Republicans Slam VP for Giving Reporters Kamala Harris Cookies — Which Were Gift From a Black-Owned Bakery

Courtney Subramanian/White House pool
Republicans attacked Vice President Kamala Harris after she gave reporters cookies — featuring her own likeness and that of Air Force Two — that were given to her by a Black-owned Washington, DC bakery.
USA Today White House correspondent Courtney Subramanian is a pool reporter on VP Harris’ current overseas trip, and tweeted a photo of one of the cookies along with the caption “@vp made an OTR visit to the back of the plane and delivered cookies decorated with the shape of her likeness as well as AF2.”
@vp made an OTR visit to the back of the plane and delivered cookies decorated with the shape of her likeness as well as AF2. pic.twitter.com/TQrUR47Vgc
— Courtney Subramanian (@cmsub) June 7, 2021
Republicans, including RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel and CNN commentator Scott Jennings, pounced on the gesture. Some pointed to it as a sign of “narccicism” and worse, even implying that the veep has a Christ complex. One commentator called it “extremely disturbing behavior.” OTher complained that it was a poor use of “tax dollars.”
handing out cookies with your own likeness on it – definitely normal. https://t.co/ArTXLEQCFc
— Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) June 7, 2021
Handing out cookies with her face on them as the border crisis rages…
The modern-day equivalent of “let them eat cake.”https://t.co/iInoYGXXp7
— Ronna McDaniel (@GOPChairwoman) June 7, 2021
I thought someone gave Kamala cookies that look like her.
That would’ve been a cute gift.
Instead, she gave cookies that look like her to other people.
That’s a narcissistic AF and a totally weird gift. https://t.co/cyeW2ZvmFK
— Lauren Chen (@TheLaurenChen) June 7, 2021
Kamala Harris gives out Kamala Harris cookies… https://t.co/oXIcFikKuc
— Byron York (@ByronYork) June 7, 2021
Her face is melting. She has no eyes. And she wore a pearl necklace. https://t.co/tRhnr5WkQq
— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) June 7, 2021
I get that politicians already have absurd amounts of self confidence but I can’t imagine ever handing someone a cookie of my face. https://t.co/ODDm3JFyL8
— Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) June 7, 2021
“Here you go, everyone. I thought you might like to eat my face.”
What a weirdo. Extremely disturbing behavior. https://t.co/t1QzpAmqlC
— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) June 7, 2021
But President Trump was egotistical and a narcissist, right? Riiiiight…… https://t.co/DOfT6SfLL5
— Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) June 8, 2021
Take, eat; this is my body, https://t.co/Rpnk0Y3YNF
— Mark Krikorian (@MarkSKrikorian) June 7, 2021
Because this trip is all about her and not the American people. https://t.co/yykeUH2RHX
— PARIS (@PARISDENNARD) June 7, 2021
The country is over $28 trillion in debt and the @VP is spending your tax dollars to give cookies that look like her to the media. https://t.co/YCmhRztClU
— RSC (@RepublicanStudy) June 7, 2021
— Jason Miller (@JasonMillerinDC) June 7, 2021
And some reactions from verified conservatives — including Trump aides — contained blatantly misogynistic and pornographic insinuations.
But according to Subramanian’s pool report, the cookies were a gift from a local Black-owned bakery:
VPOTUS came to the back of the plane and spoke to press OTR for five minutes. She delivered cookies decorated with the shape of her likeness as well as of Air Force Two. The cookies were provided by Cupcake Dreams, a black-owned business in Washington, DC. The bakery owner’s name is Aleatra Dimitrijevski.
The background that Subramanian provided was slightly errant — the bakery owned by Aleatra Jones-Dimitrijevski is called “Cake-Wich Craft,” and they run a scholarship drive called “Cupcake Dreams.”
The bakery makes custom treats, some of which can be seen on Jones-Dimitrijevski’s Instagram.
So the cookies were a gift to the first Black woman vice president from a Black woman entrepreneur, and were not, in fact, a taxpayer-funded vanity exercise. The cookies themselves appear to be a tribute to the VP’s iconic place in history, which makes her an inspirational figure to many — but obviously not to everyone.
That background information — most of which was readily available in a publicly available pool report — might have changed some of the criticisms had Subramanian included it in her tweet, but perhaps not others.