Bill O’Reilly Surprisingly Not A Fan Of Legalizing Prostitution

video

by Drew Grant | 9:09 pm, March 9th, 2010

» 8 comments

Tonight on The O’Reilly Factor, Fox Business’ John Stossel came on the show to talk about legalizing prostitution, as it would allow local government to take a hand in what is thought of as a largely crime and drug-riddled culture. Bill O’Reilly does not think this is the best plan. Things O’Reilly also disagrees with states having a hand in include polygamy and selling your organs.

It’s odd though: O’Reilly’s entire argument is based on “When prostitution is legal, on addicts/underage children will work outside the system.” As opposed to currently, where no system exists (outside Nevada), and the drug addicted child prostitutes are better off?

StewartIII

John Stossel’s a MADMAN! Gotta love ‘em.
The Real Royal King

Has anyone figured out the purpose of this session? It certainly wasn’t news, and it wasn’t particularly interesting unless you live by the Principle. Was this just suppose to be some gratuitous breast shot? (By the way, that’s a metaphor.)
MichelleF

Drew, why would you say Bill is “surprisingly” against it?
m

>why would you say Bill is “surprisingly” against it?

Because he’s a raving sex maniac? Every single show has one or two segments about sex. He’s been caught saying dirty and blatantly inappropriate sex-related things to coworkers. His book “Those Who Trespass” contains explicit material that could only come from someone who spends too much time thinking about elaborate sex situations.
ImNotBlue

The Real Royal King says:
March 10, 2010 at 9:05 am
Has anyone figured out the purpose of this session?

To allow Stossel to argue a point of view that’s different than many people hear. Why do you think that’s a bad thing?

m says:
March 10, 2010 at 11:59 am

Wow… you make up interesting stories. Thanks for this on! It was fun. Almost completely untrue… but fun.
The Real Royal King

Who said it is a bad thing to argue and hear different points of view? There is no newsworthiness to any of what was said, and there is certainly a salacious element to it all. Sort of like watching an MSNBC lock-up “documentary” …. It seems an odd choice for a cable “news” program. Don’t be so prickly.
MichelleF

M, Did you vote for Clinton? Just curious.
ImNotBlue

The Real Royal King says:
March 10, 2010 at 3:06 pm

Who said it is a bad thing to argue and hear different points of view?

You did, when you asked: “Has anyone figured out the purpose of this session?”

It’s an issue… a held belief by a significant amount of people. Why not talk about it?