So Bill had a problem with the way GWB was treated??? No??? Shocking!!! Hay Bill you praised the press when they treated Bush like $hit. Now you want to bitch that the office of the prez. is not given the respect you fell it is due. Sorry man… that double standered don’t fly with the thinking part of the population or those that pay attention to your behavior then someone else was in office. You STFU about it then, so STFU about it now Bill.

First, why do people still call Maher a comedian? Does anyone really think the guy is funny? Liberals are WAY too full of hate and rage to be funny. It just doesn’t work.

Second, Matty, could you dig up a comment from the past of Maher being outraged at a tough interview of Bush by the liberal media?

i don’t care if you’re a Conservative, Liberal, Rep, Dem, whatever… if you can’t see that Bill Maher is the nastiest, most hypocritical, most self-serving, and arrogant of ALL the talking heads than i don’t know what else to tell you. this guy is just terrible.

MSLSD is not a news network. It is a network about news networks. If Fox News went hard left, MSLSD would go off the air for lack of things to talk about.

MSNBC will continue it’s downhill slide because this is what it does – replaces reasoned debate with childish insult. MSNBC consistently undersetimates the intelligence of the American public. They and the audience they have left in the end will deserve each other.

Maher can come on there and spew anything he wants and not be challenged by the host. And bit by bit the viewers are going away because of it.

Oh – and Maher is a punk.

Matt is a lib. He sees nothing libs do.

I can understand a tough interview. But O’Loofah’s interview was just embarrassing, for him. To ask how he feels that people hate the President. What a stupid question. He couldn’t think of anything more challenging? I knew Billo wasn’t smart, but he proved it with that question.

As for Bill Maher, he is VERY funny. Maybe not to you. And the people with rage issues are the right wing zealots who post here. You are most definitely NOT funny. Just pitiful, like Billo the Clown.

Oh I know Gordon, I just like to point it out. Don’t want him to think he’s actually fooling us into thinking he’s impartial.

I wouldn’t go so far as to say unpatriotic, but definitely disrespectful. Beck? Total messiah complex though. Any man that thinks God is on his side in all that he does has a messiah complex. Good weather on the day of your rally does not denote God being on your side.

Is it me or is their an exceptional campaign and hard-on against Glenn Beck lately?

I am use to the barbs coming from MSNBC and that is a sad, pitiful joke right now, but Maher…. what is up with him and Beck lately?

Libby, if I cared what you think, I might be hurt. Fortunately, your opinion couldn’t posibly mean any less to me. Have a great day/

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
First, why do people still call Maher a comedian? Does anyone really think the guy is funny? Liberals are WAY too full of hate and rage to be funny. It just doesn’t work.

Second, Matty, could you dig up a comment from the past of Maher being outraged at a tough interview of Bush by the liberal media?

So basically Maher is like a left-wing Limbaugh?

UNreasonable lib says:

Any man that thinks God is on his side in all that he does has a messiah complex.

Well Soros has admitted to thinking he’s God, so you must really loathe him.

No UNreasonable lib, Rush is actually funny. Probably because he doesn’t seethe with rage. And if you say he does, you’re just proving you don’t listen to him, so don’t bother.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
So basically Maher is like a left-wing Limbaugh?

Limbaugh actually believes what he says. Maher has no conviction in his body excpect to the dollar. Back in the day (mid-90’s) he used to be a hard-core libertarian while on Comedy Central’s Politically Incorrect, but when HBO gave him a contract (via ABC), he IMMEDIATELY switched his “deeply held convictions” and became a far-left loon. The only difference between Com Cen. and HBO is the fact that HBO pays more so its obvious that Maher switched his views for the buck.

I’m sure if you offered him $20, he’d become a Tea Partier.

MAHER = PHONEY-ASSED BITCH

Maher = hypocrisy incarnate.

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
UNreasonable lib says:

Any man that thinks God is on his side in all that he does has a messiah complex.

Well Soros has admitted to thinking he’s God, so you must really loathe him.

He has a messiah complex, same as Beck. What’s your point? I don’t know why you think every liberal hinges on the words of soros like you neocons do Beck.

In a one on one interview O’Reilly did ask a few dipshit questions like WHY DO PEOPLE HATE YOU and DO YOU RESPECT FOX? The tone was wrong and Bill was obviously playing games.
I wouldn’t say Bill was unpatriotic, just his usual douche bag self.

Also, don’t mix apples and oranges. This topic isn’t how the press treats a president in the media, it is about how an interviewer treats him in a one on one.
Two different things.
I think O’Reilly generally did a good job, but I think in those couple of instances he was off-base. They were self serving questions.

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
No UNreasonable lib, Rush is actually funny. Probably because he doesn’t seethe with rage. And if you say he does, you’re just proving you don’t listen to him, so don’t bother.

Rush is funny because he panders to your view and Maher is funny to me because he panders to mine. It’s a matter of tastes. He does too, I have listened to him. you’ve never watched Maher because he doesn’t.

I carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control otherwise they might get me into trouble. -George Soros

Unreasonable Lib, Can you link to something that Beck has said that’s close to that because I’ve never heard him say anything of the sort.

Maher doesn’t matter.

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
No UNreasonable lib, Rush is actually funny.

If you find blasphemy, condescension, racism and xenophobia funny, as I am sure you do, he is, indeed, a real knee-slapping hoot.

libbyliberal said:
I can understand a tough interview. But O’Loofah’s interview was just embarrassing, for him. To ask how he feels that people hate the President. What a stupid question. He couldn’t think of anything more challenging? I knew Billo wasn’t smart, but he proved it with that question. As for Bill Maher, he is VERY funny. Maybe not to you. And the people with rage issues are the right wing zealots who post here. You are most definitely NOT funny. Just pitiful, like Billo the Clown.

Obviously you didn’t see the interview and you’re being TOLD HOW TO THINK from your lefty websites. If you had seen the interview, you’d see tough questions about Egypt, Muslim Brotherhood, Health Care/Supreme Court, freedom, redistribution, taxes, deficit/debt . . .

Dude, start thinking for yourself instead of following what your Masters at Kos are telling you. Sheep.

BFD said:
In a one on one interview O’Reilly did ask a few dipshit questions like WHY DO PEOPLE HATE YOU and DO YOU RESPECT FOX? The tone was wrong and Bill was obviously playing games.
I wouldn’t say Bill was unpatriotic, just his usual douche bag self.

Also, don’t mix apples and oranges. This topic isn’t how the press treats a president in the media, it is about how an interviewer treats him in a one on one.
Two different things.
I think O’Reilly generally did a good job, but I think in those couple of instances he was off-base. They were self serving questions.

Your points are well made.

I do not think Baal-o was being unpatriotic. He was being self-absorbed.

I do not think Baal-o is a good interviewer. Like Lard Limbaugh, he is at his best when he is talking about himself. I find that terribly boring. I would characterize the interview as “adequate”.

BFD said:
In a one on one interview O’Reilly did ask a few dipshit questions like WHY DO PEOPLE HATE YOU and DO YOU RESPECT FOX? The tone was wrong and Bill was obviously playing games.I wouldn’t say Bill was unpatriotic, just his usual douche bag self. Also, don’t mix apples and oranges. This topic isn’t how the press treats a president in the media, it is about how an interviewer treats him in a one on one.Two different things.I think O’Reilly generally did a good job, but I think in those couple of instances he was off-base. They were self serving questions.

Most people on both side have praised the interview and BOTH men in volved in it. Only the 10%ers have had an issuie so far…. like Bill. Oh well… back to COD Worlds at War. *it’s my first day off in a while*

Royal dimwit says:

If you find blasphemy, condescension, racism and xenophobia funny, as I am sure you do, he is, indeed, a real knee-slapping hoot.

I don’t which is probably why I don’t find you at all funny.

i can handle the likes of Olby, Madow, Mathews, etc… but i can’t accuraltey put into words how much i dislike Maher. there really is just something about him that oozes hatred and arrogance. i’m not a very religious person, but i have to question what makes a person make it their life’s mission to attack, bellittle, and tear down religion. hey Bill, how about, “to each their own”, and shut your mouth.

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
I carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control otherwise they might get me into trouble. -George Soros

Unreasonable Lib, Can you link to something that Beck has said that’s close to that because I’ve never heard him say anything of the sort.

“I’m sick of doing your research for you”
- Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window)

I can’t link to something that doesn’t exist UNreasonable Lib. Check mate again!

I do agree with Maher about O’Beckerhead’s Messiah complex. It is getting the best of him, and the attacks have begun coming from the right, as well they should.

O’Beckerhead is also facing a bit of a backlash from Christian conservatives now. He spends much of his time preaching these days, but not an orthodox theology. With each passing day he seems to be falling more and more into a very deep, dark hole of heresy. One of the local mega Southern Baptist churches in our area, a very conservative church, spent a good portion of its characteristically lengthy sermon using Power Points of O’Beckerhead heresies to educate on Christian orthodoxy. That says a great deal to me since this is the very mindset so slavishly devoted to O’Beckerhead. I think he’s in a bit of trouble, and he realizes it. In fact, he has been addressing it in a shrill, non-productive manner.

tatboy said:
Only the 10%ers have had an issuie so far

I think most people would agree they didn’t need to hear O’Reilly fawn over himself a couple of times that he felt he was fair and not a hater.
After all, I’m pretty sure it was an interview of the President, not O’Reilly.

Methinks he was blowing smoke out of his huge egotistical ass.

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
Royal dimwit says:

If you find blasphemy, condescension, racism and xenophobia funny, as I am sure you do, he is, indeed, a real knee-slapping hoot.

I don’t which is probably why I don’t find you at all funny.

An unusually weak retort, Tormented Michelle.

It is important to note that during the Bush adminstration it was considered anti-American and akin to being a traitor if you ever were critical of the Bush adminstrations policy. Can you imagine if Lawrence O’Donnell had interviewed President Bush during his Presidency and interrupted him 33 times in 15 minutes and ask him why do people hate you THEY HATE YOU!

O’Reilly is a guy that doesn’t respect the office of the Presidency, You can hate Obama all you want but respect the office, but obviously that is too much to ask for these antiamerican pos’s

Semper_Map said:
i can handle the likes of Olby, Madow, Mathews, etc… but i can’t accuraltey put into words how much i dislike Maher. there really is just something about him that oozes hatred and arrogance. i’m not a very religious person, but i have to question what makes a person make it their life’s mission to attack, bellittle, and tear down religion. hey Bill, how about, “to each their own”, and shut your mouth.

I have a different ideological perspective than you, and I find Maher at times immensely clever and humorous at times. Rare times. Generally, I find him insufferable and intolerable. I find him every bit as blasphemous as Lard Limbaugh.

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
I can’t link to something that doesn’t exist UNreasonable Lib. Check mate again!

Again? You have yet to checkmate once.
“God speaks through me”
“We must go to God Boot Camp and straighten our own lives up so we can help people out in the rest of the world and guide them down the stairs and out of the building into safety.”
“God is giving me a plan”
Please tell me what you would say to somebody who is not a minister yet says that God speaks through them and is giving them a plan? Messiah complex.

Color Me Badd said:
It is important to note that during the Bush adminstration it was considered anti-American and akin to being a traitor if you ever were critical of the Bush adminstrations policy. Can you imagine if Lawrence O’Donnell had interviewed President Bush during his Presidency and interrupted him 33 times in 15 minutes and ask him why do people hate you THEY HATE YOU! O’Reilly is a guy that doesn’t respect the office of the Presidency, You can hate Obama all you want but respect the office, but obviously that is too much to ask for these antiamerican pos’s

wait, did i miss something?? i can remeber the media’s treatment of Bush for 8 years. some folks have some really, and i mean REALLY, thin skin and short memories.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
Again? You have yet to checkmate once.
“God speaks through me”
“We must go to God Boot Camp and straighten our own lives up so we can help people out in the rest of the world and guide them down the stairs and out of the building into safety.”
“God is giving me a plan”
Please tell me what you would say to somebody who is not a minister yet says that God speaks through them and is giving them a plan? Messiah complex.

Don’t forget when he saw birds flying and thought it was a miracle come to Bless his rally!!! lolol

Unreasonable lib there is a diffence in thinking you ARE God and thinking that God has some plan for you and is guiding your life. If you can’t see that, then I can’t help you.

The Real Royal King said:
I have a different ideological perspective than you, and I find Maher at times immensely clever and humorous at times. Rare times. Generally, I find him insufferable and intolerable. I find him every bit as blasphemous as Lard Limbaugh.

yeah, i’ve never said he wasn’t funny or clever at times, because he is. that said, i just can’t stand him.

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
I can’t link to something that doesn’t exist UNreasonable Lib. Check mate again!

Oh, I forgot the proclamation of the day of his rally being “divine providence”. There was also the whole “expect a ‘miracle’” on the day of the rally thing.

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
Unreasonable lib there is a diffence in thinking you ARE God and thinking that God has some plan for you and is guiding your life. If you can’t see that, then I can’t help you.

I can see that. But do you see how somebody who says this things has a messiah complex? If you cannot then there is no hope for you.

Color Me Badd said:
It is important to note that during the Bush adminstration it was considered anti-American and akin to being a traitor if you ever were critical of the Bush adminstrations policy. Can you imagine if Lawrence O’Donnell had interviewed President Bush during his Presidency and interrupted him 33 times in 15 minutes and ask him why do people hate you THEY HATE YOU! O’Reilly is a guy that doesn’t respect the office of the Presidency, You can hate Obama all you want but respect the office, but obviously that is too much to ask for these antiamerican pos’s

Way to re-write history. But it’s nice to know the world as you see it in your mind. And the onslaught of people posting examples of the pres being $hitty to GWB in 3…2…

Bill Maher: O’Reilly’s ‘Unpatriotic’ Obama Interview ”

LOL

Unpatriotic? What a joke Maher is- he was upset that O’Reilly didn’t bow to Barry like Brian Williams did.

Bill Maher is a deeply unintelligent and deeply intolerant person. It is always interesting to see how he will embarrass himself next.

Yet when Maher was referring to Bush as Dummy McStupid, his dissent was the highest form of patriotism.

Proof that marijuana makes you mean old sad has been comedian. I actually stopped watching his show this season, couldn’t stand his hate anymore.

Color Me Badd said:
It is important to note that during the Bush adminstration it was considered anti-American and akin to being a traitor if you ever were critical of the Bush adminstrations policy. Can you imagine if Lawrence O’Donnell had interviewed President Bush during his Presidency and interrupted him 33 times in 15 minutes and ask him why do people hate you THEY HATE YOU! O’Reilly is a guy that doesn’t respect the office of the Presidency, You can hate Obama all you want but respect the office, but obviously that is too much to ask for these antiamerican pos’s

Can you please give examples of the myth about Buth/anti-American

tatboy said:
Way to re-write history. But it’s nice to know the world as you see it in your mind. And the onslaught of people posting examples of the pres being $hitty to GWB in 3…2…

I invite you to post a video of a major cable news host treating President Bush like this. I am waiting.

Maher & O’Donnell….Libs backslapping other Libs. Ho-Hum.

Bill Maher and Lawrence O’Donnell took on Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck…

NO WAY!? I am SHOCKED! Shocked I tell ya!

writer said:
Yet when Maher was referring to Bush as Dummy McStupid, his dissent was the highest form of patriotism.

exactly.

Where was this outrage when the MSM used to constantly belittle Bush and treat him like a hostile witness during interviews? Oh wait, Maher is a partisan douche bag.

Obama filibusters. He’s the only guy who can stretch the words ‘And’ and ‘But’ into paragraphs of their own. I’m thrilled that O’Reilly chopped Obamo at the knees; someone needs to.

Dronetek said:
Where was this outrage when the MSM used to constantly belittle Bush and treat him like a hostile witness during interviews? Oh wait, Maher is a partisan douche bag.

There is nothing wrong with challenging the President, even treating him like a hostile witness, that comes with the job. But there is a huge difference between that and total disrespect for the office of the Presdent, it shouldn’t matter who is President, respect the office. Like Bill said Obama was voted into office by the majority of the country, he crushed McCain electorally. He won, and your side lost. You guys cant stand that and 2 years later aren’t willing to let it go. Sore losers if you ask me that is where this all comes from. I won’t even say it is race, no matter who would have beat McCain the same thing would be going on.

It is disgraceful and only outs the people who show this kind of disrespect as anti-american and willing to debase the leader of our country, which foreign despots and jerks see. People in North Korea and Iran love the way you disrespect our president, and it gives aid and comfort to our enemies.

once again, Mediate hypes Maher like he is some sort of icon in our society. The folks don’t care what he thinks, says or does so please find another chief source for your posts. Goodness. Perhaps he is a big stock holder in Mediaite if he is not screwing someone here.

writer said:
Yet when Maher was referring to Bush as Dummy McStupid, his dissent was the highest form of patriotism.

that was on his HBO show on Friday at 10pm at night. Not to his face at an interview before the Superbowl for the world to think, this is how we treat our president.

Bill Maher is very funny and host’s the only show on TV worth looking at. (Other than the Daily show)

Roklan said:
that was on his HBO show on Friday at 10pm at night. Not to his face at an interview before the Superbowl for the world to think, this is how we treat our president.

Bill Maher is very funny and host’s the only show on TV worth looking at. (Other than the Daily show)

Yep equating stuff that commentators said about President Bush on their shows and saying it directly to him in an interview are not close to being the same thing.

But what do you expect from Republicans,

All the stuff they said about “respecting the office” during the Bush admin. was totaly BS as we can see now. They don’t care about the office they care that their side won.

Color Me Badd said:
I invite you to post a video of a major cable news host treating President Bush like this. I am waiting.

http://www.ratherbiased.com/bush_attack.htm

sarainitaly said:
http://www.ratherbiased.com/bush_attack.htm

Oh ya… I forgot about that one. Ahhhhh the classics. :)

sarainitaly said:
http://www.ratherbiased.com/bush_attack.htm

Horrible example, first of all wrong Bush. Second of all if you know the background on this, Bush refused to talk about Iran Contra to anyone and here he was running for President, You do realize that crimes were committed in Iran/Contra right. Rather was challenging him on Iran/Contra and of course Republicans hate that cause Bush was guilty as sin.

tatboy said:
Oh ya… I forgot about that one. Ahhhhh the classics. :)

Yeah it totally sucks that a journalist would challenge a Presidental candidate who sold arms to terrorists, who used those arms to kill our allies! How dare Rather do that!

RRKING musing . Last week , Army said to me : ‘” Garth , people don ‘ t understand us ” . So , to clear things up :

RRKING ® clearing things up . There is a misconception about my chum Armando and I . We are not a couple . We are merely two bachelor hair stylists who have lived together since 1949 , when we met at Beauty College . Yes , I have two kitties . Yes , we write poems for each other and exchange Valentine’s Day gifts . All friends do that . Army had a bunny for a while , but somehow it got away when Arms was out . Yes , we did hair and makeup for Liberace long ago . So what ? He too was a swinging young fellow that people misunderstood . We are both single guys who just haven’t met the right woman yet . I’ m beginning to think that may not happen . Actually ,at the bars we frequent , you never see any women . At all . Hmm . ©

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
I wouldn’t go so far as to say unpatriotic, but definitely disrespectful.

Color Me Badd said:
It is important to note that during the Bush adminstration it was considered anti-American and akin to being a traitor if you ever were critical of the Bush adminstrations policy. Can you imagine if Lawrence O’Donnell had interviewed President Bush during his Presidency and interrupted him 33 times in 15 minutes and ask him why do people hate you THEY HATE YOU! O’Reilly is a guy that doesn’t respect the office of the Presidency, You can hate Obama all you want but respect the office, but obviously that is too much to ask for these antiamerican pos’s

Color Me Badd said:
I invite you to post a video of a major cable news host treating President Bush like this. I am waiting.

Here’s something I don’t understand from the left… maybe you can answer it for me.

When Olbermann made his infamous “Special Comment,” telling President Bush to “Shut the hell up,” he was praised for being so bold, so brash, so hardcore. However, when O’Reilly asks President Obama, how he deals with people hating him… he’s called unpatriotic and disrespectful.

Exactly how does that work? What is the logic that says one is okay, the other isn’t, and somehow doesn’t conclude with, “We have a double standard”?

PS-
Badd… people weren’t considered “anti-American” because they disagreed with Bush. That’s a lie.

Color Me Badd said:
It is disgraceful and only outs the people who show this kind of disrespect as anti-american and willing to debase the leader of our country, which foreign despots and jerks see.

Weren’t you the same person who was critical of lefties being “akin to being a traitor if you ever were critical of the Bush adminstrations policy.”?

Not only are you a lefty puppet, but you’re also a hypocrite

sarainitaly said:
http://www.ratherbiased.com/bush_attack.htm

It’s very sad that this is all you have and you attempted to use it as proof for your argument. I actually looked forward to someone treating war-criminal Bush the way he needed to be treated. That link was useless. Please try again

ImNotBlue said:
Badd… people weren’t considered “anti-American” because they disagreed with Bush. That’s a lie.

That’s so true. That dude can’t find one example of someone being called “anti-American” for being critical to GWB’s policies, however, he/she will call us “anti-American” for being worried about BHO bankrupting our country and selling out our allies.

The Real Royal King said:
I have a different ideological perspective than you, and I find Maher at times immensely clever and humorous at times. Rare times. Generally, I find him insufferable and intolerable. I find him every bit as blasphemous as Lard Limbaugh.

One thing about you, king nitpick, you do wear your bias on your sleeve. And on your head, and leg, and face, and foot, and probably ample a$$, and on your bruised and dimpled chin. And did you learn haughty from watching the John Kerry campaign all those years ago? You seem to struggle so hard to sound intelligent and refined, when, just like him, you are neither.

ImNotBlue said:
PS-
Badd… people weren’t considered “anti-American” because they disagreed with Bush. That’s a lie.

Can’t imagine why the term *un-America* was ever used back then….

http://www.ringospictures.com/index.php?page=20090816
http://www.zombietime.com/hall_of_shame/
http://www.zombietime.com/sf_rally_february_16_2003/

Color Me Badd said:
Horrible example, first of all wrong Bush. Second of all if you know the background on this, Bush refused to talk about Iran Contra to anyone and here he was running for President, You do realize that crimes were committed in Iran/Contra right. Rather was challenging him on Iran/Contra and of course Republicans hate that cause Bush was guilty as sin.

You are colored bad. Quite bad. In fact, you get colored worse every time you post. How many shades of yellow-green can there be?

Roklan said:
It’s very sad that this is all you have and you attempted to use it as proof for your argument. I actually looked forward to someone treating war-criminal Bush the way he needed to be treated. That link was useless. Please try again

Color Me Badd said:
I invite you to post a video of a major cable news host treating President Bush like this. I am waiting.

don’t need to. this one popped in my head. how is this link “useless” as a response to her request? *eyeroll*

i don’t think anyone doubts how bush was treated in the media during his presidency.

sarainitaly said:
Color Me Badd said:I invite you to post a video of a major cable news host treating President Bush like this. I am waiting. don’t need to. this one popped in my head. how is this link “useless” as a response to her request? *eyeroll* i don’t think anyone doubts how bush was treated in the media during his presidency.

Looks like Color Me Badd went running away with his/her tail between the legs…facts always crush emotion

sarainitaly said:
http://www.ratherbiased.com/bush_attack.htm

Anything you post for him will be dismissed outright, or will need to be explained for him. Either way he is as useless as they come for dialogue here. Maher is a hero of the left, so Mr. Badd is there to defend.

tatboy said:
Oh ya… I forgot about that one. Ahhhhh the classics. :)

A link about our President selling guns to our enemies is your argument? Give me free healthcare for the poor any-day before you give me “Well American armed” Terrorist. And Rather still wasn’t has condescending to “George-Hell-Walks Bush.” As Bill O’reilly was. I actually used to like Bill while hating everyone else on Fox. I should have known that love affair wouldn’t last to long

BTW: what are the rest of the words on the list that “Hate” is supposedly being added to? A bunch of racism? Is that where he doesn’t want to add new words in fear of wiping out all of Fox new’s vocabulary when discussing issues?

Roklan said:
It’s very sad that this is all you have and you attempted to use it as proof for your argument. I actually looked forward to someone treating war-criminal Bush the way he needed to be treated. That link was useless. Please try again

Do drone attacks in Pakistan, mean 0bama is a war criminal now?

ndanielson said:
Roklan said:
It’s very sad that this is all you have and you attempted to use it as proof for your argument. I actually looked forward to someone treating war-criminal Bush the way he needed to be treated. That link was useless. Please try agai

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/28/world/asia/28drones.html

Did 0bama just get turned down in his bid to extend the Patriot Act that he so decried under Bush? Do you know why it didn’t pass???

ImNotBlue said:
Here’s something I don’t understand from the left… maybe you can answer it for me.

When Olbermann made his infamous “Special Comment,” telling President Bush to “Shut the hell up,” he was praised for being so bold, so brash, so hardcore. However, when O’Reilly asks President Obama, how he deals with people hating him… he’s called unpatriotic and disrespectful.

Exactly how does that work? What is the logic that says one is okay, the other isn’t, and somehow doesn’t conclude with, “We have a double standard”?

PS-
Badd… people weren’t considered “anti-American” because they disagreed with Bush. That’s a lie.

There’s a difference between telling somebody something from far away and being face to face disrespectful to somebody. wouldn’t you agree? If somebody talks smack about you from afar you just brush it off but if somebody is up in your face you are bound to be more upset, no? I urge you to show me a video of somebody doing the same thing that O’Reilly and Baier did to President Obama to President Bush.

And yeah, they kinda were. I take you to Sean Hannity saying Mr. Cohen “hated America”

RRKING pontificates . Yes , Bill Maher is definitely the Mark Twain of our time .

Oh . Did anyone catch the video of when I was in London the other day ? I don ‘t want to brag , but I did chase off some yobs who were trying to rob a jewellery store with my handbag .

ndanielson said:
Do drone attacks in Pakistan, mean 0bama is a war criminal now?

No, Obama is finishing a war that was started on lies. Fighting a war does not make you a war criminal. Bush started a war to make big bucks for his and his cronies companies. The country is in the tank but weapons and oil are doing 100s of times better than they were before the wars.

That makes a war criminal. You should look it up one day

Scott_in_MI said:
Looks like Color Me Badd went running away with his/her tail between the legs…facts always crush emotion

Sheep have a limited range of emotions. Anger, rage, envy. They have so few tools to deal with them: dodge, deceit, lie, and flee.

ndanielson said:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/28/world/asia/28drones.html

Did 0bama just get turned down in his bid to extend the Patriot Act that he so decried under Bush? Do you know why it didn’t pass???

It didn’t pass because it is wrong. A free society does not and should not have their privacy violated in that fashion. Warrants were put in place for a reason. And thank goodness the gangsters in the bush administration and family are not there to say “we don’t care about polls” like they are prone to saying when it comes to them making money. I bet some of that tapping was done on their competition in the said industries.

Ooooooh, so it’s UNPATRIOTIC to question Obama yet when Bush was president wasn’t “dissent the highest form of patriotism?” Bill Maher is such a TOOL!

http://libertarians4freedom.blogspot.com/

Roklan said:
No, Obama is finishing a war that was started on lies. Fighting a war does not make you a war criminal. Bush started a war to make big bucks for his and his cronies companies. The country is in the tank but weapons and oil are doing 100s of times better than they were before the wars.

That makes a war criminal. You should look it up one day

ndanielson said:
Sheep have a limited range of emotions. Anger, rage, envy. They have so few tools to deal with them: dodge, deceit, lie, and flee.

There you go. Was it your entire democrat party that authorized the invasion of Afghanistan, or was it just 99%? I forget.

Wow – that Bill Maher is one tough hombre! He really is Speaking Truth To Power! Boy, the damage that has been done to us all by two, uh, cable-show hosts, and, uh, 25% of a daytime womans talk show.

Go get them Bill! Thank God we have Maher protecting us from such threats!

And that wasn’t Maher ‘questioning somebody’s patriotism’ was he? I seem to remember when such things were frowned upon by, uh, Mr. Bill Maher.

What a tool.

Roklan said:
It didn’t pass because it is wrong. A free society does not and should not have their privacy violated in that fashion. Warrants were put in place for a reason. And thank goodness the gangsters in the bush administration and family are not there to say “we don’t care about polls” like they are prone to saying when it comes to them making money. I bet some of that tapping was done on their competition in the said industries.

Wrong, again. It was turned down because 26 house REPUBLICANS voted it down. How many democrats voted it down?

Again, why did it get voted down? Because your first, typical knee-jerk answer was wrong. Wanna try again?

PoliticallyIncorrectLibertarian said:
Ooooooh, so it’s UNPATRIOTIC to question Obama yet when Bush was president wasn’t “dissent the highest form of patriotism?” Bill Maher is such a TOOL!

http://libertarians4freedom.blogspot.com/

He never said anything about questioning him. He said THE WAY he questioned him as if he was the authority in the room. You had a hard time in communication arts huh? Should people come into your house and rail you about how the neighbors don’t like you? The White house is Obama’s house! Orielly is a non-news, opinion only reporter. So what he gets high ratings! He’s a talking head on TV. An employee of Rupert Murdoch. Someone who could be fired tomorrow if Rupert felt like it. You show some EFFING respect when you come into the highest respected home in the world. You and Orielly are the tools. No way in the world would Maher go into Bush’s white house with the same condescension and arrogance that he portrays on his show as Orielly did.

Pablo said:
MSLSD is not a news network. It is a network about news networks. If Fox News went hard left, MSLSD would go off the air for lack of things to talk about.

And Mediaite is a site about a network being a network about news networks

Roklan said:
No, Obama is finishing a war that was started on lies. Fighting a war does not make you a war criminal. Bush started a war to make big bucks for his and his cronies companies. The country is in the tank but weapons and oil are doing 100s of times better than they were before the wars.

That makes a war criminal. You should look it up one day

Is there some liberal war crime link that you would recommend? Who makes up this definition of “war criminal?” Lefty clowns made up the definitions of torture, surely you have a favorite site for such things?. Having doctors stand by while 2 murderous thugs have water poured on their faces. Tell that to Daniel Pearl. Or John McCain, for that matter.

Did Bill just throw out ‘Messiah Complex’…man, he’s the authority.

Roklan said:
He never said anything about questioning him. He said THE WAY he questioned him as if he was the authority in the room. You had a hard time in communication arts huh? Should people come into your house and rail you about how the neighbors don’t like you? The White house is Obama’s house! Orielly is a non-news, opinion only reporter. So what he gets high ratings! He’s a talking head on TV. An employee of Rupert Murdoch. Someone who could be fired tomorrow if Rupert felt like it. You show some EFFING respect when you come into the highest respected home in the world. You and Orielly are the tools. No way in the world would Maher go into Bush’s white house with the same condescension and arrogance that he portrays on his show as Orielly did.

Anger, rage, envy, attack. Moral equivalence dodge and weave. You have all the tools, to remain a fool.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
There’s a difference between telling somebody something from far away and being face to face disrespectful to somebody. wouldn’t you agree? If somebody talks smack about you from afar you just brush it off but if somebody is up in your face you are bound to be more upset, no?

i would rather someone ask me direct questions/discuss things with me than hide and talk smack about me like cowards. The media was BRUTAL to Bush, ugly even at times. O’Reilly asked Obama a bunch of softball questions, laughed with him, and kept him from filibustering. He asked if it bothered him that people hated him. You think Obama didn’t know there were nutjobs out there that hated him?

Man up, man. O’Reilly wasn’t disrespectful or unpatriotic or whatever. He asked him questions.

I find that MUCH more respectful than sitting on a barely watched cable channel spouting out vitriol like “YOU SIR ARE A FASCIST!” and “You allowed 9/11 to occur”!

ndanielson said:
Wrong, again. It was turned down because 26 house REPUBLICANS voted it down. How many democrats voted it down?

Again, why did it get voted down? Because your first, typical knee-jerk answer was wrong. Wanna try again?

Actually my typical knee-jerk reaction was right. We All Voted for our house. Republicans may rule it but their seats is our consensus. Which means “US.” And US, our house, the majority of them decided it was the wrong thing to do. Anymore questions oh mighty messiah of political questionnaires?

sarainitaly said:
don’t need to. this one popped in my head. how is this link “useless” as a response to her request? *eyeroll*

Because as soon as you kicked the ball, the goalposts were dragged off the field. I think they’re on the back of a truck flying down the highway now.

Pablo said:
Because as soon as you kicked the ball, the goalposts were dragged off the field. I think they’re on the back of a truck flying down the highway now.

LOL!

Roklan said:
Actually my typical knee-jerk reaction was right. We All Voted for our house. Republicans may rule it but their seats is our consensus. Which means “US.” And US, our house, the majority of them decided it was the wrong thing to do. Anymore questions oh mighty messiah of political questionnaires?

How about this one: When Bush was president, the Patriot Act was bad. Now that 0bama is president, why did all of your democrats vote for the bad Patriot Act??? Enlighten us.

ImNotBlue said:
Here’s something I don’t understand from the left… maybe you can answer it for me. When Olbermann made his infamous “Special Comment,” telling President Bush to “Shut the hell up,” he was praised for being so bold, so brash, so hardcore. However, when O’Reilly asks President Obama, how he deals with people hating him… he’s called unpatriotic and disrespectful. Exactly how does that work? What is the logic that says one is okay, the other isn’t, and somehow doesn’t conclude with, “We have a double standard”? PS-Badd… people weren’t considered “anti-American” because they disagreed with Bush. That’s a lie.

I don’t know how you can be so dumb- OBVIOUSLY the vaasst differences between all you cons’ examples of how Bush was treated and this HORRIBLE DISREPECTFUL O’Reilly interview are as follows:

Wasn’t the EXACT SAME WORDS
Wasn’t the EXACT SAME DAY or TIME
Wasn’t the EXACT SAME CHANNEL

Soooo, you should be able now to CLEARLY understand how pathetic your examples have been and how they IN NO WAY prove any of the liberals hypocrits!

/sarc

Roklan said:
Actually my typical knee-jerk reaction was right. We All Voted for our house. Republicans may rule it but their seats is our consensus. Which means “US.” And US, our house, the majority of them decided it was the wrong thing to do. Anymore questions oh mighty messiah of political questionnaires?

ndanielson said:
How about this one: When Bush was president, the Patriot Act was bad. Now that 0bama is president, why did all of your democrats vote for the bad Patriot Act??? Enlighten us.

Or this one: When Bush was president drone surveillance in Pakistan was invading a sovereign nation. Now that 0bama is president, killing Pakistani citizens with drone strikes are okay. Enlighten us.

ndanielson said:
Is there some liberal war crime link that you would recommend? Who makes up this definition of “war criminal?” Lefty clowns made up the definitions of torture, surely you have a favorite site for such things?. Having doctors stand by while 2 murderous thugs have water poured on their faces. Tell that to Daniel Pearl. Or John McCain, for that matter.

Why tell it to Mccain if it is an alright thing to do? If we torture POWS, shouldn’t they torture our solders too? Or does the exceptional-ism only apply when it comes to making sure the top 1% has less of tax burden when its time to clean the mess THEY MADE, or only when the middle class goes bankrupt when they get sick or just that the poor be blamed for their own problems and told to ignore the fact you have horrible education systems and Law enforcement that Targets you to keep their qoutas up?

Give me a break Fox-Parrot.

Achtung! The NEW POLITICAL ORDER IS HERE!

Anyone who criticizes TheOne, our beloved Messiah, OR ANY OF HIS ACTIONS, DECREES, POLICIES OR PALS will be condemned. They will be ostracized from society, they will be labeled a threat to national security, they will be attacked and smeared using MILLIONS from lunatic-left extremist soros, they will be called “unpatriotic”, “un-American”, “a terrorist”,”destructive” and “a racist”, they will have to actually pay taxes (unlike lunatic-left socialist tax-cheats rangel, geithner, caroline “you know” kennedy, olbermann, kerry, daschle, killifer, solis, kirk, sebelius and millions of others) and they will be vilified until they succumb to the ONLY ACCEPTABLE POLITICAL VIEW – that of the lunatic-left socialists.

All hail TheOne! Resistance is futile. —and this means you, FOX NEWS.

Roklan said:
Why tell it to Mccain if it is an alright thing to do? If we torture POWS, shouldn’t they torture our solders too? Or does the exceptional-ism only apply when it comes to making sure the top 1% has less of tax burden when its time to clean the mess THEY MADE, or only when the middle class goes bankrupt when they get sick or just that the poor be blamed for their own problems and told to ignore the fact you have horrible education systems and Law enforcement that Targets you to keep their qoutas up?

Give me a break Fox-Parrot.

Water boarding is torture because liberals proclaim it to be. Give me a break, American-bashing fool. Maiming, permanently disfiguring, starvation and murder used to be considered torture until liberals decided otherwise. Now, controlled conditions with medical staff made to make murderous animals uncomfortable is torture. Go hug a tree, sweetpea. A tree is much more intelligent than you, and twice as useful to humanity.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
There’s a difference between telling somebody something from far away and being face to face disrespectful to somebody. wouldn’t you agree?

Yes. Someone who can only throw bombs from a distance is (to a degree) cowardly. However, saying to someone’s face what they truly believe, is less so.

If somebody talks smack about you from afar you just brush it off but if somebody is up in your face you are bound to be more upset, no?

Of course, that’s not what happened in this instance. O’Reilly didn’t say, “I hate you,” he said that there are a number of people who hate you, how do you deal with that? It wasn’t an insult or an attack, it was essentially “how do you deal with your critics?”

I urge you to show me a video of somebody doing the same thing that O’Reilly and Baier did to President Obama to President Bush.

So we’re moving the goal posts? Now it’s not saying something “rude” to the President… it has to be face-to-face.

But you didn’t answer my question… why was Olbermann considered “brave” for saying that to Bush (from afar), but O’Reilly considered “un-American?”

And yeah, they kinda were. I take you to Sean Hannity saying Mr. Cohen “hated America”

Well, I’d like to see a quote please… but I stand by my, “No they weren’t.” People were not attacked simply because they disagreed with Bush… they were attacked because they put theory over practicality, or suggested that the government was in the business of killing its own citizens (see the Truthers), or used clearly false facts put forth by the enemy in an effort to attack the government. But they were not attacked simply because they disagreed with Bush. This is in stark contrast to those who disagree with Obama being called “racists.”

Roklan said:
Actually my typical knee-jerk reaction was right. We All Voted for our house. Republicans may rule it but their seats is our consensus. Which means “US.” And US, our house, the majority of them decided it was the wrong thing to do. Anymore questions oh mighty messiah of political questionnaires?

ndanielson said:
this

ndanielson said:

ndanielson said:
Or this one: When Bush was president, drone surveillance in Pakistan was considered invading a sovereign nation, by liberal clowns. Now that 0bama is president, killing Pakistani citizens with drone strikes are considered okay. How is that???Enlighten us.

How about this one: When Bush was president, the Patriot Act was bad. Now that 0bama is president, why did all of your democrats vote for the bad Patriot Act??? Enlighten us.

Still waiting. Is color be badd waiting too? We’re all waiting. Is 0bama a war criminal, now?

Maher dismisses Glenn Beck as a “bad joke” with a “messiah complex”? Beck!? Not his disappointing, underwhelming man-crush in the White House, that he’s apparently lost the affections of, thanks only to Tingles? Yeah Ok, Maher. And We’re the Teabaggers. Lol!

ndanielson said:
How about this one: When Bush was president, the Patriot Act was bad. Now that 0bama is president, why did all of your democrats vote for the bad Patriot Act??? Enlighten us.

Because the beehive had been hit with the bat. Osama did some terrorism, Bush saw the opportunity to get money and made sure all of the middle east hated us. (“We’ll never run out of enemies over there. There has to be at least 7000 Muslim countries… (Bush Geology) over there, and they all look alike with the turban things… (Why Saddam and Osama sometimes get’s mixed up) so lets stir it up. We will be wiping our bottoms with billions for at least the next ten years” says Bush.)

So we stomped on all minute peace talks and made sure the weapons industry would soar. Along comes President Obama into the only real Axis of Evil (previous White house), with nothing to gain by fighting but everything to lose by letting our legions of New enemies take revenge on America instead of the Bush family and friends (the real culprits). Congress decided we still need an upper-hand in communications.

I can sit here and teach you recent American history longer but I really have other things to do besides answering an information starved person who obviously lost all of his common sense when he was introduced to Highest rated news channel on prime-time and the other 20 hours of the day, seen in most countries in the world who claims they are “against” “MAINSTREAM MEDIA” lol

Roklan said:
Because the beehive had been hit with the bat. Osama did some terrorism, Bush saw the opportunity to get money and made sure all of the middle east hated us. (“We’ll never run out of enemies over there. There has to be at least 7000 Muslim countries… (Bush Geology) over there, and they all look alike with the turban things… (Why Saddam and Osama sometimes get’s mixed up) so lets stir it up. We will be wiping our bottoms with billions for at least the next ten years” says Bush.)

So we stomped on all minute peace talks and made sure the weapons industry would soar. Along comes President Obama into the only real Axis of Evil (previous White house), with nothing to gain by fighting but everything to lose by letting our legions of New enemies take revenge on America instead of the Bush family and friends (the real culprits). Congress decided we still need an upper-hand in communications.

I can sit here and teach you recent American history longer but I really have other things to do besides answering an information starved person who obviously lost all of his common sense when he was introduced to Highest rated news channel on prime-time and the other 20 hours of the day, seen in most countries in the world who claims they are “against” “MAINSTREAM MEDIA” lol

No where in your inane ramblings did you even come close to answering the question. In fact we are all dummer for reading it.. Wanna try again?

ndanielson said:
Or this one: When Bush was president drone surveillance in Pakistan was invading a sovereign nation. Now that 0bama is president, killing Pakistani citizens with drone strikes are okay. Enlighten us.

Orielly says that, not us.

Roklan said:
No, Obama is finishing a war that was started on lies. Fighting a war does not make you a war criminal. Bush started a war to make big bucks for his and his cronies companies. The country is in the tank but weapons and oil are doing 100s of times better than they were before the wars. That makes a war criminal. You should look it up one day

So according to your logic, I could walk into a bank while its being robbed and then assist the robber without breaking a law. I didn’t start the heist, so I didn’t break any laws.

I love simpleton logic

ndanielson said:
Water boarding is torture because liberals proclaim it to be. Give me a break, American-bashing fool. Maiming, permanently disfiguring, starvation and murder used to be considered torture until liberals decided otherwise. Now, controlled conditions with medical staff made to make murderous animals uncomfortable is torture. Go hug a tree, sweetpea. A tree is much more intelligent than you, and twice as useful to humanity.

Never heard of Evolution huh? probably a bible burning “christian”. This is called the Evolution of our Tolerances to torture.

ndanielson said:
Water boarding is torture because liberals proclaim it to be. Give me a break, American-bashing fool. Maiming, permanently disfiguring, starvation and murder used to be considered torture until liberals decided otherwise. Now, controlled conditions with medical staff made to make murderous animals uncomfortable is torture. Go hug a tree, sweetpea. A tree is much more intelligent than you, and twice as useful to humanity.

Finally, I got you to the point of name calling. (that usually happens around the same time you have no more argument cause glen beck didnt tell you how to use your own common sense. He only said “repeat after me.” And being that I took it to a place he hasnt discussed, you have no rebuttal. Sucks to be you. Goodbye now. I’m sure I could out-name call you but I’m sure I have better things to do with my time.

Roklan said:
Orielly says that, not us.

It is real easy to prove otherwise, even the leftist rag the NY times: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/28/world/asia/28drones.html?_r=1

Try again, sweetpea?

Your entire dem party was down with invading Afghanistan, how is it Bush’s war??? They are 0bama’s drone attacks, now aren’t they??? Wow you dodge, evade, attack, and raise moral equivalence arguments to an art form, and look so foolish and transparent doing it. Why?

Are you going to flee now to hug a lonely tree?

Roklan said:
Finally, I got you to the point of name calling. (that usually happens around the same time you have no more argument cause glen beck didnt tell you how to use your own common sense. He only said “repeat after me.” And being that I took it to a place he hasnt discussed, you have no rebuttal. Sucks to be you. Goodbye now. I’m sure I could out-name call you but I’m sure I have better things to do with my time.

I knew you would flee eventually. Is calling you coward name calling if it is true, sweetpea? Sweetpea is a term of endearment. Remember when the leftist darling, Joy Behar said bitch was a term of endearment? At least I didn’t feel the same as Joy about you…publicly, sweetpea. You seem like the type who would take offense.

Obeezy said:
No where in your inane ramblings did you even come close to answering the question. In fact we are all dummer for reading it.. Wanna try again?

to protect our President and country. Is the “talking points” short enough for you now, Dimwit?

Scott_in_MI said:
So according to your logic, I could walk into a bank while its being robbed and then assist the robber without breaking a law. I didn’t start the heist, so I didn’t break any laws.

I love simpleton logic

If you will ultimately be blamed for the Robbery, your mission should be to get out of their with as little casualties as possible. Your questions mysteriously missed the fact that you would be blamed, so I added it for you. Goodbye now, trailer-dweller.

Bill Maher is 100% correct. To get into the face of the President like he did and ask him once interrupt him and ask him again was totally disrespectful. Bill Maher doesn’t pull any punches.
And as far as Joe Scarborough on Joe and Friends,… I mean Morning Joe, to criticize Maher like he did was uncalled for. I would get off my death bed to see Scarborough go on Maher’s HBO Show. He would go thru Scarborough like crap thru a goose. Kuddos Bill!

Roklan said:
Never heard of Evolution huh? probably a bible burning “christian”. This is called the Evolution of our Tolerances to torture.

Just like gay marriage is your liberal evolution of marriage. And a living breathing document is your evolution of the US Constitution? You call so many things progress, including drone murder, from drone surveillance. As long as it’s liberal it is progress, huh?

Roklan said:
If you will ultimately be blamed for the Robbery, your mission should be to get out of their with as little casualties as possible. Your questions mysteriously missed the fact that you would be blamed, so I added it for you. Goodbye now, trailer-dweller.

Awwww, did sweetpea devolve into name calling???

When O’Reilly got into got into the President’s face about being hated, raising his voice and interrupting him and asking him again in that tone of was very unpatriotic. Obama just showed class as usual.

glenn113 said:
Bill Maher is 100% correct. To get into the face of the President like he did and ask him once interrupt him and ask him again was totally disrespectful. Bill Maher doesn’t pull any punches.
And as far as Joe Scarborough on Joe and Friends,… I mean Morning Joe, to criticize Maher like he did was uncalled for. I would get off my death bed to see Scarborough go on Maher’s HBO Show. He would go thru Scarborough like crap thru a goose. Kuddos Bill!

The constitutionally challenged 0bama deserves no respect for trashing the constitution. Two federal courts now hold his administration in contempt. Wake up.

ndanielson said:
I knew you would flee eventually. Is calling you coward name calling if it is true, sweetpea? Sweetpea is a term of endearment. Remember when the leftist darling, Joy Behar said bitch was a term of endearment? At least I didn’t feel the same as Joy about you…publicly, sweetpea. You seem like the type who would take offense.

Sadly you haven’t even noticed (or maybe you did) that you have did the ole Clannity trick of “attack the person, not the issue!” So predictable. and Sad.

ndanielson said:
Just like gay marriage is your liberal evolution of marriage. And a living breathing document is your evolution of the US Constitution? You call so many things progress, including drone murder, from drone surveillance. As long as it’s liberal it is progress, huh?

And you miss the “ole boys club” don’t you? Sorry, we moved on without you.

Roklan said:
to protect our President and country. Is the “talking points” short enough for you now, Dimwit?

Oh Sorry wrong again..the answer we were looking for was..We are Hyprocrits who have no values…… Yes thats is hypocrits no values..
Come back and play again though. Mr Maher

glenn113 said:
When O’Reilly got into got into the President’s face about being hated, raising his voice and interrupting him and asking him again in that tone of was very unpatriotic. Obama just showed class as usual.

So again, it’s because he talked to him in person.

You have no problem with (and this is just a historic example) of Olbermann telling Bush to “Shut the hell up,” on national television? That was acceptable speech because Bush was “so far away?”

Roklan said:
If you will ultimately be blamed for the Robbery, your mission should be to get out of their with as little casualties as possible. Your questions mysteriously missed the fact that you would be blamed, so I added it for you. Goodbye now, trailer-dweller.

Roklan said:
Finally, I got you to the point of name calling. (that usually happens around the same time you have no more argument cause glen beck didnt tell you how to use your own common sense. He only said “repeat after me.” And being that I took it to a place he hasnt discussed, you have no rebuttal. Sucks to be you. Goodbye now. I’m sure I could out-name call you but I’m sure I have better things to do with my time.

Wow. In the span of 5 minutes. Blinded by liberal-sheep ideology much?

sarainitaly said:
i would rather someone ask me direct questions/discuss things with me than hide and talk smack about me like cowards. The media was BRUTAL to Bush, ugly even at times. O’Reilly asked Obama a bunch of softball questions, laughed with him, and kept him from filibustering. He asked if it bothered him that people hated him. You think Obama didn’t know there were nutjobs out there that hated him?

Man up, man. O’Reilly wasn’t disrespectful or unpatriotic or whatever. He asked him questions.

I find that MUCH more respectful than sitting on a barely watched cable channel spouting out vitriol like “YOU SIR ARE A FASCIST!” and “You allowed 9/11 to occur”!

The same way the right and the right-wing media is to President Obama. Last i checked nobody was denying President Bush was even a citizen. If you honestly think your side is guilt-free in this then think again. There is a correct way to do things then there is the way that Fox has treated our PRESIDENT whenever he extends an olive branch. Obama does know, one of those nutjobs has a show on fox at 5 pm. Man up? Perhaps you should “woman up” and simply admit that Fox is disrespectful to the president. You can’t tell me that Baier was anything short of belligerent.
Yes because Fox spouts no vitriol. beck just calls the president a racist and a marxist. Hannity callls him the worst president ever and tells people that they’re anti-american. Having a smaller audience doesn’t equate to “barely watched” no matter how much you may want it to.

ndanielson said:
It is real easy to prove otherwise, even the leftist rag the NY times: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/28/world/asia/28drones.html?_r=1 Try again, sweetpea? Your entire dem party was down with invading Afghanistan, how is it Bush’s war??? They are 0bama’s drone attacks, now aren’t they??? Wow you dodge, evade, attack, and raise moral equivalence arguments to an art form, and look so foolish and transparent doing it. Why? Are you going to flee now to hug a lonely tree?

I am glad that Obama is using drones and more drones. It saves the lives of our kids. And the CIA is picking them off one by one. They only problem is if had Bush finished the job in Aghanistan and not gone into Iraq under the false pretenses, we probably would be there in the first place.

Obeezy said:
Oh Sorry wrong again..the answer we were looking for was..We are Hyprocrits who have no values…… Yes thats is hypocrits no values..
Come back and play again though. Mr Maher

lol for asking a question that I could only answer your way or I’d be wrong. That’s really tricky of you. I guess you also think the picture you have as a avatar is really funny huh? You sure are clever. I bet the light pole you have your computer plugged into outside of your trailer has clocked many watts of power to help you because the regular wise guy that you are. Good Job Chicken-little!

Roklan said:
And you miss the “ole boys club” don’t you? Sorry, we moved on without you.

Roklan said:
Sadly you haven’t even noticed (or maybe you did) that you have did the ole Clannity trick of “attack the person, not the issue!” So predictable. and Sad.

ndanielson said:
Just like gay marriage is your liberal evolution of marriage. And a living breathing document is your evolution of the US Constitution? You call so many things progress, including drone murder, from drone surveillance. As long as it’s liberal it is progress, huh?

Look, no attack of the person in my post of “liberal progress”. But…wait, look at your post! All in the span of 5 minutes, again. Are you stable at all?

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
The same way the right and the right-wing media is to President Obama. Last i checked nobody was denying President Bush was even a citizen. If you honestly think your side is guilt-free in this then think again. There is a correct way to do things then there is the way that Fox has treated our PRESIDENT whenever he extends an olive branch. Obama does know, one of those nutjobs has a show on fox at 5 pm. Man up? Perhaps you should “woman up” and simply admit that Fox is disrespectful to the president. You can’t tell me that Baier was anything short of belligerent.
Yes because Fox spouts no vitriol. beck just calls the president a racist and a marxist. Hannity callls him the worst president ever and tells people that they’re anti-american. Having a smaller audience doesn’t equate to “barely watched” no matter how much you may want it to.

Really? Thats your argument? Every president gets that treatment, Clinton got it, Hell for 8 years Bush got it. He had to do interview with networks that promoted his death ( Fat Michael Moores doc. who was on those very saw networks to promote that filth). Do you really feel that much love and loyalty to this president, that it offends you personally when he is challenged?

Roklan said:
to protect our President and country. Is the “talking points” short enough for you now, Dimwit?

Trailer dweller, and dimwit. Did you add those to your liberal terms of endearment??? I like Behars for you.

Roklan said:
lol for asking a question that I could only answer your way or I’d be wrong. That’s really tricky of you. I guess you also think the picture you have as a avatar is really funny huh? You sure are clever. I bet the light pole you have your computer plugged into outside of your trailer has clocked many watts of power to help you because the regular wise guy that you are. Good Job Chicken-little!

ANd i bet your 5″3 130 ilbs. Got beat up alot in school. Cried alot when someone hurt your feeling. Your jelous of anyone with knowledge or money. And you fight like a girl. Oh and you live upstairs in the room you grew up in.

Got that about right. Now let the adults play

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
The same way the right and the right-wing media is to President Obama. Last i checked nobody was denying President Bush was even a citizen. If you honestly think your side is guilt-free in this then think again. There is a correct way to do things then there is the way that Fox has treated our PRESIDENT whenever he extends an olive branch. Obama does know, one of those nutjobs has a show on fox at 5 pm. Man up? Perhaps you should “woman up” and simply admit that Fox is disrespectful to the president. You can’t tell me that Baier was anything short of belligerent.Yes because Fox spouts no vitriol. beck just calls the president a racist and a marxist. Hannity callls him the worst president ever and tells people that they’re anti-american. Having a smaller audience doesn’t equate to “barely watched” no matter how much you may want it to.

By your logic, Bush shouldn’t have done any interviews with NBC because of how MSNBC hosts acted… and probably should have ignored CBS because of Dan Rather.

Your outrage is very selective… but at least it’s obvious.

ImNotBlue said:
So again, it’s because he talked to him in person.

You have no problem with (and this is just a historic example) of Olbermann telling Bush to “Shut the hell up,” on national television? That was acceptable speech because Bush was “so far away?”

To be honest, you know that we all think its wrong to tell the President to shut the hell up. you Claim it was rejoiced that he said that and that’s a matter of opinion. He was not brave for doing that (if he actually did it. Ill have to check for myself because I know how lies can sometimes be the truth in a Conservative’s mind) but yes, if he did that, he was wrong too. Has your Fox- Strategy of “get them to admit something so I can claim I won, without touching the at-hand subject” quota been filled now?

Roklan said:
If you will ultimately be blamed for the Robbery, your mission should be to get out of their with as little casualties as possible. Your questions mysteriously missed the fact that you would be blamed, so I added it for you. Goodbye now, trailer-dweller.

Hey little fellow, I want to give you a little lesson. When there is a question, it’s usually follow by a funny looking symbol that looks like this: ? That’s called a question mark Skippy. Repeat after me: ques-tion mark. Good job…here’s your gold star. Show it to your Mom and tell her you tried learning on your own intead of swallowing anything/everything your fav websites propagandize you with.

Maher still passing cash to mediaite I see…

Roklan said:
To be honest, you know that we all think its wrong to tell the President to shut the hell up. you Claim it was rejoiced that he said that and that’s a matter of opinion. He was not brave for doing that (if he actually did it. Ill have to check for myself because I know how lies can sometimes be the truth in a Conservative’s mind) but yes, if he did that, he was wrong too. Has your Fox- Strategy of “get them to admit something so I can claim I won, without touching the at-hand subject” quota been filled now?

Chicken little, trailer dweller, dimwit. Did sweetpea lose the argument and resort to name calling?

One example:

“Mr. Bush was responding to Mr. Gregory’s question about anti-American demonstrations in Germany, Russia and France during the president’s visits to these nations since Wednesday.

“I wonder why it is you think there are such strong sentiments in Europe against you and against this administration?” the reporter said. “Why, particularly, there’s a view that you and your administration are trying to impose America’s will on the rest of the world, particularly when it comes to the Middle East and where the war on terrorism goes next?” Turning to Mr. Chirac, he added in French: “And, Mr. President, would you maybe comment on that?”

“Very good,” Mr. Bush said sardonically. “The guy memorizes four words, and he plays like he’s intercontinental.”

“I can go on,” Mr. Gregory offered. “I’m impressed – que bueno,” said Mr. Bush, using the Spanish phrase for “how wonderful.” He deadpanned: “Now I’m literate in two languages.”

Roars of laughter filled both the press conference room and a press filing center elsewhere in the city, where many members of the White House press corps were watching the exchange on live television. ”

http://www.rense.com/general25/mock.htm

ndanielson said:
Your entire dem party was down with invading Afghanistan, how is it Bush’s war???

In fact, there was only one person who voted against it: Barbara Lee.

ndanielson said:
Sheep have a limited range of emotions. Anger, rage, envy. They have so few tools to deal with them: dodge, deceit, lie, and flee.

Since we’re on a Bill Maher thread:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUPeGaj30Sw

Bill Maher’s the one who looks like he has fleas. I really don’t like that guy. I can tolerate the jokers like Olby, Maddow, and Matthews, but I really don’t like Maher.

“Obeezy says:
February 9, 2011 at 1:20 pm Obeezy(Quote)
3 0
Roklan said:
lol for asking a question that I could only answer your way or I’d be wrong. That’s really tricky of you. I guess you also think the picture you have as a avatar is really funny huh? You sure are clever. I bet the light pole you have your computer plugged into outside of your trailer has clocked many watts of power to help you because the regular wise guy that you are. Good Job Chicken-little!

ANd i bet your 5″3 130 ilbs. Got beat up alot in school. Cried alot when someone hurt your feeling. Your jelous of anyone with knowledge or money. And you fight like a girl. Oh and you live upstairs in the room you grew up in.

Got that about right. Now let the adults play”

Fight like a girl? You fight like a boy, a very ignorant, uneducated one. Learn how to spell better than a 6 year old, honeybunch.

ndanielson said:
Just like gay marriage is your liberal evolution of marriage. And a living breathing document is your evolution of the US Constitution? You call so many things progress, including drone murder, from drone surveillance. As long as it’s liberal it is progress, huh?

Resistance to progress is born of fear and ignorance. Without it we would still live in caves, and yet you think the Constitution was perfect in the 18th century, we should deny civil liberty to gays based on superstitious concepts of morality, and that torture (wherever you draw the line) is justified because our enemies do terrible things and we should sink to their level. Evolution, progress, whatever you want to call it is what lifts humanity up out of the mud, and I was raised to think we can always do better and to be very wary of those who decry progress on principle.

ImNotBlue said:
By your logic, Bush shouldn’t have done any interviews with NBC because of how MSNBC hosts acted… and probably should have ignored CBS because of Dan Rather.

Your outrage is very selective… but at least it’s obvious.

Now you’re doing an ad hominem. I’m not saying that. I’m saying there’s a way to be polite in your disagreement and confrontation while still showing respect for the president. Fox doesn’t seem to want to do that. It’s not just Beck; O’Reilly, his fill-in Laura Ingraham, Sarah Palin, all contributors/employees of Fox.
Now you’re just trying to insult with no basis.

Roklan said:
Finally, I got you to the point of name calling. (that usually happens around the same time you have no more argument cause glen beck didnt tell you how to use your own common sense. He only said “repeat after me.” And being that I took it to a place he hasnt discussed, you have no rebuttal. Sucks to be you. Goodbye now. I’m sure I could out-name call you but I’m sure I have better things to do with my time.

ndanielson said:
Look, no attack of the person in my post of “liberal progress”. But…wait, look at your post! All in the span of 5 minutes, again. Are you stable at all?

Dimwit, chicken little, and trailer dweller. Your own words must pi$$ you off more than anything, huh? It is a liberal thing.

Are you allowed to carry sharp objects?

adastra said:
Resistance to progress is born of fear and ignorance. Without it we would still live in caves, and yet you think the Constitution was perfect in the 18th century, we should deny civil liberty to gays based on superstitious concepts of morality, and that torture (wherever you draw the line) is justified because our enemies do terrible things and we should sink to their level. Evolution, progress, whatever you want to call it is what lifts humanity up out of the mud, and I was raised to think we can always do better and to be very wary of those who decry progress on principle.

There are provisions in the constitution, use them for your progress. That would be progress.

Roklan said:
And you miss the “ole boys club” don’t you? Sorry, we moved on without you.

If this were a boxing match, the ref would stop it. ndanielson is beating you like a step-child.

Obeezy said:
ANd i bet your 5″3 130 ilbs. Got beat up alot in school. Cried alot when someone hurt your feeling. Your jelous of anyone with knowledge or money. And you fight like a girl. Oh and you live upstairs in the room you grew up in.

Got that about right. Now let the adults play

You are no adult. Adults wouldn’t use the picture you have. To say that about my weight must mean you are one of those Fat blowhards that is the real burden on America’s Healthcare. I guarantee that I would beat you in a fist,knife,gun,spitting fight, debate, spelling test, IQ test, Fico score, Bank account comparison or shooting target can off of the fence outside of your trailer. The Adults were talking so go fly a kite, Cramden .

david r said:
If this were a boxing match, the ref would stop it. ndanielson is beating you like a step-child.

I have four step children whom I have never beaten. Except when they needed it. That only made them excellent at chess, scrabble, math and science. Now they beat me.

UNreasonable lib says:

I’m saying there’s a way to be polite in your disagreement and confrontation while still showing respect for the president.

Does telling President Bush to shut the hell up constitute showing respect?

I just think it is too funny that the only topic that any other news organization talks about it FNC and Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck, or Sarah Palin. Too damn funny. NBC and Matt lauer ask the First Lady about O’Reilly, Maher gets on MSNBC and smashes FNC and Bill O’Reilly – reapeat, repeat, repeat, and then write it up here on mediaite.

Honestly, think out of the box, find some new toipcs to report on her. FNC bashing has gone over the top, beyond the pale, it is boring as all get out. stop repeating the loony lefts attacks on the center, please.

Scott_in_MI said:
Hey little fellow, I want to give you a little lesson. When there is a question, it’s usually follow by a funny looking symbol that looks like this: ? That’s called a question mark Skippy. Repeat after me: ques-tion mark. Good job…here’s your gold star. Show it to your Mom and tell her you tried learning on your own intead of swallowing anything/everything your fav websites propagandize you with.

“intead??????” Is that how I use question marks?

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
Now you’re doing an ad hominem. I’m not saying that. I’m saying there’s a way to be polite in your disagreement and confrontation while still showing respect for the president. Fox doesn’t seem to want to do that. It’s not just Beck; O’Reilly, his fill-in Laura Ingraham, Sarah Palin, all contributors/employees of Fox.
Now you’re just trying to insult with no basis.

0bama will never have the respect of most America loving individuals. He burned that bridge when he fully disregarded the very document he swore to uphold. Talk to someone who cares about “respecting” 0bama. Wake up.

Roklan said:
“intead??????” Is that how I use question marks?

Down to attacking the form of the message now? Keep going, sweetpea.

ImNotBlue said:
Here’s something I don’t understand from the left… maybe you can answer it for me.

When Olbermann made his infamous “Special Comment,” telling President Bush to “Shut the hell up,” he was praised for being so bold, so brash, so hardcore. However, when O’Reilly asks President Obama, how he deals with people hating him… he’s called unpatriotic and disrespectful.

Exactly how does that work? What is the logic that says one is okay, the other isn’t, and somehow doesn’t conclude with, “We have a double standard”?

PS-
Badd… people weren’t considered “anti-American” because they disagreed with Bush. That’s a lie.

Olbermann didn’t say it to Bush’s face. Non controversy.

Roklan said:
You are no adult. Adults wouldn’t use the picture you have. To say that about my weight must mean you are one of those Fat blowhards that is the real burden on America’s Healthcare. I guarantee that I would beat you in a fist,knife,gun,spitting fight, debate, spelling test, IQ test, Fico score, Bank account comparison or shooting target can off of the fence outside of your trailer. The Adults were talking so go fly a kite, Cramden .

Guarantee it huh. Best think about that son. Whats the matter, you call me names and dont like it when i retaliate? HAHA . How about you come on down and see about who tough. Usually when people spout about how tough and smart they are, well lets say i was right about my assessment of you.. Your a punk who hides behind a computer to act tough..Your a punk and all youll ever be is a punk..

Scott_in_MI said:
Weren’t you the same person who was critical of lefties being “akin to being a traitor if you ever were critical of the Bush adminstrations policy.”?

Not only are you a lefty puppet, but you’re also a hypocrite

I dont even know what you mean idiot.

Biscuit said:
“Obeezy says:
February 9, 2011 at 1:20 pm Obeezy(Quote)
3 0
Roklan said:
lol for asking a question that I could only answer your way or I’d be wrong. That’s really tricky of you. I guess you also think the picture you have as a avatar is really funny huh? You sure are clever. I bet the light pole you have your computer plugged into outside of your trailer has clocked many watts of power to help you because the regular wise guy that you are. Good Job Chicken-little!

ANd i bet your 5″3 130 ilbs. Got beat up alot in school. Cried alot when someone hurt your feeling. Your jelous of anyone with knowledge or money. And you fight like a girl. Oh and you live upstairs in the room you grew up in.

Got that about right. Now let the adults play”

Fight like a girl? You fight like a boy, a very ignorant, uneducated one. Learn how to spell better than a 6 year old, honeybunch.

Take it easy honey or youll blow a vein.. Now fug off

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
UNreasonable lib says:

I’m saying there’s a way to be polite in your disagreement and confrontation while still showing respect for the president.

Does telling President Bush to shut the hell up constitute showing respect?

You’ve been following nothing. Let me go back over it. I stated that there is a difference between saying something from afar and being blatantly disrespectful to a person’s face. Each time that President Obama has extended an olive branch to Fox they have spat in his face figuratively. That is drastically different from what Keith Olbermann does. Ifv somebody disses you from afar they’re just a pu**y but if somebody gets in your face they evidently think you won’t lay them out. Is any of this getting through? That being said, no, Keith O was out of line too. Is Glenn Beck out of line for calling the president a racist and saying his plans are reparations?

Scott_in_MI said:
Looks like Color Me Badd went running away with his/her tail between the legs…facts always crush emotion

I didn’t run anywhere I actually have a life, I dont sit in front of Mediaite all day like your unemployed ass.

ndanielson said:
0bama will never have the respect of most America loving individuals. He burned that bridge when he fully disregarded the very document he swore to uphold. Talk to someone who cares about “respecting” 0bama. Wake up.

I’m assuming you haven’t got this yet being that you’re notsosmart, but I ignore you when you go into idiot troll mode.

Just because Obama spent twenty years in a church where the pastor was a racist, Beck made the leap that Obama might be too.

Grammie said:
One example:

“Mr. Bush was responding to Mr. Gregory’s question about anti-American demonstrations in Germany, Russia and France during the president’s visits to these nations since Wednesday.

“I wonder why it is you think there are such strong sentiments in Europe against you and against this administration?” the reporter said. “Why, particularly, there’s a view that you and your administration are trying to impose America’s will on the rest of the world, particularly when it comes to the Middle East and where the war on terrorism goes next?” Turning to Mr. Chirac, he added in French: “And, Mr. President, would you maybe comment on that?”

“Very good,” Mr. Bush said sardonically. “The guy memorizes four words, and he plays like he’s intercontinental.”

“I can go on,” Mr. Gregory offered. “I’m impressed – que bueno,” said Mr. Bush, using the Spanish phrase for “how wonderful.” He deadpanned: “Now I’m literate in two languages.”

Roars of laughter filled both the press conference room and a press filing center elsewhere in the city, where many members of the White House press corps were watching the exchange on live television. ”

http://www.rense.com/general25/mock.htm

Thanks for sharing that great moment in American gouvernance and comedy with us, Janet.

david r said:
If this were a boxing match, the ref would stop it. ndanielson is beating you like a step-child.

H/She called me sweetpea and asked more questions. You sure know a good fight when you see one. Thanks for your clueless input. Be sure to watch a cockfight in Taiwan, your brain should explode.

Yes, Janet. That post was very infourouroroureerrourmative.

Roklan said:
You are no adult. Adults wouldn’t use the picture you have. To say that about my weight must mean you are one of those Fat blowhards that is the real burden on America’s Healthcare. I guarantee that I would beat you in a fist,knife,gun,spitting fight, debate, spelling test, IQ test, Fico score, Bank account comparison or shooting target can off of the fence outside of your trailer. The Adults were talking so go fly a kite, Cramden .

Now she proclaims who is and isn’t and adult. Wow. Liberals have the market on marriage, torture, just and unjust wars, what is and isn’t constitutional, what is racist, bigoted, discrimination, fair wages, rich, poor, enough money for schools, how we should eat, what we should eat, where to smoke, what light bulbs to buy, who is taxed enough, who isn’t. Is there anything liberals shouldn’t decide, sweetpea?

Gee, not only does David gregory ask GWB about his popularity being lower than Nixon but argues over the answer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntR9aTVVCOo&feature=related

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
I’m assuming you haven’t got this yet being that you’re notsosmart, but I ignore you when you go into idiot troll mode.

He is currently held in contempt of court over drilling in LA, and over 0bamacare, in FL. That is some pretty serious offense to the rule of law under the Constitution. His disregard of federal rulings is unconstitutional, period. Wake up.

ndanielson said:
He is currently held in contempt of court over drilling in LA, and over 0bamacare, in FL. That is some pretty serious offense to the rule of law under the Constitution. His disregard of federal rulings is unconstitutional, period. Wake up.

I love it when you people pull out the Constitution. According to the Constitution KSM is to be tried in New York. Please tell me about the opposition to that.

ndanielson said:
Now she proclaims who is and isn’t and adult. Wow. Liberals have the market on marriage, torture, just and unjust wars, what is and isn’t constitutional, what is racist, bigoted, discrimination, fair wages, rich, poor, enough money for schools, how we should eat, what we should eat, where to smoke, what light bulbs to buy, who is taxed enough, who isn’t. Is there anything liberals shouldn’t decide, sweetpea?

They shouldn’t let you anywhere near your fat, poor, uneducated, and ready to be manipulated step-children. Unfortunately, you are obviously home all day with pent up republican vices (usually random shootings, pain killers and Meth, closeted homosexual urges and a thing for child porn) which allows you to be on the net all day. So No! Until they get your kind off of the streets, the government should control EVERYTHING

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
I’m assuming you haven’t got this yet being that you’re notsosmart, but I ignore you when you go into idiot troll mode.

By the way that was a good way to show you ignore me. Why not IgnorantLib? At least that is no oxymoron like ReasonableLib. It is a little redundant, though. Is that why?

Grammie said:
Gee, not only does David gregory ask GWB about his popularity being lower than Nixon but argues over the answer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntR9aTVVCOo&feature=related

Yet he does not interrupt him or get belligerent. compare that with this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sv7q_E84LB0&feature=related

Roklan said:
They shouldn’t let you anywhere near your fat, poor, uneducated, and ready to be manipulated step-children. Unfortunately, you are obviously home all day with pent up republican vices (usually random shootings, pain killers and Meth, closeted homosexual urges and a thing for child porn) which allows you to be on the net all day. So No! Until they get your kind off of the streets, the government should control EVERYTHING

And now she resorts to projection. Do you ever give up, sweetpea? My kids are grown and successful. In fact many of them are protecting your right to remain so ignorant. Are you going to impugn them some more? They graduated with honors from schools that wouldn’t even touch you.

ndanielson said:
By the way that was a good way to show you ignore me. Why not IgnorantLib? At least that is no oxymoron like ReasonableLib. It is a little redundant, though. Is that why?

And now you’ve gone back into Idiotic Troll mode. Good day sir.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
I love it when you people pull out the Constitution. According to the Constitution KSM is to be tried in New York. Please tell me about the opposition to that.

He is an unlawful combatant. He should have received a military tribunal and executed long ago. To keep that animal caged up should be considered torture and stopped immediately. Ask roklan.

KSM trial would be a circus, and was dreamed up by the woefully incompetent Eric Holder to further harm America.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
And now you’ve gone back into Idiotic Troll mode. Good day sir.

Back to ignoring me? If this is your way of ignoring me, wouldn’t IgnorantLib fit you better than ReasonableLib? Just pointing out the obvious. Good day to you, too, sir?

infourouroroureerrourmative.

Oops. Left out a couple of the letters.

ndanielson said:
He is an unlawful combatant. He should have received a military tribunal and executed long ago. To keep that animal caged up should be considered torture and stopped immediately. Ask roklan.

KSM trial would be a circus, and was dreamed up by the woefully incompetent Eric Holder to further harm America.

What does THE CONSTITUTION say about it?

For the record, ndanielson, you post something intelligent then I will respond, but when you troll I won’t.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
What does THE CONSTITUTION say about it?

I’d be more interested in what the Hague conference had to say about it, as he was caught on enemy soil while killing and plotting to kill Americans. Since when do we confer constitutional rights on foreigners in foreign war zones???

You looked a lot smarter when you were ignoring me, you know?

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
Yet he does not interrupt him or get belligerent. compare that with this:

.
Neither did BOR get belligerent with BHO.

Yes, he did interrupt him, but not unreasonably so, in my opinion. The interruption served the laudable purpose of breaking the train of the prepared talking point, that ALL politicians do, and actually getting an original answer.

So, the same question with an argument over the answer does not show disrespect to the then president but BOR did.

I don’t agree with you.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
For the record, ndanielson, you post something intelligent then I will respond, but when you troll I won’t.

On your list of liberal things that liberals define, I will add troll for you. You are a site pest just like your other sheep followers who show up here. You are kinda fun, though.

ndanielson said:
I’d be more interested in what the Hague conference had to say about it, as he was caught on enemy soil while killing and plotting to kill Americans. Since when do we confer constitutional rights on foreigners in foreign war zones???

You looked a lot smarter when you were ignoring me, you know?

That’s the thing it wasn’t in a foreign war zone. According to the Constitution you must be tried in the area where the crime for which you are being tried took place, period. It doesn’t matter where you’re caught. If you forge checks in Iowa but get caught in Nevada you’re going to be tried in Iowa. That’s how it works.

ndanielson said:
The_Reasonable_Lib said:
For the record, ndanielson, you post something intelligent then I will respond, but when you troll I won’t.

So your turn: since when do we confer constitutional rights on illegal combatants caught on enemy soil in a war zone, again?

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was captured in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, on March 1, 2003, by the Pakistani ISI, possibly in a joint action with agents of the American Diplomatic Security Service, and has been in U.S. custody since that time. In September 2006, the U.S. government announced it had moved Mohammed from a secret prison to the facility at the Guantanamo…

When Bin Laden and his goons from Al Quaada crossed into Pakistan, it became a war zone. Just ask 0bama. Last I saw unmanned drone attacks were still alive and well in PAKISTAN. KSM was a named, and wanted illegal combatant. Wake up.

Grammie said:
.
Neither did BOR get belligerent with BHO.

Yes, he did interrupt him, but not unreasonably so, in my opinion. The interruption served the laudable purpose of breaking the train of the prepared talking point, that ALL politicians do, and actually getting an original answer.

So, the same question with an argument over the answer does not show disrespect to the then president but BOR did.

I don’t agree with you.

I’m not just arguing about O’Reilly, but also Baier. And yes, there was a completely different tone in the interviews. Gregory never got loud or belligerent with the president as the others did. How do you even know it was a talking point? Every response to a question does not equate to a talking point.

As I said, there is a polite way to do things, you can be dissenting without being belligerent. I feel that Gregory was very polite in his disagreement. On the other hand look at O’Reilly’s “confrontation”.

I could say the same.

Re the “hate” question: Didn’t O’Reilly ask Bush the same question? E.g., “Why do people hate you and your Presidency?”

I think it’s perhaps a “iffy” question but not completely out of bounds. Why do we hate our Presidents so much over the past 20-25 or so years? Sure, there’s always been opposition and all Presidents have been vilified by the other side. Jefferson, Lincoln, FDR, Grant, Reagan, Clinton and on and on…. But it seems so much intense in modern times.

Perhaps O’Reilly should had expanded the question to include previous presidents as well as his own?

Again, I think there were better questions to ask but it’s certainly not a inappropriate one.

If anybody didn’t already know (and how could they not) Maher is an asshat and his studio audience a bunch of trained liberal seals. They’re all quite happy together in their ignorance.

ndanielson said:
So your turn: since when do we confer constitutional rights on illegal combatants caught on enemy soil in a war zone, again?

Probably since the 14th amendment gave them protection. He was CAUGHT in a war zone, but must be tried in the area where the crime was committed according to the Constitution which is THE LAW. The Bush administration followed this example when they tried the 20th hijacker Zacarias Moussaoui

Maher becomes a liberal hero every time he speaks to power, ie., Fox News. It does not matter what he says or how flimsy his argument, the sheep will then have a reason to spout their Fox hatred and cry wolf at how bad 0bama has it from the “media”. And BO was spot on that: THEIR media does adore him so, Norbit.

Isn’t it interesting that 0bama chose Fox News in the first place? Has any liberal sheep here reconciled that bit of mysterious 0bama maneuvering? Could it have to do with 0bama’s endorsement of Al Jazeera as a “legitimate” news source??? Hmmmm.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
Probably since the 14th amendment gave them protection. He was CAUGHT in a war zone, but must be tried in the area where the crime was committed according to the Constitution which is THE LAW. The Bush administration followed this example when they tried the 20th hijacker Zacarias Moussaoui

The crime he was committing in Pakistan, and Afghanistan was killing and plotting to kill Americans. End of story. Bush followed pressure from the leftist clowns in this country, which is one reason Bush gets no pass from many on the right. Wake up.

ndanielson said:
The crime he was committing in Pakistan, and Afghanistan was killing and plotting to kill Americans. End of story. Bush followed pressure from the leftist clowns in this country, which is one reason Bush gets no pass from many on the right. Wake up.

Furthermore, Bush brought him here to interrogate him, NOT bring him to trial. He was also brought to foreign soil. If you didn’t know Guantanamo is on FOREIGN SOIL. He is not due any constitutional rights. Get your head out and wake up.

And Bill O’Reilly who claims he’s such a patriot – how unpatriotic it is in my view to treat a President that way.

Maher actually said that with a straight face?

What you have here with O’Donnell and Maher is simply two sphincter muscles flexing.

Roklan said:
I can sit here and teach you recent American history longer but I need to get my head out of my ass.

There fixed it for you.

ndanielson said:
The_Reasonable_Lib

ReformedLib should be your goal. Being liberal is easy. Being conservative takes brains.

Bill Maher is a comedian who some people find occasionally funny. Any claims or comments as a self-appointed and self-important psuedo-intellectual or political pundit should righfully be ignored.

Next!

gordonbloyershow said:
Matt is a lib. He sees nothing libs do.

Compared to these new republican(tea-party) Reagan would be seen as a RINO.

ChickaBOOMer: O’Donnell, Maher Cross Wind
http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2011/02/msnbc-s-lawrence-odonnell-continues-his.html

Would Bill O’Reilly have been so disrespectful to a white president, irrespective of the party or politics of the president? We all know the answer is no!

Yoda002 said:
Compared to these new republican(tea-party) Reagan would be seen as a RINO.

Wow what a liberal talking point. Did you come up with that by yourself? And offer up some examples. There must be so many, from policy and speech archives. Hurry back with some.

armwood said:
Would Bill O’Reilly have been so disrespectful to a white president, irrespective of the party or politics of the president? We all know the answer is no!

Of course not armwood, you know that BO is racist.! Good that you brought such fresh perspective to the table. I am shocked that you would cry racist.

Here’s one for the teabaggers: http://blogs.trb.com/news/opinion/chanlowe/blog/2011/02/chan_lowe_egypt_and_the_tea_pa.html

ndanielson said:
ReformedLib should be your goal. Being liberal is easy. Being conservative takes brains.

Here you go Mr. Conservative: http://blogs.trb.com/news/opinion/chanlowe/blog/2011/02/chan_lowe_egypt_and_the_tea_pa.html

i love it …….Bill Mahr..keep on aggravating the GOP PUBES

armwood said:
Would Bill O’Reilly have been so disrespectful to a white president, irrespective of the party or politics of the president? We all know the answer is no!

RRKING , yoo hoo ! ARMANDO !!!
That ‘s My Little Army !!
It ‘s me , Garth ! ( R.Royal King ) .

Bill Maher and Lawrence O’ Donnell…need I say more! These two IDIOTS combined couldn’t lay a glove on Bill. Both of these two Morons combined do NOT come close to Bill’s daily ratings/viewers. It is so funny watching the pathetic, extreme, wimpy, sissified girlieboy, wacko left wingers gang up on a man on the right and lose! So pathetic, yet so funny!!!

Aleman said:
i love it …….Bill Mahr..keep on aggravating the GOP PUBES

Bill Maher is the best!. And he says it like it is.

Sure does.

If anybody didn’t already know (and how could they not) Maher is an asshat and his studio audience a bunch of trained liberal seals. They’re all quite happy together in their ignorance.

……………………………………

If anybody didn’t already know (and how could they not) “Beck” is an asshat and his studio audience a bunch of trained “conservatives seals”. They’re all quite happy together in their ignorance.

Maher is a little whiny conformist bitch. But we all already knew that, he is a far leftist after all which makes him a whiny conformist bitch by definition.

The president works for us, not the other way around. O’Reilly — anybody, in fact — can talk to the president however they see fit.

http://www.therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=6227

WildMan said:
Bill Maher and Lawrence O’ Donnell…need I say more! These two IDIOTS combined couldn’t lay a glove on Bill. Both of these two Morons combined do NOT come close to Bill’s daily ratings/viewers. It is so funny watching the pathetic, extreme, wimpy, sissified girlieboy, wacko left wingers gang up on a man on the right and lose! So pathetic, yet so funny!!!

If these two are idiots,why are they on national TV and you are like most right wing nuts are calling them names?????

It’s convenient for Bill Mahar to use Limbaugh, but he said Rush didn’t care that reporters were being attacked. Rush said he didn’t care that they were being DETAINED, not attacked. Nobody takes civility training form Mahar seriously.

WildMan said:
Bill Maher and Lawrence O’ Donnell…need I say more! These two IDIOTS combined couldn’t lay a glove on Bill. Both of these two Morons combined do NOT come close to Bill’s daily ratings/viewers. It is so funny watching the pathetic, extreme, wimpy, sissified girlieboy, wacko left wingers gang up on a man on the right and lose! So pathetic, yet so funny!!!

We all know where to find the largest concentration of morons when Bill O’Reilly is on. FNC. Congratulations.

Tony Westover said:
Maher is a little whiny conformist bitch. But we all already knew that, he is a far leftist after all which makes him a whiny conformist bitch by definition.

The president works for us, not the other way around. O’Reilly — anybody, in fact — can talk to the president however they see fit.

Man up bitches! Between the crying and whining of Beck and Boehner, the Republicans and their moronic ilk need to STFU. How about that?!

ndanielson said:
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was captured in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, on March 1, 2003, by the Pakistani ISI, possibly in a joint action with agents of the American Diplomatic Security Service, and has been in U.S. custody since that time. In September 2006, the U.S. government announced it had moved Mohammed from a secret prison to the facility at the Guantanamo…

When Bin Laden and his goons from Al Quaada crossed into Pakistan, it became a war zone. Just ask 0bama. Last I saw unmanned drone attacks were still alive and well in PAKISTAN. KSM was a named, and wanted illegal combatant. Wake up.

I’m pretty sure Bush had no interest in Bin Laden – he said so himself. The lies to invade Iraq was Bush’s way of helping out his Corporate Masters protect the oil lines: You know, Saudi Royal Family (Fox), Haliburton (Cheney), Koch Industries, et. al. He went against the wisdom of education and history at the cost of over 6,000 US service men and women, hundreds of thousands more injured and maimed, over 1,000,000 Iraqi civilians killed in collateral damage and hundreds of thousands more injured and maimed, Haliburton has our military watching over their no bid contracts in Iraq, BlackWater was given $15 Billion in US $100 bills “lost” in the Iraq desert (and the GOP laughed) – we’re not there for any other reason. Period.

CLASSIC MAHER.

HILARIOUS

Facebook User said:
Maher is a little whiny conformist bitch. But we all already knew that, he is a far leftist after all which makes him a whiny conformist bitch by definition.

ha ha ha yea right bill is a far leftist.,.maybe moderate on a good day