It was funny but informative. 

Goes to show how idiotic the repukes are with the “personhood” amendment. 

Why does someone with no chance of getting pregnant seem so hyped about abortion?  I am talking about Maddow, not Romney.  MSNBC, keeping it classy.  Next week, Ed Shultz talks about his dick using a sippy straw.

Oh Rachel, conservatives don’t want to hear that sh*t — It’s SCIENCE for Pete’s Sake!! What the hell are you thinking?!? Next time, doll? Throw in Jesus, Moses, a few donkeys from Egypt, and THEN they’ll get it.

THEN they’ll get it!! 

[Whisper: Just don't talk about Mary's miraculous conception cause that just destroys the whole science-schmience conspiracy. Shhh...]

I love the look the people at the event give the woman asking the question. As if to say, “wait a minute, someone actually is willing to have sex with you?”

She’ll never get pregnant, so she doesn’t want any one else to get pregnant either.

Lesbos view making babies as “icky”.

It’s called women’s rights, moron. Hell, may as well say MEN’s rights too. We have plenty of them playing the role of the dead beat dad. Perhaps if Joe Walsh wasn’t so right-wing and supported abortion, his dumb ass wouldn’t have let his own kids live in poverty. The sick f*ck! 

i always like george carlin’s line:  ”you ever notice that the people who are against
abortion you wouldn’t want to have sex with in the first place!”

You are dumb. What makes you think a lesbian wouldn’t want to get pregnant? You do realize that millions do….right? Ignorant teabagger. They do not date men….that does not mean they can not get pregnant or “hate babies.” 

Someone had to have sex with your mom…right?

If you can’t afford to get pregnant don’t hold up the figurative signs that say drill here drill now.  I didn’t see she was holding up that sign but what a loon that girl was foisting her inane comments on Romney. She tried to grab the mic back but I’m glad Romney saved the room and everyone who watched the video from hearing more of something that would make attempt to make everyone pull their hair out. Olbermann down a Madcow to go!

As a Republican, you don’t understand the whole rights thing. 

Wow all this time I thought she had a penis!

Hmm – that number: 99% of women. BIG number. Probably a lot of ‘em could vote too. Oopsie – we amended the constitution to allow for that.  We’re talking, oh around 160 million Americans, and of that number, at least half with some sort of ‘practical’ and quite direct interest in this issue, and ALL of them at some point, for years.

Sure, some won’t want the right – that’s their right to choose, too. But … 99%. BIG number. That tells us that, no matter what some women tell their parents, or their partners, or their spouses, almost 160 million face this.

This, I must say, was a big unforced error on Mitten’s part. Goes to show: he can look great in a line-up of the electorally infirm, but not exactly great next to a real woman with a real women’s issue. So, this is going to leave a mark. The DNC video library must be bulging by now. 

First: never is a long time and covers a lot of living. Second: how do you know that? R U Kreskin? Third, I very much doubt you have the first clue about what same-sex preference-inclined people think. Seriously: I doubt it a LOT. Fourth: sexual preference isn’t quite the same thing as being pregnant; just ask an OBGYN – thousands of same-sex preferring women not only see the distinction, they act on it.

I’m tempted to repeat your “had to”, but that would be insensitive to his mom, who I have no reason to think is not a fine person who spends a lot of time worrying about what went wrong with her son.

Just look at the ernest face!  Who can resist that?  (gee just about anybody).

Call me crazy but isn’t she about the last person a “woman” would look for to explain conception?
Sorry Rachel but if you saw a penis you would go into anaphylactic shock and….

don’t you love where Rachel says she’s a “news organization” – right…..lol

You sad, pathetic thing you. You don’t even get that you don’t get it. Some woman bore you, and maybe even chose to do so. I mean, that 99% number suggests that it’s overwhelmingly likely your mom used some form of birth control, but chose not so she could have you. You should take what you’ve posted here and show her; I’m sure she’d be so proud.

Do you understand how this life creation thing works? But for hormones, you could have been born, not ol’ Ranier the Internet mountain man, but Rani the woman. You are the gender you are due to some more or less random signal to flush your mom’s uterus with a particular mix of hormones at a particular time, and you think you’re somehow entitled to treat 50% of Americans as second-class citizens. 

You can too get pregnant from scissoring! 
Besides, she might want to have Doogie Houser’s kid someday!

Really? Rachel can’t make babies? I’m pretty sure you can get pregnant without having sex. 

Just shows how crazy the righties are.  

Rachel would know how a uterus works seeing as how she has been neck deep face first in so many of them.  

I loved it when she end the segment “And it tastes like fish.”

thank you rachel..women unite! tell these radical men that if they infact support such ideas and ban any type of birth control for us women then I say again UNITE… I guarantee that if we as wifes, girl friends have headaches for the next six months all of our men will come to their senses and abandon these beliefs. we have enormous power have we been soooo beaten up by the right wing verbal vomit that we have lost our courage to stand up..
where are all the straight news reporting women on this subject?  Just read some of these mens comments about rachel maddow, do they fear a female who intelligentlhy expresses herself or touches on sensitive subjects?  Hey gentleman where are your intelligent comments on these sensitive subjects? Is that the best you can do?  attack her lifestyle?  It’s worth repeating, Is that the best you can do??????

Rachel Maddow is a jackass.

This is weird. 

Not this story, or that it’s here on Mediaite. 

What’s weird is that, as good as this takedown of Mittens is, as much as it shows Romney in a cruelly ignorant light of his own choosing, in relation to the rights of half the country’s population, it’s quite arguably NOT the most outrageous bit of sensational television Maddow came out with tonight.In another segment, she called out the Koch bros, those Richie Filthy Rich oil & chemical inheriting barons, for being cheap, venal bullies, and basically said, Man up you COWARDS, if you want a fight, I’m right here ready to take you both and your combined 50 billion bucks on. She called them out for taking a total low blow at one of her producers, for getting a story on them correct. She taunted them, repeatedly, to man up & come on to her show & face her. Why wasn’t this put up here for comment? It would have caused an all-time knock-down drag-out FLAME-OUT battle in the comment pit, of the magnitude that normally only comes out for stupid crap about religion and fights to the death over pro-choice versus pro-barefoot and pregnant.

This guy,Randy Madcow, is nutier than a ten pound fruitcake left over from last Christmas. Why does he think  anyone needs a lesson on a woman’s uterus and how it works? He is so damn weird I almost think he is gay. Oh well, PMS/LSDnbc is jam packed with weirdos. I’ll stick with FOX News so I can get real news.

And La Skinner should know – he’s a Jackass fan!

And you haven’t? I detect some serious envy at work here.

Actually, I suspect she’d just laugh. They do look kinda funny.

And it was filling your dreams, too.

In fairness, she’s comparing her show to the entire line-up at Fox News, and on that standard, she’s clearly right.

I have a question, for any of this lunatic’s fans or for Miss Maddow herself. No kidding aside.

Why is she so concerned about birth control and uteruses? After all, she doesn’t need to use the first because she is never going to have a child in the second. Why all the concern?

It would be as if I were concerned about something that had nothing to do with me – like being a leftist lunatic like Pravda Rachel Maddow is.

“This is weird.”

You are so right, Rex – your post and its baloney is truly weird.
Congrats, however, on discovering how nutty you truly are.

<>

It sounds like you don’t know where the uterus is, it may be time for a anatomy class

“Rachel Maddow is a jackass.”

That’s a terrible thing to say. Why cast aspersions on jackasses?

Says one of the 14 idiots willing to sit and watch her terrible show.

They once asked Miss Maddow if she had ever seen a dick before.

When she said she didn’t think so, the reporter said, “But, wait – didn’t you just see Ed Schultz in the hallway?”

Yeah so lets kill them.

The woman who asked Romney that question in Iowa looks like a Man Cow.

Not a Mad Dow…a Man Cow.

And I hate comparing poor cows to that whale.

Crazy is that you could crush the school of a baby in a womb and then suck it out with a vacuum.

Maybe she could use a Turkey Baster.

Just like Pravda and al Jazeera are “news organizations.”

“Next week, Ed Shultz talks about his dick using a sippy straw.”

I thought Ed Schultz used his dick AS a sippy straw.

Carlin was extremey wrong in that regard.

Sarah Palin is pro life and pretty hot. Hillary is pro choice and I would sooner stick my ding-a-ling in a blender than have sex with her.  Also, not many straight women would rather have sex with Barney Frank than Mitt Romney, i’m guessing.  

There are a million more examples just based on pure looks. If Carlin meant it on an ideological level, then he was just playing to his liberal audience.

 Do you really not understand why a person would be concerned about women’s rights? Lesbian women, straight men, everyone should probably be concerned about women’s rights.

extremely*

Why?

You strike me as mentally ill. There’s help if you need it, pal.

To be fair, Rachel hangs out with the same crowd who like to hang out in parks and rape each other in tents. Maybe she sees the writing on the wall, and doesn’t want Mittens saddling her with a hippy rape baby.  

Why do they respond when they clearly know they are wrong, and as if I care about their inane rants? Oh, that’s right – they want to show they are filled with hate! Let the hate go! You must be a rabid Madcow watcher.

“It would be as if I were concerned about something that had nothing to do with me”

Jeez, just tell us how many friends and family you DON’T have, why don’t cha!

“ I’ll stick with FOX News so I can get real news.”

hee hee

LOL

Pitiful lil’ thangs, ain’t they?!

If only I could abort your dumb ass…

LOL

Actually, she can indeed choose to becomoe pregnant, maybe not that all natural way us straight folks do. Regardless, the point is made, and it doesn’t need to be made by a straight woman, hell if a man wanted to make this point I would be okay with that too.

Yes all my lesbian friends think that my daughter is “icky”…smdh

Btw, just so you know that was sarcasm.

lots of lesbians couples have babies through many different means.  how ignorant can you be?

stick with your butch boyfriend mr. sean hannity. he’s a real american. 

Are the 7 billion of us just minor satellites orbiting the dim star of gideonssword79? Do you care for anything that doesn’t affect you directly? 

Yes BroadButtOnTheHorizon, FOX News also has a comedy show called Red Eye.I sure hope your little gay ‘hee hee’ doesn’t mean you attempt to get news from the idiots over at PMS/LSDnbc, cnn, abc, cbs, nbc, ny times, washington post, huff n’ puff, salon.com, the nation, newsweek, time, etc. Whew, if you are, then no wonder you are so deep in that dark, dank cave of yours. Come on over to FOX News where REAL Men and Gorgeous, Smart Women get REAL News!!!

If I was a leftist, I would push for a personhood amendment that would be determined at the voting age, get rid all of those freaks that believe in personal responsibility, law, and freedom is individual based-not collective.

Come on you leftists, get to work on your personhood amendment, that way you can get rid of all those you hate. Like babies.

Is LSDnbc planning on purchasing a Scanning Electron Microscope so the overfed redhead has at least a fighting chance of finding out if he even has a penis. I imagine LSDnbc will also need to get a 20 ton lift to pull his gut up so the SEM can tunnel in on his groin area. God, I bet that will be one sweaty job.

What is the “school of a baby”? Babies don’t generally go to school.

Being a Constitutional Libertarian, there are few things that make me a social conservative. I stand with the social conservatives on this issue. Life, Liberty and Property. The three things that the leftists want to control or takeaway.

How can the progressives call themselves progressives? They are actually regressive.

Repulsive bulldyke. She coined the term “lean forward”. We know who wears the rubber tools at her house.

Wow dude, after you fornicate, go start a dumpster fire why don’t cha!

Trying to find some consistent logic within the GOP morons is a waste of time.

Actually, some of us “lesbos” are perfectly fine with making babies.  We just don’t want to involve any penises in the process, thanks.

… You seriously don’t know the difference between a uterus and a vagina, do you?  LOL  I guess that’s what religion and abstinence-only sex education get you!

Maybe she’s concerned because reproductive rights are a human rights issue?  I know it’s hard to understand being FOR basic human rights when you’re such a bigot, but I can assure you that supporting even human rights that don’t affect you is a good thing.

http://tinyurl.com/3paazb2 (Pic of me laughing my ass off)

Thanks….your posts have me constantly ROTFFLMFAO as well…nw

Maddow has no sense of humor and always has a smirk. It’s scary how many men like her let alone women. She’s a lesbian elitist. Her and Keith Olbermann back to back were a disgrace but now Olbermann has been reduced to virtually no audience on Current TV.

What does Ratchet Maddow care? He ain’t having kids.

I think you did not get it. Maddow’s point is that you can not be in favor of birth control, and also hold that life begins at conception because conception often takes place before birth control takes effect.

In November 2012, I want MadCow to demonstrate how self immolation works.

http://tiny.cc/r1zzu

Have you ever noticed that the women so strongly in favor of abortion (eg. Maddow) nobody would ever want to f**ck in the first place?

Still dont understand why we care so much about another persons reproductive rights. It has no effect on anyone else except the the mother and father.  your lives are not better or worse because she chose to have an abortion.  Get a grip people.

Dude, have you ever even met any lesbians?  Lesbians LOVE babies!

And now you know why Rachel is bleeding viewers left and right.

Because she’s uglier than a sack of crapola?

Let’s see MadCow’s ‘smirk’ next November.

I’m a woman, married to a man.  Pretty traditional.  Only marriage for either of us, children together, the whole shebang.  But I’m concerned about the rights of others to have legally recognized marriages for same sex partnerships.  Why?  Because injustice anywhere is threat to justice everywhere.

I think it has much more to do with the fact that she’s incredibly stupid and oddly very satisfied with herself at the same time, i.e. she’s basically a pre-teen girl. Maybe she’d be better received in Twilight movies or something.

Oh wow, that was so witty. It didn’t sound like you stole that from a dead comedian at all.

I agree with you.  It is the person’s choice and my choice not to have to pay for it.  

I don’t care what anyone else does with their reproductive organs.  
I do think that Rachel should have gone on and perhaps mentioned the controversy (not left or right but medical) about some of the pills.  She had the perfect opportunity to do so.  

I used to like her when Carlson had her on.  Back then she presented herself as a bright articulate left winger.  She left all the theatrics at the door.  

I suppose since she is far from flashy, she was told to emote more.  With her eye rolls, hand gestures and body language, you know immediately what her position on an issue is.  She is the left version of Hannity, except Hannity is good looking and has opposing views on and he doesn’t go for the theatrics.  
I enjoy him but sometimes wish he’d tone it down a bit (every time I say that, he sort of does for a while).

Thank you for putting your ignorance and bigotry on display for the whole world to see.  Your parents must be so proud of you.

Your belief that a cross-eyed theocrat with an out of date hairstyle is “hot” says much about your taste in women, none of it good.

People who have no response to a particular person’s logic (or any person’s logic, really) have a tendency to attack that person’s looks. You may as well post, “I have nothing substantive to add to this conversation.”

I find it hilarious that Mediaite didn’t bother to fact check this woman at the Sioux City town hall or Rachel Maddow (who is generally full of shit) because they’re completely and utterly false on every level.

First of all, 98% of women aren’t using birth control. That’s completely ridiculous, she’s basically claiming that most elderly women and little girls use birth control. Are you kidding me? Rachel Maddow and Mediaite took this claim at face value? Fewer than 10% of women in this country use oral contraceptives, even fewer get the shot. That’s a long way to go until you’re at 98%.

Second, her claim that most birth control methods don’t prevent conception is a complete crock of shit and is obvious propaganda. Mechanical prophylactics prevent semen from reaching the ovum and spermicide does just that – kills sperm. The pill and the shot prevent ovulation, they’re so effective because there’s no damn ovum to seed in the first place and the shot even stops the uterus from shedding, i.e. no periods. The only forms of birth control that are designed for *possible* post-conception are the morning-after pill, which is dangerous and causes hormonal imbalances when frequently used because it IS nothing but hormones, and drugs like Yaz and Yasmin which are off the market because they werefucking killing women.

Third, Maddow went further off the deep end by saying that a life-at-conception amendment would result in murder investigations — which is unbelievably stupid. Murder requires intent; fertilized eggs are naturally discharged all the time — IT’S NATURAL. The odd spot here would be morning after pills, since they possibly discharge an egg that’s been fertilized… but it may not be fertilized, so how would you charge someone with attempted murder if there’s no life in the first place? So the only form of currently legal birth control that would probably be made illegal is the morning-after pill. Oh yeah, and abortion which most people already acknowledge is murder anyway.

Thanks for the lesson, Maddow. Amazing that the only sexual organ you personally deal with you don’t know shit about.

I know lesbians and bisexual women who have all successfully aimed at getting pregnant. (Big surprise I know). What kind of a *pussay* anyway is too frail to muster a schematic image of the organs at the core of the birth control debate? There’s sth about debating legislating an issue while refusing to look at it even in the most clinical form that just seems a little pathetic to me.

And everything you’ve ever said or posted is purely original?  Sure it is.

You are a sexist jerk.

You are a sexist jerk.

You are a sexist jerk.

You are a sexist jerk.

And you are a jerky sexist.

You are a semen ingestor.

“I would sooner stick my ding-a-ling in a blender than have sex with her.”

Please do so – we don’t need any more “Stupid and Proud of It” morons running around!

Wow…I’m a liberal…and I thought that was annoying…..Rachel..put a sock in it.

Maddow has a new sponsor ” snap on tools”

Maddow is a vile woman.

Finally, Maddow is where she belongs, in  a “Man Cave”.

I know there’s a message in there some where? Could you share it with us.

I thought the issue was conception?

Let’s look at the facts about dead-beat dads, and most especially, dead beat mothers, that never seem to get mentioned. Fact is, women are 4-5 times more likely to be parental dead-beats than men. Of course, that does not excuse men, I’m only pointing out the need to factually correct.
I’m of the opinion that what a woman does concerning abortion is between her, the father, God, and her doctor, with the only exception being late term abortion. It is no one Else’s business but, it is also NOT the responsibility of the taxpayer!! You want an abortion, pay for it yourself!

Isn’t Madcow that rather prissy and ugly wannabe man on MessNBC?  I mean being a it’s gender, what could a he/she possibly know about an uterus?

We, unlike Liberals, do understand the whole Gay rights thing but, unlike you and the rest of the sheeple, we tend to believe Gays are not asking for rights, they are asking for SPECIAL RIGHTS. But, I digress, the issue is not about Gay rights it’s about conception and abortion. Conception is best answered by the medical definition, and abortion is matter between a woman and her God.

How true, they belong to the “The Ugly and Disgusting Club.”

She says that Romney is not answering any questions in the media about this.  That’s because NO ONE IS ASKING HIM.  Because NO ONE REALLY CARES! 

Except Rachel Maddow and her 16 viewers.

Most of us pro-lifers are aware that there is a “morning after” pill, and many call it a “mini abortion”.  Her point of studying into it is a valid one.  But she takes an Olympian leap from Romney’s “life begins at conception” position to “Mitt is anti-birth control.”  Shilling for triple-digit viewers.

I’ll put you down as pro-choice. Well done.

The consistent logic is, that we all detest you leftist idiots.

Women’s rights to you and your ilk is first and foremost killing the unborn, everything else is secondary.

Maybe because even those of us who run no chance of getting pregnant through “traditional” means actually care that straight ladies would like to engage in intimate activities without then having to have a child as a result.  

Also, being female, we do understand that laws like this are meant to do nothing more than control a woman via her biological makeup.  And that should be reprehensible, no matter what your gender or sexuality.  

Why is this even a question?  Seriously.  I’m not black, but I care about the problem of racism.  I’m not a child, but I care about the problem of child poverty and abuse.  I live in the Global North, but I care about hunger and exploitation and health issues in the Global South.  Maybe part of the problem is that people seem to think it has to affect them personally before they care.  

How is demanding a right that everyone else enjoys asking for SPECIAL rights?  If straight people have it, but gay people don’t, is it special for straight people?  Oh wait, I guess it is.  Straight people consider themselves special and entitled to rights that gay people are not.  

So who wants special rights again?

Wow.  What a stunningly intellectual reply to a woman’s legitimate question.  Oh wait…

Awwww, i’m sorry you’re mad, but it’s not Sarah’s fault you’re fat and ugly and don’t have a boyfriend.

Gay marriage is a stupid issue. You’re only riled up about it because pop culture tells you to be. You’re a dumbass.

You’re a repetative moron.

And how does someone’s right to own an assault rifle effect you?

Too bad, someone did with your Mom.

Too bad she was not pro-choice.

Could we please get back to Romney?  His grandpa had dozens of “wives”, but that is not under discussion here.  Try to keep comments to the subject which is -  Is Romney for or against abortion and does he know where babies come from?

Obama’s father was a polygamist.  Can we talk about that as well?

I wonder if Maddow masturbates on the air while sniffing a can of tuna fish?
That would explain her facial contortions.

I wonder if Maddow masturbates on the air while sniffing a can of tuna fish?
That would explain her facial contortions.

I doubt that Romney doesn’t understand. He’s pandering plain and simple and doesn’t want to delve into the real life details that complicate pandering. It’s like the often promised, never seriously considered constitutional amendment about marriage. You say something to placate a certain group of voters even though it’s kinda stupid and you have no intention on really delivering.

Perhaps sexist…but honest.
You DO know what honest is?

That would take considerable laughing…..

I see a lot of folks here are missing their asses…..I think they are all in the White House

Repulsive bulldyke. She coined the term “lean forward”. We know who wears the rubber tools at her house.

Demonstrably untrue.

Pravda and Al-Jazeera aren’t really comparable organizations in the modern era. Al Jazeera English is a pretty valuable resource for the Western world, frankly.

So, should I assume from this ad hominem attack with no comment on the substance of her remarks that you support or have no opinion on banning birth control? I don’t know about you, but for all the aggressively rude masculinity you seem to be trying to exude, casual sex with women will be a lot harder in such an America. To say nothing of the diseases, unwanted pregnancies…

Well, Barney Frank is gay.

There are WAY more single mothers who are successful, where do you get your facts? Yes there are some dead beat mothers but the VAST majority of dead beat parents are fathers! Potential dead beats? I don’t know a single woman in my life who are or would ever be a potential dead beat mother. But I know plenty of men who are dead beats and other men who, if they impregnated someone, would be “potential” dead beats. And just so you know, NOBODY is pro-abortion, people are pro-CHOICE. I personally wouldn’t get pregnant to begin with BUT if I were raped then you better not take my abortion choice away, men leave your damn laws off my body!! But for a stupid teenage girl who didn’t take precautions and wants an abortion? That’s still her choice… not one I would make (I would deliver and put up for adoption) but it doesn’t matter what YOU think, it’s HER body and HER choice!!

Why do you even care? It’s not your child and none of your business. Shut the f*ck up.

AT least her turkey baster won’t be a loud mouth bitch like you!

How would she know?

Lots of gay people have children. Why don’t you know this ? The fact that you don’t disqualifies you from any intelligent discussion on the subject. BTW, lots of gay people want to get married too, in case you haven’t heard.

LOVE YA RACHEL!!!:)  REALLY FUNNY!! Not for anything I’m straight. She has a superb way of telling it how it is!!

Well anyone want to know the difference between Liberals and Conservatives? Really?

Maddow, you can spot em can’t ya? Why do lesbians want nothing to do with a man, but look like one?Curious I say.

You aren’t in touch with your feminine side and your insecurities are showing!!!!

Rachel Maddow is a brilliant journalist. 
Some men Brian are very insecure around women like that.
Get some counseling.  This can be overcome.
J

Let’s just cut right to the chase. You want to control fetuses? Stop controlling the woman’s body and go right to the source.

Make a law that makes it illegal for a man to place his penis in a woman’s vagina unless it is for the express purpose of procreation.
(and anyone who cannot handle the words penis or vagina has no business making laws that govern the occassional results of the combination of these 2 bits of anatomy.)
If a fetus results then the man must take complete responsibility for the woman carrying his baby and full child support until the child is 18 years old.
(We have genetic testing that can clearly indicate *who* is responsible.)
Nip the problem PRE-bud!

The minute laws are created that affect MEN the rhetoric will change. This folks is THE last woman’s rights issue in America.

Witch night?

One of my favorites!

She’s my dream woman, and given who she is – I think she’d be perfectly glad you’re uninterested.  :D