Girl crush alert!!

If Megyn were a newbie journalist who hasn’t established herself as a serious journalist yet, I say it was a mistake, but she’s already a star.

Now bring on the liberals who hate a strong, SMART, sexy, woman!!

FOR REAL!
Her husband is a very lucky man!
Sexy and smart,, whew,, she should run for office!

@Atticus Draco
Sexy and smart,, whew,, she should run for office!

This is the real dumbing down of America, if that’s the requirement for a leadership role. What about truthfulness and integrity, a person of honor and character. Smartness by itself is not enough, someone could be shrewed yet evil to the core.

Hello Megyn !

She’s a knock-out; a true natural beauty!

skyfet said:
@Atticus Draco
Sexy and smart,, whew,, she should run for office!

This is the real dumbing down of America, if that’s the requirement for a leadership role. What about truthfulness and integrity, a person of honor and character. Smartness by itself is not enough, someone could be shrewed yet evil to the core.

I HAVE TRUST IN Megyn Kelly!!!
I LIKE HER!
I LIKE HER SPOT ON FOX NEWS AND O’Reilly
And she’s in possession of firm principles,, I have NO doubt of that!
Hell,, she’s so firm,, they are about to come out of her top up there!!

This probably takes a bit away from her credibility but it sure looks good.

How come the Lib women dont look this good. They are usually hideous or lesbians.

Atticus Draco said:
FOR REAL!
Her husband is a very lucky man!
Sexy and smart,, whew,, she should run for office!

Wonder how long that will last. Smart guys usually go for Sexy and Dumb. You cant beat it.

Lib women would need to shave their backs first.

Stunning.

Beauty, brains, and a fearlessness that makes her even more attractive. Don’t think for a second she didn’t know this would draw flak. Smokin’ hot.

Let the lefty sneers begin.

‘
You know,, NOT only is Megyn Kelly intelligent,, entrusting,, principled and most def sexy,, (even before this picture clearly demonstrates),, ,, BUT SHE’S ALSO CLASSY!
Wonderful personality
A very appealing and likable person!
You go gurl!

It’s NO WONDER FOX RULES!
Seriously,, it’s NOT

Atticus Draco said:
I HAVE TRUST IN Megyn Kelly!!!
I LIKE HER!
I LIKE HER SPOT ON FOX NEWS AND O’Reilly
And she’s in possession of firm principles,, I have NO doubt of that!
Hell,, she’s so firm,, they are about to come out of her top up there!!

…Karl?

I’m speechless. Wow!

Yeah, social conservatives who do “F*ck Me” centerfold spreads can lecture me about moral behavior any day of the week.

One is often told that it is a very wrong thing to attack religion, because religion makes men virtuous. So I am told; I have not noticed it.”
–LORD BERTRAND RUSSELL (1872-1970), British Nobel Laureate,mathematician, philosopher and peace activist,

Buttaface.

Fox News: Better that we sell Hate than Crack said:
 

Kind of like those leftist liberal pukes talking about tolerance.

Bill Mahwer said:
This probably takes a bit away from her credibility but it sure looks good.

How come the Lib women dont look this good. They are usually hideous or lesbians.

Uhm, false. Do the words “Hollywood Liberal” ring any bells? Also, if you think Megyn Kelly rolls out of bed looking like this, you’re crazy. It takes a whole army of stylists and makeup artists to make someone look like this. Plus, she has a horse face. All I want to do is feed her apples. Just saying.

Now Christiane Amanpour , Candy Crowley and Joy Behar would never behave this way !

“Now Christiane Amanpour , Candy Crowley and Joy Behar would never behave this way !”

Take heart, Eddie. There’s still Rachel Maddow.

Big Eddie said:
Now Christiane Amanpour , Candy Crowley and Joy Behar would never behave this way !

Thank God.

She has a masculine, overt jaw line and, while definitely attract, an Amazonian figure. Plus..you know…she’s 40…sooooo…….I’d do her. I’m not that picky.

Harry Flashman said:
There’s still Rachel Maddow

Antony Dupuy said:
I’d do her. I’m not that picky.

Sorry .

Being sexy, smart and credible are not mutually exclusive characteristics. I think it’s great that she’s confident enough to show that side of herself. If someone decides she’s no longer credible because she’s also pretty and sexy, their loss…probably just jealous and/or one of those who will denigrate anything/anyone Fox-related.

Agreed, Bunny.

When did conservative become synonymous with prude? She’s a smart and successful woman. She’s already got her own show, so she’s not using this to gain any ground. If anything, it’s a “screw you” to liberals who think they’ve got the market cornered on feminism as well as uptight conservatives who think they’ve got the market cornered on morality. Get over it.

Also, it is awesome.

I don’t care how hot she is, (and she sure is) I will never watch Fox News..!!

jbeast said:
When did conservative become synonymous with prude?

it didn’t, but remember those family values platform and O’Reillys remark of asking to get raped?

Harry Flashman said:
“Now Christiane Amanpour , Candy Crowley and Joy Behar would never behave this way !” Take heart, Eddie. There’s still Rachel Maddow.

I just threw up a little in my mouth.

jjay7381 said:
if you think Megyn Kelly rolls out of bed looking like this, you’re crazy.

What is your point?

Cindy Crawford once said that she does not look like “Cindy Crawford” when she gets up!

That’s a mistake. A real misstep on her part.

she’s great eyecandy…I’ve always thought that…I just prefer her muted because I find her way of journalism to be one sided…but, she’s a lawyer so that makes sense.

But, that’s me. let the passive-aggressive dissing of my comment being.

Megyn for President in 2012…!!!!!!!!!!!

MiddleRoader said:
it didn’t, but remember those family values platform and O’Reillys remark of asking to get raped?

Hmmm I wonder what Brll O will have to say about this. She is extremely attractive but I suppose there will be some of those PRUDE Repugs rhat are not going to be happy about this. Good for her.

BR said:
Lib women would need to shave their backs first.

There are lots of beautiful women in Hollywood and most of them are liberals.

WildMan said:
Megyn for President in 2012…!!!!!!!!!!!

So now we know what your priorties for president are.

Only TWO PICTURES???? I hope there’s more in the magazine!
Megyn Kelly is smart, articulate and drop dead gorgeous!!!!

Actually, how about MK for Press Sec in 2012, in likely next Repub Admin.

Now if only Alisyn Camerota and Courtney Friel would pose for somebody…maybe even together…I would be extremely grateful.

Man is she hot in this pic! She is also one of the smartest woman on TV! She doesn’t back down either. She has skills! Sarah and Megan in 2012 ???

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Girl crush alert!! If Megyn were a newbie journalist who hasn’t established herself as a serious journalist yet, I say it was a mistake, but she’s already a star. Now bring on the liberals who hate a strong, SMART, sexy, woman!!

Her attire and provocative pose, of course, plays quite well with we progressives. The group that traditionally objects to this kind of stuff are on the right, mostly the Christian right. I give Megyn credit. She is sexier than Anne Coulter, and those look real, but she is no Carrie Prejean.

skyfet said:
@Atticus DracoSexy and smart,, whew,, she should run for office! This is the real dumbing down of America, if that’s the requirement for a leadership role. What about truthfulness and integrity, a person of honor and character. Smartness by itself is not enough, someone could be shrewed yet evil to the core.

Kinda reminds me of all those young girls in 2008 who said they voted for Obama because he had “dreamy eyes”.

BlackWidow said:
So now we know what your priorties for president are.

This from the person who posted she would love to “pat down” Obama at the airport because she thinks he’s sexy.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/president-obama-tsa-pat-downs-an-inconvenience-for-all-of-us-except-him/

Richard Lombardo said:
I don’t care how hot she is, (and she sure is) I will never watch Fox News..!!

Sad…then you will never hear the truth about any issue. No wonder Liberals are so uninformed. But seriously, don’t you get tired of looking at ugly AND stupid women….c’mon give FOX a try.

lris said:
This from the person who posted she would love to “pat down” Obama at the airport because she thinks he’s sexy.

A disturbing thought , no ? I mean the thought of my Grandmother…….Ewwwwwwwww

Heard Maddow will be on the cover of Maxim’s swimsuit special.

LOL Okay, that hurt my brain.

ondrock said:
Sad…then you will never hear the truth about any issue. No wonder Liberals are so uninformed. But seriously, don’t you get tired of looking at ugly AND stupid women….c’mon give FOX a try.

Natasha Curry and Robin Meade are quite the pair of Hotties….and not on Fox.

You guys need to get laid…seriously! lol Oh I’m sorry Christian values…does that count for covet thy neighbor? I’m
just sayin..

Fact: Nice for small hands guy.

Fact: Real men like them hard hat size!

Fox Girls Gone Wild

All of Fox News bimbos should read the propaganda dressed just like that.

“How come the Lib women dont look this good. They are usually hideous or lesbians.”

Or, like Rachel Maddow, both hideous and lesbian. Megyn is smarter than Rachel and worked for Jones Day Reavis Pogue as a litigator. Jones Day is the premier litigation firm in the WORLD…!

MadCow got a PhD which counts for cowshit in any libturd university…! No law firm, PR firm or anything else besides a BS libturd university would hire her, and that as a ‘perfesser’ of LGBT studies, a truly hideous subject matter about truly hideous people. I’ll bet Wellesley or Barnard would give her a full perfessership! The line for consultation with perfesser MadCow would stretch down the corridor, I’ll bet….!

If she is so smart and such a great lawyer what is she doing working as a news person for FOX? That is not to smart.

Soooooooooo hot!

sean_m said:
Heard Maddow will be on the cover of Maxim’s swimsuit special.

LOL Okay, that hurt my brain.

You’re so classy.

Rachel Madcow on the cover of Maxum?????? No….more likely she will be doing a spead on Pravda or the local Mecca rag!!!! Black Widow must be an Oblah mo crat mouthpiece for Joe Biteme!!!

BlackWidow said:
If she is so smart and such a great lawyer what is she doing working as a news person for FOX? That is not to smart.

Yes, it is.

Man, can you imagine the swimsuit issue of the Socialist Worker???! Ehhhhw, yuck!

Ricky51 said:
Rachel Madcow on the cover of Maxum?????? No….more likely she will be doing a spead on Pravda or the local Mecca rag!!!! Black Widow must be an Oblah mo crat mouthpiece for Joe Biteme!!!

She’d be on Dog Fancy. (Sorry, I couldn’t resist.)

BlackWidow said:
So now we know what your priorties for president are.

Well first off, Megyn is a whole hell of a lot smarter than Obama. And she is damn sure more pleasant to look at while getting the news. Course FOX News has a bunch of very attractive and very smart/intelligent women on the payroll. And some are even Liberal/Democrat.

So yes if it were between Megyn Kelly and Hussein Obama in 2012, then damn straight Megyn gets my vote!

What’s with the “Come fuck me” look?

Isn’t she married?

No wonder she has already been divorced once..

Anyway, not gonna buy the mag. I masturbate to Christiane Amanpour.

She’s far more attractive in her news actress guise. Should have stuck with the feathered hair.

Frances writes this:

“Kelly appears wearing a severely low-cut dress and staring rather lasciviously into the camera. She’s not showing any more than the average starlet–”

And yet claims in her headline that Kelly “strips down”.

Really Frances? Not only do you suffer from PDS, but FDS as well.

You need to get a grip girl and woman up. You shouldn’t show your jealousy so much….you are afraid of Sarah because she is dynamic and beautiful, you appear to be afraid of Kelly for the same reasons.

TfT said:
Frances writes this:

“Kelly appears wearing a severely low-cut dress and staring rather lasciviously into the camera. She’s not showing any more than the average starlet–”

And yet claims in her headline that Kelly “strips down”.

Really Frances? Not only do you suffer from PDS, but FDS as well.

You need to get a grip girl and woman up. You shouldn’t show your jealousy so much….you are afraid of Sarah because she is dynamic and beautiful, you appear to be afraid of Kelly for the same reasons.

This may come as a surprise to you, but not everyone acts like insecure teenage girls (such the conservative no-lifers that troll this site).

Seems like most people are missing the forest for the trees here (and no puns about bushes!):

Her comments about Beck are probably not going to sit well with Beck AND Fox. She’s basically saying there’s some truth to him spreading disinformation, and one can only assume that’s probably not going to go over well at HQ.

Big_F-ing_Deal said:
What’s with the “Come fuck me” look? Isn’t she married? No wonder she has already been divorced once.. Anyway, not gonna buy the mag. I masturbate to Christiane Amanpour.

You’re a typical liberal woman.

I look forward to the day when she strips off the title of serious journalist since she has never earned it. Go into acting, modeling,commentating. Whatever. But she is no journalist.

TfT You shouldn’t show your jealousy so much….you are afraid of Sarah because she is dynamic and beautiful, you appear to be afraid of Kelly for the same reasons.

Said the ugly right-wing shut-in troll. Just a guess, but I’m pretty certain you are NO treat too look at. TfT (Troll Fat Troll) is sitting in her windowless basement waiting for her 80 year old mother to bring her another bottle of Gordon’s vodka that she demanded a couple of hours ago. TfT screeches “Momma, where’s my God damned vodka! I’m beginning to sober up here!”. TfT needs it to fuel her bitten-down fingers to bang out more crap on websites like this… a real-life troll. Both in appearance and action.

She’s looks fantastic, especially at 40, and her works speaks for itself. She’s both smart, engaging, and gorgeous. Good for her!

Your article headline is ridiculous, and your thought of her being a ‘victim’ is equally silly. Woman don’t fall into the trap of worrying about being ‘too pretty’ to be taken seriously. You just do your job well, and the rest works itself out. Yes, losers will judge her, who cares about the idiots..

AngelPeters said:
I look forward to the day when she strips off the title of serious journalist since she has never earned it. Go into acting, modeling,commentating. Whatever. But she is no journalist.

Who is a journalist these days? I don’t think many of the past journalist who had household names were actually journalists, either.

Also, journalism only works when the journalists and readers have the same belief system. I don’t think it is possible for a journalist who is one on side to ever be “objective” to what the reader who is on the other side perceives.

We have to face the fact that liberals have a different belief system as compared to more conservative/traditional people.

Conservative/traditional people generally measure success as when things are better or can get better. From my research, the Modern Liberals/Progressives don’t work like this. They measure success as when things are “equal”. It’s a huge difference.

This is why the two sides can’t agree on much. So no matter how careful a journalist tries to be faithful to his/her belief system, the other side won’t buy it. We can’t agree on the problems so how can we agree on the solutions!

This is another strange article by Mediaite

More Liberty said:
Mediaite

Mediaite seems to be a “provocateur”. They just pick out pieces of things that are designed to rile people up and put them out there for comment

I don’t watch her show, so I don’t know much about her politics, but she is pretty hot.

What I find amusing is the way the regular Conservatives here, who spend so much of their time and effort saying what a biased, in fact practically evil, and unfair place Mediaite is to their side of the aisle seem to not notice that this is the very thing they say never happens; a fair piece on a conservative figure.

Confirmation bias much?

That, and the way in which the point of the article, i.e. women are objectified in ways men aren’t, is supported by the very sorts of, “ooh.. I’d do that,” and, ‘Those nasty Libs aren’t sexy at all, so… (insert irrelevant extrapolation here)”.

Motes and beams people.

BlackWidow said:
If she is so smart and such a great lawyer what is she doing working as a news person for FOX? That is not to smart.

That is the dumbest thing I’ve read in w while…Yeah, Why would anyone want to be a morning anchor on the #1 rated news network in the country. I know you would choose PMSNBC…which no one watches.

You people are all pathetic. Just because she has blonde hair and shows her tits she’s hot….whatever the hell that means……yea she’s really smart…OMG…what kind of idiots do we have in this country?….A serious journalist would NEVER POSE IN SUCH A WAY ANYWHERE…..How in the world could you ever take her seriously? Man….we’re really in trouble if we consider her a journalist!!!!!!!!! She does nothing for women except to help men objectify them…woman will never rise above their status in this country as long as we have women like her in the public eye. SHAME ON HER….SHAME ON HER….SHAME ON HER…..This is about as low as media can go…..in the future she will lead this country to muslim laws….we’ll have to wear birka’s…maybe muslims know something us westerns don’t ….and that is how low we can go as a human race….all you need to do is watch reality shows on TV….and man we’re in deep dodo…

Poor Megyn is the typical insecure woman who thinks she has to take off her clothes and put on some sexy underwear and pose for a men’s magazine. For ratings? Because she might be going through a mid-life crisis? She is an entertaining anchor on Fox News but she is NOT a Journalist. Put your clothes back on, Meg, and do the frickin’ news. Only the old horn-dog men care about what you look like undressed.

She’s got a rather horsey-looking face, doesn’t she?

Trust conservatives to hire any female for their alleged good looks; bright, decent, and well-rounded women really seem to SCARE them. :)

“FOR REAL!
Her husband is a very lucky man!
Sexy and smart,, whew,, she should run for office!”

I thought you right-wingers only thought women were good for one thing. Oh, and cleaning.

“Bill Mahwer said:
This probably takes a bit away from her credibility but it sure looks good.

How come the Lib women dont look this good. They are usually hideous or lesbians.”

I wonder if you dittoheads look in the mirror often, there must be a reason why you are ALWAYS so hateful towards women. Look like Rush Limbaugh, do we?
Well, at least liberal men aren’t the ones beating up women who don’t agree with them, calling them feminazis, bitches, cunts, etc. WHY do you guys think YOUR women are nothing?

Yes, you conservative males really know how to treat women properly. (that’s major sarcasm, honey)

Notice all the comments from the right-wing male crowd? You guys honestly believe you give a fuck about women?

Your mothers obviously didn’t care about you guys enough to make you even respect women. :) Oh, those nasty liberals are SOOOOOO offended by your words. Get real, boys.

Conservative men like their “bitches” dumb and pliable. They don’t like strong, capable women; also, studies show most wife-beaters are conservative males.

Yes, continue the sink to the bottom, guys, it’s kind of funny.

Biscuit said:
Conservative men like their “bitches” dumb and pliable. They don’t like strong, capable women; also, studies show most wife-beaters are conservative males.

Yes, continue the sink to the bottom, guys, it’s kind of funny.

I can’t speak for any conservative males, but us Libertarians like our woman intelligent, strong, and sexy… I think Megan falls into that category….

I think a lot of her appeal is because she is so intelligent and talented.

Biscuit said:
Conservative men like their “bitches” dumb and pliable. They don’t like strong, capable women; also, studies show most wife-beaters are conservative males. Yes, continue the sink to the bottom, guys, it’s kind of funny.

You’re about a sicko.

Click on the ‘Fullscreen’ button and then scroll down. Loks like she’s about to float an air biscuit.

Biscuit said:
“Bill Mahwer said:This probably takes a bit away from her credibility but it sure looks good. How come the Lib women dont look this good. They are usually hideous or lesbians.” I wonder if you dittoheads look in the mirror often, there must be a reason why you are ALWAYS so hateful towards women. Look like Rush Limbaugh, do we?Well, at least liberal men aren’t the ones beating up women who don’t agree with them, calling them feminazis, bitches, cunts, etc. WHY do you guys think YOUR women are nothing? Yes, you conservative males really know how to treat women properly. (that’s major sarcasm, honey)

Come on, B. Conservative politicians don’t abuse women. They’re too busy soliciting airport shit house blow jobs.

“How come the Lib women dont look this good. They are usually hideous or lesbians.”

“Lib women would need to shave their backs first.”

“Or, like Rachel Maddow, both hideous and lesbian.”

Somebody must’ve done some REAL hog-calling to bring out you pigs.

Kelly is a good-looking woman – but if she wanted to be regarded as a serious journalist, she should’ve kept her pants on.

“Megyn is smarter than Rachel and worked for Jones Day Reavis Pogue as a litigator. Jones Day is the premier litigation firm in the WORLD…!”

I’M IMPRESSED…!

“MadCow got a PhD which counts for cowshit in any libturd university…!”

Maddow is a PhD, Oxford – and a Rhodes scholar, to boot. All your cowshit-shoveling won’t bury the reputation of one of the oldest and most-revered educational institutions in Meddy Olde England – or one of its most notable graduates. Even YOU can’t drag it/them down to your level.

Taking swipes at other colleges that have nothing to do with the matter simply adds to the sad desperation of your feeble diatribe ( . . . !).

Some_Dude said:
This may come as a surprise to you, but not everyone acts like insecure teenage girls (such the conservative no-lifers that troll this site).

Today’s “Ka-ZINNNG!” award goes to SD. I suspect a LOT of things come as surprises to the often-klueless konservative klass here.

Alzheimer: “Who is a journalist these days? I don’t think many of the past journalist who had household names were actually journalists, either.”

Rather than smear the entire profession, name someone. That cheep hack Walter Cronkite? Edward R. Murrow? Huntley and/or Brinkley? Even YOU can’t drag them down to Fakes “News’” level.

“Also, journalism only works when the journalists and readers have the same belief system. I don’t think it is possible for a journalist who is one on side to ever be “objective” to what the reader who is on the other side perceives.”

My “belief system” is truth, facts and evidence. What’s yours?

“We have to face the fact that liberals have a different belief system as compared to more conservative/traditional people.”

Yeah, libs can accept unpleasant truths, facts and evidence and try to deal with them.

“Conservative/traditional people generally measure success as when things are better or can get better.”

Cons con each other into believing things will be just swell if we simply dismantle our own government and let the corporations take over – which they are currently in the process of doing.

Who says conservatives are any more “traditional” than liberals? Many of the founding fathers were avowedly liberal. “I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations of justice and liberality.” – George Washington.

“From my research, the Modern Liberals/Progressives don’t work like this. They measure success as when things are “equal”. It’s a huge difference.”

Your research – to the extent that you actually did any – is flawed. It was probably done through right-wing sources that have no interest in “fairness and balance.”

The “huge difference” is that libs/progressives believe in equal TREATMENT and OPPORTUNITIES while cons prefer the “I got mine – screw you” approach. It’s great if you happen to be in the I-got-mine club. Otherwise, not so great.

George Bush was born on third base and thought he’d hit a triple. He got his. Screw you.

Granted, many other people have had the ingenuity, intelligence or just plain good luck to become successful. That doesn’t negate their obligation to society or the country. Many were the product of government-supported public schools and colleges or received government grants. Henry Ford declared bankruptcy SEVEN TIMES (thorugh government courts) before finding success.

I don’t begrudge anyone his or her success, but I DO expect them to pay their fair share to support the system and infrastructure that almost invariably helped them.

“no matter how careful a journalist tries to be faithful to his/her belief system, the other side won’t buy it.”

If his/her “belief system” is the crumbling pastiche of lies, distortions and mischaracterizations that constitute Fakes “News” and much of the corporate/right-wing media, it’s no wonder the “other side” won’t buy it. It’s damaged goods.

“We can’t agree on the problems so how can we agree on the solutions!”

Problem: Propaganda masquerading as “news.”

Solution: Tell us the truth. Give us the facts – even if it hurts. Leave the spin to the spinmeisters and label it as such. When Fox’s adulterated “journalism” began being accepted as “news” and news itself became a profit center – at the expense of unbiased reportage – the entire business of journalism suffered. The prognosis ain’t good.

MSNBC offers both news and opinion, and more clearly delineates the two than Fox does. They do not distort facts. Errors of fact are usually quickly corrected. They may not be perfect, but they appear to make a more genuine effort to present themselves more honestly and forthrightly than just about anyone on the right.

Lefty radio talkers like Thom Hartmann (.com) and Randi Rhodes (.com) present their sources on-air and on their websites. Rhodes assigns “homework” to her listeners, telling them repeatedly not to just take her word. Stephanie Miller (.com) is more overtly liberal, but makes no attempt to portray herself as impartial.

Alz said:
Mediaite seems to be a “provocateur”. They just pick out pieces of things that are designed to rile people up and put them out there for comment

So do Drudge, Hannity, Beck, Limbaugh. Mediaite is hardly unique in this regard, though they don’t maul the facts nearly as much as the aforementioned “ambulance-chasers.”

Cons appear content to have their right-wing media twist the truth into an unrecognizable heap, but sites like this one are labeled lefty/commie/socialist the moment there’s even a hint of liberal content – real or perceived.

In today’s vapid media, a girls got to do what a girls got to do, even if she’s 40. Sorry to say, but I just lost a bit of respect for her, she looks like every female sports reporter who’s trying to make a name for herself with her outfit. To bad

That’s what Faux News is good for. Turn the sound down, look at the sexy women and jerk off.

I’ll admit that Faux has incredibly sexy and attractive women. I just don’t want to hear them talk and make themselves ugly.

ChickaBOOMer: Broadcast Nudes
http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2010/11/broadcast-nudes.html

Baby Factories come and Baby Factories go away, many guys work the Baby Factories for years. God made these Baby Factories very pretty to trick the guys into multiplying and filling the earth. It works very well, that is why the earth is overpopulated. All of us pay dearly for Baby Factory products. It is a never ending up and down game. Some day the curtain will fall and the show will be over, until then, we capitalist will capitalize on every aspect of this profitable business. We will wring every last drop of fun and gold out of it before the curtain falls.

“I’ll admit that Faux has incredibly sexy and attractive women. I just don’t want to hear them talk and make themselves ugly.”

—You progressives are so confusing, half the time you bitch about people being “fat and ugly” yet when they’re pretty you don’t want to hear them talk. Make up your mind!

bealzebubba said:
Natasha Curry and Robin Meade are quite the pair of Hotties….and not on Fox.

Wow….I get thumbs down for stating the obvious? Seriously?

I just keep loosing faith in the male gender of America.

“There’s the First Amendment, and then there’s spreading obvious misinformation”. Wait, isn’t that the accusation we use against the Fox News Channel as a whole? That they’re a propaganda factory that lies continually?

“You progressives are so confusing, half the time you bitch about people being “fat and ugly . . . ”

I seldom see such sentiments expressed by libs here. They may point out the hypocrisy of a Rush Limbaugh criticizing Nancy Pelosi’s looks (e.g., “he’s one to talk”) but they don’t seem to go out of their way to demean HIS looks unless he asks for it.

I’m more concerned about the fat between his EARS than what’s around his waist.

jrcmi said:
Cons appear content to have their right-wing media twist the truth into an unrecognizable heap, but sites like this one are labeled lefty/commie/socialist the moment there’s even a hint of liberal content – real or perceived.

The first part is wrong and the second part is correct.

Both sides are always sniffing to see if the other’s biases are involved in any discourse. The difference is liberalism is based on forcing everything to be “equal” and conservatism is based on ensuring the conditions are good for making things better.

You can whine all you want about the Right, but the right is about making things better. The Left sucks because “equal” means tearing down success. In short, the Right is in fact better for people.

It’s interesting that you agree with my statement that sites like Mediaite “are labeled lefty/commie/socialist the moment there’s even a hint of liberal content – real or perceived.” You thus admit that even the mere PERCEPTION of liberal content is sufficient proof for you. I hope you dodge jury duty – for the sake of the innocent, that is.

“Both sides are always sniffing to see if the other’s biases are involved in any discourse.”

“Sniffing”? What’s your favorite brand of glue? True discourse involves a fair hearing of all sides of an issue. Corporate-owned conservative media is far more likely to ignore, distort or mischaracterize the liberal perspective, thus distorting the discourse in their favor.

For instance, I heard about a Fakes “News” radio report about a vote in Congress last week to extend unemployment benefits. The reporter said only that House Dems “failed to pass” the extension. The report concealed the true reason for the failure; House Republicans’ nearly unanimous “nay” votes.

This report deliberately misled listeners into believing that the Dems killed the bill, which was absolutely false – and one of those many mischaracterizations I’ve pointed out. If you and your con pals get your way, Fox and the rest of the corporate-owned conservative media will be emboldened to lie even more brazenly – to me . . . and to YOU.

“The difference is liberalism is based on forcing everything to be “equal” and conservatism is based on ensuring the conditions are good for making things better.”

Define “equal.” Define “better.” For that matter, define “force.” Like so many cons, you’re quick to complain – and judge – but slow-w-w to explain.

You apparently don’t believe in civil rights – since they were “forced” on us – so business owners should be allowed to chase away blacks with baseball bats like they did in the “good old days.” Women should stay in the kitchen with the kids and out of the voting booth, since suffrage was “forced” on us. And so on.

Progressives would like to “force” net neutrality, ensuring a free flow of opinion and information. Cons want to give complete and unfettered control of the ‘net to powerful, self-interested media conglomerates. If that happens, you may not hear any “whining” from me or anyone else again. While you may consider that no great loss, there would also be no guarantee we’ll ever hear YOUR whining again.

If you think that’s far-fetched, you’d better think some more. Similar things have occurred during right-wing regimes elsewhere in the world.

“The Left sucks because “equal” means tearing down success. In short, the Right is in fact better for people.”

Ah, even MORE in-depth analysis.

Progressives “tore down” successful labor abuse. You can thank them for your 40-hour work week, overtime pay, child-labor laws and workplace safety rules that keep your head attached to the rest of you. They “tore down” barriers to free speech, civil rights, universal suffrage and many other day-to-day freedoms you take for granted.

People fought and died for your rights. A lot of them were liberals.

Your vaunted right-wing “research” sources are ill-informed. They have done you no favor.

jrcmi said:
It’s interesting that you agree with my statement that sites like Mediaite “are labeled lefty/commie/socialist the moment there’s even a hint of liberal content – real or perceived.” You thus admit that even the mere PERCEPTION of liberal content is sufficient proof for you. I hope you dodge jury duty – for the sake of the innocent, that is.

“Both sides are always sniffing to see if the other’s biases are involved in any discourse.”

“Sniffing”? What’s your favorite brand of glue? True discourse involves a fair hearing of all sides of an issue. Corporate-owned conservative media is far more likely to ignore, distort or mischaracterize the liberal perspective, thus distorting the discourse in their favor.

For instance, I heard about a Fakes “News” radio report about a vote in Congress last week to extend unemployment benefits. The reporter said only that House Dems “failed to pass” the extension. The report concealed the true reason for the failure; House Republicans’ nearly unanimous “nay” votes.

This report deliberately misled listeners into believing that the Dems killed the bill, which was absolutely false – and one of those many mischaracterizations I’ve pointed out. If you and your con pals get your way, Fox and the rest of the corporate-owned conservative media will be emboldened to lie even more brazenly – to me . . . and to YOU.

“The difference is liberalism is based on forcing everything to be “equal” and conservatism is based on ensuring the conditions are good for making things better.”

Define “equal.” Define “better.” For that matter, define “force.” Like so many cons, you’re quick to complain – and judge – but slow-w-w to explain.

You apparently don’t believe in civil rights – since they were “forced” on us – so business owners should be allowed to chase away blacks with baseball bats like they did in the “good old days.” Women should stay in the kitchen with the kids and out of the voting booth, since suffrage was “forced” on us. And so on.

Progressives would like to “force” net neutrality, ensuring a free flow of opinion and information. Cons want to give complete and unfettered control of the ‘net to powerful, self-interested media conglomerates. If that happens, you may not hear any “whining” from me or anyone else again. While you may consider that no great loss, there would also be no guarantee we’ll ever hear YOUR whining again.

If you think that’s far-fetched, you’d better think some more. Similar things have occurred during right-wing regimes elsewhere in the world.

“The Left sucks because “equal” means tearing down success. In short, the Right is in fact better for people.”

Ah, even MORE in-depth analysis.

Progressives “tore down” successful labor abuse. You can thank them for your 40-hour work week, overtime pay, child-labor laws and workplace safety rules that keep your head attached to the rest of you. They “tore down” barriers to free speech, civil rights, universal suffrage and many other day-to-day freedoms you take for granted.

People fought and died for your rights. A lot of them were liberals.

Your vaunted right-wing “research” sources are ill-informed. They have done you no favor.

You’re funny. You describe looking at both sides and then you start calling Fox names.

The reality is the two sides can never really have a civil discourse because their belief systems are different. One side wants to control everything and make everything “equal” as a way towards a Utopia and the other side (conservatives) work towards trying to limit government control and to empower the individual – all based on a moral foundation.

I call our system “Democratic Capitalism Based On A Moral Foundation.” Deep down liberals hate every part of that description.

BTW, you forget to tell us to thank the the left for weekends!

Still can’t hold a candle to Julie banderas

megyan is a butter-face

“True discourse involves a fair hearing of all sides of an issue. Corporate-owned conservative media is far more likely to ignore, distort or mischaracterize the liberal perspective, thus distorting the discourse in their favor.”

shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh,.,.,……loose lips sink ships……damn

*cough*
If I may kind sir……representative Akin can testify to the fox news pursuit of truth and reason…, that which encompasses the definitive criteria of fair and balanced journalism.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385×528715

I am sure she is smart and clearly has good looks on her side but a “journalist”?

Um, no. She reads the news. Nothing more and the fact that she is part of the Australian and Saudi run right wing ministry of propaganda doesn’t help validate her integrity.

This stunt is merely a way for her to whore herself a bit more which is, I suppose, part of the television business.

“I seldom see such sentiments expressed by libs here. They may point out the hypocrisy of a Rush Limbaugh criticizing Nancy Pelosi’s looks (e.g., “he’s one to talk”) but they don’t seem to go out of their way to demean HIS looks unless he asks for it.”

—Do you think only so-called “beautiful people” have the right to judge beauty? That’s like saying only professional filmmakers have the right to be movie critics. Rush Limbaugh already endures plenty of criticism for his looks, I don’t blame him if he wants to throw some of that back. Besides, he’s a lot less hateful than most of the people he criticizes.

http://politicallyincorrectlibertarian.wordpress.com/2010/11/23/the-dream-act-insults-legal-immigrants/

“This may come as a surprise to you, but not everyone acts like insecure teenage girls (such the conservative no-lifers that troll this site).”

Wow, an imbecile with a Che avatar calls conservatives “trolls” while the comment fingers on his posts are 10-1 red and down. That’s a libturd for you, dumber than dirt, but utterly oblivous to that fact.

And Black Widow shows her dumbness by saying being on Fox isn’t better than being one of five hundred litigation lawyers. Oops…forgot that Demoncrats are the party of shyster sheenie ambulance-chasing legal beagles.

And there isn’t ONE Hollywood star who is good-looking and as SMART as Megyn, including the egregious dummie Scarlett Johannsson, another media confection without a brain.

Don’t worry – the dysfunctional left will counter with Nude pics of Joyless BayWhore!!

Oh Boy, Megyn, Megyn, Megyn, why did you do it? How much did you get paid to totally “ruin” your image. You are lovely and smart, there is no doubt about that but look, you work for Fox..have you not thought of what such an act can do to a station with such high ratings..you don’t want to use your sexuality to gain popularity..you have it all, I am so disappointed in you, I truly enjoyed watching you, this is demeaning..not only that, as pretty as you are, you appear “cheap looking” in that photo, first of all, we know you have good legs but..the heels..what size shoe do you wear, they are colossal and red?..WoW, this is something that belongs to that cheapie show “Dancing with the stars”. You look awkward in the photo, of course men will find it delightful, they will drool over a Grandma if she has a suggestive pose…very poor taste..the photographer did not do you justice..he made you look like a hooker..shame on you..you’re making zillions at Fox, why would you do such a thing? You made a serious boo boo Megyn. I was stunning at your age but nobody could have paid me enough to pose like that, tsk, tsk.tsk……

ok, ok, the pose where you’re half sitting on the chair (in an effort to get a good side view of your legs of course) looks like an ad for “hemorrhoid cream” or better yet, “Boy, I can’t wait until this shoot is over, I have to go….real bad”…you look silly Megyn…why, why, why do you people have to get greedy..I’m doing something else when your show comes on, please do me a favor, don’t start dressing like a hooker when you’re reporting important news, you cheapen the profession…WHO talked you into this? I know it wasn’t Bill O’Reilly , he’s too smart and level headed to applaud such an action, although he has used a little bit of botox…but that’s ok, we don’t need the left commenting on his age. i.e. Lamont the PROFESSOR, ahem, who hates fat people, especially those who might be PRESIDENT!! I just want to erase this photo of you from my memory bank, it’s….sad!!!

I would drink her bath water…then pleasure her till she screams YES OBAMA, YESSSSSSSSSSSS!!!

“You’re funny. You describe looking at both sides and then you start calling Fox names.”

Wrong. I told you what they DO.

“BTW, you forget to tell us to thank the the left for weekends!:

You wouldn’t be making cheezy jokes about workers’ rights if you didn’t HAVE any.

David Mangan said:
“How come the Lib women dont look this good. They are usually hideous or lesbians.”

Or, like Rachel Maddow, both hideous and lesbian. Megyn is smarter than Rachel and worked for Jones Day Reavis Pogue as a litigator. Jones Day is the premier litigation firm in the WORLD…!

MadCow got a PhD which counts for cowshit in any libturd university…! No law firm, PR firm or anything else besides a BS libturd university would hire her, and that as a ‘perfesser’ of LGBT studies, a truly hideous subject matter about truly hideous people. I’ll bet Wellesley or Barnard would give her a full perfessership! The line for consultation with perfesser MadCow would stretch down the corridor, I’ll bet….!

You are probably unhinged with the bigotry and hatred you spew. You do realize M/s Maddow graduated from Stanford and is a Rhodes scholar. You do know that right? She has a doctorate and got it 7-8 years ago. If Kelly got into an intellectual political debate with Maddow she would get her clock cleaned. I like megyn but saying that she’s the smartest woman on TV is laughable.

I think its awesome that my 14 year old son can masturbate to Fox News. This photo shoot definitely ups her masturbation fodder status to having a more sophisticated group of men ejaculating on the TV while she covers the hard news for Fox. Way to go girl! You keep climbing that ladder and before you know it, you will have yourself a real live Playboy spread and then baby, even people who have never heard of you will be ejaculating to your visage which of course, is what we women all really want. It is the only actual sign of having “made it”. Thanks for reminding smart capable women that no matter how sucessful we become, all we are really good for is cumm’n on. My hero!!

Usually when I’ve seen folks tilt like that they have been passing gas, which is possilble seeing how much GAS gets passed on Ms. Kelly’s show.

I would rather look at Rachel Maddow nude than watch Megyn Kelly…..who am I kidding, no I wouldn’t. Now I’m going to go wash my eyes out with soap.

Why is it that the Left feel so obligated to tie smarts to degrees. There is nothing more pitifull than a well educated moron and believe me there are millions of them. I dont know how smart Maddow is or thinks she is and dont care, its what she does with what she learned and so far, not much. I dont care if she is Lesbian, hell I like women too, but I do care if she is honest in what she presents as news, and since I dont watch/listen, cant say. I do know what Kelly says and even tho she is very nice looking, she does her job well, she reports what is there to report. Unlike many Liberal So called reporters, she does not try to manufacture the news, she just reports it. She asks questions and knows when she is being BS’d and says so. Yes she is blessed with good looks AND smart too. That just kills a Lib.

OMG! If only we could get Michell to pose?…just kidding…back off!

…or both, and less intelligent…

…or both, and less intelligent…

“Now bring on the liberals who hate a strong, SMART, sexy, woman!!”
Your “challenge” is irrelevant. 

The picture of Megyn Kelly isn’t Megyn Kelly – it’s a picture. It isn’t representative of Megyn Kelly the person – it’s a representation of what a professional photographer trained & experienced in making – MAKING, not taking – pictures of celebrities that the GQ readership wants & expects.  

If she’d chosen to submit to a picture made for readers of PLAYBOY, or of READER’S DIGEST, or of HUSTLER, or of PEOPLE, the desires & expectations of the readers, obviously quite different, would have been pursued, & indeed the same photographer (absent principled objections) could make just as satisfactory a picture for each.

The point is, these aren’t real people to readers – they’re pictures of people who readers will never know as real people anyway. A photographer who knows her or his craft can take just about any person & make a picture of that person – not “that person”, just a PICTURE of that person – look just about any way he or she wants. 

This applies just as much to the appearances the person named Megyn Kelly makes on the shows on which she appears on Fuppet News. The way she appears is more a reflection of what Roger Ailes wants presented than anything real to do with Megyn Kelly the person. Your characterization of Megyn Kelly the Fuppet has almost nothing to do with whether Megyn Kelly the actual person has any of these attributes you project on that Fuppet (strong – “SMART” – sexy – even woman is an assumption … & if you think I’m exaggerating, if so it’s simply a function of the times, because there are hundreds to thousands of historical examples of persons presenting as being of genders they actually are not of). 

But leave aside “woman”: just consider the other 3. 

A person of any breadth of experience in matters of sex comes to know that there simply is no co-relation between appearance & sex drive – nor between public appearance & personal attractiveness. 

Consider also that almost every representation you see on TV, not just on Fuppet News but to some extent or another on every channel, is aimed at appearing more cartoonish than real life can possibly sustain. That Megyn Kelly character to whom you ascribe ‘strength’ is only so by presentational choice; it’s no more authentic or reliable than Alan Colmes in his Fuppet ‘liberal’ role is weak.   Since they’re both simply representations, you cannot trust that it’s Colmes who might well be the stronger person in real life than Kelly is; you just don’t know, & it’s very likely that you will NEVER know.

As to “SMART”, bear in mind that Fuppet News productions are highly orchestrated Kabuki theater, & STILL Megyn Kelly appeared on Bill O’Reilly’s show and said of pepper spray “It’s a food product, essentially”. That was hardly “smart” by any measure. 

Millions of male American teens had copies of that iconic photo made of Farrah Fawcett up on their bedroom walls, but anyone who knows the travails of the actual life the actual person Farrah Fawcett lived recognizes that wasn’t Farrah Fawcett up there – that was a picture.

“a true natural beauty”.

Sure – that’s what that picture shows. Sure it does.

“I’m not that picky”.  
Obviously not. I do hope you & she & your hand are happy together.

You really need to take a precis writing course

There are already many sexy pictures of Courtney Friel out there.  Very nice

I have to agree, she is smart and sexy.  Too bad she is paid to lie like most of the others at Fox News.  I just wonder what the other women at Fox thinks about this and how will they react.  Megyn is probably the highest paid woman on Fox News, so the other girls now know what they have to do to get the big bucks.

Personally I think some of the women on MSNBC and CNN should show a little more skin like the girls on Fox. 

BTW have anyone seen all of the upskirt shots on the Fox News anchors on youtube.  It’s no wonder their ratings are high.

So it’s not just Fox news that hires airhead blondes- republican law firms do too- but we knew that.

Dumb and sexy- like rednecks like them.

who’s the dumb ass now.are you really that stupid

i agree.shes pretty fake with the news too

looks fantastic after 4 eeh 5 beers

she probably knows how to treat a woman

not if you want the real news.