig.

Not possible. Illogical!

You need help. I suggest your local psychiatry center.

You are not being intellectually honest.

You are one messed up person.

If you go to Mexico illegally.?
A Gringo Honeymoon?

@sanders_youth:disqus You still haven’t explained how what I’ve said is wrong, you and the party you defend lose because of this. Republicans are in the party of racist policies, homophobic policies, and bigoted policies… doesn’t mean every Republican is racist, homophobic, bigoted, but when you hang out with people that support those things, people tend to associate you with them eventually.
I guess the worst part is that you act ignorant on purpose.. but I guess that’s sort of a positive quality in the Republican party.. since they nominate people like their current candidates. If you’re any measure of the ideological opponents democrats will have to face, Obama’s second term is looking brighter and brighter. :)Smugness does not replace Substance Republicans :)

Do you come to this site just to attack people personally that you don’t agree with or do you have a point to make or even a clue?

Cocaine is a hell of a drug…

Like Beckohead,Bill-O and Jabba the Rush?

I think some of them are already trippin’.

It’s too bad Occupy’s commitment to non violent protest didn’t lapse in this video. I would pay money to see this guy get the shit kicked out of him by a mob.

Richard Simmons appeals to mo Fokker.

BTW-you can’t kill someone until they are born.

As a woman who has been a victim of rape twice–in one case it was a Rohypnol/gang rape scenario–I’m so tired of all the ginned-up faux-trage about this supposed “Occupy rape problem”. Where were all of you self-righteous screechers when Occupy Boston joined KO Barstool to protest hideous, unapologetic rape culture last week, only to get mocked and groped by a bunch of bros? Or at the hundreds of internal discussions we’ve had at the various camps about sexism, patriarchy, violence and personal safety? I feel safer amongst the dedicated people of my local Occupy than I do at any of the bars or clubs around here.

You do realize that the driving force that kicked off the “rape meme” was Breitbart’s own BigGovernment, right? Amazing how he insinuates his lies into the mainstream again and again, despite having been proven a liar and manipulator on multiple occasions. Add a couple unconfirmed, unsourced sexual assault allegations to a murky list of Occupy “crimes”, circulate ad nauseum, and voila! Even the non-partisan now have a vague sense the Occupy rape epic epidemic must  be partially true.

Sexual assault is a very real problem. Everywhere. I know the trauma of rape all too well.  But Occupy isn’t even a tangential part of the problem.

hey Eric, next time think before you type.  I am a small business owner in Chicago, employee 6 people, pay a living wage and stand with OWS a couple hours a week. I understand I have to pay taxes to support a system that benefits my brother/sister and myself.  I’m not getting rich but I do pay my bills, take a vacation a couple times a year and am lucky enough to save a little for my retirement.  I am not envious, drunk or high.  Why I am standing with OWS is to promote evenly applied laws; to protest the rich writing laws to protect themselves.  

Yeah, and we are so lucky to have one in the White House too.  What a blessed country this is.

I liked this without thinking because I assumed it was sarcasm. Wow.

Oh Please…Like you really care about Black babies…racist lol

Which Occupy camp had a “Rape-Free Zone”? And (non-Breitbart) citation please?

Brietbart finally cracks! lol. What took so long? this man is a roach.

The Daily Caller is an openly biased right-wing mouthpiece. I personally know many of the Occupiers who are protesting CPAC. They know why they are protesting–we discussed it at length internally, and while I did not concur that CPAC was an apt target for Occupy’s energy, I understood why they felt otherwise. And they are definitely NOT getting paid!

Please provide an unbiased source for your rumors. I’m honestly curious what the small kernel of truth was that sprouted into this nonsense.

so then you think late term abortionists are murderers?  

That’s not what I heard. “Racist, sexist, anti-gay; right wing bigots, go away.” The chant clearly addresses the bigots. And there was at least one white nationalist speaking at CPAC.

The Occupiers weren’t screaming “BIGOT” at everybody. There are hours and hours of livestream footage showing CPAC attendees and protesters engaged in completely civil discourse. Why do you insist on making this MORE hateful??

Not saying they weren’t real. But many were unjustified. Those that were represent a small minority of the Occupy movement. But you wouldn’t know that if you never attended a OWS camp or protest.

“Stop raping women, that’s my job!”, says the court jester of right wing blogdom

 NO, he is a no mind like the average teabagger

Fools like you believe all sorts of rubbish. You wouldn’t know the truth if it bit you on the butt

You have low standards for heroes, but that’s consistent

So now it’s hateful little people are lecturing others for being hateful?

 So much for all that love. You guys are itching for a chance to blast someone, you fascist cretines

Intelligent people to Ted, You always act stupid

 Well genius, how are the morons & tools you salivate over going to do better with the deficit than Obama? They are all going to slash all taxes, especially for the rich that you gutless lackeys worship,  while at best pruning 5% off of the spending.

No one knows who is really tweeting those.  Just like those right wing scum with talk radio shows pay “liberal” callers to egg them on for effect

Sorry, but if people like you and Breitbart are smart, you don’t sound like it

 He is more like a rock, as in his head

You seem to be exhibiting the sociopathic behavior here.

 Your petty stupid common comments bring out the worst, but feel free to feel sorry for yourself

I like it as well.

So totally unbalanced he can’t appreciate the irony in his screaming at people to behave themselves

Discourse like this is why we’re struggling to make a name for themselves. I think both sides looked bad. Just a bunch of trolls.

This wasn’t really any sort of discourse, they were just trolling each other out of anger. Personally, I don’t think anyone should take this “conversation” seriously.

Well, of course.  Likely, as not, you wrote it.

Do you have a shriveled brained mouse in your pocket, or is just you and RRE heading up the light weight intellect department?

Of course, the fact that a few of the slackers and layabout losers in the OWS crowd admitted yesterday that they were paid $60 a day by a local union to picket the CPAC was left out of the article by Commissar Martel.   That would be journalism, a profession studiously avoided by more than a few Mediate writers.

Stop wearing your rapes as if it is a badge of honor and credibility.  In the context of a rape avoidance seminar such is fine.  But, using your misfortune to advance political dogma of the worst kind makes you a “demagogue,” by definition.

During early OWS childhood, it is quite possible that an anomaly occurred during the freudian anal/oral stage, resulting in a selfish demand for the tit.  Such is still manifest now, well into adulthood for these aberrants.  That you find you find their company more desirable and less threatening than the educated, groomed and polite people within CPAC, makes me question your credibility and your stories?

“Judge a man by the company he keeps”

Purveyor

Cool

 ”If you want a vision of the future, imagine an Occupier’s boot stamping on Andrew Breitbart’s corpulant, disease ridden face – forever.”- George Orwell

Awesome I wish George Soros would pay them better. Keep it up OWS, we are winning!

FYI there are no rules.

Truth about you and your right wing thugs more like.  Breitbart cannot keep his cool, and let his fellow citizens peacefully protest their differing point of view, without yelling abuse them – and nor can you.   You will never be the great man you think you are going to be.  You will not escape the self-same dustbin of history you fear so much.

For all you liberals who are attack Breitbart, he might not be politically correct but he’s damn right about those Occupy thugs.  Occupy people are garbage and they are directly responsible for the rape and death of the people they are responsible for.  If you support those people, you support anarchy and not peaceful protest.  Read your own personal liberal media reports.  Even the most rose cover crap stories they have, paint these clowns as nothing more then the garbage movement they are.  How many more small business and people’s lives do they have to destroy for you people to actually understand?  People in America have it easy by the worlds standard, yet you people don’t appreciate a damn thing about the freedom the constitution provides you.  Moving towards a government who gives you hand outs on everything will destroy you and what you stand for. 

“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the
government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of
taking care of them.”

Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson’s vision is being destroyed by people like them. 

 how many rapes were there among the hundreds of thousands of people at Beck’s rally in Washington? I’ll tell you: none.

“rapes happen”? tell us how blase you are about this when your mother, daughter, or girlfriend is raped, ok?

and just because you impregnated someone doesn’t make you a father.

judging by how clueless you are here, I’d bet you don’t know a thing about how your daughters really feel.

 what is “puk”? is it anything like “puke”?

idiots who can’t spell and don’t know grammar shouldn’t be calling other people names.

 28 likes for this? Standards are low around here

I wouldn’t give Sharpton the time of day. He’s a (mostly former) demagogue, now trying to cash in as an elder statesman. It doesn’t wash with me.

Breitbart is slime-entrepreneur. That doesn’t make him that much different than Sharpton in his earlier career, but it certainly doesn’t make him any better. Also, IMO, Breitbart is more than a little nuts, where Sharpton is more than a little sleazy.

Suffice it to say, I have no intention of — unlike Ayers and Dohrn — of inviting either one of them over for dinner next Superbowl.

Breitbart is in the same category as the protestors, if not worse.  He looks like an insane man yelling at the protesters, and it doesn’t do himself any favor when people see himself like that.  Breitbart really has no creditability as a journalist, and I don’t believe he should even try to pass himself out as one.  CPAC didn’t do themselves any favors by inviting him to speak at their convention.

“Well, then I guess Breitbart was right, and OWSers are a bunch of filthy, violent, rat infested rapists and drug addicts…” Nice to see you are being so reasonable and open minded, But not everyone can live up to your high standards

 oh little squirrel, did the world just begin with Obama for you too?

you obviously don’t know that among other things, Breitbart built Arianna Huffington’s website. so if you’re a huffpo fan, you have Breitbart to thank.

but for children like you, there is no history before 2008. no president has EVER been as wonderful as Obama and no one has EVER been as insulted by the American people, who just hate him because he’s black (after overwhelmingly voting for him, which is weird…).

the OWS (bowel) movement has been thoroughly discredited by mainstream America. this softball article doesn’t capture the disgust felt by most citizens as we watch these spoiled kids crapping in public and yes, raping, and stealing, and walking around announcing that they deserve whatever they want, just because they’re them. what utter bullshit. 

but I hope OWS carries on, because every time there’s another rape, or another cop is injured, or they throw condoms at more Catholic schoolchildren,  it reminds voters why they need to vote Republican.

Have you noticed how the police use disposable gloves these days when they handle whacked-out suspects? It’s basic hygiene, given that that a small scratch might expose you to a lethal, incurable disease (or two or three). Trust me, the cops try to use those gloves whenever they have to handle a streetcorner screamer like Breitbart.

Not to mention, it was a pretty fair guess (from the police’s point of view) that Breitbart was going to plow into the crowd, fists swinging wildly. If it were me, I’d have Tased the jerk.

What source did you get that information from.  I have a tendency to discount comments like yours when you don’t provide the source.  I’m not saying your wrong, but providing a source provides you with more creditability.

 you’re an idiot. I don’t usually go ad hominem, but your summary of what the tea party believes in is so laughably wrong that you have earned the word. actually, that’s a nicer word than you deserve.

you clearly know nothing about what the tea party stands for. I would bet you don’t know anyone who’s ever been to a tea party meeting. “TEA” stands for “taxed enough already”–but you don’t even LIST taxes on your silly list of Bad Thing Conservatives Want to Do to Everyone.

people like you don’t rely on facts to form your opinions, so it’s pointless to argue with you. don’t you have to go sexually assault someone at an OWS protest or something?

Fair enough…

Fat white guy, drunk in the park.

Breitbart has been proven to be honest.  You might not appreciate the way he goes about exposing hypocrisy, but please don’t even attempt to lump him in with the whacky, filthy protestors.  

I don’t think he’s too concerned about doing you and yours a favor.  Seriously, why a democrat would think that his opinion on either Palin, Breitbart or any other republican means diddly, I have not a clue.

Love the know it all attitude of the left.  lol

Should we tell you who to invite to your convention?  

I think you have it backwards.  The disease ridden face would be one of your awesome occupiers.  lol

That is probably exactly what Breitbart wanted to happen to give himself more attention.  They behaved themselves a lot better than he did which only serves to show Breitbarts lack of professionalism as a journalist, if you believe he is a journalist.

Do you think val might have a weight problem (among others)?

How, exactly, is walking out to a fairly well-behaved crowd of protesters who are exercising their First Amendment rights in a non-violent way and drunkenly screaming at them “an attempt to chat?”

He went outside to blow off some steam and get some YouTube time. The guy has an anger management problem and his peers don’t seem interested in doing anything to discourage it.

Of course you like it.  You like any classless, vile, clueless comment.  We already know your standards and have a clear picture of you and yours.  

Out of the mouth of one of the “occupiers”.  Credible enough for you?

What exactly are they winning?  What do you think their behavior and conduct has cost cities?  Who’s going to pay?  Where will you be dropping off your check?

Gosh, mind pointing me to where Breitbart raped anyone?  

Your vile attempt to be “profound” failed.  You’re a person with no moral compass and no filter.  You do not smear someone because you don’t like them.  If you have proof to back up your foul allegation, provide it, or clean up your comment.  It truly is time to grow up and accept responsibility for yourself.  

You should re-read your posts and then give your computer away.  You have yet to write one thoughtful, honest post.  Your modus operandi is “say vile stupid things” and you’ve more than accomplished that.

You have a weight problem.  That is obvious.  

Guess he could not make a drug score and got pissed.

Ah, so Breitbart did the bulk of the work to establish the Huffington post? Silly me, I thought it was the hundreds of unpaid writers that did the majority of the work that made it successful, turns out it was Breitbart working under dozens of pseudonyms, And no, I’m not a Huffington Post fan.

I do so love your patronising tone, it’s doing ever such a wonderful job of making me agree with you, I mean, I’m just a liberal squirrel. I can’t possibly have been aware of  politics before Obama, I don’t recall the Bush or Clinton years at all, nope, nor the one term of Bush Sr. :).

Seriously though, OWS has been discredited in much the way the entire right have. If you choose to only see the bad apples that may or may not exist and extrapolate to ridiculous extremes, declaring them to represent the whole of the movement, then sure… But that would mean it would be equally fair to claim that every republican is a racist secessionist bigot who like to preach family values while having affairs with their secretaries or male prostitutes, that murder abortion doctors while taking huge amount of money from corporate donors. It’s not.

I would never do that because I have a lick of common sense and I’m not completely blinded by partisan rage so I’m happy to admit there are a a lot of good people on the right, but Breitbart is not one of them. While I may not agree with people like Ron Paul and Buddy Roemer on the issues, I believe they’re good, decent human beings with the same strengths and failings as the rest of us. It’s a shame you choose to go with those who just want to smear those they disagree with in the most offensive ways they can think of, but it’s your life. :)

That’s my point.  Breitbart is doing exactly the same thing so he’s no better.  I did not like it when MSNBC started LYNCHING the Tea Party and I don’t like it when the warmongers attack Occupy.  Why must these movements be so demonized?  I don’t agree with probably 70% of the Occupy movement, but does that justify me demonizing them as rapists and pot smokers?  No.  

THERE’S A BETTER WAY FORWARD FOR OUR COUNTRY!

Some of my Ron Paul brethren have actually tried to reach out to Occupiers and found some common ground on bailing out banks and the Federal Reserve System, as well as ending the policing of the world.  We’ve looked at it like an educational opportunity to educate some people in a non-threatening way. It seems Breitbart see’s it as entirely fabricated (same thing MSNBC said about Tea Party) and dangerous.  Gee, that sounds familiar. Maybe he should work for MSNBC?

Yeah you people like to fain ignorance to the Occupy people’s history of destruction, violence, and total disrespectful treatment of the community they reside in do you?

What creditability problem does he have as a journalist?  Everything he’s released has been proved to be true.  Yeah, he’s blunt and he might be in it for fame also but at least he say what he wants and do what he wants.  That is the American way as I was taught since 7.  If more people are more honest with themselves on both side, we’d be a lot better off but no, the left are outspoken and people are used to it.  When the right does it, people attack them. 

I understand that when you feel weak and powerless, and the Conservatives clearly do, then yelling abuse at innocent people when your self-proclaimed role is to call out people on the other side for doing exactly the same thing, seems fair enough.  But it isn’t.  Andrew Breitbart, even if you feel the Liberal media is huge and you feel small and victimized, you still get held to the same standard.  Minorities will tell you that.  It’s about time Conservatives stopped demanding a free pass when it comes to their speech and behavior.

And you just made yourself even more of a buffoon for a comment that has no evidence, just like a lefty to do such a thing on anybody who is outspoken and conservative.

You are so wrong, the Conservatives are held in such higher standards then the liberal in the media circle.  Is Breitbart wrong for yelling like that? Yeah but it’s his right, he’s not working for MSNBC, CNN, FOX, ABC….etc.  If he were at any of those, he’d be fired in a heartbeat but if a liberal did that, he’ll be crown a hero.  Just like every MSNBC clowns you see attack conservative on T.V.

No, he’s not right about a damn thing, and neither are you. Both you and Breitbart are lying scum.

BTW, I’m not big on looking to a guy who owned and raped slaves as a source of moral authority.

No, the vast majority of what Breitbart puts out is proven to be false.

No, he’s not honest at all. He’s one of the most dishonest people in journalism.

Andrew Dimfart shows that he has no ideas, no point, and no brains.

 whats the matter Andrew? not getting enough face time with your idiotic videos?
what a loser.

Idiotic dishonest conservative philosophy 101: Lie if you can, tell the truth if you must, but always distort.

There have been no such “innumerable instances of sexual assault at OWS”. That’s pure fiction. The “Obama as witch doctor” and a variety of other flagrantly racist signs weren’t just “one guy” at a Tea Party rally. They were ubiquitous at Tea Party rallies.
http://img607.imageshack.us/img607/9290/wahoooo45954360337.jpg

Austerity and tax cuts are illogical in the extreme and have no basis in sound economics. And the GOP’s desperate attempt to paint the argument for fair taxation and job creation as “socialist greed and envy” is doomed to failure. You know it’s doomed, too, which is why you’re so infuriated at OWS’s success.

But rapes happen a hell of a lot more often among OWSers than tea partiers. I’ve never heard of anybody being raped a tea party event. Riot police are not needed at Tea Party events, and the participants don’t leave piles of garbage and human excrement behind. Assaults and thefts are not a problem when tea partiers get together, where the worst problem you’ll probably have will be someone with an “Is Atlas Shrugging?” sign being a little too eager about distributing his leaflets.

Why should anyone care about the OWSers’ ideas about managing the country when they can’t even manage their own encampments?

When has the Obama administration ever done anything along those lines? It’s the standard operating procedure of conservative “journalism”, though. Exhibit A: Fox News.

You’re a perfect example of a wingnut Occupy critic whose attention span is too short to even understand what you’re criticizing, so you just make crap up instead.

Occupy…   
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Wall-Street-patrol-car.jpg

It’s the Progressive species. 

No, the deficit really isn’t an important issue. We don’t want deficit reduction if it comes at the cost of higher unemployment. And it does come at that cost.

Except that the religious leaders are the ones who are acting stupidly.

Funny how it was always the Teabaggers who threatened “2nd Amendment solutions” if they didn’t get their way. And it’s the OWS protesters who are targeted for violence by the police.

It isn’t just one rape. There have been such assaults, and plenty of other problems, at OWS encampments all around the country.

How about you come out and participate if you’re so looking forward to it?

It’ll turn out that having more guns won’t help when your side is filled with fat slobs and chickenhawks.

Typical right-wing whine: “How dare you be intolerant of my racism!”

Ted26- a true American zero!

Just like Breitbart, actually!

What’s amazing isn’t that you guys still trot out this BS, but that there are people who believe it.

Eugenics was all the rage during Sanger’s days, but her passion was saving women’s lives, since so many were dying during their pregnancies, including members of her own family. When she was young, women weren’t even being given anything for the pain, because it was supposed to be the curse of Eve.

There were many thousands of arrests of civil rights protesters in the 60s and 70s, too. Of course, if you’re old enough to have experienced that time, you were probably referring to the civil rights activists as “outside agitators” for daring to stand against Jim Crow.

The whole concept of “paid union thugs” comes from the overactive imaginations (and underpowered minds) of right-wing nutjobs.

Lying about what? The rape, destruction of private property, drug abuse, forcing local government to spend money they don’t have to protect you people, or deaths?  All are true and reported on.  Your arguments are weak and your personal attacks are even worse.  Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner and so were the majority of those in politics in the years after the revolution.  There were slavery all over the world at one point or another.  Was it wrong?  Hell yeah it was.  You don’t understand the difference or have the intelligence to differentiate, the difference between an idea and action of those founding fathers.  You can be blind to Democratic history all you want but those who gave the slaves their freedom, abolish Jim Crow laws were Republicans and those who voted for and support them were Democrats.   You would like the government to be the one and all father and mother to you and if you want that, go to where I was born and see how much freedom you get.  Move to Vietnam and see how the government can control you and destroy at a whim.  Your kind act like petulant children when you don’t get your way and try to destroy and demean people at every corner.  When they fight back with your tactics, you scream like spoiled brats.

Naturally, you don’t need any credible source reporting it to buy into that bullcrap.

Of maybe to protect everyone else from contracting whatever potentially contagious illness is impairing his mind.

I suspect rabies.

You’re trying to make the movement out to be malicious group of unruly poor urban kids. We are black, white, gay, straight, old, young, poor, and rich.

You very well know that these are isolated incidences and you’re destroying any shred of credibility in this argument you have left.

Naturally, your source is as non-credible as it gets. The Faily Caller, enough said.

The GOP media (Fox “News”, Limbaugh, Beck, etc) have for decades told their ignorant audience that labor unions are evil. Dittoheads like sara can’t help but believe the lies.

No, Teddy, I believe you’re describing yourself.

Typical Liberal….state a charge with no facts to back it up.

There wasn’t any reason for somebody to leap out and start yelling incoherently at them. Protesting against the CPAC extremists is not the same as “disrupting” CPAC.

Though your continued fear of the nonexistent “ACORN” boogieman is amusing.

The fact that arrests happened doesn’t make the arrests justified. In virtually every case, the police have been aggressive, violent thugs in dealing with OWS. It’s always been the police who instigated problems.

Yes, you’ve read reports from the corporate media. Which, being corporate, is innately biased against the very concept of Occupy Wall Street.

It was far more than a “handful” of racist signs at Tea Party rallies. Racist signs were common sights at basically every Tea Party rally across the country. And this wasn’t a coincidence, because the Tea Party’s reason for existence was rage over the fact that a black guy is president. And telling OWSers to quit raping people because some OWS members have been the victims of rape ought to be beyond the pale even for Dimbart, but blaming the victim is something he likes to do apparently.

And those chants at CPAC? Given that white supremacist Peter Brimelow was invited as a featured speaker, and the GOP platform openly opposes equal rights for gays and women, I don’t see how it’s out of line to refer to CPAC attendees as “racist, sexist, anti-gay; right wing bigots”.

I think there are many on the Right who are sick and tired of always rising above it.

How can you be sick and tired of doing something that you’ve never actually done?

The OWCPAC group isn’t there to protest. They are there to disrupt. They
were paid to be there, many didn’t know why they were even there.

So says a highly dishonest right-wing “news” site, the Daily Caller. Oddly enough, no credible sources say this.

And they were chanting to shut down free speech and the freedom to
assemble peacefully, and they were chanting “racist, sexist, anti-gay;
right wing bigots, go away.”

Expressing disapproval of the bigoted things being said at CPAC is not attempting to “shut down free speech and the freedom to assemble peacefully”. It’s simply responding with speech and peaceful assembly of their own.

LaRouche supporters most certainly are not “left wing socialist Democrats”. They’re lunatic fringe conspiracy theorists and fascists.  They weren’t infiltrating the Tea Party, they were charter members of the Tea Party.

Except the Tea Party isn’t libertarian at all. They’re social conservatives as well as fiscal conservatives, and social conservatism is incompatible with libertarianism.

You know, with that kind of comment, I find it very hard to believe that you are a rape counselor, as no person who counsels victims of something as haenous as rape will be that retarded enough to try and make this crime a hotbed political issue and use it as an excuse to dismiss the Occupy movement.

No, the Oakland Police are scum. They’ve been known since long before the Occupy protests as thugs who routinely violate the civil rights of the populace.

Yes, they’re in the House and Senate and have done immense damage to America by being there. And Congress has a 6% approval rating since the Tea Partiers got there.

No, that’s not what “TEA” stands for. The idea of it being an acronym for “taxed enough already” came months after the Tea Party rallies started. And it’s absurd anyway given that taxes are at an 80-year low right now.

Well from the looks of these comments, I think it is safe to say that many on here don’t really care much for rape victims as they are much exploiting the issue of rape to diminish the occupy movement. By that standard we would have to assume that most people who have a job are parasites and vermin because according to this study by the CDC, over 13,000 women are raped on the job each year in the united states.

http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/violnonf.html

Wait until you see the dossier I have on you !!

dude, dont even stress it, these people are idiots. one of them was joking about your daughters being raped @ OWS, and the other is a fake rape counseLLer. they are disgusting hypocrites, plain and simple. there was nothing casual in your rape comment , think about it. these are the same peeps, who boo soldiers because they are gay and cheer for people dying because they dont have health insurance. 

No, all of those things are not true. They’re massive distortions at best.

And no, it wasn’t Republicans who got rid of Jim Crow segregation. Segregation ended when the racists were told that they were no longer welcome in the Democratic Party. The Republican Party proceeded to welcome those racist ex-Democrats with open arms. It’s called the Southern Strategy. Look it up.

 I agree with Breitbart. Stop raping people, OWS!
And while you’re at it, Stop shitting in the streets and on cop cars!
What are you guys? A bunch of dumb animals or something?

Crypto-fascists like Breibart believe all protesters are traitors if they don’t respect corporate dominance.

Fong I realize you think Home Schooling is the greatest thing since sliced bread. So here is your first Home School test…Delineate the difference between the words “fain” and “feign”, in twenty five words or less, please. I realize this is a radical departure from the T/F questions you’ve become so accustomed to.

It’s ok, I’m done with you. I know now that even if I link news articles, pictures, videos or any other thing I can find on the destruction the Occupy movement have done, you won’t even admit anything and continue to defend those horrible people.  Republicans did alienate blacks in the south by going after the southern white vote but if you did even a little bit of research and look at the vote count of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, you’ll see that Republicans voted for it at 80% at every level of the process, while Democrats still voted only 69% of the time even after the Southern Strategy.  I’m pretty sure you’ll try to draw a comparison between Robert Byrd (D), a KKK, member with an idiot like Storm Thurmond (R) who is a racist.  Again, your revisionist history is not worth my time.  You have a good life in la la land.

andrew breitbart is an attention whore trying to provoke them into looking bad
unfortunately for him, the only monster in the crowd was him

Nice attack on a missed spelled word.  I wrote the wrong thing, I should just give you a cookie and I was in one of your failing public school and English is my second language.  I think I make a case for home schooling or charter school.  Don’t you agree?

Just for the record, I flagged this clear call to violent action more than 6 hours ago.  No response.  Great work Mediaite.  

For the record, I wrote a response about 5 hours ago with evidence and links that has not yet appeared.  A couple of right wingers above have called for murderous violence, were flagged and still stand.  But my linked response is in limbo.  Great work Mediaite.  Very liberal of y’all.

“Yeah, yelling ‘stop raping people’ to people practicing their first amendment rights is really adding to the debate.”

The fleabaggers weren’t exercising their right to free speach. They were trying to deny the CPACers their right to peaceful assembly. If you’ll take the time to look at some of the OWS sites that publicized this mob action, you’ll see that their clear intent was to shut down the CPAC altogether.

But I guess racist, sexist anti-gay folks don’t really have any rights, do they?

Breitbart is a partisan nut job. But so are all these nuts protesting against free speech that they disagree with. Seriously. What’s next, occupy comicon?

Can you imagine Big Drew screaming outside of a military base?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/dec/09/rape-us-military

So you’re like six years old or something? “You’re a big poopy head” isn’t a response that going to impress anybody.

Ahh, a quick view of your Facebook profile and I see that you went from my beloved Marine Corps to sucking on the government teat of the people.  Must be nice, oorah devildog, oorah. Now I understand why you’re such a liberal.

So I guess your next crusade will be to go after the Catholic Church for the rape, torture and continued cover-up of children?

“Stop raping people?”

No. Get ready for a rape-a-palooza, where we have sex on top of shitty cop cars.  

I didn’t realize Andrew was so interested in rape victims.  I guess his next cursade will be holding the bishops and pope accountable for the rape and torture of children. The below numbers are low since this is just what has been reported and is only to 2002, but it is a good start.

“The report of Roman Catholic priests molesting children is simply amazing. The
study found that 4,392 of the 109,694 priests who served from 1950 to 2002 had
been accused of sexually abusing 10,667 minors. That is an enormous amount of
children abused over 52 years by supposedly men of the cloth.”

You really do need to read up on Sanger.  In 1933,  a merger was attempted between Sanger’s organization, the American Birth Control League, and the American Eugenics Society. It did not succeed due to organizational difficulties, but all the leaders agreed that all the groups had the same fundamental goals.

The first Planned Parenthood office was given free of charge by the Eugenics Educational Society.

Fong you’re so defensive. You’re not back in Tiananmen Square. It’s ok you’re safe now. BTW, now that you’re here, in the states, you should google everything you’re forbidden to google in China. And don’t try to fool me and convince me you’re Vietnamese, Thai or Korean. Fong is a Chinese name. Ni how ma. As for me…Hen how. 

Thanks for mentioning my Marine Corps service, but my living off the government teat goes much deeper than that. You forgot to mention that I was in the Navy as well. But thank you for the OOO RAH! Semper Fi!

You know, you would think that if you are Chinese (Chongo) you would be Liberal. Since the Conservatives are not only trying to send you back to Bejing, but also bury you economically. They view China as the “Evil Empire”, and Wen Jiabao as Darth Vader. You must be Taiwanese.

Calm down Fong. You making a classic mistake, that of generalizing. This is how bigotry gains hold. It’s like saying all orientals are “sneaky”, ok that’s not a good example because all orientals are “sneaky”. Here’s a better example all Conservatives are ignorant racists, oh shoot that’s another bad example.

Breitbart is one ugly arrogant guy that will do anything if front of the cameras just to get attention.
You females out their, how would you like to wake up to that every morning?

On the contrary, Andrew Breitbart takes himself way too seriously as a media player while he fails to exercise the very self-discipline he demands of Liberals.  Fox have had him on as a commentator many times and will continue to do so.  Fox invite rhetoric that denigrates the President and his wife, or Liberals generally, whether it’s true or not, anything they can get away with.  Everyone knows this, it’s not news. 

We have the best political system money can buy.They absolutely do not represent the people.California didn’t pass universal single payer healthcare,by two votes.Two democrats voted no,and four democrats didn’t show up to vote.These six democrats were paid forty thousand each on average in campaign contributions from the healthcare industry.ABC,CBS.NBC.ZERO coverage.I’m sure the oligarchs threw them a party.

You try to spin it as if there’s a rape every five minutes,you’re missing the point.People are desperate and pissed off,who knows this could turn into a violent revolution.

You’re right he does demand self-discipline of the left and he should do it himself.  I agree with that.  You attack Fox for their guest and the way they treat Obama and his wife.  You fail to mention how MSNBC treated a sitting president when Bush was in office and the things they say about him and his wife and family.

In fairness to the OWS movement,putting up tents in the fall and winter attracks mentally ill homeless folk,but of course right wingers wouldn’t differentiate the two when it comes to rape.

Dude let’s not go into American political history. Since you seem to be naively aware of it. Here’s a little test, if Liberals lived in 1861 which party would they have belonged to? That’s right, the Republican party. I would have been a “bleeding heart” Republican. If Liberals lived in America at the turn of the 20th century they would have been Republicans. Now let’s fast forward to an era you only skimmed in your research on American political history. What party did George Wallace belong to? George was the racist Governor of the state of Alabama. That’s right he was a Democrat. He ran for the Democratic Presidential nomination in 1968. What party was Lester Maddox a member of? Lester was the racist Governor of Georgia. That’s right he was a Democrat in the mid to late 60′s. It was around this time that Southern Democrats were beginning to realize that the Democratic party, the party they loved so much because it wasn’t the party of Lincoln was changing and becoming more Liberal. It was under the Democrats that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed. And while many in the South vowed they would never be Republicans, they soon found out that the Democratic Party had now become the party of Lincoln. This is how Southern Democrats became Southern Republicans. Now in reality it is a little more complicated than my simplistic synopsis, but the reality of John F. Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson championing Civil Rights was a key factor to the South becoming Republican. And Republicans have been catering to them ever since. No one is denying that those Democrats weren’t racist, what we are saying is that go back far enough and you will find that Liberals were once Republicans and Conservatives were once Democrats. Don’t ask me how but the two parties switched political principles. The ultimate Flip-Flop you might say. Which is why if you look back far enough you will see that Republicans, most notably Newt was in favor of an “individual mandate” when it came to health care. Why Mitt was also in favor of universal healthcare. Son don’t pick your principles by the party, pick your party by it’s  principles. If in ten years from now the Democratic party reverts back to post Civil War principles and the Republican party once again becomes the party of Lincoln, then I will be a Republican.

Hi Stonepark!

Sorry to laugh, but that was priceless.  Wait, no, I’m not.

The same homeless people who were not originally part of the demonstrations, but were living in alleys and under bridges, then steered toward the demonstrations by the police?  Those homeless people?

Spoken like a true product of the lazy Internet/texting age.  Even though you’re old and trying to fit in.  Sad.

Aww did I make an fool out of you with the whole spell check deal?  So sad.  I am Vietnamese, and it shows that you’re are a complete cac (lock that up on Google yourself).  You don’t even understand the culture of Vietnamese and some of our origins, if I want my name to be spelled Fong so it can be easier to understand, then it’s Fong.  Of course, you go on believing in what you believe in.  I knew I can draw the racist out of you.  You even used the massacre of people to prove your point! I’m so proud of you.

When I mentioned your teat sucking abilities, I’m thinking more in line of can’t finding a normal human being job and working for DFAS, it’s all so nice of them to give you such a cushy job isn’t it? Oh yeah, I forgot, the government about to give you guys a 3% pay raise soon no?  Nice isn’t it?  You like your almost free health care paid and delivered by tax payers around the U.S.?  I forgot you also have TSP, 1 for 1 is a nice deal too.  

You don’t even understand most Asians coming from communist countries, they tend to be conservative or leaning Republican when it comes to political affiliation. Oh but I forgot to ask, are you ASIAN?!, you would know something like that or lived and/or talked to your family who were oppressed by government sponsor squads.  You and your family were forced from Vietnam in the middle of the night on a fish boat the size of a truck to escape starvation.  Your family spent years in refugee camps trying to find a way to a country that can provide you freedom and a way of life where you’re free.  You know us so well. 

On top of that you like to put words and accuse a group of people with actions you have nothing to back up with, of course it’d be a political group you disagree with.  You’re right, China is an evil empire, they destroy people’s liberty just like the government of Vietnam.  They fixed prices to make themselves rich.  If you had half a brain of a normal person, you’d see that the government people are the richest people and the poor are the general peons they oppress but I forgot, liberals view communist/socialism as a superior form of government.

You are a sad sad person indeed.  A person that is an immigrant  to this country finds the U.S. Constitution and system of government in which the people are free, being more valuable then people like you who were born here and despised it and wish to change it to something it was never meant to be.

Good luck on your delusional views of life. 

Fong I don’t believe you for one minute. You are so full of it. Say, you say your parents were “boat people”? I may have picked them up. Our ship picked up some “boat people” in 1981. I even received a ribbon for it. Although I actually had very little to do with the actual recovery of the “boat people” other than being an officer aboard the ship. And really, you need to google Fong, it is a Chinese surname. Better try another name in your next post, one more closely associated with the Vietnamese. Try “Trang” that should work for you, that or “Ho”.

No kidding Sherlock.  Fong is a Chinese name but it’s has a Vietnamese equal just like the majority of Vietnamese names out there and if you’re smart enough, you can figure the equal name out.  Ah sad, you’re so ignorant, yes my family were boat people and they left Vietnam after you were long gone,1986. There were man waves and I doubt you were there for my wave.  You are much older then I am and I would think older people would be a bit more intelligent about history, especially, history that they lived through.

I’ll give you credit for trying again but my response to a person stuck in his mind is not needed. Done enough of that already.

It appears that cultural battle was just too much for Andrew Breitbart.

Quite frankly Bruce, I don’t give a rats behind about either party. I am a Libertarian but we have no home but the Republican party is the closest thing to home.

I’m not persauded by the Equivalency Arguments resorted to by Conservatives, and accepted by Mediaite, Jon Stewart and Politifact, when it comes to MSNBC and Fox.  I think they are two organisations with their own agendas, to be taken on their own terms, and not the yin and yang of each other.  So naturally I don’t feel the need to offset comments about one with comments on the other.

Breitbart’s an idiot, and once again due to his celebrity, gets away with this crap while the cops rather than arresting him ‘shield him from the protesters’. If that were you, me or anyone else yelling obnoxiously at a group of people like he was at the very least we’d be arrested for disorderly conduct, as well as public intoxication. …And yeah, him doing this follows the same logic as any of us going to our nearest catholic church, walking up to the priest of it, and continuously screaming at him to ‘stop raping kids’ until the cops have to escort us away… like I said, we’d most certainly be arrested.

You are comparing a one day event to a occupation lasting several months. Big difference!

The tea party had encampments that lasted several months?
 News to me!

Thank you!

I noticed your conservative friend who was provoking me has had his comments removed.
Rapes do happen and having a blind eye to them it wrong. Making this a political or partisan issue is also wrong.Do you understand that?

No, probably not.But who knows? I believe it was Stonepark who was the fake rape counselor and was provoking me earlier in this thread . His comments were all removed.

Why not just arrest the paid thugs for disorderly?

http://nation.foxnews.com/unions/2012/02/11/unions-paid-occupy-cpac-protesters-60

they are not protesters, they are union workers being paid to do a job…

http://nation.foxnews.com/unions/2012/02/11/unions-paid-occupy-cpac-protesters-60

Mediaite doesn’t take links anymore. Spend five minutes on google search OWS and rape, and you will find out.

Innocent people?

http://nation.foxnews.com/unions/2012/02/11/unions-paid-occupy-cpac-protesters-60

Seems like these paid workers are getting the free  pass…

Excersising thierfirst amendmant rights? Really?

http://nation.foxnews.com/unions/2012/02/11/unions-paid-occupy-cpac-protesters-60

Thomas Jefferson was the greatest man who ever lived and that quote is an example of why.

So says a highly dishonest right-wing “news” site, the Daily Caller. Oddly enough, no credible sources say this.

No, so says the people who were paid to be there. 

Forcing yourselves into speeches, and trying to shout down speakers, and chanting hey hey ho ho CPAC must go is trying to shut down free speech. 

Hes #11 on this site, saw it onmy way in…

“Nice to see you are being so reasonable and open minded, But not everyone can live up to your high standards.”
Nice to see you completely missed the point.

He has massive credibility to me but that mostly comes from all the right (sry left) people hating him so much.

I couldnt find that article, do you have a link?

Oh wait, here it is on a different site…

http://nation.foxnews.com/unions/2012/02/11/unions-paid-occupy-cpac-protesters-60

how much do you get paid at the local occupy?

http://nation.foxnews.com/unions/2012/02/11/unions-paid-occupy-cpac-protesters-60

What commitment to nonviolence? These people dont even know where they are…

http://nation.foxnews.com/unions/2012/02/11/unions-paid-occupy-cpac-protesters-60

Mister provocateur?

http://nation.foxnews.com/unions/2012/02/11/unions-paid-occupy-cpac-protesters-60

JERRY,

I laughed out loud when I read your post.  Reminded me of the tavern humor found in cozy, out of the way places where friends and co-workers gather.  For instance, there is a little place called the Columbine, in Golden, (Pleasant View) Colorado I used to frequent, where clever quips are frequent.

Curiously, there is a VFW hall right behind the “Bine,” so veterans, union men, bikers and locals all rub shoulders.  Harry the owner, is a veteran of D-Day, 2nd wave, no shitt.

Anyway, despite the fact I laughed at your humor, you wouldn’t last 5 minutes in the “Bine” or the VFW hall.

Purveyor of Rhetoric

Words used about the Occupy movement here are ‘layabouts, garbage, losers, filth, scum, thugs, nuts and aberrants’ And that’s just on this one page. But they are not a crazy minority: like that lady who used to protest the war in Iraq (and who was mercilessly vilified by the right-wing media for standing outside the White House), they are simply the vocal spearhead of a national, no: hold on, a GLOBAL movement.
It’s happening all over Europe, its happening in the Mid East and Africa and across South America. It may indeed be the resurgence of socialism that the British Ministry of Defense was predicting fifteen years ago: the betrayed and impoverished middle-classes, aghast at the destruction of their public institutions and their new-found financial insecurity, are starting to realize that ‘trickle down’ economics never trickled down: they did nothing but trickle up and stay at the top.
The abomination of the super-rich has become so obvious, so obscene and so clearly dangerous to democracy and true republicanism that the people are finally starting to get angry: behind every OWS protestor who come out on the street is 100 American families who have to stay home but who agree with their principles.

 Pure right-wing boilerplate lies from the desk of Roger Ailes: all the right buzz-words, all the correct, false inferences: straight out of the Newt Gingrich playbook of how to vilify and slander your opponents without dealing with any of the issues they want to discuss.

You are standing appropriate human interaction on its head.  To what ends, I ask?

A man confronts an unruly and volatile mob, a relatively courageous gesture and YOU salute the mob?

Did you have parents or simply an incubator?

Your usual articulate and insightful self…

And you out the “loose” in loose bowels?  Ouch!

hm

You forgot to call the “rethuglickers,” “capitalist running dog, lackey, pigs.”  Right out of the Chairman Mao book of the revolutionary vernacular.  Ouch!

Your avatar is perfect for you as you are hypnotized, brainwashed into thinking and talking just like a Socialist revolutionary.  You are a caricature, a dangerous one, but a caricature nonetheless.

  You mother must be so proud?

Hey Bob,

“Cultural battle?”  Isn’t that phrase an oxymoron with regard to OWS, Socialists, and Democrats in general?

Wouldn’t “dysfunctional battle” be more apropos?

Purveyor

 Anarchy, anti-Semitism, leeches feeding at the taxpayer trough, and yes Democrats in general are all apt descriptions.

Take note voters:
Still waiting for the White House to denounce the OWS violence…Still waiting…..Still waiting….Do you hear that SILENCE?

remember it 11-06-12!

This is the dearth of character & integrity your President has.

Your an IDIOT. The payed ($60.00), useless debris came to CPAC uninvited and were interfering with other people’s freedom of expression. If allowed they would enter and cause physical harm.I wonder how many rapes they did commit or how many drugs they took with their union pay while there. Facts are facts. They don’t change just because a liberal doesn’t like them.

Are you serious? He was simply using their own tactics on them!

LOL. A typical liberal. You can’t offer an intelligent argument so instead you call someone names like a child on the school ground!

 Great retort!

Cal’s kind of thinking fixates on an indoctrinated narrative or belief (typically spawned and propagated via the DNC Media) and obliges reality to comport with those fixations.

When reality won’t, they’ll scream RACIST!

 You’re sounding more and more like a personified Democratic talking point – using misrepresentations, snippets, and half-truths to comport with your intransigent, indoctrinated worldviews.

Fong took you to the cleaners in his/her rebuttal!

It’s obvious from many comments that the unions are paying people to support them on line also. Fortunately the stupidity of most of the comments attempting to support OWS idiots are the opposite of helpful to them.

You and your comments are a joke! Non violent OWS?! What world do you come from, Bizzaro land?

What else do you think he is?
A talented actor showing his talent in front of the police officers and the crowd? :)

I am 62.   I cannot remember a time in our history when the citizens of our country have been so antagonistic and dismissive of one another over political views.      This has come about since Obama became president and it is not because of his race but rather his policies.  He promised to change the tone in Washington, well, he has succeeded but not only in Washington.  Across the country there are many ready to commit violence against their fellow citizens simply because they are of the other political view.   Hatred over political viewpoints is growing.

Things have been poisonous since the early 1990s when conservative operatives started a whisper campaign against the Clintons about their having killed Vince Foster and radio talk show hosts felt comfortable advancing insane conspiracy theories and leveling fact-free accusations that never had to be proven. Washington has been awash in intense bitterness and hatred for at least two decades.

 Five people “liked” a commenter telling a woman to, “Stop wearing your rapes as if it is a badge of honor and credibility”?

I only mentioned my experience because another commenter had mentioned experience as a rape counselor as a source of credibility to attack Occupy…and received 20+ likes!

I feel sick to my stomach. Thanks for making me lose the remainder of my faith in humanity.

My friend just met a chocolate man on Blackwhitemeet.COMit’s where for men and women looking for interracial’ship for a fabulous lifestyle
It’s a nice place for black white sing’les, to interact with each other…no bounds or extremes in front of true love.

Hey 1%, STOP raping people!!

You mean like Breitbart making it seem like OWS is just there to rape.

You’re probably right.  I need to remember that Stonepark isn’t the only one who relies on likebots on Internet comment sections for self-validation.

That would be bullshit. Union members exercising their First Amendment rights in association with OccupyCPAC — because they realize that CPACers are hardened enemies of labor’s right to organize itself — is light years away from “paid union thugs.” Union members are present, of course, because their livelihoods are threatened by CPAC madness, but so are the livelihoods of millions of others. Who also were represented among the protestors.

You just don’t like the bullyboys of CPAC being called out for the sociopaths they are. Get used to it. the 99ers are fighting back.

His policies? Would you mind being more specific

Good for you Charlie!

Dysfunctional is a word I now hear all the time in reference to humans. It seems to me a rather cold use of the word.Dysfunctional seems more like when my lawn mower won’t start. 
Just sayin’

How have you been Jess?

 That is a really sad and disturbing post, one that more than anything shows the bizarre partisan world that you dwell in.

One of the worst disgraces in all of media further proving what a disgusting human being he is…

 It may be time to go to the Library of Congress to scan microfilm – I’m guessing that your grandfather wrote a lot of letters to the editor alleging that the Civil Rights movement was all about rape. 

You haven’t been paying attention.  It started w/Clinton’s impeachment and has gotten louder and more polemic since then – fanned by the money to make their final push against the middle class.

You’re = you are.  Your = belonging to you.

Wrong bub. That wonderful joke about killing Andrew via Planned Parenthood was your side’s sick attempt at humor. Take a minute and catch up with those of us who are aware of the history of PP.

Yeah, all those rapes at Tea Party rallies really stunned us too. 

Tea party community? Were did they set up camp?

How would they report it if some liberal went to a tea party rally and starting screaming for them to behave themselves and stop raping people? Interesting question. Personally I don’t know, but they probably wouldn’t have claimed that the screaming liberal was trying to start a chat

Nothing there except Fox saying they were paid. No verification at all except for a “watch the video” link which goes to breitbart.tv. Need I say more? I think not!

We have the good sense to make our point and than get back to, yaknow, our lives. Our careers. Our families.

Typical response from a REgressive BTW-if you want to call a HazMat necessary cleanup from the filth left from OWS a 
“community” fine by me.

Perhaps one of our greater symptoms of societal illness in America, is denial of the truth. Or worse, failure to pursue the truth fearful that dissonance may occur.

Some of our cultures greatest experts on “truth” are recovering alcoholics and addicts as they know that to solve a problem, one must admit to a problem’s existence. As a rape victim, compassion is an appropriate response to be given to you. However, continual commiseration, which is similar to how America has handled race issues, etc., will only perpetuate a problem, not heal the wound, so to speak.

If you are “sick to [your] stomach,” don’t blame me, as I’m only the philosopher…

LOL! I suppose when you cannot respond with a well reasoned, factual, logical argument, a child must pick at something to make themselves feel better. Can your daddy beat up mine? LOL!

He tried to “chat” by calling people animals, freaks and rapists???? That was not very civil of him…..he is the one that looks like he’s been camping outside for months! 

VOLT,

Actually quite well, thank you.OWS is not a paragon of societal virtue only intent on exposing the greedy and corrupt. They are an example of eclectic dysfunction, a collection of misfits and the misguided.

OWS behavior has not been made of providing a message to others, rather, OWS is only about actions, both vulgar and incoherent.  Would you prefer that America’s deliberative law making bodies make laws by such methods?  That wouldn’t even be anarchy as “anarchy” would be superior to the unkempt rabble lacking in cogent consistency.

A group protest can and has been effective in creating change within a context that has defined grievances and goals, not what we see from OWS crew.

“We are a Nation not of men, but of laws.”  Somehow America has gone astray from that ideal.  I suggest we return to that vision and repair what damage we ourselves have caused based on that philosophy?

Purveyor

I think there are too many laws. It is getting ridiculous.As far as protesting goes. That is a 1st amendment right. Although I think there are too many laws I also am a big supporter of the Bill of Rights. I am a ACLU card carrying member.

I can’t be held responsible for your ignorance of recent events, dear.

Non sequiturs are fun.

As well as from the unions who pay thugs to attend rallies.

If you are going to rely on popular movements, then you will have to live with those movements with whom you don’t agree. If you want the country to accept the Tea party but reject Occupy Wall Street, you better have a better reason than not liking them. Opinions are like assholes, every body has one. I think the Tea Party is astroturf racist nonesense but I know I have no right to insist they don’t exist. They are entitled to organise, protest and demand the changes they think is needed in the country. My opinion of what they stand for is as good as anyone else’s.

And guess who was Planned Parenthood’s first national treasurer… Hint, it rhymes with Bush… http://bit.ly/901YPF
 

And guess who was Planned Parenthood’s first national treasurer… Hint, it rhymes with Bush… http://bit.ly/901YPF
 

You are right. And you need to read up on the Bush family. Prescott Bush, W’s grandfather, was actively involved in Planned Parenthood and the American Birth Control League. http://bit.ly/901YPF

And guess which European leader took many aspects of Margaret Sanger’s eugenics policies and implemented them into his foundational view of Jews, etc?   Hint, it rhymes with Hitler.

VOLT,

What the OWS has been doing is NOT protected speech!  I know an awful lot about Con-Law and the first amendment.  You are correct, we don’t need more laws, we need to enforce the one’s we have!

However, for some reason, (political)? in various cities the OWS has been able to skirt the law as the powers that be are afraid to enforce the law.  Perhaps because the OWS has become as skilled as their forebears in manipulating the media and the police?  Throwing rocks, blocking intersections, illegal camping are NOT protected speech.  Are our cities afraid to enforce the law out of fear of resembling Egypt, Libya and Greece?  You bet they are!

Google “time, place and manner” considerations regarding the 1st amendment. also, “the Lemmon test” and the “Fighting Words Doctrine.”  NONE of our civil liberties are absolute.

I used to be an ACLU member.  But, when the ACLU became equally as dangerous as the Reverend Fred Phelps and other religious fanatics, I didn’t renew.  (I have read “Defending my Enemy,” and that gallant organization (ACLU) no longer exists)

Say what you want about OWS, you have that right, but they have changed the narrative by shedding light on the 1% and how the system is geared in their direction!!

Breitbart lost all credibility after his film editing fiasco… and he knows it!!

Obamacare?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/10/cpac-protester-says-was-paid-60-to-show-up/

Did you say disorderly conduct? Are you that ignorant of what is really happenning here, or are you just blowing smoke like a typical libtard?

Did you say greed and corruption? Union dues at work here…

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/10/cpac-protester-says-was-paid-60-to-show-up/

OK, point taken.

Please be sure you don’t miss the salient point of my comment, though. The OWS is ancillary, the real issue I address is the 1st amendment and free speech.

The OWS with the culpable help of the Media and a timid Government has allowed our Constitution and Laws to be selectively applied. That is NOT equal protection and is certainly not neutral principle.

Once upon a time, America “selectively applied” many laws regarding race. The cultural denial of that era, is shameful. Equal protection is not something Americans are supposed to pick and choose?

You might disagree with my conclusions LEE, but the methodology is consistent. Living by neutral principle means you strive for integrity and character. Not outcome. The truth tends to set things straight?

Purveyor

They have no right, they are paid thugs NOT citizens excersising their rights.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/10/cpac-protester-says-was-paid-60-to-show-up/

Which of the 1% is giving them the money?

Does the 1st amendmant apply to paid thugs?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/10/cpac-protester-says-was-paid-60-to-show-up/

Fix news, really? Whas your news outlet of choice, and can you find this on there:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/10/cpac-protester-says-was-paid-60-to-show-up/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/10/cpac-protester-says-was-paid-60-to-show-up/

I wonder hw much they charge for rape?

NEIL,

Should you and I be angry, or weep? What would Thomas Jefferson say?

There is a plurality, a cancer that grows within America that is so self assured, so conceited that they rationalize: “the ends justifies the means.” (history has many examples of such)

The Socialist who goes by the name “MAYHEM” asked me today…How is Obama dismantling America? This is one example you offer. The South Western Border, the Black Panthers at Philadelphia, ACORN, the Military, and on and on…are others.

Lenin would approve, wouldn’t he? But then I’m/we are paranoid, right?

Thanks for the comment and nice to make your acquaintance.

Purveyor

How about this.  When the thread is about Bush, we’ll talk about Bush.  Right now we’re talking about Sanger and Planned Parenthood’s ultimate goal.  Please stay on topic.

 Paid, not “payed.”

Many CPAC attendees’ costs were paid for or subsidized by entities other than the attendees themselves. Assuming you’re arguing that the unions paid protesters to stand outside to also express themselves under the protection of the 1st Amendment, it’s the same “pawn” argument inside as outside the conference.

You say “facts are facts” after positing conditional statements and flights of wonderment for which you provide no factual conditions to support either.

Facts don’t change if they don’t exist in the first place. Wise up.

 “”We are a Nation not of men, but of laws.”  Somehow America has gone astray from that ideal”

OWS agrees with your statement with respect to the fact that the standing laws regulating Wall Street financial investment firms and large banks are not being enforced because of the cronyism inside the financial-congressional complex, and the laws passed in the past 20 years were written BY those firms and banks.

When the laws subvert, distort and destroy that vision from which you would like to “repair what damage we ourselves have caused,” there can be no repair, because the tools are broken.

OWS demands that we repair the tools.

Leedog is right!
We both do not condone violence of any kind at any Occupy site.
Don’t judge a book by it’s cover or what you see in the media. This violence is committed a very few idiots that show up.Believe me as a group most OWS people do not endorse this bad behavior  

Well stated Volt!!

No argument with Purveyor’s last comment!!

HUFF,

I have a thesis which is part of philosophy I have created and been promoting, it’s called “economic treason.”

Defined as:

A private economic decision that has negative results on National economic security or  public safety.  Economic treason is, presently, only envisioned as a philosophy to enlighten and guide.

However, depending on the severity of the profiteering or corruption and the damage to the Nation, could become a codified, criminal offense, thus punishable by fines or prison.

Corporate executives as well as Union bosses are both in a position to commit “economic treason.”  Sending jobs “off shore” while bringing in low wage labor could be economic treason.  A Union leveraging a Corporation while disregarding that corporations and shareholder’s financial health, could be economic treason.

Ergo, I believe we have some common ground?

I am concerned with your euphemism…”tools?”  I prefer NOT to make any assumptions as to what you are referring too as this could be a very touchy point.  Thus, I ask you respectfully, to clarify your last paragraph and the word “tools.”

Purveyor

God Bless Andrew Breitbart

And that has changed your life in what way? How has it had a negative effect on you personally?

The tools by which we repair the laws: the lawmaking process as it stands with its corruption.

Your economic treason thesis needs work, especially with regard to governmental policies toward unions, corporations and world trade to the extent that those policies were created by unions, corporations and foreign trading partners with the intent to disadvantage others outside of market forces and our government’s responsibility to us, the people, for allowing it … and our responsibility as citizens to ensure the government works for all of us and not just for those who can buy it.

Hey Hey, MY MY.

And most rapes go unreported!

Why the hell would god do that?

Quit raping people? Was he talking to OWS or the Catholic Priesthood? 

I thought we were talking about George Bernard Shaw??

My friend just met a chocolate man on Blackwhitemeet.COMit’s where for men and women looking for interracial’ship for a fabulous lifestyle
It’s a nice place for black white sing’les, to interact with each other…no bounds or extremes in front of true love.

Breitbart is a sad human being.

Yeah really. What does a CPAC protester being paid $60 have to do with part of Ruper Murdoch’s empire being the biggest right-wing propaganda media outlet ever? No comparison their Einstein.

Roman: No OWS does not represent the 99%. Do they have some points that agree with many of us and the Tea Party? Yes! What we disagree with is what it takes to fix the problem. OWS supporters would have us embrace some form of socialism or communism. Only if all of the 99% wanted socialism or communism would you be representing us. The solutions the OWS supporters want will bring us down and have a new set of 1% with lots more of our wealth and a much bigger set of poverty level families. No middle class left, and above all no individual rights. The state will tell us what to do. You think we have corruption now but just wait until you give those in government all that power. It is a common tactic of the communist thugs and agitators to claim they are doing it for the people. Its what they did in Russia when the communist took over.  

What’s their to argue about that? That’s a fact.

I didn’t call him one name. I merely stated a fact. Am I wrong? Nope

He knew they were there and he went out to provoke an attack, it didnt work.

OR, he was trying to commit “suicide by mob” and it didnt work.

Did you notice how he sought out the cameras before beginning his tirade? And did so with a security detail from the Hotel around him.

It didn’t start with this administration……………Lets look back some before this admin started…..things weren’t hunky dory

Looks like the Neil Murphy couldn’t retort to you query. 

that’s all andrew has………..Pobrecito!

Keystone?

The point is that like it or not, FOX news tells the truth while other stations bury the truth..

It would be impossible to diminish the occupy movement..

Anyone see Bart on Huckabee tonight? Who was the liberal lady on the panel with him? She was sexy and I want to google her…

Why the fat chick hate?

Why the Glenn Beck hate? No one would even pay attention to him if the stupid liberals didnt attackk him every single day…

Bill-O is awesome, lookin out for the folks.

lol we dont hate those turdds…

lol at ows’s  success…If crapping in the park is an accomplishment, well done.

How bout a link to the 2A solutions comment from the tea party…

Targeted for violence by the police? No one has been shot yet.

God bless the 2nd amendment.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/10/cpac-protester-says-was-paid-60-to-show-up/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/10/cpac-protester-says-was-paid-60-to-show-up/

Im guessing it was a 1 percenter union boss who handed out th money.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/10/cpac-protester-says-was-paid-60-to-show-up/

Obamacare won’t start its full assault on the American health care and insurance industries until 2013, you ignorant leftard….     Hopefully by then the SCOTUS will rule it unconstitutional, which it is.

Yes, aside from spelling and grammar skills, the entire dishonest pitch of their arguments demonstrates that OWS supporters are ignorant and able, as the Brits like to put it, “to swallow a camel, but strain at a gnat.”

“Many CPAC attendees’ costs were paid for or subsidized by entities other than the attendees themselves….” flies in the logic of the ridiculous assumption that the so-called “1%” in the agitprop of the OWS ideologues wouldn’t actually pay their own way and attend the CPAC speeches.    Of course, like any leftard, you have no way of substantiating your slanderous allegations whereas FOX has several slackers and layabouts admitting they’re a hired claque of union-financed defecators-in-public & peace-disturbers.   

About the level of dropout imbecility to be expected…….

HUFF,

I do believe that is the longest sentence I have ever seen? Your lack of punctuation tends to make your thought(s) rather, incoherent. Ergo, my retort may, or may not reflect your intent? One can only hope.

You couldn’t do it, I reached out, handing you a rational pathway toward conciliation, and you fumbled it. Instead you remain mired in the “Manifesto.” All your response told me is that you want things done your way and only your way! Such is the nature of the zealot, political and religious.

As for my “economic treason thesis need[ing] work,” was your choice of words merely clumsy, or did you intentionally insult me? Moreover, OF COURSE it needs work as it is a philosophical theory and in this instance, only a DEFINITION and brief summary.

Like many revolutionaries you appear to be possessed of a mediocre mind plus much anger and zeal.

The Purveyor of Rhetoric

VOLT,

You, LEE as well as myself, all have our peculiar predilections.  But, we must protect the process, due process and equal protection so we can remain a Nation and culture.

The three of us found common ground last night and I actually feel warm and fuzzy inside!  No kidding.

I truly can’t understand the self centered greed of a Bernie Madoff or Dennis Kozlowski. (TYCO)  Conversely, I don’t understand the Lefts tendency to OVER regulate every facet of life?

I believe that one of the most patriotic endeavors an American can embark upon, is to create a viable business and employ fellow Americans.  Moreover, to do such honestly and fairly with consideration for your Country and employees, paramount.The bounty of successful business is that so many share in the fruits of that labor.  Unfortunately the ethics, necessary for capitalism to function without destroying itself and we with it, are now missing.

We can repair that, however, to destroy such would weaken our Nation.

Purveyor

LEE,

Nice chat we all had last night.  I sent a letter to VOLT which is just below this one.  You might like read it?

Thanks

Actually there HAVE been some unarmed protesters shot. But the police mostly prefer to beat them up with clubs.

Damn homeless people!

Fox News? That’s just as worthless a source. And what’s more, they’re just repeating what the Daily Caller said. Not doing any independent reporting of it.

And when It comes into full effect. How will it hurt you personally?
The death panels?
LOL

No, Fong just posted nonsense. Much like you always do.

No, he most certainly was not the greatest man who ever lived. If he were, he wouldn’t have owned and raped slaves.

I don’t recall ever reading about Jesus engaging in such evil activity.

That’s hilarious. This is about one of the several studies done on Fox news. 
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2011_11/the_most_misinformed_news_cons033634.php

I could go on and on but I won’t let the facts get in the way of your opinion. 
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2009/oct/04/fox-news-inaccuracy-class-itself/

One more for you to read.  And are facts.  
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/opinion/52244297-82/news-fox-leonard-murdoch.html.csp

Oh, I can respond w/well-reasoned factual argument, but won’t bother when people aren’t even at 5th grade level.  Pearls before swine and all that.  Thanks for playing, though.

Hey Frances, 

Try doing your research before writing completely outdated lies. 

You state that Breitbart supports “diversity in the conservative movement.”

Now Frances, i know you like to fawn over Andrew, and paint him in bright rosy colors that he doesnt really deserve, but you might want to update your position on his purported “support for diversity.”

Here’s what we in the gay community know that you do not. 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/11/andrew-breitbart-conservative-activist-goproud_n_1141907.html

See Frances, Breitbart NEVER had any support for diversity or gay people, he just wanted to coopt gay votes for the GOP, and saw GOProud as a way to do that. 

But as soon as those “uppity queens” start questioning the figure-heads on the right, or taking a stand against their bigotry, Breitbart abandons them… probably because he realizes he cant use them the way he wants to. 

Winning votes against Obama at all costs might be job-one for the right (as they explicitly stated over and over again), but reacting to the actual bigotry embedded in the right is far too rich a mixture, eh? 

Remember Frances, Breitbart led a very dishonest, homophobic campaign against Kevin Jennings, and deliberately incited anti-hay hatred (by dishonestly manipulating homophobic fantasies)  in order to try and take down Jennings. 

You KNOW that Frances. And by the way, that kind of behavior is NOT “supportive of diversity.” 

So Frances, while you use this site to repeatedly promote Breitbarts work, and while continue to do so despite the fact that his work has been proven dishonest OVER AND OVER again, please take the time to actually research your editorials before committing them to the site.  

Also, we in the gay community are sick and tired of hetero media activists trying to tell us what we are supposed to think, and who we should consider an ally.  

Your uninformed attempts to paint Breitbart as “supportive of diversity” speak very poorly for your professional practice. 

But I wouldnt expect much more from a site that gave such a generous handijay to Citizens United. 

So you agree with me, yet want to hate me. Okay, then. Whatever.

“According to the American Conservative Union, which organizes CPAC, 55% of attending registrants this year are under 25, a figure that came as little surprise to anyone who saw the masses of conservative youth.”
http://bit.ly/ynhwYz

Those college and high school kids are NOT in the 1%. Those college and high school kids did not pay their own way to travel to D.C., rent hotel rooms, and pay for meals.

Have a nice day.

Is that the best you can come up with? Go back to sleep!

 God Bless, so you are ordering God to bless some creep? How arrogant!

 There are plenty of legit complaints about some OWS camps and behavior. Those shanty towns are going to attract bums and deviants. But Breitbart is utterly cynical and deranged.

 All someone else’s fault, right?

Keystone, while I agree it should be built, I don’t see that decision as promoting hate or violence!

The protestors were not union workers. As well as most of them were not paid

You agree with him because you are a knuckledragger like him

After that inane response, I’ve now lost respect for you…

“He removes the greatest ornament of friendship, who takes away from it respect”

Cicero 70,BC

“Without rape, all OWS has is TB and theft.”

And the Catholic mass is a lot of bells and smells, sprinkles and twinkles, to all that do not share the Catholic faith.  You can use all the specious argument you want to minimize the meaning of a group’s expression.  In doing that, you may change the way those around you see that expression, but in response the expression will become more emphatic and will be unmistakable.  Thank you for helping OWS refine its expression.

If you were homeless and marginally sociable the best possible place to be for comfort, company, opportunity, would be an OWS encampment. In the middle of hostile, remote public space there’s a big lobby party with no doorman and no doors.  If you were homeless and a con artist, you would be down there pretending to be an activist, and you could pass for a while before you got figured out, and you could scan a lot of people at once for vulnerabilities.  I’m surprised there hasn’t been a lot more trouble, and I stay in touch with a lot of people who are more than weekend visitors, and I do hear a few crappy stories of predation.

Oh, please. Get over yourself. I can easily accept that you won’t be my friend, because I never expected your friendship. Apparently, you expect positive reinforcement of everything you say, containing terms with definitions and implications only you provide. Take the constructive criticism or leave it, but don’t be so selfish to believe that it was a rejection of you personally. Sheesh.

“… while yelling the same sentences over and over at a somewhat bewildered crowd will resonate as more evidence that #Occupy is angry and not worth listening to.”

I fixed it for you.

That was not “after the Southern Strategy”. It was before it. The Southern Strategy came after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965 were passed.

Which still hasn’t happened.

NO COMMENT

NO COMMENT

HUFF,

Using a quote, traditionally is a fine method of making, or substantiating a point. However, very seldom is the point perfectly in line with the subject. Regardless, the writer tales a degree of license with a quote by assuming the reader has the needed intellect to make the connection between the quote and subject.

I assume that is obvious to the point of being axiomatic? But, and moreover, the quote can create new thoughts and interpretation within the readers mind, thus, stimulating discourse and spreading new and different ideas.

I always found the quote regarding friendship, by the Roman Jurist, Cicero, to be true as well as profound. In fact, the quote I suggest, is not restricted to, or limited to “friendship.” Rather, most if not all human relationships require “respect” as the anchor or cornerstone. For instance, a husband and wife must have mutual respect. Also, in a work environment, a good boss commands respect, or the shop risks inefficiency? Certainly the military functions on a chain of command however, the commander is granted authority, he/she must earn respect.

HUFF, that you missed, either deliberately, or from ignorance the import of Cicero’s words, tells me much about YOU. The following is a quote from ME. A portion of a piece of writing from 1993:

“Wisdom and knowledge are not always born, solely from the province of success”

I sincerely hope that your mind is capable of cogitating on such and, maybe, expounding on the thought, thus sharing with others?

The Purveyor of Rhetoric

This man was clearly on something. Meth, oxy, cocaine, the works. I’ll be honest, I didn’t predict he would die so soon, but this news doesn’t shock me.