Let’s see what the guy had on his reading list;

Books:
I had favorite books: Animal Farm, Brave New World, The Wizard Of OZ, Aesop Fables, The Odyssey, Alice Adventures Into Wonderland, Fahrenheit 451, Peter Pan, To Kill A Mockingbird, We The Living, Phantom Toll Booth, One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, Pulp,Through The Looking Glass, The Communist Manifesto, Siddhartha, The Old Man And The Sea, Gulliver’s Travels, Mein Kampf, The Republic, and Meno.

and the video he favorited a video of someone, probably him…burning the US flag

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L1lsLU-kUw

If you look at the rest of his videos he was obviously crazy. I seriously doubt he saw Sarah Palin’s website or reads Daily Kos.

I could be considered liberal in my views and don’t like this DailyKOS nonsense. It’s merely adding gasoline to a fire. There’s no need to prove any points by doing this Markos. Sarah Palin should not have removed the page. It had nothing to do with the shooting. Removing it reinforces the narrative (false one) that it had something to do with the tragedy. It’s stupid.

Latin2 said:
Let’s see what the guy had on his reading list;

Books:
I had favorite books: Animal Farm, Brave New World, The Wizard Of OZ, Aesop Fables, The Odyssey, Alice Adventures Into Wonderland, Fahrenheit 451, Peter Pan, To Kill A Mockingbird, We The Living, Phantom Toll Booth, One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, Pulp,Through The Looking Glass, The Communist Manifesto, Siddhartha, The Old Man And The Sea, Gulliver’s Travels, Mein Kampf, The Republic, and Meno.

and the video he favorited a video of someone, probably him…burning the US flag

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L1lsLU-kUw

Based on the reading list it doesn’t seem like he was right or left, only affirms what I said; he’s a lunatic.

Gasket said:
I could be considered liberal in my views and don’t like this DailyKOS nonsense. It’s merely adding gasoline to a fire. There’s no need to prove any points by doing this Markos. Sarah Palin should not have removed the page. It had nothing to do with the shooting. Removing it reinforces the narrative (false one) that it had something to do with the tragedy. It’s stupid.

I think that she should have removed it, but I also recognize that it’s a bad move because it gives pundits license to politicize it.

Gasket said:
I could be considered liberal in my views and don’t like this DailyKOS nonsense. It’s merely adding gasoline to a fire. There’s no need to prove any points by doing this Markos. Sarah Palin should not have removed the page. It had nothing to do with the shooting. Removing it reinforces the narrative (false one) that it had something to do with the tragedy. It’s stupid.

Although the optics are terrible.

She should have had the brains to use a different symbol other than a bullseye. Another reason why she should cool her jets on running for the Presidential Office. She is unelectable.

Nothing should be removed. If you don’t want to be held accountable for it tomorrow, don’t post it today.

Semi-related: if a bunch of people I follow on Twitter and respect/respected decide tomorrow that maybe they should delete all their untimely and unfounded tweets and retweets about Ms. Palin and/or the Tea Party, I’ll understand WHY they do it….but still wonder why they didn’t just not bother in the first place until they had real information.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
I think that she should have removed it, but I also recognize that it’s a bad move because it gives pundits license to politicize it.

It was the responsible thing to do.

iris said:
So I guess that means your goddess palin putting targets on people is perfectly fine with you and i guess you still don’t think all those stupid libs are right by wanting to have more restrictions on who can have a gun and I guess you still think its perfectly fine to have people carrying guns at political rallys like you thought was sooo cool when the teabaggers did it before in AZ

uh…show me where I wrote that?

You don’t need stupid cows like Palin trying to inform anyone on any topic! No, not everyone in a single party is crazy, such as this one, but why throw out double meanings to the nut jobs,”hit list” “we will take every means possible ,even taking to our amendments rights” grow up! Why the double meanings? The nut jobs take the second meaning which is the intent! Use terms like “vote out” or” make the public aware”! You don’t need these billboards with guns on them! You mean take action ,not anything about gun rights. In two years NOTHING has reached the floor about gun control, grow up! This hate and false fear has to stop!

…also where did the map put on target ON HER PERSONALLY? There was a Republican appointed judge named John Roll who died during the shooting.

It is sickening how people, like you, are politicizing to try to capitalize on this sad incident….that is really LOW of you.

I’m waiting for all the Palin apologists to weigh in on this one.

James, Iris, and the other unethical and disrespectful leftwingers…

No comment on the KOS? Very telling.

How you so gleefully attempt to make the muder of these people (including a child) political, despite NO EVIDENCE, is simply inhuman!

You should be ashamed.

Latin2 said:
…also where did the map put on target ON HER PERSONALLY? There was a Republican appointed judge named John Roll who died during the shooting.

It is sickening how people, like you, are politicizing to try to capitalize on this sad incident….that is really LOW of you.

There is a target on her district and she NAMED Gifford. How more personal do you need?

I’m not sure what your point is in this post anymore, Mediaiate Staff.

However your post is misleading about how the website Daily Kos works – I read it frequently from 2004-2008 until the primaries got too poisonous, so I know. The Daily Kos editors do not scrub or delete diaries, generally. However, the AUTHOR of a diary can delete his/her own diary. That is what happened with this diary – the author himself commented on being horrified by the shooting elsewhere, and deleted his own diary.

>>The website Daily Kos has also deleted a diary about Rep. Gabrielle Giffords entitled “”My Congresswoman Voted Against Pelosi, Now She’s Dead To Me,”>>

I don’t know what anyone is trying to do as far as deleting content. You wrote it, you own it.

@ Iris

You are simply one of the worst, and most horrific people I have ever had the misfortune of reading.

You know no shame. You know no ethics.

You are a terrible terrible person.

George Sore-ohs said:
She should have had the brains to use a different symbol other than a bullseye. Another reason why she should cool her jets on running for the Presidential Office. She is unelectable.

Yeah, the Democrats should have had the brains to do that too before they started criticizing Sarah for doing the same thing they did. The whole notion is ridiculous. Metaphors don’t kill people, lunatics kill people.

ImNotBlue said:
@ Iris You are simply one of the worst, and most horrific people I have ever had the misfortune of reading. You know no shame. You know no ethics. You are a terrible terrible person.

Double that for Markos Moulitsas.

Interesting how there isn’t much snuffling around the trough here by the same old crowd on this one.
But I guarantee you that had the victim been a hardcore Congressional TeaPerson, this comment list would be pages long with every imaginable screed about this tragedy being proof of a ‘socialist takeover of AmeriKa’

nice to see a tiny bit of restraint & respect for a change

iris said:
Yeah and Palin will probably criticize him for his poor aim, She didn’t put a target on the judge

You are just as crazy and hate-filled as the extremists on the right. Thank God I’m a moderate!

Nacho said:
There is a target on her district and she NAMED Gifford. How more personal do you need?

So, this is all horrific and should be condemned, Nacho? No, it isn’t and you know it. You’re demagoguing murders and people fighting for their lives for political points because you’re a repulsive human being with stinky black goo where your heart should be and rocks in your head. Seek help.

@ DC

What happens when you click on the link to go to that page? Do you see the article?

That’s why its considered “deleted.”

iris said:
Heres another one who thinks its perfectly fine to put targets on people teven when one of them actually gets shot

Nowhere did I say that dude. Your post is a non-sequitur.

ImNotBlue said:
James, Iris, and the other unethical and disrespectful leftwingers… No comment on the KOS? Very telling. How you so gleefully attempt to make the muder of these people (including a child) political, despite NO EVIDENCE, is simply inhuman! You should be ashamed.

Come on, I agree there are left wing morons. But there are jerks on the other side too. Why does everyone have to politicize this tragedy?

Sorry, my liberal buddies, but this is extreme exaggeration. I hate it when the rightiwingers do it and I will not support you guys doing it. The bullseye imagery was not a call to assassinate those congress-people. That’s what you guys are arguing. It’s insane and indefensible. Be rational.

If you want to look at the true nature of a person, look to how they react during a tragedy.

On the tragedy in Arizona
By Sarah Palin · about an hour ago

My sincere condolences are offered to the family of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and the other victims of today’s tragic shooting in Arizona.

On behalf of Todd and my family, we all pray for the victims and their families, and for peace and justice.

- Sarah Palin

OR

“Fucking American Taliban”

Moulitsas also used the occasion of the tragedy to work in a Twitter plug for his book, “American Taliban.”

That says it all, doesn’t it?

iris said:
You can call me all the names you want it still doesn’t change the fact that the targeting of Giffords was politicized long before today……asshat

Your on the wrong side of this iris. Do us all a favor and stop embarrassing yourself further.

Gasket said:
Sorry, my liberal buddies, but this is extreme exaggeration. I hate it when the rightiwingers do it and I will not support you guys doing it. The bullseye imagery was not a call to assassinate those congress-people. That’s what you guys are arguing. It’s insane and indefensible. Be rational.

I never agree with you about anything. Today I do, wholeheartedly.

A girl who claims to be an ex-class mate of shooter says HE WAS A LEFT WINGER AND LIBERAL.

http://twitter.com/caitieparker

She said he was A RADICAL left winger and it turned out hat many Liberals were upset that Congresswoman Gifford WAS NOT A LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE Democrat, but a blue dog Democrat.

iris said:
Still sounds like you think its perfectly OK and GTK you know for sure what princesspalin thinks

I believe in freedom of speech. You are a liberal, you should to.

@ Enola

And I’ve said that numberous times today around this site. I even criticized Gordon (won’t the left be proud!).

BUT, there are a number of particularly hateful leftwinger (as I said) who have been ignoring information, while creating nonexistant evidence simply to attack those they disagree with. It’s shameful.

Talk to Iris… ask her about her gleeful trolling, celebrating the death of people, including a child. Ask her why it is that she’s ignored facts, and continued her political rants. Ask her why insulting Republicans/TeaPartiers/Palin comes first… and compassion, not at all.

Do that, then we’ll talk.

Latin2 said:
A girl who claims to be an ex-class mate of shooter says HE WAS A LEFT WINGER AND LIBERAL.

http://twitter.com/caitieparker

Latin2 said:

It is sickening how people, like you, are politicizing to try to capitalize on this sad incident….that is really LOW of you.

Follow your own advice!

Latin2 said:
She said he was A RADICAL left winger and it turned out hat many Liberals were upset that Congresswoman Gifford WAS NOT A LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE Democrat, but a blue dog Democrat.

He’s a nut. His politics are of the Crazy Party. The end. Stop.

Latin2 said:
…also where did the map put on target ON HER PERSONALLY?….

Right here:

http://twitpic.com/3o7glg

Gasket said:
Sorry, my liberal buddies, but this is extreme exaggeration. I hate it when the rightiwingers do it and I will not support you guys doing it. The bullseye imagery was not a call to assassinate those congress-people. That’s what you guys are arguing. It’s insane and indefensible. Be rational.

i believe that is the sanest post here
and the thing is, if palin does take the target thing down it will just affirm what everyone on the left said…that she was calling for someone to shoot the people on the list and it doesn’t matter who fired the shot.
she has to leave it up.

I don’t think at all Palin should be blamed for this, however if you have a child that is beaten every day of his youth with a stick, it is not a mystery when they use the same actions against their own childern or commit other crimes. All would agree, the parents should take some blame, even with the child being the one that did the crime! Palin didn’t beat the kid or even hand them the stick, but she let them know it might be OK to pick up the stick!

ImNotBlue said:
James, Iris, and the other unethical and disrespectful leftwingers…

No comment on the KOS? Very telling.

I wasn’t able to find a link to the KOS in this article. I never visit KOS so I had no idea what they were referring to. I have since seen the KOS graph on another page and I feel they are in the wrong also.

In today’s lunatic gun toting society, NO ONE should use those terms in political strategy rhetoric.

Hopefully a lesson of the sensitivity of it all will be recognized and that nonsense will be remove from our political discourse on all sides.

Gasket said:
Sorry, my liberal buddies, but this is extreme exaggeration. I hate it when the rightiwingers do it and I will not support you guys doing it. The bullseye imagery was not a call to assassinate those congress-people. That’s what you guys are arguing. It’s insane and indefensible. Be rational.

Is anybody really arguing that Sarah Palin put out a hit list?

I think the argument is there are whack job out there that don’t have a complete grasp on reality. When you are in the public spotlight and are boosted up on a soapbox, you have a responsibility to choose your words wisely and not use inflammatory words to light the fuse of a short fused bomb.

Did either the KOS or Palin cause this guy to target a congress person? Who knows. He did go after a political figure so to say he was just crazy is ignoring he had a motive.

Even if it had nothing to do with the messages they were throwing out there, this is a good time to address their rhetoric. Palin obviously feels something because she took her target down, that is a good sign. Maybe atleast she will be the bigger person and refrain from this bullshit in the future. I would applaud her for that. The KOS is completely foreign to me and I have no idea where they are coming from. Pressure should be put on them to tone it down if they encourage this behavior.

Listen up people! Words, pictures and actions DO matter! I lay this tragedy at the feet of the TEA PARTY and the REPUBLICAN PARTY, if they hadn’t been coming up with all the “SECOND AMENDMENT REMEDIES” and the targets on democrat districts, this tragedy likely would NOT have happened. Any one who thinks otherwise is delusional. http://politicsandotherirritants.blogspot.com/

If she removed it, people would think it looked suspicious; if she left it on, people would think it would be insensitive. She is first labeled as a complete moron to now a catalyst for a shooting. There is nothing this woman can do that does not apparently lead to the destruction of America. This is getting completely ridiculous now.

All we know is that the shooter was not a fan of Giffords. Can we please deal with facts please instead of making stuff up and perpetuating false claims?

Jackyboy says:

If she removed it, people would think it looked suspicious; if she left it on, people would think it would be insensitive. She is first labeled as a complete moron to now a catalyst for a shooting. There is nothing this woman can do that does not apparently lead to the destruction of America. This is getting completely ridiculous now.

All we know is that the shooter was not a fan of Giffords. Can we please deal with facts please instead of making stuff up and perpetuating false claims?

If she removed it, people would think it looked suspicious; if she left it on, people would think it would be insensitive. She is first labeled as a complete moron to now a catalyst for a shooting………….. Suspiciuos, insensitive, maybe that means it never should have been up anyway! Suspicious, insensitive, people might get the wrong idea “you think”! Perpetuating false claims…. “hit list, 2nd amendment in action, what a dumb ass! People are dead and you defend this stupid bitch! Those people’s lives are somewhat more important than hurting the low IQ queens feelings!

Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, speaking about Arizona:

“When you look at unbalanced people, how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths about tearing down the government­. The anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on in this country is getting to be outrageous­. And, unfortunat­ely, Arizona I think has become sort of the capital. We have become the Mecca for prejudice and bigotry.”

I think the good Sheriff would know more about the toll the vitriol in ALL OF THE SUDDEN extreme Right Wing (ie reactionary) states like Arizona than all the fake conservative apologists here.

Latin2 said:
Books:
I had favorite books: Animal Farm, Brave New World, The Wizard Of OZ, Aesop Fables, The Odyssey, Alice Adventures Into Wonderland, Fahrenheit 451, Peter Pan, To Kill A Mockingbird, We The Living, Phantom Toll Booth, One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, Pulp,Through The Looking Glass, The Communist Manifesto, Siddhartha, The Old Man And The Sea, Gulliver’s Travels, Mein Kampf, The Republic, and Meno.

In other words, what we have on our hands is a READER and thus an ELITIST and thus a LIBERAL. Of course.

Will one of you douchebags please spell Tucson correctly?

timcajun said:
Perpetuating false claims…. “hit list, 2nd amendment in action, what a dumb ass! People are dead and you defend this stupid bitch! Those people’s lives are somewhat more important than hurting the low IQ queens feelings!

People are dead and you’re attacking a politician you don’t like who had jack shit to do with those people being dead. Apparently, your hatred is more important than those lives. Get help.

Nacho said:
. Palin obviously feels something because she took her target down, that is a good sign.

Wrong. Read the fucking post.

Latin2 said:
If you look at the rest of his videos he was obviously crazy. I seriously doubt he saw Sarah Palin’s website or reads Daily Kos.

So… he just happened to feel like shooting people at this Safeway… and 2 of the victims just happened to be a congresswoman that Sarah Palin hated and a “liberal” judge. It’s all one big coincidence. I watched Loughner’s videos and I would say this guy is not a lot more sane than some of the Tea Party candidates we saw during the election last year. Most of his presentation is in fact Tea Party rhetoric– except for his views on religion. Coincidence?

What a weasel she is! Remember, she came out of the beauty contest world, and that could turn anyone into a weirdo. Remember the wink? It didn’t work for her, but she tried it, and it was pure beauty contest crap. You don’t rise in that world without practicing treachery, and treachery is one of the few things she’s good at — oh, yeah, and killing animals for sport.

To target a district does not mean to kill the candidate you oppose.

In fact, “target shooting” does not involve killing anything.

What next? Will the big-box store chain Target be forced to change its name and logo?

First let me state I am of the believe there is no question this guy was several bananas short of bunch. However I do believe there are many out there like him that are mentally very close to the edge. What frustrates me is the naivety of some of our elected leaders, political peronalities like Palin and the media that continuely use rhetortic that could easily be misinterrupted by those extremist on the right or left that can’t seperate their own disturbed thought process from reality. As an example here is a quote from Rush Limbaugh “If Obama Had Not Been African-American, He Would Never Have Been Elected”. In the mind of a extreme racist this just fans the flames of the hatred they have already built up against this President. In the mind of a person who cannot seperate reality from their own distrubed believes this might be the fuse that cause this person to go off. Go back through time of these people that act out their fansy. Lee Harvey Oswall, Sirhan Sirhan, James Earl Ray, John W Hickley, Timothy McVeigh all crazies that were politically driven. We need to talk and argue our points without these stupid violent analogies. Even Obama used the term enemy when referring to Republicans. I hope this act of violence is lesson that that we all can learn from and clean up our act. My prayer go out for these people and their families.

CRZ said:
Nothing should be removed. If you don’t want to be held accountable for it tomorrow, don’t post it today.

Semi-related: if a bunch of people I follow on Twitter and respect/respected decide tomorrow that maybe they should delete all their untimely and unfounded tweets and retweets about Ms. Palin and/or the Tea Party, I’ll understand WHY they do it….but still wonder why they didn’t just not bother in the first place until they had real information.

AMEN!!!

Why the hell should they remove “target-imagery”? You’d have to have the IQ of a moron, or that of Sen.Dick Durbin, not to understand that the imagery is based on voting…VOTING, people out of office.
When you have to explain the obvious to elected officials, you begin to understand why we’re in the trouble we are!!

There is no “targeted imagery ” DKOS article cited. And reading the article, it is targeting Democratic politicians for a primary. Nothing about crosshairs, reloading, or gun talk of any sort.

The deleted diary on DKOS was not deleted by the site; the person who wrote it (an anonymous person, I might add) has deleted it.

The Palin post is still on Facebook.

A little more fact checking from Mediate would be nice.

That being said, I sincerely doubt this dude would really Daily Kos to find out who to primary; nor do I believe he would read Palin’s Facebook page.

Sara Palin is someone who spews rhetorical nonsense because she does not have a clue. Her followers apparently don’t have a clue either to even consider her for the U.S. Presidency. And now this map, as you Sara Palin followers should know it’s intention is just what the speculation has been about. Ask columnist Andrea Rouda who referred to the map in hopes of someone “stopping” Keith Olberman.

Yes (devil) Sarin Palin is guilty of promoting the IDEA, her being an advocate for the NRA, the map was to serve the intent and purpose of just that. And the devils smartest trick he played on society was convincing the world he/she doesn’t exist, yet he/she hides behind elaborate deeds such as a hit map and call it something else. Then this demon nut case Jared Loughner who shot up a portion of Tucson simply and only needed to have GLANCED at the devil’s map. And not needed to be a follower of Palin, no more than he needed to follow her plan. Hell, least we forget that all the demons fall in order with the devil’s (masked) deeds.

CAconservative says:

Why the hell should they remove “target-imagery”? You’d have to have the IQ of a moron, or that of Sen.Dick Durbin, not to understand that the imagery is based on voting…VOTING, people out of office.
When you have to explain the obvious to elected officials, you begin to understand why we’re in the trouble we are!!

Based on voting, ok fine then just say that! Not reload, in our sights and all the amendment threats thrown out! The nut jobs are the ones that do these crimes. Don’t give them a double meaning to work with! Palin didn’t want harm to that women, but she can’t wait to pander to the NRA and throw out stupid one liners, that make no sense! Both parties have nut jobs that follow these rallies, so why throw gas on the fire?

Does Sarah realize that the internet isn’t like a time machine. Because a web site doesn’t exist anymore doesn’t mean it never did. Because she deletes a tweet doesn’t mean it was never tweeted. Tweets from a twit.

SARA PALIN SUPPORTERS, where are your Pom Poms. Allow me to share some blues clues with you:

1) Sara Palin is a supporter of the National Rifle Association

a) Supporters include animal killers for sports and clueless folks who will support an egg so long as it’s white.

2) Sara Palin gained notoriety because the GOP felt a “traditional” white woman would obtain Americas vote before a black male for president, thus helping the over his prime candidate John McCain of the Bush era. IT Back Fired. GO FIGURE.

3) For her own claim of unwittingly knowledge of politics and numerous unanswered questions to date, one wonders how “Anyone” can garner such attention, television show, daughter is considered a star with an out of wedlock child and became governor of a U.S. State with the population of the Arctic Circle..? GO FIGURE

4) THE MEDIA HAS GIVEN A WOMAN WITHOUT A CLUE THE HELM TO DISCUSS AND MOCK THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SYSTEM. HER MAP WAS A TOOL LOADED WITH SYMBOLS AND THE IDEOLOGY OF A NRA SUPPORTER OR SOMEONE THAT KILLS ANIMALS FOR SPORT.. BULLS EYE. NOW SOMEONE WITH AN IQ OF A TURNIP HAS ACTED UPON IT. REGARDLESS IF IT WAS DIRECTLY RELATED OR NOT.

People we need leaders in this country. The GOP and/or Bush Administration has torn the crust from the rim of this country and sent many jobs oversees. Preaching all along about Capitalism. WE DON’T NEED LEADERS WHO ARE CUT AND DUMB, WE NEED LEADERS WHO CAN DISTINGUISH THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND CANDY WRAPPER.

CAconservative says:

Why the hell should they remove “target-imagery”? You’d have to have the IQ of a moron, or that of Sen.Dick Durbin, not to understand that the imagery is based on voting…VOTING, people out of office.

bdpritch says:

It is those conservatives that stand behind the conservative politician by all means who are the deluded ones. It’s sad to know that the morals and values of right wing in this country has gone from serving the people to serving the corporations. And it’s even sadder for those conservative citizens who are NOT in the top ten percent rich to not have a clue that the agenda of conservative politicians are NOT for them.

iris said:
Yeah and Palin will probably criticize him for his poor aim, She didn’t put a target on the judge

virus, your illness holds no bounds. Get help, quick. Sick, sick sick…..

bdpritch said:
The GOP and/or Bush Administration has torn the crust from the rim of this country and sent many jobs oversees.

Facts, bd, facts. Remember a little thing called NAFTA? Didn’t think so.

JohnHeartfield said:
So… he just happened to feel like shooting people at this Safeway… and 2 of the victims just happened to be a congresswoman that Sarah Palin hated and a “liberal” judge. It’s all one big coincidence. I watched Loughner’s videos and I would say this guy is not a lot more sane than some of the Tea Party candidates we saw during the election last year. Most of his presentation is in fact Tea Party rhetoric– except for his views on religion. Coincidence?

What psycho blog did you dig this shit up? “It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.”

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/01/09/20110109john-roll-gabrielle-giffords-arizona-shooting.html
“He was a staunch Republican,” said Paul Charlton, former U.S. Attorney for Arizona, “very conservative, though he didn’t let it show.”

Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/01/09/20110109john-roll-gabrielle-giffords-arizona-shooting.html#ixzz1Aem0OXAS

Penguin60 says:

Facts, bd, facts. Remember a little thing called NAFTA? Didn’t think so.

bdpritchett says:

This site below under Negotiating and Ratification tells you who spearheaded NAFTA. George H.W. Bush. NAFTA and the US jobs going to India, Malaysia, China and back when, Taiwan and Korea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement

Do your research and you will see that such initiatives and support came from the far right. And one should wonder why the unemployment rate is so high. Below is a link of “Many” of the US jobs that have moved oversees. THIS IS VERY DISTURBING BECAUSE THESE COMPANY’S MADE PROFITS IN THE USA.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104×1144493

Now this site below shows are current president making attempts to convince the Capitalist to hire more Americans with the “trillions” of American earn cash reserved. Instead they are hiring oversees and not here!?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/atlantic/20101229/cm_atlantic/americancompaniesarehiringoverseas6375

It’s quite known that these corporations are not for the democratic people and especially liberals. So we know who they support (far right conservatives) and who supports them (lobbyists).

Are the progressives going to go after Target next? Images don’t kill people!

http://libertarians4freedom.blogspot.com/

A lot of hot air on the republican right trying to hard to avoid any responsibility.