Our personal toilet and friends disagree.

Yakity -yak .

Robert The RealRoyalKing ® explains : My fans often enquire about my speciaoul friend BFD . They ask ” How did you two awful creatoures meet ?” It was fate ! One moonlit night whilst I was making my rounds of the best dumpstours in Austin , I spotted this guy going through my favourite one behind the doughnut shop . He was barefoot , wearing torn overalls and a purple shower cap . I decided to help this miserable creature and showed him how to brush the insects off the half-eaten doughnuts before eating them . He flashed that sly three -toothed grin at me and I was hooked ! More later on how I got him deloused ( 3 times) and cleaned up and gave him a job in my salon . Toodles ! ©

The Lantern of Truth said:
Yakity -yak .

Robert The RealRoyalKing ® explains : My fans often enquire about my speciaoul friend BFD . They ask ” How did you two awful creatoures meet ?” It was fate ! One moonlit night whilst I was making my rounds of the best dumpstours in Austin , I spotted this guy going through my favourite one behind the doughnut shop . He was barefoot , wearing torn overalls and a purple shower cap . I decided to help this miserable creature and showed him how to brush the insects off the half-eaten doughnuts before eating them . He flashed that sly three -toothed grin at me and I was hooked ! More later on how I got him deloused ( 3 times) and cleaned up and gave him a job in my salon . Toodles ! ©

Johnny Dollar is calling “Yes-Im-Right”, and you know what he wants.

King, could you see about getting George a new toupee?

Good article with substantive stuff about possible nominees.

RealRoyalKing , sheepishly . My toupee guy , Pedro, no longer speaks to me . Took BFD in for a fitting , so he could ditch the shower cap . Pedro got his hands too close to BFD ‘s mouth and got bitten . After taking Pedro in for tetanus injections and a series fof rabies shots , he refuses to deal with me .
Maybe George could just try a shower cap .

If this were business-as-usual for the GOP, I’d have to agree with Will. But it appears there are many on the right who are vociferously opposed to Daniels and Pawlenty because they lack charisma and/or what they see as allowing the “GOP establishment” to choose the candidate.

And I recall your failed experiment when you hired Pro Obama Agenda to do the black hairstyles. But you couldn’t keep him from attacking the white customers. You know how he hates racism.

George Will will damn sure not be the decider of who is and who is not a serious contender for consideration by the ” real ” American people to go up against Barack Obama next November……..That’s just plain silly talk.

George the only thing named Daniels that can beat Barry is Jack Daniels- hands down.While Romney still has to explain Mass Obamacare, I think he is still the one the others have to beat.

I LIKE NEITHER!!…..GOD I hope the LSM dosen’t pick our candidate AGAIN.

notsofast said:
George the only thing named Daniels that can beat Barry is Jack Daniels- hands down.While Romney still has to explain Mass Obamacare, I think he is still the one the others have to beat.

He tried to explain and he failed. Now pick another candidate idiot.

It’s interesting – and revealing – to contrast this take-down of Gingrich by Will versus the one offered by Bill Maher.

Here we have a reasoned, cogent, substantive – and far more devastating – takedown of Gingrich than the one by Maher. Not even close.

Yes, but Maher is a simple comedian and Will is a veteran pundit. Okay. Let’s just remember to keep those descriptions handy by our desks at all time. Especially when Maher is on CNN or MSNBC opining about public policy matters.

G Will loves Daniels…

T/Paw & Cain 2012…

Those honky customers should know better than to make eye contact with POB .

Fortunately, Will and his his good old boy ilk are a dying breed. Guys like Will brought us Dole, Bush, and McCain.

Barack Must Go said:
George Will will damn sure not be the decider of who is and who is not a serious contender for consideration by the ” real ” American people to go up against Barack Obama next November……..That’s just plain silly talk.

Yea. …But I hate to bring the name Palin or Bachmann in………….But they COULD/WOULD win.

Oh my gosh. Paul G opening Pandora’s box again. Brace yourselves.

skoorbekim said:
G Will loves Daniels…

T/Paw & Cain 2012…

I like Cain…..and it would drive the libturds crazy.
2 black guys. HA!

Christine should fold her tent and slink away . Far away .

Why Don’t We Hear About Soros’ Ties to Over 30 Major News Organizations ?

”
When liberal investor George Soros gave $1.8 million to National Public Radio , it became part of the firestorm of controversy that jeopardized NPR’s federal funding. But that gift only hints at the widespread influence the controversial billionaire has on the mainstream media. Soros, who spent $27 million trying to defeat President Bush in 2004, has ties to more than 30 mainstream news outlets – including The New York Times, Washington Post, the Associated Press, NBC and ABC.

Prominent journalists like ABC’s Christiane Amanpour and former Washington Post editor and now Vice President Len Downie serve on boards of operations that take Soros cash. This despite the Society of Professional Journalists’ ethical code stating: “avoid all conflicts real or perceived.”

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/05/11/dont-hear-george-soros-ties-30-major-news-organizations/?test=faces

writer said:
Oh my gosh. Paul G opening Pandora’s box again. Brace yourselves.

Don’t you sleep?

I can’t sleep. I’m too worried about Palin.

Fokker News said:
He tried to explain and he failed. Now pick another candidate idiot.

Suck a big nut, you scumbag , smegma eating lib!

Sorry, Barry will no longer pack your “prison wallet” you lib POS!

Fokker News said:
Fokker News says:
May 15, 2011 at 12:29 pm Fokker News(Quote)

Oh, and Fokker, practice safe sex and go Fok yourself, son!

LOL

Paul G said:
I like Cain…..and it would drive the libturds crazy.2 black guys. HA!

B Maher is already positioning Cain as Republican racist-guilt of some sort…

I’ve always said that it will come down to:

Palin
Cain
Ryan
Daniels
Pawlenty

And Trump…should he run as a Democrat. :)

I also like Buddy. Saw him on Fox today. Not gonna win, but he’s a good guy.

Paul G said:
Yea. …But I hate to bring the name Palin or Bachmann in………….But they COULD/WOULD win.

For the past three months all I’ve heard is ‘ No Conservatives Are Willing To Go Up Against Obama,,,, TOO AFRAID ‘.

Now as soon as they announce the same Sunday morning douchebags are writing them off before things even get started.

Us ” real ” Americans ( conservatives/Republicans ) will decide who our candidate will be when we kick Barack & Michelle Obama to the curb next November, not a bunch of left wing bomb throwers and George Will.

Judge Mental said:
If this were business-as-usual for the GOP, I’d have to agree with Will. But it appears there are many on the right who are vociferously opposed to Daniels and Pawlenty because they lack charisma and/or what they see as allowing the “GOP establishment” to choose the candidate.

Daniels used to be the OMB Director under Bush. He’s going to have his own skeletons. Daniels doesn’t have the kind of numbers for boots on the ground that other candidates would bring. It’s as simple as that.

writer said:
I can’t sleep. I’m too worried about Palin.

I wouldn’t/couldn’t sleep either if I were you. Palin/Bachmann..Cain/Palin……
But I bet the LSM will try to find Cains 2nd grade bully……
But they still haven’t found Oidiots half bro in a hut.

notsofast said:
George the only thing named Daniels that can beat Barry is Jack Daniels- hands down.While Romney still has to explain Mass Obamacare, I think he is still the one the others have to beat.

I think the unspoken person is Palin. I think they all have to demonstrate how different they are from Palin. How is a Mitt Romney going to walk into Colorado or Missouri and come off folksy. That’s just part of the ticket.

Wouldn’t it be epic if it were a Daniels-Palin or Mitt-Palin ticket? That would send the universe into a tailspin, but it would excite the base and it would put CA and MA into play. Granted, it’s a “bad” move, but if Mitt wants to be backed up by someone, it’s going to have to be a Palin-type else I don’t see him coming out of this.

Barack Must Go said:
For the past three months all I’ve heard is ‘ No Conservatives Are Willing To Go Up Against Obama,,,, TOO AFRAID ‘.

Now as soon as they announce the same Sunday morning douchebags are writing them off before things even get started.

Us ” real ” Americans ( conservatives/Republicans ) will decide who our candidate will be when we kick Barack & Michelle Obama to the curb next November, not a bunch of left wing bomb throwers and George Will.

Yep…and at least Huckabee isn’t running….thank God.

Me thinks you’re missing the point.

Paul G said:
I wouldn’t/couldn’t sleep either if I were you. Palin/Bachmann..Cain/Palin……
But I bet the LSM will try to find Cains 2nd grade bully……
But they still haven’t found Oidiots half bro in a hut.

Palin/West or Palin/Giuliani would be epic.

writer said:
Me thinks you’re missing the point.

Whomever the R candidate is, they should hire you – unless you have skeletons in your closet. :)

Paul, from all my posts, you missed that I’m a right winger and was being sarcastic? Damn. I’ve got to start trying harder.

writer said:
Paul, from all my posts, you missed that I’m a right winger and was being sarcastic? Damn. I’ve got to start trying harder.

If I were Dan Abrams, I’d be sending Palin a Thank You card –

gretawire Greta Van Susteren
by SarahPalinUSA
This is so “un-Dan Abrams” I think ….: There is much criticism of the news business and I know why… http://fxn.ws/mu8iC6
14 hours ago

“Not to a frisk start”

gNOpigs, last presidential election you got stuck with Mc5th Choice and Moose Boogers.

Then you threw a tantrum and got teabagged by the same DC gNOpigs.

You morons DO NOT HAVE A CHANCE!

WCinWI said:
I think the unspoken person is Palin. I think they all have to demonstrate how different they are from Palin. How is a Mitt Romney going to walk into Colorado or Missouri and come off folksy. That’s just part of the ticket.

Wouldn’t it be epic if it were a Daniels-Palin or Mitt-Palin ticket? That would send the universe into a tailspin, but it would excite the base and it would put CA and MA into play. Granted, it’s a “bad” move, but if Mitt wants to be backed up by someone, it’s going to have to be a Palin-type else I don’t see him coming out of this.

No. I’m not a Daniels guy…OR a Christie guy. If Cain ran before Oidiot…he’d be a winner….now the ‘moderates(libturds) have had their fill.

WCinWI said:
Palin/West or Palin/Giuliani would be epic.

Ya know West is VERY good guy…just as Cain.

Skippy said:
“Not to a frisk start”

gNOpigs, last presidential election you got stuck with Mc5th Choice and Moose Boogers.

Then you threw a tantrum and got teabagged by the same DC gNOpigs.

You morons DO NOT HAVE A CHANCE!

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MORON!!!

writer said:
Paul, from all my posts, you missed that I’m a right winger and was being sarcastic? Damn. I’ve got to start trying harder.

Ummmm…no.

See, I actually like Palin. And I expected the mention of her name to start the lefties frothing. Frankly, I’m a little disappointed.

Paul G said:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MORON!!!

YES!

DO NOT REPLY TO THE MORON PAUL G!

Paul G said:
No. I’m not a Daniels guy…OR a Christie guy. If Cain ran before Oidiot…he’d be a winner….now the ‘moderates(libturds) have had their fill.

Ya know West is VERY good guy…just as Cain.

Yeah – I’m flexible. I support Palin the most, but I’m flexible. I’ll vote regardless, but only people like Ryan, West, Cain or Palin can sincerely get me to get off my feet and make calls. At least I’d put in massive hours with those candidates. I’d perhaps begrudgingly do the same for Daniels or Pawlenty but there’s no “it” factor to them.

I’m personally a social conservative, but globally a libertarian (I can understand the libertarian bent on gay issues even if I don’t completely accept it personally myself – it’s a growing issue for me that I’ve changed to over time) and a fiscal con. I’m also against the liberal media press and I want someone that would take it to them.

Like I said, I welcome folks to have such a hatred for Cain, West or Palin. It’ll make it all the more beautiful when she/them start to change the minds of the growing Libertarian/Independent bent in the US. Even if they lose, I’d rather fight with them as candidates. Let’s see how Obama operates without a teleprompter.

WCinWI said:
I’ve always said that it will come down to:

Palin
Cain
Ryan
Daniels
Pawlenty

And Trump…should he run as a Democrat. :)

I also like Buddy. Saw him on Fox today. Not gonna win, but he’s a good guy.

And your ignorant fanatical take on this is wrong again. So go ahead and call me a racist or some other nonsense word like that if you are still in reality denying mode.

writer said:
See, I actually like Palin. And I expected the mention of her name to start the lefties frothing. Frankly, I’m a little disappointed.

Unlike you, George Will actually has brains just a bit bigger than your peanuts.

writer said:
See, I actually like Palin. And I expected the mention of her name to start the lefties frothing. Frankly, I’m a little disappointed.

Haha for the longest time, I just thought you were a comedian that did this for giggles. Then occasionally you’ll insert yourself into the politics and I just crack up because it reminds me that the R side (or Independents that lean R) are just the funniest people. You tend to get vulgarity and rude names when you deal with those on the Left. But if you go to HotAir, you get loads of laughs and one-liners. Makes me smile for our side. :)

Ouch.

Skippy said:
You morons DO NOT HAVE A CHANCE!

You sound like a junior high school cheerleader. And maybe you missed what happened last November, when Americans rejected progressivism, big time.

I am no Will fan but at least he operates from a rational intelligent mindset, so rare amongst conservatives these days. For every one WF Buckley, there are 10 Becks, 20 Limbos & 30 Savages. Even Pat Buchanan makes more sense than the average teabagger here.

jakester said:
And your ignorant fanatical take on this is wrong again. So go ahead and call me a racist or some other nonsense word like that if you are still in reality denying mode.

It’s time for the US to nominate a Libertarian Female to the Presidency. Deal with it!

If I say such wrong things, then don’t respond. You don’t operate on logic.

WCinWI said:
Yeah – I’m flexible. I support Palin the most, but I’m flexible. I’ll vote regardless,

Party over county and principles be damned.

Nice!

WC, that ouch was for Skippy. He wounded me deeply.

jakester said:
I am no Will fan but at least he operates from a rational intelligent mindset, so rare amongst conservatives these days. For every one WF Buckley, there are 10 Becks, 20 Limbos & 30 Savages. Even Pat Buchanan makes more sense than the average teabagger here.

Get jiggy with it

writer said:
WC, that ouch was for Skippy. He wounded me deeply.

Perhaps if he dislikes the R party so much, he could move to Aussie – the land of the didgeridoo.

Skippy said:
Party over county and principles be damned.

Nice!

I am in the ABO group. :)

winning said:
You sound like a junior high school cheerleader. And maybe you missed what happened last November, when Americans rejected progressivism, big time.

Tell us again what you teabagged idiots promised to accomplish and what you have done so far.

I’ll tell you what – NOTHING -

Go gNOpigs!

Paul G said:
I like Cain…..and it would drive the libturds crazy.
2 black guys. HA!

Two token fools who speak in the dumbed down teabagginese dialect the simple minds here crave! Neither have any chance at all. But go ahead and keep playing your fantasy politics game.

WCinWI said:
I am in the ABO group. :)

So you’d vote for a moose turd like Palin as long as someone attaches an (R) next to it.

Gotcha.

WCinWI said:
Palin/West or Palin/Giuliani would be epic.

West, who does not live in his own district? Who holds a town hall meeting outside his own district and only takes questions in writing? REALLY?!?

Why, that’d be as dumb as voting for someone just because their name had a (D) next to it. Who’d do such a thing?

Guys (and gals?), just a suggestion: The teabagging jokes and references are getting old. Try another line. It’s sort of an equivalent from the other side to the use of the “libtard” line. No one takes seriously any posts from people who use such junior high school lunchroom language.

As I said, just a suggestion. You can take it or leave it.

SteveMG said:
Guys (and gals?), just a suggestion: The teabagging jokes and references are getting old. Try another line. It’s sort of an equivalent from the other side to the use of the “libtard” line. No one takes seriously any posts from people who use such junior high school lunchroom language.

As I said, just a suggestion. You can take it or leave it.

So you are leaving?

jakester said:
Two token fools who speak in the dumbed down teabagginese dialect the simple minds here crave! Neither have any chance at all. But go ahead and keep playing your fantasy politics game.

You are now officially a racist. Congrats!!!

I will be waiting for BFD to add you to the list.

Skippy said:
So you’d vote for a moose turd like Palin as long as someone attaches an (R) next to it.

Gotcha.

Palin is a libertarian. I am libertarian-minded. Simple as that. Enjoy 2012. :)

writer said:
Why, that’d be as dumb as voting for someone just because their name had a (D) next to it. Who’d do such a thing?

I don’t know why you don’t have the guts to call the toilet in wi for what she is.

Lets see you grow a pair.

jim bronson 990cc said:
West, who does not live in his own district? Who holds a town hall meeting outside his own district and only takes questions in writing? REALLY?!?

Link? Paul Ryan gives town halls all over. Deal with it.

Skippy said:
I don’t know why you don’t have the guts to call the toilet in wi for what she is.

Lets see you grow a pair.

Stop making fun of my boyfriend Writer.

Calling someone a toilet takes guts? Could I get a medal of honor for it?

Skippy said:
So you are leaving?

No, just ignoring the substance of the posts from folks who use the language. Libtards, teabaggers, et cetera. It’s silly.

Get the idea? If you want to try and persuade folks and you use the language, it’s not working. If you just want to spit at them, feel free to do so but that won’t work either.

IOW, you’re hurting your own cause.

As I said, you can take it or ignore it.

WCinWI said:
Palin is a libertarian. I am libertarian-minded. Simple as that. Enjoy 2012. :)

So that is what they are calling it these days to avoid the public indignation.

You are saying Ron Paul is quite old and unattractive but he still can gather a following if you put enough pigstick on him.

With Bovine here under his new name, ignoring it is an excellent idea. Break time.

Skippy said:
So that is what they are calling it these days to avoid the public indignation.

You are saying Ron Paul is quite old and unattractive but he still can gather a following if you put enough pigstick on him.

Ron Paul is a truther. And his supporters dislike if not hate Jews. I distrust RP because of his supporters alone.

I prefer commonsense Libertarianism. Obama is now a neocon. Palin is not. Enjoy. :)

WCinWI said:
Stop making fun of my boyfriend Writer.

Are you sure po’ boy WHITER will be accepted by Ma and Paw?

Skippy said:
So that is what they are calling it these days to avoid the public indignation.

You are saying Ron Paul is quite old and unattractive but he still can gather a following if you put enough pigstick on him.

Besides, I think Palin has faced enough public scrutiny. Perhaps you would like to ask the press why so many females don’t get involved in running for political office? Perhaps, because you need a set of balls to deal with the misogynistic and sexist tendencies that breed in liberal households. Which is quite odd – you’d like the feminist branch would want more females doing more things period. Thankfully, Palin has made it possible to be both feminist and gorgeous all in one. And at the same time, to be successful at it. Look at how she lives rent free in your mind. It’s glorious to show such rage.

Skippy said:
Are you sure po’ boy WHITER will be accepted by Ma and Paw?

I wouldn’t make fun of such a yummy food. :) Po Boys are quite delicious. I wait for the time when I can have one from down South. :) Now, since you’ve just proven yourself to be a bigot, do you have anything else to say?

WCinWI said:
Ron Paul is a truther. And his supporters dislike if not hate Jews. I distrust RP because of his supporters alone.

I prefer commonsense Libertarianism. Obama is now a neocon. Palin is not. Enjoy. :)

Liberfarians are the veggies in the pork based gNOpig diet. The gNOpigs know they need them, but they can’t bring themselves to a helping. And the veggies can’t thrive without the gNOpig manure.

A perfect closed ecosystem.

WCinWI said:
Besides, I think Palin has faced enough public scrutiny. Perhaps you would like to ask the press why so many females don’t get involved in running for political office? Perhaps, because you need a set of balls to deal with the misogynistic and sexist tendencies that breed in liberal households. Which is quite odd – you’d like the feminist branch would want more females doing more things period. Thankfully, Palin has made it possible to be both feminist and gorgeous all in one. And at the same time, to be successful at it. Look at how she lives rent free in your mind. It’s glorious to show such rage.

You are correct.

Moose Boogers has faced sooooo much public scrutiny she didn’t make it into George Will’s list.

It is as simple as that. Sara Palin is an idiot.

Fokker News said:
He tried to explain and he failed. Now pick another candidate idiot.

Awfully hateful today…

WCinWI said:
Yeah – I’m flexible. I support Palin the most, but I’m flexible. I’ll vote regardless, but only people like Ryan, West, Cain or Palin can sincerely get me to get off my feet and make calls. At least I’d put in massive hours with those candidates. I’d perhaps begrudgingly do the same for Daniels or Pawlenty but there’s no “it” factor to them.

I’m personally a social conservative, but globally a libertarian (I can understand the libertarian bent on gay issues even if I don’t completely accept it personally myself – it’s a growing issue for me that I’ve changed to over time) and a fiscal con. I’m also against the liberal media press and I want someone that would take it to them.

Like I said, I welcome folks to have such a hatred for Cain, West or Palin. It’ll make it all the more beautiful when she/them start to change the minds of the growing Libertarian/Independent bent in the US. Even if they lose, I’d rather fight with them as candidates. Let’s see how Obama operates without a teleprompter.

Yep. Exactly.

SteveMG said:
Guys (and gals?), just a suggestion: The teabagging jokes and references are getting old. Try another line. It’s sort of an equivalent from the other side to the use of the “libtard” line. No one takes seriously any posts from people who use such junior high school lunchroom language.

As I said, just a suggestion. You can take it or leave it.

The word is “libturd”….Just saying. HA!…….You are a newbie here…but your now gonna have to change your name. But there might be hope for you. We’ll see.

WCinWI said:
I wouldn’t make fun of such a yummy food. :) Po Boys are quite delicious. I wait for the time when I can have one from down South. :) Now, since you’ve just proven yourself to be a bigot, do you have anything else to say?

I am sure po’ boys – white bread sandwich with an eclectic mixture of ingredients for filling – are quite popular in WI.

But I am not sure about you. Since you carry inside all that bitterness.

for sale high quality n i k e shoes and other sporting goods.

FREE SHIPPING AND PAYPAL ACCEPT

best running shoes

http://zapposer.com

&%$#@

Paul G said:
Yea. …But I hate to bring the name Palin or Bachmann in………….But they COULD/WOULD win.

I suspect Bachmann intends to run, and Palin does not.

I am not surprised that George Will disparages Ron Paul as a candidate, but at least a little surprised that he writes off Mitt Romney so early in the process. Romney has a lot of money, and the ability to raise more.

I read that a Mitch Daniels/Condi Rice ticket has been thrown around as an idea. I like Condi Rice but apparently she is pro-abortion so that’s a strike against her.

Paul G said:
The word is “libturd”….Just saying. HA!…….You are a newbie here…but your now gonna have to change your name. But there might be hope for you. We’ll see.

Well, I haven’t been 12 years old for about 30 years now excuse me if I can’t get the lingo down just right.

WCinWI said:
Ron Paul is a truther. And his supporters dislike if not hate Jews. I distrust RP because of his supporters alone.

I prefer commonsense Libertarianism. Obama is now a neocon. Palin is not. Enjoy. :)

Ronald Reagan was once asked about the unsavory views of some of his supporters. I cannot find the quote or even paraphrase it very accurately; but in essence he said something about them agreeing with him, not him agreeing with them.

Ron Paul cannot stop genuine lunatics from voicing support for him; but no matter how many of them there are, that does not mean that he is in full or even partial agreement with them.

I respect George Will a lot, and quite frankly I believe he’s a reservoir of eloquence and a fountain of intellectualism. BUT, I find it rather unusual and perhaps amusing, that he somehow feels Ron Paul is not even worthy to be considered a formidable candidate for the 2012 race.

George Will might playing to the “establishment” base, but I can guarantee that they’ll all be shocked to see who eventually emerges victorious in the Presidential elections.

Speaking for myself, if I had to vote with my conscience I’ll vote for Ron Paul. No other candidate for President, or member of both houses of congress understands and respects the US Constitution half as much as Ron Paul does. He’s views have been consistent over the decades, and at least no one can argue that America would have been much better off, had the United States been governed within the confines of the Constitution, and according to the true intent of the Founding Fathers. America began the journey towards the wrong path roughly a century ago, during the boom of the progressive movement in the early 1900′s; and since then the Government seems to drift father away from the Constitution with each Executive administration and Congress, irrespective of the political party. Ronald Reagan rolled back the tide significantly, and Americans once again understood what the phrases “Liberty” and “Freedom” meant.

The good things Ron Paul can and will do to fix the corrupt and highly-secretive system, out weighs the few imperfections that he would have as a human being. If Chris Christie does not run, I cannot point out any candidate that is running for that office with the true intentions of operating a Constitutional government and fixing the broken system.

LOGICandREASON said:
I respect George Will a lot, and quite frankly I believe he’s a reservoir of eloquence and a fountain of intellectualism. BUT, I find it rather unusual and perhaps amusing, that he somehow feels Ron Paul is not even worthy to be considered a formidable candidate for the 2012 race.

George Will might playing to the “establishment” base, but I can guarantee that they’ll all be shocked to see who eventually emerges victorious in the Presidential elections.

Speaking for myself, if I had to vote with my conscience I’ll vote for Ron Paul. No other candidate for President, or member of both houses of congress understands and respects the US Constitution half as much as Ron Paul does. He’s views have been consistent over the decades, and at least no one can argue that America would have been much better off, had the United States been governed within the confines of the Constitution, and according to the true intent of the Founding Fathers. America began the journey towards the wrong path roughly a century ago, during the boom of the progressive movement in the early 1900’s; and since then the Government seems to drift father away from the Constitution with each Executive administration and Congress, irrespective of the political party. Ronald Reagan rolled back the tide significantly, and Americans once again understood what the phrases “Liberty” and “Freedom” meant.

The good things Ron Paul can and will do to fix the corrupt and highly-secretive system, out weighs the few imperfections that he would have as a human being. If Chris Christie does not run, I cannot point out any candidate that is running for that office with the true intentions of operating a Constitutional government and fixing the broken system.

I also respect Krauthammer…but sometimes he’s wrong.

Pawlenty + Bachmann = THE WINNING TEAM for America !!!!!!!!!!!!!

SteveMG said:
Well, I haven’t been 12 years old for about 30 years now excuse me if I can’t get the lingo down just right.

Ok…..you have proven you’re a moron. Good luck here. Change your name for sure now. Just sayin. Ha!

My dream Tickets in order of preference

Ron Paul – Chris Christie
Ron Paul – Paul Ryan
Ron Paul – Tim Pawlenty
Ron Paul – Michele Bachmann

Every other Republican candidate is just the same old RINO/Establishment puppet

TeaPartyPatriot said:
Pawlenty + Bachmann = THE WINNING TEAM for America !!!!!!!!!!!!!

TPP…Tell me why I should be for Pawlenty? I like him….but??

George Will is so deep into the establishment he couldn’t find his way out with a GPS.

Gary Johnson is the best candidate for anyone who wants the government out of their lives. Will wants to control the aspects of our lives he considers the province of the government, which is most of them. He just doesn’t want to pay for the privilege.

LOGICandREASON said:
I respect George Will a lot, and quite frankly I believe he’s a reservoir of eloquence and a fountain of intellectualism. BUT, I find it rather unusual and perhaps amusing, that he somehow feels Ron Paul is not even worthy to be considered a formidable candidate for the 2012 race.

George Will might playing to the “establishment” base, but I can guarantee that they’ll all be shocked to see who eventually emerges victorious in the Presidential elections.

Speaking for myself, if I had to vote with my conscience I’ll vote for Ron Paul. No other candidate for President, or member of both houses of congress understands and respects the US Constitution half as much as Ron Paul does. He’s views have been consistent over the decades, and at least no one can argue that America would have been much better off, had the United States been governed within the confines of the Constitution, and according to the true intent of the Founding Fathers. America began the journey towards the wrong path roughly a century ago, during the boom of the progressive movement in the early 1900’s; and since then the Government seems to drift father away from the Constitution with each Executive administration and Congress, irrespective of the political party. Ronald Reagan rolled back the tide significantly, and Americans once again understood what the phrases “Liberty” and “Freedom” meant.

The good things Ron Paul can and will do to fix the corrupt and highly-secretive system, out weighs the few imperfections that he would have as a human being. If Chris Christie does not run, I cannot point out any candidate that is running for that office with the true intentions of operating a Constitutional government and fixing the broken system.

Perhaps George Will’s assessment of Ron Paul’s chances came about after he heard Ron Paul say that he essentially supported segregation and thought government should not be able to step in and tell business owners that they can’t discriminate.

“Perhaps George Will’s assessment of Ron Paul’s chances came about after he heard Ron Paul say that he essentially supported segregation”

I’m no Paul supporter but he has repeatedly condemned Jim Crow segregation and stated that it was illegal. Segregation in the South was mandated by law. Paul has, to my knowledge, always stated that those laws were un-constitutional and that segregation of public facilities was wrong and improper.

He does have the view that property rights give an individual the right to deny access to them for whatever reason. That is, if someone doesn’t want to sell a used car to a black person or white person they have that right. It’s their property.

I think that’s a naive view but it’s certainly not one that “supports segregation.” It’s an absolutist view of property rights that has shown to be unworkable.

J Baustian said:
I like Condi Rice but apparently she is pro-abortion so that’s a strike against her.

Nobody’s pro abortion, idiot.

Snidely said:
Gary Johnson is the best candidate for anyone who wants the government out of their lives. Will wants to control the aspects of our lives he considers the province of the government, which is most of them. He just doesn’t want to pay for the privilege.

Precisely. It amuses me when I listen to the faux conservative “liberty” charlatans talking about how they want their freedom. These people just want to use the government to advance their agenda. They are the same people passing abortion laws such as requiring mandatory ultrasounds and DoMA. Like some lady representative said, they want to make government small enough to fit in your bedroom. This is not libertarianism. Libertarians need to be careful of these hacks hijacking their movement.

AHHH HELLOOO..THERE ARE NO SERIOUS CANDIDATES IN THE GOP……PERIOD………..PAYLIN-TRUMP-BOZO THE CLOWN…BACHMAN ..( NOTICE I PUT BOZO AHEAD OF BACHMAN

“This is not libertarianism. Libertarians need to be careful of these hacks hijacking their movement.”

George Will has never described himself as a libertarian. He’s not hijacking a movement that he doesn’t belong to.

And I’ll note that the leader of the libertarians – Ron Paul – is himself pro-life or anti-abortion rights.

If any “bedroom monitor” is trying to hijack the libertarians, it’ll be Mr. Paul and not George Will.

Gasket said:
Nobody’s pro abortion, idiot. .

bullshit, is that how you see it and justify it?

J Baustian said:
Ronald Reagan was once asked about the unsavory views of some of his supporters. I cannot find the quote or even paraphrase it very accurately; but in essence he said something about them agreeing with him, not him agreeing with them.

Ron Paul cannot stop genuine lunatics from voicing support for him; but no matter how many of them there are, that does not mean that he is in full or even partial agreement with them.

You don’t know enough about Ron’s supporters. That’s not even including the liberals. They are some of the most vile people. You appear to not know about the R candidates so that’s ok.

Romney is out.
Ron Paul is out.
Gingrich is out.
Huckabee is out.

Paul G said:
I also respect Krauthammer…but sometimes he’s wrong.

As is Ron Paul. :)

WCinWI said:
Link? Paul Ryan gives town halls all over. Deal with it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_West_(politician)
Does Ryan give town hall meetings in the district he lives instead of the one he represents?

TeaPartyPatriot said:
Pawlenty + Bachmann = THE WINNING TEAM for America !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Except, of course, they are from the same state and can’t run on the same ticket. Remember when we had that faux vice president selection for W, and Big Dick flew off to Wyoming to register to vote there (he was then registered in Texas, although he seldom voted in any elections). Once the faux Wyoming rsidence was established, then W and Big Dick could run together.

Paul/Trumpt 2012!

jim bronson 990cc said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_West_(politician)
Does Ryan give town hall meetings in the district he lives instead of the one he represents?

Yes. HAHAHAHAHA

I think George Will is right on the money in this case. Now, as a rule, I don’t subscribe to conspiracy theories. I just don’t think people have the time to be in a convoluted conspiracy. However, if the Republicans put someone like Newt on the ticket, I would really have to wonder if they really want the White House. I might even be tempted to think that the Republican elites would rather have Obama in the White House so that if something really horendous happens like, say, the U.S. defaults on its debt, or the dollar stops being the world reserve currency, they could then put the blaim on the Democrats. I don’t know, I think I had too much coffee…

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Except, of course, they are from the same state and can’t run on the same ticket. Remember when we had that faux vice president selection for W, and Big Dick flew off to Wyoming to register to vote there (he was then registered in Texas, although he seldom voted in any elections). Once the faux Wyoming rsidence was established, then W and Big Dick could run together.

Paul/Trumpt 2012!

Don’t bother the right with rules. They think rules are only for their opponents.
Remember when they pushed the XXII Amendment, because they hated Roosevelt?
Remember when they wanted to change it, so Ronnie could run again?
Remember when they wanted to change Article II, Sect. I, so that Schwartznegger could run for Pres?
Then they tried to say Obama was foreign born.
The right doesn’t run on rules, it runs on hatreds.

It’s going to come down to a 3 man race:

Mitt Romney
Ron Paul
Rick Perry

Daniels and Pawlenty are not serious candidates that are far too liberal (Mitt Romney takes the liberal Republican vote anyway). I really do see Rick Perry or Ron Paul as having the best chance.

This is looking like a very light turnout night for the 2012 election. The way things are going there is no one for us Independents to vote for. Right now I’m leaning towards either Mickey or Minnie Mouse. Both have a lot more going for them than OBUMmer or any of the seriously flawed Republicans.

Damn, is Mighty Mouse still alive?

I like how the media always tries to pick who is good enough and divvies up the coverage respectively.

It is truly disgusting and not what a free press was meant to be.

You know i respect you righties and I am interested in who is going to run against Obama, but when you guys say rick perry or ron paul? Are you serious. As far as I know Rick Perry aint running. And it will be a cold day in hell before the republicans nominated Ron Paul. Cant you see that. The mainstream republican party has nothing in common with Ron Pauls views. I think some of you guys really should form a third party cause the GOP doesn’t represent you, if Ron Paul is who you listen to. Don’t get me wrong i find him very refreshing in that he says what he thinks and not what people(mainstream republicans) want to hear. He’s like the Dennis Kuchinich of the right, its nice to listen to him but he will never get elected for president.

Nobody wants to run against the black guy. You have to tiptoe around like you’re walking on hot coals lest they be offended and label you a racist for life. Most guys will pass in 2012.

Newsflash!

George Will’s Predictions are weak to say the least.

Conservative Pundits are trying to force Pawlenty and Daniels down our throats and it aint going to work…. I consider Newt to be a serious candidate (every bit as much as either of the two that he ordained) and I see Romney as the best option… Mandate and all…. Heaven forbid a Republican Governor partner with a Conservative consulting group (Heritage Foundation) in a Liberal State and become “Reformists” who come up with a method to get Healthcare users to pay for their own medical services…. If that is not a Consevative M.O. then I don’t know what is….. And what’s more is Romney can and will beat Obama…. they are nearly neck and neck in early polling and once the dollar takes its dive (which is coming soon) Obama will suffer big time.

George Will is probably a pretty decent fellow but he–like Dr. Krauthammer, and some others–is fatally flawed when “prescribing” whom should win the Republican nomination. Folks like him are immersed in the northeastern Republican notion that only a member of the establishment should be given his party’s nomination. This is a part of the problem with the Republican party–lack of new blood which brings new ideas. The fact is, the old line Republicans, e.g. Will, have contributed or caused just about as many of our problems as have the Democrats.

As a conservative yearning for my country to return to governance by the Constitution, I am tired of marking my ballot for the old line thinkers. (Please note I did NOT say voting “for” the old line Republicans! Ronald Reagan is the last Republican I voted “for;” in the other elections, I have merely voted “against” the Democrat.) When the establishment realizes this, they might wake up. If they do not, the Republican Party will go the way of the Whigs. Hell, maybe that wouldn’t be so bad after all.

I don’t think its that bad X-3 hell im a lib but i know as well as anybody the good times don’t last long. Is Obama looking unbeatable as we speak? Sure but that doesn’t mean anything. If this economy doesn’t turn around and the unemployment rate isn’t down to at least 7% by next year and gas prices stay high, I think the right republican can beat him. By right I think someone like Romney can take him, it will be tough but he could pull it off. The thing is the right needs to get behind their candidate and not pick at each other like scabs. Course I don’t think a Romney admin would look any different than an Obama one but thats just me. And the gas thing aint Obamas fault just like it wasn’t Bushs fault but the public needs someone to blame. The only thing other than the healthcare that is gonna hurt romney is the mormon thing. Even though to me its no big deal( cause i think all religion is ridiculous) The evangelicals don’t like Mormons and he needs those freaks on his side:)

Paul G said:
I like Cain…..and it would drive the libturds crazy.
2 black guys. HA!

I don’t think that I have seen one Cain “supporter” here that hasn’t brought up his race at some point.

ModerateMan said:
It’s going to come down to a 3 man race:

Mitt Romney
Ron Paul
Rick Perry

Daniels and Pawlenty are not serious candidates that are far too liberal (Mitt Romney takes the liberal Republican vote anyway). I really do see Rick Perry or Ron Paul as having the best chance.

I would vote for Ron Paul over Obama.

Maybe you would Nacho and and thats cool but the GOP will never support Paul so I don’t think you will have to worry about voting for him

I disagree with both Matt Schneider (who is obviously a fan of Newt) and George Will (who seems to ignore the polling data).

It’s early yet and obviously things could change (especially after a few debates in the fall), but right now a Romney/Pawlenty ticket looks the most likely.

After the GOP race has a few primaries under its belt, party leaders (especially the Tea Party conservatives) will have to begrudgingly come to terms with how much better Romney is polling with independent voters than any other GOP contender.

WCinWI said:
Yes. HAHAHAHAHA

Ryan doesn’t live in the district he represents? Breaking news from Coen!

ModerateMan said:
It’s going to come down to a 3 man race: Mitt RomneyRon PaulRick Perry Daniels and Pawlenty are not serious candidates that are far too liberal (Mitt Romney takes the liberal Republican vote anyway). I really do see Rick Perry or Ron Paul as having the best chance.

And here I thought Rick Perry was going to have Texas cecede?

ModerateMan said:
It’s going to come down to a 3 man race:

Mitt Romney
Ron Paul
Rick Perry

A cultic waffler, a cafeteria Libertarian and a “man” who ran Texas, Texas of all places, into a US $24 – 37 Billion debt! Great choices one an all.

jim bronson 990cc said:
And here I thought Rick Perry was going to have Texas cecede?

With the debt Tollbooth has created, Texas can’t afford to secede anymore. We need the full faith and credit of the US government.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:

With the debt Tollbooth has created, Texas can’t afford to secede anymore. We need the full faith and credit of the US government.

I would not dismiss Ron Paul so easily. I am SUUUUUURE he has a plan to repay TX’s debt with GOLD!

for sale high quality n i k e shoes and other sporting goods.

FREE SHIPPING AND PAYPAL ACCEPT

best running shoes

http://zapposer.com

&%$#@

Gingrich knows he does not get the republicans on the right, other than his own faithful, so he plans to move toward the center and see if there are some moderates who could get behind, say, an announced Pres/VP ticket of Newt and Rudy.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
A cultic waffler, a cafeteria Libertarian and a “man” who ran Texas, Texas of all places, into a US $24 – 37 Billion debt! Great choices one an all. With the debt Tollbooth has created, Texas can’t afford to secede anymore. We need the full faith and credit of the US government.

Texas can’t run a debt. It’s against the Texas constitution. You’ve been reading too much Paul Krugman propaganda. Texas will balance its budget again like it has since its inception.

WCinWI said:
J Baustian said:
Ronald Reagan was once asked about the unsavory views of some of his supporters. I cannot find the quote or even paraphrase it very accurately; but in essence he said something about them agreeing with him, not him agreeing with them.
Ron Paul cannot stop genuine lunatics from voicing support for him; but no matter how many of them there are, that does not mean that he is in full or even partial agreement with them. (end of quote)

You don’t know enough about Ron’s supporters. That’s not even including the liberals. They are some of the most vile people. You appear to not know about the R candidates so that’s ok.

Some of Ron Paul’s supporters are a nasty bunch. But that does not mean he is one of them.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
TeaPartyPatriot said:
Pawlenty + Bachmann = THE WINNING TEAM for America !!!!!!!!!!!!! (end of quote)

Except, of course, they are from the same state and can’t run on the same ticket.

Two persons from the same state can run on the same ticket.

However, the presidential electors from their state cannot vote for both of them. So if a Pawlenty-Bachmann ticket carried Minnesota, the Republican electors from Minnesota could vote for Pawlenty for president, but they’d have to vote for someone else for vice-president.

In a tight race, this could mean the House of Representatives would have to decide who will be vice-president.

But the electors in all other states could vote for both.

insideguy said:
I don’t think its that bad X-3 hell im a lib but i know as well as anybody the good times don’t last long. Is Obama looking unbeatable as we speak? Sure but that doesn’t mean anything. If this economy doesn’t turn around and the unemployment rate isn’t down to at least 7% by next year and gas prices stay high, I think the right republican can beat him. By right I think someone like Romney can take him, it will be tough but he could pull it off. The thing is the right needs to get behind their candidate and not pick at each other like scabs. Course I don’t think a Romney admin would look any different than an Obama one but thats just me. And the gas thing aint Obamas fault just like it wasn’t Bushs fault but the public needs someone to blame. The only thing other than the healthcare that is gonna hurt romney is the mormon thing. Even though to me its no big deal( cause i think all religion is ridiculous) The evangelicals don’t like Mormons and he needs those freaks on his side:)

I just gave you a “thumbs up” for your well-reasoned response–I respect that! Whether Romney could beat 0bama would depend on how willing Romney is to pull out all the stops and point out the clear differences between his vision and the vision 0bama has followed. Personally, I don’t think he has the cajones to tell it like it is.

As far as the “gas thing” is concerned, I hold the opinion that 0bama has caused gas prices to go up by his not being willing to develop our domestic resources (and I’m NOT talking about giving a failed auto manufacturer billions of dollars to develop an electric car no one wants and no one can afford that gets its juice from coal-fired generator plants.) This is basic economics: If one has a single apple (commodity) the price is steep; if one has a million apples, it’s a buyers market. Now, please translate that apple to gallons of gasoline and you’ll see what not drilling our own oil (as 0bama refused to allow) is doing to our fuel prices. There’s also leveraging the market: if the US fully taps its reserves and doesn’t have to rely on foreign oil, the foreing producers get real friendly with their prices. When George W Bush was in office, I begged him to expand our strategic reserves (only 37 days worth at current levels) by at least tenfold. Nah, that idiot didn’t listen, either.

You’re spot on with the other stuff–the “repubicans” do tend to shoot themselves in the foot by picking at the other candidates, but I’m really not against that so much–I merely wish the “dimocraps” would be just as honest. They ain’t.

You’re also correct that the fundamentalists are unwise to pick on a man (e.g. Romney) for his religion (LDS). It’s pretty close to being stupid on their part, but you’ve gotta admit the liberals are right there throwing gasoline on the fire, and the fundamentalists are too dumb to realize it.

I didn’t mean to write you a book but I wanted to cover one last thing: As a man of science–now retired–I held religion and a belief in a Supreme Being at arms length. (Translated “Atheism”) I argued that it is impossible to prove a negative–that God does not exist–because we cannot examine all the evidence. Yet, I have come to believe there is something within us that is greater than ourselves and that everyone is a part of this consciousness. While I still do not try to do good merely out of my fearing a punishment (Hell), or anticipation of a reward (Heaven), I have found an inner strength to be more patient with people, more kind to others, and more at peace with myself after concluding that I am not an entity unto myself but a part of something greater. You might try it–it won’t hurt you and it’s free.