As he should. O’Hannity porn, pure and simple. I’m sure he’s spent after every viewing.

Listen you idiots here!…She seems like a good person….is that why you libs hate her?

Gasp! Did she actually suggest that she shared the wealth as Governor of Alaska? Joe the Plumber must be livid!

Sharing the wealth with the people who own the product being sold isn’t socialism.

(Pssst: Read the sentence before she uses that phrase.)

Paul G said:
Listen you idiots here!…She seems like a good person….is that why you libs hate her?

or because she DIDN’T say 57 states…..

THE REAL RABID KOOK said:
As he should. O’Hannity porn, pure and simple. I’m sure he’s spent after every viewing.

Are projecting your existence onto Hannity, Kook?

Robertthe RealRoyalKing says . I apologize to Governor Palin for every horrible thing I have said about her and her children .

RobertThe RealRoyalKing ® signing off . The noble talkshow giant Ed Schultz has awakened in me something I have been missing since I was a young beauty school student – shame . Yes , I am ashamed of all my vile hate-filled diatribes against people who don’t think as I do . My sickening habit of expressing hatred for and very weird interest in Sarah Palin’s CHILDREN has finally made me realize what a filthy old coot I am . I hereby take myself off the Internet for one week . I will close the salon and BFD and I will roam the streets of Austin . BFD will do some of his panhandling whilst I will stand on streetcorners and preach civility to all who will listen . I have warned BFD : no picking pockets ! Or at least , split it with me . ©

Come on Sarah, in or out. The suspense is boring us to death.

She’s been defeated so many times, it beggars belief that this moron would get away with such a headline.

I noted that the new Gallup poll out today has her at #2, just behind Romney and way ahead of any other contender. And she hasn’t even declared yet.

Be afraid, lefties. Be very afraid.

Heh.

skyfet said:
She’s been defeated so many times, it beggars belief that this moron would get away with such a headline.

Been defeated?….by who? The LSM….you’re a smart guy sky….THINK!!!

Paul G said:
Listen you idiots here!…She seems like a good person….is that why you libs hate her?

She is an intellectual and ethical nightmare. She is a horrible parent. She is thoroughly self-absorbed and self-indulgent. That is a good person, how?

Paul G said:
Been defeated?….by who? The LSM….you’re a smart guy sky….THINK!!!

The last time I saw her on Gretta (Palin’s BFF), she was told to stop whining and toughen up. That to me is someone whose been beaten down, and the only fighting back is to cry foul before anything happens.

Pablo said:
Are projecting your existence onto Hannity, Kook?

No. I don’t find trashy pretty not arousing.

Harry Flashman said:
I noted that the new Gallup poll out today has her at #2, just behind Romney and way ahead of any other contender. And she hasn’t even declared yet.

Be afraid, lefties. Be very afraid.

Heh.

That is among Republicans. Republicans likely to vote in primaries. An extremist group. And, while she may be #2 this week, her numbers are far from impressive. Among all American voters, she seldom breaks 30% Palin is not fearsome, she is a blessing.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
No. I don’t find trashy pretty not arousing.

nor

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
No. I don’t find trashy pretty not arousing.

what?

skyfet said:
The last time I saw her on Gretta (Palin’s BFF), she was told to stop whining and toughen up. That to me is someone whose been beaten down, and the only fighting back is to cry foul before anything happens.

Wow….that’s what you got?….come towards the light…..

Sounds like a socialist.

And remember, the King goes to church. Must be like Obama. He’s attending, but he’s not really listening.

seek said:
what?

Get the coffee!

writer said:
And remember, the King goes to church. Must be like Obama. He’s attending, but he’s not really listening.

When was the last time you were in a Church?

skyfet, I’m not the one flinging hate filled diatribes towards someone’s children, just because I disagree with their politics.

Harry Flashman said:
I noted that the new Gallup poll out today has her at #2, just behind Romney and way ahead of any other contender. And she hasn’t even declared yet.

Be afraid, lefties. Be very afraid.

Heh.

Yeah! they are very afraid. I remember The Donald being #1 a couple of weeks ago. Oh, or do you just refer to the polls when it suits your narrative? Selective amnesia, I assume.

writer said:
skyfet, I’m not the one flinging hate filled diatribes towards someone’s children, just because I disagree with their politics.

Take it up with them, why tell me. Also, don’t forget the folks from the right who did the same to Hillary and her daughter.

sky…I’ve always treated you with respect. You can’t see where you’re wrong?

The abuse and heinous comments that Palin and her family have been subjected to fall far beyond the realm of political insults. They have been the foulest against a female politician and her family ever seen. To accuse her of being thin skinned is comparable to you having a double root canal without anaesthetic. She has had the hide of a Momma Grizzly and now you’ve made the Grizzly mad. There is no way that she can ever trust the media to give her a fair shake – just won’t happen. The vengeance that you guys exhibited to get rid of her is beyond comparison ever.

Since you won’t accept responsibility for the left having done that – there is no point in even having a discussion with you about her.

skyfet:

“Yeah! they are very afraid. I remember The Donald being #1 a couple of weeks ago. Oh, or do you just refer to the polls when it suits your narrative? Selective amnesia, I assume”

Nope, no selective amnesia.

I said then that Trump’s high poll numbers were a flash in the pan and that he would get out, and then those numbers would shift to someone else.

TAH – DAH!!!!!!

I love being right. It’s a character flaw.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
intellectual and ethical nightmare

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
horrible parent

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
thoroughly self-absorbed and self-indulgent. That is a good person, how?

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
trashy

Amen says Robert .

seek said:
The abuse and heinous comments that Palin and her family have been subjected to fall far beyond the realm of political insults. They have been the foulest against a female politician and her family ever seen. To accuse her of being thin skinned is comparable to you having a double root canal without anaesthetic. She has had the hide of a Momma Grizzly and now you’ve made the Grizzly mad. There is no way that she can ever trust the media to give her a fair shake – just won’t happen. The vengeance that you guys exhibited to get rid of her is beyond comparison ever.

Since you won’t accept responsibility for the left having done that – there is no point in even having a discussion with you about her.

Any candidate for president needs the media. No candidate can be elected with wide-spread media attention and coverage. No candidate can make it to Washington without the media. And, FOX “News” isn’t going to get Palin from Scottsdale to Washington. I doubt it can get her to the New Mexico line.

yawn, who cares really. She is not interesting to me. I am fascinated by people that follow her though…

Fact: Mention Sarah Palin and the liberals start doing the tuna. Thats flopping around on the floor like a fish out of water. hahahahahahahah……..

When I said:

“I noted that the new Gallup poll out today has her at #2, just behind Romney and way ahead of any other contender. And she hasn’t even declared yet.”

King said:

“That is among Republicans. Republicans likely to vote in primaries. An extremist group”

Wow. I wonder if a poll of Democrats would have Obama somewhere bear the top. Those Democrats are likely to vote in primaries, you know.

Spin, Dorothy, spin!!! Aunty Em! Aunty Em!

Watching the left meltdown over Palin will be the best show since Ringling Brothers.

Paul G said:
sky…I’ve always treated you with respect. You can’t see where you’re wrong?

I’m sorry to be the one that bust your bubble, but Sarah is done (Politically). She is as unpopular in Alaska as she is in the entire country, trust me, its 2011, 2008 election passed awhile ago.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Any candidate for president needs the media. No candidate can be elected with wide-spread media attention and coverage. No candidate can make it to Washington without the media. And, FOX “News” isn’t going to get Palin from Scottsdale to Washington. I doubt it can get her to the New Mexico line.

Fact: What about George Bush 2nd term? Media was for his opponent. Again another swing and a miss.

FOX NEWS ALERT !

President King Obama wishes to let the American people know that he is closely monitoring the Shultz situation , and may cut his vacation short to return to the Colonies to deal with it . While he admits what Shultz said about Miss Ingraham is deplorable , the Ed audience is suffering and the King is considering some sort of absolution to get Shultz back on the air . The first Lady would like to make it clear that she agrees with Ed .

Looks like Sarah Palin is paying her kids to post comments again … yawn.

As for the Title of this film “Undefeated” … it’s a falsehood.

Palin HAS been defeated:
1) 2002 – she was defeated when she ran for public office on the state level.

2) 2008 – she was defeated at the national level when she & McCain LOST in a landslide election.

3) 2009 – she was defeated & deflated when she quit mid-term as Governor because she could not handle the job

skyfet, anyone who made fun of Chelsea was wrong. So now you’ll also admit that it’s wrong the way the King attacks the Palin kids. Correct?

writer said:
skyfet, anyone who made fun of Chelsea was wrong. So now you’ll also admit that it’s wrong the way the King attacks the Palin kids. Correct?

I don’t attack Palin kids.

Harry Flashman said:
Watching the left meltdown over Palin will be the best show since Ringling Brothers.

Watching the TeaKlanbaggies meltdown after Palin loses will be a better show to watch than the one you are watching.

skyfet, I said the King does that. And since you think it was wrong to attack Chelsea, you must also think it’s wrong for the King to attack Palin’s kids. Yes or no?

skyfet said:
2008 election passed awhile ago.

King Obama thinks it’s coming up this November .

Just4thefax said:
THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Any candidate for president needs the media. No candidate can be elected with wide-spread media attention and coverage. No candidate can make it to Washington without the media. And, FOX “News” isn’t going to get Palin from Scottsdale to Washington. I doubt it can get her to the New Mexico line.

Fact: What about George Bush 2nd term? Media was for his opponent. Again another swing and a miss.

Idiot. I’m not saying endorse. I’m saying cover. W was widely covered. On and in all the media.

The Lantern of Truth said:
King Obama

Your jealousy of President Obama makes me smile.

Harry Flashman said:
. I wonder if a poll of Democrats would have Obama somewhere bear the top.

President Obama is unopposed in the Democratic race. Your example is silly.

After screeching her way through her convention speech, she was all but hidden from the national press. After Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric finally got a chance to interview her, the entire country understood why. The McCain/Palin campaign was a disaster culminating in quite the historic defeat. I lay this out to try and understand just why some people think we Liberals are afraid of her? She’s an empty headed hillbilly who couldn’t cut it as govenor which has me curious about the title of this movie. The Undefeated? Surely the person we were told repeatedly was the one bringing the energy and the crowds must also share the blame for the agony of a crushing defeat? As she implied recently, perhaps she really does believe that if she were at the top of the ticket, they would have won. Now, she’ll get the chance to see just how wrong she was. Or is she simply looking to grift more coin from the same yokels who bought this act last time around? This is going to be fun for Liberals and further embarrassment for Palin and her supporters. Just watch!

donalan said:
I am fascinated by people that follow her though…

Unfortunately, I seldom make it to WalMart.

Whether she runs or not is immaterial. What’s absolutely relevant though is the reaction just the mention of her name has on the Chicago Jesus lovin’ disciples here & at Kos & Huff-n-puff.

Just her name in an article. That boys and girls is power.

An innoccuous remark like “Sarah Palin went to the store today” will send people like TRRK off on a 4 or 5 comment tangent. That says it all.

Odd how the King never mentions other women who have careers and also have children. Isn’t Angelina Jolie a terrible parent for having small children, yet traveling all over the world making movies? How about women CEOs? Women in the military? It seems the woman’s politics is the main factor on whether or not she’s a ‘good parent’.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Any candidate for president needs the media. No candidate can be elected with wide-spread media attention and coverage. No candidate can make it to Washington without the media. And, FOX “News” isn’t going to get Palin from Scottsdale to Washington. I doubt it can get her to the New Mexico line.

Just4thefax said:
Fact: What about George Bush 2nd term? Media was for his opponent. Again another swing and a miss.

Hey Just4theFacts – Maybe you forgot your reading comprehension skills? Re-read King’s words, King was correct in that no one will make it to the White House without WIDE SPREAD MEDIA coverage. That would include interviews beyond Fox.

George W Bush did not limit his interviews to Fox – W was open to ALL media outlet. Palin can not handle the questions any media outlet except Fox – who gives her their questions in advance.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Unfortunately, I seldom make it to WalMart.

How typically high-brow of you.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Unfortunately, I seldom make it to WalMart.

Robert still banned at Walmart for his activities near the fitting rooms .

Millions of avid, devoted Sarah Palin fans are excited, delighted, & united in happy anticipation at the thought of watching our glamour-girl Governor & inspirational idol on the big silver screen at the local multiplex. Sarah is already a superstar.

As Sarah would say, Game On! I think she’s in, and wow, will she ever more turn a lackluster GOP field on its head. I can see heads exploding now – but not where you think. They will be exploding amongst the GOP establishment elites, who’ve spent too much time sitting on their butts inside the Beltway. They long ago took a look at how she polled with independents, and they wrote her off. She’s not running, they say. She hasn’t gotten her ticked punched and checked the right boxes that “conventional” GOP candidates are supposed to do. Well, Sarah has NEVER done anything in a conventional manner, and she won’t start now.

As far as her polling numbers, she can overcome that. Most independents have probably only heard a few soundbites about her and have bought into that caricature of her. That can change if she runs and is able to get her message and her record in front of the people. This is going to be fun :)

timzank said:
“Sarah Palin went to the store today”

Was it Saks Fifth Avenue or Neiman-Marcus?

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Unfortunately, I seldom make it to WalMart.

Robert applied to be a greeter at South Austin Walmart .

The tryout did not go well . He thought he was supposed to insult each customer coming in .

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
timzank said:
“Sarah Palin went to the store today”

Was it Saks Fifth Avenue or Neiman-Marcus?

Did she pay for it or did she use an RNC credit card, again?

King you keep saying that Palin is a “bad” parent. You got so hot under the collar (or table) that you blathered “No. I don’t find trashy pretty not arousing.” In other words – you’ve now double negatived yourself.

I don’t want Palin for Pres. , but I sure don’t have a hate on for the woman and her children. The hatchet job on her is so over the top that it’s incomprehensible for normal people to even respond in kind. It’s just the height of ignorance on the left’s part and I can’t understand why they keep doing it. It’s like “let’s hit our heads against the wall to get rid of our headache – God, let’s keep doing it, it feels so good”. Just stupid.

The King is too arrogant to go to any kind of store. He just stays secluded in his house, Howard Hughes-like, growing twelve inch fingernails and wearing Kleenex boxes on his feet.

timzank said:
Whether she runs or not is immaterial. What’s absolutely relevant though is the reaction just the mention of her name has on the Chicago Jesus lovin’ disciples here & at Kos & Huff-n-puff.

Just her name in an article. That boys and girls is power.

An innoccuous remark like “Sarah Palin went to the store today” will send people like TRRK off on a 4 or 5 comment tangent. That says it all.

Did she buy Cessna another designer purse?

Trump/Palin 2 peas in a pod!! Both need constant attention, will do anything to get it….It is their brands they are concerned with..neither could ever be seriously considered for President or ever will be!! She might have had a chance several years ago, but the public doesn’t have any respect for her, and with all the emails and one of her own staff coming out, she’s done—- stick a fork in her, no matter what she decides, we have all ready wrote the ending for her!! She may continue to ride out the pop culture dollars, just like Trump..but neither will go any further than that….

writer said:
Odd how the King never mentions other women who have careers and also have children. Isn’t Angelina Jolie a terrible parent for having small children, yet traveling all over the world making movies? How about women CEOs? Women in the military? It seems the woman’s politics is the main factor on whether or not she’s a ‘good parent’.

Odd how you want King to trash other horrible mothers at the same time he/she highlights Palin’s horrible parenting skills. Why should list all horrible mothers when this article is only about one woman, Palin, who is a horrible mother. That is just a fact, she’s a horrible mother.

Palin takes her kids out of school to go on political speeches with her – that’s bad parenting. Her kids should be in school.

Palin’s prances her kids around in front of the press & then expects no one to mention them. Not only is Angelina Jolie NOT part of this article, Angelina Jolie does NOT prance her kids around in front of the press – which is why no one talks about her kids.

It is so simple, if Paling does not want people to talk about her kids THEN: she should leave them OUT of the lime light.

You see, truth is, Palin does NOT want people to stop talking about her kids. Do you know why?
Answer: Because Palin uses her kids as pawns and when Palin says illogical, uneducated ignorant comments she can deflect her own ignorance and say, “People talk about my kids & criticize me – wah wah” -

It’s called “DEFLECTION” … Palin wants to deflect from her own blatant ignorance & uses her kids to achieve that goal.

timzank said:
Whether she runs or not is immaterial. What’s absolutely relevant though is the reaction just the mention of her name has on the Chicago Jesus lovin’ disciples here & at Kos & Huff-n-puff.

Just her name in an article. That boys and girls is power.

An innoccuous remark like “Sarah Palin went to the store today” will send people like TRRK off on a 4 or 5 comment tangent. That says it all.

More silk boxers for Todd?

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Unfortunately, I seldom make it to WalMart.

Robert claims to prefer the Kwik Possum convenience store next to his and BFD’s boardinghouse anyway .

His Frequent Slurpee card can only be punched at the KP.

Palin’s flick is going to play in theaters … hmm … how much money is Palin projecting she will earn off of her ‘acting debut”

Palin is all about money … this is one more scam where she wants to make more money —- I predict it will be a Box Office FLOP

keepemhonest said:
Palin, who is a horrible mother. That is just a fact, she’s a horrible mother

And keepemhonest is a moron. That is just a fact, he’s a moron,.

timzank said:
Whether she runs or not is immaterial. What’s absolutely relevant though is the reaction just the mention of her name has on the Chicago Jesus lovin’ disciples here & at Kos & Huff-n-puff.

Just her name in an article. That boys and girls is power.

An innoccuous remark like “Sarah Palin went to the store today” will send people like TRRK off on a 4 or 5 comment tangent. That says it all.

When is she not going to return the items she bought?

keepemhonest, I suppose you’re the type who goes to Little League games and hurls insults at the kids. After all, they’re ‘out there’ in public, so they’re ‘fair game’ for the most vile insults you can throw at them. Saying that kids appearing in public gives you the license to be hateful and arrogant to them, you and the King are certainly in agreement.

Azarkhan said:
And keepemhonest is a moron. That is just a fact, he’s a moron,.

Hey, I gave a few FACTUAL examples of why Palin IS a horrible mother — and the best you could do is post rhetoric … {{{yawn}}}

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Idiot. I’m not saying endorse. I’m saying cover. W was widely covered. On and in all the media.

Fact: Cover? How was his National Guard duties? swoosh…….

writer said:
keepemhonest, I suppose you’re the type who goes to Little League games and hurls insults at the kids. After all, they’re ‘out there’ in public, so they’re ‘fair game’ for the most vile insults you can throw at them. Saying that kids appearing in public gives you the license to be hateful and arrogant to them, you and the King are certainly in agreement.

No, I do not yell at kids who are playing in Little League games. Why should I?

I don’t yell at Palin’s kids when she prances them around the media during HER political speeches etc.

Why would you ask me such a ridiculous question anyway?

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Unfortunately, I seldom make it to WalMart.

Robert still ticked off about the cracker who keyed his ’63 Valiant ( with Mondale ’84 sticker ) in Walmart parking lot . Just because he parked in a handicapped spot and pretended to limp into the store .

Okay, it’s been long enough. keepemhonest is RRK. He does this frequently. A new name pops up, and the newbie is, surprise!, in complete agreement with the King. He then proceeds to do a double team on any conservative posting. Old news.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
President Obama is unopposed in the Democratic race. Your example is silly.

Obama is unopposed for two reasons:

1. There is not a single, honest Democrat who would be willing to admit that Obama is a disaster, and
2. Because any Democrat with such temerity would be called RACIST and reviled more than any Republican.

keepemhonest said:
Odd how you want King to trash other horrible mothers at the same time he/she highlights Palin’s horrible parenting skills. Why should list all horrible mothers when this article is only about one woman, Palin, who is a horrible mother. That is just a fact, she’s a horrible mother.

Palin takes her kids out of school to go on political speeches with her – that’s bad parenting. Her kids should be in school.

Palin’s prances her kids around in front of the press & then expects no one to mention them. Not only is Angelina Jolie NOT part of this article, Angelina Jolie does NOT prance her kids around in front of the press – which is why no one talks about her kids.

It is so simple, if Paling does not want people to talk about her kids THEN: she should leave them OUT of the lime light.

You see, truth is, Palin does NOT want people to stop talking about her kids. Do you know why?
Answer: Because Palin uses her kids as pawns and when Palin says illogical, uneducated ignorant comments she can deflect her own ignorance and say, “People talk about my kids & criticize me – wah wah” -

It’s called “DEFLECTION” … Palin wants to deflect from her own blatant ignorance & uses her kids to achieve that goal.

Oh where to start. When Palin was “prancing her children around on stage” so was Obama. You had no trouble with that. Oh, you mean she was “prancing” her son with down’s around on the stage and you were very, very uncomfortable with that. If she had left him in the dressing room you would have accused her of being ashamed of her son. With you guys it was lose lose whichever way she went. There was no outcry from you about David Bedwetter making an obscene joke about one of her kids – it was just fine – the stupid kid deserved it. There she was taking up space at a baseball game – how dare she.

Just take a look at your souls and give the hate a rest. It’s a heavy burden to carry day in day out.

writer said:
keepemhonest, … Saying that kids appearing in public gives you the license to be hateful and arrogant to them, you and the King are certainly in agreement.

Hey writer, you fail reading comprehension.

I never said, “kids appearing in public gives you the license to be hateful and arrogant to them” Why are you lying about what I wrote?

I am hoping against hope that Palin is nominated. Not only will it spell a Johnson-Goldwater-style landslide for Barack, it will provide some of the most hilarious comedy this side of W.C. Fields as Palin’s idiocy goes up against the genius of Obama. Go Sarah!!! Bring it on home! “Undefeated”? Dream on, girl.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Any candidate for president needs the media. No candidate can be elected with wide-spread media attention and coverage. No candidate can make it to Washington without the media. And, FOX “News” isn’t going to get Palin from Scottsdale to Washington. I doubt it can get her to the New Mexico line.

Well, NO conservative candidate has EVER had the media on their side. As far as media attention, she’s get plenty, but she doesn’t need to play the left-wing media game to get the GOP nomination. If she gets the nomination, she will do some MSM, and believe me, they’ll want access. Sarah learned a lot in 2008, and believe me, there will be conditions – mainly concerned how she’s edited.

The most despicable thing I’ve seen in so-called journalism was her ABC interview with Charlie Gibson. When you read the entire transcript and take a look at what ABC aired, you see that they did a cut-and-paste job on her to put her in the worst possible light. Many knowledgeable things she said in her answers were cut, and they even pasted stuff from one place to another to make it look like she wanted to go to war with Russia. She’ll never let that crap happen again.

keepemhonest said:
Palin’s flick is going to play in theaters … hmm … how much money is Palin projecting she will earn off of her ‘acting debut”

Palin is all about money … this is one more scam where she wants to make more money —- I predict it will be a Box Office FLOP

Every political figure needs money to keep doing what they do. Every one of them – why do you Obama is on the circuit. Oh, you figure she should pay for it all herself. I see….

keepemhonest said:
horrible mother

keepemhonest said:
horrible mother

keepemhonest said:
horrible mothers

keepemhonest said:
horrible mothers

keepemhonest said:
horrible parenting

Speaking of mothers …

keepemhonest said:
Hey, I gave a few FACTUAL examples

You give nothing by lies and smears. You and King are complete a-holes. You think you are clever and smart but in reality you are just two arrogant, tired, old white leftists who regurgitate the same vomit with every comment.

seek said:
Oh where to start. When Palin was “prancing her children around on stage” so was Obama. You had no trouble with that. Oh, you mean she was “prancing” her son with down’s around on the stage and you were very, very uncomfortable with that. If she had left him in the dressing room you would have accused her of being ashamed of her son. With you guys it was lose lose whichever way she went. There was no outcry from you about David Bedwetter making an obscene joke about one of her kids – it was just fine – the stupid kid deserved it. There she was taking up space at a baseball game – how dare she.

Just take a look at your souls and give the hate a rest. It’s a heavy burden to carry day in day out.

No, President Obama did NOT take his kids on the campaign trail and prance them around on the stage … you are posting a false, untruthful comment when you post that.

No, I am not uncomfortable when she brought her youngest son on stage – why would you even falsely post that I would be uncomfortable about that?

Your comment that I would have complained if she had left her little boy in a dressing room is absurd

I don’t know who David Bedwetter so I can’t comment on if his joke was funny or not.

You sure do post a lot of lies about what other posters write.

writer said:
keepemhonest is RRK

Yes ! That makes 27 aliases .

keepemhonest said:
No, President Obama did NOT take his kids on the campaign trail and prance them around on the stage … you are posting a false, untruthful comment when you post that.

No, I am not uncomfortable when she brought her youngest son on stage – why would you even falsely post that I would be uncomfortable about that?

Your comment that I would have complained if she had left her little boy in a dressing room is absurd

I don’t know who David Bedwetter so I can’t comment on if his joke was funny or not.

You sure do post a lot of lies about what other posters write.

Bull crap my good sir – absolute bull crap. Keep it coming, it seems to be getting your blood pressure to the point where you can even stand up without fainting.

The Lantern of Truth said:
Robert applied to be a greeter at South Austin Walmart .
The tryout did not go well . He thought he was supposed to insult each customer coming in .

Was it the nicknames he assigned each customer , or the couture commentary that did him in ?

Azarkhan said:
You give nothing by lies and smears. You and King are complete a-holes. You think you are clever and smart but in reality you are just two arrogant, tired, old white leftists who regurgitate the same vomit with every comment.

No, I did not give lies & smears. I gave facts. I gave FACTS on why Palin is a horrible parent.

Palin takes her children out of school just so she can prance them around on a stage with her … that IS HORRIBLE parenting. That makes Palin a HORRIBLE parent.

Kids should be in school learning … they should not have UNEXCUSED absences, missing valuable information, just so their mother can prance them around on stage with her so she can use them as political pawns and deflect from her own ignorance.

Why are you lying about what I wrote?

King, that’s one of your favorite lines. Like I’ve said, when you change names you should at least change the dialogue a little bit.

seek said:
Bull crap my good sir – absolute bull crap. Keep it coming, it seems to be getting your blood pressure to the point where you can even stand up without fainting.

huh? Your comment is absurd.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Unfortunately, I seldom make it to WalMart.

Robert’s domestic partner BFD also banned at Walmart .

He thought those moistened towelettes they have to wipe the cart handles were an invitation for him to take a complete bath .

The Lantern of Truth said:
Yes ! That makes 27 aliases .

No, you are wrong … but hey think what you want deary

“Palin is a horrible parent!”

Yep, doesn’t sound a thing like the King. Totally different.

keepemhonest said:
Watching the TeaKlanbaggies

Wow. Only three words to show yourself as a useless ignoramus. That’s impressive…for a useless ignoramus. A

keepemhonest said:
No, I did not give lies & smears. I gave facts.

Here’s a fact. The next time I need to p*ss and can’t find a urinal, I’ll give you a call. That’s all you’re good for.

writer said:
Why are you lying about what I wrote?

King, that’s one of your favorite lines. Like I’ve said, when you change names you should at least change the dialogue a little bit.

You can think what you want about my pen name. If you want to see more of what I write online please feel free to googl my pen name – I’ve had for many years.

As for my question to you, “Why are you lying about what I wrote?”
1) You did not answer my question
2) If I am not the only poster asking you that same question, you must have a reputation for lying about what people write.

keepemhonest said:
Palin takes her children out of school just so she can prance them around on a stage with her … that IS HORRIBLE parenting. That makes Palin a HORRIBLE parent.

Oh, like the Obamas!

keepemhonest said:
Palin’s flick is going to play in theaters … hmm … how much money is Palin projecting she will earn off of her ‘acting debut”

Palin is all about money … this is one more scam where she wants to make more money —- I predict it will be a Box Office FLOP

Palin is all about money? She does more free events than you think. But I’m sure you’re also offended by Obama writing two autobiographies early in his career, becoming a millionaire, and signing “another” book deal BEFORE he entered the oval office.

The left in the country fears this strong woman, and with good reason. The slander she has endured, the false information that has been published about her, the united front of a so-called “news” group that attacked her as a bad mother, the permitted misogyn and the silence of NOW on the numerous attacks on her as a woman and a mother, the whole trig truther bs, and the lies put out there by Katie, CBS by not ever showing the full interview….and yet she still stands tall and strong.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Unfortunately, I seldom make it to WalMart.

Robert has to send the salon manicurist , skyfet , in to buy nail polish .

Really doesn’t work though .

skyfet gets lost , can’t communicate what he wants and usually winds up in the magazine section , coloring a coloring book with his tongue hanging out .

Pablo said:
Wow. Only three words to show yourself as a useless ignoramus. That’s impressive…for a u

Azarkhan said:
Here’s a fact. The next time I need to p*ss and can’t find a urinal, I’ll give you a call. That’s all you’re good for.

No, not like the Obamas. President Obama did not take his kids out of school to prance around a campaign stage with him. President Obama’s kids stayed IN SCHOOL where they belonged.

President Obama does not ever prance his kids on stage with him when he travels the country – his kids stay in school – where all kids belong during the school year.

I find it so funny when you teaklanbaggies post comments that reflect your jealousy of President Obama by your lies.

Nicely done, keepmeincoherent!

TfT said:
The left in the country fears this strong woman, and with good reason. The slander she has endured, the false information that has been published about her, the united front of a so-called “news” group that attacked her as a bad mother, the permitted misogyn and the silence of NOW on the numerous attacks on her as a woman and a mother, the whole trig truther bs, and the lies put out there by Katie, CBS by not ever showing the full interview….and yet she still stands tall and strong.

Slander? Do you know the definition of the word, “slander”

Sarah Palin has never been slandered.

I don’t think the left is afraid of a “strong woman” … I think you are making that up.

Pablo said:
Oh, like the Obamas!

No, not like the Obamas. President Obama did not take his kids out of school to prance around a campaign stage with him. President Obama’s kids stayed IN SCHOOL where they belonged.

President Obama does not ever prance his kids on stage with him when he travels the country – his kids stay in school – where all kids belong during the school year.

I find it so funny when you teaklanbaggies post comments that reflect your jealousy of President Obama by your lies.

keepemhonest said:
You can think what you want about my pen name. If you want to see more of what I write online please feel free to googl my pen name – I’ve had for many years.

As for my question to you, “Why are you lying about what I wrote?”
1) You did not answer my question
2) If I am not the only poster asking you that same question, you must have a reputation for lying about what people write.

Your questions have been answered. You just don’t like the answer, so you pretend it hasn’t been.

Palin “paraded” with children when all the other candidates “paraded” with children. She has a Daughter who made a mistake (which Obama’s Mother did also), but she didn’t marry the doofus (Obama’s Mother married someone who was still married). This pissed off everyone on the left because “damn it – we’ve given Women choices (and they chose and we didn’t like the kid’s choice).

Anything else I can clear up for you?

George C said:
Was it the nicknames he assigned each customer , or the couture commentary that did him in ?

Both . Also the crown he was wearing while smoking with a cigarette holder and cackling like Phyllis
Diller .

TfT said:
…. the lies put out there by Katie, CBS by not ever showing the full interview.

Ok, I’ll take your bait, please do give us the transcript of what you claim CBS left out of the full interview.

I’ll wait.

This piece is a good example of the clunky writing that plagues Mediaite.

Consider the lede sentence: “Real Clear Politics reported yesterday that a documentary on the career of Sarah Palin was not only in the works, but was planning to be released in theaters this summer…in Iowa.”

Try parsing that. It says, in effect, that the “documentary…was planning to be released in theaters.”

I never realized that a film, an inanimate object, is capable of “planning.”

You guys need a good editor or two. Make me a six-figure offer, and I’ll be glad to consider it.

keepemhonest said:
Ok, I’ll take your bait, please do give us the transcript of what you claim CBS left out of the full interview.

I’ll wait.

do a google if you are so interested. I’m still picturing Charlie with his bifocals on the end of his nose, sneering his questions at her. You notice he didn’t need them when interviewing Obama (cause they were sharing the telepromter I guess).

Poor Charlie – where is he btw?

teleprompter*

Sorry keepem; CBS has never released the transcriptof the full interview, despite Palin’s requests on numerous occasions. Just go do some surfing on what Palin had to say…given we know that CBS has edited and been caught presenting false information from interviews with republicans (specifically, Bush and Pelly, if memory serves me correctly).

Palin and many others have requested CBS release the full interview; CBS scoffed and refused to do so. They are hiding/spiking the truth, it is what they do. CBS and Katie are NEVER to be trusted.

The Lantern of Truth said:
Both . Also the crown he was wearing while smoking with a cigarette holder and cackling like Phyllis
Diller .

Altogether , not hard to imagine .

seek said:
Your questions have been answered. You just don’t like the answer, so you pretend it hasn’t been.

Palin “paraded” with children when all the other candidates “paraded” with children. She has a Daughter who made a mistake (which Obama’s Mother did also), but she didn’t marry the doofus (Obama’s Mother married someone who was still married). This pissed off everyone on the left because “damn it – we’ve given Women choices (and they chose and we didn’t like the kid’s choice).

Anything else I can clear up for you?

Seek, actually you did NOT answer my question. You have NOT answered why YOU lie about what I actually post.

Why do you do that?

BTW: Palin is the first candidate for national office to ever take her kids out of school for 3 months just so they could prance around on a campaign stage.

I never brought up her daughter who made a mistake & got pregnant up out of wed lock – so – why are YOU bringing that up?

Why do you want to talk about her daughter who got pregnant out of wed lock?

Why do you think that’s a big deal?

Are you angry that her daughter made a mistake? Do you think her daughter’s pregnancy out of wed lock is something you & should discuss?

seek said:
do a google if you are so interested. I’m still picturing Charlie with his bifocals on the end of his nose, sneering his questions at her. You notice he didn’t need them when interviewing Obama (cause they were sharing the telepromter I guess). Poor Charlie – where is he btw?

Charlie is probably getting paid to pontificate at various colleges. What a frickin hack he is, he’d fit right in with academia.

TfT said:
Sorry keepem; CBS has never released the transcriptof the full interview, despite Palin’s requests on numerous occasions. Just go do some surfing on what Palin had to say…given we know that CBS has edited and been caught presenting false information from interviews with republicans (specifically, Bush and Pelly, if memory serves me correctly).

Palin and many others have requested CBS release the full interview; CBS scoffed and refused to do so. They are hiding/spiking the truth, it is what they do. CBS and Katie are NEVER to be trusted.

Look, you said CBS did not air the full interview so I asked you to post some sort of transcript that CBS left out … and apparently you can not.

Just because YOU say they did doesn’t mean they did.

So, since you think they did – the least you could do is tell me what they left out?

keepemhonest said:
BTW: Palin is the first candidate for national office to ever take her kids out of school for 3 months just so they could prance around on a campaign stage.

I find that awfully hard to believe, do you have a link for that?

keepemhonest, you saying ‘you’re lying’ is just like you always saying ‘Palin is a horrible parent’. It’s one of your tag lines. Next you’ll be saying we all eat Cheetos and live in trailers. But your ‘hey, this isn’t me’ protests are amusing.

keepemhonest said:
Seek, actually you did NOT answer my question. You have NOT answered why YOU lie about what I actually post.

Why do you do that?

BTW: Palin is the first candidate for national office to ever take her kids out of school for 3 months just so they could prance around on a campaign stage.

I never brought up her daughter who made a mistake & got pregnant up out of wed lock – so – why are YOU bringing that up?

Why do you want to talk about her daughter who got pregnant out of wed lock?

Why do you think that’s a big deal?

Are you angry that her daughter made a mistake? Do you think her daughter’s pregnancy out of wed lock is something you & should discuss?

what have i “lied” about? You don’t like my answers, so they are a lie? lol
You really are a piece of work. You don’t care about Palin and yet you and your bud are in here posting like crazy about a woman who you dislike. Most “norma” people steer away from people they dislike. Not you boy!

I don’t think any of its a big deal. I just know exactly where you guys are coming from and what the real reasons are for your hate. It is absolutely transparent (guess Obama taught us all how to be transparent).

Next….

keepemhonest said:
Look, you said CBS did not air the full interview so I asked you to post some sort of transcript that CBS left out … and apparently you can not.

Just because YOU say they did doesn’t mean they did.

So, since you think they did – the least you could do is tell me what they left out?

At the time of the interview, there were many, many reports about how Palin’s words were twisted and used. I guess the CBS clean-up committee didn’t appreciate that. Find old articles (I know its tough and I’m being honest, it is tough).

keepemhonest said:
BTW: Palin is the first candidate for national office to ever take her kids out of school for 3 months just so they could prance around on a campaign stage.

McCain picked Palin on August 29. The election was on November 4. If you can’t even count, why should we think you capable of further analysis?

Palin 2012! Can’t wait till she is president. How can people endorse a failure like Obama is beyond me.

Here is a small portion:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/09/13/abc-news-edited-out-key-parts-sarah-palin-interview

Seriously, Palin made a movie about herself called “The Undefeated”? Well, at least she’s marginally easier on the eyes than Kim Jong Il.

timzank said:
I find that awfully hard to believe, do you have a link for that?

Your question to me is a bit absurd. I posted, “Palin is the first candidate for national office to ever take her kids out of school for 3 months just so they could prance around on a campaign stage.”

Here is how I would answer your question – NO candidate for VP or President has ever taken their kids out of school for 3 months so that they (the kids) could prance around on campaign stages UNTIL Sarah Palin ran for VP

So, my question for you … can you post a link showing where any other candidate for VP took their kids out of school for 3 months so the candidate for VP could prance their kids around campaign stages like Sarah Palin did when she ran for VP.

And Alaska—we’re set up, unlike other states in the union, where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources.

She had no part of this. The PERMANENT FUND was established in 1976, and passed out its first thousand dollar checks in 1982 (I know, I still have the picture of mine). Hey Colby, if you look it up, you will find Sarah was only 12 years old when the PERMANENT FUND was established. She is amazing, huh, to have pulled that off?

You must have simply highlighted PART of this sentence for effect, huh? Work the sheep, Colby.

So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs.” And she said, “Our state constitution—it lays it out for me, how I’m to conduct business with resource development here as the state C.E.O.

Even though the sheep will ignore the last half of it anyway…the part, beginning: “Our state Constitution…” As they are too stupid to garner the meaning.

Sarah is a muddled candidate and I hope she gains the confederate nomination.

Pablo said:
McCain picked Palin on August 29. The election was on November 4. If you can’t even count, why should we think you capable of further analysis?

It is not my “analysis” that Palin took her kids out of school for nearly 3 months just to prance them around on campaign stages … it is a fact … it is truly a fact.

And, to correct you – she was picked on August 27, not August 29. She pulled her kids out of school at that time & they flew with her to meet McCain & stayed with her & were pranced around by her until after the campaign was over

The doc should be called “The Uneducated.”

How are those poll numbers doing for ya Sarah? Please RUN! Liberals will vote for you in the open primaries.

keepemhonest said:
it is a fact … it is truly a fact

If you say it 20 more times and click your heels, it will be so.

keepemhonest said:
Your question to me is a bit absurd. I posted, “Palin is the first candidate for national office to ever take her kids out of school for 3 months just so they could prance around on a campaign stage.”

Yes, and timzank asked for some supporting evidence for your supposed fact. Your response is absurd. You have either seen such evidence, or you’re spewing unsubstantiated rumor. Which is it, keepmeincoherent?

keepemhonest said:
Your question to me is a bit absurd. I posted, “Palin is the first candidate for national office to ever take her kids out of school for 3 months just so they could prance around on a campaign stage.”

Here is how I would answer your question – NO candidate for VP or President has ever taken their kids out of school for 3 months so that they (the kids) could prance around on campaign stages UNTIL Sarah Palin ran for VP

So, my question for you … can you post a link showing where any other candidate for VP took their kids out of school for 3 months so the candidate for VP could prance their kids around campaign stages like Sarah Palin did when she ran for VP.

Maybe the reason she had them “prance” around on a campaign stage is because she could not afford to have nannies take care of them? Like most “normal” working parents, cupcake? OR, she could tutor them (her parents were teachers afterall), and wanted them around to share in her accomplishment? If you could add to two, you’d be able to sum the total amount of female candidates ever to be nominated for VP. I bet it was very exciting to the entire Palin family. Imagine that. What better reason to “prance” around? Besides, it gets dummies like you to hate her for it just that much more anyway. Clown. I’m sure you’re just concerned about her kids, right?

Maybe they only appeared to “prance” on stage to low-lifes? Anybody showing self esteem, pride, and grace in public, must look like “prancing” to low-lifes, huh?

TangledThorns said:
Palin 2012! Can’t wait till she is president. How can people endorse a failure like Obama is beyond me.

Really? ….and you are endorsing someone who QUIT her office as governor midway through her first term because she hated the job? A job that governed a state with 10% of New York city’s population? This is the person you want making decisions that would directly affect 300 million Americans? Makes sense!

ndanielson said:
Maybe the reason she had them “prance” around on a campaign stage is because she could not afford to have nannies take care of them? Like most “normal” working parents, cupcake? OR, she could tutor them (her parents were teachers afterall), and wanted them around to share in her accomplishment? If you could add to two, you’d be able to sum the total amount of female candidates ever to be nominated for VP. I bet it was very exciting to the entire Palin family. Imagine that. What better reason to “prance” around? Besides, it gets dummies like you to hate her for it just that much more anyway. Clown. I’m sure you’re just concerned about her kids, right?

Maybe they only appeared to “prance” on stage to low-lifes? Anybody showing self esteem, pride, and grace in public, must look like “prancing” to low-lifes, huh?

Prancing she was, and your flaccid defense shows that you are just the typical fawning sheep of Mrs. dumbass.

keepemhonest said:
It is not my “analysis” that Palin took her kids out of school for nearly 3 months just to prance them around on campaign stages … it is a fact … it is truly a fact.

It is a fact that you can’t count. It is truly a fact. You fact is bullshit, and if you could count, you’d note that it is ridiculous on it’s face. If only you could count. If you only…

Gasket – you need to reread what she said when she left office and why. Had nothing to do with hate, had everything to do with respect for her local government andher state and the absurd suites that were being filed against her and costing the taxpayers a fortune; she won every one of them btw.

Get your head out of the sand, expand your horizons, get your news from better sources; turn off the broadcast propagandists and turn away from msnbc and cnn.

She would be a far better President than the manchild in the empty suit that we have today.

Gasket said:
Prancing she was, and your flaccid defense shows that you are just the typical fawning sheep of Mrs. dumbass.

Yeah! Just like Moochelle doing the Humpty Dance!

Oh and PS: Obama did NOTHING as a senator except campaign while getting paid by the tax payers; talk about a leech.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/president_obama_vs_republican_candidates.html
Haha…..20 frigging points, and they will only go south after she opens her mouth again on the stump!

Gasket said:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/president_obama_vs_republican_candidates.html
Haha…..20 frigging points, and they will only go south after she opens her mouth again on the stump!

If she runs, be sure to vote for her in the primaries. Do your part to save this country from the most inept clown in the white house.

Sarah Palin sure gets the lefty idiots all wee weed up…LOL

Pablo said:
Yeah! Just like Moochelle doing the Humpty Dance!

You are smarter than this. I expect this boilerplate from the teabagging bunch like mdanielson and BMG. No credible person can justify a Palin candidacy. You guys would get slaughtered if she ran.,,,and I’m sure you know this — FLOTUS ad hominem notwithstanding. :))

TfT said:
Gasket – you need to reread what she said when she left office and why. Had nothing to do with hate, had everything to do with respect for her local government andher state and the absurd suites that were being filed against her and costing the taxpayers a fortune; she won every one of them btw.

Get your head out of the sand, expand your horizons, get your news from better sources; turn off the broadcast propagandists and turn away from msnbc and cnn.

She would be a far better President than the manchild in the empty suit that we have today.

I trust her emails much more. So, no thanks. Continue being the servile, brown-nosing palindrone. It will not help her in the polls.

ndanielson said:
If she runs, be sure to vote for her in the primaries. Do your part to save this country from the most inept clown in the white house.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html
http://www.politicususa.com/en/sarah-palin-hated
America disagrees. Good luck teabagger. Tee..hee.

So many of you hate her so much it keeps you up at night. Even with facts in front of you and knowing we live in a free country where people can have different views …you liberials are blinded and dont care.
Left wing nuts rather hate her and totally ignore the people who are really evil in this world.
This shows the shallow mind set of you people.

ndanielson said:
If she runs, be sure to vote for her in the primaries.

I agree. I would like all Republicans to vote for her in the primaries. America will accomplish great things if she gets the nomination.

For our brand new little twit and all his facts:

When asked about her kids on the campaign trail and school:

“They’ve been going back and forth and bringing schoolwork with them. Yeah. It’s workin’. With our help and Grandma’s and Grandpa’s help.”

Yep, Grandma and Grandpa were both teachers, capable of tutoring and were also, on the campaign trail…..all two months.

First sentence in POTUS elect’s open letter to his daughters and why should it be an OPEN letter:

I know that you’ve both had a lot of fun these last two years on the campaign trail, going to picnics and parades and state fairs, eating all sorts of junk food your mother and I probably shouldn’t have let you have.

http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/archive/2009/01/15/obama-s-open-letter-to-daughters-malia-amp-sasha.aspx

BTW, school starts before the state fairs are held around here…….in Illinois.

10-year-old Malia Obama first hit the campaign trail before sister Sasha was alive, and was there in 2000 when her dad lost his first run for office. Since then Malia, born on the 4th of July, has traveled the country and grown to past her parents’ shoulders. When she moves to Washington she looks forward, she told Access Hollywood over the summer, to redoing her bedroom.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/07/malia-obama-see-how-shes_n_141836.html

So there ya go ya little liar whiner…….FACTS!

Gasket said:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html
http://www.politicususa.com/en/sarah-palin-hated
America disagrees. Good luck teabagger. Tee..hee.

So a Palin Hater puts up a link to a Conservative hater website and he thinks all of America thinks like him. I love the heading of that piece as much as I love the unhinged comments that follow.

Hey Dude, how about showing us the front page of this fair and balanced website, here I’ll do it for you.

http://www.politicususa.com/

And as we can all see from RCP, (except of course if your a hater) Obama is up right now but somebody neglects the fact that just in the short past it hasn’t shown that way has it?

Time to bag your brain dude. It’s 18 months to the election and 10-1 horses come in at the track.

LMFAO!

Can’t wait to see those debates between Obama and Palin. Get out the popcorn and see the debacle of a lifetime. Palin will be instant toast.

ndanielson said:
Maybe the reason she had them “prance” around on a campaign stage is because she could not afford to have nannies take care of them?

I doubt that is the reason. She would have just used her state credit card to pay.

billyweeds said:
Can’t wait to see those debates between Obama and Palin. Get out the popcorn and see the debacle of a lifetime. Palin will be instant toast.

I know, how can you go up against such an intellect like Barry.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sh6Gx1KrvTw

Barack Must Go said:
Come on Sarah, in or out. The suspense is boring us to death.

Scott Conroy said that a BIG development would be coming in the next few days. I expect her Fox contract to end today or tomorrow and it’ll be hush for for a bit, if at all.

Bring on 2012. The Undefeated shall build it and they will come. :)

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
I doubt that is the reason. She would have just used her state credit card to pay.

Oh wait wouldn’t that be misuse of state funds? Oh I’m sure the Mighty Ollie has proof of that!

Isn’t that a clear violation of some sort of ethics? Why is the woman still free?

Link Please!

Harry Flashman said:
I noted that the new Gallup poll out today has her at #2, just behind Romney and way ahead of any other contender. And she hasn’t even declared yet.

Be afraid, lefties. Be very afraid.

Heh.

Apparently she’s up 20% on Intrade. I can’t wait to have viewing parties for the DVD. Her facebook numbers just went to three million. Hold on tight. It’s gonna be a bumpy ride! :)

skyfet said:
The last time I saw her on Gretta (Palin’s BFF), she was told to stop whining and toughen up. That to me is someone whose been beaten down, and the only fighting back is to cry foul before anything happens.

Why are you watching Palin on Greta? If you despise her so, that’s quite odd.

WCinWI said:
Scott Conroy said that a BIG development would be coming in the next few days. I expect her Fox contract to end today or tomorrow and it’ll be hush for for a bit, if at all.

Bring on 2012. The Undefeated shall build it and they will come. :)

Now with her coming out of the FNC comfy zone we will see is she for real or is she just another Toro Moreno.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Any candidate for president needs the media. No candidate can be elected with wide-spread media attention and coverage. No candidate can make it to Washington without the media. And, FOX “News” isn’t going to get Palin from Scottsdale to Washington. I doubt it can get her to the New Mexico line.

Will you retract your statement when she a) leaves Fox in the next few days, if not by tomorrow and B) if she wins? She’s loved whether you agree with it or not.

If you’d like to name something politically over her near 20 yrs in public office that you have issue with, please let me know. Then we’ll debate.

puck30 said:
Now with her coming out of the FNC comfy zone we will see is she for real or is she just another Toro Moreno.

Very true. I saw her in Madison. It was awesome. The Tea Party is a huge thing, which actually means something in this state. I can’t wait to get involved.

I’m sure she’s learned that the only way to do an interview is live. No editing. Or to have dual film-makers. Station and personal.

She’s been one of the most ardent supporters of Ryan so that means a lot to me.

keepemhonest said:
Palin’s flick is going to play in theaters … hmm … how much money is Palin projecting she will earn off of her ‘acting debut”

Palin is all about money … this is one more scam where she wants to make more money —- I predict it will be a Box Office FLOP

I’m suspecting none – since she didn’t front the costs. Keep up dude.

keepemhonest said:
No, I do not yell at kids who are playing in Little League games. Why should I?

I don’t yell at Palin’s kids when she prances them around the media during HER political speeches etc.

Why would you ask me such a ridiculous question anyway?

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH kids at political events AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

The Republic is over because of kids at political events. AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Gasket said:
Really? ….and you are endorsing someone who QUIT her office as governor midway through her first term because she hated the job? A job that governed a state with 10% of New York city’s population? This is the person you want making decisions that would directly affect 300 million Americans? Makes sense!

tell us why she resigned Gasket. You seem to know everything. Give us the real reason….. (not the one from your favourite left blog). Ahhh how many frivolous law suits (backed by Soros) were thrown her way? You know our crazy legal system where you can sue to your hearts content and damn – they have to respond (money)…..

So, let’s hear your version. The truth now – or your nose will grow.

keepemhonest said:
No, I did not give lies & smears. I gave facts. I gave FACTS on why Palin is a horrible parent.

Palin takes her children out of school just so she can prance them around on a stage with her … that IS HORRIBLE parenting. That makes Palin a HORRIBLE parent.

Kids should be in school learning … they should not have UNEXCUSED absences, missing valuable information, just so their mother can prance them around on stage with her so she can use them as political pawns and deflect from her own ignorance.

Actually, teaching your kids how to be engaged in politics is the smartest thing a parent can do. It’s called being an American.

Plus, you’re predicating your analogy on the idea on an assumption. You’re ASSUMING that the kids learn anything. Palin has always commented publicly about the good quality of her kids’ teachers. However, last I checked, not every day of school was a learning experience. I’d much rather a child learn a concept on their own than without the assistance of another.

I sincerely hope that you are single as no person that has children (and I don’t) thinks that bringing kids along is prancing them around. Do you not think that some that like the Obama’s at a personal level (emotional), like to see the daughters and know what is up with the daughters? The daughters are always out.

Come up with a new meme. Your current one is tragic.

keepemhonest said:
Slander? Do you know the definition of the word, “slander”

Sarah Palin has never been slandered.

I don’t think the left is afraid of a “strong woman” … I think you are making that up.

She’s been both slandered and libeled. Do you know the definition. Jack Steuf certainly does.

If anyone had doubts before, this should convince them that Sarah Palin will run for president in 2012. That’s exactly what I said in my May 23 column:

http://eworss.com/waiting_for_sarah_palin.htm

keepemhonest said:
Seek, actually you did NOT answer my question. You have NOT answered why YOU lie about what I actually post.

Why do you do that?

BTW: Palin is the first candidate for national office to ever take her kids out of school for 3 months just so they could prance around on a campaign stage.

I never brought up her daughter who made a mistake & got pregnant up out of wed lock – so – why are YOU bringing that up?

Why do you want to talk about her daughter who got pregnant out of wed lock?

Why do you think that’s a big deal?

Are you angry that her daughter made a mistake? Do you think her daughter’s pregnancy out of wed lock is something you & should discuss?

As a female candidate, I’m sure that Palin expected their political team to win, however McCain halted that from happening when he stopped campaigning and instead went to the Senate.

As a female, it would’ve been a momentous occasion for a female to win such a high office and based off of talents. It would and still will be a story to tell our children.

Enjoy 2012. :)

My apology here is the correct link.

http://ewross.com/waiting_for_sarah_palin.htm

Rgentum said:
Seriously, Palin made a movie about herself called “The Undefeated”? Well, at least she’s marginally easier on the eyes than Kim Jong Il.

No. Bannon did. She didn’t finance any of it.

2012. :)

keepemhonest said:
It is not my “analysis” that Palin took her kids out of school for nearly 3 months just to prance them around on campaign stages … it is a fact … it is truly a fact.

And, to correct you – she was picked on August 27, not August 29. She pulled her kids out of school at that time & they flew with her to meet McCain & stayed with her & were pranced around by her until after the campaign was over

Dude. You can’t count. Just stop.

Gasket said:
The doc should be called “The Uneducated.”

How are those poll numbers doing for ya Sarah? Please RUN! Liberals will vote for you in the open primaries.

I hope you understand that a lot of PUMAs and liberals will vote for Palin – on substance. Her site has tons of Democrats on it. The Hillbuzz boys are even Palin’s supporters. Deal with it.

gasket is going to blow. What name will he have to come up with then? 0-ring?

Gasket said:
Really? ….and you are endorsing someone who QUIT her office as governor midway through her first term because she hated the job? A job that governed a state with 10% of New York city’s population? This is the person you want making decisions that would directly affect 300 million Americans? Makes sense!

Don’t be mad that Alaska is a state with a surplus and NY is worried about its salt and chocolate milk.

I would love it if you tried to live in Alaska – let’s see how long you last in that state. :)

Can you show me a link where Palin left because she hated her job? Last I checked, it was because she was in legal debt due to liberal folks hammering her state with ethics violations that she had to personally pay for. That plus the legal issues were costing the state millions of dollars. Hence, she left to save her state money.

This debate will be epic. Especially when we, as conservatives or independent folks, operate on facts. Obama in 2008 didn’t have a record. Obama now has a failing record. I can’t wait!

Look at some of the stories – the left walking back comments, denying saying what they said, excusing what they said, saying they didn’t say what they said.

lol

rather humorous really. Since there is no right wing smear t.v. we don’t get to wallow in it. Whoops, it’s there one minute and then scrubbed.

Allllllllllll aboard!!!!!!!!

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash11.htm

seek said:
Look at some of the stories – the left walking back comments, denying saying what they said, excusing what they said, saying they didn’t say what they said.

Typical leftist excuse progression:

Pedestrian: “Hey, your dog just bit me!”

Leftist: ” I don’t have a dog.”

Pedestrian: “Yes you do! He just went into your house.”

Leftist: “That’s not my dog.”

P: “Yes it is! I saw you walking him yesterday. And a week ago, I saw you put him in your car, with your family.”

L: “You must have provoked him. What did you do to my dog?”

P: “Nothing. I was walking down the street minding my own business when your dog ran out and bit me!”

L: “I don’t have a dog.”

Pablo said:
Typical leftist excuse progression:

Pedestrian: “Hey, your dog just bit me!”

Leftist: ” I don’t have a dog.”

Pedestrian: “Yes you do! He just went into your house.”

Leftist: “That’s not my dog.”

P: “Yes it is! I saw you walking him yesterday. And a week ago, I saw you put him in your car, with your family.”

L: “You must have provoked him. What did you do to my dog?”

P: “Nothing. I was walking down the street minding my own business when your dog ran out and bit me!”

L: “I don’t have a dog.”

HAHAHA

WCinWI said:
I hope you understand that a lot of PUMAs and liberals will vote for Palin – on substance. Her site has tons of Democrats on it. The Hillbuzz boys are even Palin’s supporters. Deal with it.

you have no credibility in this. forget PDS, you’re so far up her nethers it’s embarassing. slightly pathetic, too.

Nate Silver will have the best polls regarding these upcoming races, favorability, etc. Here’ Palin tags http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/tag/sarah-palin/

WCinWI said:
I would love it if you tried to live in Alaska – let’s see how long you last in that state. :)

Like you’ve lived in Alaska. Of course, you’ve told so many inconsistencies (law school, ha!), maybe you have…

In this version of “The Undefeated”, will Sarah get the John Wayne role, or will she be Rock Hudson?
I’ll give one vote for Rock, better wardrobe.

avoidswork said:

HAHAHAHAHA oh my. You are delusional.

WCinWI said:
HAHAHAHAHA oh my. You are delusional.

really? i’m not the one making wild claims like “a shoe can beat obama” or that PUMAs would vote for Palin or that Bachmann won’t run, Palin will AND she’ll win, blah blah blah.

I’m not the one up Palin’s nethers ignoring the obvious — her GENERAL unfavorables are at their highest, her unfavorables have only INCREASED as time/exposure to her increases and her only increases are within the GOP. I am aware that among GOPers, she’s #2 to Romney. But the GOP elite does not like her. And when you’re thinking of primaries, etc., you are forgetting all the politics, backroom stuff, etc (think Hillary). So, once again, I assert that you’re the delusional one.

Obama could lose re-election in 2012. But it won’t be to Palin. H*ll, she won’t even be anywhere near the ticket. (Because that went sooooooo well last time).

You’re the one who has posted countless times on this thread. Not me. So, I don’t think you know what “delusional” really means.

My (joking) handle may be “avoidswork”, but I have a job. I’ve been contributing to America via state and federal taxes longer than you have. AND while I was in school(s).

you’re just someone who lives and breathes mediaite, hot air and conservatives 4 palin. ((of course, that is if you are telling the truth.)) Unlike you, I’m not lying about myself on this site. It’s apparent that you don’t have a job (or you’re a paid blogger) since the amount of time you spend on this site seems to be full-time, along with your Palin adoration/defense.

now, I’ve got to finish up some work stuff, then go meet friends for after work drinks in the City (SF, naturally) before heading to MOMA to view an exhibit.

Having made millions and having unbounded ego and no sense of proportion, I think she is working towards being in the record books as having won at least one Presidential primary