The democrat party needs to ‘ bobbit ‘ this little Weiner.

Keep spinning Dick! Peepee gate continues!

I have been convinced of Weiner’s innocence here, but it is troubling to hear him waffle on this question — which should be a very easy one for him to answer.

Alright folks, Ms. Ballbricker was right, she could tell if it was his, and she was RIGHT!

If you need any further proof, just ask the nano technologist.

he doesnt know his own junk? lol

My system was hacked.

Then we need to know who the criminal is that did that.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Keep spinning Dick! Peepee gate continues!

Better known for “general weinerization”

“You know, I can’t say with certitude. My system was hacked. Pictures can be manipulated. Pictures can be dropped in and inserted.”

* snicker *

All you degenerate libs need to get down on your knees so you can ( gag ) personally apologize to Andrew Brietbart. Aaaahhhhh.

Fact: Weiner’s weiner story is still a big story until you see the photo’s. Hahahahahahahaha…..

Maybe his mother could help with the identification.

OMG…This guy is imploding. What a LIAR!!!

Just like Nixon….The cover-up is what brings elitists down!!!

If he would have just came out from the beginning and said it was him and that he is sorry and that he has had a long talk with the wife and they are going to work through this together and that he is sorry about everything and……yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah………….this whole story would go away!!

Not now, his lying and cover-up will bring him tumbling down…haha

Are we still going to maintain that Breitbart set Weinerhacker up? Are we still going to pretend Weiner didn’t take a picture of his junk and tweet it to his online honey? it’s those crazy, vengeful conservatives trying to distract an important congressman from do the important work of the people? Are we still going with that?

By tomorrow, he will have found a friend, cousin, uncle, brother, old college roommate, John Stewart, etc. to take the fall for him and say it was they, not the upstanding Congressman from NY, who took the picture and sent it out as a joke. Anyone want to bet me this won’t happen?

Soooooooooooooooooooooo!?

All liberals and leftists line up and kiss AB’s arse.

Line will begin to the left. LOL

Ramrants says:

Are we still going to maintain that Breitbart set Weinerhacker up?

Of course they are. Saul Alinsky taught them well. RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Maybe his mother could help with the identification.

Few mothers, perhaps other than your son’s mother it would seem by your suggestion, would be able to do this.

I’m sorry for this folks, but:
WHAT A WEENIE !!

Ramrants said:
Are we still going to maintain that Breitbart set Weinerhacker up? Are we still going to pretend Weiner didn’t take a picture of his junk and tweet it to his online honey? it’s those crazy, vengeful conservatives trying to distract an important congressman from do the important work of the people? Are we still going with that?

By tomorrow, he will have found a friend, cousin, uncle, brother, old college roommate, John Stewart, etc. to take the fall for him and say it was they, not the upstanding Congressman from NY, who took the picture and sent it out as a joke. Anyone want to bet me this won’t happen?

You have to admit, Breitbart is so despised and discredited that people will believe it whether he did it or not.

Perhaps Rep. Weiner should speak more with a seemingly more “friendly” network like MSNBC as he did here.

SO he would answer more direct questions presented to him! Keep going, keep going…there are more questions rep. Weiner that reporters whnt to ask AND have answered. “Not with certitude”, is a step in that direction.

Maybe Weiner knows the person who did it. The fact that he can not deny that the picture is of him, is very strange. Do we have a crime involved? Not unless Weiner presses charges against the person who accessed his account without permission.

RRK or Sam M. should know.

Val, lying to autorities would be considered obstruction of justice. If he’s telling the Feds he was hacked and he knows he wasn’t, that would be a crime. But perhaps that why it appears he hasn’t filed a complaint. He knows if he does and it’s a lie, he’s in even bigger trouble. We’ll see what BillO has to say tonight.

I’ve never faulted Breitbart for the initial reporting, it was the manner with which he rode the horse after the first report that should cause him pause, but though I haven’t yet seen the clip, I’m not sure how the idea that someone may have stolen a pic from Weiner’s Facebook proves that it wasn’t a hack.

The Congressman even tweeted that his Facebook had been hacked. A lot of people wondered how that extended to Twitter, but until the story hit Breitbart’s web, if the tweet was quickly deleted and his password Twitter password unchanged, there would’v been no way for him to know.

Not to mention that as I’ve said in a previous thread, it appears that you can change your Twitter password in one device or screen and any other device (or screen) that had been previously logged-in would still be able to tweet. So if a hacker had changed the Congressman’s password — something which I doubt — he would’ve still been able to tweet from his phone and if the offending tweet had been deleted, he wouldn’t have known that it had been sent.

Hmmmmm, just a question about liberals, democrats, socialists, communists, immoral people, progressives (but I repeat myself) etc, do you think that just MAYBE we the people should elect HONORABLE people to represent us?

If Weiner can LIE to cover up such a SMALL thing as this, could he be bribed and blackmailed for other things?

There is a REASON that the military foments a HONOR code, otherwise they can be manipulated by outside sources.

But NOW, we have people in government that have NO MORALS OR HONOR! Do you libs even see any problem with that?

Magister, don’t you find it a bit odd that he claims to have been hacked, but had access to get all of the offending material off immediately? If you are hacked, you would probably lose control of your twitter for a bit. He didn’t.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Val, lying to autorities would be considered obstruction of justice. If he’s telling the Feds he was hacked and he knows he wasn’t, that would be a crime. But perhaps that why it appears he hasn’t filed a complaint. He knows if he does and it’s a lie, he’s in even bigger trouble. We’ll see what BillO has to say tonight.

Not much partisan supposition there, folks!

Frankly, I thought you had to lie to the authorities. I didn’t know it counted if you lied to the autorities. Learn something new every day ….

Was it obstruction of justice when Brigham Young lied to the federales about Mountain Meadow, I wonder?

uhoh. when they start scratching their heads and saying they don’t know nothing about nothing.. time to worry.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Magister, don’t you find it a bit odd that he claims to have been hacked, but had access to get all of the offending material off immediately? If you are hacked, you would probably lose control of your twitter for a bit. He didn’t.

No. Not at all. When WrLter did that to me I was able to go in and bounce him off at once.

It is becoming obvious that it is his “junk”, Weiner is choking on his cover-up.

DavidKramer said:
should elect HONORABLE people to represent us?

are there any out there?

Magister said:
I’ve never faulted Breitbart for the initial reporting, it was the manner with which he rode the horse after the first report that should cause him pause, but though I haven’t yet seen the clip, I’m not sure how the idea that someone may have stolen a pic from Weiner’s Facebook proves that it wasn’t a hack.

The Congressman even tweeted that his Facebook had been hacked. A lot of people wondered how that extended to Twitter, but until the story hit Breitbart’s web, if the tweet was quickly deleted and his password Twitter password unchanged, there would’v been no way for him to know.

Not to mention that as I’ve said in a previous thread, it appears that you can change your Twitter password in one device or screen and any other device (or screen) that had been previously logged-in would still be able to tweet. So if a hacker had changed the Congressman’s password — something which I doubt — he would’ve still been able to tweet from his phone and if the offending tweet had been deleted, he wouldn’t have known that it had been sent.

So are you then agreeing with Rep. Weiner that he was hacked? Or, still don’t know? Anything you could think of that would expose the facts and truth?

Liberal Tormentor said:
Royal Dimwit, maybe you could give Dick a few lessons on being an effective liar. He could use some professional help.

I’m not the one who said ranches in Laredo were being invaded and occupied by Mexicans, Michelle-in-Utah.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
You have to admit, Breitbart is so despised and discredited that people will believe it whether he did it or not.

He is not discredited. The leftist media complex is out to ATTEMPT to discredit anything he reports because he exposes them and their bias. They’re terrified and angry and will stop at nothing to ATTEMPT to discredit any and all AB reports in order to continue their coordinated assault of conservatives and navel gazing of liberals.

AB discredits the leftist media complex, not the other way around.

im waitng for all the honeys to come out of the woodwork now and claim the weiner has been doing the nasty with them. lol. for the love of democrats…. lol.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Few mothers, perhaps other than your son’s mother it would seem by your suggestion, would be able to do this.

Do you have a link to back your statement up or shall we just concede that you confused speculation with facts…something liberals tend to do frequently!!!

justanotherconservative said:
im waitng for all the honeys to come out of the woodwork now and claim the weiner has been doing the nasty with them. lol. for the love of democrats…. lol.

The Weiner better hope they are all over 18 or this picture will be the least of his problems!!!!

he did it, big deal, move on and just remember what a d@ck he is

Certitude??? Is that like Refudiate??? OK lefties… go nutz about what a moron POS he is due to saying “Certitude”. I’ll hold my breath…

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
You have to admit, Breitbart is so despised and discredited that people will believe it whether he did it or not.

Really??? Like Andrea Mitchel is “so despised and discredited” due to her false Rolling Thunder Sarah Palin story? Mitchel was so anxios to get a slam piece on air she forgot a little thing like FACTS. And don’t make me go old school with CBS and Dan Rather…

Now Weiner just threw all his defenders under the bus , ran over them , circled around and ran them over again . And they’re still trying to find a defense for him .

The truth would be nice . Anytime . It’s about three o’ clock in Washington . It’s almost noon in Seattle .

Liberal Tormentor said:
Magister, don’t you find it a bit odd that he claims to have been hacked, but had access to get all of the offending material off immediately? If you are hacked, you would probably lose control of your twitter for a bit. He didn’t.

First of all, my theory has been that if the Congressman’s Twitter was hacked, the “hacker” probably deleted the tweet because the Congressman made no mention of a Twitter hack and all they needed was the offending tweet to be added to the tweetcongress.com archive to become part of the record. Especially, if they used a different device to send the tweet than the Congressman was using that night.

Also, if they had changed the Congressman’s password, then he could more easily claim a hack because the offending tweet would’ve remained. Also, as Tommy has suggested somewhere, if the Congressman’s password had been changed, all he would’ve had to do would be to ask for an emailed password and he would’ve regained instant access (unless the hacker also changed his email, but that may require double verification… I haven’t checked)

(Now of course, it appears that the tweet could’ve been sent through yfrog, but you just log into that using Twitter, so the same Twitter stuff applies.)

Also as I said in my initial comment to this thread and have said on another, if you’re logged into Twitter on your phone and on your computer, if someone were to change your password on their computer, the devices being used by the Congressman would still be logged-in, so they wouldn’t need the new password. Though again, I’ve operated all along that if there was a hacker, they wouldn’t have changed any passwords because the fact that the Congressman kept tweeting has allowed others to argue that he may not have been hacked.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
I’m not the one who said ranches in Laredo were being invaded and occupied by Mexicans, Michelle-in-Utah.

So NO ranchers in Texas have been killed my illegals? You live in Texas, not me, so if you say no I’ll just have to buy it.

Rep. Weiner: ‘I Can’t Say With Certitude’ When Asked If Twitter Picture Was Of Him

…OH, PALEEEEEE !!!! that photo certainly could not be of the weiner – for a lunatic-left d-cRAT socialist, one needs an electron microscope at full magnification to see their teeny tiny appendage.

brownsound said:
He is not discredited. The leftist media complex is out to ATTEMPT to discredit anything he reports because he exposes them and their bias. They’re terrified and angry and will stop at nothing to ATTEMPT to discredit any and all AB reports in order to continue their coordinated assault of conservatives and navel gazing of liberals.

AB discredits the leftist media complex, not the other way around.

Uh huh!

tatboy said:
Certitude??? Is that like Refudiate??? OK lefties… go nutz about what a moron POS he is due to saying “Certitude”. I’ll hold my breath…

Actually, “certitude” is a noun meaning the state of being or feeling certain. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary, Desk Top Edition, Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Incorporated (1997), p. 135.

justanotherconservative said:
are there any out there?

Not many, there are a few. Santorum stands by his beliefs even though it hurts him politically. Ron Paul the same, Sarah Palin the same, West the same, Cain the same.

There are not many that do not flip flop on issues of their beliefs, you can count them on your hands and toes.

I stand by ANYONE that can stand on their beliefs, even if 90% of the country believes opposite. See, there are not many of those and about NONE that will state that fact.

Look at any Democrat that states their beliefs and stands by them. There are NONE except maybe Bernie Sanders. Otherwise the Democrats are just a bunch of lying hypocrites, they will say anything to hold their power.

On the Republican side, there is only a handful, like Ron Paul or Jim Demint. They do not CARE about the populace beliefs, they stand by their convictions and state them openly, even in prevailing tides against them.

Honor, duty and belief is a failing commodity nowadays. That is why I will stand with anyone that holds those beliefs before withering odds. Of course if they turn against those beliefs, I will throw them to the wolves, just like we the people threw Bush to the wolves. Bush stood by his beliefs but FOLDED under the storm, that is NOT what I want. If I wanted a RINO or a COMMUNIST, I would have voted for Obama. I would have voted for Feingold. I would have voted for Barret (vs Walker).

We always hear about compromise, that compromise gets us EXACTLY where we are now, tyranny and corruption.

Compromise is always about giving more power to government and taking it from the individual. No more compromise, no more retreat!

I don’t measure a man’s success by how high he climbs but how high he bounces when he hits bottom.
Americans love to fight. All real Americans love the sting of battle.
Always do everything you ask of those you command.
George S. Patton

Magister, how you can continue to defend Dick is beyond me. I wish Conservatives got the benefit of the doubt that liberals do.

Hey . Who doesn’t have a picture like that for inventory and insurance purposes ?

ANDREW BREITBART RUMOR SWEEPS THE WEB!

Uh oh Andrew … looks like someone’s been ‘monitoring’ you too.

http://waronignorance.net/index.html

OUCH!

tatboy said:
So NO ranchers in Texas have been killed my illegals? You live in Texas, not me, so if you say no I’ll just have to buy it.

You had to be there. Michelle-in-Utah picked up some rag from some hack in San Diego claiming that bands of Mexicans had crossed the border and were seizing ranches in and around Laredo. She repeated it constantly, even after the Webb County Sheriff, the Texas DPS and the Texas Rangers discredited and debunked the story.

cjd ohio 1 says:
he did it, big deal, move on and just remember what a d@ck he is

After he’s run out of town like Conservatives are, I’ll move on.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Magister, how you can continue to defend Dick is beyond me. I wish Conservatives got the benefit of the doubt that liberals do.

Always the victim ….

RazorsEdge said:
So are you then agreeing with Rep. Weiner that he was hacked? Or, still don’t know? Anything you could think of that would expose the facts and truth?

I lean toward “hacked” because there’s just too many holes or convenient coincidences that make it seem like a plot, plus though this may reveal something about me, but whenever someone has tried to get me to have questionable exchanges on AIM, Messenger or Yahoo!, they generally preface it with a “do you want to chat” and don’t just start talking dirty out of the blue.

One of the biggest jerks in Congress good to see him going thru such a tough time. What a scumbag.

Royal Dimwit says:

She repeated it constantly

Um don’t think so, but feel free to prove it.

Big Eddie said:
Now Weiner just threw all his defenders under the bus

Daily Kos and MSNBC certainly got thrown under the bus and they will continue to defend their Liberal Weiner.

Liberal Tormentor said:
cjd ohio 1 says:he did it, big deal, move on and just remember what a d@ck he is After he’s run out of town like Conservatives are, I’ll move on.

hey dont get mad at me, a liberal person on here told me republican have standards they fail to meet, and democrats have no standards, so…………………

Just resign weiner and get it over with. I hope your wife dumps you, too.

i could never be mad at you cjd! I’m just sick of the double standard.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Val, lying to autorities would be considered obstruction of justice. If he’s telling the Feds he was hacked and he knows he wasn’t

If someone accesses your account without permission that is, per se, “hacking”.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Royal Dimwit says:

She repeated it constantly

Um don’t think so, but feel free to prove it.

No need. I have absolute certitude you did so.

Now, shoo! You’re boring me.

By now we can fairly say that either Rep Weiner is engaging in an inappropriate relationship with a coed, or else he’s the most incompetent Congressperson at public relations we’ve ever seen.

LOOK ANTHONY…..I know what my ‘junk’ looks like in and out of boxer briefs….if it is you…my…my…my

Jaurez said:
Just resign weiner and get it over with. I hope your wife dumps you, too.

I have a feeling his wife would do the EXACT same thing as Hillary, she is not married to him for usual reasons, it is about power. That is what Democrats hold dear.

Liberal Tormentor said:
i could never be mad at you cjd! I’m just sick of the double standard.

it is a double standard

Royal Dimwit, while you’re looking for that, maybe you can find that evidence of me being a racist and a birther. Really, what’s taking you so long!

Well…that wasn’t a very good answer. I don’t see how Weiner will be able to give a satisfactory explanation to anyone but the most partisan lefties.

I didn’t say that wasn’t hacking, Val. I see no evidence that happened here except for Dick’s word. And really, what is that worth?

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Uh huh!

Actually, “certitude” is a noun meaning the state of being or feeling certain. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary, Desk Top Edition, Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Incorporated (1997), p. 135.

Interesting…. never hear Certitude over Certainty. Again, you learn something new everyday. :)

mikey970 said:
LOOK ANTHONY…..I know what my ‘junk’ looks like in and out of boxer briefs….if it is you…my…my…my

If it is, he’ll just get “Yeah, you go GET YOU SOME!!! WHOO-HOO!!!” cheering from the usual suspects.

This interview didn’t look much better than the one yesterday.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Ramran

Yes, I realize facts and truth are optional for some people.

DavidKramer said:
I have a feeling his wife would do the EXACT same thing as Hillary, she is not married to him for usual reasons, it is about power. That is what Democrats hold dear.

Yes, Hillary has already given her the “boys will be boys” speech by now. LOL!

I wouldn’t want to own up to that tiny little pickle either!

Yikes.

Kind of makes you feel for the guy. Oh wait, it actually doesn’t….

In other news, Tommy Christopher wipes egg off his face.

But laceyunderalls, Tommy says this is swinging in Dick’s favor. Love is blind!

Told ja’ on two or three threads already, the little shit sent the pic out!
I was wrong once, but it has been so long ago I can’t remember just
now what the subject was.
LOL. Kiss his ass goodbye!!!

Liberal Tormentor said:
Royal Dimwit, while you’re looking for that, maybe you can find that evidence of me being a racist and a birther. Really, what’s taking you so long!

Robert doesn’t like you. That’s proof enough for him.

Magister said:
I lean toward “hacked” because there’s just too many holes or convenient coincidences that make it seem like a plot, plus though this may reveal something about me, but whenever someone has tried to get me to have questionable exchanges on AIM, Messenger or Yahoo!, they generally preface it with a “do you want to chat” and don’t just start talking dirty out of the blue.

HA!

Some will not like, but…I’m surprised Rep. Weiner is doing pressers and making himself available. That’s somewhat a positive towards a Hack as he claims. He’s making himself available. But doesn’t exonerate him either. Just surprised.

BUT… doing that just keeping story more alive, especially with answers such as the “I can’t say with certitude”.

BUT if he just launched an investigation, Rep. Weiner could then stop talking to the press or with answers that I can’t comment on an ongoing investigation. Relieve some of the distraction he states he doesn’t want to do the peoples work by using an active investigation as a shield.

AND…spend more time doing the people’s work rather than spending his time talking to reporters about this!

It will really get interesting during Weiner’s next election. Weiner’s weinergate.

“Jon Stewart Goes To Bat For Rep. Anthony Weiner: ‘His D*ck Is Just Not That Big’”

Weiner made Stewart even stupider than usual . And what of his bigtime Tweet expert defender Tommy ?

Magister said:
I lean toward “hacked” because there’s just too many holes or convenient coincidences that make it seem like a plot, plus though this may reveal something about me, but whenever someone has tried to get me to have questionable exchanges on AIM, Messenger or Yahoo!, they generally preface it with a “do you want to chat” and don’t just start talking dirty out of the blue.

You lean towards “hacked” because you drink the Koolaid. Logical, deductive reasoning are obviously skills you don’t possess. I don’t blame you, though. I blame your public school education….where you were properly trained in the “correct way of thinking” and how to be a good little social activist. Tell me, do you use light or heavy starch on your brownshirts?

Big Eddie said:
And what of his bigtime Tweet expert defender Tommy ?

Tommy Christopher is so blinded by his biases, he will see nothing wrong.

rangel got away on the taxes, weiner will get away with this(though he did not do anything illegal), when you have no standards, you have no values to live up to

HAHAHAHA….hmmm….is that my pelvic area? I can’t say for sure. The bottom line is this is a prank and I have been hacked….but I want to get back to work and not talk about this anymore. Even if hacking is a crime….an especially grave one given I’m a U.S. Congressman…..

GUILTY.

Liberal Tormentor said:
I didn’t say that wasn’t hacking, Val. I see no evidence that happened here except for Dick’s word. And really, what is that worth?

We are not talking about national security, but a prank. Thatis what Weiner said from the beginning he thought it was. Still, there is no crime unless Weiner presses charges against someone for accessing his account without permission, etc.

“nothing more than a silly distraction.” I wonder if his wife feels this way.

Wow that doesn’t make any sense Weiner.

Val, I don’t think he has to give the OK for the feds to investigate. That’s why he’s being so careful with his answers, I think. He knows if he’s caught lying,it’s a crime. He wouldn’t last 5 minutes behind bars!

valkyrie101 said:
We are not talking about national security, but a prank. Thatis what Weiner said from the beginning he thought it was. Still, there is no crime unless Weiner presses charges against someone for accessing his account without permission, etc.

exactly, so if he presses no charges, there was no crime ie hacking, so he has to believe just on his word

valkyrie101 said:
We are not talking about national security, but a prank. Thatis what Weiner said from the beginning he thought it was. Still, there is no crime unless Weiner presses charges against someone for accessing his account without permission, etc.

So you have no problem if people in Congress have their personal accounts hacked? You think thats something that the federal government should just ignore?

Magister said:
I lean toward “hacked” because there’s just too many holes or convenient coincidences that make it seem like a plot, plus though this may reveal something about me, but whenever someone has tried to get me to have questionable exchanges on AIM, Messenger or Yahoo!, they generally preface it with a “do you want to chat” and don’t just start talking dirty out of the blue.

He’s just flailing about so badly, though. He has to know our salacious media would be on this like flies to sh*t, yet his responses to their queries have gotten increasingly worse. I think that if this story didn’t find its way back to the odious reptile Shitefart then Weiner would be looking even more guilty.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!

I hope this weiner gets what he deserves! Happy Weiner Wednesday, everybody!

The last thing weiner wants is an investigation.

Ha…certitude…definition: having greater certainty than circumstances warrant. What a buffoon! Yeah, boy! You keep on going down that road Weiner and we’ll keep on watching you step on your crank, so to speak.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Val, I don’t think he has to give the OK for the feds to investigate. That’s why he’s being so careful with his answers, I think. He knows if he’s caught lying,it’s a crime. He wouldn’t last 5 minutes behind bars!

You want the feds to investigate this? Well, I guess you are with Pablo on this, better have everyone involved drug tested too.

This is the type of story that makes you wish something really serious was happening that deserved coverage. I would hate to be a reporter on this case.

Val, you don’t think that a Congressman saying he was hacked warrants an investigation? There was one when Paliln was hacked. It’s a serious crime, IF it happened. You libs don’t want it investigated because you know whose door they will end up at and do does Dick.

jerrybobphil said:
So you have no problem if people in Congress have their personal accounts hacked? You think thats something that the federal government should just ignore?

I’m not in favor of an expanded federal government, and the nature of this matter is a prank, not a matter of national security. Why spend tens of thousands of tax payer dollars investigating a prank? I leave it up to the individual, Weiner, to file a complaint, or not.

valkyrie101 said:
You want the feds to investigate this? Well, I guess you are with Pablo on this, better have everyone involved drug tested too.

If people in Congress are claiming their personal private accounts were hacked I would hope the feds investigate it and find the creeps and charge them. And I don’t care if they have a (r) or (d) next to their names. Sadly it just looks like you don’t care because it might make a democrat look awful.

You know how GQ breaks down sexual proclivities between conservatives and libs? I’d love to see a study done on schlong size.

Would we see that particular correlation? Who knows.

But we do know that libs loathe competition. Either they have defective DNA or they were the small kid in high school that never made the team. And that carried forward to adult life.

That’s why they grow up to be bullies that do nothing more than scream ‘give me your money’.

valkyrie101 said:
I’m not in favor of an expanded federal government, and the nature of this matter is a prank, not a matter of national security. Why spend tens of thousands of tax payer dollars investigating a prank? I leave it up to the individual, Weiner, to file a complaint, or not.

then you believe weiners story on faith, fine…………….myself if a republican was in the same situation and said the same thing i would still believe they were lying, but good to know you would believe them too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIcSuyZjjIM

jerrybobphil said:
So you have no problem if people in Congress have their personal accounts hacked? You think thats something that the federal government should just ignore?

Someone logged into yfrog using his Twitter login. It’s not national security, no one has ever been arrested for the crime and that includes the time they hacked into a Twitter employee’s account, gained access to an admin panel that allowed them to send tweets as Fox News President-Elect. A crime for which Twitter did not contact law enforcement and at least initially, law enforcement did not contact them, instead Twitter called their lawyer and the incident resulted in an FTC penalty for them.

Otherwise, I said in a previous comment that my concern is mostly about how this incident will affect social networking and citizen journalism.

As I’ve said, I don’t fault Breitbart for the initial report because a story was brought to his attention and he posted it with tentative language. Though, now that his people have tried to change it into some kind of crusade, it says something different and it may backfire, which may not bode well for the next time one person has a story that they shop to media outlets.

And, as the Congressman says, the whole focus on who follows who, the lack of understanding and balanced reporting appears to be doing harm seems to be doing harm to the social media concept and how it’s used by politicians. I mean, Michele Bachmann has 48,000 followers and she follows 14,000; Should we be going through to see how many of those she follows are young men in their 20s and the ratio of young bucks to middle-aged women?

Why oh why can’t the former Governor of Alaska’s name be Sarah Vajayjay? Ive been dying to see that sockeye salmon!

valkyrie101 said:
I’m not in favor of an expanded federal government, and the nature of this matter is a prank, not a matter of national security. Why spend tens of thousands of tax payer dollars investigating a prank? I leave it up to the individual, Weiner, to file a complaint, or not.

I think you’re thinking a little to idealistically about our political system. This is Anthony Weiner and he’s being hounded about a story that started with Andrew Breitbart. If Weiner was totally innocent on this I think he would be coming after a lamprey like Breitbart with with enough legal firepower to have him drawn and quartered in Times Square. Instead he’s taking this meek “I just want to get back to work” routine?

Maybe I’m totally wrong here, but Weiner just keeps making this situation look worse.

It is very telling to me that Weiner has seized on Jeffrey Toobin’s “let’s not make a federal case of this prank” defense. Sorry, but Weiner doesn’t seem like the type of guy to let by-gones be by-gones especially with Andrew Breitbart involved and now that Breitbart has insinuated on CNN he has proof Wiener has iinappropriate relationships with underage girls. Weiner is in a fight for his political future, at least as it exists outside of being the congressman from Queens. Until he reports this alleged “hacking” of his official house of representatives twitter account I will assume he is not doing so because it is not true and he doesn’t want to face the risk of being indicted for making a false report to the FBI. For the same reason, if Weiner reports the alleged hacking to the FBI I will assume, until proven wrong, that he has made the report in good faith and that his account was hacked.

Frankly, based on the non-explicit explicit picture alone I’d be pretty meh about the whole thing. I’m sure he’d have hell to pay with his wife, but that’s not my business. But ,now that he may have lied about it I think it is a fairly big deal and will only gain momentum.

jerrybobphil said:
If people in Congress are claiming their personal private accounts were hacked I would hope the feds investigate it and find the creeps and charge them. And I don’t care if they have a (r) or (d) next to their names. Sadly it just looks like you don’t care because it might make a democrat look awful.

Its a private matter that requires under normal circumstances a complaint to be filed by the person effected.

valkyrie101 said:
Its a private matter that requires under normal circumstances a complaint to be filed by the person effected.

exactly………….so he was not hacked until he files a complaint

Watching you libs defend Dick is truly entertaining. Dick LOVES a good witchhunt. If he had truly been wronged, he’d grab on like a pitbull and not let go until the perp was behind bars and you know.

If this is the best answer he has then I’m afraid this is going to go badly for him.

Congressman Anthony Weiner says he definitely did not send the now famous picture through Twitter, however he can’t say for sure whether the photo is of him”

Translation: “Yes, I have been taking crotch pictures of myself!”

BTW, what happened to Tamron Hall? She looks horrible.

Weiner, when are ya going to send crotch pics to the 45,000 in your imaginary audience?

Weiner: “Someone broke into my house and took a picture of my crotch and then sent it from my Tweeter account. Woe is me!”

Oh man, if you’ve lost Ted/SarahP/GIrth/Garth/Sam, then you’ve lost the war.

cjd ohio 1 said:
then you believe weiners story on faith, fine…………….myself if a republican was in the same situation and said the same thing i would still believe they were lying, but good to know you would believe them too.

Weiner says he did not send the tweet or the picture and that someone accessed his account without permission. That seems more likely to me than he sending it, unless he got drunk or something. But the bottom line is that we are talking about a picture of an underwear covered penis that several media outlets are now showing for humor effect. This is not something like child porn. Its a prank. You want to waste tens of thousands of dollars on that? So much for cutting expenses and a more limited federal government.

Where is Tommy Christopher today?
The Weiner could really use some defensive spin action!!

Things are not looking to good for the Weiner….not sure if he can toe tap his way out of this one no matter how wide his stance is!!

im_lovin_it said:
This is Anthony Weiner and he’s being hounded about a story that started with Andrew Breitbart.

Wrong! It started when Weiner sent the picture.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Oh man, if you’ve lost Ted/SarahP/GIrth/Garth/Sam, then you’ve lost the war.

Ain’t that the truth!

valkyrie101 said:
Its a prank. You want to waste tens of thousands of dollars on that? So much for cutting expenses and a more limited federal government.

Yeah, Weiner is so, so important to the running of America that he can follow young coeds on Twitter and send them pics of his noodle.

Yeah, Weiner is always thinking of America.

Nobodys_Stooge said:
Why oh why can’t the former Governor of Alaska’s name be Sarah Vajayjay? Ive been dying to see that sockeye salmon!

How did this become about Sarah Palin?

Pavlov’s dog?

valkyrie101 said:
Its a private matter that requires under normal circumstances a complaint to be filed by the person effected.

So prank away people its all in good fun. Find your local politicians twitter accounts, facebook and have your fun. No problems here. Amazing how politics just blinds people.

notsofast said:
Ain’t that the truth!

It is what it is. Have a Big Gulp, a bag a chips and go easy on the meth.

cjd ohio 1 said:
exactly………….so he was not hacked until he files a complaint

I’m afraid it does not work that way.

A question here…Can Rep. Weiner’s hired private security firm request/receive FB, twitter and yfrog backup data without a police report? Can Rep. Weiner “authorize” release of that data just with his own? Given that data has since been deleted.

Without a police report, then invade on a hackers or victims private information?

valkyrie101 said:
I’m afraid it does not work that way.

proof

notsofast said:
Yeah, Weiner is so, so important to the running of America that he can follow young coeds on Twitter and send them pics of his noodle. Yeah, Weiner is always thinking of America.

Weiner denies sending the picture.

valkyrie101 said:
I’m afraid it does not work that way.

if you want to believe him on faith, i said fine…………..i dont

cjd ohio 1 said:
proof

Though his body lay motionless and cold, the man had not been shot because no one had reported the murder.

Val, Obama denies ever hearing Rev. Wright spew hate too, but that doesn’t make it true. Libs lie, it’s what they do.

Hey Val, Clinton denied having sex with Monica, does that mean you believed him too?

Weiner is as guilty as sin and his lawyers are giving him crappy advice, as well. He should just hurry up and resign before it gets even worse.

valkyrie101 said:
Though his body lay motionless and cold, the man had not been shot because no one had reported the murder.

bad comparison, how about some stole my car, robbed that store, then parked it back in my driveway

valkyrie101 said:
Weiner says he did not send the tweet or the picture and that someone accessed his account without permission. That seems more likely to me than he sending it, unless he got drunk or something. But the bottom line is that we are talking about a picture of an underwear covered penis that several media outlets are now showing for humor effect. This is not something like child porn. Its a prank. You want to waste tens of thousands of dollars on that? So much for cutting expenses and a more limited federal government.

1) Don’t you think the story is now whether someone hacked a United States congressman’s social media accounts not the picture itself.

2) Why would Weiner not be able to state with certitude it isn’t his junk in the picture unless he has taken selfies of his junk, and why would someone have a selfie of their junk if it wasn’t for sending to someone via some type of digital media? Do you really think he is sending pictures of his chubbie in brief’s to his wife?

3.) Why can Jon Stewart make a definitive negative identification of Weiner’s junk and Weiner can’t? America deserves an explanation of their relationship / j/k.

cjd ohio 1 said:
bad comparison, how about some stole my car, robbed that store, then parked it back in my driveway

but no i dont want to file a report

Liberal Tormentor said:
Hey Val, Clinton denied having sex with Monica, does that mean you believed him too?

Of course she did. She may not admit it but she did.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Val, Obama denies ever hearing Rev. Wright spew hate too, but that doesn’t make it true. Libs lie, it’s what they do.

Lying is quite prevalent among all politicians, not just dems. And some lies are worse than others. Ensign’s, for example, was much worse than anything Weiner has alleged to have done. True?

A lie is a lie Val. At least Ensign admitted to his.

YO! Check out this Anthony Wiener VID on YOUTUBE!!!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXczzjaJgYI

SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO FUNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNY!!!!!!

bovine, put a cork in it, k?

Off with his head ! ! !

Jaurez said:
Of course she did. She may not admit it but she did.

Those who know me here know that I voted Republican in every election from 1972 to 2008. No way I believed Bill.

Liberal Tormentor said:
A lie is a lie Val. At least Ensign admitted to his.

No he didn’t. He did a whole Clinton manuver.

valkyrie101 said:
No he didn’t. He did a whole Clinton manuver.

What will you say when weiner comes out and admits he posted the pic?

joebiner said:
2) Why would Weiner not be able to state with certitude it isn’t his junk in the picture unless he has taken selfies of his junk, and why would someone have a selfie of their junk if it wasn’t for sending to someone via some type of digital media?

If it’ll settle anything, I can send Weiner a micrometer to compare sizes with the one in the pic. Mics are great for measuring things down to 1 ‘tenth’ (1/10,000 inch (.0001″).

Weiner should ask Jon Stewart if that’s really his d*ck, because Stewart seems pretty intimate with Anthony’s Weiner in this video.

valkyrie101 said:
Weiner denies sending the picture.

Yeah. BJ Clinton denied Monica till he found out she kept
the Stained Blue Dress!

BUSTED!

obamabot, hypocrite much?

Just my Opinion said:
Yeah. BJ Clinton denied Monica till he found out she kept
the Stained Blue Dress!

You almost sound envious.

joebiner said:
1) Don’t you think the story is now whether someone hacked a United States congressman’s social media accounts not the picture itself. 2) Why would Weiner not be able to state with certitude it isn’t his junk in the picture unless he has taken selfies of his junk, and why would someone have a selfie of their junk if it wasn’t for sending to someone via some type of digital media? Do you really think he is sending pictures of his chubbie in brief’s to his wife? 3.) Why can Jon Stewart make a definitive negative identification of Weiner’s junk and Weiner can’t? America deserves an explanation of their relationship / j/k.

1. Weiner said from the beginning that the matter was a prank, that he did not do it, and that someone accessed his account without permission (i.e. he was hacked). But whether charges are filed is a matter of discretion on the part of the aggrieved person. Had this matter involved national security, you would be right, but it doesn’t. Its up to Weiner whether to file charges or not.

2. Perhaps Weiner has taken photos of his underwear clad penis. Its quite the rage these days. No crime, though. It has not been alleged that the photo was sent to minor children.

3. Since the penis was covered up perhaps Jon couldn’t properly identify it.

Sam M. said:
You almost sound envious.

a hummer from a fat chick, oh why the hell not

Jaurez said:
What will you say when weiner comes out and admits he posted the pic?

Then I would say there was sufficient proof to pin the matter on Weiner. But currently, most reasonable people would consider it unlikely that Weiner did that himself. And to jump to that conclusion is more a function of political partisanship than anything else.

Weiners Excuse!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SLifea3NHQ

Anthony needs to own up to what he’s done. He is always challenging others to do that. Come on Anthony…put your weiner where your mouth is.

valkyrie101 said:
Then I would say there was sufficient proof to pin the matter on Weiner. But currently, most reasonable people would consider it unlikely that Weiner did that himself. And to jump to that conclusion is more a function of political partisanship than anything else.

why would people consider it unlikely, really no insult,

cjd ohio 1 said:
a hummer from a fat chick, oh why the hell not

There ya go.

Sam M. said:
There ya go.

lol

joebiner said:
1) Don’t you think the story is now whether someone hacked a United States congressman’s social media accounts not the picture itself. 2) Why would Weiner not be able to state with certitude it isn’t his junk in the picture unless he has taken selfies of his junk, and why would someone have a selfie of their junk if it wasn’t for sending to someone via some type of digital media? Do you really think he is sending pictures of his chubbie in brief’s to his wife? 3.) Why can Jon Stewart make a definitive negative identification of Weiner’s junk and Weiner can’t? America deserves an explanation of their relationship / j/k.

I could believe he was taking pictures of himself in his undies for some personal reason. People do stupid stuff in the privacy of their own homes, stuff that would be humiliating if it were publicly divulged. But the problem for Weiner is, how did this picture, if it was intended to be private, get from some private medium to twitter? Did he store it on FB? Terribly stupid, even if you’re not a public official. Is he saying someone had access to his computer or blackberry? That’s a good enough excuse when the standard if proof beyond a reasonable doubt, but sadly (I am a fan of his and very disappointed in him), not in the media. I don’t see this ending well for him, no matter what he comes out with next.

The Silence!

With Rep. Weiner’s “I can’t say with certitude” answer, one could argue that is right in Drudge’s wheelhouse. Given his MO and fact this story now widespread across media outlets, just imagine the HL’s he would post.

Why the obvious ignoring the story? (unless there’s a post out there). Is there something he know’s the rest of us doesn’t? Or is he just messin with folks?

I said in a previous comment to this thread that the picture could’ve come from Rep. Weiner’s self-reported Facebook hack. The possibility also exists that after a jog or a bike ride, someone could’ve snapped a pic of the Congressman in his workout clothes and then, he wouldn’t be able to say with certitude even though the picture didn’t come from him.

Yeah, that’s lawyerspeak, but it’d still apply.

BTW: Where I might not have to repeat myself, here’s my most relevant comment to this post about the hack and my thought’s about the social media aspect of the story.

/self-reference

valkyrie101 said:
But currently, most reasonable people would consider it unlikely that Weiner did that himself.

Than I guess I’m not reasonable, because to me it sounds like he was behaving like a silly old man trying to get in some young girl’s pants. Unfortunately he hit the wrong key and pop! there goes the weiner.

Magister said:
I said in a previous comment to this thread that the picture could’ve come from Rep. Weiner’s self-reported Facebook hack. The possibility also exists that after a jog or a bike ride, someone could’ve snapped a pic of the Congressman in his workout clothes and then, he wouldn’t be able to say with certitude even though the picture didn’t come from him. Yeah, that’s lawyerspeak, but it’d still apply. BTW: Where I might not have to repeat myself, here’s my most relevant comment to this post about the hack and my thought’s about the social media aspect of the story. /self-reference

Look dude, I think I’m with you in that I really, really hope that Weiner has an explanation for this. But I’ve worn enough boxer briefs in my time to know that’s a pic of a guy in his undies. And the undies aren’t sweaty so he didn’t just get done working out. And, to paraphrase Veronica Cartwright in Anchorman, that’s an enormous erection. I don’t know what he was doing but it’s very hard to imagine he doesn’t know whether it’s him. And we’ve all seen enough people trying to get out of answering a question to know that’s what he was doing. Of course, as you’ve noted he’s perfectly willing to swear he didn’t send it – but I don’t think that’s going to be enough. As long as it’s a picture of him – and I can’t see any explanation but that it is – he’s not going to come out of this looking good.

Val says:

But currently, most reasonable people would consider it unlikely that Weiner did that himself. And to jump to that conclusion is more a function of political partisanship than anything else.

And anyone defending him is more a function of political partisanship than anything else. Heck, even Ted thinks he’s lying!

@Rgentum: Like the other Congressmen who have been involved or implicated in scandals, the ultimate judgement is up to his constituents. Sure, the media may hound him for a while and some internet pundits may use it as a slur in future discussions, but no crime has been alleged against him and it’s not an ethics matter, so eventually the conversation is just going to die down and quite possibly without a solution.

cjd ohio 1 said:
why would people consider it unlikely, really no insult,

Sure, he was like, “Yea I’m the wiener man, hey all you twits, check out my wiener, heh heh.” Yes, that is very likely.

RazorsEdge said:
The Silence!

With Rep. Weiner’s “I can’t say with certitude” answer, one could argue that is right in Drudge’s wheelhouse. Given his MO and fact this story now widespread across media outlets, just imagine the HL’s he would post.

Why the obvious ignoring the story? (unless there’s a post out there). Is there something he know’s the rest of us doesn’t? Or is he just messin with folks?

I was wondering the same thing. The only thing I can guess is that Drudge knows there are more photos out there or something more and he’s just waiting for Weiner to keep piling up the denials so it will have maximum impact when Drudge breaks them. Seems far fetched, I know, but I’m trying to figure out why Drudge hasn’t touched it.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Val says:
But currently, most reasonable people would consider it unlikely that Weiner did that himself. And to jump to that conclusion is more a function of political partisanship than anything else.
Tormentor says:
And anyone defending him is more a function of political partisanship than anything else. Heck, even Ted thinks he’s lying!

Read what I said. Have you ever heard of the notion of innocent until proven guilty? In this day and age, people picking up someone elses blackberry, or sitting down at their desk while they are away, or any number of circumstances where a person’s security may be down, lends to all kinds of fraudulent stuff flying around. My goodness, at least half of Pablo’s post’s are really being posted by his four year old, who know’s that daddy’s password is ***IMSOSILLY**.

valkyrie101 said:
Sure, he was like, “Yea I’m the wiener man, hey all you twits, check out my wiener, heh heh.” Yes, that is very likely.

people do stupid stuff all the time, watch you local news, and us men are not that smart sometimes

cjd ohio 1 said:
people do stupid stuff all the time, watch you local news, and us men are not that smart sometimes

example brett farve

cjd ohio 1 said:
people do stupid stuff all the time, watch you local news, and us men are not that smart sometimes

Perhaps you are right, but we do not persume that people do.

his phone, his twitter account, the rest is persumption

cjd ohio 1 said:
example brett farve

Yep, great example. But again, we presume innocence. That is why we so readily except the “I mispoke” defense, or the Newt “it would be wrong to believe what I said” defense.

cjd ohio 1 said:
his phone, his twitter account, the rest is persumption

No, we presume innocence until the evidence prooves otherwise. Right now the evidence is lacking to rebut that presumption. To be fair.

There will be no happy ending to this story, so to speak.

valkyrie101 said:
No, we presume innocence until the evidence prooves otherwise. Right now the evidence is lacking to rebut that presumption. To be fair.

the only evidence is his phone, his twitter account, there is no other evidence as of now

Rep. Weiner: ‘I Can’t Say With Certitude’ When Asked If Twitter Picture Was Of Him

Since Weiner isn’t able to identify himself let’s ask his wife.  Surely, she should know whether or not this is her husband’s junk.

valkyrie101 said:
Weiner denies sending the picture.

Yes, and that’s what is know as a lie!

valkyrie101 said:
3. Since the penis was covered up perhaps Jon couldn’t properly identify it.

Yeah, but I bet YOU could.

notsofast said:
Yes, and that’s what is know as a lie!

Could be, but usually we give people the benefit of the doubt until that fact is shown.

notsofast said:
Yeah, but I bet YOU could.

A regular denis miller.

cjd ohio 1 said:
the only evidence is his phone, his twitter account, there is no other evidence as of now

Other than Weiner saying he didn’t do it.

Azarkhan said:
Than I guess I’m not reasonable, because to me it sounds like he was behaving like a silly old man trying to get in some young girl’s pants. Unfortunately he hit the wrong key and pop! there goes the weiner.

Young girls pants?

valkyrie101 said:
Could be, but usually we give people the benefit of the doubt until that fact is shown.

yes true, but the only facts and evidence are his phone, his twitter account, there is not other facts or evidence

valkyrie101 said:
Other than Weiner saying he didn’t do it.

thats not evidence

valkyrie101 said:
Other than Weiner saying he didn’t do it.

or even a fact, its what he says

cjd ohio 1 said:
thats not evidence

wrong.

Of course it is evidence.

valkyrie101 said:
Of course it is evidence.

man i hope if i ever get in trouble that you have jury duty

i didnt do it, thats evidence wow

cjd ohio 1 said:
i didnt do it, thats evidence wow

So when someone testifies in his own defense, that is not considered “evidence” to you? Why?

valkyrie101 said:
So when someone testifies in his own defense, that is not considered “evidence” to you? Why?

did he testify, did he swear under oath, no……………you have to when you fill out a police statement, but he did not do that

cjd ohio 1 said:
did he testify, did he swear under oath, no……………you have to when you fill out a police statement, but he did not do that

if he signed a sworn statement yes, but he has not

but really, thanks for the back and forth Val

OxyCon said:
Weiner should ask Jon Stewart if that’s really his d*ck, because Stewart seems pretty intimate with Anthony’s Weiner in this video.

I thought O’Reilly’s confession was bad, but that takes the cake.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OI3IFo1YpNw

cjd ohio 1 said:
but really, thanks for the back and forth Val

Don’t mention it.

cjd ohio 1 said:
if he signed a sworn statement yes, but he has not

Its still evidence, sworn statement or not.

Well, here is something we DO know for sure.

Andrew Breitbart really has a knack for picken ‘em, right?!?

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/internet/mike-stack-weinergate-co-pilot-219073

I guess if one makes an open call saying “Hey fellow angry bigots! Send me whatever damaging trash you can and I will host it on my GOP sponsored site, so we can destroy the Left”, then you are bound to attract just a bit of crazy, right?

What other caliber of person would you summon when you hold up a perverted liar like James OKeefe as a model researcher?

But honestly, “Goatsred” doesnt look much different from any other deranged speed-freak in the tea-parties. I mean, for all we know, that could be BigEddie right there… they both use a lot of the same verbage.

Regardless, this grotesque freak was harrassing underage girls that were fans of Rep Weiner. And this is who Andrew Breitbart attracts by his venom. Now he is supposedly backing away from these folks.

Its karma… Breitbart has dished out so much hatred, heat and dishonesty, that the true face of the hard right has manifested through him as this ugly predator.

Oh, and remember how Dan Wolfe was SOOOOOO ready for an investigation?

Well, let me put it this way…. Remember what the GOP did to Newt when he talked about moderation?

Or What Sarah did to her commitment to Alaska?

well, it must be fashionable now—

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/06/leaked_emails_show_tip_to_breitbart_about_weiner_t.php

Thank you Andrew Breitbart for helping Wolfe and Stack sabatogue the public dialogue.

Just hope that you dont get charged as an accessory to child endangerment.