1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser
Advertisement

Mitt Romney bin Busted: ‘Candidate Like Myself’ Would Have Done Bin Laden Raid (Except 2007 Mitt)

video
» 115 comments

At Christmastime, it’s comforting to know that a Mitt Romney interview is the gift that keeps on giving. On Wednesday’s The Daily Rundown, host Chuck Todd drew a lot out of the candidate with his deceptively easygoing style. Todd asked Romney about the notion that “any president” would have carried out the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, and Romney said “I think other presidents and other candidates like myself would do exactly the same thing.”

RELATED: Donald Trump Belittles bin Laden Killing: ‘Who Wouldn’t Make That Decision?’

Shockingly, Mitt Romney from four years ago sang a completely different tune, as did almost all of the President’s opponents at the time, Republican or Democratic.

“You said something interesting to Chris Wallace about the bin Laden decision by the President,” Todd said to Romney. “You said any president would have made that decision. What did you mean by just any president? It seemed a little whimsical. Maybe you didn’t mean it to sound that way.”

While saying he gave credit to President Obama for making the decision, Romney added, “I don’t think it’s unusual on the part of this president to have finally taken out Osama bin Laden.”

Todd, pro that he is, remembered that this exact question was a hot issue early in the 2008 campaign. “Four years ago this became a debate a issue. Do you act unilaterally in Pakistan. Are you comfortably to act unilaterally, without maybe telling an ally like Pakistan that you might be firing drones in their country?”

“I think in a setting like this one where Osama bin Laden was identified to be hiding in pakistan, that it was entirely appropriate for this president to move in and to take him out,” Romney replied, later adding that “In a similar circumstance, I think other presidents and other candidates, like myself, would do exactly the same thing.”

RELATED: Republican and Democratic Opponents Attacked Obama for Promising to Raid Pakistan to Kill Osama bin Laden

Keep in mind that then-Sen. Obama couldn’t have described this setting better, in 2007, than if he were Miss Cleo:

“There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans,” he said. “They are plotting to strike again. . . . If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won’t act, we will.”

While Barack Obama’s rivals attacked him vigorously over the statement at the time, not all of them did so on the basis of opposition to unilateral action. What did Mitt Romney say then? A source from Priorities USA Action points out that he said this to Reuters at the time:

“I do not concur in the words of Barack Obama in a plan to enter an ally of ours… I don’t think those kinds of comments help in this effort to draw more friends to our effort,” Romney told reporters on the campaign trail.

…Romney, the former Massachusetts governor who is one of the Republican front-runners, said U.S. troops “shouldn’t be sent all over the world.” He called Obama’s comments “ill-timed” and “ill-considered.”

“There is a war being waged by terrorists of different types and nature across the world,” Romney said. “We want, as a civilized world, to participate with other nations in this civilized effort to help those nations reject the extreme with them.”

So, Romney was against unilateral action (which President Obama took in killing bin Laden), and wanted to keep Pakistan in the loop, which President Obama did not do lest they tip bin Laden off. It sounds like Mitt Romney would not have done what President Obama did. In comments to the Associated Press, Romney even seemed to rule out using US troops (like SEAL Team 6) at all:

Instead of issuing threats, the United States should work with nations to root out extremist forces, Romney said.

“We want as a civilized world to participate with other nations in this civilized effort to help those nations reject the extreme within them,” Romney said. “That doesn’t mean that our troops are going to go all over the world.”

Romney said the remarks were not helpful to the American effort.

Not to worry, though. Even if Romney does manage to be elected president someday, there’s a decent chance President Obama will have killed all of the terrorists by then.

Here’s the clip, from The Daily Rundown:


 

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • joel weiss

    Now Mediaite lost me. You guys made it sound as if Romney flip flopped again. 
    Is it really a slow news day here ???

  • Anonymous

    …If it’s difficult for Mitt to keep up with Mitt, what chance do the rest of us have.

  • http://www.facebook.com/gavin.mcdougald Gavin McDougald

    Wow. Just wow..

  • 12voltman1

    Willard has flip flopped again!
    It is what he does.
    Worst than McCain!

  • Anonymous

    Your continued rampant disregard for the facts does not shine well on you, Tommy.  If Romney is such an evil person, then let his words stand on their own.  Why the need to blatantly lie?  I can only assume that you’re extremely worried that Romney is a threat when it comes to the POTUS’s defeat.

    “There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans,” he said. “They are plotting to strike again. . . . If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won’t act, we will.”

    That, actually, isn’t anything like what happened with Bin Laden.  Also, many people, including the former head of Pakistans intelligence services believe Pakistani security forces not only knew about the raid but provided security.  

    It’s unfortunate that you continue to leave out details which would throw a monkey wrench into your wild theories, while twisting other (square) details to make them fit into your (round) narrative.  

    Just admit that you really could care less about facts or truth and that you’re only interested in being an untruthful propagandist.  

  • Gloves V. Donahue

    Maybe someday, just for fun, some reporter might look into Obama’s background, like what is being done with Mitt Romney, the likely next President.

  • Anonymous

    Oh brother, you can get a community college student to do the attack ads on Mitt if he gets the nomination and still win easily

  • Anonymous

    Still living in fantasy hm?  You’re the only person the internet I’ve seen who is not only certain Mitt will win the nomination but also sure he’ll win the general election.  You never care to say why, just, it will happen.  Poor guy, another election night of tears await him.

  • Anonymous

    This is a week argument.  Romney criticized Obama for saying he would act without consulting Pakistan, which is a dumb thing to say.  Romney understands that just because you think something, you don’t proclaim it to the world.  That way when you do act without consulting Pakistan, you then tell them we thought it would be best to act without consulting them for their own safety.  Romney has foresight and intelligence.

  • Anonymous

    Let me be the first to call one of these Mitt Romneys a RINO.

  • Anonymous

    You mean “Worse than McCain!”  You can type your comments into Microsoft Word before you post them and it will catch the errors.

  • Anonymous

    Grasp at straws much Tommy?

    Your fear of the anointed one getting the boot is shining bright.

  • Anonymous

    You’ve already used that one.

  • Anonymous

    You kidding me? Of course the lame stream media looked into the anointed ones background…..they had to know what to cover up and bury in order to protect the agitator!!

  • Anonymous

    No sh!t.  It’s kinda fun to watch.  Give the guy credit.  He’s a one man p.r./propaganda firm.  I don’t know where he finds the time to do anything else.  If Mitt Romney or any other person on the planet criticizes Obama for anything, you know good ol’ Tommy will come to the rescue with a laugh out loud essay full of factual inaccuracies, half truths and full blown craziness.  

  • Mo Fokker

    Another example demonstrating that Mitt Romney is a political gymnast who has no core.

  • Anonymous

    Mitt Romney was born with a gold spoon in his mouth. He grew up wealthy and was a class mate of George W Bush at Harvard. He used his political ties to get a job playing with businesses like a monopoly game. He made profits for investors or cut the business and shut it down. We are still feeling the pain from these Enron type businesses that was a big part of the unemployment numbers. He sounds like nails on a chalk board every time he says that he was in the private sector. He was not in the sector he just played it for profit. we might as well bring Bush back if we vote for Mitt Romney.

  • 12voltman1

    Windows 7 sucks!
     LOL

  • SouthernYankee

    What the matter?  He is telling the truth.  Go back and look at the video.  I remember the dustup when Obama said it back then.  Even Hillary had something to say about it.  But don’t worry even if Obama is a one term president I’m sure he’ll have made a big hugh dent in getting the terrorist unlike Bush/Cheney.  Don’t hate because the reporter was telling the truth.  Especially when Mitt flips and flops all over the place.  Hell the man can’t even win an argument with himself he changes so much.

  • Anonymous

    Tommy, If Dan Abrams ever decides to make Mediaite a creditable web site you can always go over to huffpuff or mediamatters!!

  • Anonymous

    Does David Axelrod always do your thinking for you?  Do you go to his favorite restaurants, see his favorite movies and order his favorite concoction of mocha locha chocha at Starbucks?

  • 12voltman1

    I am keeping track of you from my cubicle.

  • Anonymous

    LOL  Now that’s one for the record book…This guy is as phony as they get and everyone knows it.

  • Anonymous

    x2!    a micro-phoney……………..and a phoney at the mike

  • Anonymous

    And not even talking about his decision to take out bin-Laden. I remember when Obama was running for President and said he will find bin Laden and he is probably in Pakistan..Everyone was making fun of him..

  • Anonymous

    Kinda hard to defend the ol trusty windvane huh?

  • Anonymous

    …and you’ll still be unemployed and bitter. :(

  • Anonymous

    Be careful. He’s cuckoo. 

  • Anonymous

    I don’t think MIttens knows or cares whether he is contradicting himself. 

  • Mo Fokker

    He is a political shyster of sorts.

  • http://twitter.com/ArtfulGeek anthony i.

    i like how you totally ignore the subject at hand and take cheap shots instead…..

  • News Of The World

    And here you are yet again, reading the website.  TROLL.  Old, bitter, troll.

  • Anonymous

    This is just soooo funny to read – Tommy making up stuff again.  ANY PRESIDENT who had actionable intelligence on a high value target would have done the same thing!  Stop trying to make the manchild a man TC, it does you no good.

    Just gives many of us a howler or two.

    Geez

  • Anonymous

    haha.

  • Joke Scareborough

    See all those weirdos in North Korea collapsing to the ground in grief and despair over Dear Leader’s death?
    That’s what you’re dealing with in Mediaite. This place is one giant Obama cult.

  • Joke Scareborough

    Dan created MessNBC and hired Racheal Sklar to run Mediaite…so fat chance of that ever happening. This place runs the ridiculously biased way Dan wants it to run.

    Seriously, who in their right f*cking mind would ever give Tommy a job covering politics…that is unless you deliberately want some leftist Bizarro world clap trap on your blog.

  • Anonymous

    NBC – the National barak Channel – I would bet you a chunk of change that Team Obama sent that very question to Chuck Todd who then posed it to Mitt after he was told by Team Obama to do so.

  • Anonymous

    No likes Grammar police!

  • Anonymous

    Mitt the flip flopper and Newt the would-be-dictator.  The choices Republicants must make.  These two characters will tell you anything for a buck.

  • Anonymous

    So true, I wonder where these so called journalist were when Obama never took a stand in the senate… just voting present to everything.. How about digging into his college records and see his grade point average like they did with Bush or him and his wife attending a church of a man who hated America or having dinner with a known bomber at his house who hated cops..

    .I guess its like North Korea to the left wing media… Dont question authority and only praise your leader.

  • Anonymous

    “Many people believe…?” That’s your argument? This is why conservative media thrives, facts are completely optional. 

    If you’re going to say I lied, you have to demonstrate that. You haven’t. That makes you a liar, and I won’t allow that. Demonstrate, or retract.

  • Anonymous

    I was right!  Tommy has a stalker!  Tina_Tampa, come on down!!!!  LOLOLOLOL

  • Anonymous

    in 2007, Romney flat-out said he would NOT do the same thing. Did you bother to read?

  • Walt

     ”I guess its like North Korea to the left wing media… Don’t question authority and only praise your leader.”  Maybe you ought to try saying that in the mirror with a straight face, hypocrite.  And maybe you should get your facts straight before you speak out of your ass… oh that’s right, you reside in that right wing propaganda world.  You are a useful tool to your masters.  

  • Walt

    Let’s see, “lame stream media” and “the anointed one”… references to Palin and Hannity.  Really?…  It ain’t even worth it.  You are too far gone.

  • Hout Bosques

    Seems like you may have some motivation to no longer hear the soft “flip flop flip flop flip flop” of Mittens on the campaign trial.

    Seems like you just don’t want to think about the implications of that daily, hell, almost hourly, phenomenon. 

    Seems like you don’t want other folks to bear that in mind either.

    Question: At what point does chronic flip-flopping become serial lying?

  • Hout Bosques

    Mittens is at once way more used to being around it, since he’s around it every waking minute, but on the other hand is also the only person denied the opportunity to watch it with any degree of objectivity.

  • Hout Bosques

    Ah yes, the old “change the subject” move, right on schedule.

  • Hout Bosques

    Actually, you’re correct. That guy who’s been digging up old YouTube’s of Mitten’s Best in History Flip Flops is doing it entirely for the fun of it.

  • 12voltman1

    It’s mind control that we use.

  • Hout Bosques

    Two things.

    First thing: the idea behind doing that sort of thing, making campaign promises then living up to them, is to provide some degree of confidence to voters that they know what it is they’re voting for – as opposed to the continual sound of flip-flop flip-flop flip-flop where we don’t even know if the candidate is coming or going on any issue. I’m not saying Mittens can help doing this – I should think by the time you get to his age, it’s pretty deeply engrained & is not indistinguishable from who he is.Second thing: this criticism from Romney of ‘informing’ the world in advance runs contrary to his various expressions of hyper-aggression against Iran while on the campaign trail & on stage during the 4,623,872 GOP Contests. 

  • Hout Bosques

    Whereas the other is an ONIR.

  • Hout Bosques

    It’s not really THAT hard: all you have to do is pay attention to what the contestants say & then ask yourself, Hmmm, I wonder if he’s been CONSISTENT on that?

    That’s not propaganda. Propaganda is when you make shit up out of whole cloth (which, by the way, Romney is doing a LOT of), or when you take something unrelated & try to convert it into something it never applied to. It’s not propaganda when you report stuff that actually happened.

  • Anonymous

    …He’s created a labyrinth all for and by himself.

  • Hout Bosques

    You’re an idiot, maybe even more than your near namesake. Mediaite on the whole is very much located in the right side of the stream. What you seem not to like is how easy it is to point out, even from that position, how ridiculous these GOP contestants sound. That’s not Mediaite’s doing; that’s entirely on the contestants. 

  • 12voltman1

    Do you get all of your information from News Corp?
    Just wondering.
    I am dead serious.

  • 12voltman1

    LOL
    It shows what you know.

  • Hout Bosques

    Bush actually might have been better. He got increasingly predictable over time. I’m not sure that could ever happen with Mittens; it depends entirely on the color of his mood ring at the time he has to decide.

    I hadn’t actually noticed that Bush & Romney were “class mates” at Harvard Business before you raised it. Romney was in an experimental program combining law and business. For some reason they got rid of that program, deeming the experiment a failure. Mitt of course was the star of that failed experiment.

  • 12voltman1

    We can’t allow that.

  • Hout Bosques

    AFAWK, no one is actually forcing you to come here & post comments.

  • 12voltman1

    They preform our bidding well.

  • Hout Bosques

    I still think there’s a plausible way for Perry to win this, so long as the roughly 75% Not Mittens vote holds. As the primary season deepens, more and more delegates start coming from the southern states, among them being Texas, and the way the GOP primary contest is set up, the states that do their voting after April 1 have a lot more delegates to allocate & by plurality-takes-all. Perry has oodles of money & as good a ground game as Romney, maybe better, CERTAINLY better in the southern states, and the GOP primaries are also set up to reward states which reliably send Republicans to Washington with extra delegates, which again better serves Perry. He needs to show patience, but that’s exactly what he showed in winning in Texas so much, and he needs to catch a break in what happens with the second choice of the delegates at the convention pledged first to Ron Paul & to Gingrich – but to my mind, I would think those delegates would be by definition Not Mittens delegates. 

  • 12voltman1

    We control him too!

  • SouthernYankee

    Yep betcha.

  • http://mittromneycult.blogspot.com/ Purple Pimpernel

    Romney told reporters, “that’s the point of a campaign, to point out distinctions” that allow voters “to make their decision on an informed basis.”
    I’d like to point out a few of Romney’s distinctions that voters should be informed about. See mittromneycult.blogspot.com to see the loyalty oaths that Romney has made to his Mormon Church. How can he swear allegiance to the American people when he’s already sworn his loyalty elsewhere?

  • SouthernYankee

    You bet.  Republicans forget would they all were up in arms about that comment.  Obama stuck by his word. 

  • SouthernYankee

    Well said.

  • SouthernYankee

    Boy you said it.  Your so right.

  • Anonymous

    Obama credited Pakistani intelligence services for aiding the U.S.  Whether there was any guarding being done, that might be a match they don’t want to strike.  It may have been said, not on record.

    http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/05/cnn-osama-bin-laden-dead/37230/

    Other than Obama admitting they gave the location, there are many reasons to believe Pakistan was involved a bit deeper.

    U.S. intelligence had learned that bin Laden might be holed up in a high-walled compound in Abbottabad, some 50 miles northeast of Islamabad, last August. Basically a suburb of the capital, the well-to-do city is home to many retired Pakistani military officers as well as Pakistan’s military academy. That may explain the extraordinary secrecy surround the operation: few top officials in the U.S. government knew such an operation was afoot, and news of it wasn’t shared with any allies, including Pakistan. How bin Laden was able to reside in a posh compound for months, if not years, surrounded by former Pakistani military officers remains unknown.

    Read more: http://techland.time.com/2011/05/02/this-is-where-osama-was-hiding-according-to-google-maps/#ixzz1hDQX2CJz

  • Anonymous

    Other than the NK sarcasm, what was untrue?  List it.

  • Anonymous

    “windvane?”  weather vane?  Yeah, Axelrod has been spinning so much lately I’m almost afraid of looking at him for fear that something uglier than his words will be spewing out of his mouth.

  • Anonymous

    Heh, a tacit agreement with JS.  lol

  • Anonymous

    Then why are you here?

  • Anonymous

    Excellent job Tommy.  Now only if the mainstream media would do the same thing.

  • Charles Ulysses Feney

    ChickenHawk Mitt, who not only avoided military service himself, but wouldn’t let any of his five sons serve after 911, because they had more ‘important” work on his campaign!

    CHICKENHAWK OF THE YEAR AWARD…….MITT ROMNEY!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4xEK9IP2z0

  • Anonymous

    Then why aren’t you trolls somewhere else?  Here’s a good place to start. http://www.worldnetdaily.com

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CUWI52ZYX7LTI6RMQZFX7V47BA AlanD

    another day, another pendantic anti-republican posting from tommy christopher.  the old romney quotes prove nothing.  and we now know that pakistan has been playing a double game, something that wasn’t as evident in 2007-2008.  you need a fact checker or sanity checker to keep your agenda in check.

  • Anonymous

    You must be the most mature one here. Any other names you found to call people?

  • Anonymous

    Exactly. It usually stops around 9ish because they have school in the morning.

  • Anonymous

    Who cares. He got the point across.

  • Anonymous

    Oh, those candidates, can be some pretty unreliable hombres.  Look at this one, folded in less than two months:

    Obama the candidate vs Obama the president

    Iraq troop withdrawel, GITMO, lobbyists, earmarks, partisanship, divisiveness….lol, anyone check the rise of the  oceans yet?

    It get’s more hilarious:

    tada!

    “I didn’t come here to pass on our problems to the next president or the next generation—I came to solve them.”

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29818063/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-candidate-vs-obama-president/

    Tell that to the next few generations saddled with Obama’s spending spree.

  • Walt

    That’s cynical sarcasm to you.  Please child, I will not entertain your ignorance.  It won’t change your irrational and delusional syndrome.

  • shonangreg

    Sir Walter Scott had good advice for Romney some 200 years ago:

    Oh what a tangled web we weave,
    When first we practise to deceive!

  • shonangreg

    Have you “conservatives” colluded on another type of “digg patriots” attack here? There is nothing inaccurate, mis-representative, or overstated in the article. Yet a number of you “conservatives” are whining about bias.

    Have you no shame? Your lock-step actions in this case are frankly disgusting.

    note: anyone not knowing what “digg patriots” is, please google it. The perpetrators / conspirators were caught in the act of trying to control the news. They are still out there, and they are going to be trying it again and again. Liberals might give a go too, I guess, but those on the right are documented to have done it. So, any time you hear whines of bias, check to see if the claims stand up. In this case, none of the right-wing whiners are even giving specifics about their claims. They’re just ganging up with each other hoping the numbers give their charge a sense of credibility — just like they did at digg.

  • Smack80

    “Threw” the election? Like what, faked a pulled hammy on the last lap? The Repubs might have thrown the election by choosing Ms Palin, that got me to switch parties finally, but I think that was more out of arrogant stupidity than intentional “throwing”.

  • Smack80

    No need to, I’m sure “they” are already watching. At least that’s what the voices in my head are telling me!

  • Smack80

    Do what? Did you sleep through that whole “birther” fiasco when we became the laughing-stock of the planet…again?

  • Centrist79

    We got Romney cheaper than Obama, but he wanted two more weeks vacation. We have Paul in our sights now, maybe we offer him a eyebrow trim. Never mess with the pentagon, we have your phones tapped.

  • Right Speak

    What’s your point?

    In 2007, Romney had no idea Bin Laden would be found living the high life in the center of Pakistan.

    Knowing that NOW! Of course he would have changed his view on our relationship with Pakistan and would have ok’d the strike, like Obama did..

    Sorry, NON-STORY!
     

  • 12voltman1

    I always thought it was Mark Twain that said
    “A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on”?

  • 12voltman1

    ‘A lie can travel halfway round the world while the truth is putting on its
    shoes.

  • 12voltman1

    A lie can travel halfway round the world while the truth is putting on its
    shoes.

  • Anonymous

    …Well put!

  • Smack80

    Twain does also get credit but usually it’s Churchill.

  • Joke Scareborough

    I’m here because I get a real kick out of the reaction I get from O-bots when I splash a heaping dose of reality in their faces.

  • Anonymous

    You have never heard of that term before?
    http://www.secondwind.com/Sensors/wind-vanes.html 

  • Anonymous

    Cuckoo, it amuses me how irate you become. You seriously are psychotic, and I don’t say that to be insulting. You really have a mental problem. Seek help before it’s too late.

  • Anonymous

    Alas, he fits in very well with the Grover Norquist pledge-keepers.

  • Anonymous

    School or a job, something you mindless bloggers would no nothing about.

  • WiddleBabyDanielson

    took me a second.

  • WiddleBabyDanielson

    Mitt of course was the star of that failed experiment.

    OUCH!

  • WiddleBabyDanielson

    He said who to what?

  • Anonymous

    Maybe you didn’t catch the salient point. Present day Mitt says anyone would have given the go ahead to invade Pakistan and get OBL.

    Past Mitt says “I do not concur in the words of Barack Obama in a plan to enter an ally of ours (Pakistan)…

    Pretty funny eh?

  • Anonymous

    Can’t or won’t answer, heh.  Hyperbolic, biased nutcase, the prime example of delusional, irrational and ignorant.  When you don’t have an answer, fall back on bs attacks and project. 

  • Anonymous

    That’s why you responded to a David Axelrod comment, that’s why I agreed with you that he’s spinning like a “windvane.” whatever.

  • http://www.intoxination.net intoxination

    I remember one debate when Barack Obama said this very same thing on John McCain responded saying it was dangerous thinking and showed Obama’s lack of experience. It just shows that national security is nothing but a political game to the right and explains why the left is viewed more favorably on the issue. 

  • Anonymous

    In your case, maybe middle school.

  • Anonymous

    Me and most of us that know the facts just laugh.

  • Anonymous

    Mitt is simply unelectable as are the rest of these so called candidates.

    Romney tests the winds everyday to develop his policy.  If he were to win the nomination he would swing back to the left.  The question then would be how far to the left he would go.

  • http://mediamatters.org/ Leedog

    Further proof that Obama will destroy Romney in the debates if Romney win the nomination!!

  • Anonymous

    Why keep harping about his grades? Who cares? They only dragged Bush’ grades out because he was a dope in school. How do you know that Obama knew the guy bombed anything. Do you know what all of your neighbor’s did in their history? No you don’t. How do you know that he hates America? It’s a ridiculous charge. You just want a reason to hate the President. If you want to criticize him, do it about his policy. 

  • Anonymous

    If you add up all the time you spend making these paranoid comments, you’ll find that you’d spend less time by just going to the doctor and getting a prescription for anti-schizophrenia meds that may just take care of the problem.

  • Anonymous

    Mitt flip flopping????noooooooooooo

  • http://twitter.com/jay__wilson jay wilson

    The whole point was that it was uncertain that bin Ladin was even there.

    “I think in a setting like this one where Osama bin Laden was identified to be hiding in pakistan, that it was entirely appropriate for this president to move in and to take him out,” Romney replied

  • http://twitter.com/jay__wilson jay wilson

    “I think in a setting like this one where Osama bin Laden was identified to be hiding in pakistan, that it was entirely appropriate for this president to move in and to take him out,” Romney replied

    The whole point was it was UNCERTAIN whether bin Ladin was even there…

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram