1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser
Advertisement

WaPo Omsbudsman Says Paper Was Wrong In Removing Muhammad Cartoon

» 3 comments

Last week, a number of newspapers, including the Washington Post, decided not to run Sunday’s Non Sequitur comic. The cartoon featured a parody of the the popular Where’s Waldo? series of children’s books with the caption “Picture book title voted least likely to ever find a publisher…” followed by a drawing of a charming park scene and the answer/punchline: “Where’s Muhammad?” Andrew Alexander, the Post’s Omsbudsman, has now written a letter stating the paper’s editors were wrong for removing the cartoon.

From the Washington Post:

“Surely some may be displeased by ‘Where’s Muhammad?’ But unlike with the Danish cartoons, it’s hard to imagine it would incite protests. Miller intentionally did not depict Muhammad, and the cartoon is not a blasphemous attack on the prophet. If anything, it’s a powerful and witty endorsement of freedom of expression.

Post editors believe their decision was prudent, given the past cartoon controversies and heightened sensitivities surrounding Islam. But it also can be seen as timid. And it sets an awfully low threshold for decisions on whether to withhold words or images that might offend.”

Alexander also writes that Non Sequitur cartoonist Wiley Miller was “fuming” with the censorship. The Omsbudsman even got a quote from Ibrahim Hooper, communications director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, to prove that the cartoon wasn’t offensive. Still though, his claim that one can’t imagine the comic inciting protests is questionable. Consider the fact that the comic is very similar in content if not execution to the comic that forced a Seattle cartoonist to go into hiding.

However, while Alexander’s optimism may be misplaced, the rest of his letter reads well. The censorship last week was just the latest in the year’s many Muslim-related overreactions, a sad year where some people tried to hide Americans from the fact that Muslims even exist while major corporations made the equally frightening decision to censor American artists for fear of terrorists.

(h/t Poynter)

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • More Liberty

    “Post editors believe their decision was prudent, given the past cartoon controversies and heightened sensitivities surrounding Islam. But it also can be seen as timid. And it sets an awfully low threshold for decisions on whether to withhold words or images that might offend.”

    In other words these editors are scared out of their minds, and would not dare upset a muslim. Why? Because many in that religion are very intolerant. They won’t just protest, they will commit acts of brutality – even death. On the other hand, Christians, Pagans, Jews, Buddists and others aren’t going to kill when their religion is attacked.

  • Puter Boi

    In a related story Andrew Alexander, the Post’s Omsbudsman, has now gone into hiding and will remain “underground” for the foreseeable future.

    This has been Puter Boi reporting from the deep recesses in the windmills of my mind.
    Back to you, Jon.

  • http://www.libertarianism.com/ Burnnotice

    Ahhh the pendulum swings. The Pundits used to be afraid of the Christians till Larry Flynt. Now its the Muslims..

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram