I hear Breitbart is a raging alcoholic who acts completely inappropriately when he’s drunk, which is frequently. Fair topic for discussion.

Longuerdo, I’m guessing you are one of the people who believes this:

NEW DETAILS: Weiner’s Press Conference was FAKE!!

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/06/982673/-Weiners-Press-Conference-was-FAKE

he hoped the picture would keep supporters of Weiner from attempting to “go after” the women with whom Weiner communicated. “I have the photo.”

You mean the way hard left hate blogger Markos went after those girls (some underage) to intimidate them into backing away and protecting a Dem. Andrew released just enough to get Weiner to tell the truth and no more. Think Markos would do that… HELL NO. And if Markos keeps up the drumbeat of intimidation Weiner should get him to back off or risk being further humiliated.

Well remember how the Clinton machine went after all of Bill’s gals Tat? Little Dickie has great mentors!

Liberal Tormentor said:
Well remember how the Clinton machine went after all of Bill’s gals Tat? Little Dickie has great mentors!

Yep. One had her cat killed… classy. But I’d bet a million Markos would do that in a second.

Breitbart is a good man .

A warrior for the good guys . Fearless . Relentless .

Smeared by the the left continuously .

But , has not been wrong yet .

Longuerdo said:

“I hear Breitbart is a raging alcoholic who acts completely inappropriately when he’s drunk, which is frequently. Fair topic for discussion.”

Okay, so let’s be fair and discuss this. But, before we do, could you tell us where you hear that from? Or is that another of those “unnamed sources” the left seems to depend so much on? Could be, you know.

Those unnamed sources seem to have all the best scoop.

Longuerdo said:
I hear Breitbart is a raging alcoholic who acts completely inappropriately when he’s drunk, which is frequently. Fair topic for discussion.

saul?
is it you?

Longuerdo said:
I hear Breitbart is a raging alcoholic who acts completely inappropriately when he’s drunk, which is frequently. Fair topic for discussion.

Are you specifically referencing the 21 April adult beverage (since the common term is moderated out) party in D.C., or the 6 May C-Span appearance, or something else?

Watching tv news, I was skeptical of his reports, but upon examination, he is generally right on! I was happy that he was at that presser. It forced the media folks to insist on a Breitbart apology from Weiner.

Big Eddie said:
Breitbart is a good man .

A warrior for the good guys . Fearless . Relentless .

Smeared by the the left continuously .

But , has not been wrong yet .

That was and oft-repeated theme of the American press when writing of der Führer throughout the 30′s, but it doesn’t really fit here. Breitbart has but a small following and lacks any power.

If Weiner had only lied about WMD’s; the right wing would be willing to forgive and forget.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
That was and oft-repeated theme of the American press when writing of der Führer throughout the 30’s, but it doesn’t really fit here.

Prove it . Did you save the papers from back then ?

Allen West gives his opinion at a town hall meeting. Who doesn’t want to hear what he says on this subject matter? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoIlVJu6qtg

Longuerdo said:
I hear Breitbart is a raging alcoholic who acts completely inappropriately when he’s drunk, which is frequently. Fair topic for discussion.

I heard that Brietbart is not an elected official, I also heard Obama used to be quite the cocaine snorter and would walk the streets aimlessly making people who saw him very leery!

Breitbart is ” A knight without armor in a savage land ” .

Wire Breitbart , Hollywood .

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
That was and oft-repeated theme of the American press when writing of der Führer throughout the 30’s, but it doesn’t really fit here. Breitbart has but a small following and lacks any power.

Oh come on… let’s not go down THAT road. Godwin would not be happy. I don’t like when the right side brings up the night of long knives or the night of broken glass when talking about Obama. Leave that stuff to Beck and Olbermann.

The personal attacks on Breitbart seem to be missing the point that he was right about the photos and Weiner admitted to it.

Longuerdo said:
I hear Breitbart is a raging alcoholic who acts completely inappropriately when he’s drunk, which is frequently. Fair topic for discussion.

If you don’t have pictures, it didn’t happen.

MEDIAITE:

Now that Breitbart has been vindicated, how about a post about Palin being correct on the history of Paul Revere? Many Historians agree with her! I think you deemed what she said as revisionist history.

Please research and correct!

Fact: Here it is a Weiner replay. Uncle uncle uncle…….. Hahahahahahaha…………

tatboy said:
THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
That was and oft-repeated theme of the American press when writing of der Führer throughout the 30’s, but it doesn’t really fit here. Breitbart has but a small following and lacks any power.

Oh come on… let’s not go down THAT road. Godwin would not be happy. I don’t like when the right side brings up the night of long knives or the night of broken glass when talking about Obama. Leave that stuff to Beck and Olbermann.

I seldom use that imagery, but Big Petty’s language was far too evocative of that same situation. Anyone who looks for a political savior is a bit demented. In this instance, I have no apology.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
That was and oft-repeated theme of the American press when writing of der Führer throughout the 30’s, but it doesn’t really fit here. Breitbart has but a small following and lacks any power.

Thanks, Godwin. Your FAIL for today has been duly noted.

macombman said:
Allen West gives his opinion at a town hall meeting. Who doesn’t want to hear what he says on this subject matter? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoIlVJu6qtg

Well, if you do not like West’s beliefs and speeches, you are a racist! Right?

juan said:
MEDIAITE:

Now that Breitbart has been vindicated, how about a post about Palin being correct on the history of Paul Revere? Many Historians agree with her! I think you deemed what she said as revisionist history.

Please research and correct!

Maybe this will help from NPR:

Monday, June 6, 2011

Suffolk Univ. History Prof. – Palin Right About Paul Revere

In the continuing saga, in which Palin is being savaged and mocked, please listen to this NPR interview with Robert Allison, a professor and historian at Suffolk University, in which Allison argues that while Palin may have had some details wrong, she mostly was correct about Paul Revere’s ride, including the ringing of bells and firing of shots as warning to the British:

http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2011/06/suffolk-univ-history-prof-palin-right.html

Big Eddie said:
Breitbart is a good man .

A warrior for the good guys . Fearless . Relentless .

Smeared by the the left continuously .

But , has not been wrong yet .

Breitbark has found the path to surefire riches. The radical righties will always back anyone who will do a reach around for them.

writer said:
The personal attacks on Breitbart seem to be missing the point that he was right about the photos and Weiner admitted to it.

“itwasextortion” just ask him…wait, he changed names, again.

It’s pretty comical how conservative the commentership is on Mediaite–I like how every single comment that doesn’t express a conservative point of view is unequivocally downvoted.

juan said:
MEDIAITE:

Now that Breitbart has been vindicated, how about a post about Palin being correct on the history of Paul Revere? Many Historians agree with her! I think you deemed what she said as revisionist history.

Please research and correct!

No. No she wasn’t right. Read/listen to what she said again

RockingChair said:
It’s pretty comical how conservative the commentership is on Mediaite–I like how every single comment that doesn’t express a conservative point of view is unequivocally downvoted.

Not here. I’ve seen worse photos in magazine & TV ads for Jockey shorts. To me, this is just another of Andrew Breitbart’s efforts to smear politicians and even federal workers like Shirley Sherrod.

writer said:
The personal attacks on Breitbart seem to be missing the point that he was right about the photos and Weiner admitted to it.

Yeah, 1 success out of 4 attempts. Real winner there!

So you’re admitting Breitbart was right.

Gorgegirl said:
Not here. I’ve seen worse photos in magazine & TV ads for Jockey shorts. To me, this is just another of Andrew Breitbart’s efforts to smear politicians and even federal workers like Shirley Sherrod.

Then why do you suppose so many Democrats are calling for him to resign?

Bill Huggins said:
Yeah, 1 success out of 4 attempts. Real winner there!

I think you have your math wrong. He was right on ACORN, Shirley Sherrod, Pigford, and Little Dickie.

Liberal Tormentor said:
I think you have your math wrong. He was right on ACORN, Shirley Sherrod, Pigford, and Little Dickie.

Please explain to us how he was “right” in those instances, since they’ve all been proven as manipulated.

Palin?

Breibart needs to be put in jail!!

Bill Huggins said:
Please explain to us how he was “right” in those instances, since they’ve all been proven as manipulated.

Palin?

Even The Blaze debunked the supposed unedited video:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/does-raw-video-of-npr-expose-reveal-questionable-editing-tactics/

What people need to understand is that that in the digital age of media, things are a lot more ambiguous than they appear and because of that everyone’s a cynic…everyone’s an expert because they played with photoshop elements once or twice or used iMovie to edit their kid’s piano recital.

Breitbart’s in a good position because he just collects the footage and presents it to the public. He doesn’t have the be accountable for the content other people produce. There’s a great article in Wired magazine about him from a year or so ago.

Notice how he answered the question regarding if he would do the same thing if it was about a GOP member? He didn’t really say yes or no. He did say “absolutely” but that was only when she started to ask the question.

“Would you go after a member of congress-”
“Absolutely”
” – a GOP member of congress as strongly as Weiner?”
“…..if they came to me with the story but here’s the dynamic that’s hard for people to accept this premise…”

then he went right into how people come to him with a stories on democrats with the idea that it couldn’t get covered if it went to another outlet. But it still doesn’t answer the question. Would he have covered Mark Sanford this way or does this this suggest that he doesn’t get stories of the same kind of corruption coming from members of the GOP?

Yoda002 said:
Breibart needs to be put in jail!!

Wow… I know of a few countries where they put people in jail for printing things the Govt does not like. I hope we are never that country. McCarthry (sp) would be proud.

bealzebubba said:
Even The Blaze debunked the supposed unedited video:http://www.theblaze.com/stories/does-raw-video-of-npr-expose-reveal-questionable-editing-tactics/ What people need to understand is that that in the digital age of media, things are a lot more ambiguous than they appear and because of that everyone’s a cynic…everyone’s an expert because they played with photoshop elements once or twice or used iMovie to edit their kid’s piano recital. Breitbart’s in a good position because he just collects the footage and presents it to the public. He doesn’t have the be accountable for the content other people produce. There’s a great article in Wired magazine about him from a year or so ago. Notice how he answered the question regarding if he would do the same thing if it was about a GOP member? He didn’t really say yes or no. He did say “absolutely” but that was only when she started to ask the question. “Would you go after a member of congress-”“Absolutely”” – a GOP member of congress as strongly as Weiner?”“…..if they came to me with the story but here’s the dynamic that’s hard for people to accept this premise…” then he went right into how people come to him with a stories on democrats with the idea that it couldn’t get covered if it went to another outlet. But it still doesn’t answer the question. Would he have covered Mark Sanford this way or does this this suggest that he doesn’t get stories of the same kind of corruption coming from members of the GOP?

Proven… really. Maybe by your psyco left web sites and MSNBC. Daily Kos?, Media Matters? So the ACORN lady DIDN’T try and help pimp underage children in the sex trade? Nice to know what your willing to make excuses for in the name of politics.

I’m going to assume you were addressing someone else because I didnt say a thing about ACORN.

Yoda002 said:
Breibart needs to be put in jail!!

For what, exactly?

/Can’t wait to hear *this* explanation….

bealzebubba said:
I’m going to assume you were addressing someone else because I didnt say a thing about ACORN.

Sorry… that one was for Bill who was quoted in your post.

Yoda002 said:
Breibart needs to be put in jail!!

No, he doesn’t need to be put in jail..he just needs to be challenged by a reciprocal figure that will do for the left what Breitbart does for the right.

quote from Wired magazine:

“The idea is that I have to screw with media, and I have to screw with the Left, in order to give legitimate stories the ability to reach their natural watermark,”

tatboy said:
Sorry… that one was for Bill who was quoted in your post.

No worries…it’s just the inter-toobs.

bealzebubba said:
Even The Blaze debunked the supposed unedited video:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/does-raw-video-of-npr-expose-reveal-questionable-editing-tactics/

http://patterico.com/2011/03/14/on-the-blazes-accusations-of-misleading-editing-by-okeefe/

I apparently got “moderated” earlier for a comment I thought was
well thought out and structured to the subject at hand!
So I will be very nice this time!
WHO is more credible at this moment?
Weiner or Brietbart?? UMMMMM?

I woulkd release that remaining picture so damn quick
these libs would not know what hit ‘em !!!

would :-0

“This man (Weiner) must resign. We simply cannot have this sort of thing ot there.” – Larry Craig

Liberal Tormentor said:
I think you have your math wrong. He was right on ACORN, Shirley Sherrod, Pigford, and Little Dickie.

Don’t forget the N word claims from CBC members parading through tea partiers after the Obamacare vote. Breitbart absolutely debunked that democrat fabricated crap

bealzebubba said:
No, he doesn’t need to be put in jail..he just needs to be challenged by a reciprocal figure that will do for the left what Breitbart does for the right.

You’ve got to be kidding. The ENTIRE leftist controlled media does for the left what you claim Breitbart does for the right. Breitbart is the exception to the biased MSM rule. That’s why they’re trying their damnedest to discredit him.

Breitbart should get the Pulitzer Prize for Kicking Over Rocks While Lefty Scorpions Scuttle Away .

But , Pulitzers are almost as meaningless as Nobel Prizes .

Breitbart has the Weiner pics as his screen saver.

tatboy said:
Proven… really. Maybe by your psyco left web sites and MSNBC. Daily Kos?, Media Matters? So the ACORN lady DIDN’T try and help pimp underage children in the sex trade? Nice to know what your willing to make excuses for in the name of politics.

Yeah. She didn’t. No excuses, just the facts ma’am.

How did Breitbart get all this material? The original was not even sent. Surely all these women did not betray Mr. Weiner. Surely Mr. Weiner did not give it to him. I would never dream of handing over such material to a sleasebag like Breitbart for any amount of money. I hope those women never get another date for the rest of heir lives if they betrayed Weiner for money. They are backstabbers. If I said what I really thought of them, my post would be pulled. Was this some elaborate trap organised by Breitbart?

I am disgusted by Americans the way they have turned on Wiener as if he were a child rapist. Almost EVERYONE has done something equally embarrassing. It is an orgy of utter hypocrisy. Oddly the left like Chris Matthews and Jonathan Capehart have been just as bad as Breitbart.. It is like night of the living Girolamo Savonarolas with all the prudish zombie clones stomping about leading the witch hunt.

If Weiner went postal and axe murdered those tormenting him, and I were on the jury, I would acquit. They bloody well deserved it. Their behaviour in inexcusable.

Big Eddie said:
Breitbart is a good man .

A warrior for the good guys . Fearless . Relentless .

Smeared by the the left continuously .

But , has not been wrong yet .

No, he isn’t. And yes, he has.

RoedyGreen said:
How did Breitbart get all this material? The original was not even sent. Surely all these women did not betray Mr. Weiner. Surely Mr. Weiner did not give it to him. I would never dream of handing over such material to a sleasebag like Breitbart for any amount of money. I hope those women never get another date for the rest of heir lives if they betrayed Weiner for money. They are backstabbers. If I said what I really thought of them, my post would be pulled. Was this some elaborate trap organised by Breitbart?

I am disgusted by Americans the way they have turned on Wiener as if he were a child rapist. Almost EVERYONE has done something equally embarrassing. It is an orgy of utter hypocrisy. Oddly the left like Chris Matthews and Jonathan Capehart have been just as bad as Breitbart.. It is like night of the living Girolamo Savonarolas with all the prudish zombie clones stomping about leading the witch hunt.

If Weiner went postal and axe murdered those tormenting him, and I were on the jury, I would acquit. They bloody well deserved it. Their behaviour in inexcusable.

It’s obvious that ‘the women’ were plants, tapping into Weiner’s weakness. Duh.

Big Eddie said:
Breitbart should get the Pulitzer Prize for Kicking Over Rocks While Lefty Scorpions Scuttle Away .

But , Pulitzers are almost as meaningless as Nobel Prizes .

He ‘kicked over rocks?’ More like he set Weiner up. Or got lucky because somebody else did, and used him to get it out there.

Wiener is in the cat seat: All he has to do is agree to resign, but only if Vitter agrees to also. That way, it’s Vitter’s decision. Think about it.