Early 2000′s looking at the pic quality & those coolers I’d go with mid 90s. Creepy stuff

sounds like maddow too

It can’t be Rachel- his camera didn’t break.

Creepy. 

If you’ve ever seen Rachel in person she would die to have that body. Her bottom half is disproportionate to the top half.

Have you lost your mind?
The woman did not want to be filmed. She did not consent to be filmed. She did not give you her consent to post the video here.

What part of decency don’t you understand?  (You’ve already answered that, by your actions.)

You’re no better than the jerk pervert.

Take it down.

Sick:

. . . you may feel a strong urge to put the lotion in the basket, lest you get the hose again . . .

**** (4/5).  You are on a roll.  Time to go in a bar and tell a young lady you are a writer.  Or go home and hug the wife.

You listen to Maddow? I watch most of her shows, and it does not sound like Maddow to me. This woman’s voice is deeper and does not have the creak or twang of Rachel.

The women doesn’t want to be on camera… now Mediaite is broadcasting this clip for the whole world to see….

Anyone who has seen Rachel in person knows that her butt isn’t that big. She’s very svelt from head to toe. Stupid controversy to start.

Well, Duh.  Susan is much bigger and older than that.

“but Mediaite has confirmed that the reluctant star of the video is not Rachel Maddow.”

I’m assuming this is shorthand for “In a panic I, Tommy Christopher, tearfully called up Rachel and asked her if this was her in the video. She assured me it was not, which stopped me from ingesting another Xanax, and asked if I was going to make our weekly barbeque. Relieved and calmed by  the fact that Rachel was safe from conservative attacks (or maybe it was the Xanax), I assured her I would be there and that I would bring last weeks transcripts of my articles that she can sign off on”

“We checked with the star of The Rachel Maddow Show, and thankfully, it wasn’t her.”

Glad those Xanax kicked in and “thankfully” you didn’t have a full blown panic attack over this.

You have quite the imagination.

We can surmise by the lack of rape threats that the cameraman is definitely not James O’Keefe. 

Gloves, when did you get a video camera?

She was in public fair game …as long as she is over 18n in thye state (which with that ass she obviously was) no harm …no foul…..keep the cameras rolling…..I don’t agree w it …but it’s the law…..say good night Gracy!

welcome to the good old USA….you guys and gals get pissed at this… yet we still have idiots marching at dead soldiers’ funerals in protests….I’m all for the1st amendment …but lets get a little clarity here….Hmmmm???…it’s a half naked chick on the beach ….what’s next ?,….she’ll be pissed if guys LOOK at her?…..think about it ladies!!!!….go back to the penthouse and lay out on the roof…same sun …no ogling eyes…..(point Made)…she wants to be on the sand …..(maybe not filmed….but I DON’T THINK SHE MINDS THE ATTENTION)…IMHO…..~5150-

svelt……..awesome word….kudos for having a vocabulary!….~5150

Sorry,son,  O’Keefe is interested in women only.

She looked good on her side from the back. Nicely curvaceous.

Who’s more creepy, the guy who shot the video or Tommy for posting it on Mediaite? I say both!!

The person who posted this story broke no criminal laws, as far as I know, and I didn’t suggest he did. He might get the chance to learn about civil liability for invasion of privacy, if we’re lucky. Ask yourself, “Why do all those television shows blur out the faces of people even though they’re out in public?”

I’m just talking about decency and respect, and the lack thereof.

How would you know that?

Because I tried, son. I tried. You libs are too busy on your knee pads to understand but I don’t even need pads, son. 

Winning. 

I think that was Gingrich looking for his next victim. errr wife

Posting this video is almost as skeevy as recording people on a clothing-optional beach without permission. However, had it BEEN Rachel, the ensuing reaction would have been priceless to watch (assuming the cameraman /footage survived).  Naked people can in fact inflict grievous bodily harm, given sufficient motivation. 

God that’s creepy…..is there any more footage?

Is Maddow stating, that is indeed her in the video?

The fact that its not Maddow was a no brainer!!

Both are creepy him and her. She is on a public beach topless and in a g string.  She knows that will bring attention to her. She knows guys will take photos of her. Should not be a big surprise to her. I bet if the guy was hot she would not say a word.

You tried it with O’Keefe?   Now we know the truth about you.  And you don’t even use knee pads, TMI!

When I saw the subject I knew tomtom was part of it.  No need to read what was written as we all know it’s BS.

Damn, you had such a good run here, but you broke the automatic banning rule! Buh-bye.

What is the “automatic banning rule” BTW ?

Good Question.

Nothing like waving your homophobic ignorance for all to see. Rachel is a fine looking woman. Just because she’s not buying what you’re selling doesn’t change that…son.

I *think* she was saying she wouldn’t be caught dead in a thong on a public beach.

Geee…  I interpreted that to mean he was vertically challenged.

This is South Beach. Everyone is topless in a g-string.