1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser
Advertisement

Final Answer: President Obama Did Fill Out 1996 Questionnaire Supporting Gay Marriage

» 19 comments

White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer resurrected a longstanding controversy Friday when he said that President Obama had not personally filled out a 1996 questionnaire that indicated support for gay marriage. At today’s White House briefing, The Washington Blade‘s Chris Johnson was finally able to get confirmation that the President did, indeed, fill out the questionnaire. Despite Jay Carney‘s protests to the contrary, the White House has not been at all forthcoming in answering that question.

During a Q&A this past Friday at the Netroots Nation conference, Pfeiffer was asked about the questionnaire, and in his response, made the same mistake that Robert Gibbs did when Johnson asked about it in January, confusing it with two other 1996 questionnaires about gun control. The gun control questionnaires were filled out by Obama’s then-campaign manager Carol Harwell.

“If you actually go back and look,” Pfeiffer said, “that questionnaire was actually filled out by someone else, not the President.”

Following Pfeiffer’s remarks, the White House issued a statement explaining the confusion, but still did not confirm that Mr. Obama had filled out the document in question:

“Dan was not familiar with the history of the questionnaire that was brought up today, but the president’s views are clear,” (White House spokesman Shin) Inouye said. “He has long supported equal rights and benefits for gay and lesbian couples and since taking office he has signed into law the repeal of ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,’ signed into law the hate crimes bill, made the decision not to defend Section 3 of DOMA and expanded federal benefits for same sex partners of federal employees.”

This statement is all too familiar to me. Following Gibbs’ January response, I explained to Gibbs that he had been thinking of the gun control surveys, and that the gay marriage questionnaire had never really been addressed, save an oblique reference by then-Senator Obama in a 2004 interview, which seemed to indicate he had filled it out.

He referred me to a deputy press secretary for followup, and after two weeks of emails, I finally received this statement, from Shin Inouye:

The President has made his position on this issue clear – as a candidate in 2008, in his public writings, and in his on the record comments on at least three separate occasions. He’s also made it clear that he supports full civil unions and federal rights for LGBT couples, supports a repeal of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act, and opposes a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and opposes divisive measures like Proposition 8 in California. His Administration has also taken numerous steps to help secure equal rights for LGBT Americans, such as extending benefits to the same-sex domestic partners of federal employees and ensuring equal access to HUD programs, and we hope to continue making progress.

For a guy whose views are clear, President Obama’s press office sure went to a lot of trouble to avoid answering that question. Yes, confirming this would make it appear he had flipped on the issue, but he handled that very well in that 2004 interview:

The Windy City Times, which later acquired Outlines, said it interviewed Obama in 2004, when he was a state legislator running for the U.S. Senate. In a January 2009 article recapping the interview, the newspaper quoted him as saying he no longer supported same-sex marriage “primarily just as a strategic issue,” and not because he had changed his philosophy.

“I think that marriage, in the minds of a lot of voters, has a religious connotation,” Obama said, according to the article. “I know that’s true in the African American community, for example.” Instead, he endorsed civil unions, a designation that did not exist in 1996.

That strategy later evolved to include saying he personally didn’t believe in gay marriage, but opposed efforts to ban it. At that time, there was some resonance to the argument that in order to help gay people, Obama needed to get elected, even if that meant taking a lukewarm porridge position on gay marriage.

At Monday’s White House briefing, Johnson asked Carney about it again, and among the “we love the gays” boilerplate we have come to know and love, Carney confirmed that it was his understanding that the President had completed the questionnaire himself, and Carney acted as though this had always been common knowledge: (transcript via The Washington Blade, additional transcription by Tommy Christopher)

Washington Blade: Jay, I just want to follow up on remarks that Dan Pfeiffer made last week on the president’s 1996 questionnaire response on marriage. The statement from the president in 1996 reads, “I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibits such marriages.” Pfeiffer said someone else filled out this questionnaire for the president. Can you confirm that it’s the White House’s position that someone else filled out this questionnaire and —

Carney: Chris, I think you know because you’ve read it multiple times since then that we’ve corrected it beginning Friday that he — that that is not the case, that he was mistaking with another questionnaire.

The president’s position on gay marriage has been clear since ’08 — is clear, again, since he’s been president.

Q: Jay, will you clarify whether the ’96 survey was signed by Obama?

Carney: It’s my understanding that it was.

Blade: But did the president, in fact, support same-sex marriage in 1996?

Carney: Again, what I know is what his position was during the campaign and what it is now. He’s been very clear about it. He was very clear in the campaign. He was very clear about the fact that his position on the views — that’s it evolving. And I really don’t have anything to add to it.

Blade: On Thursday, the president is attending an LGBT fundraiser in New York. This state could have same-sex marriage by the end of this week. It’s very possible. Next week, he’s hosting a Pride reception here at the White House. Isn’t the president selling this audience short by saying he supports them and wants their money for his re-election campaign, but also saying at the same time he does not support their right to marry?

Carney: Chris, I think you know that this president is very supportive of and strong on LGBT rights. And his record is significant with regard to that. He’s been very clear about his position on gay marriage, he’s been very clear about how that position is evolving. I don’t have any new announcements to make, but I think you know his record, and he’s proud of it.

Johnson also asked Carney if the President might share his “evolution” on marriage equality at an upcoming LGBT event, to which Carney replied, “I don’t anticipate that.”

Here’s the problem: the President’s views are clear; as I told Carney a few weeks ago, any reasonable person would conclude, from his words and actions, that President Obama believes in the right of same sex couples to marry, yet he still has not said so, publicly. It’s not 2008 anymore, and while the entire 2012 GOP field (save Ron Paul and Herman Cain) hasn’t progressed, the rest of the country has. For the first time, a majority of Americans support marriage equality, and civil unions have become the 8-track tape of gay rights.

The Democrats no longer have a filibuster-proof majority, and no chance to repeal DOMA, so this is no longer a strategic fight. It is a fight for the hearts and minds of those who still don’t grasp the inequity of second class citizenship, many of whom, as Don Lemon pointed out, are part of a key Obama constituency.

It’s a fight for the hearts and minds of those Democrats who are still stuck in Clinton triangulation mode.

It’s also a fight for the hearts and minds of the tens of millions of LGBT people, and those who love them, who are encouraged by the strides that the President’s press team rattles off, but who are confused by his refusal to stand by them and say, “I believe you are equal.”

It’s a fight for the hearts and minds of all the kids who really need to hear him say that, the kids we keep telling, “It gets better.”

Nobody believes that the President is sitting around, thinking and thinking about this issue, unable to push that boulder over the hill. As Carney’s answers demonstrate, it could not be more obvious that President Obama believes in marriage equality. With so many people who need to hear it, why won’t he say it?

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • cjd ohio 1

    why tommy? what do you think?

  • The Lantern of Truth

    You know that Obama’s lying about ” evolving” on the subject .

    Why not stand up in the pressroom and ask Carney why Obama is lying on gay marriage ? He’ll appreciate your not mincing words ( no offense ).

  • Pablo

    Oh. So they just lied about it? Huh.

  • Cecelia

    “With so many people who need to hear it, why won’t he say it?”

    Same reason Clinton, Gore, and Kerry didn’t: Political expediency, and the LGBT constituency isn’t exactly going anywhere else.

  • gar

    What does Tommy and the White House have in common? They both can’t own up for their lies.

  • Cecelia

    The Lantern of Truth said:
    You know that Obama’s lying about ” evolving” on the subject .

    I figure he’ll have “evolved” to the point of being where he already is… say about 11/012.

  • fghcpl

    Ladies and gentlemen,Hello everybody,
    input this URL: === http://globalsell.org/ ===
    shirts, bags, hat and the decorations.
    you can find many cheap and fashion stuff (jor dan shoes)
    (NBA NFL NHL MLB jersey)
    ( lv handbag)
    (cha nel wallet)
    (D&G sunglasses)
    (ed har dy jacket)
    (UGG boot)
    and so on..welcome to our website:
    ( http://globalsell.org/)
    we sincerely hope to establish the business relation with you.
    Looking forward your visit.

  • Cecelia

    Well, I suppose Carney is a bit more reliable than anonymous twittering fan grils (and one of their parents). but mind if I don’t take that italicized “Did” as written in stone?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dave-Be/1751243136 Dave Be

    If you really want to know why he won’t say it, it’s because he doesn’t have to. Whoever he runs against won’t be as strong a supporter of gay rights as he is, and he’s already done a lot to advance the gay cause, so he’s got the gay rights votes already. Why alienate other people without an upside? If he’s reelected I’m sure he’ll come out in favor of gay marriage, but doing so now would hurt his chances.

    You talk about the votes he’s not going to get because of idealogy, but don’t you remember the 2004 election? Republicans turned out in record numbers to vote against gay marriage on the state level, and while they were there voted for Bush too. There are voters that will be galvanized into going to the polls to vote against the gay marriage candidate who would otherwise not bother to show up.

  • Liberal Tormentor – tormenting liberals with logic and facts since 1972

    Dave Be says:

    If he’s reelected I’m sure he’ll come out in favor of gay marriage, but doing so now would hurt his chances.

    So it’s about politics and not his convidtions? Got it!

  • TillieGlockenspiel

    Lies, bigger lies and the lying liar who tells them.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dave-Be/1751243136 Dave Be

    Liberal Tormentor - tormenting liberals with logic and facts since 1972 said:
    Dave Be says: If he’s reelected I’m sure he’ll come out in favor of gay marriage, but doing so now would hurt his chances. So it’s about politics and not his convidtions? Got it!

    Absolutely. Politicians on both sides have to be careful what they say and who they offend. It makes no practical difference if the president supports gay marriage or not with the current makeup of congress, so why poke the bear? If he had strong convictions one way or the other he’d probably have been beating the drum for them all along.

  • Prom Night Dumpster Baby

    This is a “thing”? Didn’t we already know Obama was a good human being?

    Non-president Obama and president Obama don’t always see eye-to-eye when it comes down to legislation. Shouldn’t be a surprise, but it is disappointing.

  • Just4thefax

    fact: Another attempt at Obama and crew in charge of the media and what they want reported.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dronetek-Bulk-Vanderhuge/100000918732763 Dronetek

    Its so hilarious how the media is trying to carry the water for Obama on this. He says he doesnt support gay marriage, but dammit the media is going to try and convince everyone otherwise.

  • Ramrants

    Liberal Tormentor - tormenting liberals with logic and facts since 1972 said:
    Dave Be says:

    If he’s reelected I’m sure he’ll come out in favor of gay marriage, but doing so now would hurt his chances.

    So it’s about politics and not his convidtions? Got it!

    But why would this hurt his chances of reelection if, as Tommy claims, the majority of people support gay marriage? Could it be because the majority of people don’t actually support gay marriage and the one poll that makes that claim is inaccurate, like most polls have become over the last 3 years and the President knows this?

    If the majority of people truly do support gay marriage then our Machiavelli president would have no problem admitting he loves teh gays and stop using them to fill his campaign coffers.

  • RIChris

    Of course someone else filled out Obama’s questionnaires for him. If anythng gets done within a radius of fifty feet of Obama, it’s a safe bet someone else was doing the doing, but Obama was ‘present’.

  • Tedderman

    It may be that as President, Obama now believes individual states may choose to legalize gay marriage as some have tried to do. States which are as yet not sufficiently evolved on the gay marriage issue will not likely be ready for some time to instate the practice. The President is simply doing something all politicians have done since the beginning of our democracy, straddling the fence.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dave-Be/1751243136 Dave Be

    Ramrants said:
    But why would this hurt his chances of reelection if, as Tommy claims, the majority of people support gay marriage? Could it be because the majority of people don’t actually support gay marriage and the one poll that makes that claim is inaccurate, like most polls have become over the last 3 years and the President knows this? If the majority of people truly do support gay marriage then our Machiavelli president would have no problem admitting he loves teh gays and stop using them to fill his campaign coffers.

    Whether a scant majority is in favor of gay marriage or not doesn’t matter. People who are in favor of it will vote for Obama based on his track record on gay rights whether he comes out in favor of it or not. People who oppose gay marriage who otherwise might stay home will go to the polls to vote against it, or against a guy who wants to legalize it, as evidenced by the 2004 presidential election.

    As an aside, it doesn’t matter if a majority support gay marriage or not, it’s still the right thing to do. There wasn’t a majority in favor of freeing the slaves, or in favor of the 14th amendment, or the end of school segregation, or a number of other civil liberties issues throughout American history. The right thing is still the right thing, whether the majority supports it or not.

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram